SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.76 número3Condutas pós-manobra de Epley em idosos com VPPB de canal posteriorDetecção de Epstein-Barr vírus no carcinoma da nasofaringe: implicações numa área de baixo risco índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

versão impressa ISSN 1808-8694

Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. (Impr.) vol.76 no.3 São Paulo maio/jun. 2010

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000300006 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Influence of glutathione s-transferase on the ototoxicity caused by aminoglycosides

 

 

Bruna PalodettoI; Mariana PostalI; Carlos Roberto Escrivão GrignoliII; Edi Lúcia SartoratoIII; Camila Andréa de OliveiraIV

IUndergraduate student - Biomedics
IIMSc. Adjunct Professor - Hermínio Ometto University - UNIARARAS
IIIAssociate Professor; Researcher - Molecular Biology and Genetic Engineering Center - CBMEG - UNICAMP
IVPhD; Assistant Professor - Health Sciences Center - NUCISA - Hermínio Ometto University - UNIARARAS

 

 


ABSTRACT

The process of hair cell damage and death as a result of exposure to noise and ototoxins seems to be mediated by reactive oxygen species.
AIM: To investigate the relationship between genetic polymorphisms in the Glutathione S-transferase and the susceptibility to hearing loss induced by aminoglycosides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Null genotypes were analyzed by multiplex-PCR in the DNA samples from 50 patients and 72 controls. The patients were divided into 3 groups, 10 with hearing loss using aminoglycosides (group A), 20 with hearing loss without exposure to the drug (group B) and 20 hearing individuals who used the antibiotic (group C).
STUDY DESIGN: Experimental.
RESULTS: Polymorphisms in the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes were found in 16% and 42% of patients and in 18% and 53% of the control group, respectively. After statistical analysis no significant difference was observed between the control groups and A (p=0.86) and (p=0.41), controls and B (p=0.27) and (p=0.24), controls and C (p=0.07) and (p=0.47), controls and A + C (p=0.09) and (p=0.47), C and A (p=0.32) and (p=0.75), GSTT1 and GSTM1, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our data show that polymorphisms in GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes have no influence on the ototoxicity of aminoglycosides.

Keywords: aminoglycosides, molecular biology, oxidative stress, hearing loss, genetic polymorphism.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Many are the factors responsible for hearing impairment (HI), and they include the environment, infections, noise and ototoxic agents - which damage the auditory nerve; or genetics1. Among the genetic cases, it is believed that there are more than 100 genes involved in the etiology of non-syndromic sensorineural hearing loss2.

Oxygen reactive species (ORS) are involved in a growing number of diseases, including hearing loss - in a lesser frequency. Nonetheless, oxidative stress is strongly related to ototoxic-induced hearing deficiency caused by aminoglycosides or the noise-induced hearing loss type. In these cases, the toxic components are converted into hydroxyl radicals, causing the death of cochlear hair cells3. Nonetheless, in normal metabolic processes, important ORS (superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and hydroxyl radicals) are also generated during O2 and H2O reduction. Thus, enzymes belonging to the antioxidant system, which act on the metabolism of glutathione and on the decomposition of superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide, are activated on an attempt to neutralize these molecules which potentially damage the cochlear tissue4.

Glutathione (GSH) detoxifies a number of exogenous and endogenous substances, by a non-enzymatic pathway and by enzymatic conjugation of the metabolites catalyzed by S-Transferase Glutathione (GST)5. GSTs are broken down into eight gene classes which codify cytosolic enzymes and microsomal genes: α (GSTA), µ (GSTM), π (GSTP), θ (GSTT), z (GSTZ), σ (GSTS), w (GSTO) and k (GSTK)6. The GST enzymes have different affinities to numerous substrates and are found in many tissues at different concentrations7.

In humans, two of these subclasses GSTM1 and GSTT1, have genetic variability. About 30-50% of the individuals had a null genotype for gene GSTM1, depending on the race8 and 25-40% carried the null genotype of gene GSTT19. Individuals with the null genotype do not conjugate metabolites or specific toxins for these enzymes, thus increasing susceptibility to damage caused by oxidative stress and, possibly, the noise-induced hearing deficit10.

