Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Insecticide effects of Ruta graveolens, Copaifera langsdorffii and Chenopodium ambrosioides against pests and natural enemies in commercial tomato plantation

Ação inseticida de Ruta graveolens, Copaifera langsdorffii e Chenopodium ambrosioides sobre pragas de tomate

Abstracts

The aim of this study was to evaluate the insecticide effect of watery leaf extracts of Ruta graveolens (Rutaceae), alcoholic leaf extracts of Copaifera langsdorffii (Caesalpinaceae) and Chenopodium ambrosioides (Chenopodiaceae) in the concentration of 5% under field conditions. The experiment design was randomized blocks with six replications. The parcels treated with plant extracts showed reduction in the population of pests when compared with the control parcels. The extract elaborated with C. langsdorffii presented greater insecticidal effect under Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and sum of pests. It was verified that after 24 hours of spraying, the parcels treated with the extract of C. ambrosioides presented minor numbers of adults of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), followed by the parcels treated with extract of R. graveolens. There were smaller numbers of parasitoid eggs of lepidopterans Trichogramma sp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and sum of natural enemies (predators + parasitoids) in the parcels that had received spraying with extracts from the plants of C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides, followed by R. graveolens, compared to the control. There were a smaller number of parasitoids from the family Eulophidae (Hymenoptera) attacking caterpillars of T. absoluta in plants treated with R. graveolens, followed by C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides than in the control.

Lycopersicon esculentum; bioinsecticide; alternative control


O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito inseticida dos extratos aquosos de folhas de Ruta graveolens (Rutaceae) e alcoólicos de folhas de Copaifera langsdorffii (Caesalpinaceae) e de folhas de Chenopodium ambrosioides (Chenopodiaceae) a 5%. O experimento foi em blocos casualizados com seis repetições. As parcelas tratadas tiveram redução na população de pragas, quando comparadas às parcelas sem nenhum tratamento. O extrato elaborado com C. langsdorffii apresentou maior efeito inseticida em Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) e soma das pragas. Verificou-se que após 24h de pulverização, as parcelas tratadas com o extrato de C. ambrosioides apresentaram menores números de adultos de Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) seguido pelas parcelas tratadas com extrato de R. graveolens. Foram observados menores números do parasitoide de ovos de lepidópteros Trichogramma sp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) e da soma dos inimigos naturais (predadores + parasitoides) nos tratamentos que receberam as pulverizações com os extratos das plantas de C. langsdorffii e C. ambrosioides seguido por R. graveolens do que na testemunha; do parasitoide da família Eulophidae (Hymenoptera), que atacam lagartas de T. Absoluta em plantas tratadas com R. graveolens, seguido por C. langsdorffii e C. ambrosioides do que na testemunha.

Lycopersicon esculentum; bioinseticida; controle alternativo


CROP PROTECTION

Insecticide effects of Ruta graveolens, Copaifera langsdorffii and Chenopodium ambrosioides against pests and natural enemies in commercial tomato plantation

Ação inseticida de Ruta graveolens, Copaifera langsdorffii e Chenopodium ambrosioides sobre pragas de tomate

Flávia Silva Barbosa; Germano Leão Demolin Leite* * Author for correspondence. E-mail: gldleite@ufmg.br ; Sérgio Monteze Alves; Aline Fonseca Nascimento; Vinícius de Abreu D'Ávila; Cândido Alves da Costa

Instituto de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Universitária 1000, Cx. Postal 135, 39404-006, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais, Brazil

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the insecticide effect of watery leaf extracts of Ruta graveolens (Rutaceae), alcoholic leaf extracts of Copaifera langsdorffii (Caesalpinaceae) and Chenopodium ambrosioides (Chenopodiaceae) in the concentration of 5% under field conditions. The experiment design was randomized blocks with six replications. The parcels treated with plant extracts showed reduction in the population of pests when compared with the control parcels. The extract elaborated with C. langsdorffii presented greater insecticidal effect under Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and sum of pests. It was verified that after 24 hours of spraying, the parcels treated with the extract of C. ambrosioides presented minor numbers of adults of Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), followed by the parcels treated with extract of R. graveolens. There were smaller numbers of parasitoid eggs of lepidopterans Trichogramma sp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) and sum of natural enemies (predators + parasitoids) in the parcels that had received spraying with extracts from the plants of C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides, followed by R. graveolens, compared to the control. There were a smaller number of parasitoids from the family Eulophidae (Hymenoptera) attacking caterpillars of T. absoluta in plants treated with R. graveolens, followed by C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides than in the control.

