Services on Demand
On-line version ISSN 1982-0224
Neotrop. ichthyol. vol.1 no.2 Porto Alegre Oct./Dec. 2003
The late Miocene Phractocephalus catfish (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) from Urumaco, Venezuela: additional specimens and reinterpretation as a distinct species
John G. LundbergI; Orangel AguileraII
IDepartment of Ichthyology, The Academy of Natural Sciences, 1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA. e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
IIUniversidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda, Centro de Investigaciones en Ciencias Básicas, Complejo Docente Los Perozos, Carretera Variante Sur, Coro, 4101, Estado Falcón, Venezuela, and Research Associate, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute. e-mail: email@example.com
Based on additional specimens the fossil pimelodid catfish from the upper Miocene Urumaco Formation, Falcón State, Venezuela originally assigned to the extant species Phractocephalus hemioliopterus is described as a new, extinct species. Phractocephalus nassi n. sp. is diagnosed by the following combination of characters: 1) posterior half of frontals and anterior half of supraoccipital with elongate, coarse ridges and sulci in addition to reticulating ridges and subcircular pits; 2) very broad and ornamented mesethmoid bone; 3) lateral ethmoid margin convex and eliminating orbital notch but not projecting far anteriorly over palatine condyle; 4) anterior cranial fontanelle closed or represented by a small pit; 5) supraoccipital process rounded laterally and posterolaterally, concave posteriorly and completely concealing Weberian complex in dorsal view; 6) opercle covered with reticulating ridges and pits; 7) cleithrum coarsely ornamented along ventral edge and bulging outward lateral to spine articulation; 8) pectoral spine mostly ornamented with coarse ridges and sulci. Phractocephalus nassi is compared to modern P. hemioliopterus and an undescribed extinct species from the upper Miocene Solimões Formation, Acre, Brazil. New diagnostic characters of Phractocephalus are presented that apply to the modern and fossil species, including: 1) ornamentation of skull, pectoral girdle and fin spines comprising a coarse meshwork of reticulating ridges surrounding rounded pits plus some elongate ridges and sulci; 2) supraoccipital posterior process greatly expanded laterally and posteriorly behind occipital wall; 3) lateral ethmoid and sphenotic broadly sutured behind eye; 4) anterior cranial fontanelle reduced or completely closed and posterior cranial fontanelle closed; 5) vomerine tooth plate large, roughly pentagonal to triangular in form, and with fine teeth. Today Phractocephalus ranges widely throughout the lowland Orinoco, Amazon and Essequibo basins. However, the genus does not occur west or north of the Andes or Venezuelan coastal ranges. Recognizing the Urumaco Phractocephalus as a distinct species does not alter the obvious conclusion that this catfish marks a large river connection between the Caribbean coastal region and the Orinoco system during at least part of the Neogene. Other Urumaco fossils show this same biogeographic relationship.
Key words: Phractocephalus nassi, fossils, Urumaco Formation, Paleo-Amazon-Orinoco.
É descrita uma nova espécie fóssil de bagre pimelodídeo proveniente da Formação Urumaco do Mioceno superior no estado Falcón, Venezuela. O exemplar fóssil foi originalmente atribuído a espécie recente Phractocephalus hemioliopterus. Porém, com base em exemplares fósseis adicionais provenientes da Formação Urumaco, essa espécie extinta é descrita como uma nova espécie. As características diagnósticas da nova espécie Phractocephalus nassi são as seguintes: 1) a metade posterior do frontal e a metade anterior do supraocciptal apresentam uma ornamentação caracterizada por altos relevos e sulcos alongados, assim como reticulações e algumas depressões subcirculares; 2) o mesetmóide é muito largo e está ornamentado; 3) a margem do etmóide lateral é convexa, não apresenta o entalhe orbital e não se projeta anteriormente sobre o côndilo palatino; 4) a fontanela cranial anterior está fechada e forma uma pequena depressão; 5) a margem do processo supraoccipital é redonda lateral e posteriormente, e cobre completamente o complexo de Weber quando visto dorsalmente; 6) o opérculo está ornamentado com reticulações e depressões; 7) o cleitro encontra-se densamente ornamentado ao longo da margem ventral da área de articulação do espinho peitoral; 8) o espinho peitoral encontra-se ornamentado com estrias e sulcos. Phractocephalus nassi é comparada com a espécie recente P. hemioliopterus e com outra especie fóssil da Formação Solimões do Mioceno superior do Acre no Brasil, a qual ainda não foi descrita. Apresentam-se novas características diagnósticas para o gênero que incluem as espécies recente e fóssil tais como: 1) a ornamentação do crânio, da cintura peitoral e dos espinhos apresenta-se como uma rede de altos relevos e sulcos alongados, assim como reticulações e algumas depressões subcirculares; 2) a sutura entre o etmóide lateral e o esfenótico é ampla e localiza-se por detrás da órbita; 3) a fontanela cranial anterior está reduzida ou fechada, a fontanela cranial posterior se fecha completamente; 4) a placa dental do vômer é grande, aproximadamente de forma pentagonal a triângular e encontra-se provida de pequenos dentes. Atualmente, Phractocephalus encontra-se amplamente distribuído nos rios de terras baixas e nas encostas do Orinoco, Amazonas e Essequibo. No entanto, não é encontrado ao norte e a oeste dos Andes e tão pouco ao longo da costa venezuelana. O reconhecimento do Phractocephalus de Urumaco como uma espécie diferente da espécie recente não altera as conclusões prévias de que esse bagre pimelodideo representa o testemunho da ampla conexão fluvial que existiu entre a região costeira do Caribe e a bacia do Orinoco no final do Neogeno. Outras espécies fósseis de Urumaco também demonstram esta relação biogeográfica.
