Gastrointestinal parasites of wild carnivores from conservation institutions in the Cerrado of Goiás, Brazil

Parasitas gastrintestinais de carnívoros silvestres de instituições de conservação no Cerrado de Goiás, Brasil

Abstract

Increased interaction between wild and urban environments owing to human population growth, increased anthropization of biomes, and habitat loss for wild animals increases the spread of infectious and parasitic agents. The present study reports on the occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites in carnivorous mammals at two conservation institutions in the state of Goiás, Brazil. Fecal samples from 39 adult carnivores were collected after spontaneous defecation and analyzed by flotation and sedimentation. The structure and management data of each institution were recorded. Parasitism prevalence, binomial confidence intervals (CI) at 95%, variables associated with the presence of contact animals, size of the enclosure and type of food were recorded. The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in the samples analyzed was 71.8% (CI 55.1–83.0; 28/39). Ancylostomatidae, Toxocara spp., Toxascaris leonina, Strongyloides spp., Calodium hepaticum, and Trematoda eggs, and Cystoisospora spp. oocysts were detected. Environmental conditions were not correlated with parasitism prevalence; however, the parasites found could be managed, considering their biology, such as controlling synanthropic and domestic animals in captivity, feeding with healthy feed.

Keywords:
Ancylostomatidae; Carnivora; conservationism; coproparasitological test; zoonosis

Resumo

A crescente urbanização e a perda de hábitat para animais selvagens tem levado a uma maior interação entre ambientes selvagens e humanos, o que pode favorecer a disseminação de agentes infecciosos e parasitários. O presente estudo relata a ocorrência de parasitas gastrointestinais em mamíferos carnívoros em duas instituições de conservação no estado de Goiás, Brasil. Amostras fecais de 39 carnívoros adultos foram coletadas após a defecação espontânea e analisadas por flotação e sedimentação. Foram registrados os dados de estrutura e gestão de cada instituição. Prevalência de parasitismo, intervalo de confiança binomial (IC) a 95% e variáveis associadas a presença de animais de contato, tamanho do recinto e tipo de alimento foram registrados. A prevalência geral de parasitas gastrointestinais nas amostras analisadas foi de 71,8% (IC 55,1–83,0; 28/39). Foram detectados ovos de Ancylostomatidae, Toxocara spp., Toxascaris leonina, Strongyloides spp., Calodium hepaticum e de Trematoda e oocistos de Cystoisospora spp.. As condições ambientais não apresentaram correlação com a prevalência de parasitismo; entretanto, os parasitos encontrados podem ser manejados, considerando-se sua biologia, como controlar animais sinantrópicos e domésticos em cativeiro, e uso de alimentos livres de contaminantes.

Palavras-chave:
Ancylostomatidae; Carnivora; conservacionismo; teste coproparasitológico; zoonose

Medium-sized and large mammals perform various ecological functions, such as regulating the population of other animals in the food chain, dispersing seeds, and acting as ecosystem engineers. Among these, species of the order Carnivora that are at the top of the food chain can be indicators of good environmental quality as they regulate the functioning of ecosystems. Changes in the diversity and population of species of the order Carnivora can damage the trophic chain through competition and predation by other species (Oliveira et al., 2001).

The expansion of urban areas increases anthropization of biomes, increase in deforestation, the growth of urban areas, and animal production decrease the habitat of several species and promotes the occurrence of different diseases, particularly parasitic diseases (Sprenger et al., 2018). Several groups of pathogens with zoonotic potential affect wild carnivores (viruses, bacteria, protozoa, arthropods and helminths), and according to Otranto & Deplazes (2019), the risk of transmission of these pathogens to humans, especially helminths such as Ancylostoma, Baylisascaris, Capillaria, Uncinaria, Strongyloides, Toxocara and Trichinella that occur in wild carnivores and can be transmitted to humans via food, water or soil, has been neglected.

