SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.64 issue1Evaluation of oral conditions in patients with neurodegenerative diseases treated in geriatric centersDescriptive study of apical periodontitis detected in Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • text new page (beta)
  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia

Print version ISSN 0103-6971On-line version ISSN 1981-8637

RGO, Rev. Gaúch. Odontol. vol.64 no.1 Campinas Jan./Mar. 2016

https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-863720160001000032923 

Original

Limitation of mouth opening after radiotherapy for head and neck

Limitação de abertura bucal pós-radioterapia de cabeça e pescoço

Rafael da Silva CAETANO1 

Paula Gabrielle de CASTRO2 

Paulo Henrique de Souza CASTRO2 

Alexandre Meireles BORBA1 

Álvaro Henrique BORGES1 

Luiz Evaristo Ricci VOLPATO1 

1Universidade de Cuiabá, Faculdade de Odontologia. Av. Beira Rio, 3048, 78025-190, Cuiabá, MT, Brasil. Correspondência para / Correspondence to: RS CAETANO. E-mail: <rafael_scaetano@hotmail.com>.

2Hospital de Câncer de Mato Grosso. Cuiabá, MT, Brasil.


ABSTRACT

Objective:

To evaluate the ability to open the mouth in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck and the variables related to this limitation.

Methods:

32 patients were evaluated six months after completion of radiotherapy sessions to treat cancer in the head and neck. The maximum mouth opening was measured using digital calipers and its association with gender, age, smoking, alcohol consumption, tumor location, chemotherapy and surgery were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests at a level of significance of 95%.

Results:

The mean age of patients was 60.44 years; 87.5% were male; 81.2% were smokers; 65.6% regularly consumed alcohol. The average mouth opening was 43.17 mm and seven (21.9%) patients had trismus. The most common locations of the tumors were the tongue (31.3%) followed by the larynx and vocal folds with five (15.6%) each. No association was found between limited mouth opening and the other variables.

Conclusion:

In this sample, 21.9% of patients had trismus six months after completing radiotherapy. The variables gender, age, smoking habits and alcohol consumption, tumor location, previous surgery and adjunctive chemotherapy were not associated with limited mouth opening.

Indexing terms: Head and neck neoplasms; Mouth; Radiotherapy.

RESUMO

Objetivo:

Avaliar a capacidade de abertura bucal de pacientes submetidos a tratamento radioterápico de cabeça e as variáveis relacionadas à sua limitação.

Métodos:

Foram analisados 32 pacientes seis meses após o término das sessões de radioterapia para tratamento de câncer em região de cabeça e pescoço. A medida da abertura bucal máxima foi aferida por meio de um paquímetro digital e sua associação com as variáveis sexo, idade, tabagismo, etilismo, localização do tumor, realização de quimioterapia e cirurgia foram analisadas com os testes U de Mann-Whitney e Kruskal-Wallis no nível de significância de 95%.

Resultados:

A idade média dos pacientes foi de 60,44 anos; 87,5% eram do sexo masculino; 81,2% eram tabagistas; 65,6% eram etilistas. A média de abertura bucal foi de 43,17mm e sete pacientes (21,9%) apresentavam trismo. As localizações mais frequentes dos tumores foi a língua (31,3%), seguida da laringe e da prega vocal com cinco (15,6%) cada uma. Não foi encontrada associação entre a limitação de abertura bucal e as variáveis estudadas.

Conclusão:

Na amostra estudada, 21,9% dos pacientes apresentaram trismo seis meses após o término do tratamento radioterápico. As variáveis sexo, hábitos de etilismo e tabagismo, localização do tumor, cirurgia prévia e quimioterapia adjuvante não estiveram associados à limitação de abertura bucal.

Termos de indexação: Neoplasias de cabeça e pescoço; Boca; Radioterapia.

INTRODUCTION

Amongst the malign neoplasms of the head and neck, tumors occurring in the oral cavity account for 40% of cases, followed by those of the larynx (25%) and pharynx (15%). The remaining neoplasms are located in the saliva and thyroid glands1.

Radiotherapy is a mode of treatment that is often used for malign neoplasms of the head and neck and has a significant cure rate, although it is associated with various oral complications2.

