Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Pain amplification syndrome in the elderly: case report and literature review

Abstracts

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are very few publications on pain amplification syndrome in the elderly (PAS), in spite of its importance for them, because it may have multiple consequences during aging. This study aimed at reporting a case of PAS in the elderly represented by fibromyalgia (FM), describing its diagnostic approach and therapeutic management, and at presenting a literature review on the subject. CASE REPORT: Female patient, 73 years old, with moderate diffuse muscle pain, fleeting morning stiffness, anhedonia, sadness, anxiety, major fatigue and sleep disorders for four years. She was initially diagnosed as rheumatic polymyalgia and was under regular prednisone in spite of the progressive worsening of her functional capacity and quality of life (QL). One year ago her diagnosis was reviewed by our service and we confirmed it was PAS, spectrum of FM. Prednisone was then withdrawn and non-pharmacological therapy was indicated with pain self-management program; multi-176 modal pharmacological therapy was also instituted with non-opioid (lysine clonixinate) and opioid (tramadol) analgesics and a pain modulator (duloxetine). Six months later there has been major pain, sleep, depression, anxiety, functional capacity and QL improvement. CONCLUSION: Accurate diagnosis and adequate therapeutic intervention are paramount for PAS cases, especially in the elderly population with FM, which has unique characteristics in such population. There are major probabilities of symptomatic, functional and QL improvement in the elderly with PAS if we pay attention to differential diagnoses and introduce adequate therapies.

Differential diagnoses; Elderly; Fibromyalgia; Pain amplification syndrome


JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Pouquíssimas são as publicações sobre a síndrome de amplificação dolorosa no idoso (SAD), a despeito da sua importância para aqueles indivíduos, pois pode ter múltiplas consequências no envelhecimento. O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar um caso de SAD no idoso; representada pela fibromialgia (FM), descrevendo sua abordagem diagnóstica e seu manuseio terapêutico, bem como apresentar uma revisão bibliográfica do assunto. RELATO DO CASO: Paciente do gênero feminino, 73 anos, há 4 anos iniciando um quadro de moderada dor muscular difusa, rigidez matinal fugaz, anedonia, tristeza, ansiedade, importante fadiga e distúrbio do sono. Inicialmente, diagnosticada polimialgia reumática, assim, vinha fazendo uso regular de prednisona, apesar de progressiva piora da sua capacidade funcional e qualidade de vida (QV). Há um ano, no nosso serviço, foi revisto o diagnóstico, e verificado tratar-se de SAD, espectro da FM. Suspendeu-se, então, a prednisona e orientado terapia não farmacológica com programa de autogerenciamento em dor, e farmacológica multimodal com analgésicos não opioide o clonixinato de lisina e opioide o tramadol, e um modulador da dor, a duloxetina. Após 6 meses de tratamento verificou-se grande melhora na dor, sono, depressão, ansiedade, capacidade funcional e QV. CONCLUSÃO: É de suma importância o diagnóstico correto e uma intervenção terapêutica adequada nos casos de SAD, especialmente tratando-se da população idosa e da FM, a qual apresenta características peculiares naquela população. Há grandes probabilidades de melhora sintomática, funcional, e na QV dos idosos com SAD ao se atentar aos diagnósticos diferenciais, bem como ao se introduzir terapêuticas adequadas.

Diagnósticos diferenciais; Fibromialgia; Idoso; Síndrome de amplificação dolorosa


CASE REPORT

Pain amplification syndrome in the elderly. Case report and literature review

IDoctor Assistant and Head of the Pain and Musculoskeletal Diseases Service, Discipline of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP); Coordinator of the Pain in the Elderly Committee, Brazilian Society for the Study of Pain (SBED). São Paulo, SP, Brazil

IIAssistant physicians, Pain and Musculoskeletal Diseases Service, Discipline of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP). São Paulo, SP, Brazil

Correspondence to

SUMMARY

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are very few publications on pain amplification syndrome in the elderly (PAS), in spite of its importance for them, because it may have multiple consequences during aging. This study aimed at reporting a case of PAS in the elderly represented by fibromyalgia (FM), describing its diagnostic approach and therapeutic management, and at presenting a literature review on the subject.

