SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 Clinical comparison of short and conventional implants placed in the posterior region of the mandible. A pilot studyMicro-CT analysis of filling ability and porosity of root-end filling materials author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista de Odontologia da UNESP

On-line version ISSN 1807-2577

Rev. odontol. UNESP, ahead of print  Epub Dec 07, 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1807-2577.05117 

Articles

Factors associated with oral biofilm in ICU patients with infectious diseases

Fatores associados à presença de biofilme oral em pacientes internados na UTI

Lecidamia Cristina Leite DAMASCENAa  * 

Larycia Vicente RODRIGUESa 

Raphael Cavalcante COSTAa 

Johnys Berton Medeiros DA NÓBREGAa 

Eugênia Lívia de Andrade DANTASa 

Ana Maria Gondim VALENÇAa 

aUFPB – Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, PB, Brasil

Abstract

Introduction

Hospitalization may cause a decline in oral health and affect the entire body. The intensive care unit (ICU) may be a favorable environment for oral biofilm to accumulate in critically ill patients.

Objective

To identify factors associated with oral biofilm in ICU patients in a hospital for infectious diseases.

Method

This was a retrospective, descriptive and inferential study with a quantitative approach. Data were collected from 178 medical records of patients from January 2012 to July 2015. Biofilm presence was assessed according to the Greene and Vermillion index. Potential influential factors were analyzed by logistic regression.

Result

Among ICU patients, 69.1% were men, 60.7% had acquired immune deficiency (AIDS), 66.3% were ward patients, 50.6% were intubated, and 50.0% were sedated. The oral elements of the patients were mostly normal. The following characteristics were significantly associated with oral biofilm: changes in the lips, gums, cheeks, and palates and bleeding. Patients from the ward had a lower risk of biofilm.

Conclusion

Increased oral biofilm accumulation was observed in patients with oral changes, and patient origin was associated with the presence of biofilm.

Descriptors:  Hospital; patient; oral health; oral manifestations; biofilm

Resumo

Introdução

A hospitalização pode provocar deterioração da saúde bucal, repercutindo em todo o corpo. A UTI pode ser um ambiente favorável ao acúmulo de biofilme oral em pacientes críticos.

Objetivo

Identificar fatores associados à presença do biofilme em pacientes da UTI de um hospital de doenças infectocontagiosas.

Método

Estudo retrospectivo, descritivo e inferencial, com abordagem quantitativa. Os dados foram obtidos em prontuários de pacientes da UTI, de janeiro de 2012 a julho de 2015. O biofilme foi avaliado de acordo com o índice de Greene e Vermillion. Os fatores influentes foram analisados por regressão logística.

Resultado

Entre os pacientes da UTI, 69,1% eram homens, 60,7% pacientes com AIDS, 66,3% pacientes na enfermaria, 50,6% intubados e 50,0% sedados. Seus elementos orais eram na maioria normais. As seguintes características foram significativamente associadas a biofilmes orais: alterações orais nos lábios, gengivas, bochechas e palatos e sangramento. Pacientes da enfermaria apresentaram menor risco de apresentar biofilmes.

Conclusão

o aumento do acúmulo de biofilme oral foi observado em pacientes com alterações na boca e a procedência do paciente foi associada à presença de biofilme.

Descritores:  Hospital; paciente; saúde bucal; manifestações orais; biofilme

INTRODUCTION

The intensive care unit (ICU) is the department where critically ill patients, who require specific care, are hospitalized and treated1. The need for ICU admission stems from hemodynamic instabilities that require intensive care, including the monitoring and continuous administration of medications2. In this environment, patients have a weakened health status with a risk of death, and integrated care from the entire team is required because these patients are usually unconscious due to ventilatory support or their existing health condition.

Studies show that hospitalization causes deterioration in oral health3,4, and in the ICU environment, this situation is worsened due to the poor health status of these patients, which triggers local and systemic complications. These individuals often remain open-mouthed due to orotracheal intubation, which leads to oral mucosa dehydration. Thus, the possibility of tongue biofilm increases, favoring the production of volatile sulfur components, including mercaptans and sulfhydryls, which have an unpleasant odor4,5. Furthermore, the poor oral health status of critical patients produces signs and symptoms such as periodontitis, gingivitis, otitis, chronic nasopharyngitis and xerostomia, which enhance infection outbreaks favorable to nosocomial pneumonia4-6.