Changes to the antioxidant system and an increase in the oxidative stress can potentialize the toxicological responses associated with glutathione reduction. This indicates that the radicals generated modulate the activity and the expression of the antioxidant enzymes11. In the cochlea, the antioxidant activities play a crucial role on the reduction of damage caused by ototoxic agents, noise and aging. In vitro, gentamicin forms a complex with iron, producing free radicals12. Similarly, in vivo, it increases the levels of peroxide in the lipids13. In an external hair cell culture, glutathione prevents gentamicin-induced cytotoxicity and dampens the antibiotic-induced hearing loss in malnourished animals14. Thus, this study aimed at assessing the genetic variability of genes GSTM1 and GSTT1 and the ototoxic susceptibility of the aminoglycoside antibiotics in normal-hearing individuals and those with hearing impairment.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Group selection

The study was carried out in individuals with hearing impairment (HI) who used or did not use aminoglycoside ototoxic antibiotics, and in hearing newborns, premature and high-risk babies who remained at least 48 hours in the neonatal ICU and were exposed to the antibiotic. The patients were broken down into three groups: group A, individuals with hearing impairment and who used aminoglycosides (n=10); group B, with hearing impairment and who did not use aminoglycosides (n=20); and group C, hearing individuals who used aminoglycosides (n=20). The control group was made up of 72 individuals, randomly selected from the general population.

Molecular analysis of genes GSTM1 and GSTT1

Samples of genomic DNA were extracted from the peripheral blood after obtaining the signed consent form approved by the Ethics Committee (Approval # 484/2006). In order to extract the DNA from individuals from the general population we used the DNAzol reagent, according to instructions from the manufacturer (Invitrogen®). In the samples from the other groups we used the phenol-chloroform standard.

The polymorphic sequences of genes GSTM1 and GSTT1 were established by a multiplex PCR, including the b-globin gene as internal control of the 630pb15 amplification. The reaction was carried out using 200 to 500ng of the genomic DNA, 10mM of solution with deoxynucleotides (dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP), 20pmol/ml of the b-globin gene primers, 10pmol/ml of each primer from genes GST; 2.5U of Taq DNA polymerase; 10X PCR buffer (Tris-HCl 10mM pH 8.8) and 3mM of MgCl2, in a final volume of 50ml. PCR-multiplex conditions happened by an initial denaturation at 95ºC for 3min followed by 35 cycles (95ºC for 1min; 60ºC per 1min; 72ºC per 1min) and a final extension at 72ºC for 10min. The PCR products were analyzed in 1.5% agarose gel dyed in ethide bromide, and the null genotype (both alleles deleted) for genes GSTT1 and GSTM1 was identified by the absence of amplification fragments of 480pb and 273pb, respectively (Fig.1).

 

 

Statistical Analysis

The statistical significance differences between the groups were calculated by c2 followed by the Yates correction with a 5% significance level (p £ 0.05 values are considered significant).

 

RESULTS

The genotypes were grouped by hearing normality, presence of hearing impairment and exposure to aminoglycoside antibiotics. The null GSTT1 was found in 16% (08 of 50) of the patients and in 18% (13 of 72) of the control individuals (p= 0.009). Null GSTM1 alleles were found in 21 (42%) of the 50 patients studied and in 38 (53%) individuals from the general population (p= 0.049). The frequency of homozygote GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes was significantly lower in patients assessed when compared to control individuals.

The frequency of null GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes and the comparison of the results among the groups are shown on Table 1. Nonetheless, no significant statistical difference was seen in groups control and A (p= 0.86) and (p= 0.41), control and B (p= 0.27) and (p= 0.24), control and C (p= 0.07) and (p= 0.47), control and A+C (p= 0.09) and (p= 0.47), C and A (p= 0.32) and (p= 0.75), GSTT1 and GSTM1, respectively.

 

DISCUSSION

Antioxidant and detoxifying reactions related to glutathione are essential for intracellular protection. Nonetheless, it is known that the treatment with some drugs and time affect the inner ear defense system of mammals. Noise exposure and treatment with gentamicin do not affect tissue glutathione levels. Nonetheless, the antioxidant system is being influenced by aging and by the use of cisplatin16.

Many studies suggest that the antioxidant activity can impact the hearing loss susceptibility. There are reports of genetic polymorphism on GSTM1 which act against the ototoxicity of cisplatin17, besides showing an apparent protective effect on the external hair cells in noise-exposed individuals10. In such a case, individuals with null genotype for the GSTM1 gene, on the otoacoustic emission, have lower amplitude for higher frequencies when compared to individuals without polymorphism in this gene. On the other hand, in another study, we did not show any evidence that the genetic variability of the antioxidant system prevails over other potential factors on the susceptibility regarding noise-induced hearing loss18.

The availability of information on GSTT1 and GSTM1 polymorphisms in the Brazilian population is still scarce19. A study carried out in the Brazilian population from the states of Pará and São Paulo showed frequencies of 18% and 47.3% for the null genotypes for genes GSTT1 and GSTM1, respectively20. In this paper, the frequencies found were very similar, null genotype for GSTT1 was of 16% and for GSTM1 it was 42%. Notwithstanding, there is no data in the literature for glutathione S-transferase (GSTT1 and GSTM1) polymorphism be associated to the susceptibility of aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss.

Nonetheless, we know that there are numerous environmental factors which can cause hearing loss, such as glutathione S-transferase that have an important role to play on the defense against oxidative stress caused by these factors.