The chewing muscles or the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), when they are enclosed in a radiation field, may lead to the formation of tissue fibrosis, muscle spasms and restricted mouth opening, or trismus3.

Trismus manifests itself slowly and can evolve into an inability to open the mouth and prevent normal function4, harming an individual's quality of life as it hampers the proper digestion of food, chewing and oral hygiene. Trismus also makes dental treatment extremely difficult5-6.

Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate, in a subpopulation, the mouth-opening ability of patients subjected to radiotherapy treatment in the area of the head and neck.

METHODS

In order to carry out this study, a convenience sample was employed consisting of 32 patients subjected to radiotherapy treatment in the area of the head and neck, both with and without associated chemotherapy and surgery, between the months of January and June 2012. The patients were selected by undergoing a pre-radiotherapy oral examination in the Dental Department of the Mato Grosso Cancer Hospital (known locally as the DOHC), all of whom gave their consent by signing a Free and Informed Consent form.

The patient analyses were performed, by a single researcher, six months after the conclusion of the radiotherapy sessions. During the evaluation, data were collected in respect of age, the social habits of smoking and alcohol consumption, tumor location, performance of adjunctive treatment (chemotherapy and/or surgery) and the measurement of the mouth opening.

The mouth opening capacity was checked using digital calipers (Pantec - São Paulo, Brazil). In those patients who still have their teeth, the distance was measured between the incisal edge of the upper and lower incisors (11, 41); patients with an edentulous lower arch and without the use of a prosthesis, the distance between the incisal edge of tooth 11 and the lower alveolar ridge (region of tooth 41); patients with an edentulous upper arch and without the use of a prosthesis, the distance between the incisal edge of tooth 41 and the alveolar ridge (region of tooth 11); edentulous patients using prostheses, the distance between the upper and lower dentures was measured, or if the patient had no prosthesis, the maximum distance between the two alveolar ridges (location of teeth 11 and 41) was measured, as described by Dijkstra et al.7 A patient was deemed to be suffering from trismus when his/her maximum mouth opening was less than 35 mm7.

The data were stored using Microsoft Excel and the subsequent statistical analysis was conducted using the IBM SPSS 20.0 software application. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze two independent samples. For the analysis of more than two samples, the Kruskal-Wallis test was applied. The level of significance employed was 95%.

The research project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Cuiabá (UNIC), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil, opinion no. 378.314.

RESULTS

The mean age of the volunteers was 60.44 years (±10.84), the minimum age being 43 and maximum 82 years. Of the volunteers, 28 (87.5%) were male, 26 (81.3%) were smokers and 21 (65.6%) were regular consumers of alcohol. Seven (21.9%) of the 32 patients analyzed presented with trismus (Table 1).

Table 1 Distribution of patients evaluated according to the variables of sex, alcohol and smoking habits and the presence of trismus. Cuiabá (MT), 2014. 

Variables n (%)
Sex
Female 4 (12.5)
Male 28 (87.5)
Variables n (%)
Alcohol Consumption
Yes 21 (65.6)
No 11 (34.4)
Smoking
Yes 26 (81.2)
No 6 (18.8)
Trismus
Yes 7 (21.9)
No 25 (78.1)

With regard to the location of the tumor, the region most affected was the tongue, with 10 cases (31.3%), followed by the larynx and the vocal fold, each with 5 (15.6%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of patients according to tumor location. Cuiabá (MT), 2014. 

Tumor location n (%)
Floor of mouth 1 (3.1)
Pharynx 2 (6.3)
Larynx 5 (15.6)
Tongue 10 (31.3)
Ear 2 (6.3)
Palate 2 (6.3)
Tonsillar pillar 1 (3.1)
Vocal fold 5 (15.6)
Gingival margin 1 (3.1)
Thyroid 1 (3.1)
Not identified 2 (6.3)
Total 32 (100)

The average mouth opening of the patients was 43.17 mm (±12.17). In a comparison of the mouth opening of the patients by sex, alcohol and smoking habits, tumor location and adjunctive treatment with surgery or chemotherapy, no statistical difference was found between the groups (Table 3).

Table 3 Analysis of the mouth opening of patients by sex, alcohol and smoking habits and tumor location. Cuiabá (MT), 2014. 