The presence of biofilm is one of the primary factors in the development of dental caries. Biofilm is an assemblage of microorganisms, including Streptococcus and Lactobacillus sp. bacteria, which are etiological agents of dental caries7. However, other pathogens are often present in biofilm and may constitute vehicles for the development of other systemic diseases. Indeed, previous studies have reported the presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli, bacteria that are responsible for hospital-acquired infections and outbreaks, in oral biofilm of intubated patients8,9.

Each cubic millimeter of dental biofilm contains approximately 100 million microorganisms (bacteria, fungi and viruses), and biofilm may serve as a pathogen reservoir. These microorganisms may diffuse into the bloodstream and/or be present in the saliva and aspirates, causing infections in other sites9.

Thus, oral health affects general health, and changes in the oral cavity of in-hospital patients, especially ICU patients, have strongly adverse effects on the entire organism. Accordingly, critical patient care must be conducted in an integral manner, effectively contributing to the control of oral biofilm and thereby minimizing systemic effects.

Knowledge of general and oral health statuses is key for developing effective therapeutic approaches, and such information is necessary for reducing the risk of a worsening clinical condition of critical patients and for promoting their general well-being.

In view of the above considerations, the aim of the present study was to identify factors related to the presence of biofilm in ICU patients in an infectious disease hospital.

METHOD

This is a retrospective, quantitative study. Records for all patients admitted to the ICU of a public infectious diseases reference hospital in the state of Paraíba from January 2012 to July 2015 were evaluated. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State Secretariat of Health (Secretaria Estadual de Saúde) under number 42727415.1.0000.5186.

Data collection was performed from May to July 2015 at the Clementino Fraga Infectious Diseases Hospital (Hospital de Doenças Infectocontagiosas Clementino Fraga), which is located in the city of João Pessoa. This center is the reference hospital for infectious diseases in the state of Paraíba; it has a six-bed ICU and a multidisciplinary team. Data of interest were collected from the ICU Dentistry Admission Form included in the patient charts. Thus, patients without oral health data were excluded from the study. Oral components were examined by dentists and hospital intensivists during routine procedures, without prior calibration.

The biofilm measurement scale used in this study was the Greene and Vermillion index. With this scale, dental surfaces are evaluated in parts and classified using scores from 0 to 3, as follows: 0, surface without dental plaque; 1, dental plaque covering less than 1/3 of the tooth surface per plaque; 2, from 1/3 to 2/3 of the tooth surface is covered by plaque; and 3, more than 2/3 of the tooth surface is covered by plaque10.

A total of 525 patients were admitted to the ICU from January 2012 to July 2015. Thirteen collected charts lacked records of oral health items, and the attending healthcare professionals explained that those patients were unable to undergo evaluation upon admission. A total of 195 charts lacked ICU Dentistry Admission forms, and the forms were incomplete in 83 charts; 56 readmissions were disregarded. Ultimately, only 178 charts were used for descriptive analysis.

Initially, independent variables were defined according to the items shown in the ICU Dentistry Admission form, which included the evaluation of the general and oral health status of each critical patient.

Univariate logistic regression was performed using R software version 3.2.1 for statistical analysis. Independent variables were categorized according to Table 1. There was a decision to standardize the presence of biofilm, which was termed outcome (Y), into the following categories: responses with scores of 2 and 3 represented the presence of biofilm (Y=1); scores of 0 (zero) and 1 (one) indicated the absence of biofilm (Y=0). It is noteworthy that only patients with teeth were included in the inferential analysis (n=158).

