Print version ISSN 1807-5932
Clinics vol.65 no.6 São Paulo 2010
Norepinephrine remains increased in the six-minute walking test after heart transplantation
Guilherme Veiga GuimarãesI, II; Veridiana D' AvilaII; Edimar Alcides BocchiI; Vitor Oliveira CarvalhoI
ILaboratório de Insuficiência Cardíaca e Transplante, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (InCor HC-FMUSP) - São Paulo/SP, Brazil. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org. Tel: 55 11 3069-5419
IILaboratório de Atividade Física e Saúde, Centro de Práticas Esportivas, Universidade de São Paulo - São Paulo/SP, Brazil
OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the neurohormonal activity in heart transplant recipients and compare it with that in heart failure patients and healthy subjects during rest and just after a 6-minute walking test.
INTRODUCTION: Despite the improvements in quality of life and survival provided by heart transplantation, the neurohormonal profile is poorly described.
METHODS: Twenty heart transplantation (18 men, 49±11 years and 8.5±3.3 years after transplantation), 11 heart failure (8 men, 43±10 years), and 7 healthy subjects (5 men 39±8 years) were included in this study. Blood samples were collected immediately before and during the last minute of the exercise.
RESULTS: During rest, patients' norepinephrine plasma level (659±225 pg/mL) was higher in heart transplant recipients (463±167 pg/mL) and heathy subjects (512±132), p<0.05. Heart transplant recipient's norepinephrine plasma level was not different than that of healthy subjects. Just after the 6-minute walking test, the heart transplant recipient's norepinephrine plasma level (1248±692 pg/mL) was not different from that of heart failure patients (1174±653 pg/mL). Both these groups had a higher level than healthy subjects had (545±95 pg/mL), p<0.05.
CONCLUSION: Neurohormonal activity remains increased after the 6-minute walking test after heart transplantation.
Keyword: Heart transplantation; Heart failure; Exercise; Norepinephrine; Cardiac rehabilitation; 6-minute walking test.
Heart failure is considered the last stage of heart disease and a significant cause of worldwide mortality and morbidity.1,2,3 The end-stage of heart failure, which is marked by a lack of response to medical treatment, disabling symptoms, and repeated hospital stays, is associated with high morbidity and mortality.4 Heart transplantation is an acceptable gold standard treatment for select patients in the terminal stages.5
The exacerbated neurohormonal activity plays an important role in disease progression and prognosis in heart failure.6,7,8,9 This neurohormonal axis has become one of the biggest targets in heart failure interventions.10,11,12,13,14,15 It is well known that beta-blockers provide survival improvement and, because of this, have become one of the main drugs for treating heart failure.16
Despite the significant improvement in quality of life and survival provided by heart transplantation, the neurohormonal profile is not restored to normal values.6 The mechanisms involved and the neurohormonal profile after heart transplantation have been poorly described, especially during the 6-minute walking tests that could represent the effort relative to daily activities.17
The aim of this study was to evaluate the neurohormonal activity in heart transplant recipients and compare it with that in heart failure and healthy subjects during rest and just after the 6-minute walking test.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 20 sedentary heart transplant recipients (18 men, 49±11 years), 11 sedentary heart failure patients (8 men, 43±10 years), and 7 sedentary healthy subjects (5 men 39±8 years) were included in this study. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 1. All heart transplant recipients were in a clinically stable condition 8.5±3.3 years after transplantation. Endomyocardial biopsy did not show any evidence of tissue rejection during the entire study. Heart transplant recipients and heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation, a pacemaker, and noncardiovascular functional limitations like osteoarthritis were excluded from this study. Heart failure patients whose drug therapy was not optimized were also excluded from this study. Optimization was considered 50 mg/day or more of carvedilol for at least 3 months.18 Healthy subjects did not have any risk factors for cardiovascular disease or noncardiovascular functional limitations.
This protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Heart Institute, InCor HCFMUSP. All patients provided informed consent prior to participation.
