SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.13 número1Efeitos da quiropraxia em pacientes com cervicalgia: revisão sistemáticaUltrassom estático e terapia manual para tratamento da enxaqueca refratária. Relato de caso índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista Dor

versão impressa ISSN 1806-0013

Rev. dor vol.13 no.1 São Paulo jan./mar. 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-00132012000100014 

REVIEW ARTICLE

 

Opioid receptors to date*

 

 

Rodrigo Tomazini MartinsI; Daniel Benzecry de AlmeidaII; Felipe Marques do Rego MonteiroIII; Pedro André KowacsIV; Ricardo RaminaV

IResident in Neurology, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR, Brazil
IINeurosurgeon and Head of the Pain Service, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR, Brazil
IIIResident in Neurology, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR, Brazil
IVNeurologist and Head of the Neurology Service, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR, Brazil
VNeurosurgeon and Head of the Neurology Service, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR, Brazil

Correspondence to

 

 


SUMMARY

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Due to the objective of the outpatient setting and to routinely used drugs, this study aimed at reviewing and updating the knowledge about opioid receptors and worked as a study complement after a lecture presented to team members.
CONTENTS: We have reviewed from historical aspects to most recent developments about opioid receptors, in addition to describing subtypes and action mechanisms. For such, Pubmed-indexed references were queried.
CONCLUSION: After reviewing current literature data, we have concluded that there is still a lot to be researched about the topic, aiming at safer drugs, and new biomolecular techniques are still needed.

Keywords: History of medicine, Morphine, Morphine receptors, Opioid antagonists, Opioid receptors, Opioids, Opium, Poppy.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Since ancient times, opium has been used by different cultures, both as therapeutic formulae component and with recreational purposes. With the advances of biomolecular techniques and consequent discovery of opioid receptors, there has been further understanding of its effects and the possibility of synthesizing new derivatives with major impact on the population due to the possibility of treating pain in an unprecedented way. The laboratory identification of opioid receptors has contributed a lot for this evolution and is the current focus of several researches for the discovery of new receptors and their subtypes, in the hope to understand different therapeutic and side effects of this class of drugs, to allow the development of more specific and more tolerable drugs.

 

OPIOIDS: HISTORICAL ASPECTS

Opium is known since ancient times and has been used by humans probably before the written history. There are archeological images suggesting its use by Sumerian cultures. In addition, several studies show that most ancient peoples already knew and used this substance including Assyrians, Arabs, Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Chinese and Persians.

Since 3400 b.C., poppy seems to have been cultivated in Mesopotamia. Sumerians refer to it as Hul Gil, the "plant of joy" and they would soon teach Assyrians about the euphoric effects of this vegetal extract. This art would be transferred to Babylonians who, in turn, would transfer their knowledge to Egyptians1-3.

In 1300 b.C., in the capital of Thebes, Egyptians started to grow opium thebaicum. Opium trade flourished during the reign of Tutmes IV, Akhenaten and Tutankhamun. Trade route would include Phoenicians, who would transport the item to the Mediterranean sea and Europe1,4.

Hippocrates, in 460 b.C., rejected opium magic attributes, but agreed that it was useful as narcotic. In 330 b.C., Alexander, the Great, introduced opium to people of Persia and India. Religious Hindu hymns (Vedas) already mentioned opium powers. Several old medical texts, such as those described by Avicenna and Galen, revealed its use as potent analgesic1-3.

Opium thebaicum is introduced for the first time in China by Arab merchants in 400 b.C. In the 12th century, old Indian medical treatises such as Sarangdhar Samhita, describe opium for diarrhea and sexual dysfunctions.

Around 1500, Portuguese start the habit of smoking opium. Effects were instantaneous. One century after, Persians and Indians start to eat and drink opium blends with recreational purposes.

In the early 16th century, opium is reintroduced in the European medical literature by Paracelsus as laudanum: an opium, citric juices and gold quintessence blend. Called black pills or "Immortality Pills", they were made of thebaicum, being prescribed as analgesics1-3,5.

