Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Serological evaluation of Neospora caninum in pregnant women treated at referral center for prenatal screening in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil

Avaliação sorológica de Neospora caninum em gestantes atendidas em centro de referência para triagem pré-natal em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil

Abstract

Neospora caninum is an obligate intracellular protozoan with canids (Canis domesticus, Canis lupus dingo, Canis latrans, Canis lupus) as its definitive hosts. The objective of this study was to detect anti-N. caninum antibodies in pregnant women seen at referral center for prenatal screening in the state of state Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. A total of 188 serum samples from pregnant women provided by the Instituto de Pesquisa, Ensino e Diagnósticos da APAE de Campo Grande (IPED/ APAE) were subjected to IFA test and western blot analysis. The samples were divided into three groups: 23/99 samples from the seropositive group for toxoplasmosis were positive for anti-N. caninum IgG antibodies, and 9/99 positive for IgM; in the HIV group, 7/33 were positive for IgG; and in the HIV+toxoplasmosis group, 13/56 were positive for IgG and two positive for IgM. The seropositivity for IgG was assessed by western blot by testing 43 IFA test positive samples using rNcSRS2 (Nc-p43) as antigen. The serological results of the present study suggest that exposure of these pregnant women to the parasite N. caninum and presence of IgM antibodies are indicative of recent infection. Further studies are needed to establish the possibility of active infection.

Keywords:
Pregnant women; Neospora caninum; IFA test; Western blot

Resumo

Neospora caninum é um protozoário intracelular obrigatório que possui os canídeos (Canis domesticus, Canis lupus dingo, Canis latrans, Canis lupus) como seus hospedeiros definitivos. O objetivo deste trabalho foi detectar anticorpos anti-N. caninum em gestantes, atendidas em centro de referência para triagem pré-natal, em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. Um total de 188 amostras de soro de gestantes, cedidas pelo Instituto de Pesquisa, Ensino e Diagnósticos da APAE de Campo Grande (IPED/ APAE), foram submetidas ao teste de RIFI e western blot para a detecção de anticorpos anti-N. caninum. As amostras foram divididas em três grupos: 23/99 amostras do grupo soropositivo para toxoplasmose demonstraram positividade para anticorpos IgG anti-N. caninum e 9/99 positivos para IgM. No grupo HIV 7/33 apresentaram positividade para IgG. No grupo HIV+Toxoplasmose 13/56 apresentaram positividade para IgG e duas para IgM. A soropositividade para IgG foi avaliada por western blot, testando 43 amostras positivas para RIFI, usando-se rNcSRS2 (Nc-p43) como antígeno. Os resultados sorológicos do presente estudo sugerem exposição dessas gestantes ao parasita N. caninum e a positividade para anticorpos IgM são indicativos de infecção recente. Mais estudos na área são necessários para estabelecer a possibilidade de infecção ativa.

Palavras-chave:
Gestante; Neospora caninum; RIFI; Western blot

Introduction

Neospora caninum is an obligate intracellular protozoan that belongs to the phylum Apicomplexa (Dubey et al., 1988Dubey JP, Carpenter JL, Speer CA, Topper MJ, Uggla A. Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192(9): 1269-1285. PMid:3391851.). It emerged as a serious disease in cattle and dogs (Dubey, 2003Dubey JP. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J Parasitol 2003; 41(1): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1.1. PMid:12666725.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1....
), with canids (Canis domesticus, Canis lupus dingo, Canis latrans, Canis lupus) as definitive hosts (McAllister et al., 1998McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM. Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28(9): 1473-1478. PMid:9770635.; King et al., 2010King JS, Slapeta J, Jenkins DJ, Al-Qassab SE, Ellis JT, Windsor PA. Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(8): 945-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008. PMid:20149793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010....
; Gondim et al., 2004Gondim LFP, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34(2): 159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001. PMid:15037103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004....
; Dubey et al., 2011Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Rajendran C, Miska K, Ferreira LR, Martins J, et al. Gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a natural definitive host for Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 2011; 181(2-4): 382-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018. PMid:21640485.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011....
). The forms of transmission are similar to toxoplasmosis and can be horizontal or vertical. The horizontal form occurs in herbivores via ingestion of water or food contaminated by oocysts and in carnivores via ingestion of tissues infected by tachyzoites or tissue cysts. Vertical transmission occurs transplacentally (Dubey et al., 2007Dubey JP, Schares G, Ortega-Mora LM. Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20(2): 323-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-06. PMid:17428888.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-06...
).

