SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.25 issue2Seroepidemiology of Sarcocystis neurona, Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora spp. among horses in the south of the state of Minas Gerais, BrazilLymphocytic meningoencephalomyelitis associated with Myxobolus sp. (Bivalvulidae: Myxozoa) infection in the Amazonian fish Eigenmannia sp. (Sternopygidae: Gymnotiformes) author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária

Print version ISSN 0103-846XOn-line version ISSN 1984-2961

Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. vol.25 no.2 Jaboticabal Apr./June 2016  Epub June 14, 2016

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612016022 

Original Article

Communities of parasite metazoans in Piaractus brachypomus (Pisces, Serrasalmidae) in the lower Amazon River (Brazil)

Comunidades de parasitos metazoários em Piaractus brachypomus (Pisces, Serrasalmidae) no baixo Rio Amazonas, Brasil

Marcos Sidney Brito Oliveira1 

Marcos Tavares-Dias2  * 

1Programa de Pós-graduação em Recursos Aquáticos Continentais Amazônicos – PPG-RACAM, Universidade do Oeste Paraense – UFOPA, Santarém, PA, Brasil

2Laboratório de Sanidade de Organismos Aquáticos, Embrapa Amapá, Macapá, AP, Brasil


Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the component community of parasite metazoans of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, northern Brazil. From 34 necropsied fish, 27,384 metazoan parasites were collected, such as Anacanthorus spathulatus, Mymarothecium viatorum and Notozothecium janauachensis (Monogenoidea); Spectatus spectatus and Contracaecum sp (Nematoda); Clinostomum marginatum and Dadaytrema oxycephala (Digenea); and Argulus carteri and Ergasilus sp. (Crustacea). The dominant species was S. spectatus followed by monogenoidean species, and there was aggregated dispersion of parasites, except for D. oxycephala and Contracaecum sp., which presented random dispersion. Positive correlation among the abundance of the three monogenoideans species were found, thus indicating that there was no competition between the species of these parasites on the gills of hosts. The abundances of some parasite species showed positive correlations with the size of the hosts, but the condition factor of the fish was not affected by the parasitism levels. It showed that this host had a metazoan community characterized by high species richness of metazoans, low evenness and high diversity of parasites, with prevalence of endoparasites, including larval stages. This was the first record of C. marginatum, A. carteri, Ergasilus sp. and Contracaecum sp. for P. brachypomus.

Keywords:  Amazon; diversity; endoparasites; helminths; freshwater fish

Resumo

O objetivo deste estudo foi investigar a comunidade componente de parasitos metazoários em Piaractus brachypomus no baixo Rio Amazonas, Norte do Brasil. Em 34 peixes necropsiados, 27.384 parasitos foram colhidos, tais como Anacanthorus spathulatus, Mymarothecium viatorum, Notozothecium janauachensis (Monogenoidea), Spectatus spectatus, larvas de Contracaecum sp. (Nematoda), Clinostomum marginatum, Dadaytrema oxycephala (Digenea), Argulus carteri e Ergasilus sp. (Crustacea). A dominância foi de S. spectatus, seguida por espécies de monogenoideas, e houve dispersão agregada dos parasitos, exceto D. oxycephala e Contracaecum sp., que apresentaram uma dispersão randômica. Foi encontrada correlação positiva entre a abundância das três espécies de monogenoideas, indicando que não houve uma competição entre as espécies desses parasitos nas brânquias. A abundância de algumas espécies de parasitos mostrou correlação positiva com o tamanho dos hospedeiros, e o fator de condição não foi afetado pelos níveis de parasitismo dos peixes. Mostrou-se que esse hospedeiro teve comunidade de metazoários, caracterizada por elevada riqueza de espécies, baixa uniformidade e elevada diversidade de parasitos com predominância de endoparasitos, inclusive em estágios larvais. Esse é o primeiro relato de C. marginatum, A. carteri, Ergasilus sp., e Contracaecum sp. para P. brachypomus

Palavras-chave:  Amazônia; diversidade; endoparasitos; helmintos; peixe de água doce

Introduction

The lower Amazon River region is covered by a wide variety of both terrestrial and aquatic vegetation, such herbaceous plants, shrubs and trees. Remarkable seasonal variations in the spatial and temporal distribution of flooding over these vegetation types are observed, caused by large annual variations in water levels (the “flood pulse”). Flood magnitude and periodicity are the main drivers of productivity, biodiversity and biogeochemistry in the Amazon basin (ARNESEN et al., 2013). In this region, the climate is typical of tropical rainforest, with maximum rainfall rates of December to May, and minimum of June to November. For this reason, the periods of drainage and flood promotes transitions in the wetland system among vegetation, land and water, thereby creating a very dynamic ecosystem. Although there is great diversity of fish species in this region, there are few studies on the parasitic fauna of these fish.