CASE REPORT: Female patient, 73 years old, with moderate diffuse muscle pain, fleeting morning stiffness, anhedonia, sadness, anxiety, major fatigue and sleep disorders for four years. She was initially diagnosed as rheumatic polymyalgia and was under regular prednisone in spite of the progressive worsening of her functional capacity and quality of life (QL). One year ago her diagnosis was reviewed by our service and we confirmed it was PAS, spectrum of FM. Prednisone was then withdrawn and non-pharmacological therapy was indicated with pain self-management program; multimodal pharmacological therapy was also instituted with non-opioid (lysine clonixinate) and opioid (tramadol) analgesics and a pain modulator (duloxetine). Six months later there has been major pain, sleep, depression, anxiety, functional capacity and QL improvement.

CONCLUSION: Accurate diagnosis and adequate therapeutic intervention are paramount for PAS cases, especially in the elderly population with FM, which has unique characteristics in such population. There are major probabilities of symptomatic, functional and QL improvement in the elderly with PAS if we pay attention to differential diagnoses and introduce adequate therapies.

Keywords: Differential diagnoses, Elderly, Fibromyalgia, Pain amplification syndrome.

INTRODUCTION

Population aging is a worldwide phenomenon with unprecedented levels. Only in Brazil, the elderly population shall double in the next two decades and may reach 30 million of individuals1. This fact is followed by increased frequency of cases related to pain complaints.

Pain, for its prevalence and impact, is considered today a major public health problem. Older people are especially more susceptible to chronic pain, which ends up contributing to functional impairments and also worse quality of life scores (QL)2.

Pain amplification syndrome (PAS) has significantly increased in recent years, also including the aging population. However, there are still few studies specifically addressing it in the elderly.

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a major PAS presentation, which is seldom addressed and discussed in aging people, especially in Brazil.

This study aimed at reporting a PAS case as well as at reviewing FM spectrum in the literature, describing diagnostic approaches and adopted therapies, in addition to presenting a scientific-literary review on the subject.

CASE REPORT

Female patient, 73 years old, artisan, with hypertension, spinal osteoporosis and osteoarthritis, who referred paresthesia and sensation of edema on hands, moderate diffuse muscle pain, fleeting morning stiffness, anhedonia, sadness, anxiety, major fatigue and sleep disorders for four years. She was being followed by other health service since the beginning of symptoms with diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatica.

So, since that time she was under regular steroids with 10 mg prednisone/day. She referred initial pain improvement but her functional capacity was progressively worsening.

She is being followed by our service for one year and was initially submitted to evaluation especially addressing the different aspects of her pain: moderate intensity by the verbal scale, and equal to 5 by the numerical verbal scale, continuous, diffuse and heavy chronic pain but with exacerbation periods, interference with her executive functionality with partial dependence for complex daily life activities, interference with her affection with depression and anxiety followed by fatigue and sleep disorders.

Physical evaluation has shown just hyperalgesia in upper and lower limbs. We suspected of PAS, FM spectrum, and requested several laboratory tests, including inflammatory tests, vitamin D, CPK, thyroid, parathyroid, kidney and liver function, among others, and all were within reference values, except for VHS of 40 mm in the first hour. Compared to tests of three years ago, VHS was 43 mm in the first hour. We have also requested shoulders ultrasound, which has not shown significant changes. Bone densitometry was not performed because she missed her appointments several times.

With the higher possibility of really being FM, we have gradually withdrawn prednisone and established a new treatment: pain self-management program with guidance and exercises, educational measures, physical measures at home, such as the use of stupes, coping, cognitive-behavioral measures and multimodal pharmacological therapy with non-steroid analgesic (125 mg lysine clonixinate every 8 hours) and opioid analgesic (50 mg tramadol every 8 hours) intercalated by 14 days of duloxetine (60 mg/day).

Six month later she returned referring that she was accurately complying with our guidance and that there had been major improvement in her general status with significant pain, sleep, depression and anxiety improvement with major improvement of her functional capacity and QL.

DISCUSSION

In this case, it was observed that only after three years of medical follow-up and prolonged treatment with steroids the correct diagnosis was established. Since the beginning, a major disproportion between symptoms and findings was observed. Pain was not severe but interfered a lot with her affection, functionality and sleep, and was associated to major fatigue.

