Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
To determine the effects of a formal auditory training program on the behavioral, electrophysiological and subjective aspects of auditory function in individuals with bilateral high-frequency hearing loss.
METHOD:
A prospective study of seven individuals aged 46 to 57 years with symmetric, moderate high-frequency hearing loss ranging from 3 to 8 kHz was conducted. Evaluations of auditory processing (sound location, verbal and non-verbal sequential memory tests, the speech-in-noise test, the staggered spondaic word test, synthetic sentence identification with competitive ipsilateral and contralateral competitive messages, random gap detection and the standard duration test), auditory brainstem response and long-latency potentials and the administration of the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit questionnaire were performed in a sound booth before and immediately after formal auditory training.
RESULTS:
All of the participants demonstrated abnormal pre-training long-latency characteristics (abnormal latency or absence of the P3 component) and these abnormal characteristics were maintained in six of the seven individuals at the post-training evaluation. No significant differences were found between ears in the quantitative analysis of auditory brainstem responses or long-latency potentials. However, the subjects demonstrated improvements on all behavioral tests. For the questionnaire, the difference on the background noise subscale achieved statistical significance.
CONCLUSION:
Auditory training in adults with high-frequency hearing loss led to improvements in figure-background hearing skills for verbal sounds, temporal ordination and resolution, and communication in noisy environments. Electrophysiological changes were also observed because, after the training, some long latency components that were absent pre-training were observed during the re-evaluation.
Hearing; Hearing Loss; Auditory Perceptual Disorders; Hearing Tests; Hearing Impairment Correction
INTRODUCTION
It is possible to compensate for hearing loss with the use of hearing aids. However,
these devices can distort sounds and the user often continues to have difficulty
processing acoustic information, especially speech sounds in a noisy or
reverberating environment (11. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Rosen LF. Function of a hearing aid user
under stressful conditions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(10 Pt 1):929-39,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00034894001090...
).
In recent years, considerable advances have been made in hearing aid technology with
the advent of digital devices that allow a wide range of programming and
personalized settings. However, the simple placement of hearing aids may not provide
the hearing skills or understanding necessary for communication. Hearing aids are
designed to provide the greatest possible amount of acoustic information, but they
do not directly modify the user's brain or behavior (22. Sweetow RW. Training the auditory brain to hear. The Hearing
Journal. 2005;58(6):10-16,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000324238.75342.25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.00003242...
).
While hearing aids are efficient for overcoming hearing loss, they do not help users
overcome hearing problems stemming from auditory processing disorder (APD) (33. Stach B. Hearing aid amplification and central auditory
disorders. In Sandlin RE. (editor) Textbook of hearing aid amplification - 2nd
edition, San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000b, 607-41.). APD is a complex, heterogeneous group of
hearing abnormalities often associated with a set of hearing deficits and normal
auditory sensitivity (44. Putter-Katz H, Said LA, Feldman I, Miran DB, Kushnir DM, Muchnik
C, et al. Treatment and evaluation indices of Auditory Processing Disorder.
Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):357-64,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35884.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35884...
). Moreover, some
individuals only have hearing loss at high frequencies and a hearing aid does not
adequately address the complaints of such individuals with regard to understanding
speech in a noisy environment (55. Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Auditory training: principles and
approaches for remediation and managing auditory processing disorders. Seminars
in Hearing. 2002;23(4):297-308,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35878.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35878...
). Such
individuals are often left with no treatment options and no hope for improvements in
communication.
The ability of the auditory system to process acoustic signals can be optimized
through auditory training therapy, which has been widely employed for individuals
with APD (66. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, et al.
Language Comprehension in Language Learning Impaired Children Improved with
Acoustically Modified Speech. Science. 1996;271(5245):81-4,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.52...
7. Musiek FE, Baran JA. Amplification and the central auditory
nervous system. In Valente M (editor), Hearing Aids: standards, option
and limitations. New York: Thieme; 1996:407-37.
8. Musiek FE, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory
processing disorders - a case study. Seminars in Hearing. 1998;19(4):357-65,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983...
9. Musiek FE, Berge BE. A neuroscience view of auditory
training/stimulation and central auditory processing disorders. In Masters MG,
Stecker NA, Katz J. Central auditory processing disorders - mostly management.