Lundberg et al. (1988) described a large catfish skull from the upper Miocene Urumaco Formation, Falcón State, Venezuela. Based on characteristics known at the time, the fossil was assigned to the extant species Phractocephalus hemioliopterus (Bloch & Schneider, 1801), family Pimelodidae. While the 1988 paper was in press a nearly complete and extraordinarily well preserved cranium came to light and briefly noted (Lundberg et al., op. cit., p. 138). Now we have had the opportunity to examine and assess the details of that specimen. In addition, several more Urumaco specimens of Phractocephalus Agassiz have been collected that contribute significant new information on this catfish. Comparisons of these additional fossils with modern specimens (Aguilera, 1994, and herein) show that the Urumaco Phractocephalus is taxonomically distinct from modern P. hemioliopterus.
Well-preserved fossils of Phractocephalus have also been reported in the upper Miocene Solimões Formation in Acre, Brazil (Latrubesse et al., 1997; Bocquentin-Villanueva, Jégu & Brito, 1997), and fragmentary material is preserved in the middle Miocene La Venta fauna of Colombia (Lundberg, 1997, 1998). The Acre fossil is being named and described by J. Bocquentin-Villanueva, M. Jégu and P. Brito. Those worker's and our comparisons of the Urumaco and Acre fossils reveal that the latter represents a second fossil species of Phractocephalus. Accordingly, in this paper we name and diagnose the Urumaco Phractocephalus as a new species.
Phractocephalus has been considered monotypic. Modern P. hemioliopterus has a wide distribution in the lowland, meandering rivers and lagoons of the Orinoco, Amazon and Essequibo basins. This species, known as the "cajaro" in Venezuela and Colombia and "pirarara" in Brazil, is one of the most distinctive and important food and ornamental fishes in South America (Fig. 1). Based on the strong overall similarity between modern Phractocephalus and available fossil specimens from Urumaco, Lundberg et al. (1988) hypothesized that P. hemioliopterus is a long-lived species with no detectable morphological change since the late Miocene. The additional specimens show that is not the case. The modern and fossil specimens are closely similar in most details, including many characters that are uniquely derived among catfishes, yet these are demonstrably distinct species. The revised taxonomic status of the Urumaco fossil Phractocephalus does not alter its biogeographic significance. This fossil catfish provides direct evidence for former biotic and riverine connections between the Orinoco watershed and the Caribbean coastal region of South America (Lundberg et al., 1988; 1998; Díaz de Gamero, 1996). Thus, the Urumaco and Acre fossils expand our knowledge of the diversity of Phractocephalus over time and space.
Material and Methods
The specimens were collected during several expeditions to the Urumaco Formation (Fig. 2) between 1972 and 2002 by MCZ (B. Patterson), UNEFM (O. Aguilera; J. Bocquetin-Villanueva; R. Sánchez), USB (O. Linares; E. Pannier), and ANSP (J. Lundberg). The fossils are three-dimensional articulated crania and post-cranial disarticulated and usually broken bones obtained individually from surface exposures in the field. Preservation ranges from nearly perfect to badly abraded or broken bones. Matrix materials surrounding Urumaco specimens vary from fine, loose sand that was removed with brushes, to iron-stained claystone requiring softening with water and manual cleaning with fine tipped dental tools. Some broken but clearly associated specimens were reconstructed.
Comparative materials. Fossil Phractocephalus sp. from the Solimões Formation in Acre, Brazil, deposited at UFAC. Also, skeletal preparations of modern P. hemioliopterus from the Orinoco [ANSP 179553 (1, ex DU F925A), UNEFM-PR040, UNEFM-PR-041, MBUCV uncat. ] and Amazon [ANSP 179554 (2), ANSP 179559]. The modern skeletal specimens range in standard length from 265 - 900 mm. Measurement data of fossils emphasize overall specimen size and, as preservation allows, landmark-based linear dimensions for proportional (shape) comparisons among species (Table 1). Measurements were taken with vernier calipers and dividers, rounded to nearest mm.
Institutional abbreviations: ANSP Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA; DU Duke University, USA; MBUCV Museo de Biología, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela; MCN.USB Museo de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela; MCZ Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, MA, USA; UFAC Universidade Federal do Acre, Rio Branco, Brazil; UNEFM Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda, Coro, Venezuela.
Osteological abbreviations: AD anterior dentations of pectoral spine, BOC Basioccipital, BL ossified Baudelot´s ligament, EXOC Exoccipital, FR Frontal, HYO Hyomandibula, LE Lateral ethmoid, ME Mesethmoid, ORB Orbit, ORS Orbitosphenoid, PAS Parasphenoid, PD posterior dentations of pectoral spine, EXT Extrascapular, POP Preopercle, PROT Prootic, PTO Pterotic, Q Quadrate, SPH Sphenotic, SCL Supracleithrum, SOP Supraoccipital, VTP Vomerine tooth plate, W Weberian complex.
Order Siluriformes sensu Berg, 1940 Family Pimelodidae sensu Lundberg & Littmann, 2003 Genus Phractocephalus Spix & Agassiz, 1829
Type species. Phractocephalus bicolor Spix & Agassiz, 1829, by monotypy, a junior objective synonym of Silurus hemio liopterus Bloch & Schneider, 1801.
Diagnosis. Phractocephalus contains three species, one extant and two extinct. The following diagnosis of the genus emphasizes phylogenetically derived characters of the skeleton that are known to occur in all species.
1) Dermal bones of skull, pectoral girdle and fin spines extensively ornamented with a coarse meshwork of reticulating ridges surrounding rounded pits (Figs. 3a, 4a, 5a, g-i) plus some elongate ridges and sulci.
No other siluriforms known to us have a closely similar ridged and pitted style of ornamentation. Among other pimelodids, dermal bone ornamentation ranges from absent (smooth bone surfaces), to spongy or trabeculated, to fine or very coarsely striate ridges or tubercles.
2) Supraoccipital posterior process greatly expanded laterally and posteriorly behind occipital wall, extrascapulars and supracleithra (Figs. 3a, 4a). In association with this, the anterior nuchal plate is also much enlarged and similarly ornamented. These features were noted in the original description of Phractocephalus (Spix & Agassiz, 1829). The condition of the nuchal plate is directly known in modern P. hemioliopterus and the Acre fossil species. The anterior nuchal plate is inferred to have been present in the Urumaco species based on the shape and texture of articulation site along the posterior edge of the supraoccipital process (see Fig. 3).
