Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibody seroprevalence and risk factors among dogs treated at Public Veterinary Hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil

Soroprevalência de anticorpos anti-Toxoplasma gondii e Neospora caninum em cães atendidos em Hospitais Públicos Veterinários em São Paulo, Brasil

Abstract

Dogs can be infected by Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum, for which they function, respectively, as intermediate, and definitive hosts. In the present study seroprevalence against T. gondii and N. caninum antibodies, were determined by indirect fluorescent antibody test (cut off of 16 and 50, respectively), in dogs that were treated at public veterinary hospitals in the metropolitan region of São Paulo and risk factors were identified. Out of the 1,194 samples 125 (10.5%; 95% CI: 8.8-12.3%) were positive for T. gondii and 9 (0.75%, 95% CI: 0.34-1.4%) for N. caninum. For T. gondii, statistical differences were observed between the proportions of positive dogs and different zones of the municipality (p = 0.025), and age (p = 0.02), higher among older dogs. The keepers were invited to answer an epidemiological questionnaire to analyze risk factors, and 471 (39.4%) agreed to be interviewed, and among their dogs 65 (13.8%) were T. gondii seropositive. Age group above 8 years (OR = 3.63; 95% CI: 1.08-12.23) was a risk factor and having a defined breed (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.25-0.96) was a protective factor for T. gondii infection. Because of the low number of dogs positive for N. caninum, risk factors for this coccidium were not determined.

Keywords:
Protozoa; dogs; risk factors; coccidia

Resumo

Cães podem ser infectados por Toxoplasma gondii e Neospora caninum, os quais funcionam, respectivamente, como hospedeiros intermediários e definitivos. Neste estudo, a soroprevalência contra anticorpos anti-T. gondii e N. caninum foi determinada pelo teste de imunofluorescência indireta (ponto de corte de 16 e 50, respectivamente), em cães atendidos em hospitais públicos veterinários da região metropolitana de São Paulo e fatores de risco foram identificados. Das 1.194 amostras, 125 (10,5%; IC 95%: 8,8-12,3%) foram positivas para T. gondii e 9 (0,75%, IC 95%: 0,34-1,4%) para N. caninum. Para T. gondii foram observadas diferenças entre as proporções de cães positivos e diferentes zonas do município (p = 0,025) e idade (p = 0,02), prevalência maior entre os mais velhos. Os tutores foram convidados a responder um questionário epidemiológico para análise de fatores de risco, e 471 (39,4%) concordaram em ser entrevistados, destes 65 cães (13,8%) eram soropositivos para T. gondii. Faixa etária acima de 8 anos (OR = 3,63; IC 95%: 1,08-12,23) foi fator de risco e raça definida (OR = 0,49; IC 95%: 0,25-0,96) foi fator de proteção para a infecção por T. gondii. Devido ao baixo número de positivos para anticorpos anti-N. caninum, fatores de risco para este coccídio não foram determinados.

Palavras-chave:
Protozoários; cães; fatores de risco; coccídios

Introduction

Toxoplasmosis is a cosmopolitan zoonosis caused by the obligate intracellular coccidium Toxoplasma gondii (phylum Apicomplexa, family Sarcocystidae). Felines are the only definitive hosts of T. gondii, but the disease has complex epidemiology, infecting a wide variety of homeothermic species that behave as intermediate hosts (Dubey, 2016Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans. 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420092370.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420092370...
).

In humans, T. gondii infections are generally asymptomatic but establish persistent latent infection in tissues and severe clinical disease, even fatal, can be observed, mainly in neonates and immunocompromised individuals (Montoya & Liesenfeld, 2004Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004; 363(9425): 1965-1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X. PMid:15194258.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)...
; Murat et al., 2013Murat JB, Hidalgo HF, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Pelloux H. Human toxoplasmosis: which biological diagnostic tests are best suited to which clinical situations? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013; 11(9): 943-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2013.825441. PMid:24053275.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2013....
). In dogs and cats, T. gondii infection is associated with low rates of morbidity and mortality but important clinical consequences may be observed. Toxoplasmosis in dogs is generally linked with immunosuppression and absence of vaccination against canine distemper virus, however neurological and ocular diseases and cutaneous manifestations were already observed in dogs (Dubey & Jones, 2008Dubey JP, Jones JL. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int J Parasitol 2008; 38(11): 1257-1278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.007. PMid:18508057.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008....
; Calero-Bernal & Gennari, 2019Calero-Bernal R, Gennari SM. Clinical toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats: an update. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6: 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00054. PMid:30863754.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.000...
; Kolören & Dubey, 2020Kolören Z, Dubey JP. A review of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Turkey. Parasitology 2020; 147(1): 12-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019001318. PMid:31554526.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019001...
).

The seroprevalence of T. gondii antibodies in dogs in Brazil ranges from 3 to 90% (Dubey et al., 2012Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012; 139(11): 1375-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765. PMid:22776427.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000...
). In the municipality of São Paulo, the biggest city in this country, the occurrence rate among 118 stray dogs was found to be 35.8% (Dubey et al., 2007Dubey JP, Gennari SM, Sundar N, Vianna MCB, Bandini LM, Yai LEO, et al. Diverse and atypical genotypes identified in Toxoplasma gondii from dogs in São Paulo, Brazil. J Parasitol 2007; 93(1): 60-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1. PMid:17436942.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1...
). In another study in the same municipality, anti-T. gondii antibodies were found in 219 (19.7%) out of 1,110 dogs, among which 610 were stray and 500 were domiciled, with occurrence rates of 31.6% and 5.2%, respectively (Souza et al., 2003Souza SLP, Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SRN, Cardoso SMS, Guimarães JS Jr, et al. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sera from dogs of the urban and rural areas from Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(1): 1-3.), however these studies have more than 10 years and the majority of the samples were from stray dogs that normally have much higher chance to be infected by parasites.

