Print version ISSN 1807-5932
Clinics vol.67 supl.1 São Paulo 2012
Wouter W. de Herder
Department of Internal Medicine, Sector of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
Familial GH-secreting tumors are seen in association with three separate hereditary clinical syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, Carney complex, and familial isolated pituitary adenomas.
Keywords: Acromegaly; Gigantism; Pituitary; History; Hereditary.
In 1886, Dr Pierre Marie used the term "acromegaly" for the first time and described the full clinical characteristics of this condition (1). However, twenty-two years prior in 1864, Dr. Andrea Verga had already named the same disorder "prosopo-ectasia" [widening of the face] (2). At the postmortem examination of an acromegalic woman (with "prosopo-ectasia"), he found a walnut-sized sellar tumor and displacement of the optic nerves (2). A normal pituitary gland was not found. He wondered whether the normal pituitary gland had disappeared because of pressure from the tumor or whether the tumor itself was a degeneration of the gland (2). Also, Dr. V. Brigidi described in 1877 a case report that included findings obtained at the autopsy of the acromegalic Italian actor Ghirlenzoni (3). Dr. V. Brigidi had diagnosed this condition as "rheumatitis deformans" and made the significant observation of a hypertrophied pituitary gland on the first microscopic examination of a pituitary tumor (3). In 1887, Dr. Oskar Minkowski reported that pituitary enlargement is found in all postmortem studies on patients with acromegaly (4). In 1892, Dr. Roberto Massalongo was able to correlate acromegaly with increased pituitary function by demonstrating that a pituitary tumor taken from a patient with acromegaly contained specific granulated cells (5). At the end of the 19th century, the relationship between pituitary hyperfunctionhypertrophy (or a hyperfunctioning pituitary tumor) and acromegaly was clearly established and confirmed by many investigators (6-12). Dr. Henri Henrot had already published in 1877 an autopsy report of a patient with gigantism, in whom a 4.5 x 3.0 cm tumor was found in the position of the pituitary body (13,14).
Initially, it was believed that acromegaly and gigantism were two totally different diseases. Dr. Pierre Marie (15-21), his intern Dr. J.D. Souza-Leite (22) and Dr. Georges Guinon (23) were convinced that acromegaly and gigantism were two entirely different disorders. Gigantism was considered an exaggerated variant of normal development, whereas acromegaly was considered as a pathological condition. However, in 1884, Drs. Christian F. Fritsche and Theodor Albrecht Edwin Klebs (24), supported by the work of Dr. Karl Langer (1872) (25), concluded that in contrast to gigantism, which they considered a congenital disorder, acromegaly is an acquired variety of gigantism that occurs at a later age after growth is completed. In 1894, Dr. M. Sternberg concluded that there are many similarities between acromegaly and gigantism (26). However, in 1897 he changed his view and agreed with Dr. Pierre Marie and others that both disorders have different origins (27). In 1891, Dr. D.J. Cunningham, after studying the skeleton of the Irish giant Cornelius Magrath (1736-1760; height: 2.26 m [7 ft, 5 in]), pointed out the connection between acromegaly and gigantism (28-30). In 1893, Dr. Charles Dana (31) and Dr. Woods Hutchinson (32) described the case report and postmortem studies of the French giantess Emma Aline Bataillard (also known as Lady Aama, 1877-1895; height: 2.03 m [6 ft, 8 in]) and reached the same conclusion. After studying the acromegalic giant Jean-Pierre Mazas (18471901; height: 2.30 m [7 ft, 6½ in]), the so-called "giant of Montastruc" (Monastruc, Haute-Garonne, France) in 1895, Drs. Edouard Brissaud and Henry Meige also concluded that acromegaly and gigantism can coexist in the same person (33,34).
