Variable clinical expression in patients with a germline MEN1 disease gene mutation: clues to a genotype-phenotype correlation

REVIEW

Variable clinical expression in patients with a germline MEN1 disease gene mutation: clues to a genotype-phenotype correlation

Cornelis J. Lips^I; Koen M. Dreijerink^I; Jo W. Höppener^II

^IUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Internal Medicine & Endocrinology, Utrecht, The Netherlands

^IIUniversity Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Metabolic & Endocrine Diseases, Utrecht, The Netherlands

ABSTRACT

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is an inherited endocrine tumor syndrome, predominantly characterized by tumors of the parathyroid glands, gastroenteropancreatic tumors, pituitary adenomas, adrenal adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus, lungs or stomach. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 is caused by germline mutations of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 tumor suppressor gene. The initial germline mutation, loss of the wild-type allele, and modifying genetic and possibly epigenetic and environmental events eventually result in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 tumors. Our understanding of the function of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 gene product, menin, has increased significantly over the years. However, to date, no clear genotype-phenotype correlation has been established. In this review we discuss reports on exceptional clinical presentations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, which may provide more insight into the pathogenesis of this disorder and offer clues for a possible genotype-phenotype correlation.

Keywords: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1; MEN1; Menin; Genotype-Phenotype Correlation; Clinical Expression.

INTRODUCTION

"It is an old experience that through her errors, Nature often grants us unexpected insights into her secrets which are otherwise a closed domain", William Harvey, 1657.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an inherited endocrine tumor syndrome, characterized predominantly by tumors of the parathyroid glands, gastroenteropancreatic tumors, pituitary adenomas, adrenal adenomas, and neuroendocrine tumors of the thymus, lungs or stomach. MEN1 is caused by germline mutations of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene. It appears that in the MEN1 syndrome, clinical expression differs between families. This may be the result of the specific MEN1 gene mutation in a family (genotype-phenotype correlation). As a rule, the development of a tumor depends on a series of genetic events (multistep tumorigenesis). Thus, additional co-segregating modifying factors such as germline mutations in other genes are likely to play a role in the interfamilial variability of MEN 1. Moreover, clinical expression can also vary between individual members of the same family, possibly because of additional genetic or epigenetic factors. To date, a clear correlation between genetic events and the variable clinical expression of MEN1 has not been established (1-5). Further understanding of the genetic aspects of MEN1 and the pathogenesis of MEN1- related tumors could enable more tailored clinical screening and treatment strategies.

In this review, we discuss recent reports on aberrant clinical expression of MEN1, which may allow us a glimpse into the pathogenesis of this intriguing disorder.

In 1903, Erdheim described the case of an acromegalic patient with a pituitary adenoma and three enlarged parathyroid glands. Fifty years later, Underdahl et al. reported eight patients with a syndrome of pituitary-, parathyroid-, and pancreatic islet adenomas. In 1954, Wermer found that the syndrome was transmitted as a dominant trait (6). In 1968, Steiner et al. introduced the term "multiple endocrine neoplasia" (MEN) to describe disorders featuring combinations of endocrine tumors; they designated the Wermer syndrome as MEN1 and the Sipple syndrome as MEN2. Gorlin subdivided type 2 into A and B. Then, in 1975, Khairi (7) suggested that type 2B be called type 3; however, this was not generally accepted. More recently, in 2006, families with multiple endocrine tumors but without MEN1 or RET (MEN2) gene mutations were identified (8). This related syndrome is referred to as MEN4.

DISCOVERY OF THE MEN1 GENE

In positional cloning, gene mapping precedes, and eventually leads to, gene identification. The first step is mapping the gene to a specific chromosomal region by linkage analysis. The second step is identifying the correct gene among all possible candidate genes within that particular chromosomal region. After the gene has been identified, it is possible to study its (patho)physiologic function.

In 1996, two groups independently identified the MEN1 gene on chromosome 11q13 (9,10). To date, more than 1336 different MEN1 gene mutations (both germline and sporadic) have been reported in the literature (4). Most of these mutations are clearly inactivating, in accordance with the notion that the MEN1 gene is a tumor suppressor gene. There are no mutational hot spots in the MEN1 gene.

FUNCTION OF THE MEN1-GENE PRODUCT

The MEN1 gene product, menin, functions as an adaptor protein that is involved in interactions with multiple protein partners. Men1 null mutant mice have indicated that menin is essential for viability (11). Menin is involved in neuroendocrine cell development and function. Later on, it is active in many cellular processes, including gene transcription regulation, DNA replication, DNA repair, and signal transduction.

Menin target genes that are important for development and proliferation, including homeobox domain (HOX) genes, the CDKN2C and CDKN1B cyclin-dependent kinase inhibiting genes, the human telomerase (hTERT) gene, and nuclear receptor target genes (12-15).

As a transcriptional co-regulator, menin may function as a co-activator or co-repressor by recruiting histone-modifying enzymatic activity (12,15,16). As a co-activator, menin is involved in the regulation of histone methylation by recruiting the mixed-lineage leukaemia (MLL) proteins MLL1 and MLL2 (12,17). In this way, menin can bind to nuclear receptors and activate nuclear receptor-mediated gene transcription (12,15). By tethering histone deacetylase activity to genes, menin can serve as a repressor of transcription (18).

