Introduction
Clarias gariepinus Burchell, 1822, popularly known as African catfish, is a pulmonary fish from Africa (ERSOY & OZEREN, 2009) which was introduced in Brazil for commercial purposes in the mid-1980s (OZÓRIO et al., 2004), and its breeding in atypical tanks without protection barriers near the river and Lake beds resulted in escape and invasion of the surrounding environment. Clarias gariepinus is considered an omnivorous species (TEUGELS, 1986), and there are no studies on infection by metacercariae of digeans in this fish outside Africa.
The metacercariae of the family Diplostomidae are important pathogens that can cause serious impacts on fish health in fish populations from the natural habitat as well as in aquaculture. This larval stage can cause mortality in young fish by capillary hemorrhage and blood vessel obstruction (mainly in the head and brain), loss of vision, growth reduction, and emaciation, deformation of the vertebral column, brain tumor and cellular necrosis, which can lead to death (SZIDAT & NANI, 1951; CHAPPELL et al., 1994; CHAPPELL, 1995; NIEWIADOMSKA, 1996; MACHADO et al., 2005). This study aimed to describe the first report of metacercariae of Diplostomidae in C. gariepinus in Brazil.
Materials and Methods
A total of 30 C. gariepinus were captured from the Jacaré Lake, district of Tocos, in the city of Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Fish were kept in isothermal boxes with ice to reduce the desensitization stress, euthanized by freezing and stored at -20 °C.
The necropsy procedure, parasite collection, fixation and conservation were performed according to Amato et al. (1991) and Eiras et al. (2010). The organs and viscera were removed and separated in Petri dishes with 0.65% saline solution, washed in sieves with 0.025-mm mesh, dissected and analyzed under a stereomicroscope. After removal of all viscera, the coelomic cavity was washed with distilled water and passed in a sieve with the same mesh, and the retained material was observed under a stereomicroscope and analyzed for the presence of parasites.
Light microscopy
Metacercariae were fixed in hot AFA (70° GL ethanol, 93%; formaldehyde, 5%; glacial acetic acid, 2%) for 48 hours and conserved in 70% ethanol. Specimens were stained in Semichon’s Carmine and Gomori’s trichrome (in this case, worms were hydrated before staining), dehydrated in an increasing ethanol series, differentiated in 2% acetic acid, clarified in clove oil and mounted between lamina and cover slips with Dammar Gum.
Measurements were performed to the nearest micron (range (mean ± S.D.)) and were based on nine specimens from multiple fish. Measurements were conducted with an Axioplan Zeiss light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with a Canon Power-Shot A640 digital camera (Canon, China) and Zeiss Axion Vision Sample Images Software (Carl Zeiss, Germany) for image analysis. Drawings were performed with the aid of an Axioplan Zeiss light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) equipped with a camera lucida and were digitized using Adobe Photoshop Elements 8.0 software with the aid of an Intuos4 Wacon® pen tablet (Wacon Co. Ltd, Japan).
Scanning electron microscopy
Ten metacercariae specimens were fixed in Karnovsky solution (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 4% freshly prepared paraformaldehyde, 5 mM calcium chloride in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2), washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, post-fixed in 2% 0.1 M osmium tetroxide, 5 mM calcium chloride and 0.8 potassium ferrocyanide in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. The samples were dehydrated in an acetone series, critical point dried with CO2, sputter-coated with gold, and examined in a Zeiss EVO MA 10 scanning electron microscope (SEM) operating at 15 kV.
Results
Two males (7%) and seven females (23%) of C. gariepinus were infected with trematode metacercariae. Larvae were collected from the washing of the gills, suprabranchial organs, heart, stomach, intestinal mesentery, liver and body cavity. A total of 190 metacercariae were collected, of which 98 (52%) were in C. gariepinus males and 92 (48%) in C. gariepinus females. The metacercariae collected from different organs present similar morphology. They were identified as metacercariae of the Diplostomidae of the ‘Diplostomulum’ morphotype.