Serological and molecular studies of N. caninum in humans and particularly in pregnant women are still scarce in the literature. As there is a report of detection of N. caninum DNA in two human umbilical cord blood samples (Duarte et al., 2020Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1. PMid:32493968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-659...
) and this parasite is so similar to T. gondii (Barratt et al., 2010Barratt JLN, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. Importance of nonenteric protozoan infections in immunocompromised people. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23(4): 795-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00001-10. PMid:20930074.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00001-10...
; Hemphill et al., 1999Hemphill A, Fuchs N, Sonda S, Hehl A. The antigenic composition of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1999; 29(8): 1175-1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00085-5. PMid:10576569.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)...
) which is responsible for congenital toxoplasmosis, it is important to investigate the prevalence of N. caninum in pregnant women. For this reason, the objective of this study was to detect anti-N. caninum antibodies in pregnant women treated at a referral center for prenatal screening in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Material and Methods

Sample acquisition and data collection

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul – UFMS) on November 3, 2016, under document n. 1,804,047. A total of 188 serum samples from 46 municipalities of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul were provided by the Instituto de Pesquisa, Ensino e Diagnósticos da APAE de Campo Grande (IPED/ APAE), located in Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul. These samples were divided into three groups: group I contained samples from 99 pregnant women serologically positive for toxoplasmosis in the active phase with IgG/IgM positivity; group II contained samples from 33 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive pregnant women; and group III contained samples from 56 pregnant women positive for HIV and IgG toxoplasmosis antibodies. Data were collected from the reports provided by IPED/ APAE, which included the results of the prenatal screening tests.

IFA test

Indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) testing for the detection of anti-N. caninum antibodies was performed using the commercial diagnostic kit Imunoteste® Neospora (RIFI) (Imunodot Diagnostics, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil) following the manufacturer's recommendations, with modifications. The serum samples were initially diluted 1:50, and positive and negative human serum controls established previously during work conducted at the laboratory were used (Oshiro et al., 2015Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015. PMid:26516966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151...
). Human anti-IgG and anti-IgM fluorescent conjugates (1:100 dilution; conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate - Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) were used for the serological tests. The protocol for IFA test was adapted from Paré et al. (1995)Paré J, Hietala SK, Thurmond MC. Interpretation of an indirect fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 1995; 7(2): 273-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104063879500700222. PMid:7619917.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10406387950070...
.

Western blot analysis

For the western blot, a recombinant partial sequence of the NcSRS2 protein (Nc-p43) was used, which presents approximately 29 KDa and the protocol was adapted from Lima et al. (2007)Lima MSC Jr, Andreotti R, Caetano AR, Paiva F, Matos MFC. Cloning and expression of an antigenic domain of a major surface protein (Nc-p43) of Neospora caninum. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2007; 16(2): 61-66. PMid:17706005..

Statistical analysis

The collected data were tabulated and analyzed using the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics, version 20 (IBM Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). The χ2 test were used to evaluate associations between the serological results for N. caninum. P values ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. When the value of the expected frequencies was smaller than five Fisher's exact test was performed.

Results

The analyzed samples came from 46 of the 79 municipalities (Figure 1) in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul. In group I, the pregnant women from whom the samples were obtained had a mean age of 23.18 ± 6.3057 years, and according to the prenatal screening reports, 6% (6/99) of the women were positive for syphilis and 1% (1/99) for hepatitis B. In group II, the mean age was 23.21 years ± 6.1173, and 9.09% (3/33) were positive for syphilis. In group III, the mean age was 26.58 years ± 6.7548 years, and 14.2% (8/56) were positive for syphilis.

Figure 1
Map of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, indicating the municipalities of origin of the analyzed samples.