In order to understand the role of menin as a tumor suppressor protein and as a co-factor of MLL fusion proteins, the structural basis had to be revealed. Recently, the crystal structure of menin in Nematostella vectensis was reported (19). Knowledge about the three-dimensional structure may elucidate the interactions essential to the function of menin. It appears that the Leucine, Leucine, Tryptophan, Leucine, Leucine (LLWLL) amino acids nuclear receptor interaction motif of menin is well-conserved and is located in an alpha-helix. In general, modeling gene mutations into this structure will be helpful in determining the effects on protein function. Inactivation of the MEN1 gene results in predisposition to tumor formation (see Figure 1, Table 1).

ABERRANT CLINICAL EXPRESSION OF MEN1

A MEN1 gene mutation may be completely detrimental to gene function. It may also result in a protein product with some residual function. An aberrant menin protein may be impaired in its function by several mechanisms: menin can interact with many different proteins. Possibly, germline mutations in the MEN1 gene selectively affect menin binding to its partners, leading to distinct phenotypes.

The type of missense mutation (e.g. replacement of arginine with glycine) may have a differential effect on the function of menin (38): in-frame or missense mutations differ from frameshift/nonsense mutations (39), whereas missense and in-frame mutations may affect the interactions of a menin domain with transcription factors such as JunD, Smad3 and NFkappaB and nuclear receptors (1), or impair sensitization to apoptosis from caspase-3, p53 or p21 (40). A MEN1 gene missense mutation may result in protein instability, and enhanced and early proteolytic degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway (41).

It was generally assumed that, in contrast to MEN2, in MEN1 there is no clear genotype-phenotype correlation (1,3-5). However, several reports challenge this assumption.

Familial aberrant expression

1. MEN1 Burin. Four large kindreds from the Burin peninsula/Fortune Bay area of Newfoundland with prominent features of prolactinomas, in addition to carcinoids, and parathyroid tumors (referred to as MEN1Burin) have been described, and they show linkage to 11q13, the same locus as that of MEN1. Haplotype analysis with 16 polymorphic markers now reveals that representative affected individuals from all four families share a common haplotype over a 2.5 Mb region. A nonsense mutation in the MEN1 gene has been found to be responsible for the disease in the affected members in all four of the MEN1-Burin families. This suggests that either a common ancestral mutation in the MEN1-Burin gene or a modifying gene on 11q13 is responsible for this prolactinoma variant of MEN1 (42-45).

2. Familiar isolated hyperparathyroidism and MEN1 gene missense mutations. Familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism (FIHP) is an autosomal dominant disorder that can represent an early stage of either MEN1 caused by an allelic variant of the MEN1 gene, or of hyperparathyroidismjaw tumor (HPT-JT) syndromes; alternatively, the condition can be caused by an allelic variant of the hyperparathyroidism 2 (HRPT2) gene, or caused by a mutation at another locus. Interestingly, the major proportion of MEN1 gene germline mutations that have been found in FIHP are seemingly mild missense mutations or in-frame deletions (46-55). In MEN1, roughly 80% of patients harbor nonsense mutations.

3. Predominant mutations in MEN1 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Schaaf performed mutation analysis of the MEN1 gene in tumors from 306 patients with MEN1, and found that patients with gastroenteropancreatic tumors more often had truncating mutations, very probably leading to completely inactivated menin (56).

4. Mild/late onset versus malignant phenotypes. To date, several disease-related MEN1 gene intron mutations have been reported. These intron mutations may affect mRNA splicing and cause mild phenotypes, with late, and relatively low, penetrance of the disease (57-59). However, clinical expression at a young age may occur. This may be explained by interpatient variations in gene transcription and translation of the MEN1 gene.

Two recent case reports described families with a high penetrance of malignant neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas (60,61). Both these families carried germline mutations that completely abolish menin function.

The earliest manifestation of MEN1 was a pituitary adenoma in a 5-year-old boy who had a missense mutation leading to a H139D substitution in the MEN1 protein (62). Functional analysis of the mutant protein revealed severely reduced protein stability (41), reduced binding to JunD (16), reduced binding to the estrogen receptor alpha and absent histone-methylation recruiting capacity. Thus, functional analysis of this potentially mild missense MEN1 gene mutation shows that the protein product is, in fact, completely inactivated.

5. Metabolic effects of aberrant expression of the MEN1 gene. In MEN1 disease-gene carriers, all vitamin D receptors (VDRs) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)-γ are expressed but are probably less activated because of impaired menin function.

A. PPARγ2 is a transcription factor that plays a key role in adipocyte differentiation. Polymorphisms in this gene may contribute to the variability in body mass index and insulin sensitivity in the general population. PPARγ is the receptor for the thiazolidinediones, which act as PPARγ agonists and lower the blood glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus by increasing insulin sensitivity. Individuals with dominant-negative PPARγ gene mutations manifest a syndrome that combines lipodystrophy with features of the metabolic syndrome, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, hepatic steatosis, dyslipidemia, hypertension and (in women) polycystic ovary syndrome. In patients with MEN1, decreased activation of PPAR may result in insulin resistance and weight gain (63).

B. Vitamin D receptors (VDRs) are found in a large number of tissues beyond the classic target tissues gut, bone and kidney. These tissues include endocrine glands such as pituitary, parathyroid glands, pancreatic islets, etc.

