Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Exploring Stakeholder Salience for the Adoption of Principles and Tools of Cleaner Production in Brazilian Companies

ABSTRACT

Objective:

The key objective of this paper is to show the primary environmental influences exerted by the government, economic agents and society on companies for the implementation of the principles and tools of cleaner production (CP), and the attributes (power, legitimacy and urgency) used by stakeholders to coerce companies into adopting these principles.

Design/methodology/approach:

The research method employed was the application of an exploratory survey in 102 Brazilian companies and the multi-varied evaluation of data by means of multiple correspondent analysis.

Findings:

The study shows that some principles of CP are little used by companies in Brazil. Concerning the influences on the adoption of CP, the government, economic agents and society are singled out as the important influencers. The government influence is manifest through the adoption of environmental regulating measures (power) in conjunction with sincere actions in environmental education (influence). The economic agents possess the power, legitimacy and urgency to influence the adoption of CP. Society’s influences are less relevant, in that Brazilian society has much less awareness of sustainable production and consumption as compared to other countries.

Practical implications:

This study shows that it is vital that Brazilian society learns more about sustainable production, because a society with no environmental conscience is a society with little means to demand the implementation of CP.

Originality/value:

The results of the study represent an important theoretical contribution in that, at present, there is little literature on the relationship between stakeholders and Cleaner Production. This is the first study in Brazil to address the subject.

Keywords:
Stakeholders Salience; Exogenous Influences; Cleaner Production; Brazil

Texto completo disponível apenas em PDF.

Full text available only in PDF format.

