SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.78 issue3Hearing loss prevalence in patients with diabetes mellitus type 1Otoprotection in guinea pigs exposed to pesticides and ginkgo biloba author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Print version ISSN 1808-8694

Braz. j. otorhinolaryngol. vol.78 no.3 São Paulo May/June 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000300019 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Cholesteatoma gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors by RT-PCR

 

 

Carlos Eduardo Borges RezendeI; Ricardo Peres do SoutoII; Priscila Bogar RapoportIII; Laís de CamposIV; Marcela Bovo GeneratoV

IMSc student in the Health Sciences Program at FMABC (Professor of otorhinolaryngology at FMABC)
IIPhD in Biochemistry at USP (Associate Professor of Biochemistry at FMABC)
IIIPhD in Medicine at the University of São Paulo (Professor of Otorhinolaryngology at FMABC)
IVStudent of Pharmaceutic Sciences at FMABC (Student of Pharmaceutic Sciences at FMABC)
VStudent of Pharmaceutic Sciences at FMABC (Student of Pharmaceutic Sciences at FMABC)

Send correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

Acquired middle ear cholesteatoma is a benign keratinizing hyperproliferative squamous epithelial lesion that may result in the destruction of the bone structures surrounding the temporal bone. Recent studies show that variations in cellular production of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and their specific inhibitors (TIMPs) contribute to the pathophysiology of cholesteatoma.
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the use of RNA amplification tests to evaluate the expression of MMP and TIMP isoforms in cholesteatomas and their correlation with disease severity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective study. Nineteen cholesteatoma cases at different stages were selected. RNA collected from biopsy specimens was submitted to reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for semiquantitative amplification of MMP2, MMP3, MMP9, MMP13 and TIMP1.
RESULTS: Six cholesteatomas were positive for at least one of the studied genes. Four samples amplified a single gene (MMP2 or MMP13) and two samples amplified three genes (MMP2, TIMP1 and MMP3 or MMP13). No sample amplified MMP9.
CONCLUSION: RT-PCR can be used to assess MMP and TIMP gene expression in cholesteatomas despite technical difficulties. Gene expression profiles could not be related to disease severity.

Keywords: cholesteatoma, gene expression, matrix metalloproteinases, middle ear, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Middle-ear acquired cholesteatoma is a benign squamous epithelial keratinizing hyperproliferative lesion resembling the epidermis1 that develops inside the tympanic cavity2-4. It manifests as a type of epidermoid cyst with an extracellular matrix made up of squamous stratified keratinized epithelium over a secondary perimatrix containing collagen and elastic fibers, fibroblasts, and inflammatory cells5,6. Middle-ear cholesteatomas are characterized by intense cell proliferation - accompanied by the consequent accumulation of keratin debris - and destruction of bone structures surrounding the temporal bone. They may involve the ossicles, blood vessels, the facial nerve, and even invade the inner ear and intracranial space7-9. Cholesteatomas may lead to the onset of hearing loss, tinnitus, vertigo, loss of balance, and other severe complications such as meningitis, sigmoid sinus thrombosis, facial paralysis, and brain abscess2.

It has recently become evident that the proteolytic activity triggered by cholesteatomas plays a key role in the bone remodeling of the middle ear and the temporal bone10. Bone lysis and recurrence are relevant features in the pathophysiology of cholesteatoma, giving it the status of a dangerous, difficult-to-treat condition11. Alterations in keratinocyte proliferation, differentiation, and migration are impacted by fibroblast activation in the perimatrix and by the release of cytokines and growth factors by inflammatory infiltrate cells4,12.