Schares et al. (2005)Schares G, Pantchev N, Barutzki D, Heydorn AO, Bauer C, Conraths FJ. Oocysts of Neospora caninum, Hammondia heydorni, Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia hammondi in faeces collected from dogs in Germany. Int J Parasitol 2005; 35(14): 1525-1537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.008. PMid:16197949.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005....
found viable oocysts in feces of dogs that had ingested cat feces. Furthermore, from examination of fecal samples from 120 dogs, Munoz & Mayer (2016)Munoz J, Mayer DCG. Toxoplasma gondii and Giardia duodenalis infections in domestic dogs in New York City public parks. Vet J 2016; 211: 97-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.015. PMid:26988633.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02...
found that four of them were positive for T. gondii DNA, due to some dogs’ habit of ingesting feces. Toxoplasma gondii oocysts can be mechanical transmitted to humans by the dogs, by contact with oocysts that may be present in the coat of dogs (Lindsay et al., 1997Lindsay DS, Dubey JP, Butler JM, Blagburn BL. Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Vet Parasitol 1997; 73(1-2): 27-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00048-4. PMid:9477489.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)...
; Frenkel et al., 2003Frenkel JK, Lindsay DS, Parker BB, Dobesh M. Dogs as possible mechanical carriers of Toxoplasma, and their fur as a source of infection of young children. Int J Infect Dis 2003; 7(4): 292-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1201-9712(03)90112-3. PMid:14656424.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1201-9712(03)...
). Etheredge et al. (2004)Etheredge GD, Michael G, Muehlenbein MP, Frenkel JK. The roles of cats and dogs in the transmission of Toxoplasma infection in Kuna and Embera children in eastern Panama. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2004; 16(3): 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892004000900004. PMid:15507185.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892004...
, in a study with children that have contact with dogs, cats and soil, found that play with dogs was a risk factor to T. gondii seropositivity, confirming the importance of dogs as mechanical source of oocysts.

Neospora caninum is an obligate intracellular cyst-forming protozoon of the phylum Apicomplexa that causes neosporosis. This coccidium affects domestic and wild animals, with special importance in dogs and cattle (Dubey et al., 2017Dubey JP, Hemphill A, Calero-Bernal R, Schares G. Neosporosis in animals. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561...
). The definitive hosts are dogs (McAllister et al., 1998McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM. Rapid communication: dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28(9): 1473-1478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00138-6. PMid:9770635.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)...
) and some species of wild canids, such as coyotes (Gondim et al., 2004Gondim LFP, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34(2): 159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001. PMid:15037103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004....
), dingoes (King et al., 2010King JS, Slapeta J, Jenkins DJ, Al-Qassab SE, Ellis JT, Windsor PA. Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(8): 945-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008. PMid:20149793.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010....
) and gray wolves (Dubey et al., 2011Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Rajendran C, Miska K, Ferreira LR, Martins J, et al. Gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a natural definitive host for Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 2011; 181(2-4): 382-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018. PMid:21640485.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011....
). It is not considered to be a zoonotic agent, even though antibodies against N. caninum have already been found in humans (Lobato et al., 2006Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Silva GR Segundo, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006. PMid:16426004.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89...
; Oshiro et al., 2015Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015. PMid:26516966.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151...
; Duarte et al., 2020Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1. PMid:32493968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-659...
) and DNA in blood samples from human umbilical cord (Duarte et al., 2020Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1. PMid:32493968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-659...
), however the parasite has not yet been detected in tissues.

Numerous studies on occurrences of N. caninum antibodies in dogs have been conducted in Brazil and have found rates ranging from 2.6% to 67.6% [reviewed by Cerqueira-Cézar et al. (2017)Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Calero-Bernal R, Dubey JP, Gennari SM. All about neosporosis in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2017; 26(3): 253-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017045. PMid:28876360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017...
]. Gennari et al. (2002)Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SNR, Cardoso SMS, Kwok OCH, Jenkins MC, et al. Occurrence of Neospora caninum antibodies in sera from dogs of the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2002; 106(2): 177-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00052-3. PMid:12031819.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)...
, in the city of São Paulo, found occurrence rates of 10% in domiciled dogs and 25% in stray dogs.

In 2012, the first public veterinary hospital in Brazil was inaugurated in the municipality of São Paulo. By 2022, there were four hospital units providing free clinical and surgical care for dogs and cats in the metropolitan region of São Paulo (Navarro, 2015Navarro GCB. A proteção aos animais e a ampliação do enfoque das políticas públicas: o caso dos hospitais públicos veterinários. INTERthesis 2015; 12(1): 84-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2015...
).

The state of São Paulo, Brazil, has a population of approximately 13 million dogs and the state capital, São Paulo, around 3,5 million dogs (ABINPET, 2021Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Produtos para Animais de Estimação – ABINPET. Mercado [online]. São Paulo: ABINPET. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 19]. Available from: http://abinpet.org.br/mercado
http://abinpet.org.br/mercado...
), and there are no studies using the dog’s population of all the zones of the municipality. The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalences of T. gondii and N. caninum and risk factors for these parasites infection among domiciled dogs that are taken to public veterinary hospital services located in different regions of the metropolitan region of São Paulo.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection

All samples used in the present study were from dogs attended in Public Hospitals, however the real economic status of the families was not possible to be obtained, however they represent a wide number of animals that live with families that cannot afford to pay a private veterinary service.

Sampling was conducted according to convenience, between August 2021 and July 2022, among dogs that were treated at public veterinary hospitals in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, regardless of clinical suspicion and symptoms. The samples came from four hospitals: three located in the municipality of São Paulo, in the districts of Tatuapé (EZ - east zone), Casa Verde (NZ - north zone) and Jurubatuba (SZ - south zone); and one hospital located in the municipality of Osasco, which borders the west zone (WZ) of the state capital. At the time of obtaining the samples, files containing data about the animal (name, breed, sex, and age) and the owner (name and address) were also created.

