Digestible lysine levels for laying hens and their effects on egg quality

Níveis de lisina digestível para poedeiras semipesadas e seus efeitos sobre a qualidade dos ovos

NONRUMINANT NUTRITION

Digestible lysine levels for laying hens and their effects on egg quality

Níveis de lisina digestível para poedeiras semipesadas e seus efeitos sobre a qualidade dos ovos

Tiago Antônio dos Santos^I,*; Adriano Geraldo^I; Luiz Carlos Machado^I; Kléber Pelícia^II; Sérgio Domingos Simão^I; Javer Alves Vieira Filho^III

^IDepartamento de Zootecnia, Instituto Federal de Educação Ciência e Tecnologia de Minas Gerais, Fazenda Varginha, Rod. Bambuí Medeiros, km 5, Cx. Postal 5, 38900-000, Bambuí, Minas Gerais, Brazil

^IIDepartamento de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade José do Rosário Vellano, Fundação de Ensino e Tecnologia de Alfenas, Alfenas, Minas Gerais, Brazil

^IIIDepartamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil

ABSTRACT

Egg quality of semi-heavy laying hens fed on low protein diets (14.0% CP) and on different lysine levels is evaluated, while maintaining the same ratio of digestible amino acids / digestible lysine. Four hundred and twenty commercial strain Isa Brown laying hens, 28 weeks old, were divided into 42 experimental plots. A completely randomized design with six treatments and seven replicates was employed in four production cycles of 28 days each. Treatments comprised Control - 16.92% CP; 0.750% digestible lysine. Treatments 1 to 5, with CP levels 14% and digestible lysine levels 0.600, 0.675, 0.750, 0.825 and 0.900% respectively. Levels of Treatments 1 and 2 (0.546 and 0.640% digestible Met + Cys / 0.600 and 0.675% digestible lysine) provided smaller egg size. On the other hand, eggs had higher shell percentage when compared to control diet. When compared to other digestible amino acids, digestible lysine requirement may be estimated at 0.750% in a diet with 14% CP, which corresponds to the average daily intake of 876 mg dig. lysine hen^-1 day^-1 and 798 mg dig. Met + Cys hen^-1 day^-1, without jeopardizing performance and eggs' internal and external quality.

Keywords: ideal protein, digestible amino acids, Isa Brown, requirement, diet.

RESUMO

A presente pesquisa objetivou avaliar a qualidade dos ovos de poedeiras semipesadas submetidas a dietas com baixa proteína (14,0% PB) e diferentes níveis de lisina, mantendo a mesma relação aminoácidos digestíveis/lisina digestível. Foram utilizadas 420 poedeiras da linhagem comercial Isa Brown, com 28 semanas de idade distribuídas em 42 parcelas experimentais. Foi utilizado um delineamento inteiramente casualizado com seis tratamentos e sete repetições, em quatro ciclos de produção de 28 dias/cada. Os tratamentos foram: Controle - 16,92% PB; 0,750% lisina digestível. Tratamentos 1 ao 5, com níveis de PB de 14% e lisina digestível de 0,600; 0,675; 0,750; 0,825 e 0,900%, respectivamente. Os níveis referentes aos tratamentos 1 e 2 (0,546 e 0,640% Met + Cis digestível / 0,600 e 0,675% de lisina digestível) proporcionaram menor tamanho do ovo; em contrapartida os ovos obtiveram maior porcentagem de casca, quando comparados à dieta controle. A exigência de lisina digestível em relação aos demais aminoácidos digestíveis, pode ser estimada em 0,750% em dieta com 14% de PB, o que corresponde ao consumo médio diário de 876 mg lisina dig. ave^-1 e 798 mg Met + Cis dig. ave^-1 dia^-1, sem comprometer o desempenho e qualidade interna e externa dos ovos.

Palavras-chave: proteína ideal, aminoácidos digestíveis, Isa Brown, exigência, dieta.

Introduction

Due to rise in production costs in animal nutrition caused by considerable increase in the prices of the main inputs, several studies have been undertaken on alternatives that might reduce crude protein levels for better economic results (KHAJALI et al., 2007) and lower environmental impact of the polluting excreta, mainly nitrogen (ROCHA et al., 2009) and ammonia emission rates (ROBERTS et al., 2007). Dudle-Cash (2012) inferred that, in normal conditions, diets for breeding broilers contained up to 40% excess levels of digestible lysine. The author also highlighted the importance of defining optimal levels of digestible amino acids and thus reducing the diets' protein levels.