Keywords:Lycopersicon esculentum, bioinsecticide, alternative control.

RESUMO

O objetivo deste trabalho foi avaliar o efeito inseticida dos extratos aquosos de folhas de Ruta graveolens (Rutaceae) e alcoólicos de folhas de Copaifera langsdorffii (Caesalpinaceae) e de folhas de Chenopodium ambrosioides (Chenopodiaceae) a 5%. O experimento foi em blocos casualizados com seis repetições. As parcelas tratadas tiveram redução na população de pragas, quando comparadas às parcelas sem nenhum tratamento. O extrato elaborado com C. langsdorffii apresentou maior efeito inseticida em Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) e soma das pragas. Verificou-se que após 24h de pulverização, as parcelas tratadas com o extrato de C. ambrosioides apresentaram menores números de adultos de Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) seguido pelas parcelas tratadas com extrato de R. graveolens. Foram observados menores números do parasitoide de ovos de lepidópteros Trichogramma sp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) e da soma dos inimigos naturais (predadores + parasitoides) nos tratamentos que receberam as pulverizações com os extratos das plantas de C. langsdorffii e C. ambrosioides seguido por R. graveolens do que na testemunha; do parasitoide da família Eulophidae (Hymenoptera), que atacam lagartas de T. Absoluta em plantas tratadas com R. graveolens, seguido por C. langsdorffii e C. ambrosioides do que na testemunha.

Palavras-chave:Lycopersicon esculentum, bioinseticida, controle alternativo.

Introduction

Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. (Solanaceae) is one of the most important vegetables cultivated in the world, with regard to area as well as commercial value, being the second most produced vegetable in Brazil. The tomato is considered one of the few cultures for which pests and diseases are equally important, being a host plant to about 200 species of arthropods (CARVALHO et al., 2002).

Among the pests of tomato plants are the transmitters of viral diseases Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae), Frankliniella schulzei Trybom (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), Myzus persicae Sulzer and Macrosiphum euphorbiae Thomas (Hemiptera: Aphididae), leaf miners Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) and Liriomyza huidobrensis Blanchard (Diptera: Agromyzidae), and fruit borers T. absoluta, Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenée (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) and Helicoverpa zea Bod. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) (GALLO et al., 2002). They can provoke high losses in tomato production, as verified by Picanço et al. (2007), in which some of these pests are capable of causing, directly or indirectly, a reduction of 58.39% in total income of culture.

For the control of these pests, successive applications of synthetic insecticides are used. This is undesirable due to elevated production costs, exposure of producers and consumers to harmful active ingredients, adverse effects on the environment, reduction of natural enemies, and selection of resistant individuals in the pest populations (THOMAZINI et al., 2000).

Therefore, there is a need to control pests without causing aggressions and unbalances in the environment through the search of alternative methods of pest control that favor the natural enemies that are indispensable to establish the biological balance and to reduce production costs, such as with the use of plant extracts (VIEGAS JÚNIOR, 2003). Thus, organic cultivation, since it uses environmentally safe technologies, constitutes a promising alternative (VENZON et al., 2006). Organic agricultural production seeks to maximize the social benefits, self-sustainment, the reduction or elimination of the dependence on inputs, nonrenewable energy and preservation of the environment through optimization of the use of natural and socioeconomic resources available in a maintainable and rational way (HAMERSCHMIDT et al., 2000; PENTEADO, 2000).

