SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue7Ultrasonographic findings in patients examined in cataract detection-andtreatment campaigns: a retrospective studyPsychological stress and recurrent aphthous stomatitis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Clinics

Print version ISSN 1807-5932On-line version ISSN 1980-5322

Clinics vol.64 no.7 São Paulo  2009

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000700006 

CLINICAL SCIENCE

 

Prostasin, a potential tumor marker in ovarian cancer- a pilot study

 

 

Fernanda Pires CostaI; Eraldo Luis Batista JuniorII; Alice ZelmanowiczIII; Christer SvedmanIV; Gabriela DevenzV; Silvana AlvesV; Andrea Simões Martins da SilvaIV; Bernardo GaricocheaI

IOncology Unit, Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
IICenter of Research in Molecular and Functional Biology, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
IIIPrevention Cancer Center, Hospital Santa Casa - Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil
IVDepartment of Oncology, Karolinska University Hospital - Stockholm, Sweden
VBiomedical Research Institute, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre/RS, Brazil. Email: fernanda.costa@yahoo.se Tel: 55 53 3227.9070

 

 


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is generally diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease; therefore, poor prognoses are typical. The development of tumor markers is thus of utmost importance. Prostasin is a protease that in normal tissues is highly expressed only in the prostate gland and seminal fluid. A previous study showed that prostasin is highly overexpressed in ovarian cancer cell lines. This study sought to evaluate the expression of prostasin in ovarian cancer.
METHODS: Fresh tumor samples of ovarian epithelial cancer (n: 12) were analyzed for expression of prostasin mRNA (messenger ribonucleic acid) by conventional and real time quantitative PCR (polymerase chain reaction). As a standard control, a normal prostate sample was analyzed.
RESULTS: Using conventional PCR, prostasin was detected in all but one sample. Using quantitative PCR, prostasin was over-expressed in all but one of the samples as compared to the control (prostate).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that prostasin is overexpressed in many epithelial ovarian cancers. Further studies of prostasin as a potential biomarker for this disease are warranted.

Keywords: Biomarker; Screening; Diagnostic; PRSS8; Detection.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Ovarian cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in women worldwide, and in many parts of the world ovarian cancer is the most common cause of gynecological cancer-related mortality.1,2

The dismal prognosis associated with ovarian cancer is mainly due to the fact that the majority of patients are diagnosed in the advanced stages of the disease. In earlier stages, the 5-year overall survival rate is around 90%, whereas in more advanced stages it is below 30%.3 There is thus a need for early detection strategies in order to increase the number of patients who can be diagnosed during the curable stages of the disease.

At present, tumor markers for early ovarian cancer with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for screening are not available.4-6 However, during the last few years, several promising candidate proteins have been identified.7-10 Although many proteins, alone or in combination, show promise as potential tumor markers, much work remains in order to validate such findings. Prostasin has been demonstrated to be overexpressed in ovarian cancer cell lines and has been detected in the serum of ovarian cancer patients at levels significantly higher than that of normal controls.11 In this study, we investigated the expression of prostasin mRNA in ovarian cancer in order to further corroborate these findings and to generate more data on prostasin as a potential biomarker in ovarian cancer.

 

METHODS

From September 2003 to September 2005, fresh tumor samples were collected from 30 patients undergoing abdominal surgery for ovarian tumor diagnosis and treatment in the following hospitals located in Porto Alegre, Brazil: Hospital São Lucas, Hospital Fêmina and Hospital Conceição. Eligibility criteria included no previous cancer diagnosis or treatment. All patients signed informed consent before the surgery. This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of each hospital mentioned above.

The specimens were collected during the surgical procedures for ovarian resection or biopsy and stored at -70 ºC. Samples from benign cysts and non-epithelial ovarian cancers were not used. Normal prostatic tissue was used as a control and as a physiological reference for prostasin expression. The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of the local ethics and scientific committees and the Helsinki Declaration.