According to Sá et al. (2007), estimates of amino acid requirements for laying hens are affected by several factors that may impact individually or together. Although primary utilized for egg mass, a lower percentage of daily necessities is used for maintenance. Since lysine plays an important metabolic function, the deficiency of this amino acid depresses growth and production, with consequent supplementation in diets for poultry. The above is due to the fact that cereals commonly used in feed composition contain low levels of amino acids (YAMANE et al., 2009).

Technological advances in large scale production of synthetic amino acids and accessible prices have facilitated their inclusion in the formulation of rations with lower crude protein rates (MOURA, 2004). According to Silva et al. (2000), the formulation of diets based on digestible amino acids is a new concept in nutrition in modern poultry production and actually represents a breakthrough. Jordão Filho et al. (2006b) report that increase in the performance of laying hens with supplementation of synthetic amino acids has been evaluated in many studies conducted in recent years and deserves attention with regard to the influence of amino acids on the internal quality of eggs in storage conditions. The internal and external quality of eggs has not received due attention in nutritional studies on laying hens when the effects of the specifications of amino acids in diets on the egg as human food is taken into account (JORDÃO FILHO et al., 2006b).

Genetic improvement has introduced new strains on the market and thus a considerable increase in productivity. In fact, Dudle-Cash, 2012, Figueiredo et al. (2012), Costa et al. (2008), and Jordão Filho et al. (2006a), point out that nutritional requirements should be evaluated and constantly renewed, together with the development of strains, since they are more efficient and productive. According to Jardim Filho et al. (2008), failure in nutrient supply results in poor quality eggs before impairment in the mobilization of nutrients for the maintenance of the reproductive system and the process of egg formation. This is particularly true when it comes to protein levels which determine production costs and depression of performance parameters and egg quality (ADEYEMO et al., 2012).

Current research evaluated the egg quality of semi-heavy laying hens fed on low protein diets (14.0% CP) and on different lysine levels, keeping the same digestible amino acids / digestible lysine ratio.

Material and methods

Current research was conducted at the Poultry Sector of the Department of Agricultural Sciences of Federal Institute of Minas Gerais, Bambuí Campus, Bambuí, Minas Gerais State, Brazil, during 16 experimental weeks, divided into four periods of 28 days each.

Four hundred and twenty commercial Isa Brown laying hens, initial age 28 weeks, were used, in a completely randomized design, divided into 6 treatments and seven replications. There were 42 experimental plots with 10 hens each, subdivided into 5 cages measuring 25 x 40 x 38 cm with 2 hens each. A selection of hens for egg production was conducted in the pre-trial period.

Treatments comprised Control, formulated according to nutritional requirements provided in the strain manual, with 16.92% crude protein (CP) and 0.750% digestible lysine. Treatment 1: 14.00% CP; 0.600% digestible lysine; Treatment 2: 14.00% CP; 0.675% digestible lysine; Treatment 3: 14.00% CP; 0.750% digestible lysine; Treatment 4: 14.00% CP; 0.825% digestible lysine; Treatment 5: 14.00% CP; 0.900% digestible lysine. Tables 1 and 2 show the nutritional composition and percentage of the experimental diets.

All diets of Treatments 1 through 5 were isonitrogenous (14% CP) with L-Alanine for nitrogen balance, isocaloric (2,800 kcal EM kg^-1), isocalcic (3.70%) and isophosphoric (0.35%) with different levels of lysine, keeping the same digestible amino acid / digestible lysine ratio (Table 3).

Hens were fed ad libitum within a light-dark program adopted at 16.5 hours of light / day provided by fluorescent light. Feeding, supplied in trough-type feeders, occurred twice a day and water was supplied from nipple-type drinkers.

Performance was evaluated for average feed intake (g hen^-1 day^-1). To calculate variables of internal and external quality of eggs, a representative sample of two whole eggs per experimental plot was collected, identified and weighed for subsequent analyses in the last two consecutive days of every 28-day period. Egg length and width (mm) were measured by a caliper (accuracy 0.02 mm) at their end and middle region. For specific gravity (g cm^-3), all whole eggs produced per plot were analyzed for their specific gravity by immersion into 10 buckets containing saline solution at a density between 1.066 and 1.102 g cm^-3, using an electronic oil densimeter for gauging.