There was a significant association between age and N. caninum-positive cases in group III (Table 1). In group I, 30 samples were from the state capital of Campo Grande, with 11 positive for N. caninum (IgG and/or IgM), and the remaining 69 samples were from other cities in the interior of the state, 19 (with two samples positive for both antibodies) of which were positive for N. caninum (IgG and/or IgM). In group II, 17 samples were from the capital Campo Grande, of which 3 were positive for N. caninum (IgG), and the other 16 samples were from the other cities in the interior, 4 of which were positive for N. caninum (IgG). In group III, 21 samples were obtained from the capital Campo Grande, 7 of which were positive for N. caninum (IgG), and the remaining 35 samples were from other cities in the interior, 8 of which were positive for N. caninum (IgG and/or IgM) (Table 2).

Table 1
Seropositivity for Neospora caninum according to age group, considering the number of pregnant women positive for IgG and IgM antibodies in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
Table 2
Seropositivity for Neospora caninum according to the proportion of positive and negative pregnant women for IgG and IgM antibodies in each group and the Geographic distribution in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

IFA test

Of the 99 analyzed samples from group I, 23 (23.2%) were positive for IgG antibodies, and 9 (9.09%) were positive for anti-N. caninum IgM antibodies as determined by IFA test. In group II, of the 33 analyzed samples, 7 (21.2%) were positive for IgG only. In group III, of the 56 analyzed samples, 13 (23.2%) were positive for IgG antibodies, and 2 (3.5%) were positive for anti-N. caninum IgM antibodies (Table 2 and Table 3). According to the Fisher's exact test for the presence of IgG and IgM antibodies, the group II (p = 0.05), and III (p = 0.02) showed a difference in the proportion of positive and negative results at p ≤ 0.05.

Table 3
IFA test and western blot for anti-Neospora caninum IgG antibodies in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.

Western blot analysis

The seropositivity for N. caninum IgG was confirmed by western blot (Table 3) analysis by testing all sera positive according the IFA test. The tested sera showed reactivity with a 29-kDa protein. Group I showed 82.6% IgG positivity (19/23); group II showed 85.7% IgG positivity (6/7); and group III showed 92.3% IgG positivity (12/13).

Discussion

In the present study, positivity for N. caninum was demonstrated by the IFA test and western blot analysis, which strengthens these findings because the methods are different but complementary serological techniques (Tranas et al., 1999Tranas J, Heinzen RA, Weiss LM, McAllister MM. Serological evidence of human infection with the protozoan Neospora caninum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6(5): 765-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999. PMid:10473533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-7...
).

For the IFA test, only 23.2% of the samples from group I were positive, indicating the low probability of cross-reactivity with T. gondii, whereas 76.8% were negative for N. caninum. In group III, of the 56 samples positive for anti-T. gondii IgG antibodies, 76.7% were negative for N. caninum. These findings corroborate the literature reporting minimal or no cross-reactivity, when dilutions equal to or greater than 1:50 are used in the IFA test (Lobato et al., 2006Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
; Tranas et al., 1999Tranas J, Heinzen RA, Weiss LM, McAllister MM. Serological evidence of human infection with the protozoan Neospora caninum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6(5): 765-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999. PMid:10473533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-7...
).

In groups II and III, 21.2% and 23.2% of the samples, respectively, were positive for N. caninum IgG antibodies. N. caninum can behave as an opportunistic pathogen in immunocompromised patients (Oshiro et al., 2015Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015. PMid:26516966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151...
; Lobato et al., 2006Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
), and some studies have reported similar rates in HIV-positive patients. In a study by Oshiro et al. (2015)Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015. PMid:26516966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151...
26.1% of samples from Mato Grosso do Sul and 31.2% for samples from the state of Paraná were positive, whereas in the state of Minas Gerais, Lobato et al. (2006)Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
found that 38% of samples from HIV-positive patients and 6% of samples from healthy individuals were positive, demonstrating that the positivity rate is lower in healthy individuals. The positivity rates may vary according to the technique used and the sample size.