Six-minute walking test and blood norepinephrine
All patients were asked to refrain from both strenuous physical activity and the consumption of any stimulants (eg, coffee, tobacco, alcohol) 24 hours prior to the 6CWT. The patients' last meal was ingested at least 2 hours before the start of the test. Before starting the 6CWT and blood sample collection, the patients rested for 15 minutes on a chair. The 6CWT using the Borg scale was performed on a treadmill with zero inclination and patient-controlled speed in a temperature-controlled room (21-23°C) in the afternoon (between 13:00 hours and 15:00 hours). All patients were advised to keep walking during the test at a pace between "relatively easy and slightly tiring" (between 11 and 13 on the Borg scale). The distance walked was recorded by the treadmill microprocessor (Series 2000, Marquette Electronics, Milwaukee, WI, USA). Encouragement was standardized with phrases like "if you can walk faster, increase the speed", "you are doing very well," and "if it is tiring, you can reduce the speed." Blood pressure was measured at rest and at the sixth minute by the auscultation method. The electrocardiography (Max 1, Marquette Electronics), ventilatory and gas exchange variables were continuously evaluated breath-by-breath by a computerized system (Vmax 229 model, SensorMedics, Yorba Linda, CA, USA) during the entire test but only collected at rest (stand position) and just after the 6-minute walking test. The 6-minute walking test has been shown to reflect submaximal effort in heart failure patients19 and to reproduce the daily activities.20 Blood samples were collected immediately before the 6-minute walking test with patients in the upright position and just after the exercise by the antecubital vein. The norepinephrine assay was performed as previously reported.21
Current medication intake
All heart failure patients were receiving carvedilol associated with an ACE inhibitor or losartan. Medication profile is shown in Table 1. Patients took carvedilol, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, losartan, and Isosorbide 5-mononitrate twice per day, one half of the daily dose in the morning (9:00 A.M.) and the other half at night (9:00 P.M.). Diuretics, digoxin, and spironolactone were taken in the morning (9:00 A.M.). All heart transplant recipients were receiving immunosuppressive therapy two times per day, one half of the daily dose in the morning and the other half at night. Antihypertensive drugs were normally taken in the morning.
The descriptive analysis is presented as the mean and standard deviation. To compare the norepinephrine levels between the 3 groups, we used the ANOVA with the post-hoc Tukey test.
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for Windows, 11.5 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
During rest, norepinephrine plasma level was higher in heart transplant recipients and healthy subjects. Heart transplant recipients' norepinephrine plasma level was not different than that of healthy subjects. Just after the 6-minute walking test, heart transplant recipients' norepinephrine plasma level was not different than that of heart failure patients and both these groups had a higher level of norepinephrine than did healthy subjects. Exercise capacity and hemodynamic data are listed in table 2.
The main finding of this study is that norepinephrine remained increased just after the 6-minute walking test in heart transplant recipients. This is the first report of the norepinephrine profile during a 6-minute walking test in heart transplant recipients.
It is known that daily activities are not performed at maximal effort. That it's why we studied the neurohormonal profile in a 6-minute walking test. This way, we could access the norepinephrine in a more functional status.
The intensity of the 6-minute walking test, between 11 and 13 on the Borg scale, was similar for all groups, which are expected to spend about the same metabolic or VO2, regardless of physical status. The same distance covered by the groups could be explained by their sedentary characteristic. Moreover, they were all clinically stable outpatients with optimized medication.22
Pérez-Villa et al6 studied the neurohormonal profile of 37 heart failure patients on the waiting list for heart transplantation before and 1, 4, 9, and 12 months after heart transplantation. The authors concluded that the neurohormonal activation did not normalize after heart transplantation. In this study, plasma norepinephrine level was only recorded before and 1 month after heart transplantation, showing a tendency to decrease. In our study, the heart failure group had a higher level of resting norepinephrine compared with heart transplant recipients and healthy subjects. The norepinephrine level of the heart transplant recipients did not differ from that of healthy subjects, probably by the partial reinnervation that occurred during the 8.5 years. Heart function after transplantation depends on the circulating norepinephrines. The progressive heart reinnervation through the years could have progressively decreased the necessity for norepinephrine plasma levels in heart transplant recipients.
The study by Ferretti et al8 evaluated the neurohormonal profile of 17 heart transplant recipients and 9 healthy subjects at rest and at maximal exercise. The resting norepinephrine plasma level was higher in heart transplant recipients than in healthy subjects. In our study, the resting norepinephrine did not differ between heart transplant recipients and healthy subjects. The time of heart transplantation, ie, different stages of reinnervation, between our heart transplant recipients and the ones in the study by Ferretti et al was different (8.5 versus 3.4 years). This difference could explain these divergent results. During exercise, the norepinephrine plasma level was also higher in heart transplant recipients compared with that in healthy subjects. This is in accordance with our results, despite the fact that our heart transplant recipients had performed a 6-minute walking test.
This study was limited by the study design (cross-sectional), small study population, and the use of a single method of neurohormonal evaluation.
The norepinephrine remained increased just after the 6-minute walking test in heart transplant recipients. The consequences of these data should be better investigated in heart transplant recipients.