In 1680, British botanic Thomas Sydenham, after studying poppy varieties, introduced Laudanum Sydenham, a compound of opium, cherry wine and herbs, recommending it as powerful analgesic and antidiarrheal, and states: "from all drugs that powerful God has given to men to relief suffering, none is so universal and effective as opium"1,2,5.

In mid 18th century, Linnaeus, disciple of Paracelsus, was the first to classify poppy, Papaver somniferum – "sleep inducer". Its extraction is through its latex, removed from small scarifications on its still green flowers, from which a milky liquid flows. Most traditional varieties have in this juice up to 10% of medicinal alkaloids, especially morphine in addition to other substances such as thebaine, codeine, papaverine and noscapine, identified years later1,2,6.

In 1803, Friedrich Sertürner, in Germany, discovered the opium active ingredient, dissolving it in acid and then neutralizing it with ammonia. The result: an alkaloid – principium somniferum, or morphine. Some years later, in 1827, Merck & Co. company in Germany started the commercial production of morphine. In 1843, Alexander Wood, from Edinburgh, Scotland, discovered a new way to administer morphine using a syringe. Its effects were instantaneous and three times more potent1,2.

Charles Romley A. Wright, British researcher was the first to synthesize heroin, or diacetylmorphine in 1874, by boiling morphine. In the early 19th century, in several medical journals, physicians discussed the side effects of heroin and its withdrawal symptoms1,2.

Currently, Australia, Turkey and India are the largest opium producers for medicinal purposes.

 

RECEPTORS

Since mid 20th century there was the concept of the possible existence of cell structures which would recognize different molecules, thus allowing their activation. These structures, called receptors, showed a high level of specificity for each substance. However, only with the development of modern molecular biology techniques it would be possible to recognize their details.

The first opioid antagonists appeared in the 1940s: naloxone and afterward naltrexone. The first synthetic opioid, meperidine, was also developed during this period3,7.

The interest in this area increased even more with the liberal investment of the American government, especially during the Nixon era, who declared War against Heroin, encouraging the creation of opioid research centers7.

In the mid 1960s, Paul Janssen synthesized for the first time fentanyl in his lab, and in the 1970s, the first endogen polypeptides (encephalins and β-endorphins) were isolated and purified8.

A pioneer study by Candace Pert and Solomon Snyder, published in March 1973, has shown the existence of specific naloxone receptors in the brain of mammals and in the bowels of guinea-pigs7,9.

One year after this discovery, in May 1974, several researchers from different centers met in Boston, in the Neuroscience Research Program. Many subjects were discussed, such as details about the binding of opioid receptors and the first publications about endogen opioids7.

Pharmacological nalorphine studies in humans have shown an interesting result. In low doses it would antagonize morphine analgesic effects. However, the analgesic effect would return with higher doses. With this finding, it was apparent the existence of more than one receptor to explain this dualism10.

Opioids are very important for analgesia and the image of the opium poppy appears in traditional symbols of medical entities such as the Royal College of Aneasthetitsts.

By convention, opiates are all substances of natural origin present in the poppy opium, while opioids would be all natural or synthetic molecules acting on their specific receptors11.

Other poppies, especially Papaver bracteatum and Papaver orientale are rich in thebaine and are used to produce hydromorphone, hydrocodone and other synthetic opioids.

Through research with rodent ileum preparations it was possible to identify three opioid receptors which were named with Greek letters according to the corresponding first letter of each specific substance used to stimulate them12. So, morphine-activated receptor was called µ (mu); ketocyclazocine e responsive was called κ (kappa) and the one activated by substance SKF10047 was called σ (sigma). Described psychomimetic effects related to sigma receptors were later reanalyzed and the conclusion was that they were in fact caused by NMDA-type glutamatergic receptors blockade. Similarly, subsequent studies have failed to show the existence of the sigma-type receptor3,9.

Another endogen polypeptides group was identified during the 1980s and was called dynorphins. These peptides derive from major precursors which, in mammals, are: proencephalin A, prodynorphin and proopiomelanocortin3.

Later, Kosterlitz et al.13 using vas deferens rats, has determined a new receptor type and, following the same naming rule, has called it δ (delta), again totaling three opioid receptors3,9.