No other siluriforms known to us have a similarly enlarged or shaped supraoccipital posterior process, or similarly expanded anterior nuchal plate. In all other pimelodids the supraoccipital process is narrowly triangular and tapered posteriorly toward and usually contacting a relatively small, triangular anterior nuchal plate. The supraoccipital process and nuchal plate are much reduced in a few pimelodid species.
All other pimelodids and most other catfishes have the lateral ethmoid and sphenotic well separated by the frontal that forms much of the skull roof edge including the dorsal margin of the orbit. Elsewhere among siluriforms the lateral ethmoid contacts the sphenotic in all Siluridae and some Loricariidae (Bornbusch, 1991).
All catfishes, at least early in development, have large, open anterior and posterior cranial fontanelles on the dorsal midline of the skull roof. In most species both fontanelles become restricted to narrow slits or small foramina during growth, and may close completely. Siluriforms exhibit a wide variety of relative growth patterns of skull bones that reduce cranial fontanelle size. Among pimelodids near or complete closure of the posterior fontanelle is common. Reduction of the anterior fontanelle to a persistent slit and surrounding sulcus running from the mesethmoid and between the frontals is common.
The presence of vomerine teeth is a primitive feature of siluriforms that is retained in many pimelodids, where either a pair of tooth patches or a median vomerine plate may be present. The size and shape of vomerine tooth patches varies greatly, but the oddly large size, distinctive shape and very fine teeth of Phractocephalus are unique.
Etymology. Phractocephalus from the Greek "phraktos" meaning fenced or walled in, plus cephalus reference to the unusual well-developed dermal bones of the skull and nape. Gender masculine.
Phractocephalus hemiliopterus (misspelling) Lundberg et al. 1988:131-138 (description, phylogeny, biogeography); Lundberg 1997:80 (listed).
Phractocephalus Lundberg & Chernoff. 1992:10 (listed).
Phractocephalus hemioliopterus Lundberg 1998:59-62 (phylogeny, biogeography).
Holotype. MCN.USB OL-2142, nearly complete, undistorted neurocranium plus most of the Weberian complex (broken into two pieces at the basioccipital). El Mamón oil field, 350 m north of oil well number 1, locality USB 56-FU, 11º 15´ N, 70º 13´ W, Urumaco Formation, middle member, Falcón State, northwestern Venezuela, O. Linares, E. Pannier & R. Sánchez, 1987.
Paratypes. All localities in Falcón State, northwestern Venezuela (Fig. 2). MCN.USB 72-85 PB, nearly complete neurocranium, margins partly chipped or eroded (specimen described by Lundberg et al., 1988). Locality USB 26-FU, 11º 15´ 00´´ N, 70º 13´ 00´´ W, Urumaco Formation, upper member.
UNEFM-PF-0365, three dimensional Weberian complex and supraoccipital. Tío Gregorio, locality UNEFM OA00-7, 11º, 14´ 31´´ N; 70º 18´ 40´´ W, Urumaco Formation, upper member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 2000.
UNEFM-PF-0158, cranium in two large and several small parts; slightly crushed and flattened, most margins chipped or broken. Anterior moiety includes mesethmoid, lateral ethmoids, frontals and sphenotics. Ventrally includes vomer and parasphenoid. Smaller posterior part includes supraoccipital (anterior part to frontal and partial supraoccipital process with all margins chipped). Associated bones including nearly complete right hyomandibula, right quadrate, left opercle and left cleithrum. El Hatillo, locality UNEFM OA94-7, 11º, 13´ 03´´ N; 70º 14´ 06´´ W, Urumaco Formation, middle member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 1994. UNEFM-PF-0363, right side, articulated, cleithrum, coracoid and pectoral spine. El Mamón, locality UNEFM OA01-11, 1000m west of oil field, upper Miocene Urumaco Formation (middle member), Falcón State, northwestern Venezuela, O. Aguilera & J. Lundberg, 2001.
UNEFM-PF-0311, partial left pectoral spine shaft (base missing). Quebrada El Mamón, locality UNEFM OA94-8, 11º 14´ 27´´ N, 70º 16´ 00´´ W, Urumaco Formation, middle member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 1994.
Non-type specimens. UNEFM-PF-0366 skull fragment. Tío Gregorio, locality UNEFM OA00-7, 11º 14´ 31´´ N, 70º 18´ 40´´ W, Urumaco Formation, upper member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 2000.
UNEFM-PF-0364 supraoccipital fragment. El Mamón, 500 m west of oil field, locality UNEFM OA01-12, Urumaco Formation, middle member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 2001. MCC-URU-2002-141, cranium in two large parts; slightly crushed and flattened, most margins chipped or broken. Anterior moiety includes mesethmoid, lateral ethmoids, frontals and sphenotics. Smaller posterior part includes supraoccipital (anterior part to frontal and partial supraoccipital process with all margins chipped). Tío Gregorio between Quebrada Tío Gregorio and Arcas fault, locality MCZ 141-72V, Urumaco Formation, upper member, B. Patterson, 1972.
UNEFM-PF-0159, nearly complete right cleithrum. Tío Gregorio, locality UNEFM OA00-7, 11º, 14´ 31´´ N; 70º 18´ 40´´ W, Urumaco Formation, upper member, O. Aguilera & R. Sánchez, 2000.
UNEFM-PF-0356, left side suspensorium, reassembled articulated bones including nearly complete hyomandibula, quadrate and part of metapterygoid. El Mamón, 1000 m northeast of oil field, locality UNEFM OA01-7, Urumaco Formation, middle member, O. Aguilera, J. Lundberg & R. Sánchez, 2001.
Locality, geological context and age. The sample area (Fig. 2) includes the following named localities: El Mamón, Tío Gregorio, Corralito and El Hatillo, all north of the town of Urumaco, Falcón State, northwestern Venezuela. The geological units from which the specimens were obtained are the middle and upper members of the Urumaco Formation of Venezuela. These units have been recently summarized in the Léxico estratigráfico de Venezuela (1997).