Piaractus brachypomus Cuvier, 1818 is an important Amazonian Serrasalmidae that is known as pirapitinga in Brazil. This fish has wide distribution in the Orinoco and Amazon River system, including the Madeira, Tocantins and Araguaia rivers in Brazil (MÉRONA, 1987; ISAAC et al., 1996; MÉRONA et al., 2010; FERREIRA et al., 2011; QUEIROZ et al., 2013). Through intercontinental translocation, this Amazonian fish can now also be found in Poland (BOEGER et al., 2002) and Croatia (ĆALETA et al., 2011), probably released into the environment by aquarists. This large-sized pelagic fish can reach up to 80 cm in length and has an omnivorous diet, feeding mostly on fruits, seeds and, occasionally, insects and macroinvertebrates (FERREIRA et al., 1998; SANTOS et al., 2006; SOARES et al., 2011; QUEIROZ et al., 2013). Piaractus brachypomus is a migratory fish that forms schools during its reproductive period, have external fertilization and total spawning, which occurs during the period of the Amazon floods (SOARES et al., 2011; SANTOS et al., 2006).

Brazilian fish farms produced 9858.7 tons of P. brachypomus in 2011 (BRASIL, 2013), but there is an expectative of increase in the production (ROUBACH et al., 2015). This fish has also been farmed in the Colombian Amazon (VERJÁN et al., 2001) and Peruvian Amazon regions (GONZALES et al., 2009). In addition to the interest in this fish due to its good husbandry performance (BRABO et al., 2013), it has also been used in breeding with other serrasalmid species, such as Colossoma macropomum Cuvier, 1818 and Piaractus mesopotamicus Holmberg, 1887 (ROUBACH et al., 2015). However, little information on parasitic diversity in P. brachypomus is available. For P. brachypomus farmed in Colombia, infection by monogenoideans, myxosporidians, Piscinoodinium pillulare, Trichodina sp. and Ichthyophthirius multifiliis has been reported (VERJÁN et al., 2001). Mymarothecium viatorum has been described from P. brachypomus in the Oder River, Poland (BOEGER et al., 2002), and following was reported in this same host farmed in Brazil (COHEN & KOHN, 2005). For farmed P. brachypomus in northeastern Brazil, Cohen & Kohn (2009) registered occurrence of Anacanthorus penilabiatus and M. viatorum.

In wild P. brachypomus, Travassos (1923) described Echinorhynchus jucundus, which was redescribed by Machado-Filho (1948). For this host from the Amazon region, Dadaytrema oxycephala (THATCHER, 1979), Dolops bidentata (MALTA, 1984) and Perulernaea pirapitingae (THATCHER, 2000) have been described. However, the parasites community structure in wild populations of P. brachypomus has been not investigated.

Studies on parasitic communities of wild fish populations increase understanding of the parasite-host-environment interactions, because parasites may be indicators of environmental conditions and of their hosts (BRASIL-SATO & SANTOS, 2003; GUIDELLI et al., 2003; TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2014; HOSHINO et al., 2014). In addition to interfering with the growth of the fish population, parasites can directly or indirectly affect fish farming production (TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2001a, b) and the fishing industry. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate the metazoans component community that parasitizes P. brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, northern Brazil.

Materials and Methods

Study area and fish collection

In October 2012, 34 specimens of P. brachypomus were collected lower in the Amazon River, near the city of Gurupá, in the state of Pará, Brazil (Figure 1), using nets (mesh 50-70 mm), for parasitological analysis. This study was developed in accordance with the principles recommended by the Brazilian College of Animal Experimentation (COBEA).

Figure 1 Collection locality of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, Northern Brazil. 

Parasite collection and analysis procedures

The fish were weighed (g) and their total length was measured (cm). They were then necropsied, and the mouth, gills, operculum, fins, viscera and gastrointestinal tract were examined for the presence of metazoan. The collection, fixation, preservation and preparation of the parasites for identification followed the recommendations of Eiras et al. (2006).

To analyze the parasite infracommunities, the ecological terms used were also those recommended by Bush et al. (1997). The following descriptors for the parasite community were calculated: species richness; Brillouin diversity index (HB); evenness (E) in association with diversity index and Berger-Parker dominance index (d); and dominance frequency, i.e. the percentage of the infracommunities in which a given parasite species is numerically dominant (ROHDE et al., 1995; MAGURRAN, 2004), using the Diversity software (Pisces Conservation Ltd., UK). The dispersion index (ID) and discrepancy index (D) were calculated using the Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 software, in order to detect the distribution pattern of the parasite infracommunities (RÓZSA et al., 2000), for species with prevalence > 10%. The significance of the ID, for each infracommunity, was tested using the d-statistic (LUDWIG & REYNOLDS, 1988).