Further, the sampled eggs were broken for further assessment. Haugh unit: with the above-mentioned calipers, the height of dense albumen was recorded in the midline of the egg white by the equation:

UH = 100 log. (H -G(30W^-37-100)/100+1.9)

where:

H = height of albumen (mm);

G = 32.2;

W = egg weight (g), according to Haugh (1937).

Percentage of yolk and albumen: The yolk was separated and weighed on a precision balance (0.01 g). Calculations were made on a percentage based on the weight of the intact egg. Eggshell percentage: after breaking, the shells were washed and dried in an oven for 48 hours for subsequent weighing. Shell thickness (mm): thickness was obtained at three points in the middle region of the shell, with the aid of an analog micrometer (0.01 mm accuracy).

Data were statistically analyzed with statistical program, analysis of variance system SISVAR (FERREIRA, 2000), with contrasts by Scheffé test between Control and other Treatments. For Treatments 1 to 5 and experimental periods, the regression analysis was used for the quantitative levels of lysine.

Results and discussion

There was no significant effect (p > 0.05) of contrasts of each proposed Treatment when compared with the average of the Control for the variables: Haugh unit, percentage of yolk and albumen (Table 4).

It may be observed that, even with reduced protein at different levels of lysine, it is not enough to change the internal components of the eggs. The results are similar to those by Khajali et al. (2007), or rather, the maintenance of the digestible amino acid / digestible lysine ratio allowed the reduction of protein levels of the diets of laying hens without impairing the levels of internal egg quality. In their studies on laying hens aged between 34 and 50 weeks, Sá et al. (2007) failed to report any effect of the variation in digestible lysine levels on the Haugh unit parameter.

The above was also reported by Figueiredo et al. (2012) and Jardim Filho et al. (2008, 2010) who registered no individual effects of amino acids in the proportions of egg components (albumen and yolk). They noted that, although lysine and threonine were important essential amino acids, the internal components of the egg were not easily affected since they were associated with physiologic measurements of the laying hens (FIGUEIREDO et al., 2012).

There was no effect of the lysine level on the diets (p > 0.05) by regression analysis of Treatments 1 to 5, on the variables Haugh unit, yolk and albumen percentage (Table 5).

Results are similar to those by Rocha et al. (2009) for lysine levels between 0.545 and 0.770% for laying hens aged between 24 and 40 weeks. Similarly, Matos et al. (2009) found no effect of digestible lysine levels on variables assessed by regression.

A significant effect (p < 0.05) was reported on external egg quality, except for specific gravity (Table 6).

Significant effect on feed intake (p < 0.05) occurred only in Treatment 5 (0.900% dig. Lys.), with a low consumption when compared to Control (0.750% dig. Lys.). The above result differs from that reported by Silva et al. (2006) and suggests that reduction in the level of dietary CP from 16.5 to 15.25 and 14.00%, without amino acid supplementation, did not affect feed intake and conversion per mass and per dozen eggs (p > 0.05). It further suggests the possibility of using diets with higher protein levels below the recommended rate.

There were significant effects (p < 0.01) of Treatments on the length and width of the eggs. Treatments 1 and 2 provided lower length and width when compared to Control . Result is underscored by shell percentage since the smallest egg size produced the greatest shell deposition. The above is based on the influence of daily intakes of Met + Cys on the size and weight of the egg (BERTECHINI, 2006). A lower feed intake was observed in Treatments 1 and 2, respectively with 620 and 690 mg Met + Cys hen^-1 day^-1, when compared to the consumption of 786 mg Met + Cys hen^-1 day^-1 of Control.

In their studies on the effects of lysine and threonine levels in laying hens in a 42 to 58-week period, Figueiredo et al. (2012) reported a significant interaction between the amino acids and suggested an association between amino acid imbalance and decreased feed intake. In fact, it may have negatively affected the intake of nutrients (calcium, phosphorus, vitamins, minerals and others) essential for the formation of the eggshell. No significant effect on internal and external quality of eggs was reported by Lima et al. (2012) in a study of protein reduction with enzyme supplementation. The availability of similar nutrients in all diets, albeit with reformulation and / or reduced protein, may explain the fact.

There was a significant difference (p < 0.05) in shell thickness in Treatments 2 and 4 when compared to Control, with better thickness in Treatments 2 and 4. These results differ from those by Jardim Filho et al. (2008) in their studies on different digestive lysine levels with no significant effect on this particular variable. There was no significant effect (p > 0.05) in specific gravity. Results were similar to those found by Jordão Filho et al. (2006a), Matos et al. (2009) and Figueiredo et al. (2012) who registered no effect of digestible lysine levels on this parameter.