The middle member of the Urumaco Formation consists of claystone and sand. The gray claystone is microfossiliferous, and the brown claystone contains vertebrate remains such as reptiles, mammals, marine and freshwater fish, and also coprolites and wood (Díaz de Gamero & Linares, 1989). The limestone changes from conchiferous sandstones to consolidated coquina limestone. In the lower half of this middle member, an abundant and diverse marine mollusk fauna exists in a sandy matrix. This matrix also contains elasmobranch teeth and teleostean otoliths. The paleoenvironments are interpreted as inner sub-littoral and coastal lagoon enviroments with riverine and estuarine influence (Díaz de Gamero, 1996).
The upper member of the Urumaco Formation also comprises gray to brown often limey claystone with thin intercalated and locally conchiferous sandstones. The uppermost layer is referred to as the "capa de tortugas" because of its abundant remains of the turtle Bairdemys Gaffney & Wood. Several localities and levels have concentrations of vertebrate fossils. The vertebrate fauna includes marine, estuarine and freshwater fishes, terrestrial, freshwater and marine turtles and crocodilians, and terrestrial and aquatic/semiaquatic mammals (Sánchez-Villagra et al., 2003). The paleoenvironments were tropical near shore marine to low coastal savannas with freshwater rivers.
A Late Miocene age for the Urumaco Formation is indicated by foraminiferans, and the mammals suggest a South American land mammal age between Chasicoan and Huayquian (Díaz de Gamero & Linares, 1989), or approximately 9 Ma (Marshall & Sempere, 1993).
Diagnosis. 1) Ornamentation of posterior half of frontals and anterior half of supraoccipital with both reticulating ridges and pits, and equally coarse, elongate, nearly parallel ridges and sulci (Fig. 3a).
In modern P. hemioliopterus the corresponding central region of the skull roof is almost completely ornamented by reticulating ridges and pits, with few or no elongate, parallel ridges and sulci (Fig. 4a). In the Acre Phractocephalus the central region of the skull roof has many elongate ridges and sulci plus reticulating ridges and pits.
The mesethmoid bone of P. hemioliopterus is relatively narrow-necked, less extensively ornamented only centrally and posteriorly, and its anterior edge is emarginate or shallowly concave (Fig. 4a). The mesethmoid bone of the Acre Phractocephalus is similar to that of P. nassi.
3) Lateral ethmoid not excessively projecting anteriorly over palatine condyle; its lateral margin convex and eliminating orbital notch on margin of skull roof (Fig. 3a).
The lateral ethmoid bone of P. hemioliopterus is also not excessively projecting anteriorly over the olfactory region or palatine condyle; but it is concave laterally, and has a well defined orbital sulcus on the margin of skull roof (Fig. 4a). In the Acre Phractocephalus the lateral ethmoid projects far anteriorly over the olfactory region and palatine condyle; it is convex laterally, eliminating the orbital sulcus on margin of skull roof.
4) Anterior cranial fontanelle absent or represented by a small pit in epiphyseal region between frontals (Fig. 3a).
Modern P. hemioliopterus have an open anterior cranial fontanelle within a prominent depression of epiphyseal region (Fig. 4a), whereas in the Acre Phractocephalus the fontanelle and depression of the epiphyseal region are lacking.
5) Supraoccipital process with rounded lateral and posterolateral margins, posterior margin concave medially; supraoccipital process long, in dorsal view completely covering modified anterior vertebrae of Weberian complex (Fig. 3a).
In modern P. hemioliopterus the supraoccipital process is short, in dorsal view not completely covering modified vertebrae of Weberian complex; it has angular lateral and posterolateral margins, and its posterior margin is irregular to concave medially and bearing a deep unornamented extension below anterior nuchal plate (Fig. 4a). In the Acre Phractocephalus the supraoccipital process is long, completely covering the Weberian complex; its process has angular corners and straight lateral margins, and its posterior margin concave is slightly convex and lacks an unornamented extension below anterior nuchal plate.
6) Opercle almost completely covered with reticulating ridges and pits (Fig. 5a).
The opercle P. hemioliopterus is incompletely covered with reticulating ridges and pits (Fig. 5c). The opercle is thus far unknown in the Acre Phractocephalus.
7) Cleithrum with coarse ornamentation extending along ventral edge forming outward bulge or "shoulder" lateral to spine articulation; bulge of "shoulder" terminating posteriorly, in line with termination of articular socket of pectoral spine (Figs. 5e-g).
The cleithrum of P. hemioliopterus lacks coarse ornamentation along ventral edge of "shoulder," and the lateral bulge of "shoulder" terminates posterior to the level of articular socket of pectoral spine (Figs. 5i, j). No cleithrum of the Acre Phractocephalus has been found.
8) Pectoral spine ornamentation dominated by coarse subparallel ridges and sulci, and relatively few reticulating ridges and pits (Fig. 5h).
The pectoral spine ornamentation of P. hemioliopterus is dominated by reticulating ridges and pits (Fig. 5i). The pectoral spine of the Acre Phractocephalus is yet unknown.
Etymology. The Urumaco species of Phractocephalus is named for Dr. Pedro Nass in recognition of his contributions to the systematics and morphology of pimelodid catfishes of South America.
Description. See Lundberg et al. (1988) for description of neurocranium (MCN.USB 72-85 PB) and additional measurements. The following information is provided by the holotype and recently obtained specimens.
Neurocranium, dorsal aspect (Fig. 3a). Outline form of skull approximately rectangular, width across lateral ethmoids equal to width across sphenotics, and these widths slightly less than maximum width across pterotic wings; width across pterotics contained 2.25 times in (45% of) dorsal skull length from mesethmoid tip to posterior edge of supraoccipital process. Surface mostly flat but margins curved slightly downward and dorsal midline increasingly arched posteriorly. All bones ornamented with coarse reticulating ridges and circular pits and some longitudinally elongate ridges and grooves, except for olfactory capsules and extremities of mesethmoid cornua.