The metacercariae of Diplostomoidae had a foliate body (Figure 1a, b), measuring 618 to 913 (761 ± 109.3) long by 197 to 304 (246 ± 38.5) wide. Papillae and denticles were not observed by light microscopy and SEM (Figure 1). The body was composed of a long and discreet forebody, followed by a small hindbody. The forebody measured 560 to 739 (633 ± 77.3) long, where a subterminal oral sucker was observed measuring 46 to 64 (55 ± 6.5) long by 42 to 67 (54 ± 7.0) wide. Muscular pharynx ranging from 23 to 47 (34 ± 7.5) long by 19 to 32 (39 ± 4.4) wide, followed by a short esophagus measuring 26 to 28 (27 ± 0.7) long, which bifurcated into two long intestinal caeca with a blind end near the hindbody. The ventral sucker measured 37 to 51 (44 ± 3.7) long by 35 to 49 (43 ± 4.2) wide, with a distance of 352 to 612 (458 ± 79.5) from the anterior extremity. Holdfast organs present with an elliptical shape and a median fissure observed under light microscopy (Figure 1a, b), located between the ventral sucker and the posterior region of the body, measuring 67 to 115 (87 ± 18.9) long by 56 to 97 (75 ± 14.9) wide. This structure was not observed by SEM (Figure 1c). The hindbody measured 57 to 81 (69 ± 9.7) long. Three main longitudinal canals are present, one medial and two laterals, connected by a commissure in the anterior region of the body, near the level of the pharynx and another posteriorly, anterior to the ventral sucker, with several terminal pockets with rounded excretory bodies distributed throughout the body (Figure 2). Y-shaped excretory vesicle present near the posterior extremity of the body. Genital primordium absent (Figure 1a and Figure 2).

Figure 1 Metacercariae of Diplostomidae in Clarias gariepinus from the Jacaré Lake in Campos dos Goytacazes, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (a) light microscopy of the specimens stained in Semichon’s Carmine. Bar 100 µm; (b) light microscopy of specimens stained in Gomori’s trichrome. Bar 100 µm; (c) scanning electron microscopy. Oral sucker (os); holdfast organ (ho); reserve bladder (rb); ventral sucker (vs). Bar 200 µm.

Figure 2 Drawing of metacercariae of Diplostomidae in Clarias gariepinus from the Jacaré Lake in Campos dos Goytacazes, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Bar 100 µm.
Representative specimens were deposited in the Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz Institute (CHIOC), Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (CHIOC No 38868 a-b).
Discussion
The members of Diplostomidae are distinct from the other groups of the Trematoda due to the presence of a unique holdfast organ (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002a), which allowed us to characterize the specimens of Trematoda collected from C. gariepinus from Brazil as belonging to this family (Figure 1a, b; Figure 2). The metacercariae of Diplostomidae have similar morphologies between the different genera, which makes it impossible to identify them at the generic level. However, several authors classify the metacercariae at a generic level (MWITA & NKWENGULILA, 2004; CHIBWANA & NKWENGULILA, 2010), and specific level (BARSON et al., 2008; ZHOKHOV et al., 2010). Few studies developed molecular analyses for the identification of the metacercariae specimens collected from C. gariepinus (MWITA & NKWENGULILA, 2010; CHIBWANA et al., 2013, 2015; MOEMA et al., 2013). In this way, according to Niewiadomska (2002a), these metacercariae are classified into four main morphotypes (‘Diplostomulum’, ‘Naescus’, ‘Prohemistomulum’ and ‘Tetracotyle’) based on the structure of the reserve bladder, however only one study classified the collected metacercariae from C. gariepinus into morphotypes (BARSON et al., 2008). The simplest reserve bladder type is characteristic of the ‘Diplostomulum’ morphotype, which presents three longitudinal canals (one median and two laterals) connected by a commissure at the anterior region of the body, next to the pharynx level, and another located posteriorly, anterior to the ventral sucker. The ramification system of the longitudinal canals is enlarged at the terminal portions, forming a terminal pocket where the excretory bodies are located, which can be oval or rounded in shape (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002a). These characteristics were observed in the metacercariae collected from C. gariepinus of this study, which allowed inferring that these are of the ‘Diplostomulum’ morphotype (Figure 2), different to the morphotype resported by Barson et al. (2008), for metacercaria collected in C. gariepinus from the Save-Runde River, Zimbebwe.
