Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

The 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the 100 most-cited papers in the field of oral medicine and pathology over time, identifying the areas of more intense research. Papers in journals of oral medicine and pathology were identified using the Web of Science database. The specified research period was between 1900 and 2019. Descriptive statistics was used to analyze the data. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to explore the relationships among Web of Science citations, Dimensions citations, and Altmetric Attention Score. The number of citations of an article in the top 100 most-cited papers published in 1953 or later ranged from 541 to 3623. The papers were published in 47 different journals. The New England Journal of Medicine, American Cancer Society, and Nature Genetics published the most papers. Authors from 18 different countries published papers on head and neck cancer, craniofacial congenital anomalies, and osteonecrosis. Most of the papers were laboratory and descriptive studies. A correlation analysis showed a strong correlation only between Web of Science and Dimensions citations. In sum, although non-specific journals for pathology and oral medicine published the majority of the 100 most-cited papers, this biometric citation study show that head and neck cancer was the issue with the most citations. Together, these results make an important scientific contribution by providing a historical perspective on the research carried out.

Oral Medicine; Pathology, Oral; Bibliometrics

Introduction

The publication of scientific papers in peer-reviewed journals is the most common method of disseminating scientific research, and, therefore, a vast amount of published literature is easily accessible in different fields and disciplines. It is estimated that the number of scientific publications double every 15–20 years.11. Celeste RK, Broadbent JM, Moyses SJ. Half-century of Dental Public Health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;44(6):557-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249...
However, readers cannot always assess the quality of the publications they read. For the evaluation of papers, bibliometric indicators have been used and one of the most accepted qualitative assessment of scientific publications is the number of citations.22. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, Citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575...
This parameter can help researchers to verify changing research focuses and to detect and acknowledge gaps.11. Celeste RK, Broadbent JM, Moyses SJ. Half-century of Dental Public Health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;44(6):557-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249...
,22. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, Citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575...
Moreover, highly cited papers may promote change in clinical practice and trigger discussions, controversies, and additional research.33. Pena-Cristóbal M, Diniz-Freitas M, Monteiro L, Diz Dios P, Warnakulasuriya S. The 100 most cited articles on oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Apr;47(4):333-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12686
https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12686...

The first bibliometric study was performed in 1987 to describe important medical advances reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association.44. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987 Jan;257(1):52-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.033900...
After this study, several bibliometric studies have been carried out to evaluate the most-cited papers in different areas.55. Lucena MF, Teixeira PE, Bonin Pinto C, Fregni F. Top 100 cited noninvasive neuromodulation clinical trials. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jun;16(6):451-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1615440
https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.16...
,66. Montinaro V, Giliberti M, Villani C, Montinaro A. Citation classics: ranking of the top 100 most cited articles in nephrology. Clin Kidney J. 2019 Feb;12(1):6-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy033
https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy033...
,77. Xie L, Chen Z, Wang H, Zheng C, Jiang J. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on atlantoaxial spine surgery based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137(May):435-442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.1...
In dentistry, the subjects of studies in the field of bibliometrics have included dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology;88. Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L. The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol. 2015 Oct;31(5):350-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195
https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195...
endodontics;99. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.0...
,1010. Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited papers in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1650-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.0...
,1111. Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, Yalçın TY. A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Nov;77(8):574-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.16...
general dentistry;1212. Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-...
implant dentistry;1313. Alarcón MA, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM Jr. The 300 most-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104...
,1414. Chiang HS, Huang RY, Weng PW, Mau LP, Su CC, Tsai YC, et al. Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):97-110.,1515. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):555-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331...
paediatric dentistry;1616. Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483...
,1717. Perazzo MF, Otoni AL, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):692-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563...
periodontics;1818. Faggion CM Jr, Málaga L, Monje A, Trescher AL, Listl S, Alarcón MA. The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2021-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-...
and orthodontics.1919. Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):785-96. https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1...
,2020. Hui J, Han Z, Geng G, Yan W, Shao P. The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):491-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1
https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1...
However, a bibliometric study has yet to be carried out for oral medicine and pathology. Thus, the objective of this study was to perform a bibliometric analysis of the 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology. This study will enable oral medicine professionals, pathologists, students, and researchers in the field of oral medicine and pathology to recognize the most commonly discussed research and clinical issues, analyzing the papers most cited. Consequently, the results of this study can shed light on the efforts of the researchers to evaluate and/or find solutions to oral diseases, and can aid in identify studies that serve as references in the field.

