Combined effect of physical activity and reduction of screen time for overweight prevention in adolescents

Efeito combinado da atividade física e redução do tempo de tela para prevenção do excesso de peso em adolescentes

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to identify the association between combined effect of physical activity, reduction of screen time and overweight in adolescents. The sample of this cross-sectional study consisted of 613 adolescents, aged 15-18 years living in a municipality in northeastern Brazil. Physical activity was measured using the short-version IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), and screen time was verified through two questions about the time that, on average, interviewees watched television, played video games, used the cell phone or computer on a normal weekday and one weekend day. The predictive power and cutoff points of screen time and physical activity for the outcome of interest were identified using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. Different logistic regression models were proposed, with excess weight as dependent variable. In all models, the combination of little physical activity and long screen time was used as reference. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was used. In boys, the combination of physical activity and short screen time on a weekend day was inversely associated with overweight (OR = 0.31; 0.12-0.85). The combined effect of physical activity and reduced time spent watching TV, computer screen and similar devices on a weekend day is inversely associated with overweight in boys.

Key words
Overweight; Physical activity; Sedentary lifestyle

Resumo

O principal objetivo deste trabalho foi identificar a associação entre o efeito combinado da atividade física e redução do tempo de tela com excesso de peso em adolescentes. O estudo foi transversal com amostra composta por 613 adolescentes, com idade entre 15 a 18 anos residentes em município do nordeste do Brasil. A atividade física foi medida por meio do IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), versão curta e o tempo de tela foi verificado por meio de duas questões sobre o tempo que, em média o entrevistado assistia televisão, jogava videogame, usava o celular ou o computador em um dia de semana normal e em um dia no final de semana. O poder preditivo e os pontos de corte do tempo de tela e da atividade física para o desfecho de interesse foram identificados por meio das curvas Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC). Foram propostos ainda diferentes modelos de regressão logística tendo o excesso de peso como variável dependente. Em todos os modelos de análise foi fixada como referência a combinação pouca atividade física e muito tempo de tela. Utilizou-se intervalo de confiança (IC) a 95%. Em rapazes, a combinação atividade física e pouco tempo de tela em um dia do final de semana foi inversamente associada ao excesso de peso (OR = 0,31; 0,12-0,85). O efeito combinado da atividade física e redução do tempo sentado frente a TV, tela de computador e assemelhados em um dia no final de semana está inversamente associado ao excesso de peso em rapazes.

Palavras-chave
Atividade física; Estilo de vida sedentário; Sobrepeso

INTRODUCTION

Physical activity has been widely discussed by the scientific community, especially due to its inverse association with non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) in both adults and adolescents¹-³.

In the early 1990s, in order to create a model of guidance on physical activity for adults, the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) published recommendations about physical activity, advising the accumulation of at least 30 minutes of moderate activity on most or every day of the week⁴. For children and adolescents, physical activity is recommended for approximately 60 minutes every day or most days of the week⁵-⁸.

In addition, there is also strong evidence that sedentary behaviors, particularly those related to technology such as watching television, playing mobile or video games, and computer use, i.e., screen time, are important risk factors for metabolic and cardiovascular disorders and need to be investigated as much as levels of physical activity⁹-¹⁴.

Recent research conducted in Australia has shown that prolonged sitting time is a risk factor for all-cause mortality regardless of regular physical activity¹⁵. In the specific case of children and adolescents, studies have shown that having television in the bedroom and / or remaining sitting watching television for more than two hours / day is positively associated with overweight¹⁶,¹⁷, and there is evidence that excessive sitting hours have association with several obesity markers and metabolic / cardiovascular risk¹⁸.

The main mechanisms that could explain the association between screen time and metabolic and cardiovascular health point to reductions in muscle lipoprotein lipase activity (LPL) during sedentary activity. Low LPL activity levels seem to be associated with a large decrease in the absorption of plasma triglycerides by skeletal muscles, causing fats to be deposited in vessels or adipose tissue, thus contributing to excess weight¹⁹.