Positivity for anti-N. caninum IgM was observed via IFA test, with 9 samples positive in group I and 2 samples positive in group III. In the literature, there are no data on anti-N. caninum IgM in humans, and the role of the humoral immune response has not yet been elucidated in individuals exposed to the parasite. However, the presence of specific IgM antibodies is indicative of recent infection. A study conducted in the laboratory with mice showed the production of N. caninum-specific IgM on the seventh day after challenge, followed by IgG production starting on the fourteenth day (Teixeira et al., 2005Teixeira L, Marques A, Meireles CS, Seabra AR, Rodrigues D, Madureira P, et al. Characterization of the B-cell immune response elicited in BALB/c mice challenged with Neospora caninum tachyzoites. Immunology 2005; 116(1): 38-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02195.x. PMid:16108816.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.20...
).

There was a significant association between age and N. caninum positive cases in group III, but there are no data in the literature relating positivity to age in humans. However, according to Dubey et al. (2012)Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012; 139(11): 1375-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765. PMid:22776427.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000...
, one of the main risk factors for T. gondii infection in Brazil is advanced age, as there is increased exposure to the parasite. The significant association between positivity for N. caninum and the proportion of pregnant women positive and negative for only IgG in each group is indicative of past infection.

Reactivity to the N. caninum surface antigen rNcSRS2 (Nc-p43) via western blot, 82.6% (19/23) for group I, 85.7% (6/7) for group II and 92.3% (12/13) for group III, demonstrates that these samples are truly positive because rNcSRS2 (Nc-p43) is highly immunogenic and well-conserved (Howe et al., 1998Howe DK, Crawford AC, Lindsay D, Sibley LD. The p29 and p35 immunodominant antigens of Neospora caninum tachyzoites are homologous to the family of surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun 1998; 66(11): 5322-5328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322-5328.1998. PMid:9784539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322...
).

Oshiro et al. (2016)Oshiro LM, Cunha RC, Duarte PO, Santos AG Jr, Sanches CC, Leite FPL, et al. The development of an indirect ELISA test using the recombinant protein NcSRS2 to detect anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in humans. Jacobs J Vet Sci Res 2016; 3(3): 1-5. used this same protein to develop an indirect serological test (ELISA) to detect anti-N. caninum antibodies in humans and showed sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90%. In a study carried out by Nam et al. (1998)Nam HW, Kang SW, Choi WY. Antibody reaction of human anti-Toxoplasma gondii positive and negative sera with Neospora caninum antigens. Korean J Parasitol 1998; 36(4): 269-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.1998.36.4.269. PMid:9868893.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.1998.36.4....
with human samples of negative and positive sera for T. gondii, the reactivity for a 43 KDa surface protein was observed in the western blot for N. caninum. Three samples showed reactivity, two from the positive group for T. gondii and one from the negative group. This protein seems to be the same used in the present study, however it is not clear in what conditions the western blot was performed and we must take into account that in the present study the recombinant partial sequence of the respective protein was used.

According to Howe & Sibley (1999)Howe DK, Sibley LD. Comparison of the major antigens of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii. Int J Parasitol 1999; 29(10): 1489-1496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00099-5. PMid:10608434.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)...
, the NcSRS2 protein (Nc-p43) has 35 KDa in non-denaturing conditions (without β-mercaptoethanol) and proteins with similar molecular weight have been reported by Lobato et al. (2006)Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
and Tranas et al. (1999)Tranas J, Heinzen RA, Weiss LM, McAllister MM. Serological evidence of human infection with the protozoan Neospora caninum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6(5): 765-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999. PMid:10473533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-7...
in human sera. Each host species is able to develop its own standard for anti-N. caninum antibodies and variations in the techniques used for the gel, electrophoresis, sample preparation, antigen sources and antibody detection can interfere with the molecular weight variation (Lobato et al., 2006Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
). Studies conducted by Hemphill et al. (1997)Hemphill A, Felleisen R, Connolly B, Gottstein B, Hentrich B, Müller N. Characterization of a cDNA-clone encoding Nc-p43, a major Neospora caninum tachyzoite surface protein. Parasitology 1997; 115(Pt 6): 581-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182097001650. PMid:9488869.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182097001...
and Howe et al. (1998)Howe DK, Crawford AC, Lindsay D, Sibley LD. The p29 and p35 immunodominant antigens of Neospora caninum tachyzoites are homologous to the family of surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun 1998; 66(11): 5322-5328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322-5328.1998. PMid:9784539.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322...
revealed that the partial nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding NcSRS2 (Nc-p43) has sequence homology with the SRS2 gene from T. gondii, but it was determined by immunotransfer that cross reactivity with T. gondii appears to be insignificant (Bjerkas et al., 1994Bjerkas I, Jenkins MC, Dubey JP. Identification and characterization of Neospora caninum tachyzoite antigens useful for diagnosis of neosporosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1994; 1(2): 214-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.1.2.214-221.1994. PMid:7496948.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.1.2.214-2...
; Paré et al., 1998Paré J, Fecteau G, Fortin M, Marsolais G. Seroepidemiologic study of Neospora caninum in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 213(11): 1595-1598. PMid:9838960.; Bae et al., 2000Bae JS, Kim DY, Hwang WS, Kim JH, Lee NS, Nam HW. Detection of IgG antibody against Neospora caninum in cattle in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2000; 38(4): 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2000.38.4.245. PMid:11138317.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2000.38.4....
).

