SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.74Prospective Analysis of Short- and Mid-term Knowledge Retention after a Brief Ultrasound Course for Undergraduate Medical StudentsEvaluation of the discrepancy between clinical diagnostic hypotheses and anatomopathological diagnoses resulting from autopsies author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links



Print version ISSN 1807-5932On-line version ISSN 1980-5322

Clinics vol.74  São Paulo  2019  Epub Sep 16, 2019 


Who and Where are the University of São Paulo Medical School Graduates?

Gustavo Rosa GameiroI  *

Leonardo Kenji Sakaue KoyamaI

Ana Luisa Ito Baptista da CruzI

Alex Jones Flores CassenoteII

Aline Gil Alves GuillouxIII

Aluísio Augusto Cotrim SeguradoII  IV

Mário César SchefferIII

IFaculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR

IIDepartamento de Gastroenterologia, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR

IIIDepartamento de Medicina Preventiva, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR

IVDepartamento de Molestias Infecciosas e Parasitarias, Faculdade de Medicina FMUSP, Universidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BR



To evaluate the impact of a complex-care-based medical school in the context of the Brazilian health care system on students’ career choices.


This was a retrospective cross-sectional study based on medical regulatory organization records. It included records for 7,419 physicians who graduated from FMUSP. Geographic data were analyzed using Kernel maps, and the statistical analysis was performed with SPSS® version 24.0. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered significant.


Of the 7,419 physicians, 68.6% (95% CI 67.5-69.7) were male, and 20.7% (95% CI 19.8%-21.7%) had no medical specialty, compared to 46.4% nationwide. Internal medicine and surgery-based specialties were more popular, accounting for 39.4% (95% CI 38.3%-40.5%) and 16.8% (95% CI 15.5%-17.6%) of our study group, compared to the Brazilian averages of 25.9% and 13.5%. Our graduates also had a higher probability of staying in São Paulo City, especially when born outside the city.


We believe that FMUSP remains an interesting model for studying the impact of a highly specialized center on the education and career choices of medical students.

Key words: University of São Paulo; Medical Education; Medical School; Human Resources in Health


The Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP) has been central to the formation of leaders in the context of the Brazilian medical system. It currently has the largest hospital complex in Latin America, and it is responsible for the graduation of 175 physicians each year, who go on to assume high-level positions in their specialties. In addition, FMUSP is known for innovation in several areas; its graduates (MDs) have been responsible for many surgical innovations, including one of the first living donor liver transplants (1), the solution for the transposition of great vessels (2) and the first successful uterine transplant (3), among many others. All of this makes FMUSP one of the 100 best medical schools in the world (4).

In Brazil, the distribution of physicians across the national territory is heterogeneous. Despite the fact that there are approximately 450,000 professionals in the country (approximately 2.18 physicians per 1000 inhabitants), they are concentrated in large Brazilian cities, such as Vitória (12.27 physicians per 1000 inhabitants). In contrast, some states such as Maranhão have 0.87 physicians per 1000 inhabitants, demonstrating an uneven distribution of medical professionals. This distribution has led the government to invest in programs that facilitate the creation of medical schools (5). This has contributed to a change in the profile of physicians, leading the population of physicians to become much younger, with a higher proportion of females, despite the male majority in the Brazilian population (54.4% male vs. 45.6% female) (6). The aim of this paper was to analyze the profile and distribution of graduates from FMUSP.


This study was a retrospective study based on databases, including the administrative and legal register from the Regional Medicine Councils (CRMs), the register of the Federal Medicine Council (CFM), the database from the National Committee of Medical Residency, and the database of the Brazilian Medical Association. These databases combine data from all medical specialty societies, and the filing of their information is mandatory for medical practitioners.

We included 7,419 records from physicians who had graduated from FMUSP between 1940 and 2013 and who were 21 to 75 years old. Duplicated or incomplete registry entries were excluded from the present study.