The fish weight (g) and total length (cm) data were used to calculate the relative condition factor (Kn) of the hosts, which was compared with standard value (Kn = 1.00), using the t test. Body weight (g) and total length (cm) were also used to calculate the length-weight relationship (W = aLb) after logarithmic transformation of length (L) and weight (W). Subsequently, two straight lines were fitted to the data, thus obtaining lny = lnA + Blnx (LE-CREN, 1951). The Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) was used to determine possible correlations of parasite abundance with length and weight, and also with parasite species richness and the Brillouin diversity of the hosts; and correlations between monogenoidean species (ZAR, 2010).

Principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out to evaluate e the influences of body and diversity on the parasites communities of A. falcirostris and A. falcatus, and this was done using the Past-Paleontological Statistics software, version 3.0.

Results

The specimens of P. brachypomus had 31.7 ± 5.7 cm (13-40 cm) and 745.6 ± 304.9 g (60-1460 g), and were parasitized by one or more metazoan species, such as Anacanthorus spathulatus, M. viatorum, Notozothecium janauachensis (Monogenoidea); Contracaecum sp., Spectatus spectatus (Nematoda); Clinostomum marginatum, Dadaytrema oxycephala Diesing, 1836 (Digenea), Ergasilus sp. and Argulus carteri (Crustacea). However, S. spectatus was the dominant species, followed by monogenoidean species (Table 1).

Table 1 Parasites metazoans of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil.  

Parasite species P (%) MI MA FD (%) TNP SI
Anacanthorus spathulatus Kritsky et al., 1979 100 109.2 109.2 0.1356 3714 Gills
Mymarothecium viatorumBoeger et al., 2002 100 96.9 96.9 0.1203 3295 Gills
Notozothecium janauachensisBelmont-Jégu et al., 2004 100 29.2 29.2 0.0363 993 Gills
Spectatus spectatusTravassos, 1923 17.6 2646.2 466.9 0.580 15877 Intestine
Spectatus spectatusTravassos, 1923 2.9 1787.0 52.6 0.0650 1787 Abdominal cavity
Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 (larvae) 32.3 3.5 1.1 0.0010 39 Intestine
Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 (larvae) 5.9 1.5 0.09 0.0001 3 Pyloric cecum
Contracaecum Railliet & Henry, 1912 (larvae) 14.7 1.4 0.2 0.0002 7 Abdominal cavity
Clinostomum marginatum Rudolphi, 1819 (metacercariae) 2.9 1.0 0.03 0.00004 1 Intestine
Dadaytrema oxycephala Diesing, 1836 (metacercariae) 11.7 0.8 0.1 0.0002 5 Gills
Dadaytrema oxycephala Diesing, 1836 2.9 1.0 0.03 0.00004 1 Pyloric caecum
Dadaytrema oxycephala Diesing, 1836 91.3 0.02 48.4 0.06 1647 Intestine
Dadaytrema oxycephala Diesing, 1836 5.8 5.5 0.3 0.0004 11 Abdominal cavity.
Ergasilus Nordmann, 1832 2.9 1.0 0.06 0.00007 2 Gills
Argulus carteri Cunnington, 1931 2.9 1.0 0.03 0.00004 1 Gills

P: Prevalence; MI: Mean intensity; MA: Mean abundance; FD: Frequency of dominance; TNP: Total number of parasites; SI: Site of infection.

The parasites showed an aggregated dispersion pattern, except for infection by D. oxycephala in the gills of the hosts and Contracaecum sp., in the abdominal cavity, which presented random dispersion (Table 2). The metazoan community was dominated by species of endoparasites (Table 3).

Table 2 Dispersion index (DI), d-statistic and discrepancy index (D) for the parasite infracommunities of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

Parasites DI d D Dispersion
Anacanthorus spathulatus 4.950 10.014 0.352 Aggregated
Mymarothecium viatorum 3.059 6.148 0.299 Aggregated
Notozothecium janauachensis 2.989 5.098 0.349 Aggregated
Dadaytrema oxycephala (gills) 1.291 1.176 0.874 Random
Dadaytrema oxycephala (intestine) 4.764 9.672 0.424 Aggregated
Spectatus spectatus (intestine) 3.828 7.834 0.848 Aggregated
Contracaecum sp. (intestine) 2.364 4.430 0.760 Aggregated
Contracaecum sp. (abdominal cavity) 1.192 0.809 0.848 Random

