Reproducibility of maximum aerobic power (VO2max) among soccer players using a modified heck protocol

Reprodutibilidade da potência aeróbia máxima (VO2max) em jogadores de futebol utilizando o protocolo de heck modificado

CLINICAL SCIENCES

Reproducibility of maximum aerobic power (VO_2max) among soccer players using a modified heck protocol

Reprodutibilidade da potência aeróbia máxima (VO_2max) em jogadores de futebol utilizando o protocolo de heck modificado

Paulo Roberto Santos-Silva; Alfredo José Fonseca; Anita Weigand de Castro; Júlia Maria D'Andréa Greve; Arnaldo José Hernandez

Laboratory for the Study of Movement, Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Brazil. E-mail: [e-mail]

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of reproducibility of maximum oxygen consumption (VO_2max) among soccer players, using a modified Heck protocol.

METHODS: 2 evaluations with an interval of 15 days between them were performed on 11 male soccer players. All the players were at a high performance level; they were training for an average of 10 hours per week, totaling 5 times a week. When they were evaluated, they were in the middle of the competitive season, playing 1 match per week. The soccer players were evaluated on an ergometric treadmill with velocity increments of 1.2 km^.h^-1 every 2 minutes and a fixed inclination of 3% during the test. VO_2max was measured directly using a breath-by-breath metabolic gas analyzer.

RESULTS: The maximum running speed and VO_2max attained in the 2 tests were, respectively: (15.6 ± 1.1 vs. 15.7 ± 1.2 km^.h^-1; [P = .78]) and (54.5 ± 3.9 vs. 55.2 ± 4.4 ml^.kg^-1.min^-1; [P = .88]). There was high and significant correlation of VO_2max between the 2 tests with a 15-day interval between them [r = 0.97; P < .001].

CONCLUSION: The modified Heck protocol was reproducible, and the 15-day interval between the ergospirometric testing was insufficient to significantly modify the soccer players' VO_2max values.

Keywords: VO_2max. Soccer players. Ergospirometric test. Functional assessment. Reproducibility.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Determinar o grau de reprodutibilidade do consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO_2max) em jogadores de futebol utilizando o protocolo de Heck modificado.

MÉTODOS: Foram avaliados por duas vezes, com intervalo de 15 dias entre os testes, 11 futebolistas masculinos. Todos eram de alto nível, treinavam em média 10 horas por semana subdivididos em treinamentos físicos, técnicos, táticos e jogos competitivos, totalizando cinco vezes por semana e na fase em que foram avaliados se encontravam em pleno período competitivo realizando um jogo por semana. Os futebolistas foram avaliados em esteira ergométrica (1,2 km^.h^-1) a cada dois minutos e inclinação fixa durante o teste em 3%. O VO_2max foi medido diretamente utilizando analisador metabólico de análise de gases expirados respiração-a-respiração.

RESULTADOS: A velocidade máxima de corrida e o VO_2max atingido nos dois testes foram respectivamente: (15,6 ± 1,1 vs. 15,7 ± 1,2 km^.h^-1; [p = 0,78]) e (54,5 ± 3,9 vs. 55,2 ± 4,4 ml^.kg^-1.min^-1; [P = 0,88]). Houve correlação significante e alta do VO_2max entre os dois testes após 15 dias de intervalo [r = 0,97; P< 0,001].

CONCLUSÃO: O protocolo de Heck modificado foi reprodutível e o intervalo de quinze dias entre os testes ergoespirométricos não foi suficiente para modificar significativamente o VO_2max dos jogadores de futebol.