Studies addressing the combined effect of increased physical activity and reduced screen time to prevent overweight should be conducted since the existence of active behavior through physical activity does not guarantee the necessary protection for the occurrence of health problems related to sedentary behavior. These studies can make important contributions to public health, as policies to encourage changes in both behaviors can be implemented for the adolescent population. Thus, the present study aimed to identify the association between the combined effect of physical activity and reduction of screen time and overweight in adolescents.

METHOD

This is a cross-sectional, home survey type study, which is part of the “Assessing the effects of the Family Health Strategy: adopting healthy habits and accessibility to primary health promotion services and risk and health prevention” research, a household survey of young people aged 15-24 years conducted in the municipality of Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil, whose sample design was detailed in a previous publication²⁰.

Considering the specific characteristics of the theme and the influence of age, the present study analyzed adolescents aged 15-18 years, representing 45% (n = 769) of the sample. After excluding individuals who did not undergo a complete anthropometric assessment or who did not answer questions related to screen time, a total of 613 individuals, 275 (44.8%) males and 338 (55.2%) females remained in the sample. All study participants or their legal guardians signed an informed consent form and the project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Institute of Collective Health, Protocol No. 019-09 / CEP-ISC.

For the present study, the following independent variables were used:

1. Screen time, defined in hours and verified by two questions about the average time the respondent watched television, played video games, used mobile or computer on a normal weekday and in one weekend day;

2. Physical activity measured by the short-version IPAQ (International Physical Activity Questionnaire), consisting of questions about frequency and duration of physical activities (walking, moderate and vigorous PA)²¹. Physical activity values ​​were reported in minutes / week by multiplying the weekly frequency by the duration of each activity performed.

Overweight was used as dependent variable and analyzed through body mass index (BMI) and identified through percentiles proposed by Cole et al.²². To identify overweight, those who were both overweight and obese were included.

The following covariates were analyzed: gender; age, calculated from the informed date of birth, consumption of soft drinks, sweets and fried foods.

Daily consumption of soft drinks, sweets and fried foods was assessed through the following questions from the Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ): 1) "How often do you usually consume (food name)?", with alternatives for weekly [("every day", "5 to 6 days", "3 to 4 days", "1 to 2 days") or monthly consumption ("1 to 3 times a month" or "no consumption"]. FFQ has been validated in Brazilian adolescents presenting Pearson correlation coefficients, after being adjusted and corrected for variability, ranging from 0.10 to 0.72 for girls and 0.16 and 0.91 for boys²³.

Data collection was performed between October 2011 and January 2012. It consisted of applying a structured instrument by a team of trained interviewers, accompanied by field supervisors and anthropometric measurements by field supervisors trained by a nutritionist. Supervisors were health professionals and interviewers were undergraduate students. All collection procedures were tested by conducting a pilot study in the same municipality, in an unsorted area, which reproduced the entire field routine.

The comparison between genders for continuous variables was made by the Student's t-test for independent samples and for categorical variables using the chi-square independence test. The cutoff point used for physical activity was determined based on the analysis of ROC curves proposed in the present study. The cutoff point of 4 hours / day for screen time proposed in a recent publication was used by our research group²⁰. Then, different logistic regression models were proposed with overweight as the dependent variable. The main independent variables were introduced in each logistic regression model using different combinations between physical activity and screen time. In all analysis models, the combination of low physical activity and long screen time was adopted as reference. In the different models, covariates age, gender and consumption of soft drinks, sweets and fried foods were tested as modifiers of effect and confounding variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed using the backword method based on the complete model and removing one by one the possible confounding variables, which, when deleted from the model, could cause change equal to or greater than 20%. Finally, odds ratio with 95% confidence interval was calculated.