Injury to tissues adjacent to cholesteatomas also occurs due to the action of various proteolytic enzymes such as plasminogen activators and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs)3,7. MMPs are zinc and calcium-dependent endopeptidases synthesized by different types of cells such as fibroblasts, keratinocytes, macrophages, and endothelial cells activated by proteolytic cleavage8,10,13-16. MMP proteolytic activity is precisely controlled by their precursors during activation and inhibited by endogenous inhibitors, alpha macroglobulins, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs)8,17. The balance between MMPs and TIMPs is critical in determining the integrity of the extracellular matrix (ECM); thus, the variations in presence and activity level of these proteins may contribute in a number of tissue events observed in cholesteatoma patients3,8,17.

Specific cholesteatoma MMP isoenzymes (MMP2, MMP3, and MMP9) were first identified in 199617 with the use of immunohistochemistry tests. Since then, immunohistochemistry has been extensively used to analyze and compare changes in enzyme levels in cholesteatomas and healthy tissues. Increased levels of MMP97,10,11,14, MMP25, MMP118, MMP8 and MMP1319 have been reported. Immune labeling of MMP2, 3 and 9 was observed mainly in the basal and suprabasal layers of the cholesteatoma epithelium10,14,17; MMP9 was specifically seen in areas with inflammatory cell infiltration8.

This study aims to analyze the applicability of reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) to semiquantitatively assess gene expression in matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors. If RT-PCR is proven adequate, we will attempt to correlate gene expression to disease severity based on the patients' clinical history, audiometric assessment, and imaging findings.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a prospective study designed to offer the basis required to reach the proposed goals and additional information on the topic, aside from aiding in the identification of the determining factors connected to the phenomena and events described herein20. Nineteen patients aged between 5 and 70 years diagnosed with various stages of chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media were enrolled in this study. They were seen and operated at the institution's ENT ward from 2007 to 2009. Patients previously submitted to mastoidectomy and with unconfirmed diagnosis of cholesteatoma by pathology tests were excluded. This research project was approved by the Institution's Ethics Committee and granted permit nº. 356/2007.

Auditory involvement was assessed through pure-tone and speech audiometry and ranged from mild conductive dysacusis to profound sensorineural dysacusis. The extension of the involvement by cholesteatoma was analyzed in CT scans and graded based on findings such as scutum erosion, erosion of the ossicular chain, fistula in the lateral semicircular canal, erosion of the tegmen tympani, and Fallopian canal dehiscence. The extent of erosion was assessed by the number of involved structures. Presence of erosion on one structure was categorized as +; erosion on two structures was graded ++; and erosion on three or more structures was rated as +++. None of the patients had advanced stage complications such as facial paralysis, meningitis, encephalitis, or brain abscess.

Open mastoidectomy was the approach used to remove the cholesteatomas in our group of patients. Surgery findings on the extent of involvement and erosion supported the imaging findings on the integrity of the middle ear ceiling (tegmen tympani), the wall of the lateral semicircular canal, the scutum, and the facial canal (Fallopian canal).

Nineteen suspicious specimens were collected and all were confirmed as cholesteatoma by the pathologist. The specimens were promptly frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept in a freezer at -70ºC to maintain messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) integrity. RNA was isolated using Trizol® (Invitrogen) or the Illustra RNAspin® (GE Helthcare) kit. RNA quantification was done through UV spectrophotometry at 260 nm using device GeneQuant® (Amersham-Pharmacia) or by fluorometry in a Qubit® device (Invitrogen). Total RNA was transformed into complementary DNA (cDNA) by reverse transcription using oligonucleotide dT as a primer and enzyme Superscript RT III® (Invitrogen). The specific cDNA of each MMP or TIMP isoform was amplified by PCR, using reagent mix Master Mix (Promega®) and the primers described in the literature (glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase - GAPDH21 and MMP2, 3, 9 e 1322) or others picked based on their respective mRNA sequences found on GenBank (TIMP-1). For more data on primers, please refer to Chart 1. The amplification protocol is initialized with sample incubation at 94ºC for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles at three temperatures: 94ºC for 1 minute (denaturation), 58ºC for 1 minute (annealing), 72ºC for 1 minute (extension); the last step is incubation at 72ºC for 10 minutes. PCR products were then separated by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis (buffer TAE, 100 V) with ethidium bromide added as a fluorescent tag. The gel images were captured using a digital camera.