The owners of all the study animals were contacted and invited to participate in the study through answering an epidemiological questionnaire, to gain more information than what was available from the clinical files. In the total 1,194 samples were obtained (364 from EZ, 214 from NZ, 250 from SZ and 366 from WZ) and 471 owners accepted to answer the questionnaire (167, 75, 121 and 108, respectively from East, North, South, and West zone).

The distribution between the gender was uniform, with totals of 544 males (45.6%) and 650 females (54.4%). Mixed-breed dogs accounted for the highest percentage of the sampling, with 906 animals (75.9%), while the other 288 (24.1%) were dogs of different breeds. The youngest animal sampled was four months old and the oldest was 20 years old.

Serum antibody analyses

Serum samples were analyzed by means of the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) for detection of antibodies against T. gondii, as described by Camargo (1974)Camargo ME. Introdução às técnicas de imunofluorescência. Rev Bras Patol Clin 1974; 10: 143-169., and against N. caninum (Dubey et al., 1988Dubey JP, Hattel AL, Lindsay DS, Topper MJ. Neonatal Neospora caninum infection in dogs: isolation of the causative agent and experimental transmission. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193(10): 1259-1263. PMid:3144521.), using cutoffs of 16 and 50, respectively (Valadas et al., 2010Valadas S, Minervino AHH, Lima VMF, Soares RM, Ortolani EL, Gennari SM. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum, anti-Toxoplasma gondii, and anti-Leishmania chagasi in serum of dogs from Pará State, Amazon, Brazil. Parasitol Res 2010; 107(2): 453-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1890-2. PMid:20445991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-189...
). Tachyzoites from the T. gondii RH strain, maintained in mice, and the N. caninum NC-1 strain, maintained in cell cultures, were used as antigens. Anti-dog IgG conjugate (Sigma®, USA), obtained from rabbits and labeled with fluorescein isothiocyanate, was used at a dilution of 1:600 in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) at pH 7.2, containing 0.01% Evan’s blue. On each slide, positive and negative control serum was added. Reactive T. gondii and N. caninum serum samples were titrated at base two until the last positive dilution.

Application of epidemiological questionnaire

After samples had been received, the keepers of the animals that had been examined were contacted by telephone and/or text message, regardless of the results obtained from the samples. Out of the total number of keepers invited to provide additional information, 471 of them agreed to participate in the risk factor analyses and answered a questionnaire containing questions relating to T. gondii and N. caninum epidemiology. The interview was always done by the same person.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis of this study has two main objectives: first, to estimate the seroprevalences of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies and their respective confidence intervals; second, to analyze the association between the presence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and potential risk factors.

Confidence intervals for the estimates of the seroprevalences of anti-T. gondii and anti-N. caninum antibodies were calculated according to zone, age group, sex, breed and in total, using the exact binomial distribution. A comparison of the proportion of positives between the categories of the factors (zone, age group, sex and breed) was performed using the χ2 test. In these analyses, data referring to all animals (n = 1194) were used. The significance level adopted in the comparisons was 5%.

To study the association between the presence of anti-T. gondii antibodies and risk factors, data from interviews were used (n = 471). The following variables were analyzed: sex, age group (under 1 year old, between 1 and 8 years old or over 8 years old), breed (with or without defined breed), zone (west, south, east or north), access to streets (yes or no), contact with other animal species (no contact or contact with dogs, cats or other animals) and food (commercial, homemade or mixed). An exploratory analysis on the data (univariate analysis) was performed to select the variables for use as part of the logistic regression model, using the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test, with a selection criterion of p ≤ 0.20. Statistical analyses were performed using the R language, version 4.2.2 (R Core Team, 2022R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
https://www.R-project.org/...
), and the JASP program, version 0.16.2 (JASP Team, 2022JASP Team. JASP: a fresh way to do statistics [software]. Amsterdam: The JASP Team; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 20]. Available from: https://jasp-stats.org
https://jasp-stats.org...
).

Results

Toxoplasma gondii

In the present study, the prevalence of positivity for anti-T. gondii antibodies among the dogs sampled was 10.5% (95% CI: 8.8% - 12.3%), i.e., 125 out of the 1,194 animals examined were reactive. The IgG antibody titers were: 32 (n = 51), 64 (n = 26), 128 (n = 25), 256 (n = 10), 512 (n = 4), 1024 (n = 2), 2048 (n = 5) and 4096 (n = 2). The prevalence results according to place of origin of the dogs are shown in in Figure 1 and Table 1.

Figure 1
Location of the Public Veterinary Hospital, in the municipality of São Paulo, Brazil, where the dog’s serum samples were obtained, and prevalence values of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies.
Table 1
Prevalence (95% confidence interval, CI) of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in dogs treated at Public Veterinary Hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, 2022.

Questionnaire and risk factors

Out of the 1,194 owners, 471 (39.4%) agreed to answer the questionnaire and, among their dogs, 65 (13.8%) were positive for anti-T. gondii antibodies. The interview data were used to assess risk factors for T. gondii infection. The results from the univariate analysis are presented in Table 2. The selected variables were age group (p = 0.006), breed (p = 0.020), access to the street (p = 0.132) and diet (p = 0.074).

Table 2
Results from univariate analysis regarding possible risk factors for the presence of anti-T. gondii antibodies in dogs (n = 471) in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2022.

The results from the multiple logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 3. The final logistic regression model for the prevalence of anti-T. gondii antibodies indicated that the age group above 8 years (OR = 3.63; 95% CI: 1.08 – 12.23) had a higher chance of being positive for T. gondii antibodies than did the other age groups. Furthermore, it indicated that defined-breed animals had a lower chance of being positive for T. gondii antibodies than did mixed-breed animals (OR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.25 – 0.96).

Table 3
Results from multiple logistic regression analysis on risk factors for the presence of anti-Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic dogs in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2022.

Neospora caninum

Out of the 1,194 serum samples analyzed, 9 (0.75%; 95% CI: 0.34% - 1.4%) were positive for anti-N. caninum, with IgG antibody titers of 50 (n = 1), 100 (n = 1), 200 (n = 4), 400 (n = 2) and 800 (n = 1).