Reverse Transcription - Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

Total RNA was extracted using TRIZOL® reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

The cDNA was generated by using SuperScript II Rnase H-reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The total mixture contained RNA, oligo dT, MgCl2, enzyme buffer, dithiothreitol, dideoxynucleotides, SuperScript II and RNAse inhibitor (RNase Out TM Ribonuclease Inhibitor; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). One tube containing RNA, dideoxynucleotides and oligo dT was initially incubated at 65ºC for 5 minutes in a thermocycler (iCycler, BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) and placed on ice for one minute. After that, the reverse transcription reaction components cited above were added and incubated at 42ºC for 50 minutes. The mixture was heated at 70ºC for 15 minutes and denatured in ice for 1 minute. Finally, RNAse H was added to the mixture, which was incubated at 37ºC for 20 minutes. The cDNA was stored at -20ºC.

The RT-PCR reaction was performed by using primer sets specific for prostasin (forward primer: 5´-ACTTGAGCCACTCCTTCCTTCAG-3´; reverse primer: 5´-CTGATGGTCCCAAAAAGCACAC-3´) 11 and the housekeeping gene ß-globin (forward primer: 5`-GAAGAGCCAAGGACAGGTAC-3`; reverse primer 5`-CAACTTCATCCACTGTCACC-3` (268 base pair). The total mixture for the PCR contained 2.5 µl of cDNA, 10 pmol of each primer, 200 pmol of dideoxynucleosides, 1.5 mM of MgCl2 , 10X enzyme buffer, 2 U of Taq Polymerase and deionized water. PCR amplification in an automatic thermocycler (MJ Research PT150CA, USA) was performed with 31 cycles at 96ºC for 1 minute, 60ºC for 1 minute and 72ºC for 10 minutes. A mixture without DNA was used as a negative control to rule out contamination, and the amplification result was verified using 3.5% agarose gel electrophoresis and an ultraviolet transilluminator (201 Macrovue Transluminator LKB, Bromma, Sweden).

Real-Time RT-PCR

To evaluate the relative expression of the prostasin gene in the tumor samples, the quantitative RT-PCR technique was performed. Reverse transcription of the total RNA was carried out with random hexamers, reverse transcriptase, MgCl2, and dideoxynucleotides. For real-time assessment of prostasin gene expression, Taqman chemistry was employed; an amplification reaction mix was generated that contained Taq enzyme buffer, dideoxynucleotides, Hot-Start Taq DNA polymerase (AmpliTaq, Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) and MgCl2, according to the manufacturer´s instructions. Fifty nanograms of cDNA was added to this mixture in addition to the specific human prostasin or β-actin primers/probes assembled in separate wells (Assays-on-Demand®, Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA). The probes were labeled either with FAM or VIC fluorophores. The cDNAs were than amplified by denaturation for 10 minutes at 95ºC, followed by 50 two-step cycles of denaturation at 95ºC for 15 seconds and annealing-extension at 60ºC for 60 seconds. The PCR efficiency was examined by serially diluting the template cDNA (100 ng, 50 ng, 25 ng, 12.5 ng and 0 ng). The Ct values and concentrations of the serial dilutions were plotted, and linear regression analysis was used to obtain the determination coefficient (r2) of the reaction; the latter should be at least 98% to enable relative expression analysis using the ΔΔCt Method. Each cDNA was amplified in triplicate, and a no-RT mRNA sample was included in every plate for background correction.12 For each test sample, prostasin and β-actin were amplified in parallel. ß-actin was used to normalize the quantity of RNA and to adjust the efficiency of the RT reaction. The changes in fluorescence for every cycle were monitored in a thermocycler (ABI7500, Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA), and the relative expression was calculated as described by Livak et al.13 The relative amount of PCR product generated from each primer/probe set was determined on the basis of the CT value. The CT value was then subtracted from that of each target gene to obtain a ΔCT value. The difference between the ΔCT values of the samples for the target gene and the CT value of a calibrator (prostate) was determined. The relative quantitative value was expressed as 2-ΔΔCT. Therefore, the prostasin expression for each sample was presented as the fold change relative to the calibrator tissue, in this case prostate.