In the "pain puzzle", PAS is considered a new piece that, in turn, belongs to a group of conditions especially characterized by pain without associated organic cause, or even by symptoms disproportional to findings. So, there is chronic pain the intensity of which is not objectively explained3. Such condition has also been called functional pain syndrome.

Traditionally, most patients affected visit many physicians, including different specialties according to predominant symptoms and in general, abnormalities which could fully explain the symptoms are not identified.

PAS has a wide presentation spectrum being most frequent the musculoskeletal forms. But in addition to PAS musculoskeletal forms, other chronic conditions have been observed in recent years, such as chronic fatigue syndrome, headaches, irritable colon and bladder syndromes, restless legs syndrome, and periodic limbs movement syndrome, among others. They have similar conditions with common features based on their biopathophysiological knowledge4,5.

PAS musculoskeletal spectra, for being very frequent, will be deeper discussed. They are classified into localized and generalized forms.

Localized musculoskeletal PAS are especially recognized by the following syndromic diagnoses: complex regional pain syndrome type 1, which is less common in the elderly; miofascial pain syndrome, more frequent above 60 years of age; and temporomandibular dysfunction syndrome5. These forms affect just some body regions, being characterized by hyperalgesia and allodynia, but also by trophic changes in affected tissues. It is less frequent in hands and feet, very often preventing the use of shoes or socks, which ends up limiting daily activities6.

These localized forms tend to generalization when they are not adequately treated, so accurate diagnoses and approaches are relevant. Miofascial pain syndrome is highly prevalent in the elderly and is associated to excessive muscle use thus being also called muscle stress syndrome. It is characterized by muscle pain, strained muscle bands and trigger-points (TP) located in muscles, skin, tendons, periosteum and ligaments very sensitive to stimulations, generating local and/or referred pain7. TP may be evident with biological aging, causing motor incoordination by excitability disorders and motoneurons nervous conduction, preventing the synchronization of nervous contractions of synergist muscles.

Generalized musculoskeletal PAS are characterized by the presence of muscle and joint pain symptoms, the latter less frequent, which are diffuse in different body regions. These symptoms are followed by neurovegetative disorders. Some changes in normally presented characters are typical of generalized PAS and very often external influences may be recognized as causing them8. Most people affected report more severe pain during weather changes or when the weather is cold and wet. They feel better in warm and dry weather and physical stress worsens a lot the disorders8. Major nosological entity of this group is FM.

Among risk factors for the onset and maintenance of generalized PAS there are age, female gender, family history of chronic pain, obesity and more deficient mental and/or physical status9. Factors negatively influencing generalized form results are: high levels of psychological disorders, somatization, fatigue, poor sleep, higher number of painful areas, pain intensity, mental status and impaired functional capacity, comorbidities and higher number of medical visits to primary care institutions9. Mild alcohol consumption and individualized social support seem to have protective effects9.

As to genesis, PAS has been described as multifactorial. It is believed that involved factors are especially genetic, environmental such as traumas, infections, emotional stress, adverse childhood experiences and patterns learned to face pain. It seems clear that this is not a primary psychiatric condition and that there is no need for psychological factors for its genesis, because most patients do not have active psychiatric diseases or even a specific type of personality, such as obsessive-compulsive disorders. However, depression is very frequent. It is impossible to determine whether psychological factors are primary, simultaneous or secondary8.

As to involved pathophysiological mechanisms, there are major associations with somatosensory system dysfunction, with abnormal pain processing by central nervous system, with neuroendocrine system dysfunction evidencing changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and with failure of the stress response system, with adaptation deficit to physical or psychical overload8.

Experimental studies have shown the presence of high nitric oxide levels in the muscles, in addition to low phosphorylation and muscle oxidative capacity potential, such as decreased muscle phosphocreatine, ATP and increased substance P. Such changes could help pain sensitization and amplification shown by primary afferent nociceptors changes, with increased neuronal and receptive neuronal fields excitability, that is, there would be an increase in the referred pain area, or afferent hypersensitivity.

There is central sensitization with increased substance P and dynorphin in the CSF, increased temporal summation and somatosensory potential by skin stimulations, decreased nociceptive inhibitory control system activity, with serotoninergic dysfunction evidenced by decreased serotonin and its precursors levels10. Among neuroendocrine changes and abnormal responses to stress there are abnormal ACTH and urinary cortisol levels with decreased cortisol response and sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity11.