Table 3 Component community of the parasite metazoans of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

Characteristics
Number of hosts examined 34
Total prevalence (%) of parasites 100
Total number of parasites 27,384
Species of ectoparasites 6
Percentage of ectoparasites 29.2
Species of endoparasites 4
Percentage of endoparasites 70.2
Species of endoparasites (adults) 2
Species of endoparasites (larvae) 2
Species of ectoparasites (adults) 5
Species of ectoparasites (larvae) 1

The Brillouin diversity index and species richness of parasites were high, while the evenness and Berger-Parker dominance were low (Table 4). The hosts were predominantly infected by 4-6 species (Figure 2). The lengths of the hosts were not correlated with Brillouin diversity (rs = 0.140; p = 0.420) or with the richness of parasite species (rs = 0.092; p = 0.604). However, PCA analysis based on the body and diversity parameters showed that the two main factors together accounted for approximately 82.2% of the variance. The species richness, Brillouin index and evenness were the main factors relating to P. brachypomus (Figure 3).

Table 4 Diversity descriptors for communities of metazoans in Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

Diversity indices Mean ± SD (range)
Species richness 5 ± 1 (3-7)
Brillouin index (HB) 1.02 ± 0.25 (0.11-1.35)
Evenness (E) 0.39 ± 0.09 (0.04-0.51)
Berger-Parker index (d) 0.53 ± 0.13 (0.36-0.98)

Figure 2 Species richness of parasites for Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

Figure 3 Scatterplot scores from principal component analysis (PCA) on factors influencing the parasite communities of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

The abundance of A. spathulatus showed a positive correlation with the abundance of M. viatorum (rs = 0.768; p = 0.0001) and the abundance of N. janauachensis (rs = 0.633; p = 0.0001), which also presented a positive correlation with the abundance of M. viatorum (rs = 0.520; p = 0.001).

For P. brachypomus, the equation that described the length-weight relationship was y = 0.0362x2.8513 (r2 = 0.975), thus showing that growth was allometrically negative, i.e. that there were greater increases in body mass than in size. The Kn (1.00 ± 0.02) of the hosts did not differ (t = 0.031; p = 0.975) from the standard (Kn = 1.00), and did not show any correlation (p = 0.05) with the abundance of parasites. However, the abundance of A. spathulatus, M. viatorum and D. oxycephala presented positive correlation with host length and weight (Table 5).

Table 5 Spearman correlation coefficient (rs) for metazoan species abundance in relation to total length, body weight and Kn of Piaractus brachypomus in the lower Amazon River, in Brazil. 

Length Body weight Kn
Parasites rs p rs p rs p
Anacanthorus spathulatus 0.6105 0.0001 0.6271 0.0001 0.0150 0.9329
Mymarothecium viatorum 0.4899 0.0032 0.5916 0.0002 0.2968 0.0882
Notozothecium janauachensis 0.2671 0.1267 0.2693 0.1235 –0.1386 0.4342
Dadaytrema oxycephala (gills) –0.2494 0.1548 –0.2682 0.1251 –0.1877 0.2878
Dadaytrema oxycephala (intestine) 0.5051 0.0023 0.5057 0.0023 0.1112 0.5314
Dadaytrema oxycephala (abdominal cavity) 0.1918 0.2771 0.1320 0.4566 –0.0073 0.9671
Spectatus spectatus –0.1088 0.5401 –0.1247 0.4824 0.1173 0.5089
Contracaecum sp. (intestine) 0.1302 0.4631 0.0897 0.6140 0.1302 0.4631
Contracaecum sp. (abdominal cavity) 0.0301 0.8658 0.1059 0.5511 –0.2535 0.1479

Discussion

Host fish feeding habits are among the most influential factors determining the endoparasites fauna composition, since many of the animals that play the role of intermediate host for parasites are also found in the diet of the final host (GUIDELLI et al., 2003; BRASIL-SATO & SANTOS, 2003; BULLARD & OVERSTREET, 2008; HOSHINO et al., 2014). For P. brachypomus, the metazoan component community was composed of three species of monogenoideans, two of digeneans, two of nematodes and two of crustaceans. Endoparasites species were dominant, thus reflecting the mode of life of this omnivorous host, which occupies a secondary level in the food chain. The parasite species presented an aggregated dispersion, which is a common distribution pattern for freshwater fish, because of the wide dimensions of the hosts’ ecological niches, the genetic heterogeneity and the heterogeneity of exposure and susceptibility of the host population (DOBSON, 1990; POULIN, 2013; HOSHINO et al., 2014; TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2015). In contrast, infections by Contracaecum sp. and D. oxycephala showed random dispersion, which is a characteristic pattern of parasites with moderate or high pathogenicity and with reduced ability to colonize hosts (DOBSON, 1990; GUIDELLI et al., 2003).