In our analysis, we divided all graduates in 53 medical specialties into the following three main areas:

  1. Internal medicine-based specialties: Acupuncture, Allergy and Immunology, Angiology, Cardiology, Internal Medicine, Dermatology, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Endoscopy, Medical Genetics, Geriatric Medicine, Hematology and Hemotherapy, Homeopathy, Infectious Disease, Family and Community Medicine, Occupational Medicine, Traffic Medicine, Sports Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Intensive Medicine, Legal Medicine, Nuclear Medicine, Social and Preventive Medicine, Neurology, Nutrition, Pathology, Clinical Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Pediatrics, Pneumology, Psychiatry, Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Radiotherapy, Rheumatology;

  2. Surgery-based specialties: Anesthesiology, Cardiovascular Surgery, Hand Surgery, Head and Neck Surgery, Digestive Tract Surgery, General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery, Plastic Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, Vascular Surgery, Neurosurgery;

  3. Both: Cancerology, Coloproctology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mastology, Nephrology, Ophthalmology, Orthopedics and Traumatology, Otorhinolaryngology and Urology.

A review of historical documents, loaned by the Carlos da Silva Lacaz Historical Museum at FMUSP, allowed the collection of the data needed for the analysis of the years included in this study.

As an exploratory analysis, we plotted two Kernel density maps using a qualitative geographic information system open source software (QGis) for MDs who were FMUSP graduates and who were born either inside or outside of São Paulo City. This technique allows us to better visualize the overlap and proximity of the current work locations of the MDs via a color scale and visual analysis. Both maps have the same bandwidth, and their categories have the same breakpoint values to allow a better visual comparison.

This study was part of the “Brazilian Medical Demography: Profile, Distribution, Work and Specialization of Physicians” Project, approved by the FMUSP Ethics in Research Committee (Resolution 797.424 on 09/03/2014).

The authors then analyzed the data obtained, identifying correlations between these data and data from other medical demography studies. All data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods with IBM 24.0 SPSS® software. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


The timeline (Figure 1) shows events in the history of FMUSP that may have directly impacted the formation of the profile of medical students there. It was founded in 1912 as Faculdade de Medicina e Cirurgia de São Paulo. In 1916, it received financial support from São Paulo’s state government and from the Rockefeller Foundation, with the purpose of initiating a new medical school model based on teaching hospitals. In 1944, the Central Institute (IC) of the Hospital das Clínicas (HC) was founded. Today, it is a referral center for complex cases from across Brazil.

Figure 1 Important landmarks in USP Medical School history. Please note that CESCEM is an institution created to select candidates to enter medical schools in the state of São Paulo (Brazil). “Quotas” is used to refer to a Brazilian governmental program of affirmative action. 

There are currently 7,419 physicians who are FMUSP graduates and who are younger than 70 years, accounting for approximately 1.7% of all currently working physicians in Brazil (432,870 in total) in 2015. Since the foundation of FMUSP in 1912 until 1976, the number of graduating MDs has gradually increased each year. Today, 175 students receive a medical degree from FMUSP annually, a number that is approximately 6 times larger than that of the first class in 1918. The demographic data of the FMUSP graduates are presented in Table 1.

Table 1 The statistical description of physicians who graduated from FMUSP and their specialties. The percentages presented correspond to the total number of physicians and the total number of specialists, respectively. 

N* Frequency (%) 95%CI %MD**
Male 5,087 68.6 (67.5-69.7) 57.5
Female 2,332 31.4 (30.3-32.5) 42.5
No specialty 1,537 20.7 (19.8-21.7) 46.4
Internal Medicine-Based 2,921 39.4 (38.3-40.5) 25.9
Surgery-Based 1,243 16.8 (15.5-17.6) 13.5
Both 1,718 23.2 (22.2-24.1) 14.2
Age (Grouped by 5 Years)
≤29 657 8.8 (8.2-9.5) 14.3
30-34 848 11.4 (10.7-12.2) 15.0
35-39 835 11.2 (10.5-12.0) 12.2
40-44 731 9.8 (9.1-10.5) 9.6
45-49 796 10.7 (10.0-11.4) 8.9
50-54 743 10.0 (9.4-10.7) 9.0
55-59 751 10.1 (9.4-10.8) 9.1
60-64 692 9.3 (8.7-10.0) 9.2
65-69 392 5.3 (4.7-5.8) 5.9
≥70 974 13.1 (12.3-13.9) 6.9
Region of Birth
Northern 26 0.4% (0.3-1.3)
Northeastern 93 1.4% (0.9-2.3)
Southeastern 6,476 94.5% (92.4-94.6)
Southern 164 2.4% (2.0-3.1)
Central-western 94 1.4% (1.3-2.3)
Region of Medical Registry
Northern 76 1% (0.2-0.6) 4.4
Northeastern 95 1.3% (0.5-2.4) 17.4
Southeastern 6,934 93.5% (93.0-96.1) 55.3
Southern 185 2.5% (1.8-3.0) 15.0
Central-western 129 1.7% (0.8-2.3) 7.9
Total 7,419 100%

*May be missing data in some dataset variables.