• Model 1

  Dependent variable: Overweight

  Main independent variable: Active and short screen time

  Covariates: All cited above

• Model 2

  Dependent variable: Overweight

  Main independent variable: Active and long screen time

  Covariates: All cited above

• Model 3

  Dependent variable: Overweight

  Main independent variable: Little active and short screen time

  Covariates: All cited above

Predictive power and cutoff point, with their respective sensitivity and specificity of physical activity for overweight, were identified using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves, which are frequently used to determine cutoff points in diagnostic or screening tests²⁴. Nonparametric estimation, with clustered bootstrap, stratified by gender and age, was used to obtain a quantitative measure of physical activity accuracy to discriminate overweight. Bootstrapping corrects the uncertainty of estimates associated with ROC curves by incorporating the cluster sampling process into the estimation methodology²⁵. Data were analyzed using the “STATA” statistical software, version 12.0.

RESULTS

For the purpose of the present study, all adolescents aged 15-18 years who underwent all anthropometric assessment and who answered questions regarding physical activity and screen time totaling 275 boys and 338 girls were analyzed.

The proportion of overweight was 17.8% among boys and 20.4% among girls. The sample characteristics are as shown in Table 1. It was observed that boys have higher absolute weight and height values, are more physically active and spend more time watching TV, computer screen and similar on the weekend compared to girls. Regarding the absolute waist circumference and screen time during the week values, there are no differences between girls and boys. There are also no differences in the proportions of overweight and consumption of fried foods and soft drinks between genders. It is observed that the daily consumption of sweets among girls is higher than that of boys.

Table 1
Mean, standard deviation, minimum, maximum or percentage values ​​of variables analyzed in the study. Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil, 2012

		Boys (n=275)	Girls (n=338)	p
		X ±SD	X ±SD
WEIGHT (kg)		62.6 ± 12.9	57.2 ± 12.3	0.00*
		(37.1-124.2)	(35.6-117.0)
HEIGHT (m)		1.71 ± 0.07	1.61 ± 0.06	0.00*
		(1.49-1.90)	(1.45-1.88)
WAIST (cm)		72.6 ± 8.6	71.5 ± 9.8	0.14
		(40.0-114.5)	(54.9-119.0)
SCREEN TIME (hours / day)
	Weekday	5.8 ± 3.8	5.5 ± 4.0	0.34
		(0.0-20.0)	(0.0-20.0)
	Weekend	6.0 ± 4.6	4.9 ± 4.4	0.00*
		(0.0-20.0)	(0.0-20.0)
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY		204.3 ± 251.3	158.6 ± 157.5
(minutes / week)		(0.0-2241.0)	(0.0-1377.0)	0.00*
CONSUMPTION OF SWEETS
	Every day	101 (35.7%)	161 (46.4%)
	5 to 6 days p / week	52 (18.4%)	45 (12.9%)
	3 to 4 days p / week	41 (14.5%)	61 (17.6%)
	1-2 days p / week	54 (19.1%)	43 (12.4%)
	1 to 3 times per month	19 (6.8%)	16 (4.6%)	0.04*
	No consumption	16 (5.6%)	21 (6.1%)
CONSUMPTION OF FRIED FOODS
Every day		45 (15.9%)	74 (21.3%)
	5 to 6 days p / week	28 (9.9%)	32 (9.2%)
	3 to 4 days p / week	55 (19.5%)	57 (16.4%)
	1-2 days p / week	77 (27.3%)	108 (31.1%)	0.59
	1 to 3 times per month	34 (12.1%)	34 (9.8%)
	No consumption	43 (15.2%)	42 (12.1%)
CONSUMPTION OF SOFT DRINKS
	Every day	111 (39.1%)	136 (39.2%)
	5 to 6 days p / week	40 (14.1%)	42 (12.1%)
	3 to 4 days p / week	56 (19.8%)	68 (19.6%)
	1-2 days p / week	56 (19.8%)	65 (18.7%)	0.97
	1 to 3 times per month	11 (3.9%)	17 (4.9%)
	No consumption	9 (3.2%)	19 (5.5%)

• Note. Kg, kilogram; m, meter; cm, centimeters;
• ^*
  Different values ​​between boys and girls

Table 2 shows the areas under the ROC curve for physical activity as discriminator of the absence of overweight in adolescents of both genders. It is observed that physical activity discriminates the absence of overweight in boys.