Boston: Allyn and Bacons; 1998. p. 15-32.
10. Chermak GD, Musiek FE, Craig CH. Considerations in the
assessment of central auditory processing disorders. In Chemark GD, Musiek FE,
Craig CH., - Central auditory processing disorders - new perspectives. San
Diego, Singular Publishing Group; 1998, p. 91-107.
11. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory
perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training.
NeuroReport. 1998;9(16):3557-60.
12. Kraus N, McGee T. Potenciais evocados de longa latência.
In: Katz, J. Tratado de audiologia clinica. 4a.ed. São Paulo:
Manole; 1999. p. 403-420-1313. Musiek FE. Auditory plasticity: what is it, and why do
clinicians need to know? The Hearing Journal.
2000;55(4):70.). Auditory training constitutes a set of conditions and/or tasks
designed to activate the auditory system and associated systems to allow beneficial
changes in auditory behavior and in the central auditory nervous system (1414. Musiek FE, Chermak GD, Weihing J. Auditory Training. In: Musiek
FE, Chermak GD. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder, Plural
Publishing, 2007.).
Auditory-evoked potentials offer an advantage over traditional behavioral evaluations
for assessing the progress of individuals undergoing therapeutic programs because
neurophysiological changes stemming from therapy may occur prior to behavioral
changes (1515. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory
plasticity: changes in N1-P2- complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hear.
2001;22(2):79-90,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-20010...
,1616. Jirsa RE. Clinical Efficacy of Eletrophysiologic measures in APD
management programs. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):349-55,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883...
). A number of researchers have stated that changes in the
neurophysiology of the central auditory nervous system following auditory training
can be measured using short-latency and long-latency auditory-evoked potentials
(1515. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory
plasticity: changes in N1-P2- complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hear.
2001;22(2):79-90,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-20010...
,1616. Jirsa RE. Clinical Efficacy of Eletrophysiologic measures in APD
management programs. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):349-55,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883...
17. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical
changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2002;45(3):564-72,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002...
-1818. Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Ilayes EA, Kraus N. Auditory
training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res.
2005;156(1):95-103,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05....
).
Self-evaluation questionnaires have also been used to help determine treatment plans
and assess the efficacy of therapy from the patient's point of view (1919. Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report
outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2000;21(6):625-39,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200012000-00009.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-20001...
). The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid
Benefit (APHAB) questionnaire addresses the benefits of hearing aid usage.
The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of a formal auditory training program on the behavioral, electrophysiological and subjective aspects of auditory function in individuals with bilateral high-frequency hearing loss.
METHOD
This study was conducted at the neuroaudiology and electrophysiology clinics of the Department of Hearing and Speech Therapy of the Federal University of São Paulo (Brazil). The inclusion criteria were age between 15 and 59 years, moderate symmetrical hearing loss beginning at 3000 Hz in both ears, at least 72% speech recognition bilaterally and no evidence of neurological or cognitive impairment. This study received approval from the university ethics committee. The participants received verbal information about the objectives and procedures of the study and signed a statement of informed consent agreeing to participate.
A brief clinical history was performed for each patient to acquire hearing data using a specific chart designed by the researcher. Evaluations were performed in two sessions, one to assess basic hearing and auditory processing (behavioral tests) and one to perform the electrophysiological evaluation and administer the APHAB questionnaire. The basic hearing evaluation included taking the patient's history and performing otoscopy, pure-tone threshold audiometry, logoaudiometry, tympanometry and a contralateral acoustic reflex study.
The free-field evaluation of auditory processing involved the sound location test (SLT; 70-80 dB) and verbal and non-verbal sequential memory tests (70-90 dB). The other tests were performed in a sound booth using verbal and non-verbal stimuli recorded on a compact disc (CD) and delivered through earphones (TDH 50P) coupled to a two-channel audiometer (GSI-61, Grandson Stadler, Minneapolis, USA). The following tests were performed: the duration pattern test (DPT), the staggered spondaic word (SSW) test, synthetic sentence identification (SSI) with competitive ipsilateral competitive messages (ICM) and contralateral competitive messages (CCM), the random gap detection test (RGDT) and the speech-in-noise test (SNT). The tests came from the Central Auditory Processing Assessment Manual CDs (2020. Pereira LD, Schochat E. Manual de avaliação do processamento auditivo central. São Paulo: Lovise; 1997.), with the exceptions of the DPT (2121. Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology. 1987;26(2):76-88.) and RGDT (2222. Keith RW. RGDT - Random gap detection test. Auditec of St. Louis; 2000.).