**Distribution in the population-Demografia Médica no Brasil (8).

We can observe that 68.6% of the physicians who have graduated from FMUSP are men. This is significantly different from the general profile of Brazilian physicians, 57.5% of whom are women. However, the proportion of females has grown impressively grown since the founding of FMUSP; it barely rose above 15% in the first 6 decades, reaching 24.5% in the 7th decade, 37.5% on the 8th decade and stabilizing approximately 37% on the following decades.

Concerning the medical specialties chosen by FMUSP graduates, there is a higher percentage of specialists in all areas among FMUSP graduates than among physicians in Brazil as a whole, according to the 2015 Medical Demography database. In total, 1,537 graduates do not have a specialty registered or it was not possible to access it (20.7% of the study group). The specialties with the largest numbers of graduates are General Surgery with 826 physicians (10.4%), Pediatrics with 594 (7.5%), Internal Medicine with 565 (7.1%), Gynecology and Obstetrics with 461 (5.8%), Orthopedics and Traumatology with 451 (5.7%), Psychiatry with 378 (4.8%) and Radiology with 359 (4.5%). According to the Brazilian Medical Demography database, among the specialists, 25.9% are in internal medicine, 13.5% are in surgical areas and 14.2% are in both (internal medicine and surgery-based). Table 2 shows all the specialties in detail.

Table 2 Medical specialties of physicians who graduated from the USP Medical School. 

Specialties N* % %MD** Diff
General Surgery 826 10.4 8.8 1.6
Pediatrics 595 7.5 10.5 -3.0
Internal Medicine 565 7.1 10.6 -3.5
Obstetrics & Gynecology 461 5.8 8.6 -2.8
Orthopedics & Traumatology 451 5.7 4.0 1.7
Psychiatry 378 4.8 2.7 2.1
Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging 359 4.5 2.9 1.6
Anesthesiology 334 4.2 6.3 -2.1
Dermatology 260 3.3 2.0 1.3
Ophthalmology 254 3.2 3.5 -0.3
Cardiology 244 3.1 4.0 -0.9
Otorhinolaryngology 215 2.7 1.7 1.0
Plastic Surgery 202 2.5 1.7 0.8
Urology 177 2.2 1.4 0.8
Intensive Medicine 165 2.1 1.5 0.6
Digestive Tract Surgery 153 1.9 0.7 1.2
Endocrinology and Metabolism 134 1.7 1.3 0.4
Neurology 134 1.7 1.3 0.4
Occupational Medicine 132 1.7 4.0 -2.3
Acupuncture 116 1.5 0.9 0.6
Vascular Surgery 105 1.3 1.0 0.3
Pathology 105 1.3 0.9 0.4
Pneumology 91 1.1 0.9 0.2
Neurosurgery 90 1.1 0.8 0.3
Nephrology 81 1.0 1.1 -0.1
Infectious Diseases 78 1.0 0.9 0.1
Geriatric Medicine 71 0.9 0.4 0.5
Head and Neck Surgery 71 0.9 0.2 0.7
Social and Preventive Medicine 69 0.9 0.5 0.4
Medicine of Traffic 69 0.9 1.1 -0.2
Endoscopy 65 0.8 0.8 0.0
Hematology and Hemotherapy 64 0.8 0.7 0.1
Rheumatology 59 0.7 0.6 0.1
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 58 0.7 0.2 0.5
Family and Community Medicine 54 0.7 1.2 -0.5
Cardiovascular Surgery 50 0.6 0.6 0.0
Cancerology 48 0.6 1.0 -0.4
Clinical Pathology / Laboratory Medicine 47 0.6 0.5 0.1
Gastroenterology 47 0.6 1.3 -0.7
Mastology 45 0.6 0.5 0.1
Hand Surgery 42 0.5 0.1 0.4
Thoracic Surgery 39 0.5 0.2 0.3
Homeopathy 38 0.5 0.7 -0.2
Nuclear Medicine 38 0.5 0.2 0.3
Coloproctology 37 0.5 0.5 0.0
Sports Medicine 37 0.5 0.2 0.3
Allergy & Immunology 35 0.4 0.4 0.0
Nutrition 35 0.4 0.4 0.0
Angiology 34 0.4 0.5 -0.1
Pediatric Surgery 32 0.4 0.3 0.1
Radiotherapy 23 0.3 0.1 0.2
Legal Medicine 15 0.2 0.2 0.0
Medical Genetics 5 0.1 0.0 0.1
7,932 100.0