Table 2
Areas under the ROC curve and 95% CI of physical activity as discriminator of the absence of overweight in adolescents of both genders, Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil, 2012

	BOYS	GIRLS
PHYSICAL ACTIVITY	0.62 (0.53-0.71) *	0.41 (0.32-0.50)
minutes / week

• Note. ROC = receiver operating characteristic; 95% CI = 95% confidence interval;
• Area under the ROC curve showing discriminatory power for the presence of overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity (Li-IC ≥ 0.50).

Figure 1 shows the cutoff point for physical activity, with its respective sensitivities and specificities, as discriminator of the absence of overweight in boys. It was observed that accumulating more than 137 minutes per week of physical activity discriminates absence of overweight.

Figura
Area under the ROC curve with its respective cutoff point, sensitivity and specificity of physical activity as discriminator of the absence of overweight in boys (15-18 years), Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil, 2012.

Table 3 presents the odds ratios (OR) of the association between physical activity and overweight with screen time in adolescents of both genders. It was observed that in boys, the combination of physical activity and short screen time on a weekend day was inversely associated with overweight with the combination of low physical activity and long screen time as reference.

Table 3
Association of combinations between physical activity and screen time on one day on the week and one day on the weekend and overweight in adolescents of both sexes, Camaçari, Bahia, Brazil, 2012

PHYSICAL ACTIVITY AND SCREEN TIME	BOYS	GIRLS
DAY OF THE WEEK
Little Physical Activity-Long Screen Time	1.00	1.00
Active - Short Screen Time	0.69 (0.27-1.76)	1.30 (0.60-2.84)
Little Physical Activity – Short Screen Time	1.15 (0.47-2.81)	0.93 (0.46-1.88)
Active - Long Screen Time	0.55 (0.24-1.25)	1.19 (0.57-2.46)
WEEKEND DAY
Little Physical Activity - Long Screen Time	1.00	1.00
Active - Short Screen Time	0.31 (0.12-0.85)	0.87 (0.38-1.98)
Little Physical Activity – Short Screen Time	0.68 (0.29-1.63)	1.02 (0.50-2.05)
Active - Long Screen Time	0.55 (0.24-1.23)	1.81 (0.83-3.95)

• Note. Adjusted for consumption of sweets, fried foods and soft drinks

DISCUSSION

This research sought to identify the association between the combined effect of physical activity and screen time with overweight in adolescents of both genders.

Areas under the ROC curve were statistically significant for physical activity as discriminator of overweight in male adolescents. Although the main studies use the reference of 150 minutes per week as a recommendation for physical activity for health benefits in adults²⁶ and approximately 60 minutes every day or most days of the week for children and adolescents⁵-⁸, in our study, we found 137 minutes per week as cutoff point to discriminate overweight in male adolescents, a fact that may reflect the lower level of physical activity found among adolescents involved in the study.

With respect to screen time, a recent publication by our research group has observed areas under the ROC curve with statistical significance for overweight in adolescents. The identification of the cutoff point of 4 hours / day to discriminate the event under analysis was highlighted. These results indicate that screen time discriminates overweight in adolescents and point to the need for actions to reduce this sedentary behavior²⁰.

Independent associations between physical activity⁷ and screen time for overweight²⁷,²⁸ are well documented in literature, but little is known about the combined effect of these behaviors and their association with weight alterations in adolescents. A recent publication showed that the probability of being obese was significantly higher for subgroups classified as low physical activity and long screen time compared to high physical activity and low screen time, especially in boys²⁹.

This study showed similar results for boys when we found an inverse association in the combination of physical activity and short screen time on the weekend with overweight. The fact that no associations were found among girls may be explained by the lower influence of physical activity on overweight in female adolescents, since in our study, the combined effect of physical activity and reduction in screen time was evaluated. In addition, boys have more screen time on weekends than girls, which may have influenced associations only on weekend days.

In a recent systematic review, it was observed that adiposity markers and cardiometabolic risk are positively associated with sedentary behavior in general, especially with sitting time related to computer and television use, and these relationships appear to be mediated by the influence of sedentary food intake behaviors, and also due to a direct metabolic impact of prolonged sitting time¹⁸.