Lourenco et al. discussed the increased bone loss pattern found in patients with MEN1 compared with that of patients with sporadic primary HPT (64). Besides increased bone loss, resistance to vitamin D may be associated with insulin resistance and beta cell dysfunction, leading to increased risk for type 2 diabetes in patients with MEN1 (65,66).

Effect of gender

The prevalence and probability of pancreatic tumors among patients with MEN1 were higher in males than in females. This difference was due to the differential occurrence of gastrinomas. The prevalence and probability of developing pituitary adenomas were significantly greater in females. Thymic tumors are found nearly exclusively in male MEN1 patients (67).

The difference in clinical expression between the genders may be explained by the difference in transcription regulation of estrogen and androgen receptors. Menin can act as a co-activator of nuclear hormone receptors including estrogen (ERα) and possibly androgen (AR) receptors. A defect in the MEN1 gene, together with gender-specific differences in concentrations of the hormones involved and tissue-specific distribution of their receptors, may contribute to the observed gender-specific differences in prevalence of prolactinoma and gastrinoma.

Additional genetic effects

1. Loss of heterozygosity; the AIP gene. In accordance with the tumor suppressor function of menin, MEN1-associated tumors exhibit loss of the wild-type allele. This second hit occurs as a somatic mutation and often involves deletion of a larger chromosomal region containing multiple genes [loss of heterozygosity (LOH)].

The gene encoding the aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) is located on 11q13, in the vicinity of the MEN1 gene. Recently, it was found that inactivating mutations in the AIP gene are the underlying cause of low-penetrance pituitary adenoma predisposition. The finding of a truncated gene and LOH indicates that AIP acts as a tumor suppressor gene (68,69). In northern Finland, AIP-germline mutations accounted for 16% of cases of acromegaly in young patients. The tumor suppressor genes AIP and MEN1 are located 3 Mb apart. Concomitant deletions of these genes may underlie predisposition to MEN1 and pituitary adenoma. To what extent deletion of the AIP gene is present in MEN1 tumors has yet to be established. Inactivation of this gene in animal models may reveal a potential causative role in MEN1-associated tumors.

2. Genetic predisposition for other diseases. Genetic predisposition for other diseases may contribute to enhancement of tumor formation in patients with MEN1 (70). For instance, normally the vitamin D receptor on parathyroid cells inhibits production and release of parathyroid hormone (PTH). In families with inactivating mutations in the gene encoding VDR, this is associated with end-organ resistance to calcitriol.

In the parathyroid glands of patients with MEN1, there exists a decreased activation of the VDR. An additional defect in the VDR or calcium receptor may contribute to hyperactivity, hyperplasia, and adenoma (71).

3. Additional, somatic mutations involved in acceleration of tumor growth.

3a). Data from other familial neuroendocrine tumor syndromes. How can we identify acquired mutations that are responsible for acceleration of tumor growth in MEN1? Clues for modifier genes may be found in other familial neuroendocrine tumor syndromes such as MEN2 and MEN4 (the latter is also referred to as MENX). Which are their traditional pathogenetic pathways and are these involved in aberrant clinical MEN1 expression? Overlap between MEN1 and MEN2 and additional genetic events have to be explored (e.g. p18/p27 knock-out mice develop both MEN1- and MEN2-associated tumors) (72,73).

Phenotypic overlap between MEN1- and MEN2-like syndromes was identified in the rat and named MENX. The syndrome is caused by a germline inactivating mutation in the CDKN1B gene encoding p27^Kip1 (8). p27^Kip1 has a key role in cell cycle regulation and is involved in differentiation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.

Subsequently, germline mutations in the CDKN1B gene were identified in the germline of a MEN1-like family. In these patients, germline mutations of the MEN1 gene could not be detected (8). However, only the menin-coding region and splice junctions were analyzed. The patients were also negative for RET gene mutations (MEN2). Mutations in CDKN1B and related genes, but without MEN1 gene mutations, are a rare cause of MEN1-like phenotype (7476). As a consequence of mutations in the p27 gene, a novel human MEN syndrome was recognized and named MEN4.

In mice, the Cdkn2c gene encoding p18^Ink4c was shown to collaborate with menin in suppression of neuroendocrine tumor development (77). Whether occurrence of somatic mutations in p18^Ink4c and/or p27^Kip1 accelerates tumor growth in human MEN1 tumors has yet to be established. In transgenic MEN2 mice and human patients with MEN2, inactivating mutations in p18 will promote tumor growth (72,73,78,79). Reduced expression of CDKN1B, but not CDKN2C, has been observed in parathyroid adenomas from patients with MEN1.

3b). Clues from sporadic parathyroid adenomas, pituitary tumors, and pancreatic NETs

i) Sporadic Parathyroid adenoma. A high rate of somatic MEN1 gene mutations is seen in sporadic parathyroid adenomas. There exists an interaction between menin and the transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta/Smad signaling pathway. In vitro experimentation has demonstrated that the presence of menin is required for TGF-beta to effectively inhibit parathyroid cell proliferation and PTH production (80).

ii) Pituitary tumors. The pituitary tumor transforming gene (PTTG; securin) was the first transforming gene found to be highly expressed in pituitary tumor cells, and seems to play an important role in the process of oncogenesis. Cell signaling abnormalities have been identified in pituitary tumors, but their genetic basis is unknown. Both Raf/mitogen activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and phosphoinositide 3-kinase(PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathways are over-expressed and/or over-activated in pituitary tumors (81). These pathways share a common root, including initial activation by a tyrosine kinase receptor.

