Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Communicating vessels: a non-linear dynamical system

Vasos comunicantes: um sistema dinâmico não linear

Abstracts

The dynamics of an ideal fluid contained in two communicating vessels is studied. Despite the fact that the static properties of this system have been known since antiquity, the knowledge of the dynamical properties of an ideal fluid flowing in two communicating vessels is not similarly widespread. By means of Bernoulli's equation for non-stationary fluid flow, we study the oscillatory motion of the fluid when dissipation can be neglected.

Keywords:
Bernoulli's equation; non-stationary fluid; fluid dynamics


Estuda-se a dinâmica de um fluido ideal contido dentro de dois vasos comunicantes. Embora as propriedades estáticas desse sistema sejam conhecidas desde a Antiguidade, são bem menos conhecidas as propriedades dinâmicas do fluxo de dois fluidos ideais contidos vasos comunicantes. Utilizando a equação de Bernoulli para um fluxo não estacionário, nós estudamos o movimento oscilatório do fluido na ausência de dissipação.

Palavras-chave:
equação de Bernoulli; fluxo não estacionário; mecânica dos fluidos


1. Introduction

The topic of communicating vessels is often adopted as a common example in physics teaching [1[1] D. Halliday, R. Resnick and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley and Sons, New York, 2005), 7th ed.]. The static property of this system is also used in other subject areas as, for example, sociology and economics [2[2] F. van Waarden, in: Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective, edited by J.R. Hollingsworth, K.H. Müller and E.J. Hollingsworth (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, 2005), chapter 9.] and in metaphoric expressions. In fact, it is a widespread common knowledge that a fluid in adjacent containers reaches the same height, measured with respect to a common reference point, independently of the shape of the vessels. However, reference to the dynamical properties of these types of physical systems in physics teaching books is rarely found. One of this rare examples can be found in ref. [3[3] P.A. Tipler, Physics (Worth Publishers Inc., New York, 1980), chapter 14.], where it is reported that the height of an ideal fluid contained in a U-shaped tube is seen to oscillate harmonically with a frequency ω given by:

(1) ω = 2 g L ,

L being the total length of the fluid in the tube. Therefore, although the dynamics of these systems have been studied in quantum mechanical and classical contexts [4[4] R.J. Donnelly and O. Penrose, Phys. Rev. 103, 1137 (1956).6[6] S.L.T. de Souza, I.L. Caldas, R.L. Viana, J.M. Balthazar and R.M.L.R.F. Brasil, Journal of Sound and Vibration 289, 987 (2006).], it is still not much studied at elementary levels. In particular, we would like to mention a specific technological application of this system in structural engineering [6[6] S.L.T. de Souza, I.L. Caldas, R.L. Viana, J.M. Balthazar and R.M.L.R.F. Brasil, Journal of Sound and Vibration 289, 987 (2006).]. In this specific field, U-tube-like containers, called tuned-liquid column dampers, are used to mitigate earth-quake induced vibrations in tall buildings.

In the present work we thus consider the dynamics of two communicating vessels of unequal cross-sectional areas, say S1 and S2, as those shown in Fig.1. Therefore, the mechanical properties of the system shown in Fig. 1 are analyzed by means of Bernoulli's equation for non-stationary states. We write the nonlinear differential equations governing the motion of the system and point out that the result in equation (1) can be obtained by taking two equal sections; i.e., by writing S1=S2. In this case a harmonic solution is obtained. We also notice, by a phase plane numerical analysis, that the solutions for the heights y1 and y2 is still periodic in the most general case S1S2. In this general dynamical system the fixed point is identified with the static equilibrium solution; i.e., the common height ye of the two fluids. Further generalizations are proposed as, for example, the possibility of allowing leakage from the system.

Figura 1
Communicating vessels containing an ideal fluid out of equilibrium. The first vessel has cross-sectional area S1 and the fluid column reaches an height y1. The second vessel has cross-sectional area S2 and the fluid in it is at an height y2. The connection channel is positioned at the base of the two vessels and is supposed to be sufficiently small.

2. Preliminary dynamical notions

We start by writing the continuity equation for the fluid [5[5] M.J. Smith, J.J. Kobine and F.A. Davidson, Proc. R. Soc. A 464, 905 (2008).]:

(2a) S 1 y ˙ 1 + σ 12 = 0 ,
(2b) S 2 y ˙ 2 σ 12 = 0 ,

where σ12 is the flux flow rate in the connecting channel, as shown in Fig. 1. Summing the above equations, we have:

(3) S 1 y ˙ 1 + S 2 y ˙ 2 = 0 .

