SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Caries management through the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) approach and glass-ionomers: update 2013Research in the field of health, dentistry, telehealth and teledentistry author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Oral Research

Print version ISSN 1806-8324On-line version ISSN 1807-3107

Braz. oral res. vol.28 no.1 São Paulo  2014  Epub Jan 24, 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242014.50000006 

Editorial

Life course epidemiology and its implication for oral health

Flávio Fernando Demarco(a) 

Karen Glazer Peres(b) 

Marco Aurélio Peres(b) 

(a)Graduate Programs in Dentistry and Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil

(b)Australia Research Centre for Population Oral Health, School of Dentistry, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

Life course epidemiology has been defined as the study of the long-term effects of biological, behavioral and psychosocial pathways that operate across the life course as well as across generations, and influence the development of chronic disease.1 These studies are designed to help the establishment of causal relationships between exposures and outcomes, taking into consideration the duration and the time of disease development.

Chronic diseases have a long period of development, generating a mismatch between the exposure, the beginning of the disease and the first clinical signals. Oral health is an excellent area to study life course determinants of the diseases since the most impacting oral diseases and disorders are cumulative and chronic, present relatively high prevalence and are easy to be identified.2 Several models have been postulated to explain the relationship between exposure and outcome during the life course.

The biological programming model3 considers that there is a limited time window in which an exposure can have adverse or protective effects on development and subsequent disease outcome. For example, the delay in tooth emergence at 12 months of age was associated with those who were shorter at birth, and those who were classified as stunted. Also, the prevalence of not having lower permanent molars at 6 years old was higher among children who had a chronic malnutrition indicator at 6 months of life.4

The second model is the critical period with modifier effect, which considers that there are key early-life exposures which interact with later ones, increasing or diminishing the risk to develop chronic disease. A study investigating the effect of breastfeeding and non-nutritive sucking habits on the occlusion patterns at 6 years old highlighted that the presence of breastfeeding combined with the non-use of pacifiers ensured a protective effect of the presence of posterior crossbite in the primary dentition.5

The third model, accumulation-of-risk, suggests that detrimental and beneficial exposures accumulated through life affect health. Therefore, the number, duration and severity of the exposure generate a cumulative damage in the biologic system. A clear gradient according to the number of episodes of poverty from birth to adulthood was associated with fewer sound teeth in young adulthood. The group who never experienced poverty in life had a higher prevalence of dental visits and routine of going to the dentist and checkups. The higher the number of episodes of poverty during the course of life, the higher the proportions of smokers and individuals with unsound teeth in young adult life.6

Finally, the chain-of-risk model is another version of the accumulation of risk model, in which one adverse/benefic exposure leads to another to influence health. The instruction of oral hygiene by a dentist during adolescence had an impact in the reduction of tooth loss at 24 years of age.7

These proposed models may not be exclusive, and may occur at the same time, emphasizing the complex interactions between social environment and biological and behavioral aspects involved in the development of chronic oral diseases and conditions.

Longitudinal prospective studies, such as birth cohort studies, are the most appropriate design to investigate the life course epidemiology, allowing the collection of exposure at the time of event, therefore minimizing the occurrence of recall bias.

To study oral health nested in multidisciplinary cohort studies is very important: firstly, because birth cohort studies allow the assessment of the "natural history" of dental diseases and dental outcomes; secondly, it is possible to understand better the causal mechanisms that explain oral conditions; finally, because there is some evidence regarding the association between oral health and general health. However, the direction of these associations remains unclear. Oral diseases may be a risk factor for general health and, on the other hand, general health may play an important role in oral conditions; for example, a higher number of obesity episodes in the life course increased the occurrence of dental calculus in young adulthood, which may be a risk factor for periodontal disease.8

The contribution of life course epidemiology, using findings from birth cohort studies, seem to be essential for understanding some unclear mechanisms involved in the etiology of some oral diseases and conditions. Thus, a research agenda to increase the number and quality of studies in this area along with long term period financial support are crucial.

References

1. Kuh D, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lynch J, Hallqvist J, Power C. Life course epidemiology. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Oct;57(10):778-83. [ Links ]

2. Barker DJP. Mothers, babies and health in later life. 2nd ed. Edinburgh: Series Churchill Livingstone; 1998. 217 p. [ Links ]

3. Peres MA, Peres KG, Demarco FF. A saúde bucal no ciclo vital - acúmulos de risco ao longo da vida. In: Antunes JLF, Peres MA. Epidemiologia da Saúde Bucal. 2nd ed. São Paulo: Santos; 2013. p 391-415. [ Links ]

4. Bastos JL, Peres MA, Peres KG, Barros AJ. Infant growth, development and tooth emergence patterns: a longitudinal study from birth to 6 years of age. Arch Oral Biol. 2007 Jun;52(6):598-606. [ Links ]

5. Peres KG, Barros AJ, Peres MA, Victora CG. Effects of breastfeeding and sucking habits on malocclusion in a birth cohort study. Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Jun;41(3):343-50. [ Links ]

6. Peres MA, Peres KG, Thomson WM, Broadbent JM, Gigante DP, Horta BL. The influence of family income trajectories from birth to adulthood on adult oral health: findings from the 1982 Pelotas birth cohort. Am J Public Health. 2011 Apr;101(4):730-6. [ Links ]

7. Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL, Gigante DP, Demarco FF. Life-course determinants of need for dental prostheses at age 24. J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):733-8. [ Links ]

8. Castilhos ED, Horta BL, Gigante DP, Demarco FF, Peres KG, Peres MA. Association between obesity and periodontal disease in young adults: a population-based birth cohort. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Aug;39(8):717-24. [ Links ]

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.