Cimicids are hematophagous insects of small size, ranging from 4.5 mm to 7 mm ( ^{FREITAS et al., 1978} ). The original description ( ^{PINTO, 1927} ) was based on absence of wings, pronotum with rounded edges and anterior margins presenting little depth, narrower than the rear margin, with a trapezoidal appearance and body covered with small short bristles. The Cimicidae include six subfamilies, 24 genera and 110 species ( ^{HENRY, 2009} ) and are mainly distributed in the Neotropical region. “Bed bug” is the popular name given to the members of this family for which the life cycle includes egg, nymph and adult stages. These insects are temporary ectoparasites and, between blood meals, they remain in their hosts’ nests or in the cracks or crevices of their hosts’ shelters ( ^{USINGER, 1966} ). Most cimicid species are parasites of birds and bats, but some are parasites of humans and are therefore of public health concern ( ^{COSTA LIMA, 1940} ; ^{FORATTINI, 1990} ).

Some species of the genera Cimex Linnaeus, 1758, Ornithocoris Pinto, 1927; Propicimex Barber, 1941; and Latrocimex Lent, 1941, have been found in Brazil ( ^{RYCKMAN et al., 1981} ). The genus Ornithocoris currently has two valid species: O. toledoi and Ornithocoris pallidus Usinger, 1959. Both species are apparently rare in Brazil. Ornithodoros toledoi has been reported twice on poultry farms in the states of São Paulo ( ^{PINTO, 1927} ) and Minas Gerais ( ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ). It has also been found infesting chickens in other South American countries, such as Bolivia and Argentina ( ^{RYCKMAN et al., 1981} ). Although there is one report of the genus Ornithocoris in the state of Rio Grande do Sul ( ^{OTTO et al., 2008} ), its identification was questioned by ^{Di Iorio et al. (2010)} . The species O. pallidus was described from the nests of Pygochelidon cyanoleuca (Vielliot, 1817) (Aves: Passeriformes) in Viçosa, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Later on, it was reported in the states of Florida and Georgia, USA, associated with chickens and Passeriform birds: Progne subis Linnaeus, 1758, and Passer domesticus Linnaeus, 1758 ( ^{USINGER, 1966} ; ^{WILSON et al., 1986} ). In relation to the distribution of O. toledoi in chicken farms in Brazil, few reports have been observed so far ( ^{PINTO, 1927} ; ^{MORAES, 1939} ; ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ). However, their presence may lead to a decrease in egg production and increase in susceptibility to diseases ( ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ; ^{SNIPES et al., 1940} ). This aspect related to a free-range chicken breeding can cause losses up to the abandon of this activity. Another important aspect is related to its biology, as this parasite was observed in nests of wild birds ( ^{CARPINTERO et al., 2011} ), which demonstrates it has a greater potential of dissemination to other localities.

This study aimed to report the occurrence of O. toledoi to a farm located in the municipality of Valença (22º 14' 44” S; 43º 42' 01” W), state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil ( Figure 1 ) and to add biological, morphologic and epidemiological information about this hematophagous species which is of importance to free-range chicken farms and wild birds.” This farm was primarily set up for milk production, but also raises backyarding poultry such as Gallus gallus, Meleagris gallopavo, Coturnix coturnix and Numida meleagris ( Figures 2 2B). During a technical visit in March 2012, high levels of infestation with small dark wingless insects were observed in the nests inside the chicken coops, in cracks in the walls and roof, and on the birds’ food and fecal waste ( Figure 2 D). Some chickens were also inspected for signs of parasitism ( Figure 2 C).

Figure 1 Geographical location of the area where specimens of Ornithocoris toledoi were observed in free-range chicken farm, in March 2012, in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.  

Figure 2 View of the chicken coops (A and B). Examination of chickens (C). Ornithocoris toledoi seen on the ground in the coop (D).  

Some specimens were collected and placed in polypropylene tubes containing 70% alcohol. These were then transported to the Multiuser Microscopy and Bioimaging Laboratory of the Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ). Eight specimens were cleared in lactophenol at 37 °C and mounted in Hoyer’s medium. An optical microscope was used at 1800s, 400x and 1000x to make the following measurements of body parts: pronotum length(PL); pronotum width (PW); second and third bristles of the posterior pronotum angle (Lb2 and Lb3); first, second, third and fourth antennal flagella (A1, A2, A3 and A4); head width with eyes (HW); PW/HW ratio; interocular space (IS); length of the male genitalia (GL); abdomen length (AL) and width (AW); hemelytra length (HmL) and width (HmW); length of the femur (FL) and tibia (TiL) of the third leg; and total length (TL) of the specimen ( Figure 3 A).