Piaractus brachypomus was parasitized by A. spathulatus, M. viatorum and N. janauachensis, but the lowest infection levels in were caused by N. janauachensis, a natural monogenoidean of Colossoma macropomum gills (BELMONT-JÉGU et al., 2004). Therefore, this is the first report of N. janauachensis in P. brachypomus. Furthermore, it appears that there was no competition between these three monogenoidean species with moderate levels of infection, since the correlation between the abundance of these parasites was positive. A similar finding was reported among Cichlidogyrus halli, Cichlidogyrus sclerosus, Scutogyrus longicornis, Cichlidogyrus dossoui and Cichlidogyrus tilapiae, and among S. longicornis, C. dossoui and C. tilapiae in the gills of Oreochromis mossambicus, due to lack of competition among these monogenoidean species (MADANIRE-MOYO et al., 2011). In contrast, the competition between Dactylogyrus carpathicus and Dactylogyrus malleus was due to high abundance and microhabitat preference for the gills of Barbus barbus (KADLEC et al., 2003). The abundance of A. spathulatus and M. viatorum increased with the growth of P. brachypomus, thus indicating that larger hosts harbor greater quantities of these parasites on the gills, due to the degree of specialization of this organ for fixation and the availability of infective forms of monogenoideans in larger hosts (LUQUE & CHAVES, 1999).

Parasitic crustaceans generally have a low abundance of infection in wild fish populations (MALTA & VARELLA, 1983; TAVARES-DIAS et al., 2015), but they can cause great damage to farmed fish due to high abundance (TAVARES DIAS et al., 2015), which can be favored by aggregation of the fish. On the gills of P. brachypomus, only two specimens of Ergasilus sp. and one specimen of A. carteri were found. Twenty species of Ergasilus are known to parasitize freshwater fish in Brazil, but no species has been identified yet in P. brachypomus. However, A. carteri was previously only known to parasitize Hoplias malabaricus in Brazil and Paraguay (THATCHER, 2006; LUQUE et al., 2013). Therefore, the present study provides the first report of A. carteri in P. brachypomus.

Digeneans have wide geographic distribution and host range, given that they parasitize different vertebrate species, especially fish and fish-eating birds. The life cycles of these endoparasites usually include three hosts: mollusks, fish and birds (BRASIL-SATO & SANTOS, 2003; BULLARD & OVERSTREET, 2008). In fish, infection by digeneans occurs trophically when infective forms are ingested from infected mollusks (MORLEY, 2012), or through direct contact with the larval forms on vegetation (BRASIL-SATO & SANTOS, 2003; MORLEY, 2012). Dadaytrema oxycephala, a digenean species with distribution in South America (THATCHER, 1979; BRASIL-SATO & SANTOS, 2003; KOHN et al., 2007) was found in several organs (gills, abdominal cavity, pyloric caecum and intestine) of P. brachypomus, but the highest levels of infection occurred in the intestine. The abundance of this digenean increased with the growth of P. brachypomus, thus indicating that there was an accumulation of D. oxycephala in the host. Bellay et al. (2012) and Yamada et al. (2012) have reported similar finding for other parasite species. Metacercariae of C. marginatum were found in the gills of P. brachypomus, but at low levels of infection that seem be accidental. Therefore, P. brachypomus, a omnivorous fish (SANTOS et al., 2006; SOARES et al., 2011; QUEIROZ et al., 2013), is the definitive host for D. oxycephala in the region of the present study. This was the first record of C. marginatum in P. brachypomus.

Spectatus spectatus occurred in the intestine and abdominal cavity of P. brachypomus, but the highest intensity was found in the intestine. Thus, this nematode can migrate through the body of its hosts (DIAS et al., 2010). It has also been found to infect Myletes sp., P. mesopotamicus (Serrasalmidae) and Pterodoras granulosus (Doradidae) in different localities in South America (MORAVEC, 1998), but it occurs at highest abundance in P. mesopotamicus (SANTOS et al., 2003). Therefore, this high intensity of S. spectatus suggests that P. brachypomus is a secondary intermediate host for these endoparasites of unknown life cycle. In contrast, larvae of Contracaecum sp. were found at low infection levels in the intestine, pyloric cecum and abdominal cavity of P. brachypomus, similar to the results reported for Hemibrycon surinamensis of the Amazon River system (HOSHINO et al., 2014). Although this anisakid without parasitic specificity occurs in several fish freshwater in South America, this was the first record of Contracaecum sp. in P. brachypomus.