In freshwater fish, the metacercariae of the family Diplostomidae are found encysted, encapsulated in the tissues or free in the tegument, muscles, eyes and central nervous system and are most commonly reported in the last two habitats (GIBSON et al., 2002; THATCHER, 2006). Barson et al. (2008) found encysted diplostomid metacercariae in the muscle and not encysted metacercariae in the intestine of C. gariepinus. However, in C. gariepinus from this study, the metacercariae were observed free in several organs examined, but all of them with similar morphology. There are several reports of the occurrence of diplostomid metacercariae among Diplostomum mashonense Beverly-Burton, 1963, Dolichorchis tregenna and Tylodelphys spp. in the cranial cavity of C. gariepinus in Africa (MASHEGO & SAAYMAN, 1989; MWITA & NKWENGULILA, 2004; MUSIBA & NKWENGULILA, 2006; CHIBWANA & NKWENGULILA, 2010; ZHOKHOV et al., 2010; CHIBWANA et al., 2013, 2015; MOEMA et al., 2013). However, the cranial cavity of the fish from the present study was not analyzed during the necropsies.
Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) classified the diplostomid metacercariae based on the presence or absence of pseudosuckers, distinguishing three genera: Diplostomum and Dolichorchis with pseudosuckers and Tylodelphys without these structures. However, these authors do not describe the metacercariae in morphotypes according to the reserve bladder structure as described in the key to the Superfamily Diplostomoidea (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002a). Furthermore, the three genera cited above present pseudosuckers on adult specimens (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002a). Barson et al. (2008) identified the metacercariae collected from the intestine of C. gariepinus as D. mashonense, based only on the morphology of these larvae. However, the identification at the generic level is not possible based only on the metacercariae morphology, without knowledge of the complete parasite life cycle (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002b). The generic and specific diagnosis is based on the morphology of general characters, mainly that of the reproductive system, which are absent in larval stages. Thus, the trematode identification keys are based on adult worms (DUBOIS, 1968; GIBSON et al., 2002). In this way, the identification of the genus of the metacercariae collected from C. gariepinus from Brazil was not possible. According to Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010), only Shigin (1971) apud Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) developed a key for the identification of this species class based on the intermediate stage, more precisely for the metacercariae, but this study has been written in Russian and its use is restricted to the Palearctic region.
Prudhoe & Hussey (1977) described three species of diplostomid metacercariae from C. gariepinus in South Africa, two as Diplostomum (type I and II) and one as Neodiplostomum. According to these authors, the metacercariae of the genera Diplostomum presented two pseudosuckers next to the oral sucker, which were not observed in the present study. However, Niewiadomska (2002b) affirms that Diplostomum metacercariae can or cannot present pseudosuckers. In Neodiplostomum metacercariae, reported by Prudhoe & Hussey (1977), the pseudosuckers were absent, similar to our study.
The species of the genera Diplostomum, Neodiplostomum and Alaria present a ‘Diplostomulum’ morphotype metacercariae (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002a), which suggests that C. gariepinus from Brazil is an intermediate or paratenic host of at least one of these genera of Trematoda. The metacercariae of the genera Alaria and Neodiplostomum are found mainly in amphibians (second intermediate hosts) and can also be found in reptiles and mammals (as paratenic hosts). However, Diplostomum metacercariae are frequently reported from fish (second intermediate hosts) (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002b). The definitive hosts for the genera that usually possess the ‘Diplostomulum’ morphotype metacercariae in its life cycle are piscivorous birds (Diplostomum and Neodiplostomum) or mammals (Alaria) (NIEWIADOMSKA, 2002b), which indicates that the adult stages of the trematode collected from C. gariepinus from the present study can be found in birds or mammals (Carnivora, Rodentia, Marsupialia), which can be fed C. gariepinus from the studied locality and become infected, thus completing their life cycle.
The comparison of the measurements of the metacercariae from the present study, it was similar to those classified as D. mashonense (BARSON et al., 2008; CHIBWANA & NKWENGULILA, 2010), with exception from the specimens described as D. mashonense by Moema et al. (2013) that presented a longer total body length and holdfast organ length (Table 1). Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) reported the occurrence two types of Tylodelphys sp. metacercariae, being all the type 2 metacercariae collected from different location from Tanzania, presented smaller measurements and those from the type 1 (Kilombero River and Ruvu River) presented a higher total body length, when compared with this study (Table 1). From all the studies analyzes form morphological comparison, only two species metacercariae presented the intestinal caeca ending near the holdfast organ level (MWITA & NKWENGULILA, 2004), similar to our metacercariae. All other studies, the caeca exceeds the holdfast organ (BARSON et al., 2008; CHIBWANA & NKWENGULILA, 2010; ZHOKHOV et al., 2010; MOEMA et al., 2013).
