Infestation of rabbits with just-molted adults of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus: biological parameters and efficiency

Infestação de coelhos com adultos recém-mudados do carrapato-do-boi Rhipicephalus microplus

Abstract

In this study, we report for the first time the successful infestation of rabbits with just-molted, unfed adults of Rhipicephalus microplus. Six New Zealand White rabbits were experimentally infested with 20 female and 20 male unfed adult ticks released into plastic chambers fixed on the shaved backs of each host. The attachment and feeding processes were successful. The biological characteristics of the ticks and the occurrence of adverse events in the tick-attachment area were studied. The average engorgement period was 10.7 days, and 33.3% of the engorged females completed the parasitic phase. The average weight of the recovered engorged females was 149.8 mg, with an average egg mass weight of 70.9 mg, a conversion efficiency index of 47.3%, and a hatching percentage of 88.31%. The adverse reactions found in the tick-attachment area were the usual inflammatory responses of the organism to infestation by these ectoparasites; however, it did not prevent the ticks from feeding and completing their life cycle. These data indicate that the infestation of rabbits with just-molted, unfed adult ticks could be a valuable, alternative animal model for rapid and economical evaluation of vaccine candidates and new molecules with acaricidal activity against Rhipicephalus microplus.

Keywords:
Alternative host; life cycle; experimental infestation; animal model; feeding chambers; ectoparasite

Resumo

Neste estudo, relata-se, pela primeira vez, o sucesso da infestação de coelhos por carrapatos adultos recém-mudados e não alimentados. Seis coelhos brancos da Nova Zelândia foram infestados artificialmente com 20 carrapatos adultos fêmeas e 20 machos adultos não alimentados no interior de câmaras de plástico fixadas no dorso de cada hospedeiro. Os processos de fixação e alimentação dos carrapatos foram bem sucedidos. Foram estudadas as características biológicas dos carrapatos e a ocorrência de eventos adversos na área de fixação do ectoparasito. O período médio de ingurgitamento foi de 10,7 dias, e 33,3% das fêmeas ingurgitadas completaram a fase parasitária. O peso médio das fêmeas ingurgitadas recuperadas foi de 149,8 mg, com peso médio da massa de ovos de 70,9 mg, índice de produção de ovos de 47,3% e porcentagem de incubação de 88,31%. Uma resposta inflamatória usual do organismo à infestação por esses ectoparasitas foi a única reação adversa encontrada na área de fixação dos carrapatos, o que não impediu que eles se alimentassem e completassem seu ciclo de vida. Esses dados apontam que a infestação de coelhos com carrapatos adultos recém-mudados e não alimentados pode ser um modelo animal alternativo e útil para a avaliação rápida e econômica de candidatos a vacinas e novas moléculas com atividade acaricida contra Rhipicephalus microplus.

Palavras-chave:
Hospedeiro alternativo; ciclo de vida; infestação experimental; modelo animal; câmaras de alimentação; ectoparasita

Introduction

Rhipicephalus microplus, the most important member of the Ixodidae family from an economic point of view, is infamous for causing huge losses in livestock operations through the direct and indirect effects of feeding on host blood (Wang et al., 2019). Tropical and subtropical regions are favorable for the life cycle of R. microplus (Antunes et al., 2014). It is endemic to India, Asia, Africa, and the Caribbean (Estrada-Peña et al., 2006). In Cuba, R. microplus represents 57% of the Ixodid population (Gaínza et al., 2014). Synthetic acaricides are the main treatment of ticks infestation in the livestock, however, due to the increasing influence of acaricide resistance in ticks, the implementation of alternative strategies such as vaccines is required (Abbas et al., 2014).

R. microplus prefers to feed off cattle, although other animals can serve as occasional hosts for this species (Szabó et al., 2003). Several studies describe the infestation of R. microplus and aspects of its biology in alternative host species such as buffalo (Benitez et al., 2012; Obregón et al., 2010), horse (Franque et al., 2009; Rodríguez et al., 2009), llama (Aguirre et al., 2000), goat (Daemon et al., 1998; Nyangiwe & Horak, 2007), deer (Barré et al., 2002), sheep (Ma et al., 2016), dog (Franque et al., 2007), and rabbit (Amaral et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2016; Silva et al., 1996). These alternative hosts are a valuable option to accelerate the identification of novel molecules for tick control and to evaluate the efficacy of novel vaccine candidates against cattle ticks. Small laboratory animals, such as rabbits, are less expensive than cattle, and their use as surrogate hosts for tick infestation would reduce the physical space required for maintaining R. microplus colonies, facilitate handling and lower the maintenance costs (Amaral et al., 2012; Bonnet & Liu, 2012). Finally, the use of cattle to evaluate experimental vaccines or drugs implies the risk of compromising the meat and milk of these animals with drug residues (Senbill et al., 2018).