Variable Mouth opening (mm) P
Average Standard deviation
Sex 0.120
Male 44.09 12.45
Female 36.75 8.54
Alcohol Consumption 0.907
Yes 43.43 12.44
No 42.68 12.23
Smoking
Yes 42.30 13.01 0.285
No 46.94 7.18
Tumor location
Floor of mouth 46.00 -
Pharynx 20.00 18.38
Larynx 46.30 10.34
Tongue 42.00 12.83
Ear 52.75 2.47 0.381
Palate 39.25 2.47
Tonsillar pillar 46.00 -
Vocal fold 49.38 11.77
Gingival margin 34.00 -
Thyroid 52.15 -
Not identified 40.50 6.36
Chemotherapy
Yes 40.95 12.49 0.063
No 49.79 10.55
Surgery
Yes 41.28 13.13 0.373
No 46.75 10.66

NB. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the variables of sex, alcohol consumption and smoking. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used for the location of the tumor.

DISCUSSION

As found in other studies, the mean age of the sample was over 60 years5,8-10, the dominant sex is male and the location most affected by tumors is the tongue5,7-8.

With regard to social habits, around 81.3% of patients declared themselves to be smokers while 65.6% were regular alcohol drinkers. The study conducted by Bragante et al.9 obtained a sample of 26 volunteers in which 100% were smokers and 73.1% stated they were regular alcohol drinkers, with results close to those obtained in this study.

The average mouth opening of the patients analyzed was 43.17 mm (±12.17), close to that observed by Jager-Wittenaar et al.5, in a study that analyzed the mouth opening of 120 patients (40.1 mm ±11.5), and far higher than that found by Scott et al.10, in a study which analyzed the mouth opening of 100 patients, observing an average mouth opening of 32 mm.

Seven (21.9%) of the thirty-two participants in this study presented with trismus. This percentage is considered high, more than one fifth of the patients, although it is less than that found by Lee et al.11, where 79% of patients had trismus six months after the conclusion of radiotherapy, and by Pauli et al.12, where 38% of the 75 patients presented with trismus.

In the study by Lee et al.11 it was noted that patients who were regular consumers of alcohol have a lower chance of the occurrence of restricted mouth opening, possibly due to the intoxication which could reduce the sensation of pain during movement of the jaw, leading to a wider opening of the mouth than amongst those who do not use alcohol. In the present study, there was no statistical difference between mouth opening patients who were drinkers compared with those who did not drink.

In this study, the adjunctive treatments, such as chemotherapy and surgery, had no influence on the mouth opening of the volunteers, just as with the study by Lindblom et al.13 which showed no connection between surgery and mouth opening limitations. With regard to chemotherapy, Bragante et al.9 noted no variation in mouth opening measurements.

Despite the fact that this study did not find any statistical differences in patients with and without trismus, it is important to stress that more than one fifth of patients who underwent radiotherapy in the region of the head and neck still presented with limited mouth opening six months after the conclusion of treatment, similar to the study by Jager-Wittenaar et al.5 who found no significant difference in the maximum mouth opening in patients with or without trismus.

Santos et al.14 underline the importance of the dental surgeon in minimizing or even avoiding these alterations, thereby providing the individual with a better quality of life, given that not only trismus but also other reactions caused by radiotherapy may be prejudicial to the patient.

Epstein et al.15 stress that active/passive exercises should be commenced after surgery and radiotherapy in the region of the head and neck, when the muscles responsible for the movement of the lower jaw lie within the radiation field, as once a limitation on mouth opening is established, mobility is impaired. According to Ren et al.16, the TheraBite(r), a tool used for mouth opening exercises, may be employed, or even other simple devices such as tongue depressors and corkscrews that are used in clinical practice to help with mouth opening.

CONCLUSION

In the sample studied, 21.9% of patients presented with a maximum mouth opening of less than 35 mm six months after the conclusion of radiotherapy treatment. The variables of sex, drinking and smoking habits, tumor location, previous surgery and adjunctive chemotherapy were not associated with mouth opening limitations.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Mato Grosso State Research Foundation (FAPEMAT) for the financial assistance given to the project under Process no. 156662/2014.