Some authors suggest that sedentary screen-based behaviors, especially watching television, may lead to higher calorie consumption through a variety of mechanisms that increase food intake³⁰, which could contribute to overweight and obesity. In our analysis, associations were adjusted for consumption of sweets, fried foods and soft drinks, which allows inferring that the combination of increased physical activity and reduced screen time can have a protective effect on overweight regardless of food consumption.

The mechanisms by which increased screen time influences overweight are related to reduced lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity that decreases the absorption of plasma triglycerides, mainly by skeletal muscles¹⁹. Thus, fats are deposited in vessels or adipose tissue, contributing to weight gain.

As the main limitation of this work, we can highlight the construction of the screen time variable from self-reported information, which may have underestimated sedentary behavior, as well as information about physical activity, as it was also obtained through questionnaires, which, however, is an instrument widely used in national and international studies. In addition, the use of the 137 min / week cutoff point of physical activity to discriminate overweight, which despite being found in our own sample, does not correspond to values ​​shown in international literature⁵-⁸. As strength, we can emphasize the analysis of the joint association of physical activity and screen time for overweight, since there are few studies conducted with these characteristics in Brazilian adolescents.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results found in the present study, it could be evidenced that the combined effect of physical activity and reduced time spent watching TV, using computer and similar devices day on a weekend is inversely associated with being overweight, mainly in boys aged 15-18 years.

These results point to the need to expand health promotion actions among young people by incorporating actions to encourage the practice of physical activities and to reduce time spent watching TV, using computer and similar devices, especially in weekend days.

How to cite this article

• Pitanga FJG, Alves CFA, Pamponet ML, Medina MG, Aquino R. Combined effect of physical activity and reduction of screen time for prevention of overweight in adolescent. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2019, 21:e58392. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-0037.2019v21e58392