The infestation of rabbits with R. microplus larvae (Amaral et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2016; Silva et al., 1996) has been proved to be a time-consuming and low-yield procedure, not optimal for the evaluation of vaccine candidates. Infestation with larvae induces strong cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions in the attachment area of the rabbit skin, and mortality rates are high, therefore, a low percentage of the larvae manage to reach the adult stage. In this study, a variation of this procedure is proposed by infecting rabbits with just-molted, unfed adults of R. microplus instead of larvae. The biological parameters and the efficiency of this model are evaluated.

Materials and Methods

The experiments were approved and conducted following the guidelines of the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation. All procedures and samplings involving animals were carried out following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (National Research Council, 2011) and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB) (approved protocol number SG2021-4).

Ticks

The R. microplus specimens used in this experiment were kindly provided by the National Laboratory of Parasitology (LNP). The Cayo Coco hemoparasite-free LNP reference strain was used (Guzmán et al., 2021). Ticks were collected from clinically healthy cattle, maintained in individual boxes. The ticks on the cattle were visualized with an Optivisor DA-7 blue optical glass binocular magnifier (Donovan Optical, Inc, USA), and removed with forceps after fifteen days of infection. Just-molted adult ticks of any size were selected based on the morphological changes in the epidermis. They were identified by the remnants of the old cuticle that are still attached to the new one.

Rabbits

Six 12-week-old, female, specific pathogen-free (SPF) New Zealand White rabbits in good health conditions, weighing 2.5 kg, and naïve to ticks, were purchased from the National Center for Laboratory Animals Production (CENPALAB) and kept in the open area of CIGB animal facilities. The rabbits were kept in independent boxes throughout the experiment and fed with pelleted feed (supplied by CENPALAB) and water ad libitum.

Containment devices and infestation

The containment devices were constructed using cell culture plastic bottles lined with fabric and having screwcaps. Small holes were introduced in the caps using needles for facilitating oxygenation (Neitz et al., 1971; Sanavria et al., 1996). These devices were fixed on the upper back of the rabbits with a non-toxic contact cement lacking toluene. The attachment area was previously shaved with an Electric 2000 Plus machine (Hauptner & Herberhotz GmbH & Co. KG, Germany). The shaved area was washed with 70% ethanol to remove cut hairs and sebaceous secretions that might interfere with the attachment of the devices. One device was attached to each rabbit. Twenty-four hours after attaching the devices, 20 male and 20 female just-molted, unfed adult ticks were introduced into each plastic chamber. From this moment, the animals were kept under daily observation. The engorged females detached were harvested and transferred to Petri dishes in the laboratory, where they proceeded with their non-parasitic cycle.

Non-parasitic stage

Engorged females were washed with distilled water and dried with filter paper. Subsequently, they were weighed individually and placed on Petri dishes (one tick per dish). The dishes were kept under controlled conditions of 28 ^°C temperature and 80% relative humidity with a photoperiod of 12:12 light/darkness until the end of the setting (Amaral et al., 2012). Egg masses were weighed individually and placed in glass flasks with cotton plugs (for ventilation) and kept under the same controlled conditions (humidity, temperature, and light) until hatching was completed.

The egg production index (EPI) was calculated using the formula (Bennett, 1974):

$$EPI=eggmassweight/engorgedfemalesweightx100$$ (1)

The hatching percentage was calculated by counting the larvae and the eggs under a stereomicroscope (S9-series, Leica, Germany). Three independent counts were done for each sample. A total of 300 specimens (either larvae or eggs) were counted for each replicate and added. The hatching percentage was determined by the formula:

$$Hatchingpercentage=Numberoflarvae/\left(Numberoflarvae+Numberofeggs\right)x100.$$ (2)

Histopathology of the tick attachment area

Five skin samples were collected from each rabbit after tick attachment, according to the protocol by (Szabó & Bechara, 1999). The samples were only taken from regions with partially engorged ticks and were immediately immersed in a 10% neutral buffered formalin solution for fixation. These tissues were dehydrated by immersion in increasing concentrations of ethanol, (80%, 90% and 100%) for 1 hour each. Thereafter, they were treated with xylene for 1 hour for cleaning. The tissues were removed from the cleaning agent and embedded and blocked in paraffin wax. Each sample was cut in 3-4 µm thick sections, as close as possible to the tick hypostome, using a semi-automatic vertical microtome. The sections were mounted on microscopic slides, rehydrated, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. After fixation and staining of skin tissues the samples were embedded in Canada balsam, visualized in a DM300 transmission microscope (Leica, Germany), and photo-documented with a cyber-shot DSC-530 camera (Sony, Japan).