 

 

RESULTS

The clinical characterization of the cholesteatomas of the 19 patients enrolled in the study can be seen in Table 1. Patient mean age was 38.7 years (7-67). Most of them had right ear cholesteatomas (14/19; 73.7%). CT images indicated a wide array of injuries; one patient had no erosion, while five had erosion in only one ear structure; eight had two compromised structures and five had three structures affected by erosion. As for dysacusis, most patients had mixed hearing loss.

The first procedure carried out to analyze gene expression was the amplification of the mRNA from gene GAPDH, assuming that there would be identical expression of this enzyme in the glycolytic pathway of all analyzed tissue samples. Despite the differences in RNA concentration in the samples, higher levels of homogeneity in GAPDH amplification yield were attained when sample equivalent volume were analyzed (Figure 1). GAPDH amplification from the sample collected from patient 9 was processed in 30, 35, and 40 PCR cycles. At 35 cycles, the set condition for amplification used in the study, the reaction had not reached saturation.

 

 

RT-PCR was applied to all samples for metalloproteinases 2 and 9; only samples 2, 3, and 10 had amplification for MMP2, and none had amplification for MMP9 (see results on Figure 2A). Samples 2,3,4,10,11,12,13,14,15, and 16 were amplified for MMP3, MMP13 and TIMP1; clear amplification for TIMP1 and MMP13 was seen in samples 2, 15, 17, and 19, and for MMP3 and TIMP1 in sample 3 (see Figure 2B). Some reactions were not successful due to limited availability of RNA and technical difficulties in processing small highly keratinized samples. The results for MMP and TIMP amplification can be seen on Table 1.

 

 

DISCUSSION

Chronic cholesteatomatous otitis media is still a relevant public health concern in developing countries. It is an aggressive benign inflammatory disease that may evolve to hearing impairment as it compromises soft tissue, bone liners, ossicles and invades adjacent structures such as nerves, blood vessels, the cochlea, the labyrinth, and the brain.

The presence of MMPs and their inhibitors may be associated with higher levels of cholesteatoma-related lysis. RT-PCR may aid in the analysis of the expression of MMPs and their inhibitors and in the establishment of correlation between molecular activity and disease aggressiveness. Once such correlation is confirmed, it will be possible to propose strategies to control the disease's biochemical development. Some studies have found positive correlations between cholesteatoma aggressiveness and increased levels of MMP25 and MMP910,23, given the way these enzymes operate biologically. MMP inhibition is being tested as a therapy for various ENT disorders24; however, in a pioneering study that looked into treating cholesteatomas in animal models with MMP-inhibitor ilomastat, disease progression remained unaffected25.

Our study found high levels of MMP2 expression in samples 2 and 3, and lower intensity expression in sample 10. Contrary to what various other authors have found7,10,13,23, enzyme MMP9 was negative for all samples in our trial. It should be noted that the MMP9 primer pair amplifies human RNA22. Additionally to MMP2, gene expression was found for MMP3 (sample 3), MMP13 (samples 2, 15, 17, and 19), and TIMP1 (samples 2 and 3). Presence of MMP3, MMP13, and TIMP1 in cholesteatoma cells had been reported previously3,16,13.

Despite the progress observed in nucleic acid analysis techniques, only two papers in the specific literature have used RT-PCR to look into gene expression of MMPs and their inhibitors. The lack of papers on the presence of MMP and TIMP mRNA in cholesteatomas may be explained by the technical difficulties inherent to processing RNA from cholesteatoma specimens also experienced in this study.

