INTRODUCTION
The Neotropical region has the largest repository of freshwater fish species that correspond to about 16% of the world’s fish biodiversity (Albert, Reis, 2011; Reis et al., 2016). This biodiversity has enormous ecological relevance and economic importance, as many of these species represent a fishery and aquaculture resource (Hilsdorf, Hallerman, 2017). One of the most represented fish groups present in the hydrographic basins of this geographic region is Characiformes. This order includes exclusively freshwater fishes distributed in both Africa and America and shows its greatest diversity in the Neotropical Region (Malabarba, 1998; Nelson et al., 2016). Characiformes comprises 2,081 valid species grouped into 23 families, mostly in Characidae (1,214 species) (Fricke et al., 2020a). Parodontidae is a relatively small family distributed throughout South America and part of Panama (Nelson et al., 2016), and includes 32 species (Fricke et al., 2020a) organized in three genera: Apareiodon Eigenmann, 1916 (N = 15), Parodon Valenciennes, 1850 (N = 14) and Saccodon Kner, 1863 (N = 3) that differ due to some subtle morphological characters (Pavanelli, 2003).
Cytogenetic studies in Parodontidae cover about 50% of recognized valid species (Tab. 1), representing only two genera: Apareiodon and Parodon. Although the available data show that these fishes have a conserved diploid number (2n) of 54 chromosomes, differences in the number of chromosome arms (FN) and extensive variation in the position of 18S and 5S rDNA sites exist. Besides this, species with proto sex chromosomes are found together with others characterized by ZZ/ZW and ZZ/ZW1W2 multiple sex chromosome systems (Tab. 1). Sex chromosomes show different sizes among the Parodontidae species (Moreira-Filho et al., 1993; Rosa et al., 2006; Vicari et al., 2006; Bellafronte et al., 2009), but in all the ZW species, the W chromosome is a subtelocentric chromosome almost entirely heterochromatic, whereas the Z is smaller and usually shows heterochromatic regions only in the distal segmental portion of its short arms. The use of satellite DNA and transposable elements as probes showed that the differentiation of the sex chromosomes in the family is associated with the accumulation of these repeated sequences (Bellafronte et al., 2011; Schemberger et al., 2011, 2016; Nascimento et al., 2018).
TABLE 1 | Cytogenetic characteristics in Parodontidae. 1. Moreira Filho et al., 1980; 2. Moreira Filho et al., 1985; 3. Jesus et al., 1999; 4. Jorge, Moreira-Filho, 2000; 5. Bellafronte et al., 2009; 6. Bellafronte et al., 2011; 7. Schemberger et al., 2011; 8. Leite, Maistro, 2004; 9. Calgaro et al., 2004; 10. Traldi et al., 2016; 11. Traldi et al., 2019; 12. Bellafronte et al., 2012; 13. Moreira-Filho et al., 1984; 14. Vicari et al., 2006; 15. Santos et al., 2019; 16. Rosa et al., 2006; 17. Moreira-Filho et al., 1993; 18. Centofante et al., 2002; 19. Bellafronte et al., 2005; 20. Paula et al., 2017.