*The number of specialties is higher than the number of physician because 1 physician can have more than one specialty.

**Distribution in the population - Demografia Médica no Brasil (8).

FMUSP graduates and all Brazilian physicians have similar profiles in terms of the age group distribution of graduates aged 35 years or more. However, it has proportionally fewer young physicians (younger than 35 years old) when compared to national physician population.

Table 3 shows that most of the graduates of FMUSP were born in São Paulo State (83.2%), followed by those born in neighboring states, like Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and Paraná, as seen in Figure 2. In total, 94.5% of the students were born in one of the Southeast States (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais or Espírito Santo), and most of the students were born in São Paulo City, where FMUSP is located. Students who were not born in Brazil account for a very small portion of graduates (0.4%).

Table 3 States where graduates of FMUSP were born and are registered. 

State Birth (n) Percentage Registered (n) Percentage
Acre 3 0.0 6 0.1
Alagoas 6 0.1 9 0.1
Amapá 1 0.0 - -
Amazonas 9 0.1 20 0.3
Bahia 28 0.4 32 0.4
Ceará 16 0.2 31 0.4
Distrito Federal 13 0.2 49 0.7
Espírito Santo 14 0.2 13 0.2
Goiás 34 0.5 22 0.3
Maranhão 7 0.1 2 0.0
Mato Grosso 12 0.2 37 0.5
Mato Grosso do Sul 35 0.5 21 0.3
Minas Gerais 159 2.1 73 1.0
Pará 10 0.1 16 0.2
Paraíba 7 0.1 4 0.1
Paraná 111 1.5 111 1.5
Pernambuco 16 0.2 5 0.1
Piauí 4 0.1 3 0.0
Rio de Janeiro 127 1.7 59 0.8
Rio Grande do Norte 2 0.0 - -
Rio Grande do Sul 37 0.5 10 0.1
Rondônia 3 0.0 18 0.2
Roraima - - 2 0.0
Santa Catarina 16 0.2 64 0.9
São Paulo 6176 83.2 6797 91.5
Sergipe 7 0.1 9 0.1
Tocantins - - 14 0.2
Total 6853 92.3 7427 100

Figure 2 Kernel maps showing the geographic distribution of physicians who graduated from FMUSP. 

The maps in Figure 2 show the geographic distribution of FMUSP graduates across Brazil; the graduates are divided into two groups, namely, those who were born in São Paulo City and those who were born outside of São Paulo City. Another characteristic of FMUSP graduates is the tendency to stay in São Paulo City. While 55.6% were born outside the city, 75.2% of FMUSP graduates practice medicine in São Paulo, resulting in an even larger concentration of medical professionals in the area.


Over the 105 years of its history, FMUSP has occupied an important position in the formation of the Brazilian medical system. Being a pioneer makes it a global model in several areas (7) and one of the main healthcare education centers and the most important research center in the Health Sciences in Brazil (8).

It is curious to note that in the last three decades, the percentage of women at FMUSP has remained approximately 37.5%. This does not reflect Brazilian reality; in recent years, there has been an increasing proportion of female physicians graduating compared to their male counterparts, a proportion that is similar to that found in several medical schools around the world (9). In Brazil, since 2011, female physicians account for the majority of registered physicians (10).

Another noteworthy finding is that among FMUSP graduates, 33.6% do not have any registered medical specialty. This could reflect mainly an inefficiency in updating the database because this information is not mandatory. Furthermore, the average of unregistered specialties is still lower than the national average (46.4%) (6). Therefore, FMUSP still produces more specialists than the average Brazilian medical school. We believe this is related to the fact that the associated teaching hospital is a tertiary center with a concentration of highly complex cases.