Problems such as selectivity to natural enemies, persistence to the environment and toxicity to mammals can be minimized by the use of insecticide plants as an alternative method of suppression of the herbivore (VIEGAS JÚNIOR, 2003; TREVISAN et al., 2006). Barbosa et al. (2009) studied different extraction methods and concentrations of tree plants. This author observed satisfactory mortality of aqueous leaf extracts of Ruta graveolens L. (Rutaceae) and Artemisia verlotorum Lamotte (Asteraceae), alcoholic leaf extracts of Petiveria alliacea L. (Phytolaccaceae) against Diabrotica speciosa (Germar) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in laboratory conditions. However, it is necessary to evaluate the insecticide effect of those extracts on other pests found, the impact on natural enemies, and the persistence of those extracts after some time exposed to field conditions, as the natural enemies promote efficient biocontrol of pests and favor greater productivity of the culture by means of effect cascades (CARDINALE et al., 2003).

The objective of this work is to evaluate the insecticide effect of aqueous leaf extracts of R. graveolens and alcoholic leaf extracts of C. Langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides against pests and natural enemies in commercial plantations of L. esculentum.

Material and methods

The experiment was carried in the city of Montes Claros, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, in April 2007. The analysis was accomplished in a commercial plantation of L. esculentum var. Santa Clara, cultivated in Red-Yellow Latosol, with four months of planting, and trellised obliquely. The last pulverization with organosynthetic pesticides had been done three weeks before.

The experimental block design was randomized, with six replications and four treatments. Each plot had five rows with 25 plants per rows. The 15 central plants of the medium row were used for data collection. The plants were spaced 0.50 m apart within rows and 1.0 m between rows. The treatments were: 1) control without pulverization, 2) alcoholic leaf extract of C. langsdorffii, 3) alcoholic leaf extract of C. Ambrosioides, and 4) aqueous leaf extract of R. graveolens. The extracts were used in a dilution of 5%. Due to this dosage, Barbosa et al. (2009) observed insecticide effect in D. speciosa in R. graveolens, and another two plants by preliminary testing.

The R. graveolens and C. ambrosioides plants were organically cultivated at the Horto Medicinal of ICA/UFMG, while C. langsdorffii adult trees, present at the campus, in dystrophic Red Latosol of average texture.

To obtain the aqueous leaf extract of R. graveolens with three months of age (reproductive phase), 200 g of fresh leaves plus 1 L of distilled water were used. It was triturated in an industrial blender until homogenization. Soon afterwards, the mixture was heated until the beginning of ebullition. The mixture was then left to cool down, filtered and stored in a tinted glass until use. To obtain the alcoholic extracts elaborated with leaves of C. langsdorffii, unkown age (reproductive phase), and C. Ambrosioides, with three months of age (reproductive phase), 250 g of fresh leaves of each plant plus 1 L of hydrated commercial ethyl alcohol were used. The leaves were cut in small pieces and put in tinted glass flasks. The alcohol was then added and the mixture was then briefly agitated twice a day for 15 days. After this period, the solution was filtered and stored in tinted glass flasks until application.

The insecticide effect of the plant extracts was verified 24 and 72 hours after application by evaluating the number of pests, natural enemies (predators and parasitoids) and ants in 15 plants per plot, using the beating tray method (MIRANDA et al., 1998).

This method consists of beating the first apical expanded leaf inside a 34 x 26 x 5 cm white tray and counting the insects inside. The number of mines of T. absoluta and Liriomyza sp. were evaluated by direct counting in the first expanded leaf of 15 plants per plot (PICANÇO et al., 1998).

To evaluate the possible effect of the extracts on the parasitoid of eggs Trichogramma sp. (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) by natural infestation in the field, two white cards (12.0 x 3.0 cm) with 3,500 eggs of Ephestia kuehniella Zell. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), not parasitized, were put in the apical part of the canopy height (1.6 m height) of tomato plants. In the plots that were sprayed with extracts, a pulverization jet was driven on the cards. After 72 hours, the cards were collected off the field, stored in transparent white plastic bags, sealed and transported to the laboratory. Rearing took place in an incubator at a constant temperature of 25ºC. After 15 days, the cards were evaluated with a 40x magnifying lens, counting the number of adults of Trichogramma sp. emerged from the parasitized eggs, number of eggs predated, eggs parasitized by Trichogramma sp. not emerged, eggs not parasitized and total eggs in the cards.