It gradually became evident that acromegaly and gigantism have the same pathogenetic mechanism, but differ regarding the age of onset. Gigantism occurs much earlier in life when the skeleton still has the potential to grow, a developmental phase now known as "prepubertal" (33-35). Finally, the cause of acromegaly and gigantism - the overproduction of pituitary growth hormone - became known in the early years of the 20th century (36).
Familial acromegaly and familial gigantism are extremely rare. The earliest report of familial gigantism may be that of Goliath, described in in the Bible, where it is stated that his father and three brothers were also giants. The first description of familial acromegaly in the medical literature is most likely a report by Fraenkel that was published in 1901 (37,38). The Ugo brothers, or Hugo brothers, also known in France as "les Grants des Alpes" ("the Giants of the Alps") (Figure 1), were two famous giants who traveled the world and appeared at fairs and circuses at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. Battista Ugo (in French: Baptiste Hugo, 1876-1916) attained a height of 2.30 m (7 ft, 7 in) and Paolo Antonio Ugo (in French: Antoine Hugo, 1887-1914) attained a height of 2.25 m (7 ft, 5 in) (39-41). Their parents, three brothers and two sisters were of average size. The postmortem examination of Baptiste Hugo was performed and published by Dr. D. Symmers at the William Parker Hospital in New York. The report describes a pituitary adenoma measuring 5 x 2.5 x 2.3 cm (2 x 1 x 0.9 in) and weighing 5.94 g with suprasellar expansion that compressed both optic nerves. Left parasellar and retrosellar expansion were also found.
In his famous monograph, "The Pituitary Body and its Disorders", published in 1912, Dr. Harvey Cushing (42) hinted at "Mendelian tendencies" in two patients with familial gigantism (case XIII, surgical No. 27784, pp. 8-92; case XXXI, surgical No. 27011K, pp. 158-162) (42).
Since these initial reports, several authors have reported the coincidence of acromegaly and gigantism in first-degree relatives (43-55).
Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenomas have an annual incidence of about 3 per 1,000,000 and a prevalence of about 60 per 1,000,000. The likelihood of multiple GH-secreting tumors presenting among first-degree relatives within a single family is, therefore, statistically very uncommon, and their occurrence has prompted many researchers to consider this an inheritable disorder (56).
Familial GH-secreting tumors are seen in association with three separate hereditary clinical syndromes: (1) multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), (2) Carney complex (CNC), and (3) familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA).
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)
Autosomal-dominant MEN1 syndrome is associated with a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on chromosome locus 11q13 (57). The MEN1 gene tumor suppressor gene encodes a 610-amino acid protein known as menin. More than 550 mutations of the MEN1 gene have been identified. Pituitary tumors occur in approximately 30-50% of patients with MEN1 (58), but the frequency of GH-producing pituitary tumors in MEN1 patients is only about 10% (59).
Carney complex (CNC)
Pituitary adenomas occur in 10-20% of patients with the autosomal-dominant CNC, and these are invariably GH-secreting tumors (60).
CNC is associated with a LOH on chromosomal locus 17q22-24. Germline mutations in the protein kinase A (PKA) regulatory subunit 1 (PRKAR1A) gene have been identified (61). Loss of function of this regulatory subunit results in constitutive activation of PKA that increases signaling through a pathway that enhances proliferation of the GH-producing cells in the pituitary.
Familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA)
Inactivating germline mutations in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor that interacts with tumor suppressor protein (AIP) can be found in 40-50% of families that have a case of acromegaly occurring along with FIPA (62-66). To date, about 50 different AIP mutations have been identified.
AIP mutation-positive acromegaly or gigantism is generally diagnosed 10 years earlier than sporadic acromegaly. GH-producing tumors in AIP-positive patients (mostly males) more frequently display extrasellar growth, exhibit more aggressive characteristics, and have a tendency for higher accelerated growth than sporadic tumors. These tumors are also more frequently associated with onset in childhood and adolescence, thus presenting more frequently with gigantism (67,68). Furthermore, AIP mutation-positive GH-producing tumors appear to be less responsive to medical therapy with somatostatin analogs and dopamine agonists.