The detection of MMP isoenzymes by histochemistry or RT-PCR does not imply that the enzymes are active, as metalloproteinases are synthesized in an inactive form. They become active catalysts only after partial proteolysis, i.e., they are zymogens10. MMP enzymatic activity in biologic samples is verified in a laboratory setting through separation by electrophoresis followed by gel hydrolysis in a technique called zymography. This is a complex standardization technique, fraught with conflicting results from different research groups. Such issue was observed for MMP2, as the zymograms in two papers failed to verify increased enzymatic activity in cholesteatoma fragments10,26, while more recent studies carried out by three other groups detected gelatinolytic activity in the isoenzyme1,8,16. Controversy also looms over MMP9 analysis: increased activity was reported in two studies8,10 and baseline activity in one other paper13. Additionally to these two isoforms, MMP1 and MMP3 activity in cholesteatomas were also assessed through zymography, and increased activity was seen only in the first isoenzyme13.

A literature review on MMP alteration in cholesteatomas reveals that there still is much to be explored in characterizing these enzymes as disease markers. The use of RT-PCR with such end has been almost completely disregarded until recently. This technique could be further utilized to quickly analyze the various yet unexplored isoforms from the MMP family that could have altered expression in cholesteatomas. And TIMP inhibitors have been barely studied to date, despite their role in controlling MMP activity.

Gene expression analysis by RT-PCR of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors offers significant technical difficulties. Studies comprising larger numbers of patients or considering a greater number of variables might allow for stronger clinical correlations with the expression of these genes in cholesteatomas.

 

CONCLUSION

Gene expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors has been verified in cholesteatomas. RT-PCR detected mRNA in MMP2, MMP3, MMP3, and TIMP1, but not in MMP9. However, differences in MMP and TIMP expression associated with disease aggressiveness were not found.

 

REFERENCES

1. Laeeq S, Faust R. Modeling the cholesteatoma microenvironment: coculture of HaCaT keratinocytes with WS1 Fibroblasts induces MMP-2 activation, invasive phenotype, and proteolysis of the extracellular matrix. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(2):313-8.         [ Links ]

2. Khujadze M, Vashakidze N, Gogniashvili G, Khelashvili B. The results of surgical treatment of middle ear cholesteatoma by using open and closed techniques. Georgian Med News. 2008;(163):21-4.         [ Links ]

3. Kobayashi H, Asano K, Kanai K, Suzaki H. Suppressive activity of vitamin D3 on matrix metalloproteinase production from cholesteatoma keratinocytes in vitro. Mediators Inflamm. 2005;2005(4):210-5        [ Links ]

4. Ricciardiello F, Cavaliere M, Mesolella M, Iengo M. Notes on the microbiology of cholesteatoma: clinical findings and treatment. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2009;29(4):197-202.         [ Links ]

5. Morales DSR, Penido NO, Silva IDCG, Stávale JN, Guilherme A, Fukuda Y. Matrix Metalloproteinase 2: an important genetic marker for cholesteatomas. Braz J Otorhinolaringol. 2007;73(1):55-61.         [ Links ]

6. Alves AL, Pereira CSB, Ribeiro FAQ, Fregnani JHTG. Analysis of histopathological aspects in acquired middle ear cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(6):835-41.         [ Links ]

7. Shibosawa E, Tsutsumi K, Takakuwa T, Takahashi S. Stromal expression of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in middle ear cholesteatomas. Am J Otol. 2000;21(5):621-4.         [ Links ]

8. Suchozebrska-Jesionek D, Szymański M, Kurzepa J, Gołabek W, Stryjecka-Zimmer M. Gelatinolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in middle ear cholesteatoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37(5):628-32.

