SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.26 special issue 1Contributions to the debate on integrality and oral healthCase Report Form for oral health assessments: methodological considerations author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Brazilian Oral Research

Print version ISSN 1806-8324

Braz. oral res. vol.26 no.spe1 São Paulo  2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242012000700002 

SHORT COMMUNICATION
CARIOLOGY

Genetics and caries – prospects*

 

 

Alexandre Rezende Vieira

Departments of Oral Biology and Pediatric Dentistry, and Center for Craniofacial and Dental Genetics, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Corresponding author

 

 


ABSTRACT

Caries remains the most prevalent non-contagious infectious disease in humans. It is clear that the current approaches to decrease the prevalence of caries in human populations, including water fluoridation and school-based programs, are not enough to protect everyone. The scientific community has suggested the need for innovative work in a number of areas in cariology, encompassing disease etiology, epidemiology, definition, prevention, and treatment. We have pioneered the work on genetic studies to identify genes and genetic markers of diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic value. This paper summarizes a presentation that elaborated on these initial findings.

Descriptors: Dental Caries; Genetics; Genes.


 

Summary of the presentation

Although there is growing evidence that genetics contributes to caries, historically, there has been a lack of studies addressing the problem from this angle. Caries is the consequence of the interaction of host factors, microbial infection, and substrate-favoring cariogenic microbiota. It is not difficult to propose underlying genetic mechanisms modulating each of these factors, such as saliva factors, which influence bacterial adhesion or acidic buffer capacity.

When looking at models that can incorporate genetic influences, it is important to consider the facts. In regard to types of diet and sugar consumption, a decline in caries experience based on DMFT/dmft scores in the past 5 decades in the US can be observed despite the very high sugar intake of the population.1,2 This decline is likely due to measures such as school-based education programs and fluoride exposure. In general, promoting dietary changes alone has little or no impact on the future caries experience of the population. Water fluoridation also showed an effect on caries experience in the US in the same period, with a decline in DMFT scores. However, not all individuals living in fluoridated areas experienced lower disease rates, suggesting fluoride alone is not enough to protect everyone.

Human models, including studies with twins, provide evidence that caries involves a genetic component. The classic Vipeholm study3 clearly showed that greater exposure to foods rich in sugar increased the severity of caries, but although the individuals in the study consumed caramels four times a day in between meals, 20% of them had not developed any caries lesions after one year. This result suggests that individual susceptibility also modulates caries experience. Only one publication related to the Vipeholm study looked at familial aggregation related to caries, and it showed that parents and siblings of subjects of the Vipeholm study who did not develop any caries lesions had significantly lower caries prevalence than the parents and siblings of the remaining subjects.4 Twin studies also provide evidence that genetics influences caries. Several variables related to caries experience (i.e. number of teeth present, percentage of teeth restored, percentage of surfaces restored, percentage of teeth affected by caries, percentage of surfaces affected by caries) show statistically significant concordance rates in monozygotic twins, but not in dizygotic twins.5 These studies measure heritability, or the amount of variation in the disease frequency that is due to genetic variation, and twins have been studied in the US, Brazil, and China, with heritability values ranging from 25% to 80%, depending on the disease-related variable studied.

Animal models have also been used to investigate the genetic contribution to caries, particularly in Japan. The basic design of this approach involves crossing strains particularly susceptible to the disease with resistant strains. It has been suggested that loci in chromosomes 1, 2, 7, 8, and 17 contribute to caries susceptibility.6-8

Our studies of the genetic contribution to caries involve two study designs:

  • candidate-gene approaches and
  • genome-wide scan approaches.

Since caries is influenced particularly by the environment (oral hygiene habits, types of diet, fluoride exposure, access to care), the main emphasis of our group was to characterize the study population In order to decrease heterogeneity. We observed that a collection of about 100 dry skulls derived from individuals that lived in the northeast of the United States more than 100 years ago had high caries experience, but not all specimens had signs of the disease.9 These individuals lived in times prior to organized dentistry, and most likely had the same oral hygiene practices and dietary habits as the general population. Since we have access to population samples from many areas, we decided to focus on groups with limited access to dental care and information about oral health. We performed the first genome-wide linkage studies on caries in a group of families from the Philippines. These families lived in rural areas and had similar cultural and behavioral habits. We detected a suggestive linkage between low caries experience and loci 5q13.3, 14q11.2, and Xq27.1. Moreover, high caries experience was linked to loci 13q31.1 and 14q24.3.10 The candidate-gene approaches include three main groups of genes:

  • genes involved in enamel development,
  • in saliva formation and composition, and
  • in immune response.