REFERENCES

  • AccountAbility. (2003). AA1000 Assurance Standard London: Accountability.
  • Agle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of Stakeholder Attributes and Salience, Corporate Performance and CEO Values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
  • Alkhafaji, A. F. (1989). A stakeholder approach to corporate governance. managing in a dynamic environment Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Álvarez-Gil, M. J., Berrone, P., Husillos, F. J., & Lado, N. (2007). Reverse logistics, stakeholders’ influence, organizational slack, and managers’ posture. Journal of Business Research, 60(5), 463-473.
  • Anastas, P. T., & Zimmerman, J. B. (2006). The twelve principles of green engineering as a foundation for sustainability. In M. A. Abraham (Ed.), Sustainability science and engineering: defining principles (pp. 11-32). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  • Aschehoug, S. H., Boks, C., & Støren, S. (2012). Environmental information from stakeholders supporting product development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 31(1), 1-13.
  • Ashford, N. A., & Caldart, C. C. (2001). Negotiated environmental and occupational health and safety agreements in the United States: lessons for policy. Journal of Cleaner Production , 9(1), 99-120.
  • Asif, M., Searcy, C., Zutshi, A., & Fisscher, O. A. M. (2013). An integrated management systems approach to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production , 56(1), 7-17.
  • Birch, A., Hon, K. K. B., & Short, T. (2012). Structure and output mechanisms in Design for Environment (DfE) tools. Journal of Cleaner Production , 35(1), 50-58.
  • Biswas, W. K. (2012). The importance of industrial ecology in engineering education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(2), 119-132.
  • Boons, F., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2013). Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production , 45(1), 9-19.
  • Boyle, C. (1999). Education, sustainability and cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production , 7(1), 83-87.
  • Bremmers, H., Omta, O., Kemp, R., & Haverkamp, D-J. (2007). Do stakeholder groups influence environmental management system development in the Dutch agri-food sector? Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(1), 214-231.
  • Campos, L. M. S. (2012). Environmental management systems (EMS) for small companies: a study in Southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production , 32(1), 141-148.
  • Chen, C., & Monahan, G. E. (2010). Environmental safety stock: the impacts of regulatory and voluntary control policies on production planning, inventory control, and environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1280-1292.
  • Chiu, A. S. F. (2011). Sustainable consumption and production policy options in Asia and the Pacific. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25(1), 413- 418.
  • Centro Nacional de Tecnologia Limpa (2003) Implementação de Programas de Produção mais Limpa Porto Alegre: Autor.
  • Ciccozzi, E., Checkenya, R., & Rodriguez, A. V. (2003). Recent experiences and challenges in promoting cleaner production investments in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production , 11(1), 629-638.
  • Clarkson, M. (1994). A risk-based model of stakeholder theory. Proceedings of the Toronto Conference on Stakeholder Theory, Toronto, CA, 2.
  • Currie, R. R., Seaton, S., & Wesley, F. (2009). Determining stakeholders for feasibility analysis. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(1), 41-63.
  • Dong, S., Burritt, R., & Qian, W. (2014). Salient stakeholders in corporate social responsibility reporting by Chinese mining and minerals companies. Journal of Cleaner Production , 84(1), 59-69.
  • Driscoll C., Starik M. (2004). The primordial stakeholder: advancing the conceptual consideration of stakeholder status for the natural environment. Journal of Business Ethics, 49(1), 55-73.
  • Edwards, K. L. (2002). Towards more strategic product design for manufacture and assembly: priorities for concurrent engineering. Materials and Design, 23(1), 651-656.
  • Environmental Protect Act 1990 (1990). An act to make provision for the improved control of pollution arising from certain industrial and other processes. Retrieved from http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43
    » http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/43
  • Environmental Protection Agency. (1993). Status report on the use of environmental labels worldwide Cambridge: Abt. Associates Inc.
  • Forza, C. (2002). Survey research in operation management: a process-based perspective. International Journal of Operation & Production Management, 22(2), 152-194.
  • Franke, B., Grothe-Senf, A. (2006). Avaliação de desempenho ambiental ampliado (ADAA): um modelo para comparação de empresas. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Ambientais, 5, 16-21.
  • Freeman, C. (1988). The economics of industrial innovation Harmonds Worth: Penguins Books Ltda.
  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach Massachusetts: Pitman.
  • Freeman, R. E., Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: a new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88-106.
  • Friedman, A., & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: theory and practice Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gago, R. F., & Antolín, M. N. (2004). Stakeholder salience in corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Governance, 4(3), 65-76.
  • Gaziulusoy, A., Boyle, C., & McDowall, R. (2012). System innovation for sustainability: a systemic double-flow scenario method for companies. Journal of Cleaner Production , 45(1), 104-116.
  • Geng, Y., Xinbei, W., Qinghua, Z., & Hengxin, Z. (2010). Regional initiatives on promoting cleaner production in China: a case of Liaoning. Journal of Cleaner Production , 18(15), 1502-1508.