Regional conditions must be taken into account so that there is a better understanding of the interaction between antigen and antibody for N. caninum (Lima et al., 2007Lima MSC Jr, Andreotti R, Caetano AR, Paiva F, Matos MFC. Cloning and expression of an antigenic domain of a major surface protein (Nc-p43) of Neospora caninum. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2007; 16(2): 61-66. PMid:17706005.). Although the rNcSRS2 protein (Nc-p43) did not cross-react with T. gondii in the serum of cattle, dogs and sheep (Borsuk et al., 2011Borsuk S, Andreotti R, Leite FP, Pinto LS, Simionatto S, Hartleben CP, et al. Development of an indirect ELISA-NcSRS2 for detection of Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle. Vet Parasitol 2011; 177(1-2): 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.026. PMid:21168278.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010....
; Pinheiro et al., 2015Pinheiro AF, Borsuk S, Berne MEA, Pinto LS, Andreotti R, Roos T, et al. Use of ELISA based on NcSRS2 of Neospora caninum expressed in Pichia pastoris for diagnosing neosporosis in sheep and dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(2): 148-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015015. PMid:26083692.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015...
), further studies are needed to assess the interaction of this antigen with antibodies, from human samples positive for T. gondii.

Neospora caninum is transmitted very efficiently by the transplacental route in cattle (Dubey, 2003Dubey JP. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J Parasitol 2003; 41(1): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1.1. PMid:12666725.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1....
), and neosporosis is an important cause of abortion in these animals (Barros et al., 2011Barros JC, Figueiredo LF No, Fagundes MBB, Andreotti R. Economic assesment of neosporosis in beef cattle system performance with different technological levels. Semina: Ciênc Agrár 2011;32(4 Suppl 1): 1943-1954. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1943.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011...
). According to data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE, 2018Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Efetivo do rebanho [online]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ms/pesquisa/18/16459?tipo=ranking&indicador=16533
https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ms/pe...
), Mato Grosso do Sul has the fourth largest cattle herd in Brazil. The seroprevalence for N. caninum in cattle in the state ranged from 14.9% to 43% (Ragozo et al., 2003Ragozo AMA, Paula VSO, Souza SLP, Bergamaschi DP, Gennari SM. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em soros bovinos procedentes de seis estados brasileiros. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(1): 33-37.; Andreotti et al., 2004Andreotti R, Pinckney RD, Pires PP, Silva EA. Evidence of Neospora caninum in beef cattle and dogs in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, center-western region, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(3): 129-131.; Oshiro et al., 2007Oshiro LM, Matos MF, de Oliveira JM, Monteiro LA, Andreotti R. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle from the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2007; 16(3): 133-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007000300004. PMid:18078599.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007...
). A study by Benetti et al. (2009)Benetti AH, Schein FB, dos Santos TR, Toniollo GH, da Costa AJ, Mineo JR, et al. Pesquisa de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em bovinos leiteiros, cães e trabalhadores rurais da região Sudoeste do Estado de Mato Grosso. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl 1): 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005. PMid:20040187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005...
found a seroprevalence of N. caninum of 10.5% in rural workers and 53.5% in cattle in the state of Mato Grosso. The possibility that N. caninum can infect humans should not be ruled out, as serological evidence in humans is well described in the literature, suggesting exposure to the parasite (Oshiro et al., 2015Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015. PMid:26516966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151...
; Ibrahim et al., 2009Ibrahim HM, Salem TA, Huang P, Nishikawa Y, Xuan X, Nasr MI, et al. Prevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in northern Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009; 80(2): 263-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.263. PMid:19190225.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80....
; Lobato et al., 2006Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
; Tranas et al., 1999Tranas J, Heinzen RA, Weiss LM, McAllister MM. Serological evidence of human infection with the protozoan Neospora caninum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6(5): 765-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999. PMid:10473533.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-7...
).