Unitermos: VO_2max. Jogadores de Futebol. Teste Ergoespirométrico. Avaliação Funcional. Reprodutibilidade

INTRODUCTION

Cardiopulmonary or ergospirometric tests have been widely used for studying functional capacity levels, assessing the effects of physical training and other measurements among non-athletes and athletes in various types of sports.^1–6 The capacity to sustain exercise at varying degrees of intensity basically depends on 4 parameters: 1) the maximum oxygen consumption (VO_2max); 2) the anaerobic threshold, above which lactate accumulation occurs; 3) the efficiency of mechanical work; and 4) the oxygen kinetics time.⁷ Maximum oxygen consumption is considered to be one of the most important parameters for aerobic function and has become extremely useful for evaluating cardiorespiratory performance in health and illness.^8–13

Another important point to be considered as a prerequisite for studying the validity of any assessment procedure is the reproducibility of its measurements.¹⁴ In ergometry, various effort test protocols using treadmills and/or cycle ergometers, with different models for load increases, stage duration, and styles (ramped, stepped, or intermittent) have been used for testing VO_2max and other metabolic variables.^15–20 However, the validity and reproducibility of these protocols are not always tested.²¹ Moreover, the specialized literature has suggested that VO_2max should be repeatedly measured within a maximum duration of 8 to 12 min.^15,22–25 The protocol tested in the present study had a mean repeat interval of 16 min. However, it was not the objective of this study to investigate this controversial question. Thus, to investigate the reproducibility of VO_2max in a stepped protocol of progressive loads and fixed slope, we involved a homogenous sample of high-level soccer players.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample

Two evaluations were conducted on 11 soccer players who belonged to the junior category of a professional team in series A3, affiliated with the São Paulo Football Federation. These players were all performing at a high competitive level. The following inclusion criteria were used in this study: 1) age between 17 and 20 years and 2) mean of 10 hours of training per week, subdivided into physical, technical, and tactical training, totaling 5 times a week. At the time when they were evaluated, they were in the middle of the competitive season, with 1 match per week. Before undergoing the tests, the players were given explanations about the assessment procedures, the study objectives, and the possible benefits and risks, and they signed a consent statement in accordance with the requirements of the institution's Ethics Committee. The players' ages and biometric characteristics are described in Table 1.

Logistics of the tests

To avoid the effects of circadian variations, the soccer players underwent their 2 tests at the same time of the day.^26–28 Thus, the evaluations were carried out in the mornings, starting at 8:00 AM, and in the afternoons, starting at 1:00 PM. The tests were conducted at room temperatures ranging from 20ºC to 24ºC, relative air humidity between 45% and 65%, and barometric pressures between 698 mm Hg and 705 mm Hg. In this study, the soccer players underwent 2 ergospirometric tests with an interval of 15 days between them, and they were advised to maintain their dietary habits and training routine over this period. They were also advised to avoid high-intensity exercises during the 24 hours preceding the effort test, and not to have drinks with high caffeine or alcohol content on evaluation day. The players had a light meal 1 hour before the test and came for the test dressed in T-shirts, pants, and running shoes.

Before the ergometric evaluation, and to investigate possible electrocardiographic abnormalities an electrocardiogram (EKG) was obtained. Their heart rates were recorded at rest, during effort, and during the recovery phase by means of simultaneous monitoring of 12 derivations (D₁, D₂, D₃, AV_r, AV₁, AV_f, V₁, V₂, V₃, V₄, V₅, and V₆). These data were recorded on a computerized electrocardiograph (6.4, HeartWare, [Belo Horizonte, Brazil). To find the maximum heart rate during the test, the equation (208 – [0.7 x age]) was used.²⁹ Arterial blood pressure was measured indirectly using an aneroid sphygmomanometer (Tycos, USA) at the end of each stage of the test, by means of the auscultatory method.³⁰

Pulmonary ventilation (V_{E BTPS}), oxygen consumption (VO_{2 STPD}), carbon dioxide production (VCO_{2 STPD}) and the respiratory quotient (RQ = VCO₂/VO₂) were calculated from the measured values using a computerized gas exchange analysis system (breath-by-breath) (CPX/D, Medgraphics, Saint Paul, MN, USA). Calibration and exchange of the pneumotachograph were performed before each test, with a syringe (5530, Hans Rudolph, USA) with a capacity of 3 L, with 100 mL of dead space used as a correction factor in determining the flow and respiratory volume readings. The oxygen analyzers (zircon) and carbon dioxide analyzers (infrared) were calibrated before and immediately after performing each test, using a known gas mixture (O₂ = 11.9% and 20.9%; CO₂ = 5.09%), and were balanced with nitrogen (N₂) as well as with the atmospheric air composition itself. The ventilation variables were recorded instantaneously and then calculated for a mean time of 10 seconds.^31–32 Thus, the breath-by-breath sampling technique evaluated the quantity of oxygen (O₂) consumed, as the result of the difference between inhaled O₂ from the atmosphere and the expired quantity of O₂, and it also evaluated the carbon dioxide (CO₂) production.³³