Field and laboratory data were transformed by and arcsin, respectively, and later submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey test (p < 0.05).

Results and discussion

The smallest number of B. tabaci adults, mines of T. absoluta and sum of pests (sum of total pests found) was observed in the treatments that had received the extracts of C. langsdorffii, C. ambrosioides and R. graveolens and T. absoluta adults in the plants sprayed with C. ambrosioides and R. graveolens extracts after 24 hours spraying (Table 1). There were no significant effects (p > 0.05) 24 hours after spraying in F. schulzei (Table 1). 72 hours after spraying, a smaller number of B. tabaci adults were observed on the tomato plants treated with C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides than on the plants treated with R. graveolens and in the control group (Table 1). A smaller number of F. schulzei was noted in Table 1.

The control group, followed by the plants that had received treatments with the extracts of C. ambrosioides, C. langsdorffii and R. graveolens (Table 1). A smaller number of the sum of pests was observed in the tomato plants sprayed with C. langsdorffii, followed by C. ambrosioides, R. graveolens and the control group (Table 1). There were no significant effects (p > 0.05) noted in the number of mines and adults of T. absoluta (Table 1).

Other pests found were observed, however, apparently not affected by the pulverizations separately (not sum of pests), such as Diabrotica speciosa (0.35 ± 0.02/tray) (Germar) and Cerotoma sp. (0.0036 ± 0.0019/tray) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae); M. persicae and M. euphorbiae (0.02 ± 0.01/tray) (Aphididae), Empoasca sp. (0.03 ± 0.01/tray) (Cicadellidae), Pentatomidae (0.01 ± 0.01/tray); Miridae (0.001 ± 0.001/tray); caterpillars of Noctuidae (0.05 ± 0.04/tray) and Geometridae (0.0013 ± 0.0013/tray) and Liriomyza sp. adults (Diptera: Agromyzidae) (0.008 ± 0.003/tray).

The insecticide effect on C. langsdorffii extract in this work is probably due to the presence of coumarin in their constitution (VEIGA JUNIOR; PINTO, 2002), showing effect against Aedes aegypti L. larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) (CHAITHONG et al., 2006).

The insecticide action of the plant C. ambrosioides that occurred in this study is probably the result of the flavonoids and terpenoids present in its structure (CRUZ et al., 2007). Silva et al. (2005) verified that 1.0 and 2.0% (p/p) concentrations of the C. ambrosioides extracts showed satisfactory insecticide effect against Sitophilus zeamais Mots. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). They achieved 90.3 and 90.1% mortality, respectively.

The R. graveolens plants have glycosides (rutin), aromatic lactones (coumarin, bergapten, xantotoxine, rutaretine and rutamarine), anthocyanins glycosides, alkaloids (rutamine, rutalidine, cocusaginine, esquiamianine and ribalinidine), methyl ketones (methylnonil ketone and methyheptil ketone), flavonoids (hesperidine), rutaline, rutacridone and terpenes (a-pinene, limonene, cineole) (MARTINS et al., 2005). These compounds are probably responsible for insecticide effects on S. zeamais (ALMEIDA et al., 1999), Ctenocephalides canis Curtis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae) (LEITE et al., 2006) and D. speciosa (BARBOSA et al., 2009) as well as on several pests observed in the tomato plants in field conditions in this work.

Aqueous leaf-branch extracts of Trichilia pallida Swartz (Meliaceae) presented harmful effects on the development of T. absoluta (THOMAZINI et al., 2000) and aqueous extracts of Prosopis juliflora (S.w.) D.C. and Leucaena leucocephala Wit. (Leguminoseae) in variable concentrations between 3 and 10%, provoking mortality and alterations in the fertility parameters of B. tabaci (CAVALCANTE et al., 2006), therefore proving efficiency of vegetable extracts as easy elaboration in the suppression of important pests in tomato plantations.