Statistical methods

The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the reproductive parameters of the ticks collected from different groups. the differences between the individual means were determined by Dunn’s multiple comparison tests. a chi-square test was used to compare the number of engorged females recovered from each rabbit. The statistical analysis was carried out using the Graph Pad Prism software, version 6.0 (Graphpad Software; La Jolla, USA).

Results

Collection and selection of ticks from cattle

Three hundred ticks attached to the epidermis were collected from cattle and sexed. Only seven of them (2.3%) had lesions in the hypostome after removal. A total of 120 females and 120 males with an intact hypostome were selected for the experiment in rabbits

General biological parameters

After 24 hours, approximately 70% of the ticks were viable and moved inside the devices in search of the best place to attach and feed. After 48 hours, a large number of ticks had already attached and were feeding.

The general biological parameters of the ticks are summarized in Table 1. The engorging period ranged from 7 to 16 days, with an average engorging period of 10.7 ± 3.5 days. The feeding process was affected by the strong hypersensitivity reactions observed in the tick-attachment area on the rabbit’s skin. After the engorged females were detached, the area was reddened and inflamed. However, 33.3% of the engorged females could be recovered alive after engorgement. The engorged females weighed between 72 mg and 362 mg, with an average weight of 149.8 ± 85.8 mg, while the average weight of the egg masses was 70.9 ± 46.4 mg, and the average CEI was 47.3%. Additionally, the overall hatching percentage was 88.31%.

Table 1
General biological parameters of R. microplus individuals fed on rabbits.

Parameters	Mean ± STD	GM	Median	Range
Engorgement period (days)	10.7 ± 3.5	10.2	9	(7 - 16)
Recovery (%)	33.3
Weight of engorged females (mg)	149.8 ± 85.8	131.8	106.6	(72 - 362)
Weight of egg mass (mg)	70.9 ± 46.4	60.0	51.35	(0 - 179)
CEI (%)	47.3			(0 - 52.3)
Hatching (%)	88.3			(0 - 99.4)

• GM= geometric mean.

Biological parameters of ticks by engorgement day

The biological parameters of ticks per engorgement day are presented in Table 2. The collection of detached, engorged females started on day 7, and this was the day of maximal collection, reaching up to seven engorged females per rabbit. The weight of the engorged females decreased as the number of engorgement days increased. The differences in the weight of engorged females shed on day 7 and days 9, 13, and 16 were statistically significant (Figure 1A) (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.05, Dunn p < 0.05).

Table 2
Recovery of R. microplus per engorgement day on rabbits.

Parameters
Engorgement period (days)	7	8	9	13	14	15	16
Number of engorged females	10	7	5	5	4	5	4
Recovery (%)	8.3	5.8	4.3	4.3	3.3	4.2	3.3

Figure 1
Biological parameters of just-molted Rhipicephalus microplus adults engorged on rabbits. A: average weight of engorged females per engorgement day; B: average weight of eggs masses per engorgement day; C: Egg production index per engorgement day; D: hatching percentage per engorgement day. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among groups (Dunn test, p < 0.05).

Unlike the engorged females collected between days 7 and 13, which were green in color, the engorged females collected on days 14, 15, and 16 presented a yellow coloration and laid fewer eggs. The differences in the weight of eggs laid between days 7 and 16 were statistically significant (Figure 1B) (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.05, Dunn p < 0.05). No differences were found in the egg production index of the engorged females collected on different engorgement days (Figure 1C) (Kruskal-Wallis p > 0.05), since the weight of both, the engorged females and their eggs, decreased with the increase in engorgement time.

The hatching percentage also decreased as the number of engorgement days increased. Significant differences were found in the hatching percentage between days 7 and 14 (Figure 1D) (Kruskal-Wallis p < 0.05, Dunn p < 0.05).