Mesethmoid broad, mushroom-shaped, anterior margin scarcely emarginate (entire in MCN.USB OL-2142), otherwise gently rounded; cornua stout, pointed, little recurved and reaching laterally to a parasagittal line projected before palatine condyle. Mesethmoid without traces of anterior cranial fontanelle. Lateral ethmoid projecting anteriorly into olfactory capsule region; orbital margin short, gently concave, antorbital process a slight curved bulge; contact with sphenotic a long, nearly straight suture running obliquely from skull roof margin behind orbit to frontal near anterior cranial fontanelle. Olfactory capsule floored by mesethmoid and lateral ethmoid. Nasal and infraorbitals unknown.
Frontal flat to slightly concave, confined to center of skull roof, laterally suturing to and excluded from skull-roof margin by lateral ethmoid and sphenotic. Anterior cranial fontanelle present as reduced circular foramen in a midline pit at transverse level of sphenotic-lateral ethmoid-frontal junction (fontanelle obsolete in MCN.USB OL-2142). Frontal ornamented mostly with reticulating ridges and circular pits, except near midline posterior to cranial fontanelle about 5 - 6 parallel longitudinally oriented ridges and grooves.
Sphenotic very large, twice the width of adjacent frontal, approaching a parallelogram in form, broadly sutured to lateral ethmoid, frontal, supraoccipital and pterotic; free lateral margin with a gently convex bulge but lacking prominent postorbital process. Pterotic with angular wing projecting from posterolateral corner; broadly contacting sphenotic, supraoccipital, extrascapula and supracleithrum, the last joint horizontally elongate suggesting limited mobility to dorsoventral axis.
Supraoccipital unusually large, flask-shaped; contacting frontals, sphenotics, extrascapulars, supracleithra and anterior nuchal plate (the last by inference from structure of posterior process and similarity to congeneric species). Expanded part of supraoccipital posterior process is posterior to occipital wall and articulations with upper shoulder girdle elements; process long, covering Weberian complex. Process with broadly rounded lateral and posterolateral margins, ornamented part posterior margin emarginate to truncate across midline, plus a projecting unornamented shelf that would form a lap joint with anterior nuchal plate. Ornamentation of supraoccipital mostly irregular but ridges and pits loosely arranged in 5 or 6 outer concentric rows. Dorsal surface flat behind frontals, then becoming convexly arched along midline to posterior margin, laterally sloping downward concavely to margins of posterior process; cross-sectional shape depressed "bell shaped."
Extrascapula an ovoid plate isolated from skull margin by surrounding pterotic, supracleithrum and supraoccipital. Supracleithrum preserved in holotype on right side where broken posterolaterally; expanded as roughly lozenge-shaped plate, ornamented as the skull roof; horizontally elongate, weak sutural joint with pterotic and extrascapula; arthrosis style with supraoccipital indeterminate.
Neurocranium, ventral aspect (Fig. 3b). Mesethmoid visible ventrally only as flattened, narrow band, anterior to vomerine tooth patch, to which premaxillae (not preserved) articulate; mesethmoid cornua not downwardly deflected. Vomer dominated by massive median tooth plate, approximately pentagonal form, surface concave upward and completely covered by minute pediculate tooth-attachment bases (no teeth preserved). Vomer expanded antrolaterally in front of tooth plate to suture with mesethmoid and lateral ethmoids; tapering posterior limb deeply sutured with parasphenoid.
Palatine condyle projecting prominently from lateral ethmoid, very long and in horizontal plane, convex anteriorly, nearly straight laterally, abruptly truncate posteriorly. Prominent, thin, horizontal "orbital shelf" arises on ventral surface of lateral ethmoid just posterior to palatine condyle and lateral to vomer. "Orbital shelf" continuing onto orbitosphenoid, parasphenoid and prootic to terminate ventral to trigeminofacial foramen; along lateral ethmoid and orbitosphenoid "orbital shelf" is the surface of origin for adductor arcus palatini muscle. Orbitosphenoid dominated by "orbital shelves," widest anteriorly, about 75% of skull width across lateral ethmoids, narrowing posteriorly to about 45% of skull width across sphenotics at level of hyomandibular facet. Foramina of orbitosphenoid deeply situated and indeterminate. Parasphenoid median stem broad, center of parasphenoid marked by medially converging pair of low ridges and elongate roughened surfaces (associated with contact of anterior branchial arches); parasphenoid weakly sutured to prootics, deeply sutured to basioccipital, indeterminate contact with pterosphenoid.
Anterior half of ventral surface of sphenotic planar and bare; posterior half of sphenotic sharply elevated laterally, forming anterior two-thirds of elongate, horizontal, trough-like hyomandibular facet that runs mediolaterally to sphenoticpterotic suture near skull roof margin, then along edge of pterotic. Hyomandibular facet on pterotic followed at rightangles by another articular facet, short, flat-faced and ventrally buttressed, for posterodorsal corner of hyomandibula. Neither pterosphenoid nor prootic participate in hyomandibular facet or other articulation with hyomandibula.
Medioventrally adjacent to hyomandibular facet, sphenotic, pterotic and prootic together form roof of ovoid, shallow subotic fossa.
Prootic side wall flat dorsal to contact with parasphenoid; position of matrix-filled trigeminofacial foramen indicated by semicircular notch in anterior border of prootic and sharp edged terminus of "orbital shelf" ventral to foramen. Pterosphenoid largely obscured by matrix but no evidence that it is more extensive than in modern species where it is restricted as a small quadrangular element between the prootic, sphenotic and orbitosphenoid.
Basioccipital weakly sutured to exoccipital and prootic; vertebral-like joint with first centrum. Articulation site on basioccipital for ossified Baudelot's ligament elevated and rugose. Exoccipital weakly sutures with basioccipital, prootic, pterotic and epioccipital; contributing small dorsal process to cranial articulation with Baudelot's ligament; vagal foramen large, circular, ventrally directed, centered on a vertical through the anterior edge of basioccipital-Baudelot's ligament joint. Baudelot's ligament of supracleithrum ossified and heavy; round in section medially near contact with basioccipital and exoccipital. Exoccipital and epioccipital forming sharp posterolateral corner of braincase that vertically buttresses expanded cranial articulation of pteroticsupracleithrum. Anterolateral face of epioccipital concave and weakly sutured to pterotic. Posterior end of pterotic wing produced and expanded ventral to cranial articulation of supracleithrum. Ventral side of supraoccipital posterior process with strong median vertical keel.