In general, PAS diagnosis is based on clinical findings because laboratory and imaging results are normal. Its identification depends on a good communication between patients and physicians, which will allow the observation of sensory, emotional and cognitive involvement of patients. Sometimes the elderly have communication limitations, such as visual and auditory deficits12.

Specifically for elderly people, one should always check chronic pain impact on functional capacity, that is, impact on physical, mental, social and executive-functional dimensions, in addition to QL. PAS represents a major impact on their lives13. From the physical and mental point of view, chronic pain often contributes to gait disorders with ambulation impairment, thus leading to loss of fitness and also to falls.

In terms of executive functionality, chronic pain often brings a higher degree of functional dependence for instrumental and basic daily life activities. In the social dimension, there is increased use of medical services and higher family expenses, which frequently helps impairing QL, isolating individuals from important social stimulations and amplifying functional and emotional losses caused by untreated pain. In general, patients experience major physical distress, fatigue, depression and sleep disorders, in addition to other potentially debilitating overlapping conditions14.

It is important to understand PAS effects on functional independence and QL of the elderly for effective treatment strategies. Moderate chronic pain has negative influences, so health professionals should be always alert and use evaluation methods which may identify the magnitude of the pain, since very often the elderly are unable to adequately express their pains, thus offering all necessary health support15.

Central desensitization is critical for an adequate therapy. Antidepressants, anticonvulsants, NMDA receptor antagonists, psychotherapy and sleep improvement may be very successful. So, pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches are always required and currently they may be powerful interventions to manage PAS.

Among PAS in the elderly population, FM deserves attention since there are few scientific studies addressing this subject specifically in Geriatrics. It is believed that FM in the elderly population is often inaccurately diagnosed and as a consequence is inadequately treated and this is why further investigations and disclosures on the subject are justified. A very important fact is that the elderly experience different levels of "fibromyalgia symptoms" as compared to younger people16.

There are many studies on FM prevalence but most of them address the population where this disease is more frequent – between 30 and 60 years of age17. Considering the Brazilian population one more fact should be taken into consideration: those prevalence studies were carried out in countries with different characteristics from our study.

Most frequent FM cases in the population are found in the program The Community Oriented Program for Control of Rheumatic Disease (COPCORD) created by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International League of Associations of Rheumatology (ILAR). However, the studies involved in this program address major age intervals and several rheumatic diseases, thus impairing FM prevalence results, especially in the elderly. In addition, among them, just one Brazilian study has specifically addressed the elderly population. This latter has found FM prevalence of 1.9% in older individuals between 55 and 74 years of age18.

An American study with more specificity for FM has found prevalence of 5.4% for people above 60 years of age19. A French study has found prevalence of 2.8% and 4.1% for ages between 65 and 74 years and 75 to 84 years, respectively20.

Little has been discussed in published studies about FM characteristics in the elderly, so it is unknown whether ethnic, cultural and / or environmental variables would differ in addressed elderly populations. In general, there is always predominance of the female gender, which in turn would consider gender as pain predisposing factor, based on biological, hormonal and social factors.

There are currently two diagnostic criteria for FM. According to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), whose criteria are internationally recognized, it has to be diffuse pain for three months or more and have 11 out of 18 tender points (anatomical areas with excessive pain sensitivity at palpation, being typically areas of muscles and tendons insertion)21. More recently, Wolfe et al criteria22 require the presence of 4 or 5 tender points and several overlapping symptoms such as cognitive changes, fatigue, sleep disorders and depression. What has encouraged discussions about these recently developed criteria was the determination of the tender points, which are very subjective and vary according to the examiner and the occasion.

Some patients may identify factors triggering or worsening their pain, among them virus infection, physical and psychical traumas, weather changes, inactivity and anxiety. In general, in addition to persistent pain, most have fatigue14 in addition to other complaints, among them: sleep disorders, tension headache or migraine, irritable colon, Raynaud phenomenon, subjective edema of soft tissues, concentration difficulty, dry mouth and eyes, palpitation, paresthesia in upper and / or lower limbs, sensitivity to some foods and medications, depression and / or history of depression23. Some diseases are very similar to FM.