Biological parameters of ticks per rabbit

About six to nine engorged females were recovered per rabbit (Table 3). No significant differences were observed among the rabbits for this parameter (Chi-square, p = 0.1860). On day 7, two ticks were removed from rabbit # 5 and three from rabbit # 6, and the corresponding attachment area of the rabbit epidermis was sampled to conduct a histopathological analysis.

Table 3
Engorged females recovery per rabbit and engorgement day.

Animal	Engorgement days							Total	Recovery (%)
	7	8	9	13	14	15	16
1	0	3	2	0	1	3	0	9	45
2	1	0	0	0	2	1	3	7	35
3	4	0	2	3	0	0	0	9	45
4	1	1	1	2	1	1	1	8	40
5	1	0	1	0	2	0	0	6*	30
6	1	1	0	0	0	1	0	6**	30
Total	8	5	6	5	6	6	4	40	33.3
X	1.33	0.83	1	0.83	1	1	0.66	6.6

• X, mean of engorged females recovered per rabbit. The recovery was calculated as the percentage of planted adult females that were recovered at the end of the engorgement period.
• ^*
  2 engorged females were removed for histopathology on day 7; hence it could not be assigned to any engorgement day;
• ^**
  3 engorged females were removed for histopathology on day 7; hence it could not be assigned to any engorgement day.

Adverse reactions in the tick-attachment area on the rabbits’ skin

A biopsy of the tick-attachment area on the rabbit skin showed epidermal hyperplasia. Several tick-related structures could be observed, such as the cement cone (generated by the tick during the attachment process), the capitulum, which includes the mouthparts used for attachment, and the alimentary cavity (Figure 2A). The host’s response to tick infestation was characterized by an inflammatory reaction with abundant eosinophils and macrophages (Figure 2B). However, this reaction did not prevent the ticks from engorging and having viable offspring.

Figure 2
Histopathology of the infected rabbits’ skin. A: R. microplus attachment site on the rabbit skin stained with hematoxylin-eosin. The arrow indicates inflammatory cell infiltration. HE: epidermal hyperplasia; CA: alimentary cavity; CC: cement cone; C: capitulum; ellipse: inflammatory response in the tick attachment area. B: local inflammatory response in the tick attachment area. Eosinophils (White Arrows) and Macrophages (Black Arrows).

Discussion

Studies have been conducted to analyze the attachment and feeding of R. microplus on alternative hosts such as horses (Franque et al., 2009), sheep (Ma et al., 2016), goats (Daemon et al., 1998; Nyangiwe & Horak, 2007), rabbits (Amaral et al., 2012; Silva et al., 1996) and dogs (Franque et al., 2007). All these species allowed the development of the parasitic cycle of these Ixodids to a certain degree, although the results were variable and depended on the host-parasite relationship. In these studies, the infestation was initiated using the R. microplus larvae, which seemed to be quite susceptible to the immune-inflammatory responses of these non-conventional hosts. A different approach was explored in the present study by infecting rabbits with just-molted unfed adults instead of the larvae. The unfed adults managed to attach, engorge, complete their parasitic cycle, and spontaneously detach from their host.

The overall recovery of engorged females in our experiment was 33.3%. The information on the recovery in other hosts has been variable, both in free and controlled infestations, but the general recovery has always been lower. For example, a recovery of 3.7% was reported in goats (Daemon et al., 1998); between 0.9% and 1.8% in horses (Franque et al., 2009); 0.42% in dogs (Franque et al., 2007); and 10.69% and 4.88% in rabbits infested on the ears and the back, respectively (Amaral et al., 2012). Another study carried out on bovine, sheep and rabbits, yielded recoveries of 11%, 0.47%, and 5.5%, respectively (Ma et al., 2016). It has been reported that the recovery of engorged females could be influenced by two factors: (1) the intraspecific competition between ticks for physical space, which leads to ticks maintaining a restricted area for their feeding (Silva et al., 1996), and (2) by the immune-inflammatory reaction of the host, which interferes with the blood supply to the host tissues, thereby limiting the tick’s ability to acquire food (Nuttall & Labuda, 2004; Valenzuela, 2004; Cunha, 1978).