Finally, the metazoans community of P. brachypomus was characterized by high species richness of metazoans, low evenness uniformity and high diversity, which was not influenced by the size of the hosts except in relation to the monogenoidean community. The presence of endohelminth larvae suggests that the host is part of the diet of fish at the top of the food chain, and possibly part of the diet of aquatic mammals in the Amazon River. Furthermore, the body conditions of this host were not affected by the moderate parasitism. This first study on the diversity of metazoan parasites in P. brachypomus may provide support for intensive farming of this species in the Amazon region.

Acknowledgements

M. Tavares-Dias was supported by a research fellowship from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq, Brazil).

References

Arnesen AA, Silva TSF, Hess LL, Novo EMLM, Rudorff CM, Chapman BD, et al. Monitoring flood extent in the lower Amazon River floodplain using ALOS/PALSAR ScanSAR images. Remote Sens Environ 2013; 130: 51-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.10.035. [ Links ]

Bellay S, Ueda BH, Takemoto RM, Lizama AP, Pavanelli GC. Fauna parasitária de (Perciformes: Cichlidae) em reservatórios do estado do Paraná, Brasil. Geophagus brasiliensisRev Bras Biocienc 2012; 10(1): 74-78. [ Links ]

Belmont-Jégu E, Domingues MV, Martins ML. n. sp. (Monogenoidea: Dactylogyridae) from wild and cultured tambaqui, . Notozothecium janauachensisColossoma macropomum (Teleostei: Characidae: Serrasalminae) in BrazilZootaxa 2004; 736: 1-8. [ Links ]

Boeger WA, Piasecki W, Sobecka E. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 44. Mymarothecium viatorum sp. n. (Ancyrocephalinae) from the gill of Piaractus brachypomus (Serrasalmidae, Teleostei) captured in a warm-water canal of a power plant in Szczecin, Poland. Acta Ichthyol Piscat 2002; 32(2): 157-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.3750/AIP2002.32.2.06. [ Links ]

Brabo MF, Flexa CE, Veras GC, Paiva RS, Fujimoto RY. Viabilidade econômica da piscicultura em tanques-rede no reservatório da usina hidrelétrica de Tucuruí, Estado do Pará. Informações Econômicas 2013; 43(3): 56-64. [ Links ]

Brasil. Ministério da Pesca e Aquicultura – MPA. Produção pesqueira e aquícola 2011. Brasília; 2013. [ Links ]

Brasil-Sato MC, Santos MD. Helmintos de (Lütken, 1875) (Characiformes: Serrasalminae) do Rio São Francisco, Brasil. Myleus micansRev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(3): 131-134. [ Links ]

Bullard SA, Overstreet RM. Digeneans as enemies of fishes. In: Eiras JC, Segner H, Wahli T, Kapoor BG, editors. Fish diseases. New Hampshire: Science Publishers; 2008. p. 817-976. [ Links ]

Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak W. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol 1997; 83(4): 575-583. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3284227. PMid:9267395. [ Links ]

Ćaleta M, Tutman P, Buj I, Zanella D, Mustafić P, Marčić Z, et al. How was a pirapitinga, Piaractus brachypomus (Serrasalmidae) introduced in Croatian freshwaters? Cybium 2011; 35(3): 259-261. [ Links ]

Cohen SC, Kohn A. A new species of and new hosts and geographical records for (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae), parasites of freshwater fishes in Brazil. MymarotheciumM. viatorumFolia Parasitol 2005; 52(4): 307-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.14411/fp.2005.042. PMid:16405294. [ Links ]

Cohen SC, Kohn A. On Dactylogyridae (Monogenea) of four species of characid fishes from Brazil. Check List 2009; 5(2): 351-356. [ Links ]

Dias FJE, Clemente SCS, Knoff M. Nematoides anisaquídeos e cestoides Trypanorhyncha de importância em saúde pública em Aluterus monoceros (Linnaeus, 1758) no Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2010; 19(2): 94-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01902005. PMid:20624345. [ Links ]

Dobson AP. Models of multi-species parasite-host communities. In: Esch GW, Bush AO, Aho J. Parasite communities: patterns and process. New York: Chapman & Hall; 1990. p. 261-288.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0837-6_10. [ Links ]

Eiras JC, Takemoto RM, Pavanelli GC. Métodos de estudo e técnicas laboratoriais em parasitologia de peixes. Maringá: Eduem; 2006. [ Links ]

Ferreira E, Zuanon J, Santos G, Amadio S. A ictiofauna do Parque Estadual do Cantão, Estado do Tocantins, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 2011; 11(2): 277-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032011000200028. [ Links ]