The Cerrado savanna is one of the richest biodiversity biomes worldwide and the second largest biome in Brazil. However, fragmentation owing to mechanized agriculture and the establishment of paddocks for livestock is affecting the Cerrado biome (Calaça et al., 2010). According to the Chico Mendes Institute of Biodiversity Conservation (Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, 2018), habitat loss is the major threat to Brazilian wildlife, followed by poaching.

The objective of the present study was to determine the gastrointestinal parasites in carnivorous mammals, from two conservation institutions in the state of Goiás, Brazil, through coproparasitological examinations.

Fecal samples of captive carnivore mammals were collected from the Goiânia Zoological Park (GZP), and from Instituto Onça Pintada (IOP), Goiânia and Mineiros respectively, Goiás, Brazil. The mean annual temperature varies between and 22.3-26.3°C and 19.3-24.7°C, whilst mean humidity of 40.8-72.6% and 49.7-78.4% are recorded for Goiania and Mineiros, respectively (Brasil, 2020).

The samples were collected directly from animal’s enclosure without handling the animals, along with enclosure maintenance and animal care procedures. Samples were collected in the morning immediately after defecation. During collection days, maintenance of the captivity was carried out when defecation was verified, to guarantee the non-development of larvae in the eggs; at each collection, we observed defecation and performed the collection, ensuring the sample from each animal with a minimum of handling. Thirty-nine adult carnivores of different species were sampled, as shown in Table 1, corresponding to 100% of animals available at the two institutions for the present study. The samples were placed in fecal collection pots, labeled, and refrigerated at 4 °C. Furthermore, data on the structure of the enclosure and management strategies adopted by each institution were recorded.

Table 1
Carnivores sampled for coproparasitological examination to identify gastrointestinal parasites from two conservation institutions in Goiás, Brazil.

Species	IOP *	GZP **	Total
	(n=21)	(n=18)	(n=39)
Felidae
Panthera tigris	0	4	4
Panthera leo	0	2	2
Panthera onca	16	5	21
Puma concolor	1	1	2
Leopardus pardalis	0	4	4
Herpailurus yagouaroundi	0	1	1
Canidae
Chrysocyon brachyurus	3	0	3
Cerdocyon thous	0	1	1
Procyonidae________________
Potos flavus	1	0	1

• ^*
  Instituto Onça Pintada;
• ^**
  Goiânia Zoological Park.

Fecal samples were analyzed using the coproparasitological techniques of flotation and spontaneous sedimentation adapted by Hoffmann (1987), and analyzed under an optical microscope used for the detection of gastrointestinal parasites. Eggs and oocysts were measured with the aid of Moticam 3.0 coupled to Nikon E200 microscope 40x and 100x magnification, and identified according to Moravec (1982) and Foreyt (2013). The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites was recorded considering location, host species, and parasite species, and the confidence interval (CI) for the total percentage of parasitized animals was calculated. The following variables associated with the presence of parasites were analyzed using the chi-square test: presence or absence of contact animals in the enclosures, enclosure size, and type of food. The difference between the number of positives based on flotation and sedimentation techniques was also compared.

The overall prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in the samples analyzed was 71.8% (CI 55.1–83.0; 28/39). The prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites at the GZP was 77.8% (CI 55.4–93.3; 14/18), and in the IOP was 66.7% (CI 43.0–85.4; 14/21). Ancylostomatidae, Toxocara spp., Toxascaris leonina, Strongyloides spp., Calodium hepaticum (syn. Capillaria hepatica), and Trematoda eggs and Cystoisospora spp. oocysts were observed from the samples.

A higher environmental diversity was observed at the IOP than that at the GZP, with few sparsely vegetated areas, and many densely vegetated areas and lakes, and some felids practice exercises outside their territory. Seven animals lived in isolation, others had at least one contact, and maned wolves (Chrysocyon brachyurus) shared a habitat with tapirs (Tapirus terrestris). The other enclosures were shared among congener species. Animal fur and bones were observed in most animal enclosures. The diet consisted of white-lipped peccary (Tayassu pecari) meat raised at the same institution, slaughterhouse donations, and carcasses collected from wild animals run over by traffic on highways. The diets of canids and raccoons comprised meat and fruits.

