Predictores de la innovación administrativa: funciones y métodos organizacionales - Hospitales de México y de Colombia -

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Determinar en qué medida las funciones y métodos organizacionales influyen en la innovación administrativa.

Metodología:

La presente investigación tiene enfoque cuantitativo con alcance exploratorio, su diseño fue no experimental y transversal. Es un estudio correlacional. Los datos fueron recolectados mediante la aplicación de un instrumento de medición (cuestionario) llevándose a cabo en México en 2011 y en Colombia en 2013. Se recolectaron 244 observaciones de mandos medios y directivos de hospitales públicos y privados.

Fundamentación teórica:

A través de la Teoría de recursos y capacidades se buscó soporte a las hipótesis de la investigación.

Resultados:

Las funciones y métodos organizacionales se asocian y son predictores de la innovación administrativa.

Contribuições:

A través de los resultados de esta investigación se pudo demostrar en una muestra de mandos medios y directivos médicos, paramédicos y administrativos que laboran en hospitales de México y de Colombia la influencia positiva de funciones y métodos organizacionales en la innovación administrativa, por lo que este estudio desde la brecha en la literatura contribuye al conocimiento actual sobre innovación organizacional al probar la relación con la innovación administrativa.

Palabras clave:
Innovación administrativa; Métodos organizacionales; Recursos organizacionales; Hospitales

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine to what extent functions and organizational methods influence on administrative innovation.

Design/methodology/approach:

This research is quantitative approach, with a not experimental and transversal design. The hypothesis was supported by using a transactional study with a sample of Mexican and Colombian hospitals through the perception of their high and medium level managers. The hospital sampling was by convenience.

Findings

- Organizational functions and methods are associated and are predictors of administrative innovation.

Practical implications:

As long as the hospital encourages the development of training and knowledge methods, autonomy methods for employees are developed, and when performance appraisal takes place in hospital, new methods will be able to develop and organize the routines and the management procedures, allocation of responsibilities and power among employees could be developed, as well as to develop new structure concepts for workplace, organizational practices and external relationships.

Keywords:
Administrative innovation; Organizational methods; Organizational resources; Hospitals

