SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue2Respiratory muscles: myths and secrets author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia

Print version ISSN 1806-3713

J. bras. pneumol. vol.41 no.2 São Paulo Mar./Apr. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-37132015000200001 

Editorial

Relevance of anamnesis and of biomarkers in the assessment of smoking among patients with airway disease

Importância da anamnese e dos biomarcadores na avaliação de tabagismo nas doenças de vias aéreas

Ubiratan de Paula Santos 1  

1Attending Physician. Smoking Cessation Outpatient Clinic, Pulmonary Division, Heart Institute, University of São Paulo School of Medicine Hospital das Clínicas, São Paulo, Brazil

"The prevalence of smoking in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma is high-the relevance of anamnesis and of the use of biomarkers in clinical practice." - Ubiratan de Paula Santos.

Smoking is the leading preventable risk factor for death. It is estimated to have been responsible for 6.3 million deaths globally in 2010. ( 1 ) Studies have suggested that smokers live, on average, 10 years shorter than nonsmokers and that one in every two smokers will die from a tobacco-related disease.( 2 , 3 ) The reason for such an impact is the presence, in the smoke inhaled from burning tobacco, of approximately 5,300 chemicals, including 250 toxic components, 72 carcinogens (600 trillion molecules of carcinogens per cigarette smoked), and 4 × 109 fine particles/cm³ of inhaled smoke.( 4 ) Among the major impairments associated with smoking are airway and interstitial respiratory diseases, especially COPD and more than 10 types of cancer, including head and neck cancer( 5 ) and lung cancer, which is ranked 1st in the global ranking of cancer deaths,( 6 ) smoking being responsible for more than 80% of cases. In addition to these known morbidities, evidence from new studies suggest that smoking increases the risk of death from renal failure, intestinal ischemia, breast cancer, and prostate cancer,( 7 ) thereby broadening the spectrum and dimension of the effects of smoking. In other diseases such as asthma, although various studies have suggested that smoking is a causal factor, there is still controversy over it; however, evidence confirms that smoking or exposure to environmental tobacco smoke makes asthma control difficult and makes exacerbations more frequent.( 8 ) Because of greater knowledge of the risks and because of the measures adopted by countries, the prevalence of smokers has been gradually declining, especially in Brazil, with a reduction in the prevalence of smokers, in the population aged 18 years or older, from 35.4% to 16.8% between 1989 and 2010.( 9 )

In this issue, the Brazilian Journal of Pulmonology publishes an interesting study( 10 ) involving patients with COPD or asthma and a control group of healthy smokers and nonsmokers, comparing smoking markers to determine the accuracy of the self-report of smoking status. The data are impressive: 29% of the patients with asthma or COPD who self-reported being nonsmokers had high urinary cotinine values and high exhaled CO values. If we consider urinary cotinine levels alone, whose cut-off value of 200 ng/mL is used in order to discriminate smokers from nonsmokers, they were too high to be explained only by the exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, and the prevalence of self-reported nonsmokers who had high levels of this marker reached 38% (29% and 47% of the patients with asthma and COPD, respectively). As indicated in the article,( 10 ) the values observed for false information were higher than those observed in other studies, which can be explained, in part, by differences in the prevalence of smokers in the local populations during the various study periods. Research conducted in various countries has shown that the prevalence of smokers among patients with COPD( 11 , 12 ) or asthma( 12 , 13 ) is similar to that observed among smokers in general. In the study by Stelmach et al.,( 10 ) since it was carried out at a specialized care hospital, we should also consider the possibility of patients fearing discontinuation of follow-up as one of the factors influencing such a large number of false reports.