All the dogs that were positive for anti-N. caninum antibodies were negative for T. gondii. Because of the low prevalence observed, no statistical analysis on the findings regarding N. caninum was carried out and these results are only presented descriptively (Table 4).

Table 4
Prevalence of dogs positive for anti-N. caninum antibodies in dogs treated at Public Veterinary Hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil, 2022.

Discussion

In the present study, the prevalence of positivity for anti-T. gondii antibodies among the dogs sampled was 10.5% indicating that domestic dogs in the metropolitan region of São Paulo are exposed to infection by this coccidium. In the same city, a study carried out among domestic and stray dogs, found rates of 5.2% (26 out of 500) and 31.6% (193 out of 610), respectively, and it was used the same methodology and cut-off point (Souza et al., 2003Souza SLP, Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SRN, Cardoso SMS, Guimarães JS Jr, et al. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sera from dogs of the urban and rural areas from Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(1): 1-3.). These rates were lower than what was observed in the present study among domiciled dogs.

However, this proportion of positivity was lower than those found by Meireles et al. (2004)Meireles LR, Galisteo AJ Jr, Pompeu E, Andrade HF Jr. Toxoplasma gondii spreading in an urban area evaluated by seroprevalence in free-living cats and dogs. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9(8): 876-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01280.x. PMid:15303992.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.20...
and Dubey et al. (2007)Dubey JP, Gennari SM, Sundar N, Vianna MCB, Bandini LM, Yai LEO, et al. Diverse and atypical genotypes identified in Toxoplasma gondii from dogs in São Paulo, Brazil. J Parasitol 2007; 93(1): 60-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1. PMid:17436942.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1...
among stray dogs in the same city, with rates of 50.5% (101 out of 200) and 35.8% (42 out of 118), respectively. However, it is worth remembering that these comparisons must be made with care, since the diagnostic methods were not similar, and the dogs in the present study were all domiciled.

In a recent review of T. gondii in dogs worldwide, Dubey et al. (2020)Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Yang Y, Su C. Toxoplasma gondii infections in dogs: 2009-2020. Vet Parasitol 2020; 287: 109223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109223. PMid:33160144.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020....
reported occurrence rates in studies carried out between 2009 and 2020 ranging from 1.9% to 97%; with Brazilian studies values ranging from 6.7% to 88.5%. The authors commented that although several studies have been conducted in Brazil, few of them included more than 300 dogs, however high occurrence rates were observed in the Brazilian studies when compared with results from dogs of other parts of the world, and comparisons between them can be made securely since the same diagnostic test (IFAT) and same cutoff point (16) were used in most of the Brazilian studies.

In the state of São Paulo, seroepidemiological surveys carried out among dogs over the last 20 years have used very different samples, regarding the number of dogs, whether neurological problems were presented or not, where the dogs were living (rural or urban environment) and whether data collection was in connection with a vaccination campaign, among other different characteristics. In these studies, the occurrence rates for anti-T. gondii antibodies ranged from 5.1% to 50% (Silva et al., 2010Silva RC, Souza LC, Langoni H, Tanaka EM, Lima VY, Silva AV. Risk factors and presence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from the coast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Pesq Vet Bras 2010; 30(2): 161-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010000200011.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010...
; Aguiar et al., 2012Aguiar DM, Amude AM, Santos LGF, Ribeiro MG, Ueno TEH, Megid J, et al. Canine distemper virus and Toxoplasma gondii co-infection in dogs with neurological signs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2012; 64(1): 221-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000100032.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012...
; Langoni et al., 2012Langoni H, Matteucci G, Medici B, Camossi LG, Richini-Pereira VB, Silva RC. Detection and molecular analysis of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum from dogs with neurological disorders. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012; 45(3): 365-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012000300016. PMid:22760137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012...
, 2013Langoni H, Fornazari F, Silva RC, Monti ET, Villa FB. Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs. Braz J Microbiol 2013; 44(4): 1327-1330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000400043. PMid:24688530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013...
; Paulan et al., 2013Paulan SC, Lins AGS, Tenório MS, Silva DT, Pena HFJ, Machado RZ, et al. Seroprevalence rates of antibodies against Leishmania infantum and other protozoan and rickettsial parasites in dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2013; 22(1): 162-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013000100031. PMid:24252965.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013...
; Zanette et al., 2014Zanette MF, Lima VMF, Laurenti MD, Rossi CN, Vides JP, Vieira RFC, et al. Serological cross-reactivity of Trypanosoma cruzi, Ehrlichia canis, Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Babesia canis to Leishmania infantum chagasi tests in dogs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2014; 47(1): 105-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1723-2013. PMid:24603745.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1723...
; Seabra et al., 2015Seabra NM, Pereira VF, Kuwassaki MV, Benassi JC, Oliveira TMF. Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leishmania spp. serology and Leishmania spp. PCR in dogs from Pirassununga, SP. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(4): 454-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015046. PMid:26689180.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015...
; Olbera et al., 2020Olbera AVG, Fornazari F, Babboni SD, Rossi RS, Sevá AP, Latosinski GS, et al. Cumulative incidence and spatial distribution of dogs exposed to Toxoplasma gondii. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2020; 29(2): e000820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020025. PMid:32490893.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020...
; Sevá et al., 2020Sevá AP, Chiebao DP, Brandão APD, Godoy SN, Jimenez-Villegas T, Pena HFJ, et al. Seroprevalence and incidence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infection in naturally exposed domestic dogs from a rural area of São Paulo state, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2020; 29(3): e008820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020053. PMid:33027425.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020...
).

The low prevalence found among domiciled dogs in the present study, even among those that were allowed out into the streets, is an interesting result because it indicates that few dogs have contact with T. gondii oocysts in the environment or with cysts in infected meat.