Figure 3 Morphology of Ornithocoris toledoi collected on the farm. Parameter scheme measurements of the O. toledoi specimens (A); O. toledoi observed under stereomicroscope, showing dark brown color (B); Pronotum of O. toledoi wider than long (C); Details pointed with an arrow: pronotum bristles (D); Bristle tufts in the final third of the tibia (E); Sexual organ of the male (F) and female (G).  

All of the measurements were made using the CellD software, version 5.1, under an OLYMPUS BX51 microscope. We compared our specimens with two reference specimens of O. toledoi in the Costa Lima Entomological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute (IOC/FIOCRUZ; accession numbers CCL 5475, slide 4730, female specimen, and CCL 5476, slide 4731, male specimen). Two voucher specimens (female and male) were deposited in the “Angelo Moreira da Costa Lima” Entomological Collection (CECL) of the Biology Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (accession numbers 12501 and 12502, respectively). We identified our specimens in accordance with ^{Pinto (1927)} , ^{Carvalho (1939)} , ^{Moraes (1939)} , ^{Usinger (1959} , ¹⁹⁶⁶ ), ^{Jansen (1979)} , ^{Jurberg & Azevedo (1982)} and ^{Di Iorio et al. (2010)} .

During the technical visit, we observed that these insects moved quickly to hidden in dark crevices and cracks of buildings. Regarding to the chickens, some of them showed signs of weakness, which can be directly related to the high infestation level that was observed in the flock. The presence of this ectoparasite in chicken coops can decrease egg production and increase susceptibility to other diseases ( ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ). Although some studies have indicated that pathogen transmission by other Cimicidae species occurs ( ^{BURTON, 1963} ; ^{DELAUNAY, 2012} ; ^{LEULMI et al., 2015} ), the role of O. toledoi as a vector of pathogens to chickens is unknown.

Also during the technical visit to the farm, we did not see any evidence of the presence of insects in the bodies of chickens, or any lesions suggestive of parasitism by these insects. However, ^{Carvalho (1939)} and ^{Snipes et al. (1940)} reported that the signs caused by the bites of O. toledoi in G. gallus consisted of punctiform hemorrhage and hyperemia at the bite sites, and that they disappeared almost entirely within 12 hours. This may have the cause of the lack of signs in the birds during our visit. In addition, the owner of the farm reported deaths of young chickens, probably due to blood loss resulting from the high of infestation by these insects, which feed during all phases of their life cycle ( ^{USINGER, 1966} ).

Accordingly, identification of O. toledoi was based on the following characters: pronotum wider than long ( Figure 3 C); second segment, of the antenna wider than the third and fourth ones; presence of two pairs of bristles in the posterior prothoracic angles (Lb2 and Lb3) ( Figure 3 D); presence of two tufts in the final thirds of tibia I and II in males, and only in tibia II in females ( Figure 3 E); presence of spicule in males; presence of Ribaga’s organ in the dorsal region of in females ( Figure 3 3G). These external characters of the genitalia are typical of O. toledoi ( ^{JANSEN, 1979} ; ^{JURBERG & AZEVEDO, 1982} ). As expected, these measurements varied between the specimens collected ( Table 1 ) and among specimens of O. toledoi from other regions ( ^{PINTO, 1927} ; ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ; ^{MORAES, 1939} ; ^{USINGER, 1966} ; ^{JANSEN, 1979} ; ^{DI IORIO et al. 2010} ). Morphometric variations may be influenced by the specimen’s physiological status, adaptive changes, genetic differences ( ^{DUJARDIN & SLICE, 2007} ), feeding or climatic conditions ( ^{JANSEN, 1979} ).

Despite the morphological similarities between O. toledoi and O. pallidus, they can be separated by the dark-brown body ( Figure 3 B), which is typical of O. toledoi ( ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ; ^{JANSEN, 1979} ; ^{MORAES, 1939} ; ^{PINTO, 1927} ), and the ratio between the width and pronotum head width (PW/HW) proposed by ^{Usinger (1966)} . In the specimens collected by us, this ratio (PW/HW) was approximately 1.8, matching the diagnosis of O. toledoi by ^{Usinger (1966)} and ^{Di Iorio et al. (2010)} .

Regarding insect/host relationships, specimens were collected from chickens, thus confirming the association of this species with this typical host ( ^{CARVALHO, 1939} ; ^{MORAES, 1939} ; ^{PINTO, 1927} ). Recently, the species O. toledoi was also described from nests of birds Psittacidae ( ^{CARPINTERO et al., 2011} ), which suggests that this species may use wild birds as hosts, but further research is needed to clarify this issue.

Two years after the first technical visit, these ectoparasites were no longer observed in the chicken coops, probably due to the effective chemical control recommended to the farmer.