When Treatments 1 to 5 were analyzed by regression, significant differences were observed (p < 0.01) for feed intake and egg width. However, the determination coefficient was low and the prediction equation could not be taken into consideration (Table 7).

Jardim Filho et al. (2010) registered a positive quadratic effect of supplemented digestible lysine for this parameter when studying 0.600, 0.700, 0.800 and 0.900% of digestible lysine for light laying hens, with lower feed intake at level 0.900%, respectively. Although there was a reduction of 2.92 percentage points of crude protein and digestible lysine levels ranging from 0.600 to 0.900%, it was not enough to affect its size and external component. Results agree with those by Jordão Filho et al. (2006a), who found no effects on eggshell quality eggs with lysine levels at peak production. This fact suggested that egg shell quality is not easily affected by dietary lysine supplementation.

Authors such as Jardim Filho et al. (2008, 2010) recommended a level of 600 mg kg^-1 of lysine for two strains of light laying hens and considered level of 15.8% crude protein for good quality eggs for the 24-48-week period. The digestible lysine requirement for light laying hens aged 24 to 40 weeks, cited by Rocha et al. (2009), is at least a daily average consumption of 759 mg digestible lysine / hen or 14 mg lysine / egg gram.

In the case of laying hens aged between 42 and 58 weeks, Figueiredo et al. (2012) concluded that, when aim was to maximize egg weight, egg mass and feed conversion, the dietary level recommended is 0.754, 0.772 and 0.804% digestible lysine, respectively. In the case of mass production and eggs of light laying hens, Matos et al. (2009) suggested levels 0.700 and 0.500% of digestible lysine and threonine, respectively, in 16% crude protein. For the level inferred in current research, or rather, 0.750% digestible lysine, threonine levels reached 0.760%, taking into account protein reduction from 16.92 to 14% crude protein.

In the case of semi-heavy laying hens, Sá et al. (2007) estimated requirements of digestible lysine, or rather, 0.732 and 0.715%, respectively, for 15% crude protein in light and semi-heavy laying hens, which corresponded to daily intakes of 893 and 804 mg of lysine for light and semi-heavy laying hens, respectively. At a higher level, Jordão Filho et al. (2006a) recommended 0.840% digestible lysine for laying hens aged between 30 and 46 weeks, and subjected to 17.1% crude protein.

Conclusion

The digestible lysine requirement is estimated at 0.750% on a diet with 14% CP, which corresponds to an average daily intake of 876 mg of excavation Lys hen^-1 day^-1, without affecting the internal and external quality eggs.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ajinomoto^® do Brasil/Ajinomoto Animal Nutrition for supporting the research and providing the amino acids.

Received on September 5, 2013.

Accepted on October 29, 2013.