Suspensorium (Fig. 5k, l). Hyomandibula broad and deep, sutured to preopercle via lateroposterior flange, and metapterygoid via wide anterior process; anteriorly sutured and posteriorly synconchondrally jointed to quadrate. Cranial articulation of hyomandibula including slender anterodorsal process abutting weak ridge on sphenotic in front of hyomandibular facet; long, gently rounded condyle articulating with hyomandibular facet of sphenotic and pterotic; plus short, vertically-truncate posterodorsal surface articulating with pterotic behind hyomandibular facet. Lateral face with low, oblique rise between anterior process and preopercular flange, marking attachment limit of inner bundles of adductor mandibulae muscle. Low crest on medioposterior edge ventral to pterotic articulation, otherwise no enlarged articulating processes or muscle origin crests dorsal to opercle condyle. Opercle condyle centered slightly above midpoint on posterior margin; condyle twice as deep as wide. Lateral foramen of facial canal centrally located on anterior surface of adductor muscle crest at level of opercle condyle; medial foramen of facial canal anteriorly located above adductor arcus palatini crest. Medial face with centrally located vertical and crescentic adductor arcus palatini scar more prominent than in modern P. hemioliopterus (Fig. 5m) but is shape and placement similar.
Preopercle sutured to quadrate in addition to hyomandibula; lateral face shallowly concave forming fossa for posterior sections of adductor mandibulae muscle; posterior margin raised in a gentle curve and likely with sensory canal but no discernable lateralis pores; no evidence of external foramen for symplectic canal, but medial foramen of symplectic canal present between quadrate and preopercle.
Quadrate lateral face mostly shallowly concave; anteroventral blade broadly sutured to metapterygoid; mandibular condyle broad and strongly bilobed flanking central saddle, medial lobe of condyle braced by vertical buttress.
Anterior vertebrae (Fig. 3b). First centrum articulated to basioccipital and deeply sutured to compound or Weberian complex centrum (2-4). Aortic groove open along midventral line, flanked by low parallel ridges along first and compound centra; broken before centrum of vertebra 5. Weberian complex lacking prominent mid-dorsal vertical lamina; neural arch-spine complex incompletely preserved but anteriorly projecting to contact supraoccipital and exoccipitals. Indistinct pieces of tripus and low os suspensorium remain in place; anterior limbs of transverse processes meet compound centrum at right angle, wide and thickened laterally, broadly contacting ventral articulation flange of supracleithrum; vertebra 5 indeterminate.
Pectoral girdle (Figs. 5 e, f, g). Dorsal articulating process of cleithrum bifid, anterior limb longest, and overall similar in size to postcleithral process; postcleithral process deep and nearly equilaterally triangular, coarsely ornamented especially along ventral and ventrolateral edges lateral to articulating fossa of pectoral spine. In ventral view outward bulge of cleithrum in transverse alignment with posterior limit of articulating fossa of pectoral spine. Mesocoracoid not preserved but elevated surface near dorsal edge of coracoid shows its articulation site. Coracoid keel strongly elevated proximally, extending about midway to pectoral symphysis; coracoid keel divides jointed horizontal limbs of cleithrum and coracoid into equal halves; two parallel ridges run toward midline horizontal limbs of coracoid.
Pectoral spine shaft (Figs. 5 e, f, h) depressed, in section more ovoid than quadrangular, mostly covered by coarse, elongate and anastomosing ridges and grooves (neither mesh-like nor finely-striate); anterior dentations erect, blunt, none strongly antrorse, relatively heavy and about half as numerous as posterior dentations; posterior dentations erect and irregularly spaced, some transversely widened but not exceptionally flattened, sharper and fewer than anterior dentations; anterior and posterior dentation rows without deep trenches and flanking ridges; no anterior distal serrations; spine tip bluntly pointed; spine base robust but details indeterminate.
The pimelodid genus Phractocephalus has long been regarded as monotypic. The morphological variation among modern and well-preserved fossil skulls and some postcranial elements indicates that Phractocephalus comprises three species: P. hemioliopterus, P. nassi and the unnamed Neogene Acre Phractocephalus. These species are differentiated by well-preserved characteristics of dermal bone ornamentation and enlargement of the casque-like skull roof and occipito-nuchal bony plating. The Phractocephalus from the middle Miocene, Colombian La Venta fauna is too incompletely known (partial mesethmoid and partial pectoral spine) to assess its species status. Despite this new understanding of greater taxic diversity, the species of Phracto cephalus are closely similar in most details of their highly apomorphic cranial and pectoral-fin morphology. The Late Miocene P. nassi and the Acre fossil give a minimum age of about 8 or 9 Ma for the origin of the distinctive osteology of Phractocephalus and at least some species diversification within this small clade.
A thorough analysis of phylogenetic relationships among the species must await a detailed description of the Acre species. However, both P. nassi and Acre species have more hypertrophied skull and occipito-nuchal elements than modern P. hemioliopterus. The expanded dorsal armor plating can be interpreted as a synapomorphy uniting the two Miocene species. In this light the less extensive skull roof of modern P. hemioliopterus might be either a retained primitive condition within the genus (it is still a more derived condition than found in all other extant pimelodids), or a secondary reduction. Furthermore, in P. hemioliopterus the full reticulating ridge and pit style of dermal bone ornamentation is more derived than that of the fossils which retain more longitudinal ridges and groove ornament.
Despite its uncertain systematic placement within the genus, the La Venta Phractocephalus provides a minimum age of ca. 13.5 Ma for the genus and its sister group Leiarius Bleeker + Perrunichthys Schultz (Lundberg et al., 1988, 1991; Nass, 1991).