An in vitro study showed N. caninum is able to infect human cervical cells and trophoblasts (Carvalho et al., 2010Carvalho JV, Alves CM, Cardoso MR, Mota CM, Barbosa BF, Ferro EA, et al. Differential susceptibility of human trophoblastic (BeWo) and uterine cervical (HeLa) cells to Neospora caninum infection. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(14): 1629-1637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.010. PMid:20708622.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010....
). In experimental studies conducted with nonhuman primates, infection by N. caninum was similar to that induced by T. gondii, indicating susceptibility to transplacental infection and fetal lesions (Ho et al., 1997Ho MS, Barr BC, Tarantal AF, Lai LT, Hendrickx AG, Marsh AE, et al. Detection of Neospora from tissues of experimentally infected rhesus macaques by PCR and specific DNA probe hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35(7): 1740-1745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.35.7.1740-1745.1997. PMid:9196184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.35.7.1740-...
; Barr et al., 1994Barr BC, Conrad PA, Sverlow KW, Tarantal AF, Hendrickx AG. Experimental fetal and transplacental Neospora infection in the nonhuman primate. Lab Invest 1994; 71(2): 236-242. PMid:8078303.).

Although viable N. caninum parasites have not yet been reported in human tissues, DNA was detected for the first time in two umbilical cord blood samples in a study conducted by Duarte et al. (2020)Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1. PMid:32493968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-659...
in Brazil. In Spain, among 600 human samples analyzed, none showed positivity for N. caninum (Calero-Bernal et al., 2019Calero-Bernal R, Horcajo P, Hernández M, Ortega-Mora LM, Fuentes I. Absence of Neospora caninum DNA in Human Clinical Samples, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25(6): 1226-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2506.181431. PMid:31107232.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2506.181431...
). It is not clear whether N. caninum is capable of causing a disease similar to infection by T. gondii and further studies are needed to clarify this possibility.

The serological results of the present study suggest that exposure of these pregnant women to the N. caninum parasite and the presence of IgM antibodies are indicative of recent infection. The role of N. caninum in human pregnancies is not yet clear, but it is known that in mammals such as cattle, sheep and goats, can cause abortion and fetal resorption and mummification; thus, we cannot rule out the possibility that N. caninum is potentially harmful to human pregnancies. Further studies are needed to establish the possibility of active infection.

Acknowledgements

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior – Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001. This study was financed in part by the Fundação Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul – UFMS/MEC – Brazil. We thank IPED/ APAE for their collaboration.

  • How to cite: Duarte PO, Csordas BG, Oshiro LM, Higa LOS, Zimmermann NP, Martins KR, et al. Serological evaluation of Neospora caninum in pregnant women treated at referral center for prenatal screening in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2020; 29(4): e010820. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612020097

