SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.3 issue3A new characid fish, Hyphessobryconhexastichos (Characiformes: Characidae) from Chapada dos Parecis, Mato Grosso, BrazilA poorly known case of watershed transposition between the São Francisco and upper Paraná river basins author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Neotropical Ichthyology

Print version ISSN 1679-6225On-line version ISSN 1982-0224

Neotrop. ichthyol. vol.3 no.3 Porto Alegre July/Sept. 2005

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1679-62252005000300014 

SCIENTIFIC NOTE

 

A non-digging zoobenthivorous fish attracts two opportunistic predatory fish associates

 

 

Cristina SazimaI; Alice GrossmanII

IDepartamento de Zoologia e Museu de História Natural, Caixa Postal 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-970 Campinas,SP, Brazil. e-mail: csazima@gmail.com
IIProjeto Tamar/Ibama, Alameda Boldró s/no, 53990-000 Fernando de Noronha, PE, Brazil

 

 


ABSTRACT

Following behaviour among reef fishes involves mostly a digging nuclear species while foraging, which attracts opportunistic followers preying on the exposed organisms. The flying gurnard Dactylopterus volitans preys on benthic animals, mostly crustaceans and small fishes, scratching and probing the bottom with the inner rays of its pectoral fins. We recorded the flying gurnard being followed by two opportunistic predators, the yellow jack Caranx bartholomaei and the coney Cephalopholis fulva at Fernando de Noronha, off northeast Brazil. Albeit not actually digging the substrate, the flying gurnard acts as a nuclear species by exploring algae tufts and by its wandering near the boulders and ledges, disturbing and flushing out hidden animals which thus become available to predation.

Key words: Nuclear forager, following behaviour, foraging association, reef fishes, Equatorial West Atlantic.


RESUMO

Entre os peixes recifais, uma espécie fossadora nuclear em atividade de forrageamento pode atrair seguidores oportunistas que se alimentam de organismos expostos pela atividade do nuclear. O coió-voador Dactylopterus volitans alimenta-se de animais bentônicos, principalmente crustáceos e pequenos peixes, explorando o substrato com os primeiros raios externos de suas nadadeiras peitorais. Registramos o coió sendo seguido por dois predadores oportunistas, a guarajuba Caranx bartholomaei e a piraúna Cephalopholis fulva, em Fernando de Noronha, ao largo da costa Nordeste do Brasil. Apesar de não agir como uma espécie fossadora do substrato, o coió atua como uma espécie nuclear por explorar os tufos de algas e também pela sua passagem próxima às rochas e lajes, espantando e desentocando animais escondidos que, assim, tornam-se vulneráveis aos predadores.


 

 

Reef fishes may form temporary feeding associations with other vertebrates as diverse as dolphins and turtles (Sazima et al., 2003; Sazima et al., 2004), but mostly associate with other fishes (Hobson, 1974; Fricke, 1975; Fishelson, 1977). Foraging associations are widespread among reef fishes and include examples as diverse as cleaning symbiosis, foraging groups of browsers, aggressive mimicry and following (Fishelson, 1977; Losey, 1978; Ormond, 1980; Lukoschek & McCormick, 2000).

Following behaviour comprises mostly a 'nuclear' predator stirring the bottom during its foraging, and opportunistic 'follower' fishes that are attracted by this activity (Fricke, 1975; Strand, 1988; Soares & Barreiros, 2003; Sazima et al., 2005a).The digging movements of a nuclear species usually attract these opportunistic fishes that feed on the exposed items (Fishelson, 1977; Ormond, 1980). The "clouds" of stirred sediment and the specific features of the nuclear fish are visual signals that seem to influence the followers' behaviour (Fricke, 1975; Fishelson, 1977; Diamant & Shpigel, 1985).

Albeit not actually digging in the substrate, the flying gurnard Dactylopterus volitans (Dactylopteridae) scratches and probes the bottom with the inner rays of its pectoral fins (Randall, 1968; Nelson, 1994). Herein we report on the association of the flying gurnard, and its opportunistic followers, the yellow jack, Caranx bartholomaei (Carangidae) and the coney, Cephalopholis fulva (Serranidae) at the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago, off Northeastern Brazil.