A recent study carried out in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro (Arruda et al., 2021Arruda IF, Millar PR, Barbosa AS, Abboud LCS, Reis IC, Moreira ASC, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021; 28: 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021049. PMid:34236311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/20210...
) also evaluated domiciled dogs in different areas of the city. They found a prevalence of 34% (136/400), i.e., three times higher than what was observed in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, also using IFAT (>16) as diagnostic test.

Regarding the zone of São Paulo in which the samples were collected, the analysis on all the sampled animals (n = 1,194) showed that the prevalence in the EZ and SZ were statistically higher, however this information should be analyzed with care once it is not possible to affirm that the dogs always lived in the same region and that they acquire the infection in the region where they live when sampled. Also, the present results need future studies trying to get information about the socio-economic status of the families that use the public veterinary hospitals in the different zones of the city and the habits of the animals. The findings indicate that T. gondii is distributed throughout the region studied. This result is like what was found by Arruda et al. (2021)Arruda IF, Millar PR, Barbosa AS, Abboud LCS, Reis IC, Moreira ASC, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021; 28: 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021049. PMid:34236311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/20210...
in the metropolitan region of Rio de Janeiro: from analysis on the spatial distribution of the occurrence of parasitized dogs, they observed that positive animals were distributed among all the locations studied.

In the present study, none of the positive dogs showed antibody titers of 16. The most common titer was 32, which was seen in the cases of 51 positive dogs. There were 9 animals with titers of 512. The finding of a greater number of dogs with low antibody titers was also reported from a study on domestic dogs treated at a veterinary hospital in Cuiabá, MT, Brazil (Strital et al., 2016Strital AD, Igarashi M, Muraro LS, Aguiar DM, Pacheco TA, Garcia JL, et al. Estudo epidemiológico e avaliação de fatores de risco da infecção por Toxoplasma gondii e achados clinico-patológicos da infecção aguda em cães admitidos em um Hospital Escola Veterinário. Pesq Vet Bras 2016; 36(10): 993-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016001000012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016...
) and from a study on domestic dogs in the city of Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil (Arruda et al., 2021Arruda IF, Millar PR, Barbosa AS, Abboud LCS, Reis IC, Moreira ASC, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021; 28: 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021049. PMid:34236311.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/20210...
). According to Strital et al. (2016)Strital AD, Igarashi M, Muraro LS, Aguiar DM, Pacheco TA, Garcia JL, et al. Estudo epidemiológico e avaliação de fatores de risco da infecção por Toxoplasma gondii e achados clinico-patológicos da infecção aguda em cães admitidos em um Hospital Escola Veterinário. Pesq Vet Bras 2016; 36(10): 993-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016001000012.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016...
, titers from 16 to 512 can be considered to be contact titers and not situations of acute infection, i.e., they indicate previous contact with the parasite. In the present study, high antibody titers (1024, 2048 and 4096) were found in 9 samples and, given that these were obtained from dogs that were receiving hospital care, it can be assumed that some of them may have been obtained from dogs presenting conditions that lead to immunosuppression, such as ehrlichiosis or distemper, which are quite common in Brazil and which have already been correlated with T. gondii infection (Calero-Bernal & Gennari, 2019Calero-Bernal R, Gennari SM. Clinical toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats: an update. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6: 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00054. PMid:30863754.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.000...
), however it was not possible to assume that the animals were presenting those infections by the files.

Although neurological conditions have also been correlated with toxoplasmosis (Langoni et al., 2012Langoni H, Matteucci G, Medici B, Camossi LG, Richini-Pereira VB, Silva RC. Detection and molecular analysis of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum from dogs with neurological disorders. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012; 45(3): 365-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012000300016. PMid:22760137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012...
; Aguiar et al., 2012Aguiar DM, Amude AM, Santos LGF, Ribeiro MG, Ueno TEH, Megid J, et al. Canine distemper virus and Toxoplasma gondii co-infection in dogs with neurological signs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2012; 64(1): 221-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000100032.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012...
), none of the T. gondii positive dogs in the present study were showing nervous symptoms according to the descriptions found in the veterinary files. However, the information in these files is often superficial, considering that these files do not have the objective of providing all clinical observations.

Multivariate analysis was carried out using data from 471 dogs whose keepers answered the epidemiological questionnaire. The following variables were used: sex, age group, having a defined breed or not, area where the samples were obtained, contact with other animals and diet. Logistic regression pointed to age group (> 8 years old) as a risk factor and having a defined breed as a protective factor for infection by T. gondii. Out of the 471 dogs used for these analyses, 65 (13.8%) were seropositive for T. gondii, a result very similar to that found from the total sample (10.5%).

As already observed in other Brazilian studies in which domestic dogs were also sampled (Guimarães et al., 2009Guimarães AM, Rocha CMBM, Oliveira TMFS, Rosado IR, Morais LG, Santos RRD. Fatores associados à soropositividade para Babesia, Toxoplasma, Neospora e Leishmania em cães atendidos em nove clínicas veterinárias do município de Lavras, MG. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl S1): 49-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009. PMid:20040191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009...
; Moura et al., 2009Moura AB, Souza AP, Sartor AA, Bellato V, Teixeira EB, Pisetta GMP, et al. Ocorrência de anticorpos e fatores de risco para infecção por Toxoplasma gondii em cães, nas cidades de Lages e Balneário Camboriú, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009; 18(3): 52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009. PMid:19772776.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009...
; Dantas et al., 2013Dantas SBA, Fernandes ARF, Souza OL No, Mota RA, Alves CJ, Azevedo SS. Ocorrência e fatores de risco associados às infecções por Toxoplasma gondii e Neospora caninum em cães no município de Natal, Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil. Cienc Rural 2013; 43(11): 2042-2048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013001100020.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013...
; Langoni et al., 2013Langoni H, Fornazari F, Silva RC, Monti ET, Villa FB. Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs. Braz J Microbiol 2013; 44(4): 1327-1330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000400043. PMid:24688530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013...
; Benitez et al., 2017Benitez AN, Gonçalves DD, Nino BSL, Caldart ET, Freire RL, Navarro IT. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in humans and dogs from a small municipality in Parana, Brazil. Cienc Anim Bras 2017; 18: e4102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v18e-42102.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v18e-...
; Oliveira et al., 2019Oliveira GMS, Simões JM, Schaer RE, Freire SM, Nascimento RJM, Pinheiro AMCM, et al. Frequency and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and their pets in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2019; 52: e20190250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0250-2019. PMid:31800920.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0250...
), older animals in the present study were found to be more reactive to T. gondii. The oldest dogs (> 8 years old) presented the highest occurrence of T. gondii infection. This was probably due to the greater chance of exposure to the agent with increasing age.

