With the advance of agriculture and cattle-raising into natural areas, humans and their domestic animals have recently been coming into greater contact with populations of wild animals in their habitats. This closer contact facilitates the spread of infectious agents and parasites to new hosts and environments, thereby establishing new relationships between hosts and parasites, and new ecological niches in the disease transmission chain (^{CORRÊA; PASSOS, 2001}).

Infection routes are directly related to causal agents, which means that knowledge of the disease transmission chain may provide an opportunity to ascertain how these agents reach new susceptible hosts. Thus, in relation to epidemiological factors, wild animals may have an extremely important role in the transmission of zoonoses, both in captivity and in the wild (^{MARVULO, 2007}).

The emergence of infectious diseases with zoonotic potential has dominated research on wildlife pathogens over recent years (^{McCALLUM; DOBSON, 1995}; ^{HOLMES, 1996};^{DASZAK et al., 2000}; ^{RHYAN; SPRAKER, 2010}). As a result, not only have studies on the biodiversity and ecology of parasites been neglected, but also efforts to control them have been impaired. The research focus has been directed toward humans and domestic animals. However, there is also a need to obtain greater understanding of how these emerging pathogens interact with sets of organisms living together in wild ecosystems (^{THOMPSON et al., 2010}).

The objective of this study was to investigate the frequency of occurrence and variety of intestinal parasites among free-living wild animals in two wild animal rehabilitation centers in the states of São Paulo and Mato Grosso do Sul.

Between January 2007 and May 2008, fecal samples were collected from mammals and birds that had been newly introduced (less than five days earlier) to wild animal rehabilitation centers in Jundiai, SP, and Campo Grande, MS. The samples were collected in the mornings using sterile collecting tubes, preserved in 5% potassium dichromate, stored under refrigeration (4°C) and sent to the Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases Laboratory of the State University of Northern Paraná, Luis Meneghel Campus, in Bandeirantes, PR, not more than one week after collection. The numbers and species of the animals that participated in this study are specified in Table 1. A total of 38 samples belonging to major groups were analyzed: five primates samples, thirteen felid samples, five canid samples, two marsupial samples, one deer samples adn twelve samples (mostly in a pool) from several birds.

Prior to coproparasitological analyses, fecal samples from the carnivores were subjected to the centrifugal-sedimentation technique in water-ether. Subsequently, the feces were examined by means of simple sedimentation and centrifugal-flotation methods in sucrose solution (d = 1.203 g/cm³), as described by ^{Ferreira et al. (1962)}.

In the present study, several biological forms of gastroenteric parasites were found in 71% of the 38 samples analyzed (Table 1). All 15 samples of mammals and birds from São Paulo (100%) and 52% of the samples from Mato Grosso do Sul were positive for one or more parasite. Although the original locations of the animals evaluated in this study were unknown, the greater occurrence of parasites in the wild animals at the rehabilitation center in São Paulo (chi-square = 7.91; p = 0.005) may have been due to the smaller environmental conservation area in relation to Mato Grosso do Sul. There was consequently a greater possibility of contact between wild animals, humans and domestic animals in São Paulo. The animals brought into these centers were mostly animals that had been run over or, in the case of cougars, cubs that had been caught by the competent environmental agencies (such as the Environmental Police). The birds originated from wild animal trafficking and domesticated pets that had been abandoned by their previous owners.

Parasites were found in 85% (11/13) of the felid fecal samples:Ancylostoma sp. and Toxocara cati eggs were found in 46%, Cryptosporidium sp. and Cystoisospora sp. oocysts in 15% and Giardia cysts and Toxascaris leonina eggs in 8% of these animals.

Giardia and Cryptosporidium are the most prevalent intestinal parasites in humans and domestic animals, and are increasingly recognized as common parasites of several wild animals (^{FAYER, 2004}; ^{THOMPSON, 2004}; ^{THOMPSON; MONIS, 2004}; ^{APPELBEE et al., 2005}).

Giardia has been reported in several wild mammal species. However, little information is available about the species and genotypes that occur naturally in these mammals (^{APPELBEE et al., 2005}; ^{KUTZ et al., 2009}; ^{THOMPSON et al., 2009}). In most cases, when appropriate tools for characterizing this parasite were applied, the Giardia genotype found in free-living terrestrial and aquatic mammals was usually of human origin, i.e. ofGiardia duodenalis genotype (^{THOMPSON et al., 2009}). Giardia cysts found in one of the cougars (Puma concolor) in the present study were genotyped and were also of human origin (^{SOARES et al., 2011}). In all these cases, epidemiological evidence suggests that human beings are the source of infection, through direct or indirect environmental contamination from raising domestic animals. The impact of these zoonotic species of Giardia in the wild is unknown. The evidence for an association of Giardia infection with clinical disease in primates is sparse (^{GRACZYK et al., 2002}).

The reemergence of infection by Cryptosporidium in humans, particularly in immune-deficient patients, has stimulated research, monitoring and characterization of this parasite in wild species in order to identify possible reservoirs for water-borne infection of human beings (^{THOMPSON et al., 2005}). Several varieties ofCryptosporidium have been identified, but with little or no significance for public health (^{CACCIO et al., 2005}; ^{HUNTER; THOMPSON, 2005}; ^{SLAPETA, 2009}). The diversity ofCryptosporidium spp. found in wildlife deserves further study in terms of ecology, evolution, biology and potential impact on the health of these animals (^{THOMPSON et al., 2010}).