Biologic Traveler equipment (Chicago Medical Equipment, Chicago, USA) was used and the preparation methods were the same as those used for auditory-evoked potentials testing. After the procedure was explained to the patient, the skin, cranial vertex and earlobes were cleaned with an abrasive paste and gauze. The inter-electrode impedance was equal to or less than 5 kOhms prior to the beginning of the test. The exams were performed in a silent room in partial darkness. The volunteer was instructed to remain still and relaxed with eyes closed throughout the auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing and with eyes opened during the long-latency auditory-evoked potential (LLAEP) testing (P300). For LLAEP, stimuli were presented using insertion earphones (ER-3) at an intensity of 80 dBHL with binaural presentation. The surface electrodes were attached with electrolytic paste (Ten20) and micropore adhesive tape to the forehead (ground electrode), cranial vertex (active electrode) and earlobes (reference electrodes), following the standard international system (2323. Jasper HA. The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electroencepholography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1958;10:371-5.). The stimulus frequency was 1000 Hz and the rare stimulus was 2000 Hz, with appearance probabilities of 80% and 20%, respectively, presented using the “oddball” paradigm. Latencies were marked at the point of maximum wave amplitude (the largest peak). The amplitudes were marked from the peak of the wave to the baseline. Subtraction of the rare line gave rise to the wave form on which the latency and amplitude of the P3 component were marked. The recordings were smoothed.
To determine the ABR, the acoustic stimuli were clicks of rarefied polarity presented in only one ear at 80 dBHL. Two thousand stimuli on two recordings were used to ensure the reproducibility of the readings. The electrodes were placed on the forehead (ground electrode) and both earlobes (2323. Jasper HA. The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electroencepholography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1958;10:371-5.). The absolute latencies of waves I, III and V and the I-III, III-V and I-V inter-peaks were analyzed.
Prior to and following auditory training, the participants responded to the APHAB questionnaire, which is a self-evaluation measure designed to quantify the disability associated with hearing loss and the reduction or non-reduction in disability resulting from hearing-aid use. Because no hearing aids were used in the present study, the APHAB was used for a subjective evaluation of the benefits of auditory training.
The volunteers underwent auditory training, which consisted of eight 45-minute sessions held once or twice a week, depending on the availability of each volunteer. The sessions were organized so that the activities increased in complexity to offer an increasing challenge to the auditory system throughout each session. Thus, the signal-to-noise ratio was adjusted from positive (easier) to negative (more difficult). The sessions included intensity, frequency and duration training for open-field sounds, figure-background hearing skills for verbal (phrases and numbers) and non-verbal sounds in dichotic hearing and auditory closure using earphones. The behavioral and electrophysiological evaluation results before and after training were compared.
The data were subjected to statistical analysis. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the results of the behavioral and electrophysiological evaluations and the APHAB before and after auditory training. Statistically significant findings based on the adopted significance level are highlighted in red or indicated with an asterisk (*). Findings with a tendency toward significance (approaching the acceptable limit: up to five percentage points above the established alpha value) are highlighted in blue or indicated with a hash symbol (#). The significance level was set to 5% (p<0.05) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS
Seven individuals, 3 females (42.9%) and 4 males (57.1%), were evaluated. Their mean age was 52 years (range: 46 to 57 years). Two had a complete elementary school education, two had a complete high school education, one had not completed elementary school, one had not completed high school and one had a partial university education. All of the participants were right-handed and had hearing complaints, such as tinnitus, attention deficit and difficulty understanding speech in a noisy environment.