9. Hamajima Y, Komori M, Preciado DA, Choo DI, Moribe K, Murakami S, Ondrey FG, et al. The role of inhibitor of DNA-binding (Id1) in hyperproliferation of keratinocytes: the pathological basis for middle ear cholesteatoma from chronic otitis media. Cell Prolif. 2010;43(5):457-63.         [ Links ]

10. Schmidt M, Grünsfelder P, Hoppe F. Induction of matrix metalloproteinases in keratinocytes by cholesteatoma debris and granulation tissue extracts. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(8):425-9.         [ Links ]

11. Vitale RF, Ribeiro FAQ. The role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in bone resorption present in middle ear cholesteatoma. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;73(1):123-7.         [ Links ]

12. Juhász A, Sziklai I, Rákosy Z, Ecsedi S, Ádány R, Balázs M. Elevated level of tenascin and matrix metalloproteinase 9 correlates with the bone destruction capacity of cholesteatomas. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30(4):559-65.         [ Links ]

13. Banerjee AR, James R, Narula AA. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 and matrix metalloproteinase-9 in cholesteatoma and deep meatal skin. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1998;23(4):345-7.         [ Links ]

14. Schmidt M, Grünsfelder P, Hoppe F. Up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 in middle ear cholesteatoma - correlations with growth factor expression in vivo? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2001;258(9):472-6.         [ Links ]

15. Sternlicht MD, Werb Z. How metalloproteinases regulate cell behavior. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2001;17:463-516.         [ Links ]

16. Mehta D, Daudia A, Birchall JP, Banerjee AR. The localization of matrix metalloproteinases-8 and -13 in cholesteatoma, deep-meatal and post-auricular skin: a comparative analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007;127(2):138-42.         [ Links ]

17. Schönermark M, Mester B, Kempf HG, Bläser J, Tschesche H, Lenarz T. Expression of matrix-metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human cholesteatomas. Acta Otolaryngol. 1996;116(3):451-6.         [ Links ]

18. Visse R, Nagase H. Matrix metalloproteinases and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases: structure, function, and biochemistry. Circ Res. 2003;92(8):827-39.         [ Links ]

19. Migirov L, Weissburd S, Wolf M. Mastoidectomy in the elderly. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2010;72(2):80-3.         [ Links ]

20. Cervo AL, Bervian PA. Metodologia científica. 5. ed. São Paulo: Prentice Hall. 2002. 242p.         [ Links ]

21. Theodoro TR, de Matos LL, Sant Anna AV, Fonseca FL, Semedo P, Martins LC, et al. Heparanase expression in circulating lymphocytes of breast cancer patients depends on the presence of the primary tumor and/or systemic metastasis. Neoplasia. 2007;9(6):504-10.         [ Links ]

22. Konttinen YT, Ainola M, Valleala H, Ma J, Ida H, Mandelin J, et al. Analysis of 16 different matrix metalloproteinases (MMP-1 to MMP-20) in the synovial membrane: different profiles in trauma and rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58(11):691-7.         [ Links ]

23. Holt JJ. Cholesteatoma and otosclerosis: two slowly progressive causes of hearing loss treatable through corrective surgery. Clin Med Res. 2003;1(2):151-4.         [ Links ]

24. De S, Fenton JE, Jones AS. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in non-neoplastic otorhinolaryngological disease. J Laryngol Otol. 2005;119(6):436-42.         [ Links ]

25. Lehman DA, Wilmoth JG, Prevatt AR, Schultz GS, Antonelli PJ. Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinases in gerbil cholesteatoma: preliminary findings. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126(4):404-8.         [ Links ]

26. Banerjee AR, Jones JL, Birchall JP, Powe DG. Localization of matrix metalloproteinase 1 in cholesteatoma and deep meatal skin. Otol Neurotol. 2001;22(5):579-81.         [ Links ]

 

 

Send correspondence to:
Faculdade de Medicina do ABC
Av. Príncipe de Gales,821
Santo André - SP. CEP: 09060-650
Av. Pereira Barreto, 1395, cj 34. Torre Norte, Bairro Paraíso
Santo André - SP. CEP: 09190-610
E-mail: carlosbrezende@ig.com.br

Paper submitted to the BJORL-SGP (Publishing Management System - Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology) on January 12, 2012; and accepted on February 26, 2012. cod. 8985
This study was sponsored by the Center for Studies, Research and Support to Health (NEPAS). L.C. and M.B.G. were granted scholarships from PIBIC-CNPq.