Ricinus communis membrane for orbital reconstruction

CASE REPORT

Ricinus communis membrane for orbital reconstruction

João Daniel Caliman e Gurgel^I; Lydio Alves Filho^II; Vespasiano Lopes de Farias^III; André Moyses Portugal^IV; Krishnamurti Matos de Araújo Sarmento Júnior^V

^IMaster's degree and doctoral student in medicine (otorhinolaryngology), Medical College of the São Paulo Holy House (Santa Casa de São Paulo). Otorhinolaryngologist and craniomaxillofacial surgeon

^IIFull member of the Brazilian Plastic Surgery Society, plastic surgery

^IIIFull member of the Brazilian Plastic Surgery Society. Head of the Craniomaxillofacial Surgery Unit, Dr. Dório Silva Hospital

^IVMember of the Brazilian Otorhinolaryngology and Cervicofacial Surgery Association. Otorhinolaryngologist

^VMaster's degree in surgery, Rio de Janeiro Federal University. Otorhinolaryngologist

^{Send correspondence to}

Keywords: bioprosthesis, orbital fractures, traumatology.

INTRODUCTION

Blunt trauma of the periorbital area or fractures of the zygomatico maxillary complex are common in facial trauma; these injuries often extend to the floor of the orbit.¹ These traumas may result in major deformities, which may include injury of the ocular globe and loss of vision.² Blow-out fractures of the floor of the orbit, even plain fractures, may cause functional and cosmetic disorders such as residual dystopia, limited ocular globe movement, diplopia, and enophthalmus due to herniated periorbital fat into the maxillary sinus that is often accompanied by entrapment of the extra-ocular muscle between bone fragments. Surgery for the treatment of orbital fractures, when indicated, involves reconstructing the walls of the orbit to provide support for its content during the initial healing phase; the aim is to achieve good esthetic and functional results. Several materials have been used for reconstructing the walls of the orbit, such as: titanium mesh, medpore, autogenous bone, and alloplastic bioresorbable materials.¹

The purpose of this study was to report two cases of orbit reconstruction with a castor seed polymer membrane.

CASE REPORTS

Patient one: a history of a fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex by mugging during robbery. The patient presented a right bipalpebral hematoma and edema, diplopia, malar flattening and fractures of the zygomaticomaxillary crest, the zygomaticofrontal suture, and the lower orbital margin; there was also epistaxis and a nose fracture.

Patient two: a history of a vehicle accident resulting in cranial-encephalic trauma, a subdural hematoma, a sagittal fracture of the palate, a fracture of the zygomaticomaxillary complex (zygomaticomaxillary crest, frontal ramus of the zygomatic bone, lower orbital margin, the floor and the medial wall of the orbit, ocular dystopia, avulsion of the tooth 11, and fracture of teeth 31 and 41.

Both patients underwent surgery involving reduction of the fractures, rigid internal fixation with titanium miniplates and specific 1.3 and 1.5 mm screws, and reconstruction of the floor of the orbit (and medial wall in patient two) using a 0.5 mm thickness castor seed polymer membrane (Fig. 1). The membrane was immersed in warm saline solution and molded to the contours of the orbital walls. Patients were asymptomatic 24 months later. Diplopia and ocular dystopia resolved completely. There was no inflammation on the graft sites using the castor oil seed polymer during the follow-up period.

DISCUSSION

There are several materials available for restoring the orbit walls; there is no consensus on which is the best. The ideal material for rebuilding the orbit - particularly the floor - should be sufficiently strong to support the content of the orbit, affordable, biocompatible, and preferably bioresorbable. The growing demand for different reconstruction materials to treat orbital fractures - restoring the margins and its volume - has had a direct impact on surgery.²

Studies have shown that polyurethane polymers derived from castor oil are biocompatible, non-toxic, poorly hydrophilic, and that foster regeneration and incorporation of organic tissues.³ Several authors have demonstrated experimentally that castor seed membranes are biocompatible and induce minor or no foreign body reaction. These researcher have also found that bone renegeration/neoformation replaces the implant, which is gradually absorbed.^4-6

Large case series studying the castor seed polymer membrane for orbit reconstruction in human beings have not been published.

FINAL COMMENTS

The castor seed polymer membrane is an affordable, non-toxic, well-tolerated material that is a good choice for the treatment of orbit wall fractures.

REFERENCES

1. Tuncer, S, Yavuzer, R, Kandal, S, Demir, YH, Ozmen, S, Latifoglu, O, Atabay, L. Reconstruction of traumatic orbital floor fractures with resorbable mesh plate. J Craniofac Surg.2007;18(3):598-605

2. Kontio, R, Lindqvist, C. Management of orbital fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am.2009;21:209-20

3. Ignácio, H. Utilização do cimento derivado do polímero da mamona no preenchimento de falha óssea. Estudo experimental em coelhos. Dissertação (Mestrado). Ribeirão Preto: Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da USP, 1995.

4. Garcia Junior IR. Utilização dos implantes de Polietileno Medpor, Poliuretana de Mamona e Matriz Óssea bovina em defeitos ósseos maxilares. Análise histológica e histométrica em macacos. Tese (Doutorado). Araçatuba: Universidade Federal Paulista, 2000.

5. Dias, PCJ, Granato, L, Ramalho, LTO, Oliveira, JÁ, Pretel, J. Avaliação histológica da biocompatibilidade do polímero da mamona no dorso nasal de macacos-pregos (Cebus apella). Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(3):350-5.

6. Leonel, ECF, Mangilli, PD, Ramalho, LTO, Andrade Sobrinho, J. A importância da porosidade interna do polímero de mamona durante a neoformação óssea - estudo em ratos. Cienc Odontol Bras.2003.6(3):19-25

Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System - Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on December 31, 2009; and accepted on January 14, 2010. cod. 6862

Rio Doce Hospital.

Send correspondence to:

João Daniel Caliman e Gurgel

Av. Nicola Biancardi 1181/104 Centro

Linhares ES 29900-209.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  25 Apr 2011
• Date of issue
  Apr 2011