After 24 hours a smaller number of adults of Trichogramma sp. and sum of natural enemies (predators + parasitoids) per tray were observed on the tomato plants that had been sprayed with the extracts of C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides than on the plants that had been treated with R. graveolens and the control group (Table 2). A smaller number of Eulophidae (Hymenoptera, parasitoid of T. absoluta caterpillars) was noted on tomato plants sprayed with the extract of R. graveolens than on the ones that had been treated with C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides and the control (Table 2). A smaller number of sum of parasitoids than in the control was observed in the plots sprayed with the extracts studied (Table 2). On the other hand, a higher number of Syrphus sp. larvae (Diptera: Syrphidae, predators of aphids) than in the other treatments was noted on the tomato plants that had received the extracts of R. graveolens (Table 2). A higher number of sum of ants, basically Crematogaster sp. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), than the other treatments was observed on the plants sprayed with extract of C. langsdorffii, followed by the control group (Table 2).

However, after 72 hours, significant effects were detected on Chrysoperla sp. larvae (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae, predator of aphids, nymphs of whitefly and eggs of lepidopterous), observing larger numbers on sprayed tomato plants with C. langsdorffii extracts (Table 2). No significant effects (p > 0.05) were observed in the sum of predators after 24 hours as well as after 72 hours like Carabidae (Coleoptera) (0.26 ± 0.02/tray), Orius sp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) (0.05 ± 0.01/tray), Vespidae (Hymenoptera) (0.03 ± 0.01/tray) and spiders (0.28 ± 0.02/tray) as well as in parasitoids like Encarsia sp. (Aphelinidae) (0.01 ± 0.001/tray) and the parasitoid not identified (0.38 ± 0.03/tray) (Hymenoptera).

A higher number of eggs of E. kuehniella, parasitized and not emerged per total eggs, was observed in cards sprayed with C. langsdorffii extract, demonstrating a possible insecticide effect of this extract when compared with the extracts of C. ambrosioides, R. graveolens and control, as well as no preference of insect predators and parasitoids in the cards treated with C. langsdorffii (Table 3). It was verified that the cards with eggs of E. kuehniella, sprayed with the extract of the plant R. graveolens, presented a larger residual insecticide effect.

There was a larger number of parasitized eggs and without emergence of parasitized eggs, with approximately 75% of embryos dead, with a smaller number of Trichogramma sp. emerged compared with C. langsdorffii, C. ambrosioides and the control group (Table 3).

It is probable that the spots treated with C. langsdorffii extract presented selectivity to ants, and the spots treated with R. graveolens presented selectivity to Syrphidae in function of the dose and formulation of the extracts used, because the effect of the botanical insecticides on insects is variable (MOREIRA et al., 2006).

Works regarding alternative control of insects through vegetable extracts focus on their compatibility with other management tactics, mainly with biological control. However, the answers found in this experiment for low selectivity of the extract of R. graveolens and C. langsdorfii on insects of the genus Trichogramma were verified by Raguram and Singh (1999) and Reddy and Manjunatha (2000) by testing the insecticide effect of Azadirachta indicates A. Juss on natural enemies. Carvalho et al. (2001) studied the insecticide effect of commercial products used mainly in tomato plantations on T. pretiosum.

They verified, under laboratory conditions, that the chemicals clorfluazuron, teflubenzuron, triflumuron, cyromazine, benomyl, chlorothalonil, mancozeb, iprodione, dimetomorf, tebufenozide and pirimicarb were selective to the two lineages of T. pretiosum, as well as the biological commercial product Bacillus thuringiensis, reaching a mortality of up to 30%. However, it is known that those synthetic chemicals remain for a longer time in the environment than natural insecticides - a fact that should be considered at the moment of choosing the product to be applied, as well as the best application time.

Conclusion

We conclude that the extract from C. langsdorffii presents insecticide action after 24 hours and maintains a good residual effect until 72 hours after application. C. langsdorffii has a greater insecticide effect on natural enemies than C. ambrosioides and R. graveolens. The extract elaborated with R. graveolens shows to be more selective to natural enemies than C. langsdorffii and C. ambrosioides.

Acknowledgments

To Capes, CNPq and Fapemig for research support, and Maria de Fátima Prates for using her commercial tomato plantation.

Received on November 29, 2008.

Accepted on April 10, 2009.