Ancylostoma tubaeforme is a cosmopolitan nematode in cats (^{ANDERSON, 2000}) and, in Neotropical regions, it has been reported in jaguarundi (Herpailurus yagouaroundi), jaguars (Panthera onca) and Geoffroy's cats (Oncifelis geoffroyi) (^{THATCHER, 1971}; ^{MARTINÉZ, 1987}). ^{Beldomenico et al. (2006)} identified helminth eggs in seven wild felids in Argentina and found several species, including Ancylostoma tubaeforme,Toxocara cati and Taenia sp.

Infection of these animal species may indicate that there could be proximity to and interactions with domestic cats. However, unfortunately, information about the helminthic fauna in Neotropical felids is rare and scarce (^{BELDOMENICO, 2006}).

Regarding the canid samples analyzed, 20% of the animals presentedGiardia cysts, Eimeria sp. oocysts andToxocara canis eggs. In the samples of a Cerdocyon thous (crab-eating fox) and Chrysocyon brachyurus (maned wolf) were identified Cestoda eggs and Eimeria oocysts. In a study carried in wild canids of Serra do Cipó National Park, Brazil, revealed the presence of Ancylostomiae, Trichuridae eggs among others parasites in feces of Cerdocyon thous and Chrysocyon brachyuru, however, only one sample (20%) of Cerdocyon thous was found Cestoda eggs (^{SANTOS et al., 2012}).

In the feces of a gray brocket (Mazama gouazoubira), only two Giardia sp. cysts were identified. Since this was the only animal of this species in the reserves, studies on possible parasites that could be found in this species were compromised. Several studies have been published about deer parasites in New Jersey (^{SAMUEL et al., 1968}), southern Chile (^{DIAZ et al., 1977}), Hawaii (^{McKENZIE et al., 1989}) and Brazil (^{NASCIMENTO, 1996}, ²⁰⁰⁰). However, there are few reports on protozoa in deer. In southern Chile, presence of Moniezia and Sarcocystis has been reported (^{DIAZ et al., 1977}).

In the feces samples from coatis (Nasua nasua), trophozoites containing several unidentified flagella were found.

Eggs from Enterobius sp. (Oxyuridae) were identified in the fecal sample from a red howler monkey (Alouatta seniculus). This is one of the few reports of this parasite in this species of non-human primate. In a scientific excursion to the Pantanal area of the state of Mato Grosso (the banks of the rivers São Lourenço and Cuiabá) many decades ago, researchers performed necropsies on 455 birds, 62 mammals, 63 fish, 25 reptiles and two amphibians. Among these, 43% were parasitized: 33% by nematodes, 27% by trematodes, 18% by cestodes, 7% by acanthocephalans and 3% by pentastomids. In this excursion, the first report of the genus Enterobius (Enterobius minutus species) was made in a howler monkey (Alouatta caraya) (^{TRAVASSOS et al., 1927}).

Enterobius nematodes are Oxyuridae that are found in humans and primates and have anthropozoonotic importance (DILRUKSDHI et al., 2006). Species ofStrongyloides and Enterobius in non-human primates, including the human parasites Enterobius vermicularis,Strongyloides stercoralis and S. fuelleborni have been described by ^{Inglis (1961)}, ^{Yamaschita (1963)}, ^{Collet et al. (1986)} and ^{Monteiro et al. (2003)}.

Another study published with similar findings was conducted in 2001, on 125 monkeys of the species Macaca sinica sinica, Trachypithecus vetulus philbricki and Semnopithecus priam thersites in the Polonnaruwa Nature Sanctuary and Archaeological Reserve in Sri Lanka. The samples were analyzed by means of the fecal flotation test and the researchers identified the genus Enterobius in 52% of the monkeys studied, among other parasites (^{EKANAYABE et al., 2006}).

In relation to the birds, a pool of feces was collected from the cages and examined. Several Cryptosporidium sp. oocysts in scaly-headed parrots (Pionus maximiliani), Eimeria sp. oocysts andStrongyloides sp. embryonated eggs in blue-and-yellow (Ara ararauna) and red-and-green macaws (Ara chloroptera) were identified.

Studies conducted on these birds in the state of Pernambuco showed the presence of Ascaridia sp., Strongyloides sp.,Heterakis spp., Strongyloidea and Spiruroidea; Trematoda and Cestoda eggs; Balantidium coli, Entamoeba coli andE. histolytica cysts; and coccidian oocysts. Among these, higher occurrence of Capillaria sp., Strongyloidea,Strongyloides sp. and Ascaridia sp. was found, with prevalences of 76.5, 13.7, 5.9 and 2% respectively (^{FREITAS et al., 2002}).

Despite the small number of samples collected, it could be concluded that the diversity of parasites found in fecal samples from the animals evaluated was noteworthy, considering the lack of information on occurrence and diversity of the vast majority of parasites in free-living wild animals under Brazilian conditions.

Studies on endoparasite fauna in wild animals and consequent detection of infection in these animals might suggest that there could be proximity to and interactions with domestic animals and/or humans. Therefore, further studies on parasites in wild animals are necessary in order to better understand the intensity of anthropic changes to wild environments.