In 2010, Chahal and co-workers extracted DNA from a tooth of the Irish giant, Charles Byrne (1761-1783; 2.31 m, [7 ft 7 in]), and identified a germline mutation in the AIP gene. Four contemporary Northern Irish families who presented with gigantism, acromegaly, or prolactinoma have the same mutation and haplotype associated with the mutated gene. Using coalescent theory, they came to the conclusion that these persons share a common ancestor who lived about 57-66 generations earlier (69).
Familial acromegaly and gigantism only account for a very tiny proportion of all pituitary adenomas and can be related to MEN 1 and CNC syndromes as well as to mutations in the AIP gene. AIP mutations are very common in gigantism.
1. Marie P. Sur deux cas d'acromégalie: hypertrophie singulière non congénitale des extrémités superieures, inférieures et céphalique. Rev Méd Liege. 1886;6:297-333. [ Links ]
2. Verga A. Caso singolare de prosopectasia. Reale Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere Bendiconti Classe di Scienze Matematiche e Naturali. 1864;1:111-17. [ Links ]
3. Brigidi V. Studii anatomopatologica sopra un uomo divenuto stranamente deforme per chronica infirmita. 1877. Societe medico-fisica Fiorentina. [ Links ]
4. Minkowski O. Über einem Fall von Akromegalie. Berliner Klin Wochensch. 1887;21:371-4. [ Links ]
5. Massolongo R. Hyperfonction de la glande pituitaire et acromégalie: gigantisme et acromegalie. Rev Neurol. 1895;3:225. [ Links ]
6. Tamburini A. Beitrag zur Pathogenese der Akromegalie. Zentralblatt für Nervenheilkunde und Psychiatrie. 1894;17:625. [ Links ]
7. Hutchinson W. The pituitary gland as a factor in acromegaly and giantism. New York Med J. 1898;67:341-4. [ Links ]
8. Hutchinson W. The pituitary gland as a factor in acromegaly and giantism. New York Med J. 1898;67:450-3. [ Links ]
9. Hutchinson W. The pituitary gland as a factor in acromegaly and giantism. New York Med J. 1898;72:89-100. [ Links ]
10. Hutchinson W. The pituitary gland as a factor in acromegaly and giantism. New York Med J. 1898;72:133. [ Links ]
11. Benda C. Die microscopischen Befunde bei vier Fallen von Akromegalie. Dtsch Med Wochensch. 1901;27:537-64. [ Links ]
12. Benda C. Beiträge zur normalen und pathologischen Histologie der menschlichen Hypophysis cerebri. Berliner Klin Wochensch. 1900;1205-10 [ Links ]
13. Henrot H. Notes de clinique médicale: des lésions anatomiques et de la nature du myxoedeeme. Reims. 1882:112-22. [ Links ]
14. Henrot H. Hypertrophie générale progressive: notes de clinique médicale. 1877;Reims:56. [ Links ]
15. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpétrière. 1888;I:173. [ Links ]
16. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpetrière. 1888;I:229. [ Links ]
17. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpetrière. 1889;II:327. [ Links ]
18. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpetrière. 1889;II:139. [ Links ]
19. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpetrière. 1889;II:188. [ Links ]
20. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpetrière. 1889;II:45. [ Links ]
21. Marie P. L'acromégalie. Nouvelle Iconographie de la Salpétrière. 1889;II:224. [ Links ]
22. Souza-Leite JD. De l'acromegalie, maladie de Marie. Paris, 1890. [ Links ]
23. Guinon G. De l'acromegalie. Gazette Hopitaux Paris. 1889;62:1161. [ Links ]
24. Fritsche CF, Klebs TAE. Ein Beitrage zur Pathologie des Riesenwuchses. Klinische und pathologisch anatomische Untersuchungen. Leipzig.: Vogel FCW,1884. [ Links ]
25. Langer K. Ueber Wachstum des menschlichen Skelets, mit Bezug auf den Riesen. Denkschr der Kais Akad der Wissensch zu Wien Math -naturw. 1872;Kl.31. [ Links ]
26. Sternberg M. Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Akromegalie. Z Klin Med. 1894;27:86. [ Links ]
27. Sternberg M. Die Akromegalie. In: Nothnagel CWH, editor. Nothnagel's Encyclopedia. Vienna; 1897. [ Links ]
28. Cunningham DJ. The skeleton of the Irish Giant Cornelius Magrath. Trans Royal Irish Acad. 1891;29:553. [ Links ]