In controlled studies in bovines using containment devices with 3000 R. microplus larvae, the recovery of engorged females was variable and depended on the strain used, with values that fluctuated between 10% and 25%. For example, 24.03% was reported for the Camcord strain (Cuba) (Garcia-Garcia et al., 2000); 15.03% for strain A (Argentina) (Garcia-Garcia et al., 2000); 13.6% for Yerongpilly strain (Australia) (Penichet et al., 1994) and 21.3% with the Cayo Coco strain (Cuba) (Mallón et al., 2020). The recovery of engorged females in our model (33.3%) was even higher than those reported in cattle. The more logical explanation for this is that cattle are infested with larvae, therefore the ticks would have to go through three stages of development (larva, nymph, and adult), a fact that reduces the percentage of recovery, while in our model rabbits are infected with adults, which are already in the final stage of development, facilitating a higher percentage of recovery. In addition, it must be considered that the initial number of ticks used in our model to infect rabbits was low, and in cattle, the percent of recovery tend to be higher when lower number of larvae is used.

Another important parameter to be considered in these surrogate models is the duration of the engorgement period. In this study, the engorgement and copulation period of the ticks in rabbits was 10.7 days. These values are higher than those previously reported in rabbits infected with larvae: 7.03 ± 2.45 days for the dorsal region and 8.55 days for the pinna of the ears (Amaral et al., 2012). One reason that can be advanced to explain these differences is that in our model, the adult ticks initially spent some days attaching to the rabbit before beginning the engorgement phase. On the contrary, in the larvae infestation model, this is a continuous process, since nymphs are already attached, and the engorgement period begins immediately after molting.

On the other hand, the duration of the engorgement period of adult ticks in cattle was approximately eight days (Hitchcock, 1955). In a review article about the biological and ecological aspects of hard ticks, the proposed engorgement period ranked from 7 to 12 days (Echeverry & Osorio, 2016), which is very similar to the one found in the present study in rabbits.

It has been described that long engorgement periods alter the morphology of engorged females and reduce egg production (Wikel & Bergman, 1997). In this study, a yellow coloration was observed in the engorged females when the engorgement period was longer than nine days. A similar change in coloration was reported in ticks fed on the pinna of the ear in rabbits (Silva et al., 1996), contrasting with the reddish color of R. microplus (Garcia et al., 2019) or from chestnut to dark brown color characteristic to all Rhipicephalus species (Onofrio et al., 2006).

The weight of the engorged ticks is directly related to certain features of their parasitic phase. The increase in intraspecific competition can cause a decrease in the weight of the engorged female, and consequently, lower its efficiency to convert ingested food into egg mass, since the ability to produce eggs is directly related to the availability of food (Bennett, 1974). Additionally, long engorgement periods of ticks in horses were not accompanied by an increase in the engorgement of engorged females (Franque et al., 2009). Our results agreed with the previous reports, as the average weight of engorged females decreased with the number of engorgement days.

The mean weight of the engorged females in our study (149.8 mg) was higher than the ones described before in rabbits infected with larvae in the back and ear, with values of 34.43 mg and 36.30 mg, respectively (Amaral et al., 2012). A lower average weight of 38.88 mg was also described for ticks planted on the ears of rabbits (Silva et al., 1996). This lower engorgement capacity may be associated with the cumulative effects of using a non-ideal food substrate during the larval stage (Franque et al., 2009).

The weight of R. microplus engorged females engorged on cattle is variable. Average weights of 213 mg and 246 mg were reported in studies carried out in Australia (Hitchcock, 1955; Sutherst et al., 1973). A value of 245.5 mg was reported in Colombia (Ortíz, 1983) and 228 mg in Cuba (Vega et al., 2003). A direct comparison between the weight of engorged females from Brazil and Cuba showed comparable results of 258.7 mg and 233.9 mg (Vega et al., 2007). In summary, the average weight of the engorged females in our study was closer to the values reported for cattle than to the previous experiments of rabbit infestation with R. microplus larvae.

The egg production index was 47.3%, and this index was conserved throughout the entire engorging period, which indicates that the capacity for processing blood and converting it into eggs was similar for all engorged females, regardless of their weight.

On the other hand, the hatching percentage showed significant differences between days 7 and 14, with values of 96.85% and 90.13%, respectively, and average hatching of 88.31%. This hatching percentage was lower than that obtained by (Silva et al., 1996), who reported a very high hatching percentage of 96.65%. This lower value may be related to the characteristics of the strains used in both studies.

The skin lesion produced by ticks at the point of attachment, regardless of the host or the parasite species, is characterized by epidermal hyperplasia, formation of the cement cone, presence of the tick mouthparts and alimentary cavity, and a strong immune-inflammatory reaction of the host during the tick feeding process (Bechara, 2006; Engracia et al., 2017; Szabó & Bechara, 1999; Tabor et al., 2017; van der Heijden et al., 2005). All these elements were observed in this study.

