SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 número4Avaliação da fadiga na esclerose múltipla: qualidade metodológica das versões originais adaptadas no Brasil dos instrumentos de autorrelato índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Fisioterapia e Pesquisa

versão impressa ISSN 1809-2950

Fisioter. Pesqui. vol.21 no.4 São Paulo out./dez. 2014

http://dx.doi.org/10.590/1809-2950/11511921042014 

Systematic Review

Mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit: systematic review

Movilización en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos: revisión sistemática

Vanessa Salgado Silva 1  

Juliana Gonçalves Pinto 2  

Bruno Prata Martinez 3  

Fernanda Warken Rosa Camelier 4  

1Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA); Secretaria Municipal da Saúde de Salvador (SMS) - Salvador (BA), Brazil

2FSBA - Salvador (BA), Brazil

3Hospital Aliança; Universidade do Estado da Bahia (UNEB) - Salvador (BA), Brazil

4Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP); UNEB - Salvador (BA), Brazil

ABSTRACT

Prolonged stay in the Intensive Care Unit and mechanical ventilation are associated with functional decline, increased morbidity and mortality, and healthcare costs. The early mobilization seems to have beneficial effects on these factors. The aim of this study was to systematize knowledge about early mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit. This is a systematic review, with inclusion of clinical trials published between 1998 and 2012. We used the scale Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Eight studies were included and analyzed. It was concluded that early mobilization in the Intensive Care Unit has a significant impact on patients' functional outcomes.

Key words: Early Ambulation; Exercise; Intensive Care Units; Rehabilitation; Physical Therapy Modalities

RESUMEN

La permanencia prolongada en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos y la ventilación mecánica están asociadas a la caída funcional, al aumento de morbidad y mortalidad y a los costos asistenciales. La movilización precoz parece tener efectos benéficos en esos factores. El objetivo del presente estudio fue sistematizar el conocimiento acerca de la movilización precoz en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos. Se trata de una revisión sistemática, con la inclusión de ensayos clínicos publicados entre el 1998 y el 2012. Se utilizó la escala Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) para evaluación de la cualidad metodológica de las investigaciones. Ocho estudios fueron inclusos y analizados. Se concluye que la movilización precoz en la Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos presentó un impacto significativamente positivo en los resultados funcionales de los pacientes.

Palabras-clave: Ambulación Precoz; Ejercicio; Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos; Rehabilitación; Modalidades de Fisioterapia

INTRODUCTION

The technological and scientific evolution of advanced life support and health care, with subsequent improvement in the treatment, has played an important role in the conversion of mortality in longer survival of patients1 - 3. There are, increasingly, survivors of critical illness whose complications of prolonged stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) contribute to neuromuscular disorders, worsening of functional abilities, increased healthcare costs and decreased quality of life after hospital discharge4 , 5.

The muscular dysfunction can be aggravated by the consequences of disease, sedation and immobility in bed, as well as inadequate intensity and duration of physical rehabilitation5 , 6. The frequency and severity of neuromuscular weakness and its symptoms can be alleviated, using alternatives, such as early mobilization (EM) for the prevention and treatment of such complications7.

Early physical therapy, including during intubation and mechanical ventilation, can be carried out safely improving the functional outcomes of patients2 , 4 , 8. Given the need for knowledge about the effects of mobilization in the ICU, this study aimed to systematize knowledge about the EM in an intensive care environment and its impact, especially on the functional aspects and stay on mechanical ventilation (MV) and ICU.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic review and literature survey was conducted in the Medline, LILACS, SciELO and Cochrane databases, in the English and Portuguese languages, of studies published between 1998 and 2012. The keywords used were "early ambulation" OR "exercise" OR "rehabilitation" OR "physical therapy modalities" AND "Intensive Care Units" with correlates in Portuguese. Only trials with control group (CG) and full availability of access which evaluated the effect of EM in the ICU in adult humans above 18 years old were included. Studies using other resources, such as orthostatic board and electrostimulation not associated with Physical therapy were excluded. Analysis of titles and abstracts of investigations were carried out by two independent evaluators, and a third was triggered in the absence of consensus.

The selected clinical trials were assessed by the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro)9 scale to evaluate the methodological quality using 11 pre-selected items, with scores from 0 to 10. The trials not indexed on this scale were rated by two evaluators that applied in a independent way. In the absence of consensus, a third reviewer undertook the analysis. These were physical therapists, being an expert, one graduate student and one Post Doctor with extensive experience in the studied area. The scale score was not used as a criterion for inclusion/exclusion of articles, but as an indicator of scientific evidence.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

There were found 875 studies, and, in the final selection, eight trials were included as shown in the diagram that can be seen in Figure 1, whose characteristics are found in Chart 1.