Genus/Species | Locality/River, State | 2n | Karyotype formula | Sex system | Ribosomal gene-bearing chromosomes | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male | Female | 18S rDNA (pair) | 5S rDNA (pair) | |||||
Apareiodon | ||||||||
A. affinis (Steindachner, 1879) | Rio Passa Cinco (SP) Brazil | 54/55 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 51 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW1W2 | 26 (st) | 8 (m) | 1-7 |
A. affinis | Rio Sapucai (MG), Brazil | 54/55 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 51 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW1W2 | 26 (st) | 8 | |
A. affinis | Rio Paraná (MP) Argentina | 54/55 | 40-42 m/sm, 12 st | 43/47 m/sm, 8-12 st | Absence | 9 | ||
A. argenteusPavanelli & Britski, 2003 | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | Absence | 2 (m) | 18 (m) | 10 |
A. argenteus | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | Absence | 10, 11 | ||
A. cavalcantePavanelli & Britski, 2003 | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 10, 11 | ||
A. davisi Fowler, 1941 | Rio Salgado (CE) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | Absence | 4, 9, 14, 17 (m) | 4, 9, 14, 17(m) | 10, 11 |
A. hasemani Eigenmann, 1916 | Rio São Francisco (MG) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | ZZ/ZW | 7, 22 ,11 (st) | 14 (m) | 12 |
A. ibitiensis Amaral Campos, 1944 | Ribeirão Araras (MG) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 14 (m), 26 (st) | 9 (m) | 5, 6 |
A. ibitiensis | Rio Passa Cinco (SP) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 26 (st) | 4 | |
A. ibitiensis | Rio Passa Cinco (SP) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 6, 14, 15, 26 (st) | 9 (m) | 5, 6 |
A. ibitiensis | Rio Piumi (MG) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 7 | ||
A. ibitiensis | Rio Verde (PR) Brazil | 54 | 48 m/sm, 6 st | 47 m/sm, 7 st | ZZ/ZW | 7 | ||
A. machrisi Travassos, 1947 | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 10 | ||
A. piracicabae (Eigenmann, 1907) | Rio Passa-Cinco/Mogi-Guaçu (SP) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 27 (st) | 9 (m) | 2, 3, 6, 13 |
A. piracicabae | Rio Piumhi (MG) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 27 (st) | 7 | |
Apareiodon sp. | Rio Verde (PR) Brazil | 54 | 48 m/sm, 6 st | 47 m/sm, 7 st | ZZ/ZW | 25 (st) | 9 (m) | 5, 6, 14 |
Apareiodon sp. | Rio Aripuanã (MT) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 2, 5, 9, 26, 27 (m) | 6 (m) | 15 |
Apareiodon sp. A | Rio Frio (MG) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 26 (st) | 4 | |
Apareiodon sp. B | Rio Barreiro (MG) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 26 (st) | 45 | |
Apareiodon sp. C | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 4 | ||
A. vittatus Garavello, 1977 | Rio Jordão (PR) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 27 (st), additional 14 (m) | 9 (m) | 4, 6 |
A. vittatus | Rio Jordão (PR) Brazil | 54 | 52 m/sm, 2 st | 52 m/sm, 2 st | Absence | 7 | ||
A. vladii Pavanelli, 2006 | Rio Piquiri (PR) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 26 (st) | 9 (m), additional 3 (m) | 6, 16 |
A. vladii | Rio Piquiri (PR) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | ZZ/ZW | 7 | ||
Parodon | ||||||||
P. hilarii Rheinhardt, 1867 | Córrego do Porta (MG) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 53 m/sm, 1 st | ZZ/ZW | 16 (m) | 11 (m) | 6, 7, 17 |
P. moreirai Ingenito & Buckup, 2005 | Córrego Paiol Grande (SP) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | ZZ/ZW | 15 (m) | 11 (m) | 6, 7, 18 |
P. nasus Kner, 1859 | Rio Passa Cinco (SP) Brazil | 54 | 48 m/sm, 6 st | 48 m/sm, 6 st | Absence | 25 (st) | 25 (st) | 2, 6, 13, 19 |
P. nasus | Rio Três Bocas (PR) Brazil | 54 | 54 m/sm | 54 m/sm | Absence | 2 (m) | 20 | |
P. nasus | Rio Paraguai (MT) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 7 | ||
P. pongoensis (Allen, 1942) | Rio Taquaralzinho (MT) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 2 (m) | 9 (m) | 6, 7 |
Parodon cf. pongoensis | Rio Araguaia (GO) Brazil | 54 | 50 m/sm, 4 st | 50 m/sm, 4 st | Absence | 10, 11 | ||
Saccodon | ||||||||
S. wagneri Kner, 1863 | Río Bonito (El Guabo) / El Oro Ecuador | 54 | 32 m, 16 sm, 6 st | 31 m, 16 sm, 7 st | ZZ/ZW | 14 (m) | 14 (m) | Present study |
The genus Saccodon is cytogenetically unexplored and contains only three valid species: S. dariensis (Meek & Hildebrand, 1913) distributed in Colombia and Panama, S. terminalis (Eigenmann & Henn, 1914) that lives in the Daule River Basin in Ecuador, and S. wagneri Kner, 1863 that inhabits the coastal basins of Ecuador and northern Peru (Pavanelli, 2003). This last one was previously known as S. cranocephalum Thominot, 1882 and Parodon ecuadoriensis Eigenmann & Henn, 1914, now considered synonym (Fricke et al., 2020b). Saccodon wagneri is adapted to live in rivers that flow rapidly with rocky bottoms near the mountains and generally above 100 m altitude (Roberts, 1974), often forming schools when swims in rapid waters (Glodek, 1978). Saccodon wagneri specimens easily adapt to confinement in aquariums where they eat algae and even balanced food, so that they could also be considered as aquarium fish, similarly to other Parodontiidae. Indeed, some species of this family as Apareiodon affinis (Steindachner, 1879), Parodon pongoensis (Allen, 1942), and P. suborbitalis Valenciennes, 1850, are included in the pet trade (Prang, 2008) and advertised on websites dedicated to the sale of aquarium fish (https://www.aquariumglaser.de/en/fish-archives/apareiodon_affinis_en/).
