Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Stakeholder Theory and Value Creation Models in Brazilian Firms

ABSTRACT

Objective:

The purpose of this study is to understand how top Brazilian firms think about and communicate value creation to their stakeholders.

Design/methodology/approach:

We use qualitative content analysis methodology to analyze the sustainability or annual integrated reports of the top 25 Brazilian firms by sales revenue.

Findings:

Based on our analysis, these firms were classified into three main types of stakeholder value creation models: narrow, broad, or transitioning from narrow to broad. We find that many of the firms in our sample are in a transition state between narrow and broad stakeholder value creation models. We also identify seven areas of concentration discussed by firms in creating value for stakeholders: better stakeholder relationships, better work environment, environmental preservation, increased customer base, local development, reputation, and stakeholder dialogue.

Practical implications:

This study shows a trend towards broader stakeholder value creation models in Brazilian firms. The findings of this study may inform practitioners interested in broadening their value creation models.

Originality/value:

This study adds to the discussion of stakeholder theory in the Brazilian context by understanding variations in value creation orientation in Brazil.

Keywords:
value creation; stakeholders; Brazil

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERENCES

  • Atkinson, P., & Hammersley, M. (2007). Ethnography: principles in practice (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Bartley, T., & Child, C. (2014). Shaming the corporation: the social production of targets and the anti-sweatshop movement. American Sociological Review, 79(4), 653-659 doi: 10.1177/0003122414540653.
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122414540653
  • Boaventura, J. M. G. (2012). Dominância de stakeholders em empresas brasileiras: contribuições à teoria dos stakeholders (Doctoral thesis). Department of Management, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting of São Paulo University, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Boaventura, J. M. G., Cardoso, F. R., Silva, E. S., & Silva, R. S. (2009). Teoria dos stakeholders e teoria da firma: um estudo sobre a hierarquização das funções-objetivo em empresas brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 11(32), 289-307.
  • Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470.
  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48.
  • Christian Aid. (2004) Behind the mask: the real face of CSR London: Autor.
  • Costa, B. K., Vieira, S. F. A., Boaventura, J. M. G., & Anez, M. E. M. (2013). A influência dos stakeholders na estratégia de órgãos públicos: o caso da diretoria de turismo de Guarulhos/SP. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 5(1), 28-40.
  • Crisóstomo, V. L., Freire, F. S., & Vasconcellos, F. C. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 295-309.
  • Forbes. Forbes Global 2000 (2014 list) - The World’s Biggest Public Companies. (2014, May 22). Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/global2000/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter:All%20industries_filter:Brazil_filter:All%20states
    » http://www.forbes.com/global2000/list/#page:1_sort:0_direction:asc_search:_filter:All%20industries_filter:Brazil_filter:All%20states
  • Fox-Wolfgramm, S. J., Boal, K. B., & Hunt, J. G. (1998). Organizational adaptation to institutional change: A comparative study of first-order change in prospector and defender banks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 87-126.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing Inc.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409-421.
  • Freeman, R. E. (2000). Business ethics at the millennium. Business Ethics Quarterly , 10(1), 169-180.
  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: survival, reputation, and success New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Freeman, R. E., Martin, K., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3), 364-369.
  • Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: a meta-analysis of event studies. Business and Society, 36(3), 221-243.
  • Gallon, A. V., & Beuren, I. M. (2007). Análise do conteúdo da evidenciação nos relatórios da administração das empresas participantes dos níveis de governança da Bovespa. UnB Contábil, 10(2), 11-42.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
  • Gonçalves, P. C., Boaventura, J. M. G., Costa, B. K., & Fischmann, A. A. (2008). Stakeholders na atividade hospitalar: uma investigação setorial no Estado de São Paulo. Administração Estratégica, 7(2), 84-101.
  • Harris, J., & Freeman, R. E. (2008). The impossibility of the separation thesis: a response to Joakim Sandberg. Business Ethics Quarterly , 18(4), 541-548.
  • Harrison, J. F., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal , 31(1), 58-74.
  • Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351-371.
  • Jensen, M. C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8-21.
  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
  • Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404-437.
  • Junqueira, R. R., & Wada, E. K. (2011). Stakeholders: estratégia organizacional e relacionamento. Estudo de casos múltiplos do setor hoteleiro. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estratégia, 10(3), 94-125.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Machado, C. A. P., Fº. (2002). Responsabilidade social corporativa e a criação de valor para as organizações: um estudo multicasos (Doctoral thesis). Faculty of Economics, Management and Accounting of São Paulo University, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Martin, K. E., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). The separation of technology and ethics in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(4), 353-364.
  • Matos, S., & Silvestre, B. S. (2013). Managing stakeholder relations when developing sustainable business models: the case of the Brazilian energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 61-73.
  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review , 22(4), 853-886.
  • Naddler, D. A., Shaw, R. B., & Walton, A. E. (1995). Discontinuous change: leading organizational transformation San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • Phillips, R. A. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly , 7(1), 51-66.
  • Stout, L. A. (2012). The shareholder value myth: how putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  • Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15(3), 350-363.
  • Tantalo, C., & Priem, C. L. (2014). Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal . doi: 10.1002/smj.2337
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2337
  • Van Buren, H. J., III (2001). If fairness is the problem, is consent the solution? Integrating ISCT and stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly , 11(3), 481-499.
  • Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. In J. T. Spence, J. M. Darley, & D. J. Foss (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 361-386). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
  • 2
    Evaluation process: Double Blind Review

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr 2015

History

  • Received
    08 Aug 2014
  • Accepted
    29 May 2015
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br