Table 1 Characterization according to gender, disease upon admission, origin, neurological function and ventilation mode of ICU patients with infectious diseases. João Pessoa-PB, 2015 

Variables N %
Gender
Male 123 69.1
Female 55 30.9
Disease on admission*
AIDS 108 60.7
Respiratory complication 104 58.4
Tuberculosis 66 37.1
Other diseases 42 23.6
Genitourinary complications 20 11.2
Sepsis 19 10.7
Cardiocirculatory complications 19 10.7
Diabetes mellitus 11 6.2
Hepatic complications 09 5.1
Hematologic complications 08 4.5
Leprosy 07 3.9
Cancer 06 3.4
Gastrointestinal complications 05 2.8
Metabolic complications 03 1.7
Origin
Ward 118 66.3
Walk-in clinic 26 14.6
Another hospital 21 11.8
Emergency department 06 3.4
Urgent care 04 2.2
Home 01 0.6
Surgical ward 01 0.6
Other origin 01 0.6
Neurological Function
Sedated 89 50.0
Oriented 33 18.5
Conscious 22 12.4
Disoriented 20 11.2
Lethargic 06 3.4
Agitated 03 1.7
Drowsy 03 1.7
Comatose 02 1.2
Ventilation
Orotracheal tube 90 50.6
Venturi mask 32 18.0
Spontaneous breathing 25 14.0
Nasal catheter 13 7.3
Invasive mechanical ventilation 12 6.7
Non-invasive ventilation 05 2.8
Tracheostomy 01 0.6

*Some patients had more than one disease, which explains why the sum of the disease frequencies exceeds 100%.

The odds ratios (ORs) and their respective confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to examine risk factors, with a p-value ≤ 0.05 being considered significant.

RESULT

Table 1 outlines the characterization of patients who were admitted to the ICU within the study period (n=178), showing that most patients were males (69.1%) and that most were admitted to the ICU with AIDS (60.7%). Most patients were from the ward (66.3%) and were sedated (50.0%) and intubated with an orotracheal tube as their mode of ventilation (50.6%).

Table 2 outlines the data for patient oral health status. The results showed that all patients had mouth floors that fell within the normal standards, and the lips, tongues and gums appeared normal in 56.2% (n=100), 52.8% (n=94) and 85.4% (n=152), respectively. Gingival bleeding was absent in 82% (n=146) of the patients, and 97.2% (n=173) had healthy cheeks; 98.3% (n=175) had palates without alterations. A total of 88.8% (n=157) of inpatients were toothed, and 56.2% (n=100) exhibited the presence of moderate or severe biofilm. Oral hygiene with chlorhexidine 0.12% was performed for 98.3% (n=175) of the patients.

Table 2 Oral health status of 178 ICU patients in an infectious diseases hospital in João Pessoa-PB, 2015 

Variables N %
Floor of the mouth
Normal 178 100.0
Altered 0 0.0
Lips
Normal 100 56.2
Chapped 55 30.9
Wounded 23 12.9
Tongue
Normal 94 52.8
Biofilm* 78 43.8
Wounded 06 3.4
Gums
Normal 152 85.4
Hyperplastic 18 10.1
Gingivorrhagia 07 3.9
Wounded 01 0.6
Bleeding
Presence of bleeding 32 18.0
Absence of bleeding 146 82.0
Cheek
Normal 173 97.2
Wounded 05 2.8
Palate
Normal 175 98.3
Wounded 03 1.7
Dental condition
Toothed 158 88.8
Toothless 20 11.2
Oral Hygiene
0.12% Chlorhexidine 175 98.3
Sodium bicarbonate 03 1.7

*The Greene and Vermillion index was used to assess the degree of biofilm.

Significant variables for biofilm outcome were subsequently determined, considering a p-value ≤ 0.05 for classifying their presence (Y=1) or absence (Y=0) (Tables 3 and 4). A total of 158 patients who met the inclusion criteria of this study were included in this analysis.

Table 3 Univariate analysis of non-significant (n=158) variables of interest for the “presence of biofilm” outcome in ICU patients in an infectious diseases hospital 