License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • ALMEIDA, F. A. C.; GOLDFARB, A. C.; GOUVEIA, J. P. G. Avaliação de extratos vegetais e métodos de aplicação no controle de Sitophilus spp . Revista Brasileira de Produtos Agroindustriais, v. 1, n. 1, p. 13-20, 1999.
  • BARBOSA, S. L.; LEITE, G. L. D.; MARTINS, E. R.; GUANABENS, R. E. M.; SILVA, F. W. S. Métodos de extração e concentrações no efeito inseticida de Ruta graveolens L., Artemisia verlotorum Lamotte e Petiveria alliacea L. a Diabrotica speciosa Germar. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, v. 11, n. 3, p. 221-229, 2009.
  • CARDINALE, B. J.; HARVEY, C. T.; GROSS, K.; IVES, A. R. Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergent impacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem. Ecology Letters, v. 6, n. 9, p. 857-865, 2003.
  • CARVALHO, G. A.; PARRA, J. R. P.; BAPTISTA, G. C. Seletividade de alguns produtos fitossanitários a duas linhagens de Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 25, n. 3, p. 583-591, 2001.
  • CARVALHO, G. A.; REIS, P. R.; MORAES, J. C.; FUINI, L. C.; ROCHA, L. C. D.; GOUSSAIN, M. M. Efeitos de alguns inseticidas utilizados na cultura do tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) a Trichogramma pretiosum Riley, 1879 (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Ciência e Agrotecnologia, v. 26, n. 6, p. 1160-1166, 2002.
  • CAVALCANTE, G. M.; MOREIRA, A. F. C.; VASCONCELOS, S. D. Potencialidade inseticida de extratos aquosos de essências florestais sobre moscabranca. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 41, n. 1, p. 9-14, 2006.
  • CHAITHONG, U.; CHOOCHOTE, W.; KAMSUK, K.; JITPAKDI, A.; TIPPAWANGKOSOL, P.; CHAIYASIT, D.; CHAMPAKAEW, D.; TUETUN, B.; PITASAWAT, B. Larvicidal effect of pepper plants on Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of Vector Ecology, v. 31, n. 1, p. 138-144, 2006.
  • CRUZ, G. V. B.; PEREIRA, P. V. S.; PATRÍCIO, F. J.; COSTA, G. C.; SOUSA, S. M.; FRAZÃO, J. B.; ARAGÃO-FILHO, W. C.; MACIEL, M. C. G.; SILVA, L. A.; AMARAL, F. M. M.; BARROQUEIRO, E. S. B.; GUERRA, R. N. M.; NASCIMENTO, F. R. F. Increase of cellular recruitment, phagocytosis ability and nitric oxide production induced by hydroalcoholic extract from Chenopodium ambrosioides leaves. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, v. 111, n. 1, p. 148-154, 2007.
  • GALLO, D.; NAKANO, O.; SILVEIRA NETO, S.; CARVALHO, R. P. L.; BAPTISTA, G. C.; BERTI FILHO, E.; PARRA, J. R. P.; ZUCCHI, R. A.; ALVES, S. B.; VENDRAMIM, J. D.; MARCHINI, L. C.; LOPES, J. R. S.; OMOTO, C. Entomologia agrícola Piracicaba: Fealq, 2002.
  • HAMERSCHMIDT, I.; SILVA, J. C. B. V.; LIZARELLI, P. H. Agricultura orgânica Curitiba: Emater, 2000.
  • LEITE, G. L. D.; SANTOS, M. M. O.; GUANABENS, R. E. M.; SILVA, F. W. S.; REDOAN, A. C. M. Efeito de boldo chinês, do sabão de côco e da cipermetrina na mortalidade de pulgas em cachorro doméstico. Revista Brasileira de Plantas Medicinais, v. 8, n. 3, p. 96-98, 2006.
  • MARTINS, A. G.; ROSÁRIO, D. L.; BARROS, M. N.; JARDIM, M. A.G. Levantamento etnobotânico de plantas medicinais, alimentares e tóxicas da Ilha do Combu, Município de Belém, Estado do Pará, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Farmácia, v. 86, n. 1, p. 21-30, 2005.