These studies include populations from Tiquisate, Guatemala, Istanbul, Turkey, Pittsburgh, USA, and the Patagonian region of Argentina. All these populations have similar socioeconomic status and access to dental care. Initial results are very encouraging and suggest associations can be found between these candidate genes and high caries susceptibility.11-13

 

Conclusion

In summary, we believe genetic susceptibility to caries can be identified under specific experimental conditions. Several genes most likely influence individual susceptibility to caries, and these include genes involved in enamel development, in saliva function, and in immune response.

 

References

1. Welsh JA, Sharma A, Abramson JL, Vaccarino V, Gillespie C, Vos MB. Caloric sweetener consumption and dyslipidemia among US adults. JAMA. 2010 Apr;303(15):1490-7.         [ Links ]

2. Brown LJ, Wall TP, Lazar V. Trends in caries among adults 18 to 45 years old. J Am Dent Assoc. 2002 Jul;133(7):827-34.         [ Links ]

3. Gustafsson BE, Quensel CE, Lanke LS, Lundqvist C, Grahnén H, Bonow BE, et al.. The Vipeholm dental caries study: the effects of different levels of carbohydrate intake in 436 individuals observed for five years. Acta Odontol Scand. 1954 Sep;11(3-4):232-64.         [ Links ]

4. Böök JA, Grahnén H. Clinical and genetical studies of dental caries. II. Parents and sibs of adult highly resistant (caries-free) propositi. Odontol Revy. 1953 Jan;4(1):1-53.         [ Links ]

5. Boraas JC, Messer LB, Till MJ. A genetic contribution to dental caries, occlusion, and morphology as demonstrated by twins reared apart. J Dent Res. 1988 Sep;67(9):1150-5.         [ Links ]

6. Suzuki N, Kurihara Y, Kurihara Y. Dental caries susceptibility in mice is closely linked to the H-2 region on chromosome 17. Caries Res. 1998 Jul-Aug;32(4):262-5.         [ Links ]

7. Uematsu T, Nariyama M, Shimizu K, Maeda T. Mapping of affected gene(s) to dental caries susceptibility on mouse chromosome 2. Pediatr Dent J. 2003 Jan;13(1):75-81.         [ Links ]

8. Nariyama M, Shimizu K, Uematsu T, Maeda T. Identification of chromosomes associated with dental caries susceptibility using quantitative trait locus analysis in mice. Caries Res. 2004 Mar-Apr;38(2):79-84.         [ Links ]

9. Rose EK, Vieira AR. Caries and periodontal disease: insights from two US populations living a century apart. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2008 Jan;6(1):23-8.         [ Links ]

10. Vieira AR, Marazita ML, McHenry TG. Genome-wide scan finds suggestive caries loci. J Dent Res. 2008 May;87(5):435-9.         [ Links ]

11. Deeley K, Letra A, Rose EK, Brandon CA, Resick JM, Marazita ML, et al.. Possible association of amelogenin to high caries experience in a Guatemalan-Mayan population. Caries Res. 2008 Jan-Feb;42(1):8-13.         [ Links ]

12. Patir A, Seymen F, Yildirim M, Deeley K, Cooper ME, Marazita ML, Vieira AR. Enamel formation genes are associated with high caries experience in Turkish children. Caries Res. 2008 May-Jun;42(5):394-400.         [ Links ]

13. Ozturk A, Famili P, Vieira AR. The antimicrobial peptide DEFB1 is associated with caries. J Dent Res. 2010 Jun;89(6):631-6.         [ Links ]

 

 

Corresponding Author:
Alexandre Rezende Vieira
E-mail: arv11@pitt.edu

Submitted: Oct 28, 2011
Accepted for publication: Jan 16, 2012
Last revision: Aug 20, 2012

 

 

* Paper presented at the "Oral Health Promotion: Expanding the Boundaries of Knowledge" International Symposium, held at the 16th Congress of the Brazilian Association for Oral Health Promotion (ABOPREV), June 30 to July 2, 2011, Brasília, DF, Brazil.
Declaration of Interests: The author certifies that he has no commercial or associative interest that represents a conflict of interest in connection with the manuscript.