In the GZP, the enclosures were similar. The habitat for large cats was vast, with trunks, platforms, lakes, and streams, with little or no vegetation. For smaller cats, the enclosure was small, with few vegetation, burrows, and small ponds. The environment, clothes, and shoes of the caregivers were sanitized daily. The animal diet consisted of red meat and chicken.

In both institutions, the presence of synanthropic animals in the enclosures (pigeons, rats and lizards) was observed. The presence of domestic animals near the enclosures, such as dogs and cats, was also observed in both institutions. None of the institutions described to us the origin of each animal. The two institutions have veterinary assistance, but the IOP did not carry out periodic examinations or treatments, only under suspicion of parasitic disease, while the GZP carried out coproparasitological examinations every six months and treatment in parasitized animals.

None of the variables analyzed was correlated with parasitosis (p > 0.05). No significant differences between the flotation and sedimentation techniques were noted. The results of the present study are shown in Tables 2 and 3. The helminth eggs and protozoan oocysts identified in the present study are shown in Figure 1.

Table 2
Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites at the Instituto Onça Pintada and the Goiânia Zoological Park, Goiás separately by institution.

Species	Conservation Institute in Mineiros			Goiânia Zoological Park
	N	Parasite (n+)		N	Parasite (n+)
Felidae
Panthera tigris	-	-		4	Toxocara spp (1)
					Cystoisospora spp (2)
Panthera leo	-	-		2	-
Panthera onca	16	Ancylostomatidae (1)		5	Ancylostomatidae (1)
		Strongyloides spp. (1)			Toxocara spp. (2)
		Trematoda (10)			Cystoisospora spp. (4)
Puma concolor	1	Toxascaris leonina (1)		1	-
		Trematoda (1)
Leopardus pardalis	-	-		4	Ancylostomatidae (1)
					Toxocara spp. (2)
					Trematoda (1)
					Cystosospora spp. (1)
Herpailurus yagouaroundi	-	-		1	Toxocara spp. (1)
Canidae
Chrysocyon brachyurus	3	Calodium hepaticum (1)
		Trematoda (1)
Cerdocyon thous	-	-		1	Cystoisospora spp. (1)
Procyonidae
Potos flavus	1	-		-	-

Table 3
Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites at the Instituto Onça Pintada and the Goiânia Zoological Park, Goiás separately by parasite species.

Species	Occurrence % (Npositive/Ntotal)
	Ancylostomatidae	Toxocara spp.	Toxascaris leonina	Strongyloides spp.	Calodium hepaticum	Trematoda	Cystoisospora spp.
Felidae
Panthera tigris	-	25.0 (1/4)	-	-	-	-	50.0 (2/4)
Panthera leo	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Panthera onca	9.5 (2/21)	9.5 (2/21)	-	4.8 (1/21)	-	47.6 (10/21)	19.0 (4/21)
Puma concolor	-	-	50.0 (1/2)	-	-	50.0 (1/2)	-
Leopardus pardalis	25.0 (1/4)	50.0 (2/4)	-	-	-	25.0 (1/4)	25.0 (1/4)
Herpailurus yagouaroundi	-	100.0 (1/1)	-	-	-	-	-
Canidae
Chrysocyon brachyurus	-	-	-	-	33.3 (1/3)	33.3 (1/3)	-
Cerdocyon thous	-	-	-	-	-	-	100.0 (1/1)
Procyonidae
Potos flavus	-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Figure 1
Eggs and oocysts of gastrointestinal parasites in stool samples from carnivorous mammals from the Instituto Onça Pintada, Brazil and Zoological Park of Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil. (A) Toxocara spp. egg (bar. 90µm), (B) Ancylostomatidae egg (bar. 35µm), (C) Strongyloides spp. egg (bar. 80µm), (D) Calodium hepaticum egg (bar. 30µm), (E) Trematoda egg (bar. 55µm) and (F) Cystoisospora spp. oocyst (bar. 50µm).