Ferreira EJG, Zuanon JAS, Santos GM. Peixes comerciais do médio Amazonas: região de Santarém, Pará. Brasília: IBAMA; 1998. [ Links ]

Gonzales JT, Bocanegra FA, Pizarro MDA, Guerra RC, Mori-Pinedo L, Chu-Koo F. Paco y gamitana . Piaractus brachypomusColossoma macropomum criados em policultivo con el bujurqui-tucunaré, Chaetobranchus semifasciatus (Cichlidae)Folia Amazónica 2009; 18: 97-104. [ Links ]

Guidelli GM, Isaac A, Takemoto RM, Pavanelli GC. Endoparasite infracommunities of (Valenciennes, 1840) (Pisces: Pimelodidae) of the Baía River, upper Paraná River floodplain, Brazil: specific composition and ecological aspects. Hemisorubim platyrhynchosBraz J Biol 2003; 63(2): 261-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000200011. PMid:14509848. [ Links ]

Hoshino MDFG, Hoshino EM, Tavares-Dias M. First study on parasites of Hemibrycon surinamensis (Characidae), a host from the eastern Amazon region. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2014; 23(3): 343-347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612014069. PMid:25271454. [ Links ]

Isaac VJ, Milstein A, Ruffino ML. A pesca artesanal no baixo Amazonas: análise multivariada da captura por espécie. Acta Amaz 1996; 26(3): 185-208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921996263208. [ Links ]

Kadlec D, Simková A, Gelnar M. The microhabitat distribution of two Dactylogyrus species parasitizing the gills of the barbel, Barbus barbus.J Helminthol 2003; 77(4): 317-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/JOH2003183. PMid:14627448. [ Links ]

Kohn A, Fernandes BMM, Cohen SC. South American trematodes parasites of fishes. Rio de Janeiro: Imprinta Express; 2007. [ Links ]

Le-Cren ED. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonadal weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J Anim Ecol 1951; 20(2): 201-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1540. [ Links ]

Ludwig JA, Reynolds JF. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York: Wiley-Interscience; 1988. [ Links ]

Luque JL, Chaves ND. Ecologia da comunidade de metazoários parasitos da anchova (Linnaeus) (Osteichthyes, Pomatomidae) do litoral do estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Pomatomus saltatorRev Bras Zool 1999; 16(3): 711-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81751999000300010. [ Links ]

Luque JL, Vieira FM, Takemoto RM, Pavanelli GC, Eiras JC. Checklist of Crustacea parasitizing fishes from Brazil. Check List 2013; 9(6): 1449-1470. http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/9.6.1449. [ Links ]

Machado-Filho DA. “Echinorhynchidae” do Brasil. I. Três espécies novas de “Echinorhynchus” Zoega in Mueller, 1776 e redescrição de Travassos, 1923. Echinorhynchidae jacundusRev Bras Biol 1948; 8(2): 265-273. [ Links ]

Madanire-Moyo GN, Matla MM, Olivier PAS, Luus-Powell WJ. Population dynamics and spatial distribution of monogeneans on the gills of (Peters, 1852) from two lakes of the Limpopo River System, South Africa. Oreochromis mossambicusJ Helminthol 2011; 85(2): 146-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X10000301. PMid:20663243. [ Links ]

Magurran AE. Measuring biological diversity. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 2004. [ Links ]

Malta JCO, Varella A. Os argulíddeos (Crustacea: Branchiura) da Amazônia brasileira: aspectos da ecologia de Bouvier, 1899 e Castro, 1949. Dolops striataDolops carvalhoiActa Amaz 1983; 13(2): 299-306. [ Links ]

Malta JCO. Os peixes de um lago de várzea da Amazônia central (Lago Janauacá, Rio Solimões) e suas relações com os crustáceos ectoparasitas (Branchiura: Argulidae). Acta Amaz 1984; 14(3-4): 355-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921984143372. [ Links ]

Mérona B, Juras AA, Santos GM, Cintra IHA. Os peixes e a pesca no baixo Rio Tocantins: vinte anos depois da UHE Tucuruí. Brasília: Eletrobrás; 2010. [ Links ]

Mérona B. Aspectos ecológicos da ictiofauna no baixo Tocantins. Acta Amaz 1987; 16/17: 109-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1809-43921987171124. [ Links ]

Moravec F. Nematodes of freshwater fishes of the Neotropical region. Praha: Vydala Academia; 1998. [ Links ]

Morley NJ. Cercariae (Platyhelminthes: Trematoda) as neglected components of zooplankton communities in freshwater habitats. Hydrobiologia 2012; 691(1): 7-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1029-9. [ Links ]