Variables N % P-value
Gender
Male 123 70.9 0.168
Female 55 29.1
Age (in years)
Mean 43.9 0.054
Diseases on admission
AIDS 102 60.7 0.289
Respiratory complications 93 58.9 0.927
Tuberculosis 56 35.4 0.975
Other diseases 42 26.6 0.799
Genitourinary complications 16 10.1 0.127
Sepsis 18 11.4 0.376
Cardiocirculatory complications 19 10.1 0.106
Diabetes mellitus 09 5.7 0.076
Hepatic complications 09 5.1 0.452
Hematologic complications 08 5.1 0.984
Leprosy 06 3.7 0.836
Cancer 04 2.5 0.610
Gastrointestinal complications 05 3.2 0.429
Metabolic complications 03 1.3 0.988
Origin
Ward 102 64.5 0.022*
Walk-in clinic 26 14.6
Another hospital 20 12.6
Emergency department 06 3.8
Urgent care 03 2.5
Home 01 0.6
Surgical ward 01 0.6
Other origin 01 0.6
Neurological Function 0.785
Sedated 80 50.6
Oriented 28 17.7
Conscious 18 11.4
Disoriented 19 12.0
Lethargic 04 3.2
Agitated 03 1.9
Drowsy 03 1.9
Comatose 01 0.6
Ventilation 0.086
Orotracheal tube 81 51.3
Venturi Mask 25 15.8
Spontaneous breathing 23 14.6
Nasal catheter 11 7.0
Invasive mechanical ventilation 12 7.6
Non-invasive ventilation 05 3.2
Tracheostomy 01 0.6
Floor of the mouth NA**
Normal 158 100.0
Altered 0 0.0
Lips 0.001*
Normal 85 53.8
Chapped 52 32.9
Wounded 21 13.3
Tongue
Normal 83 52.5 0.517
Biofilm 69 43.7
Wounded 06 3.8
Gums 0.014*
Normal 132 83.5
Hyperplastic 18 11.4
Gingivorrhagia 07 4.4
Wounded 01 0.6
Bleeding
Presence of bleeding 32 20.3 0.007*
Absence of bleeding 126 79.7
Cheek 0.005*
Normal 153 96.8
Wounded 05 3.2
Palate
Normal 156 98.7 0.002*
Wounded 02 1.3
Oral Hygiene 0.885
0.12% Chlorhexidine 155 98.1
Bicarbonate 03 1.9

*Significant at α=5% (p-value ≤ 0.05).

**Not applicable.

Table 4 Univariate analysis of factors associated with the presence of oral biofilm in patients who were admitted to the ICU of an infectious diseases hospital (n=158) 

Variables n % P-value ODDS 95% CI
Origin
Ward 102 64.5 0.022* 0.82 0.69; 0.97
Walk-in clinic 26 14.6
Another hospital 20 12.6
Emergency department 06 3.8
Urgent care 03 2.5
Home 01 0.6
Surgical ward 01 0.6
Other origin 01 0.6
Lips
Normal 85 53.8 0.001* 2.46 1.60; 3.77
Chapped 52 32.9
Wounded 21 13.3
Gums
Normal 132 83.5 0.014* 3.43 1.28; 9.21
Hyperplastic 18 11.4
Gingivorrhagia 07 4.4
Wounded 01 0.6
Bleeding
Presence of bleeding 32 20.3 0.007* 5.40 2.08; 14.02
Absence of bleeding 126 79.7
Cheek
Normal 153 96.8 0.005* 1.59 1.15; 2.21
Wounded 05 3.2
Palate
Normal 156 98.7 0.002* 1.64 1.19; 2.27
Wounded 02 1.3

*Significant at α=5% (p-value ≤ 0.05).

Oral changes in the lips, gums, cheeks, and palates and bleeding were associated with the occurrence of biofilm, with patients exhibiting such changes having a higher risk of biofilm occurrence. Conversely, when the variable “origin of the ICU patient” was assessed, patients from the ward showed decreased biofilm accumulation.

DISCUSSION

Hospital dentistry is regarded as a practice that is designed to care for oral changes, and it is used to assist with inpatient care. Dental surgeons support the diagnosis of oral changes and indicate coadjuvant treatments, conducting either trauma care activities or preventive, curative and restorative actions with the goal of maintaining the balance of the oral environment and increasing patient comfort11.

In the present study, most ICU patients were males with AIDS. Overall, the prevalence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is higher among the male population. Data from the 2013 Epidemiological Bulletin (Boletim Epidemiológico) indicate that the male population remains the most affected, with 445,197 infected men in Brazil12, and therefore this disease continues to be a relevant public health problem. These patients are usually already hospitalized at the institution, which is the reference hospital for treating infectious diseases. When their symptoms worsen, they are referred to the ICU, which is why most cases are derived from the ward. Studies show that HIV patients are hospitalized due to co-morbidities13,14. In fact, co-infections with hepatitis C virus are related to increased hospitalization and mortality rates. In American and Western European countries, 5-12% of ICU patients are HIV positive14.