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

• Funding
  This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-profit sectors. This study was funded by the authors.
• Ethical approval
  Ethical approval was obtained from the local Human Research Ethics Committee – Ethics Research Committee of the Collective HealthInstitute, CEP-ISC/UFBA and the protocol (no. 019-09) was written inaccordance with standards set by the Declaration of Helsinki.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Paffenbarger RS Jr, Lee IM. Physical activity and fitness for health and longevity. Res Q Exerc Sport 1996; 67(3 Suppl):S11-28.
• ²
  Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consensus Development Panelon Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health. JAMA 1996; 276 (3): 241-6.
• ³
  Steele RM, Brage S, Corder K, Wareham NJ, Ekelund U. Physical activity, cardiorespiratory fitness, and the metabolic syndrome in youth. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2008; 105(1):342-51.
• ⁴
  Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, Haskell WL, Macera CA, Bouchard C, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and them American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA 1995; 273(5):402-7
• ⁵
  Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: US. Department of Health and Human Services.
• ⁶
  Cavill N, Biddle S, Sallis F. Health enhancing physical activity for young people: Statement of the United Kingdom Expert Consensus Conference. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2001; 13: 12-25.
• ⁷
  Corbin CB, Pangrazi RP. Physical activity for children: a statement of guidelines for children ages 5-12. Reston, VA: National Association for Sport and Physical Education, 2004.
• ⁸
  Biddle S, Cavil N, Sallis J. Young and Active? Young People and Health- Enhancing Physical Activity - Evidence and Implications. London, UK: Health Education Autority; 1998.
• ⁹
  Jakes RW, Day NE, Khaw KT, Luben R, Oakes S, Welch A, et al. Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolk population-based study. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57 (9): 1089-96.
• ¹⁰
  Hu FB, Li TY, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Manson JE. Television watching and other sedentary behaviors in relation to risk of obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus in women. JAMA 2003;289(14):1785-91.
• ¹¹
  Banks E, Jorm L, Rogers K, Clements M, Bauman A. Screen-time, obesity, ageing and disability: findings from 91 266 participants in the 45 and Up Study. Public Health Nutr 2011;14(1):34-43.
• ¹²
  Chang PC, Li TC, Wu MT, Liu CS, Li CI, Chen CC, et al. Association between television viewing and the risk of metabolic syndrome in a community-based population. BMC Public Health 2008;8:193.
• ¹³
  Stamatakis E, Hamer M, Dunstan DW. Screen-based entertainment time, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular events: population-based study with ongoing mortality and hospital events follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57(3):292-9.
• ¹⁴
  Dunstan DW, Barr EL, Healy GN, Salmon J, Shaw JE, Balkau B, et al. Television viewing time and mortality: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab). Circulation 2010;121(3):384-91.
• ¹⁵
  Van der Ploeg HP, Chey T, Korda RJ, Banks E, Bauman A. Sitting time and all-cause mortality risk in 222 497 Australian adults. Arch Intern Med 2012;172(6):494-500.
• ¹⁶
  Garmy P, Clausson EK, Nyberg P, Jakobsson U. Overweight and television and computer habits in Swedish school-age children and adolescents: a cross-sectional study. Nurs Health Sci 2014;16(2):143-8.
• ¹⁷
  American Academy of Pediatrics. Children, adolescents, and television. Pediatrics 2001, 107:423–426.
• ¹⁸
  Saunders TJ, Chaput JP, Tremblay MS. Sedentary behaviour as an emerging risk factor for cardiometabolic diseases in children and youth. Can J Diabetes 2014;38(1):53-61.
• ¹⁹
  Edwardson CL, Gorely T, Davies MJ, Gray LJ, Khunti K, Wilmot EG, et al. Association of sedentary behaviour with metabolic syndrome: a meta-analysis. Plos One 2012; 7(4): e34916.
• ²⁰
  Pitanga FJG, Alves CFA, Pamponet, ML, Medina, MG, Aquino R. Tempo de tela como discriminador de excesso de peso, obesidade e obesidade abdominal em adolescentes. Rev Bras Cineantropom Desempenho Hum 2016; 18 (5): 539-547.
• ²¹
  Matsudo S, Araújo T, Matsudo V, Andrade D, Andrade E, Oliveira LC, Braggion G. Questionário internacional de atividade física (IPAQ): Estudo de validade e reprodutibilidade no Brasil. Rev Bras Ativ Fís Saúde 2001;6(2):5-18.
• ²²
  Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, Dietz WH. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000; 320 (7244): 1240-1243.
• ²³
  Slater B, Philippi ST, Fisberg RM, Latorre MR. Validation of a semi-quantitative adolescent food frequency questionnaire applied at a public school in São Paulo, Brazil. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003;57(5):629-35.
• ²⁴
  Erdreich LS, Lee ET. Use of relative operating characteristics analysis in epidemiology: a method for dealing with subjective judgment. Am J Epidemiol 1981; 114 (5): 649-62.
• ²⁵
  Janes H, Longton G, Pepe MS. Accommodating covariates in receiver operating characteristic analysis. Stata J 2009; 9 (1): 17-39.
• ²⁶
  Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskell W, Ekelund U; Lancet Physical Activity Series Working Group. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012; 380 (9838):247-57.
• ²⁷
  Bickham DS, Blood EA, Walls CE, Shrier LA, Rich M. Characteristics of Screen Media Use Associated With Higher BMI in Young Adolescents. Pediatrics 2013; 131(5): 935-41.
• ²⁸
  Ghavamzadeh S, Khalkhali HR, Alizadeh M. TV Viewing, Independent of Physical Activity and Obesogenic Foods, Increases Overweight and Obesity in Adolescents. J Health Popul Nutr 2013; 31(3): 334-42.
• ²⁹
  Kim Y, Barreira TV, Kang M. Concurrent Associations of Physical Activity and Screen-Based Sedentary Behavior on Obesity Among US Adolescents: A Latent Class Analysis. J Epidemiol 2016; 26(3):137-44.
• ³⁰
  Pearson N, Biddle SJ. Sedentary behavior and dietary intake in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2011; 41(2): 178-88.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  17 Oct 2019
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  22 July 2018
• Accepted
  06 May 2019