Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The role of magnetic resonance imaging in Ménière disease: the current state of endolymphatic hydrops evaluation

ABSTRACT

Technical advances in magnetic resonance imaging have allowed to accurately detect and grade endolymphatic space distension in Ménière disease; this was only possible in post-mortem histological studies until a few years ago. Magnetic resonance imaging rules out other causes of vertigo and hearing loss, and is able to evaluate the cochlear and vestibular compartments of the endolymphatic space using a dedicated protocol.

Magnetic resonance imaging; Ménière disease; Labyrinth diseases; Saccule and utricle; Ear, inner; Endolymphatic hydrops

RESUMO

Os avanços técnicos na ressonância magnética têm permitido detectar e classificar com acurácia a distensão do espaço endolinfático na doença de Ménière; isso só era possível nos estudos histológicos post-mortem até poucos anos atrás. Além de afastar outras causas de vertigem e de perda auditiva, a ressonância magnética é capaz de avaliar os compartimentos coclear e vestibular do espaço endolinfático por meio de um protocolo dedicado.

Imagem por ressonância magnética; Doença de Ménière; Doenças do labirinto; Sáculo e utrículo; Orelha interna; Hidropsia endolinfática

INTRODUCTION

Ménière disease (MD) is a clinical syndrome of unknown etiology, and consists of intermittent episodes of vertigo, often associated with fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss, tinnitus and aural fullness.(11. Gürkov R. Menière and friends: imaging and Classification of Hydropic Ear Disease. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(10):e539-44.) The pathogenesis of MD is attributed to endolymphatic hydrops (EH), characterized by distension of the labyrinthine structures that contain endolymph: cochlear duct, saccule, utricle, ampullae and semicircular ducts, corroborated by post-mortem studies.(22. Pender DJ. Endolymphatic hydrops and Ménière’s disease: a lesion meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(10):859-65.) However, the relation between MD and EH is complex and not yet fully established.

Only recently has magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) been able to detect EH in MD, allowing its confirmation in vivo. Nakashima et al.,(33. Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Sugiura M, Teranishi M, Sone M, Hayashi H, et al. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(3):415-20.) demonstrated endolymphatic space distension in patients with MD using a three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (3D-FLAIR) sequence, in a 3-Tesla field device, 24 hours after intratympanic administration of gadolinium. As gadolinium accumulates in the perilymph and does not reach the endolymph, it is possible to differentiate these two compartments and to demonstrate EH.

Since then, new protocols and sequences have been developed to differentiate the endolymphatic and perilymphatic compartments in clinical practice, and many of them use intravenous gadolinium administration. Although the intratympanic route results in a higher concentration of gadolinium in perilymph, it consists of an off-label use, is less practical and requires a 24-hour wait before image acquisition. On the other hand, the intravenous route has the following advantages: it is less invasive, evaluates both ears at the same time, does not depend on the permeability of the oval and round windows, allows to evaluate the blood-labyrinth barrier and requires a shorter waiting time before image acquisition (4 hours).(44. Lingam RK, Connor SE, Casselman JW, Beale T. MRI in otology: applications in cholesteatoma and Ménière’s disease. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):35-44.Review.) Three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and inversion recovery turbo spin echo with real reconstruction (3D real-IR) are among the most used MRI sequences to characterize the signal differences between perilymph (with contrast) and endolymph (without contrast).

Regarding EH grading, one of the first methods used was the one proposed by Nakashima et al.,(55. Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Pyykko I, Gibson WP, Sone M, Nakata S, et al. Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2009;(560):5-8.) which classified EH as none, mild and significant according to the ratio between the endolymphatic space and the labyrinthine fluid space (sum of endolymphatic and perilymphatic spaces). Vestibular hydrops would be considered mild if the endolymphatic space occupied between 33.3% and 50% of the vestibular fluid space, or significant if it occupied more than 50% (Figure 1). Cochlear hydrops would be considered mild if the dilated cochlear duct was smaller than the vestibular scale, or significant if the cochlear duct was larger than the vestibular scale (Figure 1). However, some authors have questioned this method by demonstrating that the area of endolymphatic space can be altered according to the inversion time used in image acquisition.(66. Eliezer M, Gillibert A, Tropres I, Krainik A, Attyé A. Influence of inversion time on endolymphatic hydrops evaluation in 3D-FLAIR imaging. J Neuroradiol. 2017;44(5):339-43.,77. Attyé A, Eliezer M, Boudiaf N, Tropres I, Chechin D, Schmerber S, et al. MRI of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease: a case-controlled study with a simplified classification based on saccular morphology. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3138-46.) Other semiquantitative graduation methods were described using different values of cut-off and evaluation criteria, but there is still no consensus in the literature about the method to be used.(44. Lingam RK, Connor SE, Casselman JW, Beale T. MRI in otology: applications in cholesteatoma and Ménière’s disease. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):35-44.Review.)