Methodology

This bibliometric study was carried out to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited papers in the field of oral medicine and pathology. The search was conducted using the Thomson Reuters Web of Science (WOS) citation indexing database (http://www.webofknowledge.com). Specifically, the work was carried out using the “All databases” option, which includes WOS (the main collection), Derwent Innovations Index, KCI - Korean Journal Database, Russian Science Citation Index, and the SciELO Citations Index. Papers published between 1900 and 2019 were included in the analysis, without restrictions on language.

The search strategy used combined terms with the field tag TS (Topic) and the Boolean operator OR in the advanced search tool: TS: (oral pathology) OR TS: (stomatology) OR TS: (oral medicine) OR TS: (oral oncology) OR TS: (oral disease) OR TS: (dental disease) OR TS: (oral) OR TS: (odont) OR TS: (mouth) OR TS: (teeth) OR TS: (tooth) OR TS: (tongue) OR TS: (oral manifestation) OR TS: (dentistry) OR TS: (dentist) OR TS: (dental). The search was performed in all databases on November 19, 2019 and retrieved a total of 2,645,482 papers that were ordered by number of citations. Two authors (AJM and RAM), independently, selected the papers using the abstracts, and the full-text versions when necessary. Any disagreement over data extraction was resolved through discussion and consensus. The inclusion criterion was that the paper be on a topic related to the field of oral medicine and pathology. Papers not related to the field of oral medicine and pathology, and papers on periodontology, cariology, anatomic variation, and normal condition were excluded. In cases of disagreement between the two reviewers regarding the inclusion of a paper, a third author (HMJ) made the definitive decision.

After the final list was approved, the following information was extracted for each paper: reference information (authors, title, periodical, year, volume, and page), origin of the paper (as defined by the corresponding author), paper subject, study type, the number of citations in WOS, and the number of citations per year. The International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) and year of creation were also examined for each journal. Additionally, the number of citations in the Dimensions database and Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) were obtained from the Dimensions free app (https://www.dimensions.ai).

Descriptive statistics using counts and proportions were used to describe the papers and the journals included in the study. Pearson’s correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between citation counts for individual papers, the AAS, and the Dimensions total citation count. A Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) < 0.3 was considered poor, 0.3–0.5 low, 0.5–0.7 moderate, 0.7–0.9 high, and > 0.9 very high. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

The most cited papers in oral medicine and pathology are listed in Table 1, in descending order based on the number of citations found in WOS. Average WOS citation per year, Dimensions, and AAS are also shown. The 100 most-cited papers were published between 1953 and 2015, and the most productive period was after 1990, with 78 papers out of 100 (Figure 1). The papers were published in 47 different journals, with 89% published in non-specific journals for oral medicine and pathology. The New England Journal of Medicine was the journal with the highest number of papers in the top-100 followed by the American Cancer Society and Nature Genetics, accounting for 24 papers out of 100 (Table 2).

Table 1
The 100 most-cited papers in pathology and oral medicine, ordered by number of the citations.

Figure 1
Number of citations per year.

Table 2
The 47 journals in which the top-100 cited papers were published.

The authors belonged to institutions in 18 different countries. Most were from institutions in the United States (55%) and Europe (35%). Papers were published in both developed (e.g., Japan, Australia, Canada, and Israel) and developing countries (e.g., China, Costa Rica, Taiwan, and Uganda) (Table 3). The most frequent field of study was head and neck cancer (n = 38), followed by congenital craniofacial anomaly (n = 8) and osteonecrosis (n = 8) (Table 4). The most common methodological designs were laboratory and descriptive studies, which accounted for 59% of the papers. Few studies have been clinical, retrospective, or comparative studies, or case-reports (Table 5).

Table 3
The 18 countries of origin of the top-100 cited papers in pathology and oral medicine.

Table 4
Study subjects in the 100-top cited papers in pathology and oral medicine.

Table 5
Study designs used in the 100-top cited papers in pathology and oral medicine.