Regarding the breed of the dogs, having a defined breed was a protective factor against T. gondii infection. Brito et al. (2002)Brito AF, Souza LC, Silva AV, Langoni H. Epidemiological and serological aspects in canine toxoplasmosis in animals with nervous symptoms. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97(1): 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762002000100003. PMid:11992143.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762002...
, Guimarães et al. (2009)Guimarães AM, Rocha CMBM, Oliveira TMFS, Rosado IR, Morais LG, Santos RRD. Fatores associados à soropositividade para Babesia, Toxoplasma, Neospora e Leishmania em cães atendidos em nove clínicas veterinárias do município de Lavras, MG. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl S1): 49-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009. PMid:20040191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009...
and Moura et al. (2009)Moura AB, Souza AP, Sartor AA, Bellato V, Teixeira EB, Pisetta GMP, et al. Ocorrência de anticorpos e fatores de risco para infecção por Toxoplasma gondii em cães, nas cidades de Lages e Balneário Camboriú, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009; 18(3): 52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009. PMid:19772776.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009...
observed, in studies carried out in Brazil among domestic dogs, that not having a defined breed was a risk factor for infection. They attributed this finding to the likelihood that the owners of these dogs provided better veterinary care for their pets and took better care regarding the food offered to them.

Only 9 (0.75%; 95% CI: 0.34% - 1.4%) of the 1194 serum samples examined were reactive regarding anti-N. caninum. Another study carried out on dogs from the same municipality by Gennari et al. (2002)Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SNR, Cardoso SMS, Kwok OCH, Jenkins MC, et al. Occurrence of Neospora caninum antibodies in sera from dogs of the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2002; 106(2): 177-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00052-3. PMid:12031819.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)...
, which included both domiciled dogs (n = 500) and stray dogs (n = 600) dogs, found much higher values: respectively 10% and 25%. However, the diagnostic method used was the Neospora agglutination test (NAT > 25), which therefore makes it difficult to compare the results.

The values of antibody titers against N. caninum ranged from 50 to 800, and 200 was the most frequent titer. Immune Fluorescent Reaction is the test most used to search for antibodies against this coccidium, and the dilution cutoff point of 1:50 is recommended for this. This cutoff point was used in 55 of the 68 studies on the occurrence of N. caninum among dogs in Brazil. This test and cutoff point are considered standard for this species [reviewed by Cerqueira-Cézar et al. (2017)Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Calero-Bernal R, Dubey JP, Gennari SM. All about neosporosis in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2017; 26(3): 253-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017045. PMid:28876360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017...
].

In Brazil, a series of studies carried out on dogs to search for antibodies against N. caninum found higher prevalence than those observed in the present study, ranging from 3.1% to 67.6% (Cerqueira-Cézar et al., 2017Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Calero-Bernal R, Dubey JP, Gennari SM. All about neosporosis in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2017; 26(3): 253-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017045. PMid:28876360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017...
). Dogs from urban environments showed lower occurrence rates than those from rural or semi-rural environments. This indicated that urban dogs had fewer opportunities for contact with the infective forms of the parasite, which are usually present in aborted bovine fetuses, fetal membranes, carcasses and prey (Mineo et al., 2004Mineo TWP, Silva DAO, Näslund K, Björkman C, Uggla A, Mineo JR. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum serological status of different canine populations from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2004; 56(3): 414-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352004000300022.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352004...
; Fridlund-Plugge et al., 2008Fridlund-Plugge N, Montiani-Ferreira F, Richartz RRTB, Dal Pizzol J, Machado PC Jr, Patrício LFL, et al. Frequency of antibodies against Neospora caninum in stray and domiciled dogs from urban, periurban and rural areas from Paraná State, Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(4): 222-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000400010. PMid:19265582.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008...
; Cunha et al., 2008Cunha NA Fo, Lucas AS, Pappen FG, Ragozo AM, Gennari SM, Lucia T Jr. Risk factors and prevalence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum in urban and rural dogs from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(Suppl 1): 301-306. PMid:20059865.; Moraes et al., 2008Moraes CCG, Megid J, Pituco EM, Okuda LH, Del Fava C, Stefano E, et al. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum in dogs of Botucatu range Micro region, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(1): 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000100001. PMid:18554432.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008...
; Valadas et al., 2010Valadas S, Minervino AHH, Lima VMF, Soares RM, Ortolani EL, Gennari SM. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum, anti-Toxoplasma gondii, and anti-Leishmania chagasi in serum of dogs from Pará State, Amazon, Brazil. Parasitol Res 2010; 107(2): 453-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1890-2. PMid:20445991.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-189...
; Sousa et al., 2012Sousa ME, Porto WJN, Albuquerque PPF, Souza OL No, Pinheiro JW Jr, Mota RA. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in dogs in the state of Alagoas, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2012; 21(3): 287-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000300019. PMid:23070441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012...
; Sicupira et al., 2012Sicupira PML, Magalhães VCS, Galvão GS, Pereira MJS, Gondim LFP, Munhoz AD. Factors associated with infection by Neospora caninum in dogs in Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2012; 185(2-4): 305-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.029. PMid:22015062.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011....
; Bruhn et al., 2012Bruhn FRP, Figueiredo VC, Andrade GS, Costa-Júnior LM, Rocha CMBM, Guimarães AM. Occurrence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs in rural areas in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2012; 21(2): 161-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000200017. PMid:22832759.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012...
; Raimundo et al., 2015Raimundo JM, Guimarães A, Moraes LMB, Santos LA, Nepomuceno LL, Barbosa SM, et al. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs from the state of Tocantins: serology and associated factors. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(4): 475-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015068. PMid:26689184.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015...
). According to the information obtained through the epidemiological questionnaire, all the dogs sampled only frequented urban environments.