Based on the qualitative analysis of the electrophysiological evaluation, no significant change in ABR occurred following auditory training. All seven individuals had abnormal P300 (abnormal latency or the absence of the P3 component) at the pre-training evaluation and one individual had a normal P300 at the post-training evaluation. No significant differences were found between ears for the quantitative analysis of ABR or P300. Thus, the data from both ears were pooled. The same results occurred for the behavioral tests. Table 1 displays the quantitative data on the absolute latency of waves I, III and V and the I-III, III-V and I-V inter-peak intervals for ABR before and after auditory training. No significant differences were found between evaluation times.
No significant differences were found regarding the latency and amplitude of LLAEP-P300 between evaluations (Table 2). However, it is essential to emphasize that the patient who did not present a P3 wave during the pre-training evaluation presented this component during the re-evaluation right after the auditory training.
Figure 1 shows the performance of the individuals on the behavioral evaluation tests of auditory processing. The pre-training and post-training results are expressed as percentage values.
Mean performance of individuals on behavioral evaluations of auditory processing before and after auditory training. Verbal sequential memory test (VSMT), Non-verbal sequential memory test (NVSMT), Sound location test (SLT), Speech-in-noise test (SNT), Staggered spondaic word (SSW) test, Synthetic sentence identification with competitive ipsilateral (SSI-ICM) and contralateral (SSI-CCM) competitive messages, Duration pattern test (DPT). Statistically significant (*); tending toward significance (#).
Mean performance of individuals on each APHAB subscale before and after auditory training. Background noise (BN), Reverberation (RV), Aversiveness (AV), Ease of communication (EC). Statistically significant (*).
On the RGDT, the mean interval (in ms) of the frequencies necessary for the individuals to perceive two sounds was significantly lower at the post-training evaluation compared with the pre-training evaluation.
Moreover, reductions in the complaints on all subscales of the APHAB occurred at the post-training evaluation compared with the pre-training evaluation (Figure 2). However, only the difference for the background noise subscale achieved statistical significance.
DISCUSSION
The present sample included both male and female adults, all of whom were right-handed. Because the participants were in the economically active age range, a lack of availability resulting from work-related issues explains the small number of subjects.
The qualitative analysis demonstrated differences in the electrophysiological
evaluation (ABR and LLAEP-P300) following auditory training. Regarding ABR, despite
the absence of substantial changes in the overall sample, one individual went from
the abnormal to normal classification following auditory training and one went from
a normal to an abnormal classification. All seven individuals had abnormal P300
waves at the pre-training evaluation and one individual had a normal P300 wave at
the post-training evaluation. Moreover, the shape of the waves improved, which
facilitated the identification of the components at the second evaluation. These
data demonstrate that a neurophysiological change that could be measured objectively
occurred following auditory training (1111. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory
perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training.
NeuroReport. 1998;9(16):3557-60.,1212. Kraus N, McGee T. Potenciais evocados de longa latência.
In: Katz, J. Tratado de audiologia clinica. 4a.ed. São Paulo:
Manole; 1999. p. 403-420,1515. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory
plasticity: changes in N1-P2- complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hear.
2001;22(2):79-90,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-20010...
,1717. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical
changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2002;45(3):564-72,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002...
,2525. Alonso R, Schochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em crianças com transtorno de processamento auditivo (central):
avaliação comportamental e eletrofisiológica.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(5):726-32.,2626. Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid
users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010...
).
Regarding the quantitative analysis of ABR (Table 1), an increase in the latency of wave III that tended toward statistical significance was found after auditory training. This increase may be explained by the fact that one patient did not exhibit waves I or II bilaterally on the pre-training ABR, but these waves appeared in the left ear following training. No statistically significant differences in amplitude were found between evaluation times.
Previous studies using LLAEP to evaluate neurophysiological changes following
auditory training have reported improvements in amplitude, latency and/or wave shape
after hearing stimulation. However, there is no consensus on whether amplitude or
latency is more appropriate for confirming neuronal plasticity (1717. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical
changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2002;45(3):564-72,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002...
,1818. Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Ilayes EA, Kraus N. Auditory
training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res.
2005;156(1):95-103,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05....
,2424. Musiek FE, Shinn JMS, Hare CMA. Plasticity, Auditory Training
and Auditory Processing Disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):263-75,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862...