Poulin R. Explaining variability in parasite aggregation levels among host samples. Parasitology 2013; 140(4): 541-546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012002053. PMid:23343821. [ Links ]

Queiroz LJ, Torrente-Vilara G, Hoara WM, Pires THS, Zuanon J, Doria CRC. Peixes do rio madeira. 1st ed. São Paulo: Dialeto Latin American; 2013. [ Links ]

Rohde K, Hayward C, Heap M. Aspects of the ecology of metazoan ectoparasites of marine fishes. Int J Parasitol 1995; 25(8): 945-970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0020-7519(95)00015-T. PMid:8550295. [ Links ]

Roubach R, Ostrensky A, Schulter EP, Bueno GW. Aquaculture planning, development In Brazilian Federal waters. Global Aquacul Adv 2015; 18(40): 41-43. [ Links ]

Rózsa L, Reiczigel J, Majoros G. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. J Parasitol 2000; 86(2): 228-232. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0228:QPISOH]2.0.CO;2. PMid:10780537. [ Links ]

Santos GM, Ferreira EJG, Zuanon JAS. Peixes comerciais de Manaus. Manaus: Ibama/AM, PróVárzea; 2006. [ Links ]

Santos SMC, Ceccarelli PS, Rêgo RF. Helmintos em peixes do Pantanal sul-mato-grossense: primeira expedição do Programa Pantanal. Bol Téc CEPTA 2003; 16: 15-26. [ Links ]

Soares MGM, Costa EL, Siqueira-Souza F, Anjos HDB, Yamamoto KC, Freitas CEC. Peixes de lagos do Médio Rio Solimões. 2nd ed. Manaus: Instituto Piatam; 2011. [ Links ]

Tavares-Dias M, Dias-Júnior MBF, Florentino AC, Silva LMA, Cunha AC. Distribution pattern of crustacean ectoparasites of freshwater fish from Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(2): 136-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015036. PMid:26154954. [ Links ]

Tavares-Dias M, Martins ML, Moraes FR. Fauna parasitária de peixes oriundos de “pesque-pague” do município de Franca, São Paulo, Brasil. I. Protozoários. Rev Bras Zool 2001a; 18(S1): 67-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000500005. [ Links ]

Tavares-Dias M, Moraes FR, Martins ML, Kronka SN. Fauna parasitária de peixes oriundos de “pesque-pagues” do município de Franca, São Paulo, Brasil. II. Metazoários. Rev Bras Zool 2001b; 18: 81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-81752001000500006. [ Links ]

Tavares-Dias M, Sousa TJSM, Neves LR. Parasitic infections in two benthopelagic fish from Amazon: The arowana Osteoglossum bicirrhosum (Osteoglossidae) and Oscar (Cichlidae). Astronotus ocellatusBiosci J 2014; 30(2): 546-555. [ Links ]

Thatcher VE. Paramphistomidae (Trematoda: Digenea) de peixes de água doce: dois novos gêneros da Colômbia e uma redescrição de (Diesing, 1836) Travassos, 1934, da Amazônia. Dadaytrema oxycephalaActa Amaz 1979; 9: 203-208. [ Links ]

Thatcher VE. n. sp. (Copepoda: Lernaeidae) a parasite of the serrasalmid fish, from the Meta River, Colombia. Perulernaea pirapitingaePiaractus brachypomusAmazoniana 2000; 16(1-2): 249-257. [ Links ]

Thatcher VE. Amazon fish parasites. 2nd ed. Sofia: Pensoft Publishers; 2006. [ Links ]

Travassos L. Informações sobre a fauna helmintológica de Mato Grosso. Oxyuroides, Kathlaniidae. Folha Med 1923; 4(2): 29-30. [ Links ]

Verján N, Iregui CA, Rey AL, Donado P. Sistematización y caracterización de las lesiones branquiales de la cachama blanca ( ) de cultivo clínicamente sana: algunas interacciones hospedador-patógeno-ambiente. PiaractusbrachypomusRevista AquaTIC 2001; 15. [ Links ]

Yamada FH, Moreira LHA, Ceschini TL, Lizama MLAP, Takemoto RM, Pavanelli GC. Parasitism associated with length and gonadal maturity stage of the freshwater fish (Characidae). Metynnis lippincottianusNeotrop Helminthol 2012; 6(2): 247-253. [ Links ]

Zar JH. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 2010. [ Links ]

Received: October 29, 2015; Accepted: March 07, 2016

*Corresponding author: Marcos Tavares-Dias. Embrapa Amapá, Rodovia Juscelino Kubitschek, Km 5, 2600, CEP 68903-419, Macapá, AP, Brasil. e-mail: marcos.tavares@embrapa.br

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.