Hookworms are geohelminths with a direct life cycle and can cause hemorrhagic gastroenteritis and in Brazil, the genus Ancylostoma is the most prevalent in domestic dogs and felines, leading to the contamination of many public places and is a health risk (Santos et al., 2020). Furthermore, the genus Ancylostoma has been reported in several wild animals (Aranda et al., 2013; Ramadevi & Venu, 2020). The occurrence of Ancylostoma in Panthera onca and Leopardus pardalis observed in the present study demonstrates the susceptibility of wild animals to parasitic species affecting domestic animals. Animals in captivity are infected owing to contamination of the environment by domestic animals living around the wild animal enclosures (Lo et al., 2021). Another recurrent hookworm species in wild carnivores is Uncinaria stenocephala, with several reports, especially in Europe, with higher prevalences than Ancylostoma species in some countries, and despite lesions similar to Ancylostoma in animals, its zoonotic potential is unclear (Otranto & Deplazes, 2019).

Toxocara spp. are zoonotic and cosmopolitan nematodes prevalent in young animals (Dantas-Torres, 2020). Reports of P. onca, Panthera tigris, L. pardalis, and Herpailurus yagouaroundi infection by Toxocara spp. are common and have been described in captive animals in other studies (Uribe et al., 2021). Infection occurs through environmental contamination through egg dispersal by infected animals. However, small rodents are paratenic hosts (Santos et al., 2009) and carry the parasites into the animal enclosures; thus, the occurrence of helminths in captive carnivores.

Toxascaris leonina are morphologically and biologically similar to Toxocara spp., and occurs less frequently in young animals, as there is no transmammary or transplacental transmission. Transmission by paratenic hosts is more common, as the T. leonina host range is bigger than that of other parasites, ranging from rodents to birds (Okulewicz et al., 2012). Therefore, adult animals are more easily infected since they hunt more successfully. Toxascaris leonina parasitizing on Puma concolor at the Conservation Institute of Mineiros, Brazil, is correlated with the consumption of carcasses of run-over animals recorded at the institution; however, infection through the contaminated environment is possible since some animals were exercised in the area surrounding the animal enclosures.

Strongyloides is a genus of parasitic nematodes with more than 50 species parasitizing the digestive system of vertebrates (amphibians, reptiles, and birds) and mammals, including humans (Viney & Lok, 2015). Most Strongyloides spp. are asymptomatic and self-limiting. However, low pathogenicity and high infection can cause diarrhea, fecal mucus, skin lesions, bronchopneumonia, intestinal nodules, and severe enteritis (Thamsborg et al., 2017). In the present study, Strongyloides spp. parasitism was observed in one P. onca, already reported previously (Aranda et al., 2013). Oliveira et al. (2001) listed the main felid parasites and revealed Strongyloides spp. parasitism in South American zoos, demonstrating the high adaptability of the Strongyloides genus to different regions, diverse environments, and various hosts.

Calodium hepaticum are widely distributed zoonotic nematodes parasitizing the liver of rodents, lagomorphs, mustelids, canids, felids, and primates, including humans (Misra et al., 2019). Adult C. hepaticum worms reproduce in the liver parenchyma cells. Females oviposit encapsulated eggs; therefore, are not released directly into the environment (Li et al., 2010; Misra et al., 2019). Therefore, C. hepaticum infection occurs after liver ingestion, predation, cannibalism, or carcass consumption or eggs released into the soil during host decomposition (Li et al., 2010). In the present study, C. hepaticum eggs were found in maned wolf (C. brachyurus) feces. Reports of C. hepaticum parasitism in maned wolves are limited, with one report by Massara et al. (2015) in a free-ranging wolf in the southwestern Brazil peri-urban region owing to a possible transmission between domestic dogs and wolves. Furthermore, C. hepaticum eggs in maned wolf feces do not always indicate parasitism. Owing to the supply of contaminated carcasses, the eggs present in the liver of these carcasses passed through the gastrointestinal tract of animals, and the infection may or may not have occurred. Wild animal carcasses are offered to the IOP where the animal lived presenting another possible transmission route.