Figure 1. Diagram of the selection of articles 

Chart 1. Description of selected studies IG: Intervention Group; CG: control group; MV: mechanical ventilation; LL: lower limbs; ICU: Intensive Care Unit; MS: muscular strength; MRC: Medical Research Council; MIP: maximal inspiratory pressure; MEP: maximal expiratory pressure; UL: upper limbs; ADL: activities of daily living; FIM: Functional Independence Measure; 6MWT: the six-minute walk test; SF-36, Short Form Health Survey; ARF: acute respiratory failure; TQT: tracheostomy; CRF: chronic respiratory failure; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; FES: Functional electrostimulation; RR: respiratory rate; HR: heart rate; TMR: respiratory muscle training 

All investigations achieved a score ≥ 4 in the PEDro scale. Six addressed the influence of EM on the functionality10 - 15, five on peripheral muscle strength (MS)10 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 16, four on respiratory MS3 , 15 - 17 and seven over the duration of MV and of ICU and hospital permanence period10 - 13 , 15 - 17. Five dealt with aspects such as feasibility and safety of mobilization in the ICU12, dyspnea15 , 17, muscle fatigue17, mortality11 and hospital costs12. The sample size ranged from 24 to 330 individuals of both genders, with a mean of 50 to 79 years, admitted in European11 , 14 , 15 , 17, US10 , 12, Asian13, and Brazilian16 ICUs.

Generalized weakness, decreased functional status and its impacts on quality of life represent complications of prolonged stay in ICU4. The present study analyzed the outcomes of MS, functionality, and length of hospital stay in MV related to EM in the ICU, and favorable responses were observed.

Muscular strength

Reviewed studies indicate gain of peripheral MS measured by the dynamometer10 , 11 , 13 or manual muscle test (Medical Research Council - MRC)10 , 14 , 16 in chronically ventilated patients after a rehabilitation program. One trial found an increase in the scale of strength (MRC) in the Treatment Group (TG), with an average gain of 6.6 (49±11 to 55±4, p=0.04), whereas the Countrol Group (CG) obtained 1.0 (39±14 to 40±10, p=0.82)16. Another study of critically ill patients who used the cycle ergometer in the lower limbs (LL) as a resource rehabilitation, beyond the normal physical interventions, demonstrated increased quadriceps MS between ICU and the hospital, discharges more relevant in TG (1.8 versus 2.3 N/kg- 1, p<0.01) than in CG (1.8 versus 2.0 N/kg, p<0.11)11. The literature suggests that the immobilization is an important cause of muscle weakness in mechanically ventilated patients, whose physical training could reverse and prevent this effect, as demonstrated in a clinical trial in which MS continued to deteriorate for six weeks in the CG13. The lack of a random distribution of patients and the lack of analysis of the intention to treat were negative aspects related to the quality of this study.

In relation to the amount and intensity of mobilization in the ICU, studies report frequency of once or twice a day, five to seven days per week for up to six weeks, and individual progression of intensity by the Borg scale for perceived exertion, ranging from 10 to 13 points10 , 11 , 13 , 16. In a study of deconditioned and ventilated for long periods individuals, the intensity of the effort ranged from 10 to 11 in the first week, progressing to 12 to 13 until the fifth week13. Another analysis with vented and more acute patients progressed the activity levels (bed, sedestation, orthostasis, ambulation and walked distance), doing physical therapy for 0.3 hours/day until discharge from the ICU10. The reviewed studies do not report the resistance imposed on exercises, the number of sets and repetitions performed, making the comparison between them and a possible standardization difficult.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has been used as a resource for the preservation of muscle mass in critically ill patients and for the recovery of MS during rehabilitation14 , 17. By comparing the effects of active mobilization with and without FES in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), there was MS improvement in both groups (p<0.05), though higher in the TG (p=0.02), demonstrating additional effects in the rehabilitation of FES14. One study found no significant difference between the TG and CG, respectively, on peripheral MS (MRC of 52 and 48, p=0.09) and handgrip (39 and 35 kg-force, p=0.67) on hospital discharge10. However, its intervention focused on the performance of functional tasks until the return to an independent status (Barthel>70) or hospital discharge, and did not use resistance exercises, which may have influenced the low gain in the MS. Another study also found no difference in grip strength between the groups (p=0.83), probably because of its intervention was centered on the lower limbs11.