The maximum physical capacity of the soccer players was found from an effort test on a motorized treadmill (ATL 10200, Inbramed, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil) with variable velocity (km^.h^-1) and inclination (%). A continuous stepped protocol with a fixed grade inclination of 3% was used. In this protocol, the players spent 1 minute at rest and warmed up for 3 minutes at velocities of 4.8, 6.0, and 7.2 km·h^-1 for 1 minute each. The test then began at 8.4 km·h^-1, and the velocities went on increasing with increments of 1.2 km·h^-1 every 2 minutes. The test was stopped when the player declared he was exhausted and/or if any important electrocardiographic alteration occurred (Table 2).³⁴ The active recovery phase lasted for 3 minutes, starting immediately afterwards, with decreasing velocities of 6.0, 5.0, and 4.0 km·h^-1 for 1 minute each. While both tests were in progress, the players were given continual verbal encouragement.^35–36

The subjective perception of effort was estimated in each stage by means of Borg's graduated linear scale of 15 points (6-20).^37–39 In the present study, the test was considered to have reached the maximum when the soccer players attained 2 of the following validation criteria: 1) maximum respiration exchange ratio (RER) > 1.10; 2) Borg's scale of subjective perception of tiredness > 18 and 3) maximum heart rate > 95% of the maximum chronotropic response predicted for the age.^{8, 40-42} The criterion used for ascertaining VO_2max was an increase in VO₂ less than 2.0 mLkg^-1.min^-1 for an increase of 5% to 10% in the intensity of the exercise.⁴³

Statistical Analysis

a descriptive analysis of the soccer players was undertaken by calculating means and standard deviations for the variables of age, body mass, height, and fat percentage. To compare VO_2max between tests 1 and 2, the Student t test for paired samples was used. In all analyses, the significance level accepted was P £ .05. To investigate any relationship that might exist for VO_2max between test 1 and test 2, Pearson's correlation (r) was used.⁴⁴

RESULTS

The variables of age, body mass, height, and fat percentage for the soccer players were compared across the 15-day interval between tests 1 and 2, and no statistically significant alterations were found (Table 1). The maximum running speed and maximum oxygen consumption (VO_2max) attained by the players after the 15-day period between the tests were not significantly changed (Table 3). Thus, when the VO_2max obtained in tests 1 and 2 was correlated across this time interval, the result was found to be highly reproducible and significant (r = 0.97; P < .001) (Figure 1).

DISCUSSION

Test theory establishes that the usefulness of tests depends on fulfilling quality criteria. Prominent among these is the criterion of validity, defined as the degree of exactness with which a test measures what it is intended to measure. Logic or content validity that is constructed in the relationship between the nature of the test and its evaluation capacity is the most consistent criterion for validating a procedure.⁴⁵ The present study was conducted to investigate the validity and reproducibility of VO_2max measurements using a modified Heck protocol among high-performance soccer players.

The validity of a measurement first depends on the error in the methodology used, and also on the results from the variable obtained by repeated measurements. In the present study, the correlation found between the VO_2max values after the 15-day interval between the tests was high and very significant (r = 0.97; P < .001). This correlation was within the range normally recommended for validating criteria and can be considered to be excellent.⁴⁶

In addition to this, another important point to be considered as a prerequisite for a validity study is the reproducibility of the measurements. In this study, after the 15-day interval between tests 1 and 2, there was no significant difference in the VO_2max measured (P = .88).¹⁴

From comments made by the participating soccer players themselves, another subjective characteristic observed while implementing the modified Heck protocol was the acceptability and comfort that this protocol provided for the test subjects. The individuals were able to warm up before beginning to run, and the load increments were not very aggressive (1.2 km^.h^-1). The inclination was fixed and not very great (3%), simulating the resistance of running on a grass lawn, which facilitated the movement of the soccer players on the treadmill.