Half of the ICU patients in this study were sedated and intubated. ICU patients commonly progress with a compromised clinical status, experiencing a decline in all systems and often requiring ventilatory support, which involves patient sedation to stabilize their health condition. The combined use of analgesics and sedatives in patients who are subjected to mechanical ventilation (MV) provides an even better adaptation to ventilation than the isolated use of sedatives due to their respiratory and cough-reflex-depressant effects as well as their hypnotic effects15.

Sedative drugs, along with analgesics, are administered to critically ill patients who are subjected to routine invasive MV16. One study reports that 39% of ICU patients require mechanical ventilatory support and that 10% of them require lengthened intubation time, and these patients are predisposed to complications related to the prolonged use of intubation and hospital stays17.

The oral health evaluation of the study patients revealed a prevalence of normal oral structures, with predominantly normal lips, tongues, gums, cheeks, mouth floors and palates (56.2%, 52.8%, 85.4%, 97.2%, 100%, and 98.3%, respectively). Other studies have reported that ICU patients have impaired oral hygiene and that hospitalization itself may compromise oral health3,4,6,18, in contrast to the findings of the present study.

The normal condition of the oral cavity in most of this study’s patients may be explained by the fact that during the data collection period, the ICU team at the Clementino Fraga Hospital included a dental surgeon who routinely performed inpatient oral hygiene using 0.12% chlorhexidine solution. The inclusion of such a healthcare professional within the hospital setting improves the oral health care of inpatients5 and may promote increased oral health quality among these individuals. Furthermore, 0.12% chlorhexidine is a compound that is used for chemical biofilm control, and it reduces oral pathogen colonization5,19.

Patient origin was associated with biofilm accumulation, and patients from the ward had a lower odds of developing biofilm. Most patients who were admitted to the ICU were from the ward (66.3%), and the Clementino Fraga Hospital includes dentistry services to provide oral healthcare to in- and outpatients. This care may have contributed to the minimization of biofilm formation.

Oral changes in the lips, gums, cheeks, and palates as well as gingival bleeding were associated with biofilm formation. Some oral problems caused by hospitalization have been reported in other studies, including bleeding and changes in the gums and saliva20,21. Furthermore, the presence of soft tissue lesions in the oral region may favor bacterial adhesion and proliferation, causing infections22 and damaging other structures. This type of condition creates an environment that is conducive to the development of biofilms.

Changes in the lips, including chapping and wounds, were found to be predisposing factors in biofilm onset. This problem may result from mouth dryness. Decreased salivary flow causes oral mucosa dehydration22 and therefore mucosal wounds; moreover, it allows for increased biofilm (a stagnant organic matrix) formation on the back of the tongue. ICU patients usually progress with a compromised clinical status, that is, changes in the immune system, exposure to invasive procedures and therapeutic dehydration (a common practice to increase respiratory and cardiac functions), thereby causing xerostomia (reduced salivary flow)7. In addition, hyposalivation may be caused by the use of some antidepressant medications, antihistamines and antihypertensives, among others22.

The prolonged use of an orotracheal tube may also cause lip dryness because the tube causes the oral cavity to be open for long periods. This open-mouth status reduces the buffering and cleaning effects of the saliva22 and may also cause mucosal lesions. A previous study showed that the presence of an orotracheal tube leads to damage in the labial mucosa, affects salivary viscosity and causes abnormalities on the back of the tongue21.

Saliva has a key role in oral balance and is involved in preventing periodontal diseases, protecting the soft and hard tissues of the mouth and regulating the pH of the oral biofilm, among other functions23. Decreased saliva production may affect soft and hard tissues by impairing their protective function and causing dental caries23, the presence of which increases the accumulation of microorganisms through mechanical retention of oral biofilm.

Oral changes, including bleeding, are caused by certain diseases, and they may lead to deficient wound healing in oral tissues and increased sensitivity to the development of oral tissue injuries5, thus affecting biofilm formation. Oral bleeding is a problem that affects ICU patients21; gingival bleeding was also found in this previous study, corroborating the results of the present research.