Pit-1 is a direct transcriptional target of VDR. Recruitment of histone deacetylase 1 is involved in the repressive effect of VDR on Pit-1 expression (82).

There is a critical role for the growth factor activin in regulating inhibition of pituitary cell growth and Pit-1/PRL expression through the Smads and menin (83). Alterations in the activin/TGF-beta downstream signaling pathways may be critical steps towards tumor formation and progression (84). To date, the occurrence of additional TGF-beta, Pit-1, PTTG, or VDR mutations in MEN1-associated tumors has not been published.

iii) Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. In nonfamilial pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) the most commonly mutated genes specify proteins implicated in chromatin remodeling: 44% of the tumors had somatic inactivating mutations in MEN1. Clinically, mutations in the MEN1 gene were associated with better prognosis. Also, mutations in genes in the mTOR pathway were found in 14% of the tumors, a finding that could potentially be used to stratify patients for treatment with mTOR inhibitors (85).

Loss of menin expression is associated with over-expression of the Raf/MEK/ERK and P13K/AKT/mTOR pathways in pancreatic tumors (34). Intact menin has an essential role in WNT/ β-catenin signaling, and inhibits mouse pancreatic islet tumor proliferation (26). Menin regulates subcellular localization of b-catenin via nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling. Loss of menin leads to Wnt/ β-catenin signaling activation. Expression of p27 was found to be repressed in pancreatic islet cell tumors (86).

3c) Pathways in multistep carcinogenesis. It appears that interaction of components of the PI3K/AKT pathway is involved in neuroendocrine tumor formation (87,88). Deregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway in neuroendocrine tumors can occur through a range of processes (see Figure 2), including gain of function by oncogenic mutations of PI3K signalling, loss of function of the tumor suppressor PTEN through gene deletion, mutation, micro-RNA expression or epigenetic silencing, upstream activation through receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) signaling, and/or downstream loss of the tumor suppressors p18 and p27.

A combination of a mutation in the MEN1 disease gene with other specific mutations of genes in the PI3K/AKT pathway may be associated with acceleration of tumor growth.

In addition, inactivated or absent menin promotes RAS expression; activating mutations of RAF, MEK, or ERK may accelerate cell proliferation (89).

Ecogenetic factors

Common environmental factors may interact with genetic predisposition to MEN1 and contribute to enhancement of tumor formation (70). In the parathyroid glands of patients with MEN1, a diet low in vitamin D or calcium may result in tumor growth. In the lactotropic cells of the pituitary gland, estrogenic or neuroleptic drugs may stimulate cell division. In the gastrin-producing cells of the stomach, presence of achlorhydria or use of histamine-H2 receptor or proton pump blockers may promote tumor growth (90). Lifestyle factors such as smoking and exposure to radiation may have deleterious effects on menin function and tumor growth, as with many types of cancer.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

Careful observation of patients and collaboration between disciplines, including molecular endocrinology, has opened new directions in the management of MEN1 syndrome, and has promoted development of novel target-directed therapy. Since 1980, life expectancy and quality of life have improved considerably.

By contrast, thymic tumors and duodenopancreatic tumors, including nonsecreting pancreatic tumors increase the risk of death (91). Rare, but aggressive, adrenal tumors may also cause early death. In MEN1 disease gene carriers in MEN1 families, most deaths were related to the disease, and probably resulted from additional mutations.

It is possible that consecutive and specific pathogenetic pathways are involved in MEN1 tumor formation. We presume that, through the inherited germline mutation resulting in organ-specific cell division, the patient is rendered vulnerable to additional, somatic mutations in these organs. These mutations may occur spontaneously or may be triggered by life style and/or environment. Predisposition and expression of other genetic diseases may also be involved. A complex genotype-phenotype relationship may be present. Unfortunately, for the majority of the patients it is not currently possible to predict the course of the disease.

Germline mutations that result in complete inactivation of the gene product apparently cause more severe disease.

Consequently, extensive periodical clinical examination has to be performed in all carriers of the MEN1 disease gene. In the near future, tumor gene-expression profiles and high throughput sequencing may permit more insight into additional genetic and epigenetic events that cause progression of tumor development. Functional analysis of MEN1 gene mutations is sometimes required to study the true effect of the mutation. In addition, as already suggested by Sir William Harvey, it is very helpful to investigate rare presentations of diseases (92). Eventually, this insight may allow target-directed and mutation-specific therapy.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Lips CJ conceived and designed the study and was also responsible for the manuscript writing and preparation of figures and table. Dreijerink KM searched the literature for important contents, provided assistance to the manuscript writing and to the molecular aspects of the menin protein. Höppener JW provided assistance to the study design, manuscript writing and final version of the manuscript.

REFERENCES

1. Wautot V, Vercherat C, Lespinasse J, Chambe B, Lenoir GM, Zhang CX, et al. Germline mutation profile of MEN1 in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: search for correlation between phenotype and the functional domains of the MEN1 protein. Hum Mutat. 2002;20(1):35-47, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.10092.