Trematoda is a group of more than 24,000 species (Bolek et al., 2019), and their eggs are found in felids and other mammalian species (Basu & Charles, 2014). Trematoda infection of carnivores in the present study was correlated with the consumption of carcasses, small rodents, or synanthropic reptiles that may be present in the enclosures and function as intermediate or paratenic hosts of this group of helminths. Morphological differentiation of eggs of this group is difficult because of the morphological similarities between the eggs of the species.

In the present study, Cystoisospora spp. parasitizing P. tigris, P. onca, L. pardalis, and C. thous was observed. Several studies have reported Cystoisospora spp presence in wild felids. Lima et al. (2020) revealed that the presence of Cystoisospora spp. in P. concolor, H. yagouaroundi, and Leopardus guttulus correlate with the presence of feral cats, which are potential sources of infection for wild animals. Thus, managing captive feral cats in conservation institutions may control diseases in wild carnivores.

Helminth eggs and protozoan oocysts infecting domestic animals and humans were found in wild carnivores at the two conservation institutions sampled. Parasite management strategies for captive animals are recommended. Additionally, identifying possible synanthropic and domestic animals with access to captivity enclosures and their surroundings that serve as intermediate and paratenic hosts is recommended. Strategies to prevent parasitosis, such as providing adequate food and periodic diagnosis of parasites, are essential because captive animals are more susceptible to parasites than free-living animals.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel in Brazil (CAPES) for granting a scholarship to Renan Mendes Pires Moreira and supporting the Graduate Program of Animal Bioscience of the Federal University of Jataí. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

• How to cite: Moreira RMP, Aires CG, Alves-Sobrinho AV, Moraes IS, Moreira CN, Amaral AVC, et al. Gastrointestinal parasites of wild carnivores from conservation institutions in the Cerrado of Goiás, Brazil. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2023; 32(3): e004823. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023028