Biofilm formation in the oral cavity of critically ill patients may worsen their health status because a biofilm is considered a microbial reservoir that is associated with infections5. One study showed that intense biofilm accumulation occurred after 72 hours of hospitalization24. Oral bacteria may be transferred to the lower airways in patients fitted with orotracheal tubes and cause pneumonia associated with MV. This finding was reported in a study that identified the presence of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, which are potential respiratory pathogens, in oral biofilm25.

The findings of this study are based on data that were collected from a sample in a single hospital, and their generalization should be interpreted with due caution. A factor that may have contributed to the present findings was the recording of patient evaluation data only upon ICU admission, without recording or incompletely recording patient progression. The presence of incomplete inpatient charts may have affected the study by considerably decreasing the sample size and omitting data that could be relevant to the outcome. The difficulty involved in performing clinical examinations due to patient severity may also have affected the oral health evaluation.

Further studies should be conducted to help identify factors that trigger biofilm formation because these matrices may harbor microorganisms that are able to cause systemic infections, thereby worsening a patient’s condition. Knowledge about this subject has become relevant and has contributed to the development of more efficient procedures for biofilm removal. This knowledge may even prevent biofilm accumulation, thereby reducing the risk of nosocomial infection.

CONCLUSION

The overall condition and use of invasive devices in ICU patients may favor the emergence of biofilm, and biofilm accumulation was more pronounced in patients with changes in the lips, gums, cheeks, and palate and bleeding; however, individuals from the ward presented a lower risk of biofilm.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank Clementino Fraga Hospital, especially the Director Adriana Teixeira, SAME team and Rivalmi Matias.

REFERENCES

1 Kakushi LM, Évora YDM. Tempo de assistência direta e indireta de enfermagem em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Jan-Fev;22(1):1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-1169.3032.2381. [ Links ]

2 Roque KE, Tonini T, Melo ECP. Adverse events in the intensive care unit: impact on mortality and length of stay in a prospective study. Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Oct;32(10):e00081815. PMid:27783755. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00081815. [ Links ]

3 Needleman I, Hyun-Ryu J, Brealey D, Sachdev M, Moskal-Fitzpatrick D, Bercades G, et al. The impact of hospitalization on dental plaque accumulation: an observational study. J Clin Periodontol. 2012 Nov;39(11):1011-6. PMid:22957747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01939.x. [ Links ]

4 Santos PSS, Mello WR, Wakin RCS, Paschoal MAG. Uso de solução bucal com sistema enzimático em pacientes totalmente dependentes de cuidados em unidade de terapia intensiva. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2008 Jun;20(2):154-9. PMid:25307003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-507X2008000200007. [ Links ]

5 Miranda AF, Lia EN, Carvalho TM, Piau CGBC, Costa PP, Bezerra ACB. Oral health promotion in patients with chronic renal failure admitted in the Intensive Care Unit. Clin Case Rep. 2015 Nov 9;4(1):26-31. PMid: 26783430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.437. [ Links ]

6 Silva JL, O El Kadre GD, Kudo GA, Santiago JF Jr, Saraiva PP. Oral health of patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Feb;17(2):125-9. PMid:27207000. http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1814. [ Links ]

7 Sulistyani H, Fujita M, Miyakawa H, Nakazawa F. Effect of roselle calyx extract on in vitro viability and biofilm formation ability of oral pathogenic bacteria. Asian Pac J Trop Med. 2016 Feb;9(2):119-24. PMid:26919939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apjtm.2016.01.020. [ Links ]

8 Cairns S, Thomas JG, Hooper SJ, Wise MP, Frost PJ, Wilson MJ, et al. Molecular analysis of microbial communities in endotracheal tube biofilms. PLoS One. 2011 Mar;6(3):e14759. PMid:21423727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014759. [ Links ]

9 Barbosa JCS, Lobato PS, Menezes SAF, Menezes TOA, Pinheiro HHC. Perfil dos pacientes sob terapia intensiva com pneumonia nosocomial: principais agentes etiológicos. Rev Odontol UNESP. 2010;39(4):201-6. [ Links ]

10 Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The simplified oral hygiene index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964 Jan;68(1):7-13. PMid:14076341. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034. [ Links ]

11 Gomes SF, Esteves MCL. Atuação do cirurgião-dentistana UTI: um novo paradigma. Rev Bras Odontol. 2012 Jun;69(1):67-70. [ Links ]