As we aimed to achieve in this study, the specified duration, intensity, and progression of the stage must, insofar as possible, meet the characteristics of the activity of the individuals tested. These are matters that must be given due consideration in laboratory tests. When evaluations are not just for diagnostic or prognostic purposes but rather are for investigating performance and for advising on and evaluating performance, the type of protocol takes on great importance in relation to the result from an effort test. Traditional protocols of ergometric evaluation, such as those that Bruce, Ellestad, Balke, and others have frequently used in ergometric testing, adequately evaluate the cardiovascular response. However, in these protocols the athletes often complain about the steep inclinations of the treadmill that precipitates muscular peripheral fatigue due to less adaptation to the condition, diminishing the performance in the test. The modified Heck protocol used in our lab evaluates the cardiovascular response in the same way, but it presents an important advantage over the cited protocols, i.e., the lower inclination; consequently, the athlete does not perceive the inclination and the precocious sensation of fatigue is avoided. Saltin⁴⁷ deemed it extremely important for the needs of the test to mobilize the right muscles in an appropriate manner, considering that much of the precision is lost if the test is not carried out using the specific exercise of the sport that is practiced, or something close to it. Strangely enough, all too frequently such recommendations are ignored in the majority of laboratory tests when treadmills are used. It is important to emphasize that disregard for the coordination of the movement, the mobilization of specific muscles, the recruitment of motor units and the involvement of cellular enzyme activity have implications for the performance of any motor action. This will certainly have a negative effect on energy production and consequently on the final yield from the test.

Some studies have demonstrated the importance of taking into consideration the similarity of the activity tested and the characteristics of the protocol. Strommer et al⁴⁸ found that the VO_2max values among cross-country skiers, rowers, cyclists, and track runners were 3% to 12% higher when such individuals were tested in activities similar to their type of sport than when the same athletes were tested by means of running uphill. In a comparative study between ice-hockey players and track runners, Leger et al⁴⁹ found VO_2max values 15% higher for the ice-hockey players under real playing conditions and 8% lower when evaluated on a treadmill. Roels et al⁵⁰ compared VO_2max among swimmers and triathletes on ergometric bicycles and in a swimming pool, respectively, and found that the swimmers had greater VO_2max in the water (58.4 vs. 51.3 ml^.kg^-1.min^-1) while the triathletes obtained better results on ergometric bicycles (68.2 vs. 53.0 mL^.kg^-1.min^-1).

In the present study, we sought to adapt Heck's original protocol by decreasing the duration of each stage from 3 to 2 minutes, while the inclination went from 1% to 3%, thereby simulating the greater resistance of grass as experienced by soccer players, while the velocity increments (1.2 km^.h^-1) were maintained. Therefore, according to the population and the objectives of the functional evaluation, the type and design of the protocol applied is a strategy that must be considered in performance assessment procedures.

CONCLUSION

The modified Heck protocol was safe, effective, and reproducible, and the 15-day interval between the ergospirometric tests while maintaining the same training routine was insufficient to result in a significant change in the soccer players' VO_2max values. Therefore, to ascertain the aerobic power in this type of sport, the VO_2max values obtained via this protocol can be safely and reliably taken from a single assessment.