  • Gifford, E. J. M. (2010). Effective stakeholder engagement: the factors that contribute to stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics , 1, 79-97.
  • Glavic, P., & Lukman, R. (2007). Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production , 15(18), 1875-1885.
  • Gravrilescu, M., (2004). Cleaner production as a tool for sustainable development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 3(1), 45-70.
  • Greenacre, M. (2007). Correspondence analysis in practice (2a ed.). New York: Chapman and Hall.
  • Guerina, T. F. (2006). A survey of sustainable development initiatives in the Australian mining and minerals industry. Minerals & Energy - Raw Materials Report, 20(3-4), 11-44.
  • Haigh, N., & Griffiths, A. (2009). The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change. Business Strategy and the Environment , 18(6), 347-359.
  • Hale, M. (1996). Ecolabeling and cleaner production: principles, problems, education and training in relation to the adoption of environmentally sound production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production , 4(2), 85-95.
  • Hallstedt, S. I., Thompson, A. W., & Lindahl, P. (2013). Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production , 51(1), 277-288.
  • Harangozo, G., & Zilahy, G. (2015). Cooperation between business and non-governmental organizations to promote sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production , 89(1), 18-31.
  • Harrington, D. R. (2012). Two-stage adoption of different types of pollution prevention (P2) activities. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(3), 349-373.
  • Hong, J., & Li, X. (2013). Speeding up cleaner production in China through the improvement of cleaner production audit. Journal of Cleaner Production , 40(1), 129-135.
  • Hoof, B. V., & Thiell, M. (2014). Collaboration capacity for sustainable supply chain management: small and medium-sized enterprises in Mexico. Journal of Cleaner Production , 67(15), 239-248.
  • Hoque, A., & Clarke, A. (2013). Greening of industries in Bangladesh: pollution prevention practices. Journal of Cleaner Production , 51(1), 47-56.
  • Hsu, C-W., Lee, W-H., & Chao, W-C. (2013). Materiality analysis model in sustainability reporting: a case study at Lite-On Technology Corporation. Journal of Cleaner Production , 57(1), 142-151.
  • Igarashi, M., De Boer, L., & Fet, A.M. (2013). What is required for greener supplier selection? A literature review and conceptual model development. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 19(4), 247-263.
  • Instituto Ethos. (2014). Empresas e responsabilidade social Retrieved from http://www3.ethos.org.br/conteudo/associados/
    » http://www3.ethos.org.br/conteudo/associados/
  • ISO 14020:1998 (1998). Environmental labels and declarations - General principles. This International Standard establishes guiding principles for the development and use of environmental labels and declarations. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=24313
    » http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=24313
  • ISO 14042:2000 (2000). Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Life cycle impact assessment. Describes the principles and framework for life cycle assessment (LCA) including. Retrieved from http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=34425
    » http://www.iso.org/iso/home/store/catalogue_ics/catalogue_detail_ics.htm?csnumber=34425
  • Jimenez, J. B. L., & Lorente, J. J. C. (2001). Environmental performance as an operations objective. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(12), 1553-1572.
  • Kiperstok, A., Esquerre, K., Kalid, R., Sales, E., & Oliveira, G. (2013). Rationalizing the Use of Water in Industry - Part 1: Summary of the instruments developed by the Clean Technology Network in the state of Bahia and main results obtained. Journal of Environmental Protection, 4(5), 486-496.
  • Le, X-Q., Vu, V-H., Hens, L., & Heur, B. V. (2014). Stakeholder perceptions and involvement in the implementation of EMS in ports in Vietnam and Cambodia. Journal of Cleaner Production , 64(1), 173-193
  • Lee, R. M; & Robbins, S.B. (2000). Understanding social connectedness in College Women and Men. Journal of Counseling and Development 78(4), 484-491.
  • Liu, C., & Zhang, K. (2013). Industrial ecology and water utilization of the marine chemical industry: A case study of Hai Hua Group (HHG), China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 70(1), 78-85.
  • Lyra, M. G., Gomes, R. C., & Jacovine, L. A. G. (2009). O papel dos stakeholders na sustentabilidade da empresa: contribuições para construção de um modelo de análise. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3), 39-52.
  • Madden, K., Young, R., Brady, K., & Hall, J. (2005). Eco-efficiency learning module Geneva: WBCSD. Retrieved from http://www.wbcsd.org/pages/EDocument/EDocumentDetails.aspx?ID=13593
    » http://www.wbcsd.org/pages/EDocument/EDocumentDetails.aspx?ID=13593
  • Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics , 83(1), 177-192.
  • Mauser, W., Klepper, G., Martin Rice, M., Schmalzbauer, B. S., Hackmann, H., Leemans, R., Moore, H. (2013). Transdisciplinary global change research: the co-creation of knowledge for sustainability. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5, 420-431.
  • McDonald, S., & Young, S. (2012). Cross-sector collaboration shaping corporate social responsibility best practice within the mining industry. Journal of Cleaner Production , 37(1), 54-67.
  • Ministério do Meio Ambiente. (2011). Plano de Ação para Produção e Consumo Sustentáveis - PPCS Retrieved from http://www.mma.gov.br/responsabilidade-socioambiental/producao-e-consumo-sustentavel/plano-nacional
    » http://www.mma.gov.br/responsabilidade-socioambiental/producao-e-consumo-sustentavel/plano-nacional
  • Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
  • Munsamy, M., Telukdarie, A., & Zhang, W. (2014). Cleaner technology systems for surface finishing: evaporative coolers for close circuiting low temperature plating process. Journal of Cleaner Production , 66(1), 664-671.