2. Kouvaraki MA, Lee JE, Shapiro SE, Gagel RF, Sherman SI, Sellin RV, et al. Genotype-phenotype analysis in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Surg. 2002;137(6):641-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.6.641.

3. Turner JJ, Leotlela PD, Pannett AA, Forbes SA, Bassett JH, Harding B, et al. Frequent occurrence of an intron 4 mutation inmultiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(6):2688-93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.87.6.2688.

4. Lemos MC, Thakker RV. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): analysis of 1336 mutations reported in the first decade following identification of the gene. Hum Mutat. 2008;29(1):22-32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/humu.20605.

5. Conte-Devolx B, Niccoli P. Groupe d'étude des Tumeurs Endocrines. Clinical characteristics of multiple endocrine neoplasia. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2010;194(1):69-78.

6. Wermer P. Genetic aspects of adenomatosis of endocrine glands. Am J Med. 1954;16:363-71, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(54)90353-8.

7. Khairi MRA, Dexter RN, Burzynski NJ, Johnston CC. Mucosal neuroma, pheochromocytoma and medullary thyroid carcinoma: multiple endocrine neoplasia-type III. Medicine. 1975;54(2):89-112.

8. Pellegata NS, Quintanilla-Martinez L, Siggelkow H, Samson E, Bink K, Hofler H, et al. Germ-line mutations in p27Kip1 cause a multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome in rats and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103:15558-63. Erratum in: Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(50):19213, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603877103

9. Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, Olufemi SE, Collins FS, Emmert-Buck MR, et al. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Science. 1997;276(5311):404-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.276.5311.404.

10. Lemmens I, van der Ven WJ, Kas K, Zhang CX, Giraud S, Wautot V, et al. Identification of the MEN1 gene. The European consortium on MEN1. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6(7):1177-83.

11. Zhang HL, Li WY, Zhang CP, Zhu YX, Wu L, Long HM, et al. Differentially expressed genes in Men1 knockout and wild type embryoid bodies for pancreatic islet development. Mol Med Report. 2011;4(2):301-5, http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2011.409. Epub 2011 Jan 3.

12. Hughes CM, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Milne TA, Copeland TD, Levine SS, Lee JC, et al. Menin associates with a trithorax family histone methyltransferase complex and with the hoxc8 locus. Mol Cell. 2004;13(4):587-97, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00081-4.

13. Milne TA, Hughes CM, Lloyd R, Yang Z, Rozenblatt-Rosen O, Dou Y, et al. Menin and MLL cooperatively regulate expression of cyclindependent kinase inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(3):749-54, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0408836102.

14. Lin SY, Elledge SJ. Multiple tumor suppressor pathways negatively regulate telomerase. Cell. 2003;113(7):881-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ S0092-8674(03)00430-6.

15. Dreijerink KM, Hoppener JW, Timmers, Lips CJ. Mechanism of disease: MEN 1-relation to chromatin modifications and transcription regulation. Nat Clin Pract Endocr Metab. 2006;2(10):562-70, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0292.

16. Agarwal SK, Guru SC, Heppner C, Erdos MR, Collins RM, Park SY, et al. Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD-activated transcription. Cell. 1999;96:143-52, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80967-8.

17. Yokoyama A, Wang Z, Wysocka J, Sanyal M, Aufiero DJ, Kitabayashi I, et al. Leukemia proto-oncoprotein MLL forms a SET1-like histone methyltransferase complex with menin to regulate Hox gene expression. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(13):5639-49, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.13.5639-5649.2004.

18. Kim H, Lee JE, Cho EJ, Liu JO, Youn HD. Menin, a tumor suppressor, represses JunD-mediated transcriptional activity by association with an mSin3A-histone deacetylase complex. Cancer Res. 2003;63(19):6135-9.

19. Murai MJ, Chruszcz M, Reddy G, Grembecka J, Cierpicki T. Crystal structure of Menin reveals the binding site for mixed lineage Leukemia (MLL) protein. J Biol Chem. 2011;9;286(36):31742-8.

20. Yokoyama A, Cleary ML. Menin critically links MLL proteins with LEDGF on cancer-associated target genes. Cancer Cell. 2008;14(1):36-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2008.05.003.

21. Agarwal SK, Impey S, McWeeney S, Scacheri PC, Collins FS, Goodman RH, et al. Distribution of menin-occupied regions in chromatin specifies a broad role of menin in transcriptional regulation. Neoplasia. 2007;9(2):101-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1593/neo.06706.

22. Heppner C, Bilimoria KY, Agarwal SK, Kester M, Whitty LJ, Guru SC, et al. The tumor suppressor protein menin interacts with NF-kappaB proteins and inhibits NF-kappaB-mediated transactivation. Oncogene. 2001;20(36):4917-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1204529.

23. Lemmens IH, Forsberg L, Pannett AA, Meyen E, Piehl F, Turner JJ, et al. Menin interacts directly with the homeobox-containing protein Pem. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;286(2):426-31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.5405.

24. Kaji H, Canaff L, Lebrun JJ, Goltzman D, Hendy GN. Inactivation of menin, a Smad3-interacting protein, blocks transforming growth factor type beta signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(7):3837-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.061358098.