Association between strength and function was observed in some studies11 , 14. Positive correlation between the six-minute walk test (6MWT) with quality of life (SF-36) (p<0.001; r=0.55) and quadriceps MS (p=0.002; r=0.40), and the last one with the SF-36 (p<0.001; r=0.46) at discharge, was identified by a study that used the LL cycle ergometer in critically ill patients. This correlation suggests that the quadriceps MS can contribute to the performance of the walk and the feeling of functional well-being11. In this study11, the quadriceps MS variable showed greater gains in TG compared to CG, between ICU and hospital discharges (1.83±0.91 versus 2.37±0.62 N/kg- 1 and p<0.01 in TG; 1.86±0.78 versus 2.03±0.75 N/kg- 1 and p=0.11, in the CG). The TG also had higher values on the 6MWT compared to CG at discharge (196 [126-329] versus 143 m [37-226], p<0.05) and the SF-36 (21 [18-23] versus 15 points [14-23], p<0.01). However, these values can not be considered different due to the intersection of the confidence intervals11. Another study in patients with COPD bedridden that received MV and used FES observed gain of MS compared to CG (2.16±1.02 versus 1.25±0.75, p=0.02) and reduced the number of days required for bed-chair transfer compared to individuals who did not use the technique (10.75±2.41 versus 14.33±2.53, p=0.001)14.

Additionally, studies have observed an improvement in inspiratory MS represented by the increase in maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) after the exercise program associated with diaphragmatic breathing13 (46 to 60 cmH2O, p<0.05), respiratory muscle training with linear load15 (45±1 to 61±1 cmH2O, p<0.05), lower limb cycle ergometer16 (52±1 to 66±2 cmH2O, p=0.02) and upper limb (UL)18 (43±1 to 52±2 cmH2O, p<0.001). A possible limitation of these studies, for ethical reasons, it was the lack of a real CG, in which no rehabilitation program was conducted.

Functionality

Clinical trials demonstrated increased functional independence through the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) after rehabilitation in patients on MV10.13. One study reported that FIM appears to be more sensitive to detect changes that the Barthel, however few have reported what constitutes a clinically significant change on these scales13.

Increased number of daily life activities and walked distance at hospital discharge were observed by a study in which a return to the pre-independent morbidity was observed in 59% of TG compared to 35% in the CG (p=0.02; OR=2.7; 95%CI 1.2-6.1)10. Another study with individuals unable to walk on admission showed, after six weeks of physical training, that 53% of TG regained their ability to walk, with average distance traveled in two minutes 42.9±12.7 m (n=9), unlike CG, which remained bedridden and unable to walk at the end of the study13. A third analysis in patients with COPD in the ICU for respiratory care showed that 87% regained their walking independence after the rehabilitation program15. Despite improvement in the studies cited, the discrepancy in the values of the treatment effect is due, probably, the heterogeneity of the populations studied and the percentage of ventilated patients.

Delayed onset of physical rehabilitation during MV was associated with worse performance after ICU discharge19. A significant improvement in the supine-sedestation-orthostasis transfer activities after EM program14 , 19 , 20, as well as gains in the time necessary to first leaving the bed in the TG (5 versus 11 days, p<0.001)12 have been observed in patients on MV. One study showed shorter time to bed-chair transfer (10 versus 14 days, p=0.001) in COPD patients mobilized with the addition of FES of the lower limbs, reflecting improved functional capacity and quality of life14.

The use of the cycle ergometer in the lower limbs in addition to standard intervention resulted in improved self-perceived functional status (SF-36) compared to CG at discharge (21 versus 15 points, p<0.01). In this study11, the authors found no difference between groups on the ICU and the hospital discharges in the ability to orthostasis through the Berg scale ≥2 (p=0.4; p=0.7), and independent ambulation through functional classification ≥4 (p=0.72; p=0.18)11. In contrast, the TG patients had greater distance walked at hospital discharge (196 versus 143 m, p<0.05) independently (73 versus 55%), with a trend towards greater need for rehabilitation after discharge in the CG (17 versus 10%), although not significantly11. Some limitations of this study are the small sample size and the lack of rigorous standardization during time on emergency, in which TG had higher time on the ICU before inclusion in the study (14 versus 10 days, p<0.05), with longer period of intravenous sedation (11 versus 8 days, p<0.05). These, added to the fact that TG has had the application of cycle ergometer in the lower limbs as the unic differentiated conduct of the CG, may have influenced their statistical significance.