The HC is the teaching hospital throughout the 6 years of education for FMUSP students. The hospital includes specialized institutes that focus on highly complex cases. The effect of a highly specialized center on medical training is still unknown. Sierles and Taylos have demonstrated a correlation between medical education and professional choices (11). Career choices directly affect the available medical workforce (12); therefore, it has the potential to affect health policy planning.

There are substantial differences between the most common specialties in several countries, with various conditions linked to historical events in each country studied (13,14). The diversity of career choices can also be linked to all the medical specialties offered by the Hospital das Clínicas (HC) / FMUSP complex, the Medical Residency programs of which are attended by a large part of the institution's alumni.

Moreover, we observed a higher percentage of FMUSP graduates who were specialists compared with the general population of physicians in Brazil. Another interesting finding was the slightly higher prevalence of surgical specialties as the chosen career among FMUSP graduates compared to the national average [16.8% (95% CI 15.5%-17.6) versus 13.5%]. We believe that is related to the international recognition of and pioneering work performed by our institution’s surgical groups (7).

It is notable, however, that a low percentage of our MDs go on to work in areas such as Family Medicine, Pediatrics and Obstetrics and Gynecology, which are essential to primary care and have direct impacts on public policy. We believe that these choices are related to the tertiary hospital in which the students practice and that this model is essential for wellbeing of the nation. Although FMUSP does not generate as many primary care physicians, it educates highly specialized individuals who are also important for the development of health care in Brazil. However, few studies have compared the level of the teaching hospital with the choices of specialties made by graduates.

In addition, the Kernel map shows one more interesting feature of FMUSP graduates; the students who come from other cities outside of São Paulo City tend to stay in São Paulo more often than do those who were born in the city. This phenomenon is shown in Table 4 and could be related to factors such as the greater size of the population (meaning that there would be a larger pool of patients for their chosen specialty), more modern technological resources, a known network, a larger number of hospitals and activity fields, as well as the possibility of maintaining a bond with the university (15,16). This disparity in the distribution of graduates agrees with the high percentage of physicians in São Paulo City, which has 23.7% of all physicians in the Southeast Region and 12.7% of all physicians in Brazil.

Table 4 Analysis of professionals who were born in São Paulo (city) versus those who are born outside São Paulo (city). 

Chi-square <0.001 Born inside São Paulo (city) Born outside São Paulo (city) Total
Live in São Paulo (city) Count 1999 3396 5395
% Table 27.9% 47.3% 75.2%
% Column 62.7% 85.1%
Remainder -5.52% 5.52%
Live outside São Paulo (city) Count 1187 595 1782
% Table 16.5% 8.3% 24.8%
% Column 37.3% 14.9%
Remainder 5.52% -5.52%
Total Count 3186 3991 7177
% Table 44.4% 55.6% 100%

In 2013, the “Mais Médicos” law was promulgated in Brazil (law 12.871 on October 22, 2013), which stimulates the creation of new medical schools to provide more physicians for the Brazilian population. The law was highly criticized, with many suggesting that the focus should be on a better distribution of the existing physicians rather than on the training of additional physicians. The attachment of our students to the university’s city, as previously observed by other authors, supports the critics of this law, as most of the new medical schools were created in the São Paulo region, whereas regions with fewer physicians per inhabitant such as Maranhão e Pará gained no new medical schools (17,18). It is our belief, therefore, that the law only contributes to a less equal distribution of Brazilian physicians.


We believe that the characteristics of FMUSP may guide decisions related to public health and educational policies. The analysis of the century-long experience of FMUSP and its graduates allow us to make predictions about the outcomes of actions directed at improving public health.

As FMUSP has recently adopted affirmative action and racial quotas, we believe that our student profile will undergo even greater changes in the future. However, we believe that FMUSP remains an interesting model for the impact of a highly specialized center on the education and choices of medical students.