In equation (3) the static solution is implicitly defined. In fact, by integrating with respect to time, we get:

(4) S 1 y 1 ( 0 ) + S 2 y 2 ( 0 ) = λ S 1 + S 2 ,

where λ is the equilibrium height.

In order to tackle the dynamical problem, we need to specify the type of fluid we are dealing with. In what follows we shall thus assume that the fluid is ideal and that Bernoulli's equation, written for the non-stationary regime of the fluid, holds. A derivation of this equation can be found in ref. [7[7] R. De Luca and P. Desideri, Eur. J. Phys. 34, 189 (2013).]. Naturally, different behaviour is expected when the fluid is not ideal. We therefore write, for two points in the fluids, one at an height y1, corresponding to the free liquid surface in the left container, the second at y0, corresponding to point O in Fig. 1:

(5) y 0 y 1 v t d y + 1 2 v 1 2 + p 1 ρ + g y 1 = 1 2 v 0 2 + p 0 ρ + g y 0 ,

Setting p1=pa and v1v0 in equation (5), we have:

(6) p a - p 0 ρ = - y 1 y ¨ 1 - g y 1 ,

where we have assumed that the velocity profile does not appreciably vary with the height y and where the dot stands for “derivative with respect to time”. Similarly, for the second vessel, by considering one point corresponding to the free liquid surface and the other at y0, we may set:

(7) p a - p 0 ρ = - y 2 y ¨ 2 - g y 2 .

In this second case, we have considered p2=pa and v2v0. By now combining equations (6) and (7), we obtain:

(8) p 0 - p 0 ρ = y 1 y ¨ 1 - y 2 y ¨ 2 + g y 1 - y 2 .

Because of equation (3), we have y¨2=-S1/S2y¨1=-γy¨1, with the obvious definition of the parameter γ. On the same token, by equation (4), we may also set

(9) γ y 1 + y 2 = k = λ 1 + γ y 2 = - γ y 1 + λ 1 + γ .

Therefore, equation (8) can be written only in terms of the variable y1 as follows:

(10) p 0 p 0 ρ = ( 1 + γ ) [ ( 1 γ ) y 1 + λ γ ] y ¨ 1 + g ( 1 + γ ) [ y 1 λ ] .

If we now go in horizontal from point O to point O, assuming the connection channel to be sufficiently small, equation (5) gives:

(11) 1 2 v 0 2 + p 0 ρ = 1 2 v 0 2 + p 0 ρ ,

so that, because v1v0 and v2v0, we may rewrite equation (11) as follows:

(12) p 0 p 0 ρ = 1 2 ( y ˙ 2 2 y ˙ 1 2 ) = 1 2 ( γ 2 1 ) y ˙ 1 2 .

Finally, by combining equation (10) and equation (12), we have:

(13) 1 - γ y 1 + λ γ y ¨ 1 + 1 - γ 2 y ˙ 1 2 + g y 1 - λ = 0 .

By now making the change variable y=y1-λ, we may rewrite equation (13) as follows:

(14) 1 - γ y + λ g y ¨ + 1 - γ 2 g y ˙ 2 + y = 0 .

For γ=1 we find the already known result [3[3] P.A. Tipler, Physics (Worth Publishers Inc., New York, 1980), chapter 14.]:

(15) y ¨ + g λ y = 0 .

In this way, for γ=1, the liquid is seen to oscillate with a period T=2πλg. A trivial solution y2=λ can be found for γ=0. For 0<γ<1, on the other hand, we can proceed in normalizing the variable y and t as follows:

(16a) ξ = y λ ,
(16b) τ = g λ t .

In this way, we obtain the following non-linear second-order ordinary differential equation:

(17) ε ξ + 1 ξ + 1 2 ε ξ 2 + ξ = 0 ,

where ε=1-γ=1-S1/S2, and the prime stands for “derivative with respect to τ”. The above equation can be cast in the form of two first-order differential equations as follows:

(18a) ξ = v ,
(18b) v = - ξ + ε v 2 / 2 ε ξ + 1 .

Equations (18a) and (18b), under the condition 0ε<1, are sufficient to describe the dynamics of the system. Notice that, for ε=0, the harmonic oscillator equation is obtained from (18a) and (18b).

