Aumento de gengiva queratinizada em mucosa peri-implantar

Increased keratinized gigiva in peri-implant mucosa

Resumos

INTRODUÇÃO: Estudos recentes são direcionados a explorar a relação da faixa da mucosa queratinizada com a saúde dos tecidos peri-implantares. Quando esta faixa não é suficiente, uma cirurgia para o aumento de mucosa queratinizada pode ser indicada, pois tem sido relatado que a presença ou a reconstrução de tecido queratinizado ao redor de implantes pode facilitar os procedimentos restauradores, promover a estética e ainda permitir a manutenção de uma higienização oral rotineira sem irritação ou desconforto ao paciente. Dentre os procedimentos cirúrgicos disponíveis, a técnica do enxerto gengival livre é consagrada na literatura periodontal para aumento da faixa de mucosa queratinizada. OBJETIVO: Este estudo relata um caso clínico em que foi realizada cirurgia de enxerto gengival livre com objetivo de aumentar a faixa da mucosa queratinizada na região de implantes previamente instalados na maxila, para suporte de prótese tipo protocolo. RELATO DO CASO: Foi realizada a cirurgia de enxerto gengival livre na região anterior da maxila, obtido do palato, na qual haviam sido instalados implantes osseointegrados para suporte de prótese tipo protocolo e a mucosa peri-implantar apresentava-se sem tecido queratinizado e inflamada. Após dois meses de reparação da cirurgia mucogengival, foi possível observar que o enxerto gengival livre favoreceu a saúde peri-implantar e os procedimentos protéticos de moldagem. CONCLUSÃO: Diante dos resultados clínicos, pode-se concluir que o enxerto gengival livre é uma técnica previsível e de fácil realização para aumento da faixa de mucosa queratinizada em mucosa peri-implantar de prótese protocolo.

Enxerto/gengival livre; mucosa queratinizada; implantes dentários

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have evaluated the relationship between the width of keratinized mucosa and peri-implant tissue health. Insufficiently wide keratinized tissue can be increased surgically, for example by free gingival grafting. The presence or reconstruction of keratinized tissue around the implant can facilitate restorative procedures, promote aesthetics and allow the maintenance of an oral hygiene routine without irritation or discomfort to the patient. OBJECTIVE: To describe a patient who underwent free gingival graft surgery to increase the width of keratinized tissue in the region of previously implants to support a type of prosthetic protocol. CASE REPORT: A patient who had received dental implants to support a type of prosthetic protocol presented with inflamed peri‑implant mucosa, but with no keratinized tissue. Free gingival tissue was obtained from the palate and grafted into the anterior maxilla. Sixty days after muco-gingival surgery, we observed that the free gingival graft favored peri-implant health and prosthetic casting. CONCLUSION: The free gingival graft technique is both easy to perform and effective in increasing the width of keratinized mucosa following implantation.