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERENCIAS

• Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). Organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82. doi: 10.1177/003803857100500105
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857100500105
• Anand, N., Gardner, H. K., & Morris, T. (2007). Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 406-428.
• Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700108
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
• Barney, J., Wright, M., & Ketchen Jr., D. J. (2001). The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management, 27(6), 625-641. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00114-3
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(01)00114-3
• Bharathi, G. (2007). Intellectual capital statements: what do they measure and report. The ICFAI Journal of Accounting Research, 6(4), 52-64.
• Bond, I., & Houston, M. B. (2003). Barriers to matching new technologies and market opportunities in established firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(2), 120-135. doi: 10.1111/1540-5885.2002005
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.2002005
• Broos, E., & Cronjé, J. C. (2009). Information society needs of managers in a large governmental organisation. Educational Technology and Society, 12(1), 285-297.
• Caldart, A., Vassolo, R., & Silvestri, L. (2010, August). Induced variation in administrative systems: experimenting with contexts for innovation. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, Montreal, QC, CA, 1.
• Calderón, G., Cuartas, J., & Álvarez, C. M. (2009). Transformación organizacional y prácticas innovadoras de gestión humana. Innovar, 19(35), 151-166.
• Cheng, T., & Mohd, A. (2010). The influence of knowledge management effectiveness on administrative innovation among Malaysian manufacturing firms. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 15(1), 63-77.
• Conner, K. (1991). A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organizational economics: Do we have a new theory of the firm? Journal of Management, 17(1), 21-154. doi: 10.1177/014920639101700109
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700109
• Conner, K., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A Resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus Opportunism Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
• Constantinescu, M. (2009). Knowledge management: focus on innovation and labor productivity in a knowledge-based economy. The IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(1), 7-33.
• Coutinho, L. G., & Ferraz, J. C. (Coords.). (1995). Estudo da competitividade da industria brasileira Campinas: Papirus.
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
• Daft, R. L.(1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210. doi: 10.2307/255754
  » https://doi.org/10.2307/255754
• Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. The Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
• DeVries, D. L., Morrison, A. M., Shullman, S. L., & Gerlach, M.L. (1981). Performance appraisal on the line Greensboro, N. C: Center for Creative Leadership.
• Drucker, P. (1993). Post-capitalist society NewYork: Harper Business.
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10-11), 1105-1121. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E
• Fijalkowska, J. (2008). Review of guidelines for the intelectual capital statement - how to manage and communicate the company´s knowledge. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 8(3), 327-338.
• Fong, P., & Kwok, C. (2009). Organizational culture and knowledge management success at project and organizational level in contracting firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 135(12), 1348-1356.
• García, S. (2009). La innovación como reto directivo. In Menguzzato, M. (Dir.). La dirección de empresas ante los retos del siglo XXI: homenaje al Profesor Juan José Renau Piqueras (pp. 193-202). Valencia: Universitat de Valencia.
• Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
• Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firms. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250171110
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
• Greenan, N. (2003). Organisational change, technology, employment and skills: an empirical study of French manufacturing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2), 287-316.
• Griffy-Brown, C., & Chun, M. (2007). Aligning business strategies and IS resources in japanese SMEs: a resource-based view. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 10(3), 28-51. doi: 10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856448
  » https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2007.10856448
• Haas, M. R. (2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 989-1008.
• Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135-144. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250130205
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250130205
• Helfat, C., & PETERAF, M. (2003). The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 24(10), 997-1010.
• Jimenez, A. I., Martínez, M. P., & Gonzalez, O. (2008). Implicaciones de la orientación proactiva hacie el mercado, la cooperación y el uso de las TIC en los procesos de innovación de productos y servicios. Universia Business Review, (20), 54-67.
• Kangas, L. (2009). Assesing the value of the relationship between organizational culture types and knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1), 29-35.
• Kinkel, S., Lay, G., & Wengel, J. (2004). Innovation: mehr als forschung und en twicklung: wachstumschancen auf anderen innovationspfade (PI-Mitteilungen, 33). Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI. Retrived from http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints?urn:nbn:de:0011-n-215417.pdf
  » http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints?urn:nbn:de:0011-n-215417.pdf
• Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational innovation: the influence of individual organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713.
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
• Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3(3), 383-397.
• Lam, A. (2005). Organizational innovation. In Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D., & Nelson, R. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 115-147). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Langfred, C. W. (2007). The downside of self-management: a longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), p. 885-900. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
  » https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.26279196
• Lee, C. (1985). Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness: matching task types, appraisal process, and rater training. The Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 322-331.
• Leedy, P., & Ellis, J. Practical Research: planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall, 2002.
• Levine, D., Krehbiel, T. Y, & Berenson, M. (2006). Estadística para administración México: Pearson Educación.
• Liao, S., & Wu, C. (2010). System perspective of knowledge management, organizational learning, and organizational innovation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), 1096-1103.
• Liao, S., Fei, W., & Liu, C. (2008). Relations between knowledge inertia, organizational learning and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195.
• Martín, Q., Cabero, .A., & De Paz, Y. R. (2008). Tratamiento estadístico de datos con SPSS Madrid: Thomson.
• Milam, M. (2001). Knowledge management for higher education Retrieved from http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/higher.htm
  » http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-1/higher.htm
• Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1993). Economía, organización y gestión de la empresa. Revista de Economía Aplicada, 1(3), 203-207.
• Muñiz, J.; Hambleton, R. (s.d.) Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests. Papeles del psicólogo. Revista del Colegio Oficial de Psicología, 66(111), 63-70.
• Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 96-104.
• Nogueira, F. Y, & Marques, C. (2008). Organizational innovation: research into the information/training paths of decision-makers within hospital. Portuguese Journal of Management Studies, 13(2), 237-254.
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, & Statistical Office of the European. (2005). Manual de Oslo. Guía para la recogida e interpretación de datos sobre innovación España: Grupo Tragsa.
• Pasquini, M., & Mendes, M. (2009). Organizational values and innovative organizational knowledege creation. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(1), 36-56.
• Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the growth of the firm Oxford: Blackwell.
• Pérez, C. (2008). Minería de datos: técnicas y herramientas Madri, España: Thomson.
• Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstone of competitive advantage: a resource based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179-191.
• Pinto, J. J., Fernández, R., Martínez, L., & Kauffmann, G. (2006). Análisis del énfasis en la innovación en la implantación del “Middle-Up-Down Management Model”: un estudio evolutivo en las empresas manufactureras del país vasco: aspectos metodológicos y empíricos. Estudios Gerenciales, 22(101), 37-59.
• Quinn, J. B. (1992). Intelligent enterprise: a knowledge and service based paradigm for industry New York: The Free Press.
• Quintero-Campos, L. J. (2010). Aportes teóricos para el estudio de un sistema de innovación. Innovar, 20(38), 57-76.
• Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations New York: Free Press.
• Ruekert, R. W., Walker, O. C., & Roering, K. J. (1985). The organization of marketing activities: a contingency theory of structure and performance. The Journal of Marketing, 49(1), 13-25.
• Santos, M. L., Sanzo, M. J., García, N., & Trespalacios, J. A. (2009). Procesos de aprendizaje en las pyme industriales españolas: efectos en la innovación, calidad de la oferta y resultados empresariales. Innovar, 19(33), 35-52.
• Sanidas, E. (2005). Organizational Innovations and economic growth: organosis and growth of firms, sectors, and countries Cheltenham, UK: Elgar.
• Schienstock, G., Rantanen, E., & Tyni, P. (2009). Organizational innovations and new management practices: their diffusion and influence on firms’ performance: results from a finnish firm survey [IAREG Working Paper 1.2.d]. Intangible Assets and Regional Economic Growth, Barcelona, Spain.
• Tanninen, K., Jantunen, A., & Saksa, J. M. (2008). Adoption of administrative innovation within organization: an empirical study of TQM metamorphosis. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 5(3), 321-340. doi: 10.1142/S0219877008001412
  » https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219877008001412
• Torrent-Sellens, J., & Ficapal-Cusí, P. (2010). ¿Nuevas fuentes co-innovadoras de la productividad empresarial? Innovar, 20(38), 111-124.
• Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
• Tsai, W., & GHOSHAL, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. The Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
• Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Ventura, V. (1996). Análisis dinámico de la estrategia empresarial: un ensayo interdisciplinar Oviedo: Universidad de Oviedo.
• Wang, V. L.; AHMED, P. K. (2003). Organizational learning: a critical review. The Learning Organization, United Kingdom, 10(1), 8-17.
• Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180. doi: 10.1002/smj.4250050207
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
• Zack, M. (1999). Developing a Knowledge Strategy. California Management Review, 41(3), 125-145.

• 2
  Processo de avaliação: Double Blind Review

Fechas de Publicación

• Publicación en esta colección
  Jan-Mar 2015

Histórico

• Recibido
  27 Nov 2013
• Acepto
  05 Mar 2015