30. Cunningham DJ. The Skull and Some of the Other Bones of the Skeleton of Cornelius Magrath, the Irish Giant. The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. 1892;21:40-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2842207. [ Links ]
31. Dana C. On acromegaly and gigantism, with unilateral facial hypertrophy. J Nerv Mental Dis. 1893;18(11):725-738, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005053-189311000-00001. [ Links ]
33. Brissaud E, Meige H. Gigantisme et acromegalie. Journal de medicine et de chirurgie pratiques. 1895;66:49. [ Links ]
34. Launois P-E, Roy P. Etudes Biologiques sur les Geants. Paris: Masson et Cie. 1904. [ Links ]
37. Fraenkel A, Stadelmann E, Benda C. Klinische und anatomische Beitrage zur Lehre von der Akromegalie1. I. (Aus der ersten medizinischen Abtheilung.) A. Fraenkel: Zwei Falle von Akromegalie. 1 Vortrage, gehalten im Verein für innere Medizin am 1. und 29. April 1901. Dtsch Med Wochensch. 1901;27(31):513-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-00291186994. [ Links ]
38. Fraenkel A, Stadelmann E, Benda C. Klinische und anatomische Beitrage zur Lehre von der Akromegalie. II. (Aus der II. medizinischen Abtheilung.) E. Stadelmann: Zwei Falle von Akromegalie. Dtsch Med Wochensch. 1901;27(32):536-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-00291187005. [ Links ]
39. Orengo N. Figura Gigante. Torino, Italy: Giulio Einaudi editore s.p.a., 1992. [ Links ]
40. Marechal O. La Biographie, les Voyages et la vie des Geants Hugo les plus Grands sur terre. Comptes rendus des Facultés de Medecine. 1908. Choisy-Le-Roi, Imprimeries Reunies de Choisy-Le-Roi. [ Links ]
41. Symmers D. Acromegalic Giantism. Interstate Med J. 1917;24:1013-5. [ Links ]
42. Cushing H. The pituitary body and its disorders: clinical states produced by disorders of the hypophysis cerebri. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott; 1912. [ Links ]
44. Koch G, Tiwisina T. Beitrag zur Erblichkeit der Akromegalie und der Hyperostosis generalisata mit Pachydermie. Arztl Forsch. 1959;13:489-504. [ Links ]
45. Levin SR, Hofeldt FD, Becker N, Wilson CB, Seymour R, Forsham PH. Hypersomatotropism and acanthosis nigricans in two brothers. Arch Intern Med. 1974;134(2):365-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1974.00320200175026. [ Links ]
46. Kurisaka M, Takei Y, Tsubokawa T, Moriyasu N. Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma in uniovular twin brothers: case report. Neurosurgery. 1981;8(2):226-30, http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198102000-00014. [ Links ]
47. Jones MK, Evans PJ, Jones IR, Thomas JP. Familial acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1984;20(3):355-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1984.tb00092.x. [ Links ]
49. McCarthy MI, Noonan K, Wass JA, Monson JP. Familial acromegaly: studies in three families. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1990;32(6):719-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1990.tb00918.x. [ Links ]
50. Tamburrano G, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Grossi A, Lise A, Bulletta C. L'acromegalie familiale: a propos d'une observation. Revue de la litterature. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 1992;53:201-7. [ Links ]
51. Matsuno A, Teramoto A, Yamada S, Kitanaka S, Tanaka T, Sanno N et al. Gigantism in sibling unrelated to multiple endocrine neoplasia: case report. Neurosurgery. 1994;35(5):952-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199411000-00023. [ Links ]
52. Benlian P, Giraud S, Lahlou N, Roger M, Blin C, Holler C, et al. Familial acromegaly: a specific clinical entity--further evidence from the genetic study of a three-generation family. Eur J Endocrinol. 1995;133(4):451-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1330451. [ Links ]
53. Stock JL, Warth MR, Teh BT, Coderre JA, Overdorf JH, Baumann G, et al. A kindred with a variant of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 demonstrating frequent expression of pituitary tumors but not linked to the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 locus at chromosome region 11q13. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(2):486-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.82.2.486. [ Links ]