The associations were recorded at the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago (0350'S, 3225'W), about 345 km off NE Brazil (see Maida & Ferreira, 1997 for map and description). Behavioural interactions between D. volitans and its followers were recorded at the Baía do Sueste (for C. bartholomaei) and Praia da Conceição (for C. fulva), in August 2002 and June 2003 respectively. The first site has a sandy and gravel bottom interspersed with rocky ledges that are sparsely to thickly covered by brown foliose algae, red coralline algae and stony corals (see description and illustrations in Maida et al., 1995; Maida & Ferreira, 1997; Sanches & Bellini, 1999). The second site is a rocky shore with an adjacent sand flat, boulders and ledges covered mostly by green, brown and red algae, stony corals and fine sediment (I. Sazima, pers. comm.).

We recorded the associations while snorkelling, in two observation sessions, totalling 50 min of direct observation. We used focal animal samplings, in which all occurrences of specified actions were recorded (Altmann, 1974; Lehner, 1979). Besides records pencilled on plastic slates, behavioural events were photographed. During our observations we followed the wandering D. volitans individuals (N=2) and recorded the fish species that were associated with this nuclear. We tried not to disturb the foraging D. volitans or its followers, keeping a distance of 1.5 to 2.5 m from the observed individuals (see also Soares & Barreiros, 2003). Observation sessions were concentrated in the daytime.

We recorded two instances of following behaviour involving foraging individuals of D. volitans. In one record a Caranx bartholomaei (25 cm total length, TL) escorted the flying gurnard (20 cm TL) for about 20 seconds as it moved over a gravel substrate (Fig. 1). The second and more complete record on the flying gurnard foraging behaviour lasted about 20 minutes. Three individuals of Cephalopholis fulva (about 20 cm TL) followed the foraging D. volitans (30 cm TL) as it swam close to the bottom, inspecting algae tufts attached to the rocks. One C. fulva individual followed the flying gurnard for about 40 seconds, whereas the others left it after about 10 seconds.

 

 

On both records the flying gurnard wandered on the edge of the rocky reef inspecting mostly the rocky substrate as well as the sandy bottom. It displayed its characteristic dotted pattern of coloration while swimming or walking over rocky or gravel substrate (Fig. 1) but turned whitish while over sandy areas.

Some serranids are considered territorialist at some extent, or even aggressive (Froese & Pauly, 2005). However, the C. fulva individuals which simultaneously followed the flying gurnard displayed none aggressive interactions. Although C. bartholomaei could also be expected to display agonistic behaviour towards conspecifics, no other individual attempted to approach the flying gurnard during our record. The foraging nuclear could be considered as a 'moving feed-ing territory' and encourage aggressive behaviour among followers, as recorded for C. bartholomaei while following the stingray Dasyatis americana (Dasyatidae) at Fernando de Noronha (CS, pers. obs.).

Dactylopterus volitans is regarded as a bottom dweller inhabiting coral reefs and able to "walk" over the substrate using its thoracic-placed pelvic fins (Randall, 1968; Nelson, 1994). With the specialised inner rays of its huge fan-like pectoral fins, the flying gurnard scratches and probes in the sand and/or turn over small rock pieces or rubble while foraging (Randall, 1967, 1968; Smith, 1997). Albeit not actually dig-ging in the substrate while foraging, the flying gurnard plays the role of a nuclear predator and attracts attendant associates (see Lukoschek & McCormick, 2000 for a classification of following associations). The flying gurnard's role as a nuclear species resembles that of some large parrotfishes (Scaridae) and triggerfishes (Balistidae) which break up coral, lift and turn over stones and rubble, and thus attract mainly small wrasses (Labridae) that prey on the disturbed small benthic organisms, stirred particles and even faeces (Ormond, 1980; Sazima et al., 2005a).

The flying gurnard feeds primarily on benthic crustaceans and small fishes (Randall, 1967; Froese & Pauly, 2005), and we observed benthic animals disturbed by the wandering D. volitans, especially juvenile and/or small fishes, that withdrew upon its approach. Therefore, several prey become potentially available to opportunistic followers by the mere wandering of a flying gurnard. Therefore, D. volitans plays the role of a nuclear species not only while exploring algae tufts, pieces of rocks and rubble, but also while simply wandering on the reef, as in both situations it may disturb potential prey for its followers.

Species of Caranx may be considered as highly piscivorous predators (Randall, 1967), but some of these also display opportunistic feeding, with variable foraging tactics (Potts, 1980; Baird, 1993; Silvano, 2001). Moreover, Caranx latus, C. melampygus and C. ruber, were recorded acting as followers of nuclear predators (e.g., Potts, 1980; Baird, 1993; Silvano, 2001). Thus, C. bartholomaei, which additionally forages mostly near the bottom (Randall, 1967; CS, pers. obs.), would be expected to behave as a follower of nuclear species, in accordance with the opportunistic foraging known for several Carangidae species (Potts, 1980; Sazima, 1998).