References

  • Andreotti R, Pinckney RD, Pires PP, Silva EA. Evidence of Neospora caninum in beef cattle and dogs in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, center-western region, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(3): 129-131.
  • Bae JS, Kim DY, Hwang WS, Kim JH, Lee NS, Nam HW. Detection of IgG antibody against Neospora caninum in cattle in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2000; 38(4): 245-249. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2000.38.4.245 PMid:11138317.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2000.38.4.245
  • Barr BC, Conrad PA, Sverlow KW, Tarantal AF, Hendrickx AG. Experimental fetal and transplacental Neospora infection in the nonhuman primate. Lab Invest 1994; 71(2): 236-242. PMid:8078303.
  • Barratt JLN, Harkness J, Marriott D, Ellis JT, Stark D. Importance of nonenteric protozoan infections in immunocompromised people. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23(4): 795-836. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00001-10 PMid:20930074.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00001-10
  • Barros JC, Figueiredo LF No, Fagundes MBB, Andreotti R. Economic assesment of neosporosis in beef cattle system performance with different technological levels. Semina: Ciênc Agrár 2011;32(4 Suppl 1): 1943-1954. http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1943
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2011v32n4Sup1p1943
  • Benetti AH, Schein FB, dos Santos TR, Toniollo GH, da Costa AJ, Mineo JR, et al. Pesquisa de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em bovinos leiteiros, cães e trabalhadores rurais da região Sudoeste do Estado de Mato Grosso. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl 1): 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005 PMid:20040187.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1005
  • Bjerkas I, Jenkins MC, Dubey JP. Identification and characterization of Neospora caninum tachyzoite antigens useful for diagnosis of neosporosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1994; 1(2): 214-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.1.2.214-221.1994 PMid:7496948.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.1.2.214-221.1994
  • Borsuk S, Andreotti R, Leite FP, Pinto LS, Simionatto S, Hartleben CP, et al. Development of an indirect ELISA-NcSRS2 for detection of Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle. Vet Parasitol 2011; 177(1-2): 33-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.026 PMid:21168278.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.11.026
  • Calero-Bernal R, Horcajo P, Hernández M, Ortega-Mora LM, Fuentes I. Absence of Neospora caninum DNA in Human Clinical Samples, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 2019; 25(6): 1226-1227. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2506.181431 PMid:31107232.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2506.181431
  • Carvalho JV, Alves CM, Cardoso MR, Mota CM, Barbosa BF, Ferro EA, et al. Differential susceptibility of human trophoblastic (BeWo) and uterine cervical (HeLa) cells to Neospora caninum infection. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(14): 1629-1637. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.010 PMid:20708622.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.06.010
  • Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1 PMid:32493968.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1
  • Dubey JP, Carpenter JL, Speer CA, Topper MJ, Uggla A. Newly recognized fatal protozoan disease of dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192(9): 1269-1285. PMid:3391851.
  • Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Rajendran C, Miska K, Ferreira LR, Martins J, et al. Gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a natural definitive host for Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 2011; 181(2-4): 382-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018 PMid:21640485.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018
  • Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012; 139(11): 1375-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765 PMid:22776427.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765
  • Dubey JP, Schares G, Ortega-Mora LM. Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20(2): 323-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-06 PMid:17428888.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00031-06
  • Dubey JP. Review of Neospora caninum and neosporosis in animals. Korean J Parasitol 2003; 41(1): 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1.1 PMid:12666725.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2003.41.1.1
  • Gondim LFP, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34(2): 159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001 PMid:15037103.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001
  • Hemphill A, Felleisen R, Connolly B, Gottstein B, Hentrich B, Müller N. Characterization of a cDNA-clone encoding Nc-p43, a major Neospora caninum tachyzoite surface protein. Parasitology 1997; 115(Pt 6): 581-590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182097001650 PMid:9488869.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182097001650
  • Hemphill A, Fuchs N, Sonda S, Hehl A. The antigenic composition of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1999; 29(8): 1175-1188. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00085-5 PMid:10576569.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00085-5
  • Ho MS, Barr BC, Tarantal AF, Lai LT, Hendrickx AG, Marsh AE, et al. Detection of Neospora from tissues of experimentally infected rhesus macaques by PCR and specific DNA probe hybridization. J Clin Microbiol 1997; 35(7): 1740-1745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.35.7.1740-1745.1997 PMid:9196184.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.35.7.1740-1745.1997