Due to the low prevalence observed, no statistical analysis on the findings regarding N. caninum was carried out. Thus, the results are only presented descriptively. However, despite the low prevalence, positive dogs were found in all regions: both males and females and with and without defined breed. None of the dogs younger than one year old had antibodies against N. caninum, and seven of the nine positive dogs were older than eight years of age, thus indicating, in the same way shown earlier regarding T. gondii, that the prevalence increased with increasing age of the animals. Other studies carried out in Brazil and in other countries have also observed higher prevalence among older animals (Andreotti et al., 2004Andreotti R, Pinckney RD, Pires PP, Silva EA. Evidence of Neospora caninum in beef cattle and dogs in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Center-Western region, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(3): 129-131.; Oliveira et al., 2004Oliveira JM, Matos MFC, Oshiro LM, Andreotti R. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs in the urban area of Campo Grande, MS. Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(4): 155-158.; Capelli et al., 2004Capelli G, Nardelli S, Regalbono AF, Scala A, Pietrobelli M. Sero-epidemiological survey of Neospora caninum infection in dogs in north-eastern Italy. Vet Parasitol 2004; 123(3-4): 143-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.012. PMid:15325040.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004....
).

None of the dogs that were seropositive for N. caninum were described as having any neurological problems in the records made by the veterinarians who had attended them. Studies on dogs carried out in various parts of the world have shown that although the serum prevalence of antibodies in dogs can be relatively high, clinical disease is relatively rare. Little is known about why some dogs develop clinical symptoms and others do not. This might be due to differences in the virulence of isolates, or due to differences in host susceptibility, or both factors could be involved. Clinical symptoms of neosporosis are usually observed in very young, very old or immunosuppressed dogs (Dubey et al., 2017Dubey JP, Hemphill A, Calero-Bernal R, Schares G. Neosporosis in animals. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561...
).

From the results of the present study, it can be concluded that in all zones of the metropolitan region of São Paulo, there are domestic dogs that are positive for IgG anti-T. gondii antibodies, with less occurrence in the western region. The risk factors for T. gondii infection were age (such that older dogs were more reactive) and mixed breed.

The prevalence of anti-N. caninum was less than 1%, but positive dogs were detected in all areas of the municipality.

  • How to cite: Santos EZ, Soares HS, Santos SR, Moraes Filho J, Pena HFJ, Amaku M, et al. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum antibody seroprevalence and risk factors among dogs treated at Public Veterinary Hospitals in São Paulo, Brazil. Braz J Vet Parasitol 2023; 32(4): e008723. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612023058