Jacks are rovers, whereas groupers (Serranidae) are mostly sedentary and sit-and-wait predators (Randall, 1967). However, groupers are also versatile followers, which associate with diverse species of reef fishes including eels, and also octopuses and sea stars (Karplus, 1978; Diamant & Shpigel, 1985; Gibran, 2002). Cephalopholis fulva, already recorded as a follower (Francini-Filho et al., 2000; Gibran, 2002; Froese & Pauly, 2005), inhabits reef areas where it hides under ledges or inside caves, feeding on small fishes and crustaceans (Randall, 1967; Francini-Filho et al., 2000; Froese & Pauly, 2005). Being an inquisitive, alert and opportunistic predator, as other epinepheline groupers (Karplus, 1978; Diamant & Shpigel, 1985; Sazima et al., 2005b), the coney would be expected to inspect almost every moving animal, the more so a foraging flying gurnard.

Foraging associations in fishes can be highly diverse and complex, involving interactions between members of different trophic groups (Lukoschek & McCormick, 2000; Sazima et al., 2004, 2005a). The searobin Prionotus punctatus (Triglidae) is also a carnivorous species, with foraging behaviour similar to that displayed by D. volitans (Carvalho-Filho, 1999; Froese & Pauly, 2005), thus herein suggested as a potential nuclear species. Also, we suggest that additional reef fish species might associate with foraging D. volitans. Wrasses (Labridae), such as Halichoeres dimidiatus, H. poeyi and H. radiatus, highly versatile species and opportunistic foragers (Sazima et al., 1998; Jones, 2002; CS, pers. obs.), are likely such candidates.

 

Acknowledgements

We thank the Projeto Tamar and the Centro Golfinho Rotador (through J. M. Silva-Jr.) for logistical support at Fernando de Noronha Archipelago; the Ibama for issuing study permits at the Fernando de Noronha Archipelago; FAPESP and Fundação Pró-Tamar for financial support. CS is recipient of scholarship from the CNPq – Brasil.

 

Literature Cited

Altmann, J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour, 49: 227-265.        [ Links ]

Baird, T. A. 1993. A new heterospecific foraging association between the puddingwife wrasse, Halichoeres radiatus, and the bar jack, Caranx ruber: evaluation of the foraging consequences. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 38: 393-397.         [ Links ]

Carvalho-Filho, A. 1999. Peixes: costa brasileira. 3rd ed. Melro, São Paulo, 304 p.         [ Links ]

Diamant, A. & M. Shpigel. 1985. Interspecific feeding association of groupers (Teleostei: Serranidae) with octopuses and moray eels in the Gulf of Eilat (Aqaba). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 13: 153-159.         [ Links ]

Fishelson, L. 1977. Sociobiology of feeding behavior of coral fish along the coral reef of the Gulf of Elat (=Gulf of Aqaba), Red Sea. Israel Journal of Zoology, 26: 114-134.         [ Links ]

Francini-Filho, R. B., R. L. Moura & I. Sazima. 2000. Cleaning by the wrasse Thalassoma noronhanum, with two records of predation by its grouper client Cephalopholis fulva. Journal of Fish Biology, 56: 802-809.         [ Links ]

Fricke, H. W. 1975. The role of behaviour in marine symbiotic animals. Pp. 581-594. In: Jennings, D. H. & D. L. Lee (Eds.). Symbiosis, Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 29. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 633 p.         [ Links ]

Froese, R. & D. Pauly (Eds.). 2005. FishBase. World WideWeb electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org        [ Links ]

Gibran, F. Z. 2002. The sea basses Diplectrum formosum and D. radiale (Serranidae) as followers of the sea star Luidia senegalensis (Asteroidea) in southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology, 62(4A): 591-594.         [ Links ]

Hobson, E. S. 1974. Feeding relationships of teleostean fishes on coral reefs in Kona, Hawaii. Fishery Bulletin, 72: 915-1031.         [ Links ]

Jones, K. M. M. 2002. Behavioural overlap in six Caribbean labrid species: intra-and interspecific similarities. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 65: 71-81.         [ Links ]

Karplus, I. 1978. A feeding association between the grouper Epinephelus fasciatus and the moray eel Gymnothorax griseus. Copeia, 1978: 164.         [ Links ]