 

CONCLUSION

Our data strongly suggests that the null GSTT1 and GSTM1 genotypes are not associated to aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss.

 

REFERENCES

1. Kalatzis V, Petit C. The fundamental and medical impacts of recent progress in research on hereditary hearing loss. Hum Mol Genet. 1998;7(10):1589-97.         [ Links ]

2. Sobe T, Vreugde S, Shahin H, Berlin M, Davis N, Kanaan M, et al. The prevalence and expression of inherited connexin 26 mutations associated with nonsyndromic hearing loss in the Israeli population. Hum Genet. 2000;6:50-1.         [ Links ]

3. Jacono AA, Hu B, Kopke RD, Henderson D, Van De Water TR, Steinman HM. Changes in cochlear antioxidant enzyme activity after sound conditioning and noise exposure in the chinchilla. Hear Res. 1998;117:31-8.         [ Links ]

4. Clerici WJ, Yang L. Direct effects of intraperilymphatic reactive oxygen species generation on cochlear function. Hear Res. 1996;101:14-22.         [ Links ]

5. Meister A, Anderson ME. Transport and direct utilization of gama-glutamylcyst(e)ine for glutathione synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1983;80:707-11.         [ Links ]

6. Strange RC, Spiteri MA, Ramachandran S, Fryer AA. Glutathione-S-transferase family of enzymes. Mutat Res. 2001;482:21-6.         [ Links ]

7. Wang L, Groves MJ, Hepburn MD, Bowen DT. Glutathione S-transferase enzyme expression in hematopoietic cell lines implies a differential protective role for T1 and A1 isoenzymes in erythroid and for M1 in lymphoid lineages. Haematologica. 2000;85:573-9.         [ Links ]

8. Losi-Guembarovski R, Colus IMS. Glutationa S-transferase M1 (GSTM-1): Distribuição étnica e relação com câncer. Ci Biol Saúde. 2001;22:3-9.         [ Links ]

9. Pemble S, Schroeder K, Spencer S, Meyer DJ, Hallier E, Bolt HM, et al. Human glutathione S-transferase theta (GSTT1): DNA cloning and the characterization of a genetic polymorphism. Biochem J. 1994;300:271-6.         [ Links ]

10. Rabinowitz PM, Pierce Wise J Sr, Hur Mobo B, Antonucci PG, Powell C, Slade M. Antioxidant status and hearing function in noise-exposed workers. Hear Res. 2002;173:164-71.         [ Links ]

11. Meister A. Glutathione deficiency produced by inhibition of its synthesis, and its reversal; applications in research and therapy. Pharmacol Ther. 1991;51(2):155-94.         [ Links ]

12. Priuska EM, Schacht J. Formation of free radicals by gentamicin and iron and evidence for an iron/gentamicin complex. Biochem Pharmacol. 1995;50(11):1749-52.         [ Links ]

13. Sadzuka Y, Shoji T, Takino Y. Effect of cisplatin on the activities of enzymes which protect against lipid peroxidation. Biochem Pharmacol. 1992;43(8):1872-5.         [ Links ]

14. Lautermann J, McLaren J, Schacht J. Glutathione protection against gentamicin ototoxicity depends on nutritional status. Hear Res. 1995;86:15-24.         [ Links ]

15. Arruda VR, Lima CS, Grignoli CR, de Melo MB, Lorand-Metze I, Alberto FL, et al. Increased risk for acute myeloid leukaemia in individuals with glutathione S-transferase mu1 (GSTM1) and theta1 (GSTT1) gene defects. Eur J Haematol. 2001;66(6):383-8.         [ Links ]

16. Lautermann J, Crann SA, McLaren J, Schacht J. Gluthatione-dependent antioxidant systems in the mammalian inner ear: effects of aging, ototoxic drugs and noise. Hear Res. 1997;114:75-82.         [ Links ]

17. Peters U, Preisler-Adams S, Hebeisen A, Hahn M, Seifert E, Lanvers C, et al. Glutathione S-transferase genetic polymorphisms and individual sensitivity to the ototoxic effect of cisplatin. Anticancer Drugs. 2000;11(8):639-43.         [ Links ]

18. Carlsson P, Laer LV, Borg E, Bondeson ML, Thys M, Fransen E, et al. Influence of genetic variation in oxidative stress genes on human noise susceptibility. Hear Res. 2005;202:87-96.         [ Links ]

19. Rossit ARB, Cabral IR, Conforti-Froes NDT. Avaliação das frequências alélicas de genes do biometabolismo em uma população brasileira. Genet Mol Biol. 1999;22:23.         [ Links ]

20. Rebbeck T. Molecular epidemiology of the human glutathione S-transferase genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997;6:733-43.         [ Links ]

 

 

Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System - Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on March 3, 2009; and accepted on April 2, 2009. cod. 6298