In the correlation analysis, a strong correlation was found between the number of citations in WOS and the total number of citations in Dimensions (r = 0.976, p < 0.0001). A clear linear correlation between the number of citations of the papers in both databases can be seen in the scatter plot graph in Figure 2. Furthermore, a poor correlation was found between AAS and the number of citations in WOS for those papers which had an AAS (r = 0.147, p = 0.185).

Figure 2
Scatter plot examining the relationship between WOS citations and Dimensions citations.

Discussion

Analyzing the most frequently cited papers in a specific area enables researchers to identify the evolution of research in that area over time and to gain a better understanding of the areas of most interest and the existing gaps.11. Celeste RK, Broadbent JM, Moyses SJ. Half-century of Dental Public Health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;44(6):557-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249
https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249...
,22. Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, Citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575...
We aimed to identify and analyze the 100 most-cited papers in the field of oral medicine and pathology. Oral medicine and pathology are specialties at the intersection of medicine and dentistry, focused on oral symptoms, diagnosis, and the oral care of medically compromised patients.2121. Spielman AI. The future of oral medicine. Oral Dis. 2018 Mar;24(1-2):285-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12739
https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12739...
These fields were identified as specialties by Dr. Samuel Charles Miller when he founded the American Academy of Oral Medicine in 1945 (https://www.aaom.com/history). However, because oral medicine and pathology were considered medical fields for many years, there are few consolidated journals in our area and many researchers choose to submit to a medical journal. This is one possible explanation for why most of the publications were in non-specific journals. Of the 47 journals in which the top-100 cited papers were published, only 6 were publications specifically on oral medicine and pathology.

A citation classic refers to a paper with 100 or more citations; however, this number varies according to specialty.88. Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L. The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol. 2015 Oct;31(5):350-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195
https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195...
,99. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.0...
,1010. Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited papers in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1650-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.0...
,1111. Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, Yalçın TY. A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Nov;77(8):574-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.16...
,1212. Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-...
,1313. Alarcón MA, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM Jr. The 300 most-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104...
,1414. Chiang HS, Huang RY, Weng PW, Mau LP, Su CC, Tsai YC, et al. Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):97-110.,1515. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):555-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331...
,1616. Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483...
,1717. Perazzo MF, Otoni AL, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):692-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563...
,1818. Faggion CM Jr, Málaga L, Monje A, Trescher AL, Listl S, Alarcón MA. The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2021-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-...
,1919. Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):785-96. https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1...
In this study, the 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology received a greater number of citations, ranging from 541 to 3623. Therefore, all the papers on our list of the 100 most-cited are classics, as in some studies in dentistry.1111. Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, Yalçın TY. A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Nov;77(8):574-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.16...
,1212. Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-...
,1313. Alarcón MA, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM Jr. The 300 most-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104...
,1414. Chiang HS, Huang RY, Weng PW, Mau LP, Su CC, Tsai YC, et al. Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):97-110.,1515. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):555-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331
https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331...
,1818. Faggion CM Jr, Málaga L, Monje A, Trescher AL, Listl S, Alarcón MA. The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2021-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-...
,1919. Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):785-96. https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1...
However, other bibliometric studies in dentistry have listed papers with less than 100 citations.88. Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L. The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol. 2015 Oct;31(5):350-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195
https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195...
,99. Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.0...
,1010. Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited papers in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1650-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.0...
,1616. Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483...
,1717. Perazzo MF, Otoni AL, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):692-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563
https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563...
,2020. Hui J, Han Z, Geng G, Yan W, Shao P. The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):491-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1
https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1...
This discrepancy is possible because in addition to being a very specific area of dentistry, some journals were non-specific in terms of the area studied, as in our study.

In oral medicine and pathology, head and neck cancer is the most worrying disease, and numerous studies have been conducted on this topic over time.2222. Schutte HW, Heutink F, Wellenstein DJ, Broek GB, Hoogen FJ, Marres HA, et al. Impact of time to diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;162(4):446-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820906387
https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820906387...
Therefore, studies targeted at understanding, preventing, and/or treating head and neck cancer have made this condition the most-cited thematic field in the 100 most-cited papers in oral medicine and pathology. Congenital craniofacial anomaly and osteonecrosis were the others fields most-cited in the top 100 list, reflecting the holistic manner in which oral medicine and pathology deals with health.