Ambulation increase after transfer of ventilated patients to the ICU, where the activity is the care's goal, was verified by a study (p<0.001). The authors reported that sedatives, even if intermittent, reduced the likelihood of ambulation and showed that the ICU can contribute to unnecessary immobilization, with consequent physical dysfunction (p=0.009; OR=1.9; 95%CI 1.1-3 1)19. Another study observed increased in mobility after improving the quality of physical therapy and rehabilitation services in the ICU, resulting in reduction of sedatives and greater alert state of patients (p=0.03)20. Clinical trials that conducted rehabilitation program in the ICU observed an increase in walked distance and ambulation ability at discharge, suggesting that the MV does not prevent the acquisition of mobility10 , 11 , 13 , 15.

Internment/ventilation

Shorter ICU (5.5 versus 6.9 days, p<0.025) and hospital (11.2 versus 14.5 days, p<0.006) stay were observed in a study in patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF), without an increase in costs14. Although other studies11 , 15 , 16 observed fewer hospital days in the TG, this difference was not significant relative to the length of stay in ICU and hospital, probably because of the small sample size of these studies.

The time of weaning was analyzed only for a clinical trial, which found no difference between the TG (exercises and cycle ergometer) and the CG (exercises) of critically ill patients (6 versus 6 days p=0.40)11. Significant reduction in the time of weaning after the rehabilitation program was noted by a study in a multidisciplinary unit, in which 30% of patients were weaned within seven days, showing inverse correlation between UL MS and weaning time (r=0.72 and p<0.001), in which, for each point gained in the range of MS (MRC), there was a decreased in seven days of the time of weaning21. The discrepancy between the findings may be due to the longer period of sedation in ICU before the TG inclusion in the study, and the differentiation of CG only through the use of cycle ergometer. However, despite no significant improvement in the weaning time, the trial identified improvement in the 6MWD, in quadriceps MS and the quality of life.

An analysis found that daily interruption of sedation combined with physical therapy and early occupational in mechanically ventilated patients resulted in more ventilator free days (23.5 versus 21.1 days, p=0.05)10. Another trial with patients undergoing prolonged MV (52 and 46 days in the TG and CG, respectively) also showed increased in MV free time in the TG (8.9 versus 4.8 hours, p<0.01), with greater removal capacity of the ventilator during at least 12 hours/day (47 versus 20%)13. This study13 found correlations between the VM free time and functional outcome (r=0.66), suggesting that the prolonged MV is associated with worsening functional performance, so physical training should not be underestimated in these patients.

Other aspects

Low occurrence of adverse events after exercise protocol was observed by a clinical trial demonstrating safety and feasibility without increasing costs12. As for symptoms, studies show a reduction in dyspnea15 , 18 and muscle fatigue18 after early training in patients recovering from ARF.

Although prolonged period on MV is associated with a greater decline in physical function compared to cognitive, one study found an increase in the cognitive domain scores in the TG, with significant deterioration in the CG, after physical training in patients undergoing prolonged MV13. Another study found that the daily interruption of sedation and early physical and occupational therapies in critical patients on MV resulted in shorter duration of delirium (2 versus 4 days; p=0.02)10. These findings demonstrate the relation between neuromuscular and cognitive functions and the EM importance for the preservation of these systems.

Additionally, studies found higher hospital mortality in CG (25 versus 18%, p=0.53010 and 18.2 versus 12.1%, p=0.12512) compared to TG that made EM, although not significantly. Another study evaluated the mortality rates during hospitalization (24 versus 16%) and one year after discharge (10 versus 8%), whereas they were higher in the TG, but with no significant difference between groups (p=0.29) and no association of the causes of death reported by intensivists with proposals interventions11.

The key factors that influenced the quality of the studies reviewed were: lack of randomisation, blindiness of the evaluators, adequate monitoring and analysis of the intention to treat11 - 16 , 18.

CONCLUSION

EM in the ICU seems to minimize the loss of functional abilities, with favorable results for the prevention and treatment of neuromuscular disorders resulting from increased survival of patients and prolonged permanence in bed, as demonstrated by studies of this review. Its use in clinical practice seems to be feasible and safe, being able to promote improvement in functional capacity, quality of life, peripheral and respiratory MS, and reduced length of stay and MV. It is suggested the realization of clinical trials with greater standardization for description and comparison of different treatment protocols in order to identify the frequency, dose, intensity and types of therapeutic exercises needed to improve outcomes associated with physical therapy.