The δ receptor was the first to be cloned in laboratory. It has as major agonist agents encephalin (deltorphin) with low selectivity by high affinity, and also SIOM, derived from naltrexone, more selective and potent. Naltrindol, also derived from naltrexone, antagonizes such substance and is the first to be synthesized in laboratory13.

In κ receptors, the first identified agonist was ketocyclazocine and the antagonist is nor-binaltofirmin with potent action. Finally, µ receptors had as first identified antagonist morphine and as antagonist naloxone14.

According to receptors subtype and their location in the nervous system, some actions are well defined. δ receptors are primarily responsible for analgesia, but also for modulating cognitive and physical dependence functions. They are located in pontine angles, tonsils, olfactory bulb, deep cerebral cortex and peripheral sensory neurons15.

κ receptors have nociception, thermoregulation, diuresis control and neuroendocrine secretion functions. They are located in the hypothalamus, periaquedutal gray matter, spinal cord gelatinous matter, in addition to peripheral sensory neurons15.

As to µ receptors, they regulate functions such as nociception, respiratory cycle and intestinal transit, being located in cerebral cortex laminae III and V, in the thalamus, in the periaquedutal gray matter, in the gelatinous matter and in the gastrointestinal tract15.

In humans, genes codifying these receptors transcription are located as follows: in chromosome 1 for δ receptors, in the long arm of chromosome 8 for κ receptors and µ receptors are codified by chromosome 315.

These receptors are coupled to G protein in the cell membrane. When stimulated by an opioid, there is inhibition of the enzyme adenylate cyclase decreasing the intracellular level of cyclic adenosyl. This closes voltage-dependent calcium channels in pre-synaptic terminations decreasing neurotransmitters release and receptors activation, however not K+ channels in the postsynaptic membrane. This leads to a hyperpolarization of this neuron, partially blocking pain stimulation transmission16.

There is a proposal advocated by molecular biologists to change the name of δ, κ and µ receptors, which were defined by pharmacologists. According to this proposal, they would become DOR, KOR and MOR (delta, kappa and mu, respectively). However, such naming is still highly controversial. Finally, the International Union of Pharmacologists (IUPHAR) has defined new names according to the historical sequence of receptors cloning. Receptors would be called OP, followed by a subscript number referred to the chronological cloning order and, when necessary, by a letter related to subtypes. So, DOD receptors would become OP1, KOP would become OP2 and so on9,15.

Studies of activity with radioligands have determined the presence of two µ receptor subtypes. µ1 receptor has a binding site sensitive to naloxone and µ2 receptors are selective for morphine17.

Two δ antagonists were compared, naltrindol and encephalin. The δ1 subtype was considered the site where naltrindol has blocked deltanorphine effects and δ2 the site where one encephalin (DALCE) has selectively blocked the action of another encephalin (DPDPE)18. The presence of two κ receptor subtypes was shown using radiomarked ketocyclazocine. Subtype κ1 is the site sensitive to substance U50, 488H, while κ2 ended up being considered a κ1 receptor dimmer. Among κ1 receptors there is another subdivision categorized according to receptor's affinity with dynorphins. κ1a was considered with the lowest affinity and κ1b with the highest affinity. Subtype κ3 came from studies with a solution containing agonist and antagonist (naloxone benzoyl-hydrazone), determining the site where it would antagonize morphine19.

New receptor subtypes have been studied, determining that ε (epsilon) receptors are located in lymphocytes and have high affinity with β-endorphin20. Another subtype called ζ (zeta) is present in skin, cornea and brain cells, being selective for met-encephalin. They are related to the growth of some tumor cells21. Other receptor subtypes are described as ι (iota), the encephalin of which has high affinity being present in the ileum of rabbits, and λ (lambda), with affinity to epoxymorphine, being found in fresh preparations with cell membranes of rats22.

 

CONCLUSION

In the future, further molecular biology technique advances and complementary DNA isolation shall probably bring new knowledge and better understanding and identification of opioid receptors, including their actions.