A study comparing 31 individuals with FM onset after 60 years of age and other 63 individuals where its onset was before 60 years of age, has found that in 40% of them rheumatoid arthritis or polymyalgia rheumatica had been incorrectly diagnosed17. These individuals were submitted to oral steroids, which is a problem especially for the elderly population. An important observation in this same study was the recognition that FM was present in just 17% of the elderly with that condition.

With aging, FM symptoms become unique. Younger people refer pain as the worst symptom while the elderly refer more fatigue, swelling and depression16, being less frequent headaches, self-report of anxiety and depression, symptoms worsening by weather conditions, mental effort or sleep disorders16. The elderly may even be less symptomatic than middle-age adults, as shown by a recent study24, however the importance of their clinical status is still noted.

Peripheral nociceptive reductions are still very useful to treat FM in the elderly, particularly for muscles, improvements or preventions of central sensitization and the management of associated negative effects, especially depression. In studies involving pharmacological therapy efficacy in the elderly, in addition to efficacy, tolerability and comorbidities were also very important. Treatments for elderly individuals should be adapted to meet their unique needs, taking into account their individual health.

The pharmacological treatment includes some classes of drugs. Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) seem to have a synergic effect when combined to drugs acting on the central nervous system, however one has to be more cautious with the elderly.

Antidepressants, among them tricyclic25, amitriptyline and nortipritlyne, are the drugs of choice and may improve, pain, sleep, depression, stress and anxiety. However they should also be carefully used by the elderly due to their adverse effects. Double-action inhibitors are more on focus, with evidences for duloxetine. In a multicenter study also involving the elderly with FM, but with mean age of 49 years, duloxetine during 12 weeks has considerably improved females' pain intensity, stiffness and QL26.

Antiepileptic drugs, such as gabapentin27, pregabalin28, topiramate, carbamazepine and lamogrigine may also be used. A recent study using duloxetine and pregabalin for 12 months, also involving the elderly but with mean age of 50 years, has shown different dose patterns for each drug29. In this study, mean daily duloxetine dose was relatively more stable along time, while there has been significant pregabalin dose increase during the period, with mean daily dose of 55.6 mg/person for duloxetine and 195.7 mg/person for pregabalin, thus implying higher costs for pregabalin.

Neuromuscular blockers, such as cyclobenzaprine30, carisoprodol and tizanidine are also part of the therapeutic armamentarium, as well as dopaminergic agonists.

As to non-pharmacological therapy, of major importance, the key-aspect would be patients' education by explaining the disease. Exercises, in their different modalities, are also mandatory. Strength training, especially for elderly patients, is becoming an area of major interest due to several functional health benefits31. Physical exercises should be carefully oriented otherwise the may pose risks to the elderly because factors such as age, fitness level, exercise intensity and overlapping conditions determine favorable or unfavorable results12. Cognitive-behavioral therapy, yoga and all types of massages may bring symptoms relief32. Acupuncture has obtained results for FM, however for a short period.

In summary, to date, FM treatment is symptomatic and should be multidisciplinary with the association of pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapies, highlighting multimodal therapies.

Polymyalgia rheumatica in the elderly may really have several differentials (Table 1)33, so one should be cautious because a wrong treatment with steroids, which are the drugs of choice for polymyalgia rheumatica, may bring severe problems, especially for the elderly. Mild HSV increases are common in the geriatric population and very often have no clinical significance. Currently, shoulders ultrasound is being useful to help differential polymyalgia rheumatica diagnosis and usually shows bilateral subacromial/subdeltoid bursitis34,35. This latter has high sensitivity and specificity for polymyalgia rheumatica and has been suggested as a new diagnostic criterion since it is altered both in cases of high or normal HSV35.

After a correct diagnosis and guided and carefully followed clinical treatment, there has been significant PAS improvement.

Supported by literature review, multimodal pain therapy is very effective and is based on the premise that, whenever possible, drugs and techniques with synergic pharmacokinetic and / or pharmacodynamic effects should be associated to relieve pain. This would allow a more rational use with lower drug doses and less side effects. The pain self-management program36 adopted in this clinical case was very important for the analgesic treatment and aimed at decreasing pain, improving mood and psychosocial functioning of the patient. There has been also contribution of the pharmacological therapy with prescription of opioid analgesics such as tramadol, of non-opioid analgesics such as lysine clonixinate, this latter with proved analgesic efficacy and tolerability for the elderly37, and prescription of duloxetine, a pain-modulating drug.