  • Ngugi, I. K., Johnsen, R. E., & Erdélyi, P. (2010). Relational capabilities for value co-creation and innovation in SMEs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(2), 260-278.
  • Nilsson, H., Tunçer, B., & Thidell, A. (2004). The use of eco-labeling like initiatives on food products to promote quality insurance - is there enough credibility? Journal of Cleaner Production , 12(5), 517-526.
  • O’Rourke, A. (2003). The message and methods of ethical investment. Journal of Cleaner Production , 11(6), 683-693.
  • Ortegon, K., Nies, L. F., & Sutherland, J. W. (2013). Preparing for end of service life of wind turbines. Journal of Cleaner Production , 39(1), 191-199.
  • Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). O futuro da competição: como desenvolver diferenciais inovadores em parceria com os clientes Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
  • Ritthoff, M., Rohn, H., & Liedtke, C. (2002) . Calculating MIPS: resource productivity of products and services. [Wuppertal Spezial 27e]. Wuppertal Institue ofr Climate, Environment and Energy, Wuppertal, Germany. Retrieved from http://www.wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wiberitrag/MIT_v2.pdf
    » http://www.wupperinst.org/uploads/tx_wiberitrag/MIT_v2.pdf
  • Rogers, D. S., & Tibben-Lembke, R. S. (1998). Going backwards: reverse logistics trends and practices University of Nevada. Reno: CLM.
  • Rogers, K., & Seager, T. P. (2009). Environmental decision-making using life cycle impact assessment and stochastic multiattribute decision analysis: a case study on alternative transportation fuels. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(6), 1718-1723.
  • Romero-Gámez, M., Suárez-Rey, E. M., Antón, A., Castilla, N., & Soriano, T. (2012). Environmental impact of screen house and open-field cultivation using a life cycle analysis: The case study of green bean production. Journal of Cleaner Production , 28(1), 63-69.
  • Samaras, S. A. (2010) The measurement of stakeholder salience: a strategy for the exploration of stakeholder theories. International Journal Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies, 2(3), 285-296.
  • Seidman, I. E. (1991). Interviewing as qualitative research. a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences New York: Teachers College/Columbia University Press.
  • Simon, A., Bernardo, M., Karapetrovic, S., & Casadesús, M. (2011). Integration of standardized environmental and quality management systems audits. Journal of Cleaner Production , 19(17-18), 2057-2065.
  • Srivastava, S. K. (2007). Green supply-chain management: a state-of-the-art literature review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 53-80.
  • Starik M. (1994). What is a stakeholder? Essay by Mark Starik. In The Toronto conference: Reflections on stakeholder theory. Business and Society, 33(1), 89-95.
  • Taylor, B. (2006). Encouraging industry to assess and implement cleaner production measures. Journal of Cleaner Production , 14(6-7), 601-609.
  • Teizer, J., Cheng, T., & Fang, Y. (2013). Location tracking and data visualization technology to advance construction ironworkers’ education and training in safety and productivity. Automation in Construction, 35(1), 53-68.
  • Testa, F., Rizzi, F., Daddi, T., Gusmerotti, N. M., Frey, F., & Iraldo, F. (2014). EMAS and ISO 14001: the differences in effectively improving environmental performance. Journal of Cleaner Production , 68(1), 1-9.
  • Thompson, J. K., Wartick, S. L., & Smith, H. L. (1991). Integrating corporate social performance and stakeholder management: implications for a research agenda in small business. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 12(1), 207-230.
  • Thrane, M., Nielsen, E. H., & Christensen, P. (2009). Clean production in Danish fish processing: experiences, status and possible future strategies. Journal of Clean Production, 17(3), 380-390.
  • Tsoulfas, G. T., & Pappis, C. P. (2008). A model for supply chains environmental performance analysis and decision-making. Journal of Clean Production, 16(15), 1647-1657.
  • United Nations Environment Programme. (1990). Understanding resource efficient and Cleaner Production Retrieved from http://www.unep.fr/scp/cp/ understanding/concept.htm
    » http://www.unep.fr/scp/cp/ understanding/concept.htm
  • Vachon, S., & Klassen, R. D. (2008). Environmental management and manufacturing performance: the role of collaboration in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 229-315.
  • Whitlark, D. B., & Smith, S. M. (2001). Using correspondence analysis to map relationships. Marketing Research, 13(3), 22-27.
  • Wu, D. D., Olson, D. L., & Birge, J. R. (2013). Risk management in cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production , 53(1), 1-6.
  • Wu, G. C., Ding, J. H., & Chen, P. S. (2012). The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 135(2), 618-636.
  • Yuksel, H. (2008). An empirical evaluation of clean production practices in Turkey. Journal of Clean Production, 16(1), 50-57.
  • Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Dong, Z. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2010). Towards corporate environmental information disclosure: an empirical study in China. Journal of Cleaner Production , 18(12), 1142-1148.
  • Zhang, G., & Zhao, Z. (2012). Green packaging management of logistics enterprises. Physics Procedia, 24(1), 900-905.
  • 2
    Evaluation process: Double Blind Review

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    Apr 2015

History

  • Received
    20 July 2014
  • Accepted
    29 May 2015
Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado Fundação Escola de Comércio Álvares Penteado, Av. da Liberdade, 532, 01.502-001 , São Paulo, SP, Brasil , (+55 11) 3272-2340 , (+55 11) 3272-2302, (+55 11) 3272-2302 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: rbgn@fecap.br