25. Alonso R, Schochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em crianças com transtorno de processamento auditivo (central):
avaliação comportamental e eletrofisiológica.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(5):726-32.
26. Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid
users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010...
-2727. Zalcman TE, Shochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em indivíduos com transtorno do processamento auditivo. Rev Soc Bras
Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(4):310-4.). In the present study, no significant difference in
LLAEP-P300 was found with regard to either latency or amplitude (2828. Marangoni AT. Treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos
após traumatismo cranioencefálico [thesis] São Paulo:
Federal University of São Paulo; 2012.). Despite the lack of statistically
significant changes in short-latency and long-latency auditory-evoked potentials in
the present study, one of the subjects did not exhibit P300 responses or waves I and
III bilaterally on the ABR test during the pre-training evaluation, but LLAEP
responses appeared bilaterally after auditory training and waves I and III appeared
for the left ear. These data indicate a qualitative improvement, thereby suggesting
neuronal synchrony.
Regarding the analysis of performances on the behavioral tests of auditory processing
(Figure 1), the participants
demonstrated improvements on all tests except the SLT, with statistically
significant improvements on the SSW (quantitative analysis), the SSI-ICM (0 and -10)
and the DPT. Moreover, a tendency toward improvement was found for the non-verbal
sequential memory test and the SSI-CCM (-40). These improvements can be attributed
to auditory training; they demonstrate the generalization of the trained aspects to
different contexts, as reported in previous studies (66. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, et al.
Language Comprehension in Language Learning Impaired Children Improved with
Acoustically Modified Speech. Science. 1996;271(5245):81-4,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.52...
,1717. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical
changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2002;45(3):564-72,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002...
). Moreover, the mean
performance on the SSW, SSI-ICM (-10) and DPT tests went from abnormal to normal,
demonstrating the adequacy of hearing skills for temporal ordination and
figure-background for verbal sounds (words). Previous studies have found
improvements on all of these behavior tests following auditory training in different
populations, such as individuals with APD, adult and elderly hearing aid wearers and
victims of head trauma (2525. Alonso R, Schochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em crianças com transtorno de processamento auditivo (central):
avaliação comportamental e eletrofisiológica.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(5):726-32.
26. Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid
users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010...
27. Zalcman TE, Shochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em indivíduos com transtorno do processamento auditivo. Rev Soc Bras
Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(4):310-4.
28. Marangoni AT. Treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos
após traumatismo cranioencefálico [thesis] São Paulo:
Federal University of São Paulo; 2012.-2929. Miranda EC, Gil D, Iorio MCM. Treinamento auditivo formal em
idosos usuários de próteses auditivas. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol.
2008;74(6):919-25,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000600016.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008...
).
On the RGDT, the mean interval (ms) necessary for the individuals to perceive the presence of two sounds was significantly lower at the post-training evaluation compared with the pre-training evaluation. Thus, the participants' performance went from abnormal to normal following auditory training, and this change was related to phonological aspects and hearing discrimination. These data suggest an increase in processing efficiency and speed, which may contribute to improved communication in a noisy environment where acoustic cues are not completely available.
In the present study, the second evaluation occurred immediately following the end of the auditory training sessions. Studies have shown that neural changes often precede behavioral changes (1111. Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. NeuroReport. 1998;9(16):3557-60.,1212. Kraus N, McGee T. Potenciais evocados de longa latência. In: Katz, J. Tratado de audiologia clinica. 4a.ed. São Paulo: Manole; 1999. p. 403-420), which suggests that a longer follow-up time may reveal even greater improvements in hearing skills.
As stated above, it was not the aim of the present investigation to evaluate the
maintenance of benefits acquired through auditory training. However, it is possible
that once the neural substrate has been altered and the behavioral pattern has been
learned, the environment and its demands may reinforce the learned pattern and even
maintain a tendency toward improvement after the individual returns to his/her
routine activities once the training sessions end. The literature offers reports of
long-term follow-up periods in which the maintenance of gains and even a tendency
toward improvement have been found (66. Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, et al.
Language Comprehension in Language Learning Impaired Children Improved with
Acoustically Modified Speech. Science. 1996;271(5245):81-4,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.52...