In rabbits, infestation with R. microplus induces the production of an inflammatory cell infiltrate (with eosinophils and small macrophages) at the attachment site. The composition of the infiltrate varies depending on the relationship of the tick with its host, time, and the number of infestations (Bechara, 2006). Eosinophils have been associated with the introduction of tick saliva into the skin of a desensitized host, which causes degranulation of mast cells and basophils. This reaction possibly occurs due to enzymatic hydrolysis of the host’s plasma membrane by salivary enzymes, resulting in the release of vasoactive and chemotactic factors that could contribute to the leukocyte influxes at the tick attachment sites (Tabor et al., 2017).

R. microplus is considered a very complex species that has coevolved with its host, acquiring a high degree of specificity. Therefore, from the biological point of view, using its natural host for experimental work is highly advantageous; however, it is limited by the high costs associated with the acquisition and maintenance of animals, specialized labor, and its management. In contrast, the rabbit is a very economical and practical model for tick engorgement that allows the engorgement of all stages of different tick species, making it a valuable tool for expanding investigations in search of molecules for the control of ticks.

The data generated in this study allow us to conclude that the infestation of rabbits with just-molted, unfed adults of R. microplus can provide some advantages over previous studies using larvae. The extended engorgement period, the higher recovery values, and the weight of the engorged females observed in this study suggest that rabbits could be a useful alternative biological model to evaluate new molecules and vaccines for the control of this ectoparasite.

• How to cite: Vargas-Hernandez M, Montero-Espinosa C, Sánchez-Villaurrutia D, Duarte CA, Bechara GH, Fuentes-Castillo A, et al. Infestation of rabbits with just-molted adults of the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus: biological parameters and efficiency. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2023; 32(1): e016122. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023006