• ADEYEMO, G. O.; ABIOYE, S. A.; ADEREMI, F. A. The effect of varied dietary crude protein levels with balanced amino acids on performance and egg quality characteristics of layer at first laying phase. Food and Nutrition Sciences, v. 3, n. 4, p. 526-529, 2012.
• BERTECHINI, A. G. Nutrição de monogástricos, 1. ed. Lavras: UFLA, 2006.
• COSTA, F. G. P.; OLIVEIRA, C. F. S.; DOURADO, L. R. B.; NETO, R. C. L.; CAMPOS, M. A. S. F.; LIMA, A. G. V. O. Níveis de cálcio em dietas para poedeiras semipesadas após o pico de postura. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 37, n. 4, p. 624-628, 2008.
• DUDLE-CASH, B. Breeder hen lysine levels in surplus. Feedstuffs, v. 84, n. 19, p. 12, 2012.
• FERREIRA, D. F. SISVAR: sistema para análise de variância para dados balanceados: programa de análises estatísticas e planejamento de experimentos: versão 4.3. Lavras: UFLA, 2000.
• FIGUEIREDO, G. O.; BERTECHINI, A. G.; FASSANI, E. J.; RODRIGUES, P. B.; BRITO, J. Á. G.; CASTRO, S. F. Performance and egg quality of laying hens fed with dietary levels of digestible lysine and threonine. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, v. 64, n. 3, p. 743-750, 2012.
• HAUGH, R. R. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. U. S. Egg and Poultry Magazine, v. 43, n.2, p. 552-555, 1937.
• JARDIM FILHO, R. M.; STRINGHNI, J. H.; ANDRADE, M. A.; CAFÉ, M. B.; LEANDRO, N. S. M.; CARVALHO, F. B. Níveis de lisina digestível para poedeiras Hy-Line W-36 em produção. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 39, n. 4, p. 787-795, 2010.
• JARDIM FILHO, R. M.; STRINGHNI, J. H.; ANDRADE, M. A.; NUNES, A. B.; LEANDRO, N. S. M.; CAFÉ, M. B.; LEANDRO, N. S. M. Qualidade dos ovos, parâmetros bioquímicos sanguíneos e desenvolvimento do aparelho reprodutor de poedeiras comerciais Lohmann LSL alimentadas com níveis crescentes de lisina digestível. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 30, n. 1, p. 25-31, 2008.
• JORDÃO FILHO, J.; VILAR DA SILVA, J. H.; LINDOLFO DA SILVA, E.; RIBEIRO, M. L. G.; COSTA, F. G. P.; RODRIGUES, P. B. Exigência de lisina para poedeiras semipesadas durante o pico de postura. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1728-1734, 2006a.
• JORDÃO FILHO, J.; SILVA, J. H. V.; SILVA, E. L.; ARAÚJO, D. M.; RIBEIRO, M. L. G.; LIMA, M. R. Efeitos da relação metionina + cistina:lisina sobre os desempenhos produtivo e econômico e a qualidade interna e externa dos ovos antes e após 28 dias de armazenamento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 35, n. 4, p. 1735-1743, 2006b.
• KHAJALI, F.; FARAJI, M.; DEHKORDI, S. K. Effects of reduced-protein diets at constant total sulfur amino acids: lysine ratio on pullet development and subsequent laying hen performance. American Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, v. 2, n. 4, p. 89-92, 2007.
• LIMA, M. R. L.; COSTA, F. G. P.; GOULART, C. C.; PINHEIRO, S. G.; SOUZA, R. B.; MORAIS, S. A. N.; LIMA, R. C. Nutritional reduction of protein and usage of enzyme in the diet of light Layers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 41, n. 9, p. 2055-2063, 2012.
• MATOS, M. S.; LEANDRO, N. S. M.; STRINGHINI, J. H.; CAFÉ, M. B.; CARVALHO, F. B.; GOMES, N. A. Níveis de lisina e treonina digestíveis para poedeiras comerciais Lohmann LSL de 24 a 44 semanas de idade. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, v. 31, n. 1, p. 19-24, 2009.
• MOURA, A. M. A. Conceito da proteína ideal aplicada na nutrição de aves e suínos. Revista Eletrônica Nutritime, v. 1, n. 1, p. 31-34, 2004.
• ROBERTS, A.; XIN, H.; KERR, B. J.; RUSSELL, J. R.; BREGENDAHL, K. Effects of dietary fiber and reduced crude protein on nitrogen balance and egg production in laying hens. Poultry Science, v. 86, n. 1, p. 1716-1725, 2007.
• ROCHA, T. C.; GOMES, P. C.; DONZELE, J. L.; BARRETO, S. L. T.; MELLO, H. H. C.; BRUMANO, G. Níveis de lisina digestível em rações para poedeiras no período de 24 a 40 semanas de idade. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 38, n. 9, p. 1726-1731, 2009.
• ROSTAGNO, H. S. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 3. ed. Viçosa: Editora UFV, 2011.
• SÁ, L. M.; GOMES, P. C. G.; ROSTAGNO, H. S.; ALBINO, L. F. T.; D'AGOSTINI, P. Exigência nutricional de lisina digestível para galinhas poedeiras no período de 34 a 50 semanas de idade. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 36, n. 6, p. 1829-1836, 2007.
• SILVA, E. L.; SILVA, J. H. V.; JORDÃO FILHO, J.; RIBEIRO, M. L.; MARTINS, T. D. D.; COSTA, F. G. P. Redução dos níveis protéicos e suplementação com metionina e lisina em rações para poedeiras leves. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 35, n. 2, p. 491-496, 2006.
• SILVA, J. H. V.; MUKAMI, F.; ALBINO, L. F. T. Uso de rações à base de aminoácidos digestíveis para poedeiras. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, v. 29, n. 5, p. 1446-1451, 2000.
• YAMANE, H.; KURAUCHI, I.; DENBOW, D. M.; FURUSE, M. Central functions of amino acids for the stress response in chicks. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, v. 22, n. 2, p. 296-304, 2009.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  15 Apr 2014
• Date of issue
  Mar 2014

History

• Accepted
  29 Oct 2013
• Received
  05 Sept 2013