REFERENCES

1. Dobrossy L. Epidemiology of head and neck cancer: magnitude of the problem. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2005;24(1):9-17. [ Links ]

2. Tolentino ES, Centurion BS, Ferreira LHC, Souza AP, Damante JH, Rubira-Bullen IRF. Oral adverse effects of head and neck radiotherapy: literature review and suggestion of a clinical oral care guideline for irradiated patients. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011;19(5):448-54. doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572011000500003 [ Links ]

3. Goldstein M, Maxymiw WG, Cummings BJ, Wood RE. The effects of antitumor irradiation on mandibular opening and mobility: a prospective study of 58 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88(3):365-73. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70044-2 [ Links ]

4. Sciubba JJ, Goldenberg D. Oral complications of radiotherapy. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(2):175-83. [ Links ]

5. Jager-Wittenaar H, Dijkstra PU, Vissink A, van Oort RP, Roodenburg JL. Variation in repeated mouth-opening measurements in head and neck cancer patients with and without trismus. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(1):26-30. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2008.10.001 [ Links ]

6. Flores JA, Machado E, Machado P, Flores FW, Mezomo MB. Avaliação da presença de trismo em pacientes submetidos à exodontias de terceiros molares. RGO, Rev Gaúch Odontol. 2007;55(1):17-22. [ Links ]

7. Dijkstra PU, Huisman PM, Roodenburg JL. Criteria for trismus in head and neck oncology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;35(4):337-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2005.08.001. [ Links ]

8. Wetzels JW, Merkx MA, de Haan AF, Koole R, Speksnijder CM. Maximum mouth opening and trismus in 143 patients treated for oral cancer: A 1-year prospective study. Head Neck. 2014;36(12):1754-62. doi: 10.1002/hed.23534 [ Links ]

9. Bragante KC, Nascimento DM, Motta NW. Avaliação dos efeitos agudos da radioterapia sobre os movimentos mandibulares de pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2012;16(2):141-7. [ Links ]

10. Scott B, Butterworth C, Lowe D, Rogers SN. Factors associated with restricted mouth opening and its relationship to health-related quality of life in patients attending a maxillofacial oncology clinic. Oral Oncol. 2008;44(5):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2007.06.015 [ Links ]

11. Lee R, Slevin N, Musgrove B, Swindell R, Molassiotis A. Prediction of post-treatment trismus in head and neck cancer patients. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50(4):328-32. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2011.06.009 [ Links ]

12. Pauli N, Johnson J, Finizia C, Andréll P. The incidence of trismus and long-term impact on health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(6):1137-45. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.744466 [ Links ]

13. Lindblom U, Gärskog O, Kjellén E, Laurell G, Levring Jäghagen E, Wahlberg P, et al. Radiation-induced trismus in the ARTSCAN head and neck trial. Acta Oncol. 2014;53(5):620-7. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.892209 [ Links ]

14. Santos MG, Silva LCF, Lins CA, Passos DD, Oliveira Neto JN, Santos TS. Fatores de risco em radioterapia de cabeça e pescoço. RGO, Rev Gaucha Odontol. 2010;58(2):191-6. [ Links ]

15. Epstein JB, Thariat J, Bensadoun R, Barasch A, Murphy BA, Kolnick L, et al. Oral complications of cancer and cancer therapy: from cancer treatment to survivorship. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(6):400-22. doi: 10.3322/caac.21157 [ Links ]

16. Ren WG, Ao HW, Lin Q, Xu ZG, Zhang B. Efficacy of mouth opening exercises in treating trismus after maxillectomy. Chin Med J (Engl). 2013;126(14):2666-9. [ Links ]

Received: November 19, 2014; Revised: September 23, 2015; Accepted: November 18, 2015

Collaborators RS CAETANO took part in the collection of research data, the bibliographical survey and composition of the manuscript. PG CASTRO took part in the patient selection, collection of research data, the bibliographical survey and the composition of the manuscript. PHS CASTRO coordinated and participated in the performance of the study, the bibliographical survey, critical intelligence review of the manuscript and composition of the article. AM BORBA participated in the data analysis and interpretation, critical intelligence review of the manuscript and composition of the article. AH Borges took part in the study's conception and operational planning, critical intelligence review of the manuscript and the composition of the article. LER VOLPATO took part in the study's conception, planning and data interpretation as well as the composition of the article.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License