References

• Abbas RZ, Zaman MA, Colwell DD, Gilleard J, Iqbal Z. Acaricide resistance in cattle ticks and approaches to its management: the state of play. Vet Parasitol 2014; 203(1-2): 6-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.006 PMid:24709006.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.03.006
• Aguirre DH, Cafrune MM, Guglielmone AA. Experimental infestation of llamas (Lama glama) with Boophilus microplus (Acari: ixodidae). Exp Appl Acarol 2000; 24(8): 661-664. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026563026922 PMid:11201357.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026563026922
• Amaral MAZ, Prata MA, Daemon E, Furlong J. Biological parameters of cattle ticks fed on rabbits. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2012; 21(1): 22-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000100005 PMid:22534940.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000100005
• Antunes S, Merino O, Mosqueda J, Moreno-Cid JA, Bell-Sakyi L, Fragkoudis R, et al. Tick capillary feeding for the study of proteins involved in tick-pathogen interactions as potential antigens for the control of tick infestation and pathogen infection. Parasit Vectors 2014; 7(1): 42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-42 PMid:24450836.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-42
• Barré N, Bianchi M, Garine‐Wichatitsky M. Effect of the association of cattle and rusa deer (Cervus timorensis russa) on populations of cattle ticks (Boophilus microplus). Ann N Y Acad Sci 2002; 969(1): 280-289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04393.x PMid:12381606.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04393.x
• Bechara G. Imunopatologia da interação carrapato-hospedeiro. In: Barros-Battesti D, Arzua M, Bechara GH, editors. Carrapatos de importancia médico-veterinária da região neotropical. Um guia ilustrado para identificação de espécies São Paulo: Instituto Butantan; Utrecht: ICTTD-3; 2006. p. 139-144.
• Benitez D, Cetrá B, Florin-Christensen M. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus ticks can complete their life cycle on the water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). J Buffalo Sci 2012; 1(2): 193-197.
• Bennett GF. Oviposition of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (Acarida: Ixodidae). I. Influence of tick size on egg production. Acarologia 1974; 16(1): 52-61. PMid:4463680.
• Bonnet S, Liu X. Laboratory artificial infection of hard ticks: a tool for the analysis of tick-borne pathogen transmission. Acarologia 2012; 52(4): 453-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20122068
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/acarologia/20122068
• Cunha DW. Estudos da toxicidade de alguns carrapatos comumente encontrados no Brasil (Acarina: Ixodidae) [thesis]. Seropédica: Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro; 1978.
• Daemon E, Prata MCA, Faccini JLH. Goats as alternative hosts of Boophilus microplus (Acari: ixodidae). Braz J Vet Parasitol 1998; 7(2): 123-128.
• Echeverry DNP, Osorio LAR. Aspectos biológicos y ecológicos de las garrapatas duras. Cienc Tecnol Agropecuaria 2016; 17(1): 81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol17_num1_art:463
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol17_num1_art:463
• Engracia JR Fo, Araújo CD, Pinto GN, Mendes YH, Bechara GH. Cellular response in the tick feeding site in crossbred cattle artificially infested by Rhipicephalus microplus. Exp Appl Acarol 2017; 72(2): 171-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-017-0143-9 PMid:28597313.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-017-0143-9
• Estrada-Peña A, García Z, Sánchez HF. The distribution and ecological preferences of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Mexico. Exp Appl Acarol 2006; 38(4): 307-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-7251-2 PMid:16612672.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-006-7251-2
• Franque MP, Santos HA, Linarez FFM, Massard CL. Infestação experimental de equinos por Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus. Cienc Rural 2009; 39(7): 2117-2122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000700025
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782009000700025
• Franque MP, Santos HA, Silva GVO, Tajiri JT, Massard CL. Biological characteristics of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) on dog under experimental infestation. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2007; 16(4): 238-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007000400011 PMid:18373903.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612007000400011
• Gaínza YA, Martínez-Marrero S, Corona-González B. Ticks of veterinary interest in Cuba, and its importance in the changing climatic conditions. Rev Electrón Vet 2014; 15(2): 1-22.
• Garcia MV, Rodrigues VS, Koller WW, Andreotti R. Biologia e importância do carrapato Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus In: Andreotti R, Garcia MV, Koller WW, editrors. Carrapatos na cadeia produtiva de bovinos Brasília: Embrapa; 2019. p. 16-25.
• García-García JC, Montero C, Redondo M, Vargas M, Canales M, Boue O, et al. Control of ticks resistant to immunization with Bm86 in cattle vaccinated with the recombinant antigen Bm95 isolated from the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus. Vaccine 2000; 18(21): 2275-2287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00548-4 PMid:10717348.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0264-410X(99)00548-4
• Guzmán PEE, Cuétara CF, Argüelles ALC, Castillo AF, Martínez YG, Fernández RR, et al. Characterization of two Cuban colonies of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2021; 25: 100591. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100591 PMid:34474784.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2021.100591
• Hitchcock LF. Studies on the non-parasitic stages of the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) (AcarinaL Ixodidae). Aust J Zool 1955; 3(3): 295-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ZO9550295
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ZO9550295
• Ma M, Chen Z, Liu A, Ren Q, Liu J, Liu Z, et al. Biological parameters of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) fed on rabbits, sheep, and cattle. Korean J Parasitol 2016; 54(3): 301-305. http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2016.54.3.301 PMid:27417084.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2016.54.3.301