25. Shattuck TM, Costa J, Bernstein M, Jensen RT, Chung DC, Arnold A. Mutational analysis of Smad3, a candidate tumor suppressor implicated in TGF-beta and menin pathways, in parathyroid adenomas and enteropancreatic endocrine tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(8):3911-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.87.8.3911.

26. Chen G, A J, Wang M, Farley S, Lee LY, Lee LC, Sawicki MP. Menin promotes the Wnt signaling pathway in pancreatic endocrine cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2008;6(12):1894-907.

27. Dreijerink KM, Mulder KW, Winkler GS, Hoppener JW, Lips CJ, Timmers HT. Menin links estrogen receptor activation to histone H3K4 trimethylation. Cancer Res. 2006;66(9):4929-35, http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-4461.

28. Wuescher L, Angevine K, Hinds T, Ramakrishnan S, Najjar SM, Mensah-Osman EJ. Am J Phsyiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011;301(3):E474-83.

29. Sukhodolets KE, Hickman AB, Agarwal SK, Sukhodolets MV, Obungu VH, Novotny EA, et al. The 32-kilodalton subunit of replication protein A interacts with menin, the product of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(2):493-509, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.2.493-509.2003.

30. Schnepp RW, Hou Z, Wang H, Petersen C, Silva A, Masai H, et al. Functional interaction between tumor suppressor menin and activator of S-phase kinase. Cancer Res. 2004;64(18):6791-6.

31. Busygina V, Kottemann MC, Scott KL, Plon SE, Bale AE. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 interacts with forkhead transcription factor CHES1 in DNA damage response. Cancer Res. 2006;66(17):8397-403, http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0061.

32. Jin S, Mao H, Schnepp RW, Sykes SM, Silva AC, D'Andrea AD, et al. Menin associates with FANCD2, a protein involved in repair of DNA damage. Cancer Res. 2003;63(14):4204-10.

33. Lopez-Egido J, Cunningham J, Berg M, Oberg K, Bongcam-Rudloff E, Gobl A. Menin's interaction with glial fibrillary acidic protein and vimentin suggests a role for the intermediate filament network in regulating menin activity. Exp Cell Res. 2002;278(2):175-83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/excr.2002.5575.

34. Wang Y, Ozawa A, Zaman S, Prasad NB, Chandrasekharappa SC, Agarwal SK, et al. The tumor suppressor protein menin inhibits AKT activation by regulating its cellular localization. Cancer Res. 2011;71(2):371-82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3221.

35. Ohkura N, Kishi M, Tsukada T, Yamaguchi K. Menin, a gene product responsible for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1, interacts with the putative tumor metastasis suppressor nm23. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2001;282(5):1206-10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/bbrc.2001.4723.

36. Yan J, Yang Y, Zhang H, King C, Kan HM, Cai Y, et al. Menin interacts with IQGAP1 to enhance intercellular adhesion of beta-cells. Oncogene. 2009;28(7):973-82, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/onc.2008.435.

37. Obungu VH, Lee Burns A, Agarwal SK, Chandrasekharapa SC, Adelstein RS, Marx SJ. Menin, a tumor suppressor, associates with nonmuscle myosin II-A heavy chain. Oncogene. 2003;22(41):6347-58, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206658.

38. Hou R, Manwaring LP, Moley JF, Whelan AA. A novel missense mutation in the MEN1 gene in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Endocr Pract. 2011;17(3):e63-7.

39. Vierimaa O, Ebeling TM, Kytölä S, Bloigu R, Eloranta E, Salmi J, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in Northern Finland; clinical features and genotype phenotype correlation. Eur J Endocrinol. 2007;157(3):285-94, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-07-0195.

40. Bazzi W, Renon M, Vercherat C, Hamze Z, Lacheretz-Bernigaud A, Wang H, et al. MEN1 missense mutations impair sensitization to apoptosis induced by wild-type menin in endocrine pancreatic tumor cells. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(5):1698-1709, http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.031.

41. Yaguchi H, Ohkura N, Takahashi M, Nagamura Y, Kitabayashi I, Tsukada T. Menin missense mutants associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are rapidly degraded via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(15):6569-80, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.15.6569-6580.2004.

42. Olufemi SE, Green JS, Manickam P, Guru SC, Agarwal SK, Kester MB, et al. Common ancestral mutation in the MEN1 gene is likely responsible for the prolactinoma variant of MEN1 (MEN1-Burin) in four kindreds from Newfoundland. Hum Mutat. 1998;11(4):264-69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1004(1998)11:4,264::AID-HUMU2.3.0.CO;2-V.

43. Kong C, Ellard S, Johnston C, Farid NR. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1Burin from Mauritius: a novel MEN1 mutation. J Endocrinol Invest. 2001;24(10):806-10.

44. Hao W, Skarulis MC, Simonds WF, Weinstein LS, Agarwal SK, Mateo C, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 variant with frequent prolactinoma and rare gastrinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(8):3776-84, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-031511.

45. Agarwal SK, Ozawa A, Mateo CM, Marx SJ. The MEN1 gene and pituitary tumours. Horm Res. 2009;71(Suppl. 2):131-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000192450.

46. Teh BT, Esapa CT, Houlston R, Grandell U, Farnebo F, Nordenskjöld M, et al. A family with isolated hyperparathyroidism segregating a missense MEN1 mutation and showing loss of the wild-type alleles in the parathyroid tumors. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63(5):1544-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/302097.