Figure 1
Axial magnetic resonance imaging of the left ear of a patient diagnosed with Ménière disease. (A) Highly T2-weighted sequence shows the labyrinthine fluid space (sum of endolymphatic and perilymphatic spaces). (B) Inversion recovery turbo spin echo with real reconstruction (3D real-IR) sequence 4 hours after intravenous gadolinium administration shows distension of saccule and utricle, which occupy most of the vestibular area (long arrow), and significant distension of cochlear duct (short arrows)

A recent meta-analysis demonstrated an order of EH progression in MD, which begins in the cochlea and then involves the saccule, utricle, ampullae and finally the semicircular ducts.(22. Pender DJ. Endolymphatic hydrops and Ménière’s disease: a lesion meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(10):859-65.) In addition, the degree of distension of the membranous labyrinth structures appears to be related to its mechanical complacency, which is high in the saccule and lower in the utricle and semicircular ducts.(88. Pender DJ. Membrane stress in the human labyrinth and Meniere disease: a model analysis. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;19(4):336-42.) In this context, Attyé et al.,(77. Attyé A, Eliezer M, Boudiaf N, Tropres I, Chechin D, Schmerber S, et al. MRI of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease: a case-controlled study with a simplified classification based on saccular morphology. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3138-46.) described a new criterion for EH evaluation called SURI (inversion of the saccule to utricle area ratio), which was only observed in patients with MD (sensitivity: 50% and specificity: 100%).

Several studies have shown the relation between EH detection and grading in MRI with the clinical findings in patients with MD.(11. Gürkov R. Menière and friends: imaging and Classification of Hydropic Ear Disease. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(10):e539-44.,99. Baráth K, Schuknecht B, Naldi AM, Schrepfer T, Bockisch CJ, Hegemann SC. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(7):1387-92.,1010. Pyykkö I, Nakashima T, Yoshida T, Zou J, Naganawa S. Meniere’s disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2). pii: e001555.) In one of them,(99. Baráth K, Schuknecht B, Naldi AM, Schrepfer T, Bockisch CJ, Hegemann SC. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(7):1387-92.) 90% of patients with MD had endolymphatic hydrops in MRI, similar frequency found in histopathological studies. In addition, the progression of EH over time and the correlation with loss of cochlear and vestibular function in patients with MD have been demonstrated.(11. Gürkov R. Menière and friends: imaging and Classification of Hydropic Ear Disease. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(10):e539-44.,1010. Pyykkö I, Nakashima T, Yoshida T, Zou J, Naganawa S. Meniere’s disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2). pii: e001555.) These studies also revealed the presence of variable EH in the asymptomatic ear of patients with unilateral clinical presentation, indicating that MD can be a systemic disease with bilateral evolution over time.

The MRI advances have shown that this imaging method is a robust tool in the evaluation of EH, with results similar to those found in post-mortem temporal bone studies. Magnetic resonance imaging allows to rule out other causes of vertigo and hearing loss, such as vestibular schwannomas, and also to evaluate separately the cochlear and vestibular compartments of the endolymphatic space with a dedicated protocol. The imaging acquisition and evaluation techniques of EH are still under development, but it is possible that new large-scale studies validate MRI as an accurate tool in the diagnostic criteria of MD in a near future.

REFERENCES

  • 1
    Gürkov R. Menière and friends: imaging and Classification of Hydropic Ear Disease. Otol Neurotol. 2017;38(10):e539-44.
  • 2
    Pender DJ. Endolymphatic hydrops and Ménière’s disease: a lesion meta-analysis. J Laryngol Otol. 2014;128(10):859-65.
  • 3
    Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Sugiura M, Teranishi M, Sone M, Hayashi H, et al. Visualization of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(3):415-20.
  • 4
    Lingam RK, Connor SE, Casselman JW, Beale T. MRI in otology: applications in cholesteatoma and Ménière’s disease. Clin Radiol. 2018;73(1):35-44.Review.
  • 5
    Nakashima T, Naganawa S, Pyykko I, Gibson WP, Sone M, Nakata S, et al. Grading of endolymphatic hydrops using magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2009;(560):5-8.
  • 6
    Eliezer M, Gillibert A, Tropres I, Krainik A, Attyé A. Influence of inversion time on endolymphatic hydrops evaluation in 3D-FLAIR imaging. J Neuroradiol. 2017;44(5):339-43.
  • 7
    Attyé A, Eliezer M, Boudiaf N, Tropres I, Chechin D, Schmerber S, et al. MRI of endolymphatic hydrops in patients with Meniere’s disease: a case-controlled study with a simplified classification based on saccular morphology. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3138-46.
  • 8
    Pender DJ. Membrane stress in the human labyrinth and Meniere disease: a model analysis. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;19(4):336-42.
  • 9
    Baráth K, Schuknecht B, Naldi AM, Schrepfer T, Bockisch CJ, Hegemann SC. Detection and grading of endolymphatic hydrops in Menière disease using MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35(7):1387-92.
  • 10
    Pyykkö I, Nakashima T, Yoshida T, Zou J, Naganawa S. Meniere’s disease: a reappraisal supported by a variable latency of symptoms and the MRI visualisation of endolymphatic hydrops. BMJ Open. 2013;3(2). pii: e001555.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    25 Feb 2019
  • Date of issue
    2019

History

  • Received
    16 Aug 2018
  • Accepted
    11 Jan 2019
Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa Albert Einstein Avenida Albert Einstein, 627/701 , 05651-901 São Paulo - SP, Tel.: (55 11) 2151 0904 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: revista@einstein.br