Received for publication on March 01, 2007

Accepted for publication on March 26, 2007

• 1. Sharma S, Elliot PM, Whyte G, Mahon N, Virdee MS, Mist B, et al. Utility of metabolic exercise testing in distinguishing hypertrophic cardiomyopathy from physiologic left ventricular hypertrophy in athletes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:864-70.
• 2. Padilla J, Martinez E, Olvera G, Ojeda Cruz P; Caudillo Perez D. Cardiopulmonary dynamics during a maximal exertion test in Mexican endurance athletes. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 2000; 70:268-84.
• 3. Corrá U, Mezzani A, Bosimini E, Giannuzzi P. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and prognosis in chronic heart failure. Chest. 2004;126:942-50.
• 4. Gocentas A, Juozulynas A, Obelenis V, Andziulis A, Landor A. Patterns of cardiovascular and ventilatory response to maximal cardiopulmonary test in elite basketball players. Medicina (Kaunas). 2005;41:698-704.
• 5. Metaxas TI, Koutlianos NA, Kouidi EJ, Deligiannis AP. Comparative study of field and laboratory tests for the evaluation of aerobic capacity in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:79-84.
• 6. Kasikcioglu E, Arslan A, Topcu B, Sayli O, Akhan H, Oflaz H, et al. Cardiac fatigue and oxygen kinetics after prolonged exercise. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108:286-8.
• 7. Whipp BJ, Davis JA, Torres F, Wasserman K. A test to determine parameters of aerobic function during exercise. J Appl Physiol. 1981;50:217-21.
• 8. Doherty M, Nobbs L, Noakes TD. Low frequency of the "plateau phenomenon" during maximal exercise in elite British athletes. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89:619-23.
• 9. Davis JA, Sorrentino KM, Ninness EM, Pham PH, Dorado S, Costello KB. Test-retest reliability for two indices of ventilatory efficiency measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing in healthy men and women. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2006;26:191-6.
• 10. Tabert JY, Metra M, Thabut G, Logeart D, Cohen-Solal A. Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise variables in chronic heart failure patients with or without beta-blocker therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2006;98:500-3.
• 11. Kruger S, Graf J, Merx MW, Stickel T, Kunz D, Koch KC, et al. The value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing and brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels in predicting the prognosis of \patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Intern Med. 2006;17:96-101.
• 12. Lin CC, Hsich WY, Chou CS, Liaw SF. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2006;150:27-34.
• 13. Guazzi M, Myers J, Arena R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the clinical and prognostic assessment of diastolic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1883-90.
• 14. Safrit MJ, Wood TM. Measurement concepts in physical education and exercise science. Champaign, Human Kinetics, 1989.
• 15. Myers J, Buchanan N, Walsh D. Comparison of the ramp versus standard exercise protocols. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:1334-42.
• 16. Zhang YY, Johnson II MC, Chow N, Wasserman K. Effect of exercise testing protocol on parameters of aerobic function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:625-30.
• 17. Lukaski HC, Bolonchuk WW, Klevay LM. Comparison of metabolic responses and oxygen cost during maximal exercise using three treadmill protocols. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1989;29:223-9.
• 18. Porszasz J, Casaburi R, Somfay A, Woodhouse LJ, Whipp BJ. A treadmill ramp protocol using simultaneous changes in speed and grade. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1596-603.
• 19. Deruelle F, Nourry C, Mucci P, Bart F, Grosbois JM, Lensel G, et al. Breathing strategy in master athletes and untrained elderly subjects according to the incremental protocol. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2006;31:202-210.
• 20. Maeder M, Wolber T, Atefy R, Gadza M, Ammann P, Myers J et al. A nomogram to select the optimal treadmill ramp protocol in subjects with high exercise capacity: validation and comparison with the Bruce protocol. J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2006;26:16-23.
• 21. Robison EM, Graham LB, Headley SA. Sprint performance: the reliability of a run to exhaustion. JEP online. 2001;4:6-9.
• 22. Myers J. Essentials of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. 1996:Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL, USA, 1996:176 pg.