12 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de DST, Aids e Hepatites Virais. Boletim Epidemiológico - Aids e DST. Brasília (DF): Ministério da Saúde; 2013 (Ano II, nº 1 – até semana epidemiológica 26°). [ Links ]

13 Barbier F, Roux A, Canet E, Martel-Samb P, Aegerter P, Wollf M, et al. Temporal trends in critical events complicating HIV infection: 1999-2010 multicentre cohort study in France. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1906-15. PMid:25236542. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3481-7. [ Links ]

14 Lojko P, Piechota M. Reasons for hospitalisation of HIV-infected patients in ICUs — a single-centre observational study. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47(3):200-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/AIT.2015.0032. PMid:26165237. [ Links ]

15 Silva CC, Alves MMO, El Halal MGS, Pinheiro SS, Carvalho PRA. Comparação dos níveis de sedação graduados pela escala Comfort-B e pelo índice biespectral de crianças em ventilação mecânica na unidade de terapia intensiva pediátrica. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2013 Dec;25(4):306-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20130052. PMid:24553512. [ Links ]

16 Berbigier EJ, Berbigier RJ, Moritz RD, Machado FO. Estudo comparativo da clonidina com a dexmedetomidina para a sedação do paciente crítico sob ventilação mecânica. Arq Catarin Med. 2014 Abr-Jun;43(2):44-52. [ Links ]

17 Cordeiro AL, Melo TA, Santos AM, Lopes GF. Time influence of mechanical ventilation on functional independence in patients submitted to cardiac surgery: literature review. Fisioter Mov. 2015 Dec;28(4):859-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0103-5150.028.004.AR04. [ Links ]

18 Schlesener VRF, Dalla Rosa U, Raupp SMM. O Cuidado com a Saúde Bucal de Pacientes em UTI. Cinergis. 2012 Jan-Mar;13(1):73-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.17058/cinergis.v13i1.3164. [ Links ]

19 Alotaibi AK, Alshayiqi M, Ramalingam S. Does the presence of oral care guidelines affect oral care delivery by intensive care unit nurses? A survey of Saudi intensive care unit nurses. Am J Infect Control. 2014 Aug;42(8):921-2. PMid:25087146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2014.05.019. [ Links ]

20 Hsu SP, Liao CS, Li CY, Chiou AF. The effects of different oral care protocols on mucosal change in orally intubated patients from an intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2011 Apr;20(7-8):1044-53. PMid:21044189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03515.x. [ Links ]

21 Lages VA, Moita JM No, Mello PMVC, Mendes RF, Prado RR Jr. O efeito do tempo de internação hospitalar sobre a saúde bucal. Rev Bras Pesq Saúde. 2014 Abr-Jun;16(2):30-8. https://doi.org/10.21722/rbps.v0i0.9284. [ Links ]

22 Daly C. Oral and dental effects of antidepressants. Aust Prescr. 2016 Jun;39(3):84. http://dx.doi.org/10.18773/austprescr.2016.035. PMid:27350018. [ Links ]

23 Scarabelot VL, Munerato MC, Medeiros LF, Oliveira MG, Chaves ACM, Souza A, et al. Factors associated to salivar flow alterations in dry mouth female patients. Ver Dor. 2014 Set;15(3):186-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1806-0013.20140041. [ Links ]

24 Cruz MK, Morais TMN, Trevisani DM. Avaliação clínica da cavidade bucal de pacientes internados em unidade de terapia intensiva de um hospital de emergência. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2014 Out-Dez;26(4):379-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20140058. PMid:25607267. [ Links ]

25 Sands KM, Wilson MJ, Lewis MA, Wise MP, Palmer N, Hayes AJ, et al. Respiratory pathogen colonization of dental plaque, the lower airways, and endotracheal tube biofilms during mechanical ventilation. J Crit Care. 2017 Feb;37:30-7. PMid:27621110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.07.019. [ Links ]

Received: June 28, 2017; Accepted: November 16, 2017

CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

*Lecidamia Cristina Leite Damascena, UFPB – Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Rua Inácio Ramos de Andrade, 398, apt. 301, Ed. Filipéia, Jardim Cidade Universitária, 58052-210 João Pessoa - PB, Brasil, e-mail: lecidamia@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.