 

RESULTS

Patient characteristics

In total, 30 patients were screened, and 12 were included. Among the 18 excluded samples, 10 were benign cysts, 3 were non-epithelial ovarian cancers (thecoma, metastatic melanoma and Krukenberg tumor) and the quality of the RNA in 5 of the samples was not sufficient for analysis. Of the 12 patients included, 90% had advanced disease (clinical stage III and IV). The mean age was 61.2 years (29-83).

RT-PCR

Positive RT-PCR results for prostasin were obtained in 11 of the 12 samples.

Real-time RT-PCR. Efficiency and validation calculation

As explained above, the PCR efficiency was examined by serial dilution by a factor of 2. In this case, a difference of 1 amplification cycle (CT ) should be observed. This was exactly the result we obtained, generating determination coefficients of 0.9902 and 0.9985.

Real-time RT-PCR

The prostate gland is the human tissue with the highest prostasin expression. Therefore, prostate tissue was used as a control and as a physiological reference. All but one of the epithelial samples showed a significant relative increase in prostasin expression. The highest level was 3.30-fold, higher and the mean was about 2-fold higher than the control.

 

DISCUSSION

Prostasin was first identified in 1994 when Yu et al. isolated it from seminal fluid and demonstrated localization in epithelial cells and the ducts of the prostate using radioimmunoassay and immunohistochemical techniques.14

Prostasin is a 40-kDa trypsin-like proteinase.14 The catalytic triad that is essential for the enzymatic activity of prostasin is a histidine, aspartic acid, and serine sequence. The sequences around the active sites of serine proteinases are highly conserved.15

Although the biological and physiological roles of prostasin are not known at present, the high levels of prostasin in the prostate and seminal fluid (over 20-fold higher than any other tissue examined) suggest it may play an important physiological role in these locations. Other data also show that prostasin is present at low levels in other tissues, such as the lung, kidney, liver, bronchi, colon and salivary glands, indicating that it may have roles in other biological processes as well.14 In normal ovarian tissue, prostasin is not highly expressed.11,15

Prostasin's role in cancer is unclear, but there is evidence indicating that it may be related to tumor promoter mechanisms,16 as well as tumor suppressor mechanisms.17-19 Recently, other data has also shown that prostasin is involved in proteolytic cleavage of the extracellular domain of EGFR (epithelial growth factor receptor), causing a constitutively phosphorylated receptor20 that could potentially participate in fueling tumor growth.

Prostasin was first studied as a potential marker for prostate cancer by Laribi et al. They found that all 86 of their blood samples from normal controls failed to amplify prostasin PCR products, whereas blood samples from 35 of 96 (36%) prostate cancer patients were positive. Of the metastatic patients, 63% (17/27) were positive, but only 26% (18/69) of patients with local tumors were positive.20

The potential use of prostasin as a marker of ovarian cancer has been suggested in a study demonstrating that prostasin mRNA expression ranged from 120- to 410-fold higher in ovarian cancer cell lines than normal ovarian cell lines. The abnormal expression of prostasin in these cell lines was further confirmed at the protein level by immunostaining. Since the expression of prostasin was so markedly different between normal and malignant ovarian cells, the serum prostasin levels were investigated in patients with and without ovarian cancer. The prostasin levels were higher in the serum of ovarian cancer patients than in controls. Moreover, the serum prostasin levels were significantly reduced after surgery in the vast majority of the cases studied.11

Our study is the first to perform quantification of mRNA prostasin expression in fresh-frozen ovarian cancer tissue samples. The data corroborate that prostasin is overexpressed in many ovarian cancers and that expression is significantly higher in malignant than normal tissue (control). Thus, further studies exploring the use of prostasin as a potential biomarker in ovarian cancer are warranted.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) for supporting this experiment.