54. Verloes A, Stevenaert A, Teh BT, Petrossians P, Beckers A. Familial acromegaly: case report and review of the literature. Pituitary 1999;1(34):273-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009958510378. [ Links ]
57. Larsson C, Skogseid B, Oberg K, Nakamura Y, Nordenskjold M. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene maps to chromosome 11 and is lost in insulinoma. Nature. 1988;332(3):85-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/332085a0. [ Links ]
58. Teh BT, Kytola S, Farnebo F, Hoog A, Kytola S, Korpi-Hyovalti E, et al. Mutation analysis of the MEN1 gene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, familial acromegaly and familial isolated hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83(8):2621-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.83.8.2621. [ Links ]
59. Verges B, Boureille F, Goudet P, Murat A, Beckers A, Sassolas G, et al. Pituitary disease in MEN type 1 (MEN1): data from the France-Belgium MEN1 multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(2):457-65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.87.2.457. [ Links ]
60. Pack SD, Kirschner LS, Pak E, Zhuang Z, Carney JA, Stratakis CA. Genetic and histologic studies of somatomammotropic pituitary tumors in patients with the "complex of spotty skin pigmentation, myxomas, endocrine overactivity and schwannomas" (Carney complex). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(10):3860-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.10.3860. [ Links ]
61. Kirschner LS, Carney JA, Pack SD, Taymans SE, Giatzakis C, Cho YS, et al. Mutations of the gene encoding the protein kinase A type I-alpha regulatory subunit in patients with the Carney complex. Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):89-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/79238. [ Links ]
63. Daly AF, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A. The epidemiology and genetics of pituitary adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23(5):543-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.008. [ Links ]
64. Chahal HS, Chapple JP, Frohman LA, Grossman AB, Korbonits M. Clinical, genetic and molecular characterization of patients with familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21(7):419-27, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2010.02.007. [ Links ]
65. Pinho LK, Vieira NL, Wildemberg LE, Moraes AB, Takiya CM, Frohman LA, et al. Familial isolated pituitary adenomas experience at a single center: clinical importance of AIP mutation screening. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2010;54(8):698-704, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27302010000800006. [ Links ]
67. Daly AF, Tichomirowa MA, Petrossians P, Heliovaara E, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Barlier A, et al. Clinical characteristics and therapeutic responses in patients with germ-line AIP mutations and pituitary adenomas: an international collaborative study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(11):E373-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-2556. [ Links ]
68. Tichomirowa MA, Barlier A, Daly AF, Jaffrain-Rea ML, Ronchi CL, Yaneva M, et al. High prevalence of AIP gene mutations following focused screening in young patients with sporadic pituitary macroadenomas. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165(4):509-15, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-0304. [ Links ]
69. Chahal HS, Stals K, Unterlander M, Balding DJ, Thomas MG, Kumar AV, et al. AIP mutation in pituitary adenomas in the 18th century and today. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(1):43-50, http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008020. [ Links ]
No potential conflict of interest was reported.
Tel.: 31 10 7035950