REFERENCES

1. Maclntyre NR, Cook DJ, Ely EW Jr, Epstein SK, Fink JB, Heffner JE, et al. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American college of chest physicians; the American association for respiratory care; and the American college of critical care medicine. Chest. 2001;120(6 Suppl):S375-96. [ Links ]

2. França EE, Ferrari F, Fernandes P, Cavalcanti R, Duarte A, Martinez BP, et al. Fisioterapia em pacientes críticos adultos: recomendações do departamento de fisioterapia da associação de medicina intensiva brasileira. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2012;24(1):6-22. [ Links ]

3. Adler J, Malone D. Early mobilization in the intensive care unit: a systematic review. Cardiopulm Phys Ther J. 2012;23(1):5-13. [ Links ]

4. Soares TR, Avena KM, Olivieri FM, Feijó LF, Mendes KM, Souza Filho SA, et al. Retirada do leito após a descontinuação da ventilação mecânica: há repercussão na mortalidade e no tempo de permanência na unidade de terapia intensiva? Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2010;22(1):27-32. [ Links ]

5. Herridge MS. Legacy of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):457-61S. [ Links ]

6. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, et al. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(8):683-93. [ Links ]

7. Fletcher SN, Kennedy DD, Ghosh IR, Misra VP, Kiff K, Coakley JH, et al. Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(4):1012-6. [ Links ]

8. Montagnani G, Vagheggini G, Vlad EP, Berrighi D, Pantani L, Ambrosino N. Use of the functional independence measure in people for whom mechanical ventilation is difficult. Phys Ther. 2011;91(7):1109-15. [ Links ]

9. Physiotherapy Evidence Database [Internet]. Sydney: PEDro; c1999-2006 [cited 2012 Aug 20]. Disponível em: http://www.pedro.org.au. [ Links ]

10. Schweickert WD, Pohlman MC, Pohlman AS, Nigos C, Pawlik AJ, Esbrook CL, et al. Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9678):1874-82. [ Links ]

11. Burtin C, Clerckx B, Robbeets C, Ferdinande P, Langer D, Troosters T, et al. Early exercise in critically ill patients enhances short-term functional recovery. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(9):1-7. [ Links ]

12. Morris PE, Goad A, Thompson C, Taylor K, Harry B, Passmore L, et al. Early intensive care unit mobility therapy in the treatment of acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(8):1-6. [ Links ]

13. Chiang L, Wang L, Wu C, Wu H, Wu Y. Effects of physical training on functional status in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation. Phys Ther. 2006;86(9):1271-81. [ Links ]

14. Zanotti E, Felicetti G, Maini M, Fracchia C. Peripheral muscle strength training in bed-bound patients with COPD receiving mechanical ventilation: effect of electrical stimulation. Chest. 2006;124(1):292-6. [ Links ]

15. Nava S. Rehabilitation of patients admitted to a respiratory intensive care unit. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(7):849-54. [ Links ]

16. Dantas CM, Silva PF, Siqueira FH, Pinto RM, Matias S, Maciel C, et al. Influência da mobilização precoce na força muscular periférica e respiratória em pacientes críticos. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2006;24(2):173-8. [ Links ]

17. Gerovasili V, Stefanidis K, Vitzilaios K, Karatzanos E, Politis P, Koroneos A, et al. Electrical muscle stimulation preserves the muscle mass of critically ill patients: a randomized study. Crit Care. 2009;13(5):161-8. [ Links ]

18. Porta R, Vitacca M, Gilè LS, Clini E, Bianchi L, Zanotti E, et al. Supported arm training in patients recently weaned from mechanical ventilation. Chest. 2005;128(4):2511-20. [ Links ]

19. Thomsen GE, Snow GL, Rodriguez L, Hopkins RO. Patients with respiratory failure increase ambulation after transfer to an intensive care unit where early activity is a priority. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1119-24. [ Links ]

20. Needham DM, Korupolu R, Zanni JM, Pradhan P, Colantuoni E, Palmer JB, et al. Early physical medicine and rehabilitation for patients with acute respiratory failure: a quality improvement project. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(4):536-42. [ Links ]

21. Martin UJ, Hincapie L, Nimchuk M, Gaughan J, Criner GJ. Impact of whole-body rehabilitation in patients receiving chronic mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2005;33(10):2259-65. [ Links ]

Study conducted at the Graduate Program in Fisioterapia Hospitalar of the Faculdade Social da Bahia (FSBA) - Salvador (BA), Brazil.

Financing source: none

Received: September 2013; Accepted: March 2014

Correspondence to: Vanessa Salgado Silva - Universidade Federal da Bahia - Avenida Reitor Miguel Calmon, s/n - Vale do Canela - CEP: 40110-100 - Salvador (BA), Brazil - E-mail: vanessa.salgado@ufba.br

Conflict of interests: nothing to declare.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.