Although the numbers of reviews are rapidly increasing in dentistry,2323. Bassani R, Pereira GK, Page MJ, Tricco AC, Moher D, Sarkis-Onofre R. Systematic reviews in dentistry: current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. J Dent. 2019 Mar;82:71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01....
only 9% of the 100 most-cited oral medicine and pathology papers were reviews (systematic reviews 4%, literature reviews 3%, and meta-analyses 2%). Thus, as authors prefer to cite reviews over research with a lower level of evidence,2424. Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med. 2003 Nov;1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2
https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2...
additional systematic reviews and meta-analyses are needed for various focused questions in oral medicine and pathology. Fifty nine percent of the papers were laboratory and descriptive studies. This finding is not surprising since these types of studies are the precursors and subsequent studies cite them.

The vast majority of the most-cited publications (90%) were from the United States or Europe. This result probably reflects the better funding policies and the large number of researchers that are in these countries. The United States and European countries are also the leading countries in terms of medical research publications. In addition, the citations originate more frequently from institutions located in the same country,2525. Pasterkamp G, Rotmans JI, De Kleun DV, Borst C. Citation frequency: a biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research papers. Scientometrics. 2007 Jan;70(1):153-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0109-5
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0109-...
and researchers from different parts of the world often move to these countries (https://www.iom.int/wmr/).

A strong correlation was observed between WOS and Dimensions citation counts. This finding indicates that the new database (Dimensions) can be used as an alternative to WOS. This result was previously observed in a study by Garcovich et al.1616. Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483...
However, AAS values were not directly comparable to WOS citation counts. Two other studies also found no correlation between AAS and WOS or Scopus citation count.1616. Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483...
,2626. Livas C, Delli K. Looking beyond traditional metrics in orthodontics: an Altmetric study on the most discussed papers on the web. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr;40(2):193-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx050 PMID:29016742
https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx050...
In addition, Thelwall2727. Thelwall M. Dimension: a competitor to Scopus and Web of science? J Informetrics. 2018 May;12(2):430-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.00...
reported that Dimensions is comparable in coverage to Scopus, suggesting that WOS, Dimensions and Scopus can all be used independently to assess research quality.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this biometric analysis identified the major areas of interest in the field of oral medicine and pathology. The most relevant areas that were explored in the 100 most-cited papers were head and neck cancer, congenital craniofacial anomaly, and osteonecrosis. The majority of the papers were laboratory and descriptive studies and were published in non-specific journals. Together, these findings can help guide the training of oral medicine and pathology students and reveal the gaps in the field.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Minas Gerais State Research Foundation (Minas Gerais, Brazil), National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (Brasilia, Brazil), and Coordination of Training of Higher Education Graduate Foundation (Brasilia, Brazil) for their assistance and support in carrying out this study.