The study( 10 ) results strongly suggest that, in the approach to patients with asthma or COPD, the question on smoking status be reiterated and this status be assessed (including with the use of biomarkers) at each visit, especially in patients with more frequent exacerbations, and that help be offered to those who wish to quit smoking. Although cotinine is a more accurate marker of tobacco smoke exposure than is the measure of exhaled CO, the latter can be used for this purpose, since it is inexpensive, it is measured instantaneously, and its values do not differ significantly between smokers with COPD and those without.( 14 ) A study conducted in the United Kingdom revealed that only 13% of smokers received prescriptions for smoking cessation treatment, although those with COPD were particularly likely to be prescribed such treatment.( 15 ) In addition, another study by the same group( 16 ) revealed a high (17%) prevalence of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke in asthma patients, and such exposure is known to be associated with exacerbations.( 8 ) Although studies have suggested that, with the aid of medications, patients with chronic disease have rates of cessation similar to those of patients without chronic disease,( 11 ) it is possible that patients with chronic lung disease who continue smoking have more difficulty in quitting smoking, requiring greater support as compared with smokers without such comorbidities, including greater screening for psychological morbidities associated with smoking,( 17 ) which can influence cessation success.

References

Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K,Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2224-60. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013;381(9867):628; Lancet. 2013;381(9874):1276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61766-8 . [ Links ]

Doll R, Peto R, Boreham J, Sutherland I. Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors. BMJ. 2004;328(7455):1519. [ Links ]

Pirie K, Peto R, Reeves GK, Green J, Beral V; Million Women Study Collaborators. The 21st century hazards of smoking and benefits of stopping: a prospective study of one million women in the UK. Lancet. 2013;381(9861):133-41. [ Links ]

IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Personal habits and indoor combustions. Volume 100 E. A review of human carcinogens. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt E):1-538. [ Links ]

Almeida AÁ, Bandeira CM, Gonçalves AJ, Araújo AJ. Nicotine dependence and smoking habits in patients with head and neck cancer. J Bras Pneumol. 2014;40(3):286-93. [ Links ]

World Health Organization. International Agency for Research on Cancer [homepage on the Internet]. Geneva: WHO; [cited 2015 Mar 17]. Globocan 2012: Estimated cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide 2012. Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/ia/World/atlas.htmlLinks ]

Carter BD, Abnet CC, Feskanich D, Freedman ND, Hartge P, Lewis CE, et al. Smoking and mortality--beyond established causes. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(7):631-40. [ Links ]

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The Health Consequences of Smoking: 50 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014. [ Links ]

Levy D, de Almeida LM, Szklo A. The Brazil SimSmoke policy simulation model: the effect of strong tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in a middle income nation. PLoS Med. 2012;9(11):e1001336. [ Links ]

Stelmach R, Fernandes FL, Carvalho-Pinto RM, Athanazio RA, Rached SZ, Prado GF, et al. Comparison between objective measures of smoking and self-reported smoking status in patients with asthma or COPD: are our patients telling us the truth? J Bras Pneumol. 2015;41(2):124-132 . [ Links ]

Tønnesen P. Smoking cessation and COPD. Eur Respir Rev. 2013;22(127):37-43. [ Links ]

Vozoris NT, Stanbrook MB. Smoking prevalence, behaviours, and cessation among individuals with COPD or asthma. Respir Med. 2011;105(3):477-84. [ Links ]

Lemiere C, Boulet LP. Cigarette smoking and asthma: a dangerous mix. Can Respir J. 2005;12(2):79-80. [ Links ]

Chatkin G, Chatkin JM, Aued G, Petersen GO, Jeremias ET, Thiesen FV. Evaluation of the exhaled carbon monoxide levels in smokers with COPD. J Bras Pneumol. 2010;36(3):332-8. [ Links ]

Huang Y, Britton J, Hubbard R, Lewis S. Who receives prescriptions for smoking cessation medications? An association rule mining analysis using a large primary care database. Tob Control. 2013;22(4):274-9. [ Links ]

Dias-Júnior SA, Pinto RC, Angelini L, Fernandes FL, Cukier A, Stelmach R. Prevalence of active and passive smoking in a population of patients with asthma. J Bras Pneumol. 2009;35(3):261-5. [ Links ]

Afonso MF, Alves MG. Psychological morbidity as a moderator of intention to quit smoking: a study of smokers and former smokers. J Bras Pneumol. 2013;39(4):461-8. [ Links ]

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.