Lehner, P. N. 1979. Handbook of ethological methods. Garland STPM Press, New York, 403 p.         [ Links ]

Losey, G. S. 1978. The symbiotic behavior of fishes. Pp. 1-31. In: Mostofsky, D. I. (Ed.). The behavior of fish and other aquatic animals. Academic Press, New York.         [ Links ]

Lukoschek, V. & M. I. McCormick. 2000. A review of multispecies foraging associations in fishes and their ecological significance. Proceedings of the 9th International Coral Reef Symposium, 1: 467-474.         [ Links ]

Maida, M. & B. P. Ferreira. 1997. Coral reefs of Brazil: an overiew. Proceedings of the 8th International Coral Reef Symposium, 1: 263-274.         [ Links ]

Maida, M., B. P. Ferreira & C. Bellini. 1995. Avaliação preliminar do recife da Baía do Sueste, Fernando de Noronha, com ênfase nos corais escleractíneos. Boletim Técnico e Científico do CEPENE, 3: 37-47.         [ Links ]

Nelson, J. S. 1994. Fishes of the world. 3rd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 600 p.         [ Links ]

Ormond, R. F. G. 1980. Aggressive mimicry and other interspecific feeding associations among Red Sea coral reef predators. Journal of Zoology, London, 191: 247-262.         [ Links ]

Potts, G. W. 1980. The predatory behaviour of Caranx melampygus (Pisces) in the channel environment of Aldabra Atoll (Indian Ocean). Journal of Zoology, London, 192: 323-350.         [ Links ]

Randall, J. E. 1967. Food habits of reef fishes of the WestIndies. Studies on Tropical Oceanography, 5: 665-847.        [ Links ]

Randall, J. E. 1968. Caribbean reef fishes. T.H.F. Publications, New Jersey, 318 p.         [ Links ]

Sanches, T. M. & C. Bellini. 1999. Juvenile Eretmochelys imbricata and Chelonia mydas in the Archipelago of Fernando de Noronha, Brazil. Chelonian Conservation and Biology, 3: 308-311.         [ Links ]

Sazima, C., R. M. Bonaldo, J. P. Krajewski & I. Sazima. 2005a. The Noronha wrasse: a jack-of-all-trades follower. Aqua, Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology, 9: 97-108.         [ Links ]

Sazima, C., A. Grossman & I. Sazima. 2004. The moving gardens: reef fishes grazing, cleaning, and following green turtles in SWAtlantic. Cybium, 28(1): 47-53.         [ Links ]

Sazima, I. 1998. Field evidence for suspension feeding in Pseudocaranx dentex, with comments on ram filtering in other jacks (Carangidae). Environmental Biology of Fishes, 53: 225-229.         [ Links ]

Sazima, I., J. P. Krajewski, R. M. Bonaldo & C. Sazima. 2005b. Wolf in a sheep's clothes: juvenile coney (Cephalopholis fulva) as an aggressive mimic of the brown chromis (Chromis multilineata). Neotropical Ichthyology, 3(2): 315-318.         [ Links ]

Sazima, I., R. L. Moura & J. L. Gasparini. 1998. The wrasse Halichoeres cyanocephalus (Labridae) as a specialized cleaner fish. Bulletin of Marine Science, 63: 605-610.         [ Links ]

Sazima, I., C. Sazima & J. M. Silva-Jr.2003. The cetacean offal connection: feces and vomits of spinner dolphins as a food source for reef fishes. Bulletin of Marine Science, 72(1): 151-160.         [ Links ]

Silvano, R. A. M. 2001. Feeding habits and interspecific feeding associations of Caranx latus (Carangidae) in a subtropical reef. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 60: 465-470.         [ Links ]

Smith, C. L. 1997. National Audubon Society Field Guide to Tropical Marine Fishes of the Caribbean, the Gulf of Mexico, Florida, the Bahamas, and Bermuda. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, 720 p.         [ Links ]

Soares, M. S. C. & J. P. Barreiros. 2003. Following associa-tions with the striped red mullet Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 (Perciformes: Mullidae) from the Azores. Aqua, Journal of Ichthyology and Aquatic Biology, 7: 139-144.         [ Links ]

Strand, S. 1988. Following behavior: interspecific foraging associations among Gulf of California reef fishes. Copeia, 1988(2): 351-357.        [ Links ]

 

 

Received May 2005
Accepted August 2005

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License