References

  • 1
    Celeste RK, Broadbent JM, Moyses SJ. Half-century of Dental Public Health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016 Dec;44(6):557-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12249
  • 2
    Aksnes DW, Langfeldt L, Wouters P. Citations, Citation indicators, and research quality: an overview of basic concepts and theories. SAGE Open. 2019;9(1):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019829575
  • 3
    Pena-Cristóbal M, Diniz-Freitas M, Monteiro L, Diz Dios P, Warnakulasuriya S. The 100 most cited articles on oral cancer. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018 Apr;47(4):333-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12686
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/jop.12686
  • 4
    Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987 Jan;257(1):52-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028
    » https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1987.03390010056028
  • 5
    Lucena MF, Teixeira PE, Bonin Pinto C, Fregni F. Top 100 cited noninvasive neuromodulation clinical trials. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019 Jun;16(6):451-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1615440
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2019.1615440
  • 6
    Montinaro V, Giliberti M, Villani C, Montinaro A. Citation classics: ranking of the top 100 most cited articles in nephrology. Clin Kidney J. 2019 Feb;12(1):6-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy033
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfy033
  • 7
    Xie L, Chen Z, Wang H, Zheng C, Jiang J. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of scientific publications on atlantoaxial spine surgery based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137(May):435-442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171
  • 8
    Jafarzadeh H, Sarraf Shirazi A, Andersson L. The most-cited articles in dental, oral, and maxillofacial traumatology during 64 years. Dent Traumatol. 2015 Oct;31(5):350-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12195
  • 9
    Fardi A, Kodonas K, Gogos C, Economides N. Top-cited articles in endodontic journals. J Endod. 2011 Sep;37(9):1183-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2011.05.037
  • 10
    Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited papers in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod. 2018 Nov;44(11):1650-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
  • 11
    Yılmaz B, Dinçol ME, Yalçın TY. A bibliometric analysis of the 103 top-cited articles in endodontics. Acta Odontol Scand. 2019 Nov;77(8):574-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/00016357.2019.1621378
  • 12
    Feijoo JF, Limeres J, Fernández-Varela M, Ramos I, Diz P. The 100 most cited articles in dentistry. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):699-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1017-0
  • 13
    Alarcón MA, Esparza D, Montoya C, Monje A, Faggion CM Jr. The 300 most-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104
    » https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5104
  • 14
    Chiang HS, Huang RY, Weng PW, Mau LP, Su CC, Tsai YC, et al. Increasing prominence of implantology research: a chronological trend analysis of 100 top-cited articles in periodontal journals. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):97-110.
  • 15
    Fardi A, Kodonas K, Lillis T, Veis A. Top-cited papers in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 May/Jun;32(3):555-64. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331
    » https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.5331
  • 16
    Garcovich D, Marques Martinez L, Adobes Martin M. Citation classics in paediatric dentistry: a bibliometric study on the 100 most-cited articles. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2020 Apr;21(2):249-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-019-00483-z
  • 17
    Perazzo MF, Otoni AL, Costa MS, Granville-Granville AF, Paiva SM, Martins-Júnior PA. The top 100 most-cited papers in Paediatric Dentistry journals: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019 Nov;29(6):692-711. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12563
  • 18
    Faggion CM Jr, Málaga L, Monje A, Trescher AL, Listl S, Alarcón MA. The 300 most cited articles published in periodontology. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Jul;21(6):2021-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1990-1
  • 19
    Tarazona B, Lucas-Dominguez R, Paredes-Gallardo V, Alonso-Arroyo A, Vidal-Infer A. The 100 most-cited articles in orthodontics: a bibliometric study. Angle Orthod. 2018 Nov;88(6):785-96. https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
    » https://doi.org/10.2319/012418-65.1
  • 20
    Hui J, Han Z, Geng G, Yan W, Shao P. The 100 top-cited articles in orthodontics from 1975 to 2011. Angle Orthod. 2013 May;83(3):491-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1
    » https://doi.org/10.2319/040512-284.1
  • 21
    Spielman AI. The future of oral medicine. Oral Dis. 2018 Mar;24(1-2):285-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12739
    » https://doi.org/10.1111/odi.12739
  • 22
    Schutte HW, Heutink F, Wellenstein DJ, Broek GB, Hoogen FJ, Marres HA, et al. Impact of time to diagnosis and treatment in head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Apr;162(4):446-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820906387
    » https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599820906387
  • 23
    Bassani R, Pereira GK, Page MJ, Tricco AC, Moher D, Sarkis-Onofre R. Systematic reviews in dentistry: current status, epidemiological and reporting characteristics. J Dent. 2019 Mar;82:71-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2019.01.014
  • 24
    Montori VM, Wilczynski NL, Morgan D, Haynes RB; Hedges Team. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts. BMC Med. 2003 Nov;1(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2
    » https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-1-2
  • 25
    Pasterkamp G, Rotmans JI, De Kleun DV, Borst C. Citation frequency: a biased measure of research impact significantly influenced by the geographical origin of research papers. Scientometrics. 2007 Jan;70(1):153-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0109-5
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0109-5
  • 26
    Livas C, Delli K. Looking beyond traditional metrics in orthodontics: an Altmetric study on the most discussed papers on the web. Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr;40(2):193-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx050 PMID:29016742
    » https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjx050
  • 27
    Thelwall M. Dimension: a competitor to Scopus and Web of science? J Informetrics. 2018 May;12(2):430-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.006

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    18 Dec 2020
  • Date of issue
    2021

History

  • Received
    10 July 2020
  • Accepted
    22 Oct 2020
  • Reviewed
    10 Nov 2020
Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica - SBPqO Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227, 05508-000 São Paulo SP - Brazil, Tel. (55 11) 3044-2393/(55 11) 9-7557-1244 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: office.bor@ingroup.srv.br