PAS management in the elderly is still a major challenge. In our case, patient was submitted to a long treatment with steroids, which represented at least a major problem for her with significant increase of the risk of fractures.

It is very important to identify PAS in the elderly knowing that in younger people pain is the worst symptom while in the elderly most common symptoms are fatigue, swelling and depression11. They have also less complaints of chronic headache, self-report of anxiety and stress, symptoms worsening by weather factors, mental effort or sleep disorders. Due to the major distress and functional impairment that PAS may bring, health professionals should pay attention to the list of possible diagnoses for the elderly with diffuse pain. Currently, even other aspects have been studied with regard to diffuse pain, such as the speed of psychomotor processing which is very important during aging. A study has found association between generalized chronic pain and slower cognitive processing speed in community elderly people38.

So, PAS should not be overlooked in the elderly. All attention should be driven to diagnosis and treatment, looking for releasing symptoms which may impair a successful aging. There are major probabilities of symptomatic, functional and QL improvement of the elderly with PAS if we pay attention to their differential diagnoses and introduce adequate therapies.

CONCLUSION

PAS in the elderly is still poorly diagnosed in spite of the major clinical importance of its repercussion, especially in the case of FM spectrum, which has unique features in patients. Significant clinical improvement of our clinical case implied considering several differential diagnoses and guidance for multimodal therapy.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Chaimowicz F. A saúde dos idosos brasileiros às vésperas do século XXI: problemas, projeções e alternativas. Rev Saúde Pública 1997;31(2):184-200.
  • 2. Crook J, Rideout E, Browne G. The prevalence of pain complaints in a general population. Pain 1984;18(3):299-314.
  • 3. Yunus MB. Central sensitivity syndromes: a unified concept for fibromyalgia and other similar maladies. J Indian Rheum Assoc 2000;8(1):27-33.
  • 4. Yunus MB. Fibromyalgia and overlapping disorders: the unifying concept of central sensitivity syndromes. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2007;36(6):339-56.
  • 5. Yunus MB. Central sensitivity syndromes: a new paradigm and group nosology for fibromyalgia and overlapping conditions, and the related issue of disease versus illness. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2008;37(6):339-52.
  • 6. Perl E, Graham-Kenan S. Causalgia: sympathetically-aggravated chronic pain from damaged nerves. Pain Clinical Updates 1993;(4):1.
  • 7. Gerwin RD, Dommerholt J, Shah JP. An expansion of Simons' integrated hypothesis of trigger point formation. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2004;8(6):468-75.
  • 8. Yunus MB. Psychological aspects of fibromyalgia syndrome: a component of the dysfunctional spectrum syndrome. Baillieres Clin Rheumatol 1994;8(4):811-37.
  • 9. Mourão AF, Blyth FM, Branco JC. Generalised musculoskeletal pain syndromes. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24(6):829-40.
  • 10. Chase TN, Murphy DL. Serotonin and central nervous system function. Annu Rev Pharmacol 1973;13:181-97.
  • 11. Schwarz MJ, Späth M, Müller-Bardorff H, et al. Relationship of substance P, 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid and tryptophan inserum of fibromyalgia patients. Neuro Sci Lett 1999;259(3):196-8.
  • 12. Costa EDGMM. Síndromes de Amplificação Dolorosa. Einstein 2008;6(Suppl 1):S151-6.
  • 13. Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38(1):19-28.
  • 14. Bennett JA, Stewart AL, Kayser-Jones J, et al. The mediating effect of pain and fatigue on level of functioning in older adults. Nurs Res 2002;51(4):254-65.
  • 15. Cunha LL, Mayrink WC. Influência da dor crônica na qualidade de vida em idosos. Rev Dor 2011;12(2):120-4.
  • 16. Yunus MB, Holt GS, Masi AT, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome among the elderly. Comparison with younger patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1988;36(11):987-95.