Today no Phractocephalus live west or north of the Andes or Venezuelan coastal ranges. The biogeographic significance of Late Miocene Phractocephalus from the northern Venezuelan Urumaco site was discussed by Lundberg et al. (1988) and subsequent authors (Aguilera, 1994; Lundberg, 1997, 1998; Sánchez-Villagra et al., 2003). Recognizing the Urumaco Phractocephalus as a distinct species does not alter the obvious conclusion that this catfish marks a former large freshwater connection between the Caribbean coastal region and the Orinoco system. Other Urumaco fossils show the same biogeographic relationship: mata-mata turtles (Chelus Dumeril), freshwater iniid dolphins, crocodilians (Caiman Spix), freshwater sciaenids (Plagioscion Gill), indeterminate doradids, loricariids, pimelodids and serrasalmine characins. The phylogenetic relationships of many modern endemic freshwater fish species or genera of the Maracaibo Basin also corroborate a former link to the Orinoco and more broadly with the Amazon and Magdalena system. Examples of these among the Pimelodidae are Perrunichthys perruno Schultz, sister to the OrinocoanGuianan-Amazonian genus Leiarius; Platysilurus malarmo Schultz and Cheirocerus abuelo (Schultz), belonging to monophyletic genera with species in the Orinoco, Amazon and Guianas; and Megalonema psammium Schultz and Sorubim cuspicaudatus Littmann, Burr, & Nass (belonging to genera with species in the Orinoco, Amazon, Guianas, Magdalena and Paraná).
The foregoing biotic relationships correlate well with current models of Neogene landscape and drainage evolution in northern South America. Rod (1981), Lundberg et al. (1988), and Díaz de Gamero (1996) discussed evidence for a major outlet of a paleo-Orinoco system into the Caribbean from northwestern Venezuela. A mounting body of evidence has now been presented for a long persistent, large river system originating far south in western Amazonia that flowed north in the Andean foreland basin (Hoorn, 1993, 1994 a, b, c; Hoorn et al., 1995; Lundberg et al., 1998). This "Paleo-Amazon-Orinoco" river system would have contained a common freshwater fauna including fish species represented as fossils from Urumaco (Aguilera & Rodrigues de Aguilera, 2003; Sánchez-Villagra et al., 2003). At times marine and estuarine conditions extended southward into the Andean foreland basin from the Caribbean (Hoorn, 1994 a, b, c; Monsch, 1998) thus providing some opportunities for marine taxa to penetrate far into the South American continent (Lovejoy et al., 1998). Sometime in the Late Miocene, the rising mountain divides of the Eastern Andes and Coastal Cordilleras closed the Caribbean outlet of the "Paleo-Amazon-Orinoco" system. Concomitant or subsequent to the isolation of the coastal region of Urumaco and Falcón State much of the former freshwater biota disappeared.
Additional fossil pimelodid, doradid, loricariid and characiform fishes from the Urumaco fauna are now available for study and should provide more information on the intriguing biotic and landscape histories of northern South America.
The paleo-environments within the Urumaco Formation are a complex mixture of freshwater, estuarine and marine. Deposition occurred on a relative narrow coastal plain. There is no indication of major reworking of fossil remains. Fossils of the "cajaro" catfish (Phractocephalus nassi) are often associated with remains of "sierra" catfishes (doradids), gavialids (Ikanogavialis Sill, Gryposuchus Gürich), crocodilians (Purussaurus Barbosa-Rodrigues, Mourasuchus Price), "arrau" turtles (Bairdemys Gaffney & Wood), sirenids (indeterminate dugongid) and "tonina" freshwater dolphin (indeterminate iniid). This entire fauna is relatively common in the freshwater facies from the Urumaco Formation, especially in the upper member. Present also in this assemblage are fossils of coastal fishes such as, sea catfish (Arius Valenciennes, Bagre Cloquet, Sciadeops Fowler) and sawfish (Pristis Linck) that often enter freshwaters.
We are very grateful to Omar Linares for providing us with access to the USB Phractocephalus specimens, Sergio Antillano to the MCC specimens and Jean Bocquentin-Villanueva to the UFAC specimens. We are grateful to Julio Reyes and Rodolfo Sánchez for their help during the fieldwork. Dione Rodrigues de Aguilera assisted us with laboratory work, Orangel Aguilera-Rodrigues and Kyle R. Luckenbill with digital imaging. Mark Sabaj, Wasila Dahdul and two anonymous reviewers offered useful comments on a draft of the paper. The photo of the fisherman with the "cajaro" catfish in a canoe is courtesy from Sr. Kike Arnal. The Universidad Nacional Experimental Francisco de Miranda, Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, and the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia provided support to O. Aguilera.
The U.S. National Science Foundation supported this work through a research grant to J. G. Lundberg (DEB0089612). Partial support of publication costs was provided by the All Catfish Species Inventory (NSF DEB0315963).
