Introduction
The parasitic protozoans of the genus Caryosporabelong to the Phylum Apicomplexa. The members of this genus colonize the digestive tracts of reptiles and birds. The genus is characterized by oocysts with a single, octozoic sporocyst, and the species with known life cycles are facultatively or obligatorily heteroxenous with merogony and gamogony in both primary (predator) and secondary (prey) hosts (UPTON et al., 1986).
The coccidian Caryospora bigenetica was first described in the snake Crotalus horridus in Iowa, USA, by Wacha & Christiansen (1982). Subsequently, it has been reported infecting Sistrurus catenatus, Sistrurus miliaris, Agkistrodon contortrix, Crotalus adamanteus and Crotalus atrox, all species belonging to the subfamily Crotalinae of the family Viperidae (DUSZYNSKI & UPTON, 2009). Moreover, experimental infections have been investigated in many species of mammals, including Canis familiaris, Sus scrofa, Mus musculus and Capra hircus. Previously, the geographical distribution of C. bigenetica included only the states of Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, New Jersey and Texas, USA (DUSZYNSKI & UPTON, 2009).
The only coccidian species previously described in Brazilian snakes of the family Viperidae is Caryospora jararacae, found in Bothrops jararaca and Bothrops atrox (CARINI, 1939; LAINSON et al., 1991). However, 36 species of the family Viperidae are found in Brazil. These species belong to the genera Bothrops (n = 27), Crotalus (n = 6), Bothrocophias (n = 2) and Lachesis (n = 1) (BÉRNILS & COSTA, 2012). As part of a study of coccidian diversity in Brazilian snakes, this study represents the first report of a natural C. bigenetica infection in South American viperid snakes.
Materials and Methods
Snake feces were sampled between November 2013 and May 2014. Snakes were obtained from various localities in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Brazil, via donations from local residents and environmental agencies such as the Center for Rehabilitation of Wild Animals (CRAS), Environmental Military Police and Fire Brigade. The animals were transported to the bioterium of Dom Bosco Catholic University (UCDB) in the county of Campo Grande. Snakes sampled at the Vital Brazil Institute in the state of Rio de Janeiro (RJ) were from various parts of the state and were obtained, as in the case of the UCDB specimens, via donations from local residents and environmental agencies. Two snakes were obtained from states other than MS and RJ. A B. atrox specimen was obtained from the county of Porto Velho, state of Rondonia, and Bothrops insularis specimen was obtained from the Island of Queimada Grande, between Itanhaém and Peruíbe counties in the state of São Paulo. Specimens were kept separated in polyethylene boxes (39 cm x 59 cm x 31 cm) with covers and with holes in the sides. All boxes had a corrugated substrate. In each box, water was provided in an aluminum container with an iron base. Live mice (M. musculus) were supplied as food. The UCDB biotherium is accredited by the Brazilian Institute of Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (IBAMA), registration number 170855.
The feces were placed in plastic vials containing a 2.5% (w/v) (i.e., a 1:6 v/v ratio) K2Cr2O7 solution and processed at the Laboratory of Veterinary Parasitology, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS). The fecal material was placed on a thin layer (~ 5 mm) of 2.5% (w/v) K2Cr2O7 solution in Petri dishes and incubated at 23–28°C for two weeks. Oocysts were recovered by flotation in Sheather's sugar solution (S.G. 1.20) and microscopically examined (DUSZYNSKI & WILBER, 1997). Morphological observations and measurements (μm) were performed using a Carl Zeiss binocular microscope with an apochromatic oil immersion objective lens and ocular micrometer. Oocysts were photographed with a Zeiss universal photomicroscope equipped with Nomarski interference 100 × objective lenses. The size ranges are shown in parentheses, followed by the average and shape index (L/W ratio). All measurements are given in micrometres (µm). At least five measurements of each infected snake were recorded.
Photomicrographs of sporulated oocysts are deposited and available in the Parasitology Collection of the Laboratório de Coccídios e Coccidioses (http://r1.ufrrj.br/lcc), at UFRRJ, located in Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Photographs of the host specimens are deposited in the same collection. The repository number is P-57/2014.
Results
We performed coprological examinations of 214 snakes from MS belonging to 10 species (Table 1) and 42 snakes belonging to 8 species maintained in the Vital Brazil Institute, RJ (Table 2). Oocysts ofC. bigenetica were found in 6% (12/214) of the specimens from MS, i.e., 10 Bothrops moojeni and two Crotalus durissus, and in 5% (2/40) of the specimens from RJ, i.e., one C. durissus and one Bothrops jararacussu.
Table 1 Snakes examined for presence of coccidians from state of Mato Grosso do Sul.
Species | Total | Positive | % |
---|---|---|---|
Bothrops moojeni | 83 | 10 | 12 |
Crotalus durissus | 59 | 2 | 3 |
Bothrops alternatus | 34 | 0 | 0 |
Bothrops matogrossenssis | 19 | 0 | 0 |
Sibynomorphus mikanii | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Oxyrhopus trigeminus | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Boa constrictor | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Erythrolamprus poecilogyrus | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Philodryas olfersii | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Xenodon merremii | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Total general | 214 | 12 | 5.6 |
Table 2 Snakes examined for presence of coccidians from Instituto Vital Brazil, state of Rio de Janeiro.