  • 17. Neumann L, Buskilla D. Epidemiology of fibromyalgia. Curr Pain Head Rep 2003;7:362-68.
  • 18. Senna ER, De Barros AL, Silva EO, et al. Prevalence of rheumatic diseases in Brazil: a study using the COPCORD approach. J Rheumatol 2004;31(3):594-7.
  • 19. Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995;38(1):19-28.
  • 20. Bannwarth B, Blotman F, Roué-Le Lay K, et al. Fibromyalgia syndrome in the general population of France: a prevalence study. Joint Bone Spine 2009;76(2):184-7.
  • 21. Wolfe F, Smythe HA, Yunus MB, et al. The American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria for the Classification of Fibromyalgia. Report of the Multicenter Criteria Committee. Arthritis Rheum 1990;33(2):160-72.
  • 22. Wolfe F, Clauw AJ, Fitzcharles AM, et al. The American College of Rheumatology Preliminary Diagnostic Criteria for Fibromyalgia and Measurement of Symptom Severity. Arthritis Care Res 2010;62(5):600-10.
  • 23. Goldenberg DL. Fibromyalgia syndrome. An emerging but controversial condition. JAMA 1987;257(20):2782-7.
  • 24. Shillam CR, Dupree Jones K, Miller L. Fibromyalgia symptoms, physical function, and comorbidity in middle-aged and older adults. Nurs Res 2011;60(5):309-17.
  • 25. Goldenberg DL, Felson DT, Dinerman H. A randomized, controlled trial of amitriptyline and naproxen in the treatment of patients with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1986;29(11):1371-7.
  • 26. Arnold LM, Lu Y, Crofford LJ, et al. A double-blind, multicenter trial comparing duloxetine with placebo in the treatment of fibromyalgia patients with or without major depressive disorder. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50(9):2974-84.
  • 27. Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, Derry S, et al. Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;16;(3):CD007938.
  • 28. Crofford LJ, Rowbotham MC, Mease PJ, et al. Pregabalin for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52(4):1264-73.
  • 29. Sun P, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, et al. Medication dosing patterns associated with duloxetine and pregabalin among patients with fibromyalgia. Curr Med Res Opin 2011;27(9):1793-801.
  • 30. Bennett RM, Gatter RA, Campbell SM, et al. A comparison of cyclobenzaprine and placebo in the management of fibrositis. A double-blind controlled study. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31(12):1535-42.
  • 31. Valkeinen H, Häkkinen K, Pakarinen A, et al. Muscle hypertrophy, strength development, and serum hormones during strength training in elderly women with fibromyalgia. Scand J Rheumatol 2005;34(4):309-14.
  • 32. Oliveira RDR, Petean FC, Louzada-Júnior P. Fibromialgia. Rev Bras Med 2010;67(12):31-6.
  • 33. Scotton AS. Souza VA, Fraga RO, et al. Fibromialgia. Rev Bras Med 2010; 67(7):221-7.
  • 34. Cantini F, Salvarani C, Olivieri I, et al. Shoulder ultrasonography in the diagnosis of polymyalgia rheumatic: a case-control study. J Rheumatol 2001;28(5):1049-55.
  • 35. Cantini F, Salvarani C, Olivieri I, et al. Inflamed shoulder structures in polymyalgia rheumatica with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44(5):1155-9.
  • 36. Santos FC, Souza PMR, Nogueira SAC, et al. Programa de autogerenciamento da dor crônica no idoso: estudo piloto. Rev Dor 2011;12(3):209-14.
  • 37. Santos FC, Souza PMR, Toniolo Neto J, et al. Tratamento da dor associada à osteoartrite de joelho em idosos: um estudo randomizado duplamente encoberto com clonixinato lisina. Rev Dor 2011;12(1):6-14.
  • 38. Lee DM, Pendleton N, Tajar A, et al. Chronic widespread pain is associated with slower cognitive processing speed in middle-aged and older European men. Pain 2010;151(1):30-6.
  • *
    Fânia Cristina SantosI; Polianna Mara Rodrigues de SouzaII; Luiz Antonio Homem de Mello CastroII; Karol Bezerra ThéII
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      28 June 2012
    • Date of issue
      June 2012

    History

    • Received
      28 Nov 2011
    • Accepted
      23 Apr 2012
    Sociedade Brasileira para o Estudo da Dor Av. Conselheiro Rodrigues Alves, 937 cj 2, 04014-012 São Paulo SP Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 5904 3959, Fax: (55 11) 5904 2881 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
    E-mail: dor@dor.org.br