Aguilera S., O. A. 1994. Ictiofauna neogena del noroeste de Venezuela y su relación con el paleo-Orinoco y el paleo-Caribe. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Instituto de Zoologia Tropical, Universidad Central de Venezuela, 139p., 57 figs. [ Links ]
Aguilera, O. & D. Rodrigues de Aguilera. 2003. Two new otolith-based sciaenid species of the genus Plagioscion from the South American Neogene marine sediments. Journal of Paleontology, 77(6):937-942. [ Links ]
Berg, L. S. 1940. Classification of fishes both recent and fossil. Travaux de l'Institut Zoologique de l'Academie des Sciences de l'URSS, 5(2), 304 p. [ Links ]
Bloch, M. E. & J .G. Schneider. 1801. M. E. Blochii, Systema Ichthyologiae iconibus cx illustratum. Post obitum auctoris opus inchoatum absolvit, correxit, interpolavit Jo. Gottlob Schneider, Saxo. Berolini. Sumtibus Austoris Impressum et Bibliopolio Sanderiano Commissum. 584 p., 110 pl. [ Links ]
Bocquetin-Villanueva, J., M. Jégu & P. Brito. 1997. An extinct Phractocephalus species (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) from the Mio-Pliocene Solimões Formation of Acre State, Brazil. p. 56. Abstracts of International Symposium on Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes, Museu de Ciências e Tecnologia. PUCRS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. [ Links ]
Bornbusch, A. H. 1991. Monophyly of the catfish family Siluridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes), with a critique of previous hypotheses of the family's relationships. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101:105-120. [ Links ]
Díaz de Gamero, M. L. 1996. The changing course of the Orinoco River during the Neogene: a review. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology & Palaeoecology, 123: 385-402. [ Links ]
Díaz de Gamero, M. L. & O. J. Linares. 1989. Estratigrafía y paleontología de la Formación Urumaco, del Mioceno tardío de Falcón noroccidental. 7th. Congreso Geológico Venezolano, Memorias, 1:419-439. [ Links ]
Hoorn, C. 1993. Marine incursions and the influence of Andean tectonics on the Miocene depositional history of northwestern Amazônia: results of a palynostratigraphic study. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology & Palaeoecology, 105:267-309. [ Links ]
Hoorn, C. 1994a. Miocene palynostratigraphy and paleoenvironments of northwestern Amazônia: evidence for marine incursions and the influence of Andean tectonics. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Free University of Amsterdam, 156p. [ Links ]
Hoorn, C. 1994b. Fluvial palaeoenvironments in the intracratonic Amazon Basin (Early Miocene to early Middle Miocene, Colombia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology & Palaeoecology, 109:1-55. [ Links ]
Hoorn, C. 1994c. An environmental reconstruction of the palaeo-Amazon River system (middle-late Miocene, NW Amazônia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology & Palaeoecology, 112:187-238. [ Links ]
Hoorn, C., J. Guerrero, G. A. Sarmiento & M. A. Lorente. 1995. Andean tectonics as a cause for changing drainage patterns in Miocene northern South America. Geology, 23:237-240. [ Links ]
Latrubesse, E. M., J. Bocquentin-Villanueva, J. C. R. Santos & C. G. Ramonell. 1997. Paleoenvironmental model for the Late Cenozoic of Southwestern Amazonian: Paleontology and Geology. Acta Amazonica, 27(2):103-117. [ Links ]
Léxico Estratigráfico de Venezuela (L.E.V.). 1997. Léxico Estratigráfico de Venezuela (Tercera Edición). Ministerio de Energía y Minas, Boletín de Geología, 12, 828 p. [ Links ]
Lovejoy, N. R., E. Bermingham & A. P. Martin. 1998. Marine incursions into South America. Nature, 396: 421-422. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G. 1997. Fishes of the Miocene La Venta Fauna: additional taxa and their paleobiotic implications, p. 67-91. In: R. F. Kay, R. H. Madden, R. L. Cifelli & J. J. Flynn (Eds.), Vertebrate paleontology in the Neotropics: The Miocene fauna of La Venta, Colombia. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C. 592 p. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G. 1998. The Temporal Context for Diversification of Neotropical Fishes. Pp. 13-48. In: L. R. Malabarba, R. E.Reis, R. P.Vari, C. A. S. Lucena & Z. M. S. Lucena (Eds.). Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 603p. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G. & B. Chernoff. 1992. A fossil of the Amazon fish Arapaima (Teleostei: Arapaimidae) from the Miocene La Venta fauna of Colombia, South America. Biotropica, 24(1):2-14. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G., O. J. Linares, M. E. Antonio & P. Nass, 1988. Phractocephalus hemiliopterus (Pimelodidae, Siluriformes) from the Upper Miocene Urumaco Formation, Venezuela: a further case of evolutionary stasis and local extinction among South American fishes. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 8(2): 131-138. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G. & M. W. Littmann. 2003. Siluriformes: Family Pimelodidae - Long-whiskered catfishes. Pp. 437-452. In: S. Kullander, R. Reis & C. Ferraris (Eds.). Check List of Freshwater Fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 729p. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G., F. Mago-Leccia & P. Nass. 1991. Exallodontus aguanai, a new genus and species of Pimelodidae (Teleostei: Siluriformes) from deep river channels of South America and delimitation of the sub-family Pimelodinae. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 104(4):840-869. [ Links ]
Lundberg, J. G., L. G. Marshall, B. H. Guerrero, M. C. Malabarba & F. Wesselingh. 1998. The stage for Neotropical Fish Diversification: A History of Tropical South America Rivers. Pp. 13-48. In: L. R. Malabarba, R. E. Reis, R. P. Vari, Z. M. Lucena & C. A. S. Lucena (Eds.). Phylogeny and Classification of Neotropical Fishes. Porto Alegre, Edipucrs, 603p. [ Links ]
Marshall, L. G. & T. Sempere. 1993. Evolution of the Neotropical Cenozoic Land Mammal Fauna in its geochronologic, stratigraphic, and tectonic context. Pp. 329-392. In: Goldblatt, P. (Ed). Biological Relationships between Africa and South America: New Haven. Yale University Press, 630p. [ Links ]
Monsch, K. A. 1998. Miocene fish faunas from the northwestern Amazonian basin (Colombia, Peru, Brazil) with evidence of marine incursions. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology & Palaeoecology, 143:31-50. [ Links ]
Nass, P. E. 1991. Anatomía comparada del bagre cunaguaro Brachyplatystoma juruense (Boulenger, 1898), incluyendo un análisis filogenético de la familia Pimelodidae. Unpublished Ph. D. Dissertation, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas. 262p. [ Links ]
Rod, E. 1981. Notes on the shifting course of the ancient Rio Orinoco from Late Cretaceous to Oligocene time. GEOS, 26:54-56. [ Links ]
Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., O. Aguilera & I. Horovitz. 2003. The anatomy of the world's largest rodent. Science, 301(5640):1678-1679. [ Links ]
Spix, J.B. von & L. Agassiz. 1829. Selecta genera et species piscium quos in itinere per Brasiliam annos MDCCCXVIIMDCCCXX jussu et auspiciis Maximiliani Josephi I.... colleget et pingendso curavit Dr J. B. de Spix.... Monachii. xvi+ii+82p., 48 pl. [ Links ]
Received October 14, 2003
Accepted November 24, 2003