1. Working Group on Cardiac Rehabilitation & Exercise Physiology and Working Group on Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for exercise testing in chronic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:37-45. [ Links ]
2. Bocchi EA, Carvalho VO, Guimaraes GV. Inverse correlation between testosterone and ventricle ejection fraction, hemodynamics and exercise capacity in heart failure patients with erectile dysfunction. Int Braz J Urol. 2008;34:302-310. [ Links ]
3. Carvalho VO, Guimarães GV, Carrara D, Bacal F, Bocchi EA. Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Arq Bras Cardiol 2009;93 :39-44. [ Links ]
4. Guimaraes GV, D'Avila MV, Silva MS, Ciolac EG, Carvalho VO, Bocchi EA. A cutoff point for peak oxygen consumption in the prognosis of heart failure patients with beta-blocker therapy, Int J Cardiol 2009, doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.05.001 [ Links ]
5. Morgan JA, John R, Weinberg AD, Remoli R, Kherani AR, Vigilance DW et al. Long-term results of cardiac transplantation in patients 65 years of age and older: a comparative analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:1982-1987. [ Links ]
6. Pérez-Villa F, Roig E, Ferrer E, Cuppoletti A, Llancaqueo M, Jiménez W, et al. Neurohormonal activation in congestive heart failure: does it normalize after heart transplantation? Rev Esp Cardiol. 2004;57:725-731. [ Links ]
7. Isnard R, Pousset F, Trochu J, Chafirovskaïa O, Carayon A, Golmard J, et al. Prognostic value of neurohormonal activation and cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86:417-421. [ Links ]
8. Ferretti G, Marconi C, Achilli G, Caspani E, Fiocchi R, Mamprin F, et al. The heart rate response to exercise and circulating catecholamines in heart transplant recipients. Pflugers Arch. 2002;443:370-376. [ Links ]
9. Carvalho VO, Ciolac EG, Guimarães GV, Bocchi EA. Effect of exercise training on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in heart failure patients. Congest Heart Fail. 2009;15: 176-80. [ Links ]
10. Carvalho VO, Ruiz MA, Bocchi EA, Carvalho VO, Guimarães GV. Correlation between CD34+ and exercise capacity, functional class, quality of life and norepinephrine in heart failure patients. Cardiol J. 2009;16:426-31. [ Links ]
11. Carvalho VO, Guimarães GV, Ciolac EG, Bocchi EA. Heart rate dynamics during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test in optimized beta-blocked heart failure patients. Clinics. 2008 ;63:479-482. [ Links ]
12. Carvalho VO, Rodrigues Alves RX, Bocchi EA, Guimarães GV. Heart rate dynamic during an exercise test in heart failure patients with different sensibilities of the carvedilol therapy: heart rate dynamic during exercise test. Int J Cardiol. 2010;142:101-4. [ Links ]
13. Carvalho VO, Guimarães GV, Bocchi EA. The relationship between heart rate reserve and oxygen uptake reserve in heart failure patients on optimized and non-optmized beta-blocker therapy. Clinics 2008;63:725-730. [ Links ]
14. Carvalho VO, Pascoalino LN, Bocchi EA, Ferreira SA, Guimarães GV. Heart rate dynamics in heart transplantation patients during a treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise test: A pilot study. Cardiol J. 2009;16:254-258. [ Links ]
15. Carvalho VO, Bocchi EA, Guimarães GV. Hydrotherapy in heart failure: a case report. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64:824-6. [ Links ]
16. Lainscak M, Moullet C, Schön N, Tendera M. Treatment of chronic heart failure with carvedilol in daily practice: the SATELLITE survey experience. Int J Cardiol 2007;122:149-155. [ Links ]
17. Carvalho VO, Bocchi EA, Pascoalino LN, Guimarães GV. The relationship between heart rate and oxygen consumption in heart transplant recipients during a cardiopulmonary exercise test Heart rate dynamic during exercise test. Int J Cardiol. 2009, doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.07.035 [ Links ]
18. Packer M, Coats A, Fowler M, Katus H, Krum H, Mohacsi P et al. Effect of Carvedilol on Survival in Severe Chronic Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2001 31;344:1651-1658. [ Links ]
19. Carvalho VO, Bocchi EA, Guimarães GV. The Borg scale as an important tool of self-monitoring and self-regulation of exercise prescription in heart failure patients during hydrotherapy. A randomized blinded controlled trial. Circ J. 2009;73:1871-6. [ Links ]
20. Guimarães GV, Carvalho VO, Bocchi EA. Reproducibility of the self-controlled six-minute walking test in heart failure patients. Clinics 2008;63:201-206. [ Links ]
21. Bouloux P, Perrett D, Besser GM. Methodological considerations in the determination of plasma Catecholamines by highperformance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Ann Clin Biochem 1985;22:194-203. [ Links ]
22. Wasserman K, Hansen JE, Sue DY, et al. Principles of exercise testing and interpretation. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger, 1994. [ Links ]
Received for publication on January 09, 2010
First review completed on February 17, 2010
Accepted for publication on March 16, 2010