  • MIRANDA, M. M. M.; PICANÇO, M.; LEITE, G. L. D.; ZANUNCIO, J. C.; CLERCQ, P. Sampling and nonaction levels for predators and parasitoids of virus vectors and leaf miners of tomato plants in Brazil. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwwetenschappe Universiteit Gent, v. 63, n. 1, p. 519-523, 1998.
  • MOREIRA, M. D.; PICANÇO, M. C.; SILVA, M. E.; MORENO, S. C.; MARTINS, J. C. Uso de inseticidas botânicos no controle de pragas. In: VENZON, M.; PAULA JÚNIOR, T. J.; PALLINI, A. (Ed.). Controle alternativo de pragas e doenças Viçosa: Epamig/CTZM, 2006. p. 89-120.
  • PENTEADO, S. R. Introdução à agricultura orgânica: normas e técnicas de cultivo. Campinas: Grafimagem, 2000.
  • PICANÇO, M. C.; BACCI, L.; CRESPO, A. L. B.; MIRANDA, M. M. M.; MARTINS, J. C. Effect of integrated pest management practices on tomato production and conservation of natural enemies. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, v. 9, n. 4, p. 327-335, 2007.
  • PICANÇO, M.; LEITE, G. L. D.; GUEDES, R. N. C.; SILVA, E. E. A. Yield loss in trellised tomato affected by insecticidal sprays and plant spacing. Crop Protection, v. 17, n. 5, p. 447-452, 1998.
  • RAGURAN, S.; SINGH. R. P. Biological effects of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed on an egg parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis Journal of Economic Entomology, v. 92, n. 6, p. 1274-1280, 1999.
  • REDDY, G. V. P.; MANJUNATHA, M. Laboratory and field studies on the integrated pest management of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in cotton, based on pheromone trap catch threshold level. Journal of Applied Entomology, v. 124, n. 5, p. 213-221, 2000.
  • SILVA, G.; ORREGO, O.; HEPP, R.; TAPIA, M. Búsqueda de plantas con propiedades insecticidas para el controlde Sitophilus zeamais en maíz almacenado. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v. 40, n. 1, p. 11-17, 2005.
  • THOMAZINI, A. P. B. W.; VENDRAMIM, J. D.; LOPES, M. T. R. Extratos aquosos de Trichilia pallida e a traça-do-tomateiro. Scientia Agricola, v. 57, n. 1, p. 13-17, 2000.
  • TREVISAN, M. T. S; BEZERRA, M. Z. B.; SANTIAGO, G. M. P.; FEITOSA, C. M. F. Atividades larvicida e anticolinesterásica de plantas do gênero Kalanchoe Química Nova, v. 29, n. 3, p. 415-418, 2006.
  • VEIGA JÚNIOR, V. F.; PINTO, A. C. O gênero Copaifera L. Química Nova, v. 25, n. 2, p. 273-286, 2002.
  • VIEGAS JÚNIOR, C. Terpenos com atividade inseticida: uma alternativa para o controle químico de insetos. Química Nova, v. 26, n. 3, p. 390-400, 2003.
  • VENZON, M.; TUELHER, E. S.; BONOMO, I. S.; TINOCO, R. S.; FONSECA, M. C. M.; PALLINI, A. Potencial de defensivos alternativos para o controle de pragas do cafeeiro. In: VENZON, M.; PAULA JÚNIOR, T. J.; PALLINI, A. (Ed.). Tecnologias alternativas para o controle de pragas e doenças Viçosa: Epamig/CTZM, 2006. p.117-136.
  • *
    Author for correspondence. E-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      28 Apr 2011
    • Date of issue
      Mar 2011

    History

    • Received
      29 Nov 2008
    • Accepted
      10 Apr 2009
    Editora da Universidade Estadual de Maringá - EDUEM Av. Colombo, 5790, bloco 40, 87020-900 - Maringá PR/ Brasil, Tel.: (55 44) 3011-4253, Fax: (55 44) 3011-1392 - Maringá - PR - Brazil
    E-mail: actaagron@uem.br