In the present study, we performed a cytogenetic survey of S. wagneri based on both conventional (Giemsa staining, silver staining, C-banding) and molecular (repetitive DNA mapping methods). The study aims to verify whether morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes, that are present in some Apareiodon and Parodon species, can be identified also in the genus Saccodon and whether chromosome number and main karyotype structure are conserved in this genus. A comparative analysis of cytogenetic data on this species and the remaining Parodontidae is presented here.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Eleven individuals (2 males and 9 females) of S. wagneri, from the Río Bonito, El Guabo, El Oro Province, 03°07’55”S 79°45’00”W, were sampled (Fig. 1). The fishes were collected with cast nets and placed in plastic bags filled up to a third of their capacity with water and oxygen the remaining two thirds, transported in cardboard boxes to the laboratory where they were confined in aquariums provided with constant aeration until they were processed.
Mitotic chromosomes were obtained from kidney cells suspension following the conventional air-drying method (Nirchio, Oliveira, 2006). The animals were stimulated to increase the number of metaphases with an injection of yeast-glucose suspension (Lozano et al., 1988) in the caudal peduncle 48 h before being processed. Each fish was injected with 0.0125% colchicine (1.0 ml/100 g of body weight) 50 min before being sacrificed with an overdose of benzocaine (Leary et al., 2013).
Voucher specimens are preserved and deposited in the Ichthyology Collection of the Laboratório de Biologia e Genética de Peixes (LBP) of Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil (UNESP) (collection numbers LBP 26871-26874) and Universidad Técnica de Machala, El Oro, Ecuador (collection numbers UTMACH-0398-0399).
The metaphases were stained with 5% Giemsa solution to define the 2n and the karyotype formula. C-positive heterochromatic regions were identified by the C-banding procedure, following Sumner (1972), while the nucleolus organizer regions (NORs) were identified using silver nitrate impregnation (Howell, Black, 1980) after Giemsa staining.
The 5S rDNA and 18S rDNA (ribosomal genes), and telomeric repeats were mapped onto chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (Pinkel et al., 1986). Probes were obtained and labeled by PCR from the genome of Hypsolebias flagellatus (Costa, 2003) using the primers described by Pendas et al. (1995) for 5S rDNA, Utsunomia et al. (2016) for 18S rDNA and Ijdo et al. (1991) for telomeric repeats. The 5S rDNA and telomeric probes were labeled with biotin-16-dUTP (2’-deoxyuridine 5’-triphosphate), and the 18S rDNA probes were labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP. Signals were detected with fluorescein-conjugated avidin (Sigma-Aldrich, www.sigma-aldrich.com) and antidigoxigenin-rhodamine conjugate (Roche Diagnostics, www.roche.com), respectively. Chromosomes were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole included in the Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories, Ltd., Peterborough, UK).