3. Analysis of the dynamical system

By considering equation (18a) and (18b) we can start by describing the dynamical propertied of the system by means of a phase-plane analysis. In fact, by noticing that equation (15) gives a periodic solution of the problem, we expect that, at least for small values of the quantity ε=1-γ, the solution ξ=ξτ of equation (17) to be periodic with an attraction point corresponding to ξ,v=0,0. In order to detect this property, let us consider the phase-plane representation of the coupled first-order ordinary differential equations (18a) and (18b). By considering the initial conditions

(19) ξ ( 0 ) = y 1 ( 0 ) - λ λ = ξ 0 , v ( 0 ) = 0 ,

we preliminary notice that the value of ξ0 must fall within the interval [-1,1]. In fact, the dimensionless quantity ξ represents the normalized deviation from the equilibrium position of the height of the liquid in the first column. In this way, we take the fluid to be initially at rest and completely contained in the right vessel or in the left vessel for ξ0=-1.0 and ξ0=+1.0, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2a and 2b, obtained by means of the software Mathematica, the system shows periodical solutions, since the curves are closed. In Fig. 2a we report solutions for ξ0=+1.0 and for different values of γ, corresponding to different colours. In Fig. 2b, on the other hand, solutions for ξ0=0.75 are shown for the same values of γ as in Fig. 2a. The black dashed line represents, in both Figs 2a and 2b, the harmonic solution to equation (15). We notice that, for decreasing values of ξ0, the v vs. ξ curves tend to collapse on the harmonic solution.

Figura 2
Phase-plane representation of the solution of the problem of communicating vessels. The initial conditions are the following: a) ξ0=1.0, v=0; b) ξ0=0.75, v=0. The colours magenta, red, orange, green cyan correspond to the following values of γ: 0.15, 0.25, 0.40, 0.55, 0.70. The dashed black circle corresponds to the solution for γ =1. Periodicity of the solution can be argued by the closing of all curves.

Another useful hint on the periodicity of the solutions of equation (17) can be given by perturbation analysis. In fact, by writing

(20) ξ τ ξ ( 0 ) τ + ε ξ ( 1 ) τ ,

where ξ0τ and ξ1τ are functions to be found, we may rewrite equation (17) as follows:

(21) [ ε ξ ( 0 ) + 1 ] ( ξ ( 0 ) + ε ξ ( 1 ) ) + 1 2 ε ξ ( 0 ) 2 + ξ ( 0 ) + ε ξ ( 1 ) = 0 ,

where second and higher order terms in ε have been neglected. By carrying out further algebra and by still retaining only first-order terms in ε, we write:

(22) ξ ( 0 ) + ξ ( 0 ) + ε ( ξ ( 1 ) + ξ ( 1 ) + ξ ( 0 ) ξ ( 0 ) + 1 2 ξ ( 0 ) 2 ) = 0.

Therefore, the above equation splits into two different parts, one for the unperturbed solution ξ0 only, one for the perturbed term ξ1, so that, we have:

(23a) ξ ( 0 ) + ξ ( 0 ) = 0 ,
(23b) ξ ( 1 ) + ξ ( 1 ) = - ξ ( 0 ) ξ ( 0 ) + 1 2 ξ ( 0 ) 2 .

Notice that the differential equation (23a) describes free harmonic oscillations, whose solution is

(24) ξ ( 0 ) τ = A sin τ + ϕ ,

where the constants A and ϕ are to be determined by means of the initial conditions (19) applied to the solution ξτ. However, notion of the solution to equation (23a) is necessary to solve equation (23b). In this way, by substituting equation (24) into equation (23b) we obtain a differential equation describing the motion of a forced harmonic oscillator:

(25) ξ ( 1 ) + ξ ( 1 ) = A 2 4 1 - 3 cos 2 τ + 2 ϕ .

where a higher harmonic term appears. A general solution to equation (25) can be found by writing it as the sum of the homogeneous and particular solutions as follows:

(26) ξ ( 1 ) τ = B sin τ + ψ + A 2 4 1 + cos 2 τ + 2 ϕ .

In this way, the approximate solution ξτ is, according to equation (20), the following:

(27) ξ ( τ ) = A sin ( τ + ϕ ) + ε B sin ( τ + ψ ) + ε A 2 4 [ 1 + cos ( 2 τ + 2 ϕ ) ] .

where A, B, ϕ, and ψ need to be evaluated according to (19), so that:

(28a) ξ 0 = A sin ϕ + ε B sin ψ + ε A 2 4 1 + cos 2 ϕ ;
(28b) 0 = A cos ϕ + ε B cos ψ + ε A 2 2 sin 2 ϕ .

We thus find the following solution by separating the zero-order and the first-order terms:

(29) A = ξ 0 ; B = 0 ; ϕ = π 2 ; ψ = 0.

Finally, we write equation (27) as follows:

(30) ξ τ = ξ 0 cos τ + ε ξ 0 2 4 1 - cos 2 τ .

By taking the derivative with respect to τ, we can also write:

(31) v τ = - ξ 0 sin τ + ε ξ 0 2 2 sin 2 τ .

We can thus rewrite these solutions in terms of the original variable y1:

(32) y 1 t = λ 1 + ξ 0 cos g λ t + ε ξ 0 2 4 1 - cos 2 g λ t .