Grafts/freegingival; keratinized mucosa; dental implants

• ¹
  Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent. 2011; 20:38-47. PMid:21613940. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3182181d3d
• ²
  Grover HS, Yadav A, Nanda P. Free gingival grafting to increase the zone of Keratinized tissue around implants. International Journal of Oral Implantology and Clinical Reseach 2011;2:117-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10012-1046
• ³
  Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Brånemark PI, Lindhe J, Eriksson B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:39-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80010-2
• ⁴
  Lekholm U, Adell R, Lindhe J, Brånemark PI, Eriksson B, Rockler B, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (II) A cross-sectional retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1986;15:53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(86)80011-4
• ⁵
  Schou S, Holmstrup P, Hijorting-Hansen E, Lang NP. Plaque-induced marginal tissue reactions of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992;3:149-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1992.030401.x
• ⁶
  Bashutski JD, Wang HL. Commom implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent. 2007;16:340-8. PMid:18091161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318159ca05
• ⁷
  Jung RE, Salieer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schimidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissue caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27:251-7. PMid:17694948.
• ⁸
  Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:73-80. PMid:17956569.
• ⁹
  Bouri A Jr, Bissada N, Al-Zahrani MS, Faddoul F, Nouneh I. Width of keratinized gingiva and the health status of the supporting tissues around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:323-6. PMid:18548930.
• ¹⁰
  Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of Keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol. 2006;77:1410-20. PMid:16881810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2006.050393
• ¹¹
  Adibrad M, Shahabuei M, Sahabi M. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on the health status of the supporting tissue around implants supporting overdentures. J Oral Implantol. 2009;35:232-7. PMid:19882819. http://dx.doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00035.1
• ¹²
  Zigdon H, Machtei EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa around implants affect clinical and immunological parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:387-92. PMid:18266873. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01492.x
• ¹³
  Garcia RV, Kraehenmann MA, Bezerra FJ, Mendes CM, Rapp GE. Clinical analysis of the soft tissue integration of non-submerged (ITI) and submerged (3i) implants: a prospective-controlled cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19:991-6. PMid:18828814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01345.x
• ¹⁴
  Park JC, Yang KB, Choi Y, Kim YT, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. A simple approach to preserve keratinized mucosa around implants using a pre-fabricated implant-reatined stent: a report of two cases. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2010;40:194-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.4.194
• ¹⁵
  Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, et al. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent. 2008;17:5-15. PMid:18332753. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059
• ¹⁶
  Langer B, Sullivan DY. Osseointegration: its impact on the interrelationship of periodondicts and restorative dentistry: Part I. Int J Periodontics. 1989;9:84-105.
• ¹⁷
  Langer B, Langer L. Overlapped flap: a surgical modification for implant fixture installation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1990;10:208‑15. PMid:2098350.
• ¹⁸
  Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses.Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1985.
• ¹⁹
  Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, Fiorellini J, Weber HP. Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20:1170‑7. PMid:19719741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x
• ²⁰
  Kim BS, Kim YK, Yun PY, Yi YJ, Lee HJ, Kim SG et al. Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:e24-8. PMid:19217009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.010
• ²¹
  Esper LA, Ferreira Junior SB, de Oliveira Fortes Kaizer R, de Almeida AL. The Role of Keratinized Mucosa in Peri-Implant Health. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49:167-70. PMid:21417779. http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/09-022
• ²²
  Gallucci GO, Grütter L, Chuang SK, Belser UC. Dimensional changes of peri-implant soft tissue over 2 years with single-implant crowns in the anterior maxilla. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:293-9. PMid:21219391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01686.x
• ²³
  Koh RU, Oh TJ, Rudek I, Neiva GF, Misch CE, Rothman ED, et al. Hard and soft tissue changes after crestal and subcrestal immediate implant placement. J Periodontol. 2011;82:1112-20. PMid:21284552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.100541
• ²⁴
  Nevins M, Mellonig JT. Implantherapy: clinical approaches and evidence of sucess. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1998.
• ²⁵
  Mareque-Bueno S. A novel surgical procedure for coronally repositioning of the buccal implant mucosa using acellular dermal matrix: a case report. J Periodontol. 2011;82:151-6. PMid:21054144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100364
• ²⁶
  Bianchi AE, Sanfilippo F. Single-tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: a 1-9-year clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:269-77. PMid:15142088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01020.x
• ²⁷
  Covani U, Marconcini S, Galassini G, Cornelini R, Santini S, Barone A. Connective tissue graft used as a biologic barrier to cover an immediate implant. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1644-9. PMid:17668986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1902/jop.2007.060461
• ²⁸
  Deppe H, Horch HH, Kolk A. Microstructured dental implants and palatal mucosal grafts in cleft patients: a retrospective analysis. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2004;32:211-5. PMid:15262250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2004.02.002
• ²⁹
  Miller PD Jr. Root coverage using a free soft tissue autograft following citric acid aplication. Part I: Technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1982;2:6-70.
• ³⁰
  Steele JG, Treasure E, Pitts NB, Morris J, Bradnock G. Total tooth loss in the United Kingdom in 1998 and implications for the future. Br Dent J. 2000;189:598-603. PMid:11132690.

Datas de Publicação

• Publicação nesta coleção
  08 Fev 2013
• Data do Fascículo
  Out 2012

Histórico

• Recebido
  16 Fev 2012
• Aceito
  27 Jun 2012