• 23. Myers J, Bellin D. Ramp exercise protocols for clinical and cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Sports Med. 2000;30:23-29.
• 24. Myers J, Buchanan N, Smith D. Individualized ramp treadmill: observations on a new protocol. Chest. 1992;101:2305-415.
• 25. Myers J, Gullestad L, Vagelos R. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing and prognosis in severe heart failure: 14 mL/kg/min revisited. Am Heart J. 2000;139:78-84.
• 26. Winget CM, DeRoshia CW, Holley DC. Circadian rhythms and athletic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1985;17:498-516.
• 27. Cappaert TA. Review:time of day effect on athletic performance:an update. J Strength Condition Res. 1999;13:412-21.
• 28. Giacomoni M, Billaut F, Falgairette G. Effects of the time of day on repeated all-out cycle performance and short-term recovery patterns. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27:468-74.
• 29. Tanaka H, Monahan KD, Seals DR. Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37:153-6.
• 30. Perloff D, Grim C, Flack J, Frohlich ED, Hill M, McDonald M, et al. Human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Circulation. 1993;88:2460-70.
• 31. Silva PRS, Romano A, Yazbek Jr P. Ergoespirometria ou calorimetria indireta:um método não-invasivo de crescente valorização na avaliação cardiorrespiratória ao exercício. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 1998;4:147-58.
• 32. Silva PRS, Romano A, Teixeira AAA, Vidal JRR, Inarra LA. A importância do limiar anaeróbio e do consumo máximo de oxigênio (VO_2maxem jogadores de futebol. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 1999;5:225-32.
• 33. Yazbek Jr P, Camargo Jr PA, Kedor HH. Aspectos propedêuticos no uso da ergoespirometria. Arq Bras Cardiol. 1985;4:291-95.
• 34. Heck H, Mader A, Hess G, Mucke S, Muller R, Hollmann W. Justification of the 4 mmol/L lactate threshold. Int J Sports Med. 1985;6:117-30.
• 35. Moffatt RJ, Chitwood LF, Biggerstaff KD. The influence of verbal encouragement during assessment of maximal oxygen uptake. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1994;34:45-9.
• 36. Andreacci JL, LeMura LM, Cohen SL, Urbansky EA, Chelland SA, Duvillard SPV. The effects of frequency of encouragement on performance during maximal exercise testing. J Sports Sci. 2002;20:345-52.
• 37. Borg GAV. Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1970;2:92-6.
• 38. Noble BJ. Clinical applications of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1982;14:406-11.
• 39. Karavatas SG, Tavakol K. Concurrent validity of Borg's rating of perceived exertion in African-American young adults, employing heart rate as the standard. Journal of Allied Health Sci and Practice. 2005;3:1-8.
• 40. Howley ET, Bassett DR, Welch HG. Criteria for maximal oxygen uptake: review and commentary. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995;27:1292-301.
• 41. Duncan GE, Howley ET, Johnson BN. Applicability of VO_2max criteria: discontinuous versus continuous protocols. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997;29:273-8.
• 42. Lucía A, Rabadán M, Hoyos J, Hernández-Capilla M, Pérez M, Chicharro JL, et al. Frequency of the VO_2max plateau phenomenon in world-class cyclists. Int J Sports Med. 2006;27:1-9.
• 43. Shephard RJ. Frontiers of fitness. Springfield: Charles C Thomas; 1971.
• 44. Berquó ES, Souza JMP, Gotlieb SLD. Bioestatística. E.P.U Editora Pedagógica Universitária Ltda. São Paulo 1Ş. Edição, 1981:299-300.
• 45. Safrit MJ. Evaluation in physical education. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1983.
• 46. Mathews DK. Medida e avaliação em educação física. Rio de Janeiro, Ed. Guanabara/Interamericana, 1980;21-23.
• 47. Saltin B. Capacitá aeróbica ed anaeróbica. Revista di Cultura Sportiva. 1987;6:2-11.
• 48. Stromme SB, Ingjer F, Meen HD. Assessment of maximal aerobic power in specifically trained athletes. J Appl Physiol. 1977;42:833-37.
• 49. Leger L, Seliger V, Brassard L. Comparison among VO_2max values for hockey players and runners. Can J Appl Sports Sci. 1979;4:18-21.
• 50. Roels B, Schmitt L, Libicz S, Bentley D, Richalet JP, Millet G. Specificity of VO_2max and the ventilatory threshold in free swimming and cycle ergometry: comparison between triathletes and swimmers. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:965-8.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  05 Sept 2007
• Date of issue
  2007

History

• Received
  01 Mar 2007
• Accepted
  26 Mar 2007