By taking the derivative with respect to t, we can also write:

(33) y ˙ 1 t = - λ ξ 0 g λ sin g λ t 1 - ε ξ 0 cos g λ t .

The constant ξ0 is defined in equation (19) and the quantities y2 and y˙2 can be known by means of equation (9).

The above solutions are periodic. In fact, we can now prove that the maximum deviation from a circular path in the phase plane of the functions ξ and v is a first-order term in ε. By considering equation (30) and (31) we can see that

(34) ξ 2 + v 2 = ξ 0 2 - ε ξ 0 3 cos τ sin 2 τ .

Let us now consider the radial distance Δr from the circumference ξ2+v2=ξ02 in the phase plane and the curve in (34):

(35) Δ r = ξ 0 1 - 1 - ε ξ 0 cos τ sin 2 τ .

To first order in ε, we can write:

(36) Δ r ε ξ 0 2 2 cos τ sin 2 τ .

The maximum value of Δr can be found by maximizing the time dependent term in (36), obtaining:

(37) Δ r = ε ξ 0 2 3 3 .

Therefore, the effects due to non-linearity of the ordinary differential equation (17) are rather weak when very small values of ε are considered. A comparison between the numerical solutions of equation (18a) and (18b) and the analytical solutions (30) and (31) obtained by means of the above perturbation approach for ε=0.1 and ε=0.2 is shown in Fig 3a and 3b. The latter figures, as for Fig. 2a and 2b, have been obtained by means of the software Mathematica.

Figura 3
Phase-plane representation of the numerical (dashed) and approximated (full line) solution. The latter solution has been obtained by means of a perturbation analysis to first order in the parameter ε. The following values of ε=1-γ have been chosen: ε=0.10 (a) and ε=0.20 (b).

4. Conclusions

The celebrated system of communicating vessels, which also finds applications in other subjects than physics, has been seen to possess interesting dynamical properties. In the present work we have considered two cylindrical vessels containing a non-viscous fluid. The two cylinders are connected by a small horizontal channel placed at their base. In the symmetric case, in which the two containers are perfectly identical, the system behaves like a harmonic oscillator, whose angular frequency ω0 is given by the following simple relation:

(38) ω 0 = g λ ,

where λ is the height, measured with respect to the bottom of the vessels, up to which the free surface of the liquid rises at equilibrium. Surprisingly, when we consider the asymmetric case, harmonic oscillations recede because of non-linear effects. The resulting non-linear differential equation preserves periodicity, as both a phase-plane analysis and a perturbation approach suggest.

As for the didactical value of the present work, we may affirm that the present study could be useful to students approaching the topic of nonlinear dynamical systems for the first time. In fact, the non-linear effects in the dynamical properties of the system can be seen either by means of a phase-plane analysis or by a perturbation approach. Both methods confirm periodic behavior of the system in the presence of non-linearity. Moreover, as a starting point students can rely on the harmonic oscillator mechanical equivalent system when the parameter ε=1-S1/S2, defining the degree of asymmetry between the sections S1 and S2 of the two cylindrical vessels, is zero. Nonlinear effects can be seen to gradually arise as ε increases. Finally, students may notice that, while analytic solution of the problem is possible by means of a perturbation approach for small values of the parameter ε, numerical analysis is necessary for value of ε approaching one.

Referências

  • [1]
    D. Halliday, R. Resnick and J. Walker, Fundamentals of Physics (Wiley and Sons, New York, 2005), 7th ed.
  • [2]
    F. van Waarden, in: Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective, edited by J.R. Hollingsworth, K.H. Müller and E.J. Hollingsworth (Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, 2005), chapter 9.
  • [3]
    P.A. Tipler, Physics (Worth Publishers Inc., New York, 1980), chapter 14.
  • [4]
    R.J. Donnelly and O. Penrose, Phys. Rev. 103, 1137 (1956).
  • [5]
    M.J. Smith, J.J. Kobine and F.A. Davidson, Proc. R. Soc. A 464, 905 (2008).
  • [6]
    S.L.T. de Souza, I.L. Caldas, R.L. Viana, J.M. Balthazar and R.M.L.R.F. Brasil, Journal of Sound and Vibration 289, 987 (2006).
  • [7]
    R. De Luca and P. Desideri, Eur. J. Phys. 34, 189 (2013).

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    2017

History

  • Received
    22 Dec 2016
  • Reviewed
    26 Jan 2017
  • Accepted
    05 Feb 2017
Sociedade Brasileira de Física Caixa Postal 66328, 05389-970 São Paulo SP - Brazil - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: marcio@sbfisica.org.br