Table 1 Comparison of measurements (µm) of Diplostomidae metacercariae in Clarias gariepinus from the Africa and present.
SPECIMES |
Country (Locality) |
Measured parameters – Range (Mean) | References | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
tbl | mbw | osl | osw | pl | pw | vsl | vsw | d | hol | how | |||
‘Diplostomulum’ | Brazil (Lake Jacaré) |
618-913 (761) | 197-304 (246) | 46-64 (55) | 42-67 (54) | 23-47 (34) | 19-32 (39) | 37-51 (44) | 35-49 (43) | 352-612 (458) | 67-115 (87) | 56-97 (75) | Present study |
Diplostomum mashonense | Zimbabwe (Save-Runde River) |
445-585 (514) | 101-255 (185) | 47-57 (49) | 46-52 (48) | 25-32 (28) | 10-22 (17) | 31-63 (48) | 43-60 (52) | - | 55-63 (59) | 35-47 (42) | Barson et al. (2008) |
Diplostomum mashonense | Tanzania (Kilombero River) |
790 | 224 | 38 | 42 | 38 | 25 | 39 | 39 | 322 | 100 | 73 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Diplostomum mashonense | Tanzania (Lake Victoria) |
699-896 (818) | 180-242 (214) | 30-46 (36) | 29-50 (36) | 35-45 (39) | 19-31 (26) | 29-45 (36) | 29-45 (36) | 299-360 (330) | 100-121 (110) | 60-91 (76) | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Diplostomum mashonense | Tanzania (Mindu Dam) |
831 | 197 | 41 | 46 | 50 | 26 | 44 | 40 | 302 | 97 | 65 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Diplostomum mashonense | Tanzania (Msimbazi River) |
1039 | 240 | 34 | 49 | 30 | 29 | 47 | 49 | 482 | 100 | 84 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Diplostomum mashonense | Tanzania (Ruvu River) |
799 | 250 | 40 | 40 | 31 | 20 | 26 | 37 | 302 | 92 | 70 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Diplostomum mashonense | South Africa (Supersand Dam) |
946-1947 (1409) | 240-485 (375) | 36-90 (70) | 42-96 (72) | 24-60 (46) | 30-60 (47) | 36-90 (71) | 30-96 (67) | - | 156-198 (180) | 24-150 (101) | Moema et al. (2013) |
Diplostomum type I | South Africa (Olifants River) |
530 | 460 | 58 | 58 | - | - | 35 | 43 | 180 | 87 | 87 | Prudhoe & Hussey (1977) |
Diplostomum type II | South Africa (Olifants River) |
810-850 | 200-220 | 40-50 | 40-50 | 25 | 20 | 50 | 45 | 290-320 | 125 | 70 | Prudhoe & Hussey (1977) |
Dolochorchis tregenna | Ethiopia (Lake Tana) |
1010-1330 (1170) | 260-320 (300) | 66-90 (80) | 60-72 (70) | 54-72 (60) | 24-36 (33) | 60-78 (63) | 60-72 (60) | - | 114-180 (160) | 108-180 (130) | Zhokhov et al. (2010) |
Neodiplostomum type | South Africa (Olifants River) |
80-1220 | - | 45-50 | 30-50 | 37 | 30 | 67-75 | 87-100 | - | 120-160 | 100-120 | Prudhoe & Hussey (1977) |
Tylodelphys sp. X | Tanzania (Lake Victoria) |
940-1180 | 160-240 | 48-58 | 60-71 | - | - | 25-35 | 23-37 | - | 83-117 | 44-69 | Mwita & Nkwengulila (2004) |
Tylodelphys sp. Y | Tanzania (Lake Victoria) |
624-860 | 165-250 | 37-50 | 31-55 | - | - | 23-28 | 23-28 | - | 69-81 | 42-74 | Mwita & Nkwengulila (2004) |
Tylodelphys sp. 1 | Tanzania (Kilombero River) |
1043 | 214 | 41 | 41 | 41 | 32 | 38 | 37 | 555 | 117 | 63 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. 1 | Tanzania (Lake Victoria) |
889-1070 (1022) | 180-240 (217) | 30-41 (37) | 31-41 (37) | 30-50 (40) | 20-36 (29) | 30-40 (36) | 21-43 (36) | 470-520 (496) | 71-120 (104) | 50-76 (65) | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. 1 | Tanzania (Ruvu River) |