Images capture of chromosome spread after Giemsa, silver staining (Ag-NORs), and C-bands (constitutive heterochromatin), was performed under a CX31 Olympus microscope equipped with a Moticam 10+ digital camera coupled to a Motic Images Plus 2.0 software. FISH metaphases were analyzed under an Olympus BX53 epifluorescence microscope (Olympus Corporation, Ishikawa, Japan) with the appropriate filters; images were captured with an Olympus DP73 digital camera coupled to cellSens Dimension Software (Olympus) for image acquisition. Images were merged and edited to optimize the brightness and contrast using the Photoshop CS5 program (Adobe Systems, www.adobe.com). At least 30 metaphase spreads per individual were analyzed to confirm the diploid number, karyotype structure and FISH results. Chromosomes were classified as metacentric (m), submetacentric (sm), or subtelocentric (st) according to their arm ratios (Levan et al., 1964).
RESULTS
The diploid number of S. wagneri is 2n = 54 chromosomes for males and females, although differences in the FN are present between sexes. Indeed, the karyotype is composed of 31m + 16sm + 7st chromosomes in females, with FN = 101 (Fig. 2A), and of 32m + 16sm + 6st, FN = 102 (Fig. 2B) in males. This is due to the presence of morphologically differentiated sex chromosomes, i.e., to a heteromorphic ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system. The Z chromosome is submetacentric while the W is metacentric and almost twice as large as the Z (Fig. 2).

FIGURE 2 | Saccodon wagneri Giemsa karyotypes. A. Female; B. Male. Sex chromosomes are indicated. The NOR-carrying chromosomes, after silver staining, are boxed.
Sequential Giemsa and silver nitrate staining revealed a single pair of Ag-NOR positive marks located at the tip of the short arms of a small metacentric chromosome pair, probably pair 14 (Fig. 2, boxes).
C-banding revealed regions of centromeric heterochromatin in most chromosomes, as well as the presence of interstitial and terminal C-positive bands (Fig. 3). A large heterochromatic block is present on the half-distal part of the long arms of W chromosome in the female metaphases (Fig. 3B); a similar band is absent in the Z chromosome.

FIGURE 3 | Saccodon wagneri C-banded metaphases. A. Female; B. Male. The arrows indicate the sex chromosomes.
In situ hybridization using the 18S rDNA probe confirmed the presence of a single cluster of major ribosomal genes, localized on a small metacentric chromosome pair, likely coinciding with the Ag-NOR signals. Minor ribosomal genes were located on this same chromosome pair, just below the major rDNA cluster, in a syntenic condition (Fig. 4A).

FIGURE 4 | Saccodon wagneri metaphase plates after A. Double FISH with 5S rDNA (green-thin arrows) and 18S rDNA (red-thick arrows) probes; B. FISH using telomeric probes showing positive signals in the terminal positions of all chromosomes.
FISH with the telomeric repeat probe (TTAGGG)n (Fig. 4B) revealed hybridization signals only in the telomeric regions of all chromosomes, without the presence of interstitial telomeric sites (ITSs).
DISCUSSION
Recent characiform phylogenomic studies showed that Parodontidae originated about 70 million years ago (mya) and the first recognized cladogenesis occurred about 40 mya, separating Saccodon (an exclusive trans-Andean group) from Parodon and Apareiodon (wide-spread groups in the Neotropical region) (Bruno F. Melo, 2020, pers. comm.). The cytogenetics data on Parodontidae reveal a conservative 2n = 54 karyotype, that is composed predominantly of metacentric and submetacentric chromosomes (except for Apareiodon affinis, where females present 2n = 55 due to the unique ZW1W2 sex system) (Moreira Filho et al., 1980) (Tab. 1). Results here obtained on Saccodon wagneri reinforce this picture, despite the ancient divergence of this genus within the family. Moreover, other Neotropical fishes closely related to Parodontidae, e.g., families Anostomidae, Prochilodontidae, Chilodontidae, and Curimatidae (Betancur et al., 2019; Bruno F. Melo, 2020, pers. comm.), also share this feature, i.e., almost all species with 54 chromosomes, mainly metacentrics and submetacentrics, with a few exceptions (Arai, 2011). These data indicate an ancient origin of such a karyotype, whose conservatism has been related to the population structures of these fishes, as they include many long migratory species able to form large schools (Oliveira et al., 1988).