Species | Total | Positive | % |
---|---|---|---|
Bothrops jararacussu | 23 | 1 | 4 |
Bothrops atrox | 9 | 0 | 0 |
Bothrops jararaca | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Bothrops insularis | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Bothrops neuwiedi | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Boa constrictor | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bothrops moojeni | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Crotalus durissus | 1 | 1 | 100 |
Total general | 42 | 2 | 5 |
The oocysts were spheroidal with a double wall, ≈1.0, the exterior lightly mammillated, striations apparent in transverse view (Figures 1 and 2), L × W (N = 70): 13.0 (12 – 14); L/W ratio 1.0; micropyle and oocyst residuum absent and polar granule fixed in the internal wall. Ovoid or pyriform sporocysts, L × W (N = 70): 10.0 × 8.0 (9 – 11 × 8 – 9); L/W ratio 1.3; Stieda body discoid; sub-Stieda body present; paraStieda body absent; sporocyst residuum present, formed by a group of spheroid bodies between sporozoites (Figure 3).

Figures 1-3 Nomarski interference-contrast photomicrographs of the sporulated oocyst of Caryospora bigenetica from Crotalus durissus. Figure 1. Oocyst showing striations (ow) in transverse view. Figure 2. Textured outer wall of oocyst (ow) and polar granule (pg). Figure 3. Sporocyst showing residuum (sr), Stieda body (sb) discoid and sub-Stieda body (ssb), and sporozoite extremity (sz). Bar = 10 µm for all figures.
Discussion
Although 381 species of snakes occur in Brazil (BÉRNILS & COSTA, 2012), there is only 12 records for coccidians (3%) (DUSZYNSKI & UPTON, 2009). This diversity is probably due to low amount of snake sampling and not the mere absence of coccidian infection. The last two records of new species of coccidians of snakes in Brazil have an interval of 22 years between them. They recorded six new species of Caryospora in the northern region of the country (Lainson et al., 1991) and Caryospora olfersii in Philodryas olfersii in the southeastern region (VIANA et al., 2013).
In this study the oocysts found in C. durissus, B. moojeni and Bothrops jararacussu were morphologically and morphometrically identical to the original description of C. bigenetica in C. horridus (WACHA & CHRISTIANSEN, 1982). It is noteworthy, that in a previous study with snakes from Vital Brazil Institute was recorded prevalence of 75% of Caryospora sp. in C. durissus, B. mooojeni, and B. jararacussu (SOUZA et al., 2014).
Among snakes examinated in this study only three have formal descriptions for Caryospora species. Carini (1939) described Caryospora jararacae in B. jararaca and later also recorded in B. atrox (LAINSON et al., 1991), both of Viperidae. In P. olfersii (Colubridae) there are records of two caryosporans species, C. brasiliensis Carini, 1932 and C. olfersii Viana et al., 2013. These last species can be differentiated from C. bigenetica by size of oocysts, 33.1 × 31.2 µm for C. olfersii and 21.7 × 20.8 µm for C. brasiliensis, and both the polar granule is absent. Caryospora jararacae is distinguished by oocyst formed by one entirely smooth wall, unlike of C. bigenetica with dual wall lightly mammillated, and striations apparent in transverse view. Another closely related species is C. simplex, but this presents oocysts with one single wall. Additionally, C. simplex has only been recorded in the subfamily Viperinae, specifically in genus Daboai and Vipera, and restricted geographic distribution to Europe. While C. bigenetica appears restricted to the species of subfamily Crotalinae and the American continent (DUSZYNSKI & UPTON, 2009).
The prevalence of C. bigenetica in MS was four times greater in B. moojeni than in C. durissus. Note that the snakes originated from several locations in MS and that different numbers of animals were sampled for each species. However, it is probable that the observed difference was associated with the type of habitat used by both species of snakes. Bothrops moojeni inhabits shaded places, such as gallery forests and wetlands (NOGUEIRA et al., 2003). C. durissus is found in open, dry vegetation as that of the Brazilian Cerrado (COLLI et al., 2002), Caatinga and Chaco biomes (CAMPBELL & LAMAR, 2004). Most likely, the viability/availability of oocysts is less in dry and sunny environments such as those found in midwestern Brazil. Observations consistent with this suggestion have been recorded from natural populations of lizards (MCALLISTER et al., 1994) and rodents of the family Heteromyidae infected by coccidia (FORD et al., 1990). Experimental studies have shown that high levels of relative humidity and ambient temperature have a negative effect on the survival of coccidia (MARQUARDT et al., 1960; LANGKJAER & ROEPSTORFF, 2008).
Experimental infections with Caryospora spp. have shown that rodents are potential secondary hosts in natural cycles involving colubrids (MODRÝ et al., 2005) and viperid snakes (UPTON & BARNARD, 1988, KOUDELA et al., 2000). However, other food items, such as frogs and lizards, may be associated with the transmission of C. bigenetica under natural conditions. In a study of ontogenetic variation in the diet of B. moojeni, young individuals consumed relatively more frogs and lizards (76%) than mammals and birds (20%) (NOGUEIRA et al., 2003). In contrast, adult females showed a reversal of this pattern. Interestingly, two B. moojeni found to be infected by the current study have been observed preying on amphibians at a lagoon (K. MECCHI, personal obs.). Experimental infection studies are needed to clarify the involvement of these vertebrates in transmission cycles.
This study increases the number of viperid hosts of C. bigenetica and expands the geographic distribution of this protozoan to South America. The diversity of viperids in Brazil suggests that other Brazilian snake species can be infected by C. bigenetica.