47. Honda M, Tsukada T, Tanaka H, Maruyama K, Yamaguchi K, Obara T, et al. A novel mutation of the MEN1 gene in a Japanese kindred with familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2000;142(2):138-43, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1420138.

48. Kassem M, Kruse TA, Wong FK, Larsson C, Teh BT. Familial isolated hyperparathyroidism as a variant of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in a large Danish pedigree. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85(1):165-7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.1.165.

49. Miedlich S, Lohmann T, Schneyer U, Lamesch P, Paschke R. Familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism-a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 variant? Eur J Endocrinol. 2001;145(2):155-60, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1450155.

50. Villablanca A, Wassif WS, Smith T, Höög A, Vierimaa O, Kassem M, et al. Involvement of the MEN1 gene locus in familial isolated hyperparathyroidism. Eur J Endocrinol. 2002;147(3):313-22, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1470313

51. Simonds WF, James-Newton LA, Agarwal SK, Yang B, Skarulis MC, Hendy GN, et al. Familial isolated hyperparathyroidism: clinical and genetic characteristics of 36 kindreds. Medicine (Baltimore) 2002;81:1-26.

52. Pannett AA, Kennedy AM, Turner JJ, Forbes SA, Cavaco BM, Bassett JH, et al. Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) germline mutations in familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:639-46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.2003.01765.x.

53. Hannan FM, Nesbit MA, Christie PT, Fratter C, Dudley NE, Sadler GP, Thakker RV. Familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism caused by mutations of the MEN1 gene. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2008;4:53-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ncpendmet0718.

54. Miyauchi A, Sato M, Matsubara S, Ohye H, Kihara M, Matsusaka K, et al. A family of MEN1 with a novel germline missense mutation and benign polymorphisms. Endocr J. 1998;45:753-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.45.753.

55. Ukita C, Yamaguchi M, Tanaka T, Shigeta H, Nishikawa M A novel missense mutation of the MEN1 gene in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 patient associated with carcinoid syndrome. Intern Med. 2003;42:1112-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.42.1112.

56. Schaaf L, Pickel J, Zinner K, Hering U, Hofler M, Goretzki PE, et al. Developing effective screening strategies in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN 1) on the basis of clinical and sequencing data of German patients with MEN 1. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2007;115:509-17, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970160.

57. Carrasco CA, Gonzalez AA, Carvajal CA,, Campusano C, Oestreicher E, Arteaga E, et al. Novel intronic mutation of MEN1 gene causing familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:4124-9, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-032101.

58. Dreijerink KM, van Beek AP, Lentjes EG, Post JG, van der Luijt RB, Canninga-van Dijk MR, et al. Acromegaly in a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) family with low penetrance of the disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;153:741-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/eje.1.02022.

59. Drori-Herishanu L, Horvath A, Nesterova M, Patronas Y, Lodish M, Bimpaki E, et al. An Intronic mutation is associated with prolactinoma in a young boy, decreased penetrance in his large family, and variable effects on MEN1 mRNA and protein. Horm Metab Res. 2009;41:630-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1216358.

60. Raef H, Zou M, Baitei EY, Al-Rijjal RA, Kaya N, Al-Hamed M, et al. A novel deletion of the MEN1 gene in a large family of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) with aggressive phenotype. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011; May 31, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.

61. Hasani-Ranjbar S, Amoli MM, Ebrahim-Habibi A, Gozashti MH, Khalili N, Sayyahpour FA, et al. A new frameshift MEN1 gene mutation associated with familial malignant insulinomas. Fam Cancer. 2011;10:343-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10689-010-9412-z.

62. Stratakis CA, Schussheim DH, Freedman SM, Keil MF, Pack SD, Agarwal SK, et al. Pituitary macroadenoma in a 5-year-old: an early expression of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;85:4776-80, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.12.4776.

63. van Wijk JP, Dreijerink KM, Pieterman CR, Lips CJ, Zelissen PM, Valk GD. Increased prevalence of impaired fasting glucose in MEN1 gene mutation carriers. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2011; Jul 4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04166.x.

64. Lourenco DM Jr, Toledo RA, Mackowiac II, Coutinho FL, Cavalcanti MG, Correia-Deur JE, et al. MEN1 type 1 in Brazil: MEN1 founding mutation, clinical features, and bone mineral density profile. Eur J Endocrinol 2008;159:259-74.

65. Pittas AG, Lau J, Hu FB, Dawson-Hughes B. The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007;92:2017-29, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.20070298.

66. Kayaniyil S, Vieth R, Retnakaran R. Association of vitamin D with insulin resistance an beta cell dysfunction in subjects at risk for diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1379-81

67. Goudet P, Bonithon-Kopp C, Murat A, Ruszniewski P, Niccoli P, Menegaux F, et al. Gender-related differences in MEN1 lesion occurrence and diagnosis.A 734-case cohort study from the GTE (Groupe d'etude des Tumeurs Endocrines). Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165:97-105, http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EJE-10-0950.

68. Karhu A, Aaltonen LA. Susceptibility to pituitary neoplasia related to MEN-1, CDKN1B and AIP mutations: an update. Hum Mol Genet. 16, spec No 1R73-9. (2007). Hum Mutat. 2002;20:35-47.