References

• Aranda CR, Serrano-Martinez E, Taltaleán MV, Quispe MH, Casas VG. Identification and frequency of gastrointestinal parasites in captive wild cats in Peru. Rev Investig Vet Peru 2013; 24(3): 360-368.
• Basu AK, Charles RA. A review of the cat liver fluke Platynosomum fastosum Kossack, 1910 (Trematoda: dicrocoeliidae). Vet Parasitol 2014; 200(1-2): 1-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.12.016 PMid:24412358.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.12.016
• Bolek MG, Detwiler JT, Stigge HA. Selected wildlife trematodes. In: Toledo R, Fried B, editors. Digenetic trematodes Cham: Springer; 2019. p. 321-355. (Advances in experimental medicine and biology; vol. 1154). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18616-6_11
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18616-6_11
• Brasil. Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia. Ministério da Agricultura e Pecuária. Gráficos climatológicos [online]. Brasília: Instituto Nacional de Meteorologia; 2020 [cited 2023 Apr 10]. Available from: https://portal.inmet.gov.br/servicos/gr%c3%a1ficos-climatol%c3%b3gicos
  » https://portal.inmet.gov.br/servicos/gr%c3%a1ficos-climatol%c3%b3gicos
• Calaça AM, Melo FR, Marco P Jr, Jácomo ATA, Silveira L. A influência da fragmentação sobre a distribuição de carnívoros em uma paisagem de cerrado. Neotrop Biol Conserv 2010; 5(1): 31-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/nbc.2010.51.05
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/nbc.2010.51.05
• Dantas-Torres F. Toxocara prevalence in dogs and cats in Brazil. Adv Parasitol 2020; 109: 715-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.028 PMid:32381224.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2020.01.028
• Foreyt WJ. Veterinary parasitology reference manual Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
• Hoffmann RP. Diagnóstico de parasitismo veterinário Porto Alegre: Sulina; 1987.
• Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade. Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção: volume ii - mamíferos Brasília: ICMBio/MMA; 2018.
• Li CD, Yang HL, Wang Y. Capillaria hepatica in China. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16(6): 698-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i6.698 PMid:20135717.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i6.698
• Lima TA, Salgado PAB, Chagas CRF, Ramos PL, Adriano EA, Gonzalez IHL. Feral cats: parasitic reservoirs in our zoos? Open J Vet Med 2020; 10(8): 126-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2020.108011
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojvm.2020.108011
• Lo CLC, Fernandez DAP, Luna MCT, Guia APO, Paller VGV. Diet, parasites, and other pathogens of Sunda leopard cats (Prionailurus javanensis Desmarest 1816) in Aborlan, Palawan Island, Philippines. J Parasit Dis 2021; 45(3): 627-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-020-01335-0 PMid:34475642.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12639-020-01335-0
• Massara RL, Paschoal AMO, Chiarello AG. Parasitas gastrointestinais de lobo-guará (Chrysocyon brachyurus, Illiger 1815) em uma área suburbana no sudeste do Brasil. Braz J Biol 2015; 75(3): 643-649. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.20013 PMid:26421763.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.20013
• Misra S, Nanda P, Nandan D, Sakhuja P. Capillaria hepatica: report from North India. Trop Gastroenterol 2019; 40(3): 118-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.7869/tg.551
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.7869/tg.551
• Moravec F. Proposal of a new systematic arrangement of nematodes of the family Capillariidae. Folia Parasitol 1982; 29(2): 119-132. PMid:7106653.
• Okulewicz A, Perec-Matysiak A, Bunkowska K, Hildebrand J. Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati and Toxascaris leonina in wild and domestic carnivores. Helminthologia 2012; 49(1): 3-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11687-012-0001-6
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11687-012-0001-6
• Oliveira TG, Eizirik E, Crawshaw PG. Order Carnivora, family Felidae (cats). In: Fowler ME, Cubas ZS, editors. Biology, medicine, and surgery of South American wild animals Ames: Iowa State University Press; 2001. p. 291-316.
• Otranto D, Deplazes P. Zoonotic nematodes of wild carnivores. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 2019; 9: 370-383. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.011 PMid:31338295.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2018.12.011
• Ramadevi P, Venu R. Coprological survey of gastrointestinal parasitism in captive wildlife of three zoological parks located in southern India. Ind J An Sci 2020; 90(4): 547-552. http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104192
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.56093/ijans.v90i4.104192
• Santos B, Silva ANF, Mora SEV, Koslowski- VA No, Justo AA, Pantoja JCF, et al. Epidemiological aspects of Ancylostoma spp. infection in naturally infected dogs from São Paulo state, Brazil. Vet Parasitol Reg Stud Reports 2020; 22: 100452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2020.100452 PMid:33308717.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2020.100452
• Santos SV, Lescano SZ, Castro JM, Chieffi PP. Larval recovery of Toxocara cati in experimentally infected Rattus norvegicus and analysis of the rat as potential reservoir for this ascarid. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2009; 104(6): 933-934. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762009000600020 PMid:19876570.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762009000600020
• Sprenger LK, Yoshitani UY, Buzatti A, Molento MB. Occurrence of gastrointestinal parasites in wild animals in State of Paraná, Brazil. An Acad Bras Cienc 2018; 90(1): 231-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720150030 PMid:29340477.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0001-3765201720150030
• Thamsborg SM, Ketzis J, Horii Y, Matthews JB. Strongyloides spp. infections of veterinary importance. Parasitology 2017; 144(3): 274-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016001116 PMid:27374886.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016001116
• Uribe M, Payán E, Brabec J, Vélez J, Taubert A, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, et al. Intestinal parasites of neotropical wild jaguars, pumas, ocelots, and jaguarundis in Colombia: old friends brought back from oblivion and new insights. Pathogens 2021; 10(7): 822. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822 PMid:34209062.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10070822
• Viney ME, Lok JB. The biology of Strongyloides spp. WormBook 2015; 16: 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.141.2 PMid:26183912.
  » http://dx.doi.org/10.1895/wormbook.1.141.2

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  22 May 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  13 Mar 2023
• Accepted
  12 Apr 2023