1231 | 194 | 61 | 59 | 51 | 43 | 44 | 41 | 792 | 163 | 62 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. 2 | Tanzania (Kilombero River) |
560 | 111 | 30 | 29 | 22 | 19 | 21 | 21 | 282 | 61 | 31 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. 2 | Tanzania (Lake Victoria) |
351-650 (495) | 70-150 (100) | 20-38 (28) | 19-37 (28) | 16-32 (23) | 15-22 (19) | 16-27 (21) | 16-73 (21) | 135-333 (248) | 41-84 (61) | 27-49 (37) | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. 2 | Tanzania (Ruvu River) |
667 | 128 | 31 | 31 | 21 | 19 | 21 | 22 | 366 | 60 | 22 | Chibwana & Nkwengulila (2010) |
Tylodelphys grandis n. sp | Ethiopia (Lake Tana) |
1150-1870 (1600) | 360-470 (390) | 60-84 (74) | 48-66 (55) | 42-66 (56) | 18-30 (24) | 18-30 (24) | 54-60 (55) | - | 114-198 (163) | 24-96 (74) | Zhokhov et al. (2010) |
‘Tetracotyle’ | Zimbabwe (Save-Runde River) |
300-438 (361) | 244-320 (286) | 18-50 (36) | 21-49 (36) | 30-48 (39) | 23-36 (29) | 26-50 (36) | 28-59 (44) | - | 40-55 (48) | 60-105 (77) | Barson et al. (2008) |
Abbreviations: total body length (tbl); maximum body width (mbw); oral sucker length (osl); oral sucker width (osw); pharynx lentgh (pl); pharynx width (pw); ventral sucker lentgh (vsl); ventral sucker width (vsw); distance of ventral sucker from the anterior extremity (d); holdfast organ length (hol); holdfast organ width (how).
In the present study, a low prevalence of infection by Diplostomidae metacercariae was observed compared with studies carried out in C. gariepinus from the Africa. However, Barson et al. (2008) reported a lower prevalence than that observed in Brazil. Mwita & Nkwengulila (2004) and Zhokhov et al. (2010) found a prevalence similar to our study however, these authors, despite similar prevalence, observed a higher mean intensity and mean abundance compared to our study. Several studies performed in Africa report high values of mean intensity and abundance in comparison to the values found in C. gariepinus from Brazil (Table 2). This first study on Diplostomidae metacercariae in C. gariepinus from the Brazil suggested that this fish can act as a paratenic host to this native digenean species from Brazil.
Table 2 Metacercariae of Diplostomidae reported in Clarias gariepinus from Africa, compared to those of this host from Jacaré Lake in Campos dos Goytacazes, State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
DIPLOSTOMIDAE | ENCOLOGICAL INDEX | AUTHORS | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PREVALENCE % | MEAN INTENSITY | MEAN ABUNDANCE | ||
Diplostomun mashonense | 93.0 | 2391 | - | Mashego & Saayman (1989) |
88.0 | 538.5 | 473.2 | Mwita & Nkwengulila (2004) | |
97.0 | 619.5 | 598.9 | Musiba & Nkwengulila (2006) | |
11.0 | - | - | Barson et al. (2008) | |
Tylodelphys grandis | 35.0 | - | - | Zhokhov et al. (2010) |
Tylodelphys sp. | 31.0 | 98.4 | 30 | Mwita & Nkwengulila (2004) |
Tylodelphys sp. 1 | 75.0 | 76.7 | 57.2 | Musiba & Nkwengulila (2006) |
Tylodelphys sp. 2 | 94.0 | 393.5 | 370.2 | Musiba & Nkwengulila (2006) |
Metacercariae | 30.0 | 21.1 | 6.3 | Present study |