,77. Musiek FE, Baran JA. Amplification and the central auditory
nervous system. In Valente M (editor), Hearing Aids: standards, option
and limitations. New York: Thieme; 1996:407-37.). Other authors have stated that the
maintenance of learned patterns depends on an individual's functional use of
these patterns (1717. Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical
changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res.
2002;45(3):564-72,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002...
,2424. Musiek FE, Shinn JMS, Hare CMA. Plasticity, Auditory Training
and Auditory Processing Disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):263-75,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862...
). Thus, these findings affirm that the auditory training
proved effective at minimizing auditory processing difficulties among adults with
high-frequency hearing loss.
No self-assessment tool specifically designed to quantify changes resulting from
auditory training in individuals with high-frequency hearing loss was reported in
the literature. Importantly, the APHAB was not used for its original purpose;
rather, it was used to quantify the subjective impact of auditory training because
there are no existing instruments designed for that purpose. The selection of this
questionnaire was based on the fact that the APHAB has been adapted and validated in
Portuguese (3030. Almeida K. Avaliação objetiva e subjetiva do
benefício das próteses auditivas em adultos [tese]. São
Paulo: Federal University of São Paulo; 1998.). Moreover, this measure is
considered a powerful tool for documenting the benefit of a given therapeutic
approach because it is fast and easy to administer and easy to understand (3131. Weinstein BE. Outcome measures in rehabilitative audiology. In
Alpiner JG, McCarthy PA. Rehabilitative audiology - children and adults. Third
ed. Baltimore: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p.
575-94.). In the present study, the participants
showed improvements on all subscales, including a statistically significant
improvement on the Environmental Noise subscale. Other authors reported similar
results in a study involving adults with hearing aids (2626. Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid
users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010...
). These data confirm the results of the behavioral tests,
indicating an improvement in communication in noisy environments, as reported by the
patients.
It is important to note the large number of complaints from individuals with preserved hearing at low and medium frequencies both before and after auditory training, especially among those who reported tinnitus. Improved communication in adverse environments should be the main goal of auditory training for individuals with hearing impairment and for those who have normal hearing but have APD because such environments are very common in the daily lives of the majority of individuals, especially economically active adults.
Intensive auditory training with increasing complexity maximizes the plasticity of
the brain cortex and generates learning (3232. Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL,
Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of language-impaired children ameliorated
by training. Science. 1996;271(5245):77-80,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.77.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.52...
).
Because auditory training took place in this manner in the present study, the
behavioral results demonstrate that the training enhanced neuronal plasticity, which
was reflected in behavioral changes. A number of authors have reported improvements
in hearing skills following auditory training as a result of changes in the neural
substrate and the present data agree with those reports. These findings suggest that
auditory training is an efficient rehabilitation tool for central hearing
abnormalities, as studies have demonstrated that the central nervous system can be
altered through auditory training (88. Musiek FE, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory
processing disorders - a case study. Seminars in Hearing. 1998;19(4):357-65,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983...
,2626. Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid
users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010...
,2727. Zalcman TE, Shochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo
formal em indivíduos com transtorno do processamento auditivo. Rev Soc Bras
Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(4):310-4.,3333. Ziliotto ZN, Pereira LD. Estimulação auditiva em
cabina acústica: relato de caso. In Pereira, LD, Azevedo MF, Machado LP,
Ziliotto KN. Processamento auditivo: terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem
de reabilitação. São Paulo: Lovise [in
press].).
In addition to the improvement measured by the tests applied, it should be stressed that the individuals reported improvements in their day-to-day living, especially with regard to attention. This finding is in agreement with previous studies (2828. Marangoni AT. Treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos após traumatismo cranioencefálico [thesis] São Paulo: Federal University of São Paulo; 2012.,3333. Ziliotto ZN, Pereira LD. Estimulação auditiva em cabina acústica: relato de caso. In Pereira, LD, Azevedo MF, Machado LP, Ziliotto KN. Processamento auditivo: terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem de reabilitação. São Paulo: Lovise [in press].,3434. Schochat E, Beluda DA, Silva PML. Habilitando a audição. In Pereira, LD, Azevedo MF, Machado LP, Ziliotto K. Processamento auditivo: terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem de reabilitação. São Paulo: Lovise [in press].) that found that both patients and family members reported improvements in daily living following auditory training, especially with regard to attention.