69. Georgitsi M, Heliövaara E, Paschke R, Kumar AV, Tischkowitz M, Vierimaa O, et al. Large genomic deletions in AIP in pituitary adenoma predisposition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:4146-51, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1003.

70. Laconi E. The evolving concept of tumor microenvironments. Bioessays. 2007;29:738-44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bies.20606.

71. Dreijerink KM, Varier RA, van Nuland R, Broekhuizen R, Valk GD, van der Wal JE, et al. Regulation of vitamin D receptor function in MEN1related parathyroid adenomas. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;313:1-8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2009.08.020.

72. van Veelen W, van Gasteren CJ, Acton DS, Franklin DS, Berger R, Lips CJ, et al. Synergistic effect of oncogenic RET and loss of p18 on medullary thyroid carcinoma development. Cancer Res. 2008;68:1329-37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-5754.

73. Van Veelen W, Klompmaker R, Gloerich M, van Gasteren CJ, van Kalkhoven E, Berger R, et al. P18 is a tumor suppressor gene involved in human medullary thyroid carcinoma and pheochromocytoma development. Int J Cancer. 2009;124:339-45, http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23977.

74. Agarwal SK, Mateo CM, Marx SJ. Rare germline mutations in cyclindependent kinase inhibitor genes in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and related states. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1826-34. Comment in: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1518-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-2083

75. Owens M, Stals K, Ellard S, Vaidya B. Germline mutations in the CDKN1B gene encoding p27 Kip1 are a rare cause of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;70:499-500, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03363.x.

76. Igreja S, Chahal HS, Akker SA, Gueorguiev M, Popovic V, Damjanovic S, et al. Assessment of p27 (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 1B) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) genes in multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1) syndrome patients without any detectable MEN1 gene mutations. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2009;70:259-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03379.x.

77. Bai F, Pei XH, Nishikawa T, Smith MD, Xiong Y. p18Ink4c, but not p27Kip1, collaborates with Men1 to suppress neuroendocrine organ tumors. Mol Cell Biol. 2007;27:1495-504, http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01764-06.

78. Molatore S, Pellegata NS. The MENX syndrome and p27: relationships with multiple endocrine neoplasia. Prog Brain Res. 2010;182:295-20, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(10)82013-8.

79. Marinoni I, Pellegata NS. p27kip1: a new multiple endocrine neoplasia gene? Neuroendocrinology. 2011;93:19-28, http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000320366.

80. Davenport, Agha A. The role of menin in parathyroid tumorigenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;668:79-86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-14419-1664-8_8.

81. Dworakowska D, Grossman AB. The pathophysiology of pituitary adenomas. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;23:525-41, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.05.004.

82. Seoane S, Perez-Fernandez R. The vitamin D receptor represses transcription of the pituitary transcription factor Pit-1 gene without involvement of the retinoid X receptor. Mol Endocrinol. 2006;20:735-48, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2005-0253.

83. Lacerte A, Lee EH, Reynaud R, Canaff L, de Guise C, Devost D, et al. Activin inhibits pituitary prolactin expression and cell growth through Smads, Pit-1 and menin. Mol Endocr. 2004;18:1558-69, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/me.2003-0470.

84. Lebrun JJ. Activin, TGF-beta and menin in pituitary tumorigenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2009;668:69-78, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-44191664-8_7.

85. Jiao Y, Shi C, Edil BH, de Wilde RF, Klimstra DS, Maitra A, et al. DAXX/ ATRX, MEN1, and mTOR pathway genes are frequently altered in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Science. 2011;331:1199-203. Comment in: Science. 2011;331:1145-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1200609.

86. Ishida E, Yamada M, Horiguchi K, Taguchi R, Ozawa A, Shibusawa N, et al. Attenuated expression of menin and p27 (Kip1) in an aggressive case of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) associated with an atypical prolactinoma and a malignant pancreatic endocrine tumor. Endocr J. 2011;58:287-96, http://dx.doi.org/10.1507/endocrj.K10E-158.

87. Cully M, You H, Levine AJ, Mak TW. Beyond PTEN mutations: the PI3K pathway as an integrator of multiple inputs during tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:184-92, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc1819.

88. Pitt SC, Chen H, Kunnimalaiyaan M. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling suppresses tumor cell proliferation and neuroendocrine marker expression in GI carcinoid tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2936-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-009-0591-5

89. Kim YS, Burns AL, Goldsmith PK, Heppner C, Park SY, Chandrasekharappa SC, et al. Stable overexpression of MEN1 suppresses tumorgenicity of RAS. Oncogene. 1999;18:5936-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1203005

90. Marx SJ, Simonds WF. Hereditary hormone excess: genes, molecular pathways, and syndromes. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:615-61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0037.

91. Goudet P, Murat A, Binquet C, Cardot-Bauters C, Costa A, Ruszniewski P, et al. Risk factors and causes of death in MEN1 disease. A GTE (Groupe d'Etude des Tumeurs Endocrines) cohort study among 758 patients. World J Surg. 2010;34:249-55.

92. The lessons of rare maladies. Annual Oration before the Medical Society of London by Sir Archibald Garrod. Br Med J. 1928:26:914-5.

No potential conflict of interest was reported.

E-mail: [e-mail]

Tel.: [phone]

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  09 May 2012
• Date of issue
  2012