• Mallón AR, González LJ, Guzmán PEE, Bechara GH, Sanches GS, Pousa S, et al. Functional and mass spectrometric evaluation of an anti-tick antigen based on the P0 peptide conjugated to Bm86 protein. Pathogens 2020; 9(6): 513. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9060513 PMid:32630414.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9060513
• National Research Council. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals 8th ed. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2011.
• Neitz WO, Boughton F, Walters HS. Laboratory investigations on the life-cycle of the Karoo paralysis tick (Ixodes rubicundus Neumann, 1904). Onderstepoort J Vet Res 1971; 38(3): 215-223. PMid:5164824.
• Nuttall PA, Labuda M. Tick-host interactions: saliva-activated transmission. Parasitology 2004;129(Suppl 1): S177-S189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005633 PMid:15938511.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005633
• Nyangiwe N, Horak IG. Goats as alternative hosts of cattle ticks. Onderstepoort J Vet Res 2007; 74(1): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v74i1.133 PMid:17708147.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/ojvr.v74i1.133
• Obregón D, Diego JR, Roque E, Alemán Y. Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) en búfalo (Bubalus bubalis), en Cuba. Rev Salud Anim 2010; 32(2): 132-134.
• Onofrio V, Labruna M, Pinter A, Giacomin FG, Barros-Battesti D. Comentários e chaves para as espécies do gênero Amblyomma In: Barros-Battesti D, Arzua M, Bechara GH, editors. Carrapatos de importancia médico-veterinária da região neotropical. Um guia ilustrado para identificação de espécies São Paulo: Instituto Butantan; Utrecht: ICTTD-3; 2006. p. 53-113.
• Ortíz EB. Biología oviposicional de la garrapata Boophilus microplus en condiciones de los Llanos Orientales de Colombia. Rev ICA 1983; 18: 513-514.
• Penichet M, Rodríguez M, Castellano O, Mandado S, Rojas Y, Rubiera R, et al. Detection of Bm86 antigen in different strains of Boophilus microplus and effectiveness of immunization with recombinant Bm86. Parasite Immunol 1994; 16(9): 493-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00377.x PMid:7838598.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1994.tb00377.x
• Rodríguez I, Gern L, Rais O, Fuentes O, González R, Fernández C. Detección molecular de patógenos emergentes de importancia médica y veterinaria en garrapatas capturadas sobre caballos domésticos. Rev Cuba Med Trop 2009; 61(1): 57-62.
• Sanavria A, Prata M, Morais M, Alonso L. Determinação de alguns parâmetros biológicos de Amblyomma cajennense (Fabricius, 1787)(Acari: Ixodidae) em infestação artificial de equinos. Arq Fac Vet UFRGS 1996; 24: 79-86.
• Senbill H, Hazarika LK, Baruah A, Borah DK, Bhattacharyya B, Rahman S. Life cycle of the southern cattle tick, Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Canestrini 1888 (Acari: Ixodidae) under laboratory conditions. Syst Appl Acarol 2018; 23(6): 1169-1179. http://dx.doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.6.12
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.11158/saa.23.6.12
• Silva CLG, Cunha DW, Daemon E, Faccini JLH. Efeito do número de larvas de Boophilus microplus (Can., 1887) (Acari: lxodidae) sobre a recuperação de fêmeas ingurgitadas em coelhos. Rev Bras Ciênc Vet 1996; 3(2): 59-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbcv.2015.046
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbcv.2015.046
• Sutherst RW, Utech KBW, Dallwitz MJ, Kerr JD. Intra-specific competition of Boophilus microplus (Canestrini) on cattle. J Appl Ecol 1973; 10(3): 855-862. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2401874
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2401874
• Szabó MP, Bechara GH. Sequential histopathology at the Rhipicephalus sanguineus tick feeding site on dogs and guinea pigs. Exp Appl Acarol 1999; 23(11): 915-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006347200373 PMid:10668866.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006347200373
• Szabó MP, Labruna MB, Pereira MC, Duarte JMB. Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on wild marsh-deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from Southeast Brazil: infestations before and after habitat loss. J Med Entomol 2003; 40(3): 268-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-40.3.268 PMid:12943103.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-40.3.268
• Tabor AE, Ali A, Rehman G, Garcia GR, Zangirolamo AF, Malardo T, et al. Cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus-host interface: a review of resistant and susceptible host responses. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2017; 7: 506. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00506 PMid:29322033.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2017.00506
• Valenzuela JG. Exploring tick saliva: from biochemistry to ‘sialomes’ and functional genomics. Parasitology 2004;129(Suppl 1): S83-S94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005189 PMid:15938506.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182004005189
• van der Heijden KM, Szabó MPJ, Egami MI, Pereira MC, Matushima ER. Histopathology of tick-bite lesions in naturally infested capybaras (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris) in Brazil. Exp Appl Acarol 2005; 37(3-4): 245-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-4155-5 PMid:16323054.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10493-005-4155-5
• Vega R, Camejo A, Dias G. Dynamics of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) female feeding on bovine. Rev Salud Anim 2003; 25: 192-195.
• Vega R, Díaz G, Camejo A, Fonseca A, Passos RC. Weight differences between Boophilus microplus (Ixodoidea: Ixodidae) from Brazil and from Cuba. Rev Salud Anim 2007; 29: 36-38.
• Wang H-H, Teel PD, Grant WE, Soltero F, Urdaz J, Ramírez AEP, et al. Simulation tools for assessment of tick suppression treatments of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus on non-lactating dairy cattle in Puerto Rico. Parasit Vectors 2019; 12(1): 185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3443-6 PMid:31029149.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3443-6
• Wikel SK, Bergman D. Tick-host immunology: significant advances and challenging opportunities. Parasitol Today 1997; 13(10): 383-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01126-5 PMid:15275151.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-4758(97)01126-5

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  30 Jan 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  04 Nov 2022
• Accepted
  29 Nov 2022