With the constant advances in technology, hearing aids are often effective for
solving the problem of a loss of hearing sensitivity. However, hearing devices do
not solve other hearing problems, such as difficulty with locating sounds and
temporal processing and signal-to-noise ratio deficits (11. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Rosen LF. Function of a hearing aid user
under stressful conditions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(10 Pt 1):929-39,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901006.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00034894001090...
,22. Sweetow RW. Training the auditory brain to hear. The Hearing
Journal. 2005;58(6):10-16,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000324238.75342.25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.00003242...
,1212. Kraus N, McGee T. Potenciais evocados de longa latência.
In: Katz, J. Tratado de audiologia clinica. 4a.ed. São Paulo:
Manole; 1999. p. 403-420,3535. Tremblay KL. Central auditory plasticity: implication for
auditory rehabilitation. The Hearing Journal. 2003;56(1):10-6,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000292995.53429.6a.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.00002929...
).
Thus, individuals with high-frequency hearing loss often have no treatment options
to address their complaints and difficulties. It is therefore important to evaluate
the central auditory pathway in such patients and place them in an auditory
rehabilitation program, because hearing therapists should not overlook these
patients. Moreover, further studies of auditory training involving long-term
follow-up and the use of more specific self-evaluation tools should be conducted
with these patients.
Based on the findings of the present study, auditory training in adults with high-frequency hearing loss leads to improvements in figure-background hearing skills for verbal sounds, temporal ordination and resolution, communication in noisy environments and changes in electrophysiological aspects (ABR and P300).
REFERENCES
-
1Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Rosen LF. Function of a hearing aid user under stressful conditions. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2000;109(10 Pt 1):929-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901006.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/000348940010901006 -
2Sweetow RW. Training the auditory brain to hear. The Hearing Journal. 2005;58(6):10-16, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000324238.75342.25.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000324238.75342.25 -
3Stach B. Hearing aid amplification and central auditory disorders. In Sandlin RE. (editor) Textbook of hearing aid amplification - 2nd edition, San Diego: Singular Publishing Group; 2000b, 607-41.
-
4Putter-Katz H, Said LA, Feldman I, Miran DB, Kushnir DM, Muchnik C, et al. Treatment and evaluation indices of Auditory Processing Disorder. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):357-64, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35884.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35884 -
5Chermak GD, Musiek FE. Auditory training: principles and approaches for remediation and managing auditory processing disorders. Seminars in Hearing. 2002;23(4):297-308, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35878.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35878 -
6Tallal P, Miller SL, Bedi G, Byma G, Wang X, Nagarajan SS, et al. Language Comprehension in Language Learning Impaired Children Improved with Acoustically Modified Speech. Science. 1996;271(5245):81-4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.81 -
7Musiek FE, Baran JA. Amplification and the central auditory nervous system. In Valente M (editor), Hearing Aids: standards, option and limitations. New York: Thieme; 1996:407-37.
-
8Musiek FE, Schochat E. Auditory training and central auditory processing disorders - a case study. Seminars in Hearing. 1998;19(4):357-65, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1082983 -
9Musiek FE, Berge BE. A neuroscience view of auditory training/stimulation and central auditory processing disorders. In Masters MG, Stecker NA, Katz J. Central auditory processing disorders - mostly management. Boston: Allyn and Bacons; 1998. p. 15-32.
-
10Chermak GD, Musiek FE, Craig CH. Considerations in the assessment of central auditory processing disorders. In Chemark GD, Musiek FE, Craig CH., - Central auditory processing disorders - new perspectives. San Diego, Singular Publishing Group; 1998, p. 91-107.
-
11Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T. The time course of auditory perceptual learning: neurophysiological changes during speech-sound training. NeuroReport. 1998;9(16):3557-60.
-
12Kraus N, McGee T. Potenciais evocados de longa latência. In: Katz, J. Tratado de audiologia clinica. 4aed. São Paulo: Manole; 1999. p. 403-420
-
13Musiek FE. Auditory plasticity: what is it, and why do clinicians need to know? The Hearing Journal. 2000;55(4):70.