  • Howe DK, Crawford AC, Lindsay D, Sibley LD. The p29 and p35 immunodominant antigens of Neospora caninum tachyzoites are homologous to the family of surface antigens of Toxoplasma gondii. Infect Immun 1998; 66(11): 5322-5328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322-5328.1998 PMid:9784539.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/IAI.66.11.5322-5328.1998
  • Howe DK, Sibley LD. Comparison of the major antigens of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii. Int J Parasitol 1999; 29(10): 1489-1496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00099-5 PMid:10608434.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(99)00099-5
  • Ibrahim HM, Salem TA, Huang P, Nishikawa Y, Xuan X, Nasr MI, et al. Prevalence of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in northern Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2009; 80(2): 263-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.263 PMid:19190225.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.263
  • Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Efetivo do rebanho [online]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2018 [cited 2020 Feb 10]. Available from: https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ms/pesquisa/18/16459?tipo=ranking&indicador=16533
    » https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/brasil/ms/pesquisa/18/16459?tipo=ranking&indicador=16533
  • King JS, Slapeta J, Jenkins DJ, Al-Qassab SE, Ellis JT, Windsor PA. Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(8): 945-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008 PMid:20149793.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008
  • Lima MSC Jr, Andreotti R, Caetano AR, Paiva F, Matos MFC. Cloning and expression of an antigenic domain of a major surface protein (Nc-p43) of Neospora caninum. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2007; 16(2): 61-66. PMid:17706005.
  • Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Segundo GRS, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006 PMid:16426004.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006
  • McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM. Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28(9): 1473-1478. PMid:9770635.
  • Nam HW, Kang SW, Choi WY. Antibody reaction of human anti-Toxoplasma gondii positive and negative sera with Neospora caninum antigens. Korean J Parasitol 1998; 36(4): 269-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.1998.36.4.269 PMid:9868893.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.1998.36.4.269
  • Oshiro LM, Cunha RC, Duarte PO, Santos AG Jr, Sanches CC, Leite FPL, et al. The development of an indirect ELISA test using the recombinant protein NcSRS2 to detect anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in humans. Jacobs J Vet Sci Res 2016; 3(3): 1-5.
  • Oshiro LM, Matos MF, de Oliveira JM, Monteiro LA, Andreotti R. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in cattle from the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2007; 16(3): 133-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007000300004 PMid:18078599.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007000300004
  • Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015 PMid:26516966.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015
  • Paré J, Fecteau G, Fortin M, Marsolais G. Seroepidemiologic study of Neospora caninum in dairy herds. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1998; 213(11): 1595-1598. PMid:9838960.
  • Paré J, Hietala SK, Thurmond MC. Interpretation of an indirect fluorescent antibody test for diagnosis of Neospora sp. infection in cattle. J Vet Diagn Invest 1995; 7(2): 273-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104063879500700222 PMid:7619917.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104063879500700222
  • Pinheiro AF, Borsuk S, Berne MEA, Pinto LS, Andreotti R, Roos T, et al. Use of ELISA based on NcSRS2 of Neospora caninum expressed in Pichia pastoris for diagnosing neosporosis in sheep and dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(2): 148-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015015 PMid:26083692.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015015
  • Ragozo AMA, Paula VSO, Souza SLP, Bergamaschi DP, Gennari SM. Ocorrência de anticorpos anti-Neospora caninum em soros bovinos procedentes de seis estados brasileiros. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(1): 33-37.
  • Teixeira L, Marques A, Meireles CS, Seabra AR, Rodrigues D, Madureira P, et al. Characterization of the B-cell immune response elicited in BALB/c mice challenged with Neospora caninum tachyzoites. Immunology 2005; 116(1): 38-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02195.x PMid:16108816.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2567.2005.02195.x
  • Tranas J, Heinzen RA, Weiss LM, McAllister MM. Serological evidence of human infection with the protozoan Neospora caninum. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1999; 6(5): 765-767. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999 PMid:10473533.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.6.5.765-767.1999

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    20 Nov 2020
  • Date of issue
    2020

History

  • Received
    07 May 2020
  • Accepted
    25 Sept 2020
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária FCAV/UNESP - Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Zona Rural, , 14884-900 Jaboticabal - SP, Brasil, Fone: (16) 3209-7100 RAMAL 7934 - Jaboticabal - SP - Brazil
E-mail: cbpv_rbpv.fcav@unesp.br