Since this study is based on secondary data from different databases that are not always updated, it is expected that some data may be missing. Nevertheless, it was possible to determine a profile of the professionals who graduated from one of the largest medical education centers in Latin America, including their specialization. The database used in this study is, to the best of our knowledge, the best register of medical professionals in our country. In the future, these data could help establish health policy to foster medical education and to foment discussions on this topic.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the Historical Museum of FMUSP for the assistance given by providing documents regarding the organization since its foundation. We would like to thank the former dean, Professor José Otavio Costa Auler Jr, and the current dean of the USP Medical School, Professor Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho for the support and establishing a permanent program to follow the USP Medical School alumni.


1. Raia S, Nery JR, Mies S. Liver transplantation from live donors. Lancet. 1989;2(8661): 497. [ Links ]

2. Jatene AD, Fontes VF, Paulista PP, Souza LC, Neger F, Galantier M, et al. Anatomic correction of transposition of the great vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1976;72(3):364-70. [ Links ]

3. Ejzenberg D, Andraus W, Baratelli Carelli Mendes LR, Ducatti L, Song A, Tanigawa R, et al. Livebirth after uterus transplantation from a deceased donor in a recipient with uterine infertility. Lancet. 2019;392(10165):2697-704. [ Links ]

4. Rankings QWU. QS World University Ranking 2018. Available from: [ Links ]

5. Scheffer MC, Dal Poz MR. The privatization of medical education in Brazil: trends and challenges. Hum Resour Health. 2015;13:96. [ Links ]

6. Scheffer M. Demografia Médica no Brasil 2018. São Paulo, SP: FMUSP, CFM, Cremesp, 2018. p. 286. [ Links ]

7. Heldwein FL, Hartmann AA, Kalil AN, Neves BV, Ratti GS, Beber MC Jr, et al. Cited Brazilian papers in general surgery between 1970 and 2009. Clinics. 2010;65(5):521-9. [ Links ]

8. (THE) THE. World University Rankings 2019 by subject: clinical. pre-clinical and health. Available from:!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats [Accessed August 2019]. [ Links ]

9. Denekens JP. The impact of feminisation on general practice. Acta Clin Belg. 2002;57(1):5-10. [ Links ]

10. Scheffer MC, Cassenote AJ. A feminização da medicina no Brasil. Rev Bioet. 2013;21(2):268-77. [ Links ]

11. Sierles FS, Taylor MA. Decline of U.S. medical student career choice of psychiatry and what to do about it. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(10):1416-26. [ Links ]

12. Khader Y, Al-Zoubi D, Amarin Z, Alkafagei A, Khasawneh M, Burgan S, et al. Factors affecting medical students in formulating their specialty preferences in Jordan. BMC Med Educ. 2008;8:32. [ Links ]

13. Biggs JS. Postgraduate medical training in Pakistan: observations and recommendations. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008;18(1):58-63. [ Links ]

14. Ossai EN, Uwakwe KA, Anyanwagu UC, Ibiok NC, Azuogu BN, Ekeke N. Specialty preferences among final year medical students in medical schools of southeast Nigeria: need for career guidance. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16(1):259. [ Links ]

15. Purim KS, Borges Lde M, Possebom AC. Profile of the newly graduated physicians in southern Brazil and their professional insertion. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2016;43(4):295-300. [ Links ]

16. Sierles FS, Dinwiddie SH, Patroi D, Atre-Vaidya N, Schrift MJ, Woodard JL. Factors affecting medical student career choice of psychiatry from 1999 to 2001. Acad Psychiatry. 2003;27(4):260-8. [ Links ]

17. Cassenote AJ, Scheffer MC, Segurado AA. Brazilian infectious diseases specialists: who and where are they? Braz J Infect Dis. 2016;20(2):141-8. [ Links ]

18. Ezequiel ODS, Lucchetti G, Lucchetti ALG, Senger MH, Braga L, Lacerda R, et al. Geographical distribution of medical graduates from a public university. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2017;63(6):512-20. [ Links ]

Received: January 6, 2019; Accepted: July 16, 2019

*Corresponding author. E-mail:

No potential conflict of interest was reported.


Gameiro GR, Koyama LKS, Cruz ALIB and Cassenote AJF contributed to the manuscript conception and design, literature review, statistical analysis, manuscript drafting, critical revision and final approval. Guilloux AGA contributed to the statistical analysis and manuscript final approval. Segurado AAC and Scheffer MC contributed to the manuscript conception and design, manuscript critical revision and final approval.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.