-
14Musiek FE, Chermak GD, Weihing J. Auditory Training. In: Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Handbook of Central Auditory Processing Disorder, Plural Publishing, 2007.
-
15Tremblay K, Kraus N, McGee T, Ponton C, Otis B. Central auditory plasticity: changes in N1-P2- complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hear. 2001;22(2):79-90, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001 -
16Jirsa RE. Clinical Efficacy of Eletrophysiologic measures in APD management programs. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):349-55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35883 -
17Tremblay KL, Kraus N. Auditory Training induces asymmetrical changes in cortical neural activity. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(3):564-72, http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045).
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/045) -
18Russo NM, Nicol TG, Zecker SG, Ilayes EA, Kraus N. Auditory training improves neural timing in the human brainstem. Behav Brain Res. 2005;156(1):95-103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.012.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2004.05.012 -
19Bentler RA, Kramer SE. Guidelines for choosing a self-report outcome measure. Ear Hear. 2000;21(6):625-39, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200012000-00009.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200012000-00009 -
20Pereira LD, Schochat E. Manual de avaliação do processamento auditivo central. São Paulo: Lovise; 1997.
-
21Musiek FE, Pinheiro ML. Frequency patterns in cochlear, brainstem, and cerebral lesions. Audiology. 1987;26(2):76-88.
-
22Keith RW. RGDT - Random gap detection test. Auditec of St. Louis; 2000.
-
23Jasper HA. The ten-twenty system of the International Federation. Electroencepholography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1958;10:371-5.
-
24Musiek FE, Shinn JMS, Hare CMA. Plasticity, Auditory Training and Auditory Processing Disorders. Semin Hear. 2002;23(4):263-75, http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35862 -
25Alonso R, Schochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo formal em crianças com transtorno de processamento auditivo (central): avaliação comportamental e eletrofisiológica. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(5):726-32.
-
26Gil D, Iorio MCM. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users. Clinics. 2010;65(2):165-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008 -
27Zalcman TE, Shochat E. A eficácia do treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos com transtorno do processamento auditivo. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2007;12(4):310-4.
-
28Marangoni AT. Treinamento auditivo formal em indivíduos após traumatismo cranioencefálico [thesis] São Paulo: Federal University of São Paulo; 2012.
-
29Miranda EC, Gil D, Iorio MCM. Treinamento auditivo formal em idosos usuários de próteses auditivas. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2008;74(6):919-25, http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000600016.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992008000600016 -
30Almeida K. Avaliação objetiva e subjetiva do benefício das próteses auditivas em adultos [tese]. São Paulo: Federal University of São Paulo; 1998.
-
31Weinstein BE. Outcome measures in rehabilitative audiology. In Alpiner JG, McCarthy PA. Rehabilitative audiology - children and adults. Third ed. Baltimore: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins; 2000. p. 575-94.
-
32Merzenich MM, Jenkins WM, Johnston P, Schreiner C, Miller SL, Tallal P. Temporal processing deficits of language-impaired children ameliorated by training. Science. 1996;271(5245):77-80, http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.77.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.271.5245.77 -
33Ziliotto ZN, Pereira LD. Estimulação auditiva em cabina acústica: relato de caso. In Pereira, LD, Azevedo MF, Machado LP, Ziliotto KN. Processamento auditivo: terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem de reabilitação. São Paulo: Lovise [in press].
-
34Schochat E, Beluda DA, Silva PML. Habilitando a audição. In Pereira, LD, Azevedo MF, Machado LP, Ziliotto K. Processamento auditivo: terapia fonoaudiológica. Uma abordagem de reabilitação. São Paulo: Lovise [in press].
-
35Tremblay KL. Central auditory plasticity: implication for auditory rehabilitation. The Hearing Journal. 2003;56(1):10-6, http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000292995.53429.6a.
» http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.HJ.0000292995.53429.6a
-
No potential conflict of interest was reported.
Publication Dates
-
Publication in this collection
2014
History
-
Received
14 Aug 2014 -
Reviewed
3 Sept 2014 -
Accepted
23 Sept 2014