SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 issue2Management of recurrent distal tracheal stenosis using an endoprosthesis: a case report author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia

Print version ISSN 1806-3713

J. bras. pneumol. vol.34 no.2 São Paulo Feb. 2008

 

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

 

Bedside tracheostomy: practical considerations

 

 

Ricardo Mingarini TerraI; Angelo FernandezI; Ricardo Helbert BammannII

IAttending Physician. Department of Thoracic Surgery of the Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo – HCFMUSP, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas – São Paulo, Brazil
IIThoracic Surgeon. Emílio Ribas Institute of Infectology, São Paulo, Brazil

 

 

We congratulate Perfeito et al.(1) on the publication of their original article in the final 2007 edition of the Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology, and we share their opinion on conventional bedside tracheostomy: it is feasible and safe. Our experience with this technique is similar to that described in their article. In our study, also published in 2007, we found that only 24 (4.3%) of the 552 patients studied presented complications.(2) We concluded that tracheostomy can be safely performed at the bedside, even in patients presenting factors previously described as contra-indications to tracheostomy out of the operating room: obesity; advance age; spinal trauma; etc.(3-5) In addition, we analyzed other variables, such as mean time of the procedure (19 min) and estimated cost of the procedure in Brazil (253 USD and 494 USD, respectively, for the open and percutaneous techniques performed in the ICU versus 496 USD for the open technique performed in the operating room).

We also share the concern expressed by Perfeito et al. regarding the importance of training residents, which should be an objective of a teaching hospital. Since it is a simple surgical procedure, tracheostomy is frequently delegated to less experienced surgeons, without the necessary supervision. In a limited-resource environment, this lack of experience can have undesirable consequences, ranging from an unnecessary increase in surgical time, which is wearisome to the support team - not accustomed to surgical difficulties - to more disastrous complications, principally those related to the need to maintain ventilatory support. Undoubtedly, supervision by a surgeon who is experienced in manipulating airway access is crucial to ensuring the safety of the procedure and obtaining favorable outcomes.

However, in this context, the principal aspect that must be borne in mind is that the ICU is a dynamic and multidisciplinary environment. Therefore, the teams of intensivists, nurses and physical therapists should actively participate in the process. A lack of knowledge often leads to resistance to the implementation of the method. Therefore, continuing education is essential so that everyone feels secure and comfortable with performing tracheostomy in this environment. A strict protocol, known by all those involved in the process, should be established and followed, according to the conditions and peculiarities of each institution. Patients with severe disease present little tolerance for periods of apnea and are therefore at great risk during transport, as well as during tube exchange, especially when the procedure is performed by a poorly trained team. Therefore, bedside tracheostomy is often, albeit sporadically, performed in such patients. However, rather than being recommended only in severe cases, bedside tracheostomy should be a routine procedure in the ICU. The following aspects should be included in the protocol: clinical recommendation; consent from the patient or legal guardian; material; necessary human resources; surgical technique; and postoperative care (correct fixation of the tube, cuff pressure, follow-up evaluation up to the time of decannulation, etc.) These premises considered, we second Perfeito et al., whom we congratulate for raising such an important issue. We believe that conventional tracheostomy can be safely performed at the bedside, and that it constitutes an appropriate option for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

 

References

1. Perfeito JA, da Mata CA, Forte V, Carnaghi M, Tamura N, Leão LE. Tracheostomy in the ICU: Is it worthwhile? J Bras Pneumol 2007;33(6):687-90.        [ Links ]

2. Terra RM, Fernandez A, Bammann RH, Castro AC, Ishy A, Junqueira JJ. Open bedside tracheostomy: routine procedure for patients under prolonged mechanical ventilation. Clinics 2007;62(4):427-32.        [ Links ]

3. Upadhyay A, Maurer J, Turner J, Tiszenkel H, Rosengart T. Elective bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. J Am Coll Surg 1996;183(1):51-5.        [ Links ]

4. Wease GL, Frikker M, Villalba M, Glover J. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit. Arch Surg 1996;131(5):552-4; discussion 554-5.        [ Links ]

5. Massick DD, Yao S, Powell DM, Griesen D, Hobgood T, Allen JN, et al. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: A prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 2001;111(3):494-500.        [ Links ]