 

REFERENCES

1. Wright AD. The history of opium. Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila 1961;29(1):22-7.         [ Links ]

2. Baraka A. Historical aspects of opium. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 1982;6(5):289-302.         [ Links ]

3. Brownstein MJ. A brief history of opiates, opioid peptides, and opioid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993;15;90(12):5391-3.         [ Links ]

4. Schiff PL Jr. Opium and Its Alkaloids. Am J Pharm Educ 2002;66(2):186-94.         [ Links ]

5. Smale R. Addiction and creativity: from laudanum to recreational drugs. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2001;8(5):459-63.         [ Links ]

6. Frick S, Kramell R, Schmidt J, et al. Comparative qualitative and quantitative determination of alkaloids in narcotic and condiment Papaver somniferum cultivars. J Nat Prod 2005;68(5):666-73.         [ Links ]

7. Snyder SH, Pasternak GW. Historical review: opioid receptors. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2003;24(4):198-205.         [ Links ]

8. Pasternak GW, Simantov R, Snyder SH. Characterization of an endogenous morphine-like factor (enkephalin) in mammalian brain. Mol Pharmacol 1976;12(3):504-13.         [ Links ]

9. Pert CB, Snyder SH. Opiate receptor: demonstration in nervous tissue. Science 1973;9;179(4077):1011-4.         [ Links ]

10. Lasagna L, Beecher HK. The analgesic effectiveness of nalorphine and nalorphine-morphine combinations in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1954;112(3):356-63.         [ Links ]

11. Posso IP, Oliveira JO Jr. Os opioides e a legislação. Rev Dor 2009;10(4):355-69.         [ Links ]

12. Martin WR, Eades CG, Thompson JA, et al. The effects of morphine- and nalorphine- like drugs in the nondependent and morphine-dependent chronic spinal dog. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1976;197(3):517-32.         [ Links ]

13. Kosterlitz HW, Lord JA, Paterson SJ, et al. Effects of changes in the structure of enkephalins and of narcotic analgesic drugs on their interactions with mu- and delta-receptors. Br J Pharmacol 1980;68(2):333-42.         [ Links ]

14. Emmerson PJ, Liu MR, Woods JH, et al. Binding affinity and selectivity of opioids at mu, delta and kappa receptors in monkey brain membranes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1994;271(3):1630-7.         [ Links ]

15. Dhawan BN, Cesselin F, Raghubir R, et al. International Union of Pharmacology. XII. Classification of opioid receptors. Pharmacol Rev 1996;48(4):567-92.         [ Links ]

16. Jordan BA, Devi LA. G-protein-coupled receptor heterodimerization modulates receptor function. Nature 1999;Jun 17;399(6737):697-700.         [ Links ]

17. Wolozin BL, Pasternak GW. Classification of multiple morphine and enkephalin binding sites in the central nervous system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78(10):6181-5.         [ Links ]

18. Jiang Q, Takemori AE, Porreca F, et al. Differential antagonism of opioid delta antinociception by [D-Ala2,Leu5,Cys6]enkephalin and naltrindole 5'-isothiocyanate: evidence for delta receptor subtypes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1991;257(3):1069-75.         [ Links ]

19. Zukin RS, Eghbali M, Olive D, et at. Characterization and visualization of rat and guinea pig brain kappa opioid receptors: evidence for kappa 1 and kappa 2 opioid receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85(11):4061-5.         [ Links ]

20. Hazum E, Chang KJ, Cuatrecasas P. Specific nonopiate receptors for beta-endorphin. Science 1979;205(4410):1033-5.         [ Links ]

21. Zagon IS, Wu Y, McLaughlin PJ. The opioid growth factor, [Met5]-enkephalin, and the zeta opioid receptor are present in human and mouse skin and tonically act to inhibit DNA synthesis in the epidermis. J Invest Dermatol 1996;106(3):490-7.         [ Links ]

22. Southwell BR. Localization of protein kinase C theta immunoreactivity to interstitial cells of Cajal in guinea-pig gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterol Motil 2003;15(2):139-47.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Rodrigo Tomazini Martins, M.D.
Instituto de Neurologia de Curitiba
Rua Jeremias Maciel Perreto, 300
81210-310 Curitiba, PR.
E-mail: rodrigom@inc-neuro.com.br

Submitted in December 27, 2011.
Accepted for publication in February 27, 2012.

 

 

* Received from the Pain Group, Neurology Institute of Curitiba. Curitiba, PR.