A morphologically well-differentiated ZZ/ZW sex chromosome system is present in approximately half of all Parodon and Apareiodon species analyzed so far (Moreira-Filho et al., 1993; Rosa et al., 2006; Vicari et al., 2006; Bellafronte et al., 2009; Kitano, Peichel, 2012). The occurrence of such sex system, characterized by an enlarged metacentric W chromosome, in S. wagneri points to its old origin inside Parodontidae. Besides this, and as frequently observed in higher vertebrates (Schartl et al., 2016), rather than showing a size reduction, the sex-specific W chromosome in Parodontidae is larger than the Z, because of a huge heterochromatin amplification. Despite these common features, the W chromosomes have evolved to different shapes and sequence contents among Parodontidae species. Two main questions remain unanswered, i.e., whether (i) the Z and W chromosomes have a common origin, representing the same linkage group in all species and (ii) the absence of sex chromosomes in some species may represent a derived character, probably related to sex chromosomes turnovers, as already documented in other fishes (Kitano, Peichel, 2012). Our data reinforce the hypothesis that this common ZW system has an ancient origin and it seems possible that the putative absence in some Parodontidae species would be related to subsequent specific chromosome differentiation. Further studies will make it possible to confirm the validity of this hypothesis.
In all the Parodontidae species studied so far, the presence of a single pair of NOR bearing chromosomes is the common condition, with few exceptions (Bellafronte et al., 2011). However, different locations of these genes have been observed among the species, probably as the result of chromosomal rearrangements (pericentric inversion), occurred along with the diversification of their karyotypes. The presence of multiple sites reported in Apareiodon davisi (Traldi et al., 2016), and A. ibitiensis (Bellafronte et al., 2009; Bellafronte et al., 2011) represents an exception, that has been attributed to the presence of transposable elements (Bellafronte et al., 2011). The syntenic arrangement of the 18S and the 5S rDNA genes detected in S. wagneri, has only been reported in two other Parodontidae species, named A. davisi (Traldi et al., 2016) and P. nasus (Bellafronte et al., 2005), and does not represent a common condition in fishes (Sochorová et al., 2018). Indeed, the presence of these genes on different chromosomes/sites in fishes and in the majority of vertebrates has been interpreted in the light of their functional dynamics (Martins, Galetti, 1999) and efficiency in evolution processes associated with multiple tandem arrays (Martins, Wasko, 2004).
FISH with the telomeric probe (TTAGGG)n in S. wagneri revealed hybridization signals only in the telomeric regions of all chromosomes in females and males, without Interstitials Telomeric Sequences (ITSs) that might result from the occurrence of recent Robertsonian fusions or other chromosomal rearrangements (Ocalewicz, 2013). This evidence, the common localization of constitutive heterochromatin (Moreira-Filho et al., 1984; Jesus, 2000; Jesus, Moreira-Filho, 2000; Vicente et al., 2001, 2003; Centofante et al., 2002; Bellafronte et al., 2005; Rosa et al., 2006; Vicari et al., 2006), and the constancy of 2n suggest that diversification in Parodontidae karyotypes has not involved macro-structural reorganizations but rather microstructural ones.
In conclusion, our study, the first one to report cytogenetic data on a Saccodon species both by conventional and molecular protocols, reinforces the hypothesis of karyotype homeostasis in fishes of the family Parodontidae, by conserving the basic diploid number and chromosome formulae. The synteny of both 18S and 5S rDNA found in S. wagneri represents an uncommon trait, and its presence in species of the other two genera (A. davisi and P. nasus), suggests its ancient origin, i.e., that this is a symplesiomorphic character within the family. As an alternative hypothesis, this similarity could be due to a homoplasic condition, obtained by parallelism. Further studies with chromosomal painting, sequence analysis of microdissected sex chromosomes, and comparative mapping of transposable elements will be useful to obtain a more complete picture of the evolution of karyotype and sex chromosomes within Parodontidae.