 

REFERENCES

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, Samuels A, Tiwari RC, Ghafoor A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2005. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:10-30.         [ Links ]

2. Pascalicchio JC, Fristachi CE, Castanho PL, Kue CM, Piato S, Baracat FF. Epidemiologia do câncer de ovário no Brasil. RSBC. 2000;11:46-53.         [ Links ]

3. Ries LAG, Melbert D, Krapcho M, Stinchcomb DG, Howlader N, Horner MJ, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2008.         [ Links ]

4. Meyer T, Rustin GJ. Role of tumour markers in monitoring epithelial ovarian cancer. Br J Cancer. 2000;82:1535-8.         [ Links ]

5. Bast RC Jr, Xu FJ, Yu YH, Barnhill S, Zhang Z, Mills GB. CA 125: the past and the future. Int J Biol Marker. 1998;13:179-87.         [ Links ]

6. Bast RC Jr, Badgwell D, Lu Z, Marquez R, Rosen D, Liu J. New tumor markers: CA125 and beyond. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(Suppl 3):274-81.         [ Links ]

7. Gagnon A, Ye B. Discovery and application of protein biomarkers for ovarian cancer. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2008;20:9-13.         [ Links ]

8. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, Steinberg SM. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2002;359:572-7.         [ Links ]

9. Zhang Z, Yu Y, Xu F, Berchuck A, van Haaften-Day C, Havrilesky LJ. Combining multiple serum tumor markers improves detection of stage I epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:526-31.         [ Links ]

10. Skates SJ, Horick N, Yu Y, Xu FJ, Berchuck A, Havrilesky LJ. Preoperative sensitivity and specificity for early-stage ovarian cancer when combining cancer antigen CA-125II, CA 15-3, CA 72-4, and macrophage colony-stimulating factor using mixtures of multivariate normal distributions. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4059-66.         [ Links ]

11. Mok SC, Chao J, Skates S, Wong K, Yiu GK, Muto MG. Prostasin, a potential serum marker for ovarian cancer: identification through microarray technology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1458-64.         [ Links ]

12. Li M, Li W, Kim HJ, Yao Q, Chen C, Fisher WE. Characterization of somatostatin receptor expression in human pancreatic cancer using real-time RT-PCR. J Surg Res. 2004;119:130-7.         [ Links ]

13. Livak, KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25:402-8.         [ Links ]

14. Yu JX, Chao L, Chao J. Prostasin is a novel human serine proteinase from seminal fluid. Purification, tissue distribution, and localization in prostate gland. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:18843-8.         [ Links ]

15. Yu JX, Chao L, Chao J. Molecular cloning, tissue-specific expression, and cellular localization of human prostasin mRNA. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:13483-9.         [ Links ]

16. Yu XJ, Chao L, Ward DC, Chao J. Structure and chromossomal localization of the human prostasin (PRSS8) gene. Genomics. 1996;32:334-40.         [ Links ]

17. Chen LM, Hodge GB, Guarda LA, Welch JL, Greenberg NM, Chai KX. Down-regulation of prostasin serine protease: a potential invasion suppressor in prostate cancer. Prostate. 2001;48:93-103.         [ Links ]

18. Takahashi S,Suzuki S, Inaguma S, Ikeda Y,Cho YM, Hayashi N. Down-regulated expression of prostasin in high-grade or hormone-refractory human prostate cancers. Prostate. 2003;54:187-93.         [ Links ]

19. Chen LM, Chai KX. Prostasin serine protease inhibits breast cancer invasiveness and is transcriptionally regulated by promoter DNA methylation. Int J Cancer. 2002;97:323-9.         [ Links ]

20. Chen M, Chen LM, Lin CY, Chai KX. The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is proteolytically modified by the Matriptase-Prostasin serine protease cascade in cultured epithelial cells. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1783:896-903.         [ Links ]

21. Laribi A, Berteau P, Gala J, Eschwège P, Benoit G, Tombal B. Blood-borne RT-PCR assay for prostasin-specific transcripts to identify circulating prostate cells in cancer patients. Eur Urol. 2001;39:65-71.         [ Links ]

 

 

Received for publication on February 16, 2009
Accepted for publication on April 13, 2009

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License