References

  • Aguiar DM, Amude AM, Santos LGF, Ribeiro MG, Ueno TEH, Megid J, et al. Canine distemper virus and Toxoplasma gondii co-infection in dogs with neurological signs. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2012; 64(1): 221-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000100032
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352012000100032
  • Andreotti R, Pinckney RD, Pires PP, Silva EA. Evidence of Neospora caninum in beef cattle and dogs in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul, Center-Western region, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(3): 129-131.
  • Arruda IF, Millar PR, Barbosa AS, Abboud LCS, Reis IC, Moreira ASC, et al. Toxoplasma gondii in domiciled dogs and cats in urban areas of Brazil: risk factors and spatial distribution. Parasite 2021; 28: 56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021049 PMid:34236311.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021049
  • Associação Brasileira da Indústria de Produtos para Animais de Estimação – ABINPET. Mercado [online]. São Paulo: ABINPET. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 19]. Available from: http://abinpet.org.br/mercado
    » http://abinpet.org.br/mercado
  • Benitez AN, Gonçalves DD, Nino BSL, Caldart ET, Freire RL, Navarro IT. Seroepidemiology of toxoplasmosis in humans and dogs from a small municipality in Parana, Brazil. Cienc Anim Bras 2017; 18: e4102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v18e-42102
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1089-6891v18e-42102
  • Brito AF, Souza LC, Silva AV, Langoni H. Epidemiological and serological aspects in canine toxoplasmosis in animals with nervous symptoms. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2002; 97(1): 31-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762002000100003 PMid:11992143.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762002000100003
  • Bruhn FRP, Figueiredo VC, Andrade GS, Costa-Júnior LM, Rocha CMBM, Guimarães AM. Occurrence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs in rural areas in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2012; 21(2): 161-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000200017 PMid:22832759.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000200017
  • Calero-Bernal R, Gennari SM. Clinical toxoplasmosis in dogs and cats: an update. Front Vet Sci 2019; 6: 54. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00054 PMid:30863754.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00054
  • Camargo ME. Introdução às técnicas de imunofluorescência. Rev Bras Patol Clin 1974; 10: 143-169.
  • Capelli G, Nardelli S, Regalbono AF, Scala A, Pietrobelli M. Sero-epidemiological survey of Neospora caninum infection in dogs in north-eastern Italy. Vet Parasitol 2004; 123(3-4): 143-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.012 PMid:15325040.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.06.012
  • Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Calero-Bernal R, Dubey JP, Gennari SM. All about neosporosis in Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2017; 26(3): 253-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017045 PMid:28876360.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612017045
  • Cunha NA Fo, Lucas AS, Pappen FG, Ragozo AM, Gennari SM, Lucia T Jr. Risk factors and prevalence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum in urban and rural dogs from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(Suppl 1): 301-306. PMid:20059865.
  • Dantas SBA, Fernandes ARF, Souza OL No, Mota RA, Alves CJ, Azevedo SS. Ocorrência e fatores de risco associados às infecções por Toxoplasma gondii e Neospora caninum em cães no município de Natal, Estado do Rio Grande do Norte, Nordeste do Brasil. Cienc Rural 2013; 43(11): 2042-2048. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013001100020
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-84782013001100020
  • Duarte PO, Oshiro LM, Zimmermann NP, Csordas BG, Dourado DM, Barros JC, et al. Serological and molecular detection of Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii in human umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 9043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1 PMid:32493968.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-65991-1
  • Dubey JP, Gennari SM, Sundar N, Vianna MCB, Bandini LM, Yai LEO, et al. Diverse and atypical genotypes identified in Toxoplasma gondii from dogs in São Paulo, Brazil. J Parasitol 2007; 93(1): 60-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1 PMid:17436942.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1645/GE-972R.1
  • Dubey JP, Hattel AL, Lindsay DS, Topper MJ. Neonatal Neospora caninum infection in dogs: isolation of the causative agent and experimental transmission. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 193(10): 1259-1263. PMid:3144521.
  • Dubey JP, Hemphill A, Calero-Bernal R, Schares G. Neosporosis in animals Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315152561
  • Dubey JP, Jenkins MC, Rajendran C, Miska K, Ferreira LR, Martins J, et al. Gray wolf (Canis lupus) is a natural definitive host for Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 2011; 181(2-4): 382-387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018 PMid:21640485.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.05.018
  • Dubey JP, Jones JL. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int J Parasitol 2008; 38(11): 1257-1278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.007 PMid:18508057.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.03.007
  • Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL. Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology 2012; 139(11): 1375-1424. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765 PMid:22776427.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182012000765
  • Dubey JP, Murata FHA, Cerqueira-Cézar CK, Kwok OCH, Yang Y, Su C. Toxoplasma gondii infections in dogs: 2009-2020. Vet Parasitol 2020; 287: 109223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109223 PMid:33160144.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109223
  • Dubey JP. Toxoplasmosis of animals and humans 2nd ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420092370
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420092370
  • Etheredge GD, Michael G, Muehlenbein MP, Frenkel JK. The roles of cats and dogs in the transmission of Toxoplasma infection in Kuna and Embera children in eastern Panama. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2004; 16(3): 176-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892004000900004 PMid:15507185.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1020-49892004000900004
  • Frenkel JK, Lindsay DS, Parker BB, Dobesh M. Dogs as possible mechanical carriers of Toxoplasma, and their fur as a source of infection of young children. Int J Infect Dis 2003; 7(4): 292-293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1201-9712(03)90112-3 PMid:14656424.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1201-9712(03)90112-3
  • Fridlund-Plugge N, Montiani-Ferreira F, Richartz RRTB, Dal Pizzol J, Machado PC Jr, Patrício LFL, et al. Frequency of antibodies against Neospora caninum in stray and domiciled dogs from urban, periurban and rural areas from Paraná State, Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(4): 222-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000400010 PMid:19265582.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000400010
  • Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SNR, Cardoso SMS, Kwok OCH, Jenkins MC, et al. Occurrence of Neospora caninum antibodies in sera from dogs of the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2002; 106(2): 177-179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00052-3 PMid:12031819.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(02)00052-3
  • Gondim LFP, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE. Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2004; 34(2): 159-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001 PMid:15037103.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2004.01.001
  • Guimarães AM, Rocha CMBM, Oliveira TMFS, Rosado IR, Morais LG, Santos RRD. Fatores associados à soropositividade para Babesia, Toxoplasma, Neospora e Leishmania em cães atendidos em nove clínicas veterinárias do município de Lavras, MG. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009;18(Suppl S1): 49-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009 PMid:20040191.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.018e1009
  • JASP Team. JASP: a fresh way to do statistics [software]. Amsterdam: The JASP Team; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 20]. Available from: https://jasp-stats.org
    » https://jasp-stats.org
  • King JS, Slapeta J, Jenkins DJ, Al-Qassab SE, Ellis JT, Windsor PA. Australian dingoes are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2010; 40(8): 945-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008 PMid:20149793.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.01.008
  • Kolören Z, Dubey JP. A review of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Turkey. Parasitology 2020; 147(1): 12-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019001318 PMid:31554526.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0031182019001318
  • Langoni H, Fornazari F, Silva RC, Monti ET, Villa FB. Prevalence of antibodies against Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs. Braz J Microbiol 2013; 44(4): 1327-1330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000400043 PMid:24688530.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822013000400043
  • Langoni H, Matteucci G, Medici B, Camossi LG, Richini-Pereira VB, Silva RC. Detection and molecular analysis of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum from dogs with neurological disorders. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2012; 45(3): 365-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012000300016 PMid:22760137.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0037-86822012000300016
  • Lindsay DS, Dubey JP, Butler JM, Blagburn BL. Mechanical transmission of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by dogs. Vet Parasitol 1997; 73(1-2): 27-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00048-4 PMid:9477489.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(97)00048-4
  • Lobato J, Silva DAO, Mineo TWP, Amaral JDHF, Silva GR Segundo, Costa-Cruz JM, et al. Detection of immunoglobulin G antibodies to Neospora caninum in humans: high seropositivity rates in patients who are infected by human immunodeficiency virus or have neurological disorders. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2006; 13(1): 84-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006 PMid:16426004.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/CVI.13.1.84-89.2006
  • McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM. Rapid communication: dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1998; 28(9): 1473-1478. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00138-6 PMid:9770635.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(98)00138-6
  • Meireles LR, Galisteo AJ Jr, Pompeu E, Andrade HF Jr. Toxoplasma gondii spreading in an urban area evaluated by seroprevalence in free-living cats and dogs. Trop Med Int Health 2004; 9(8): 876-881. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01280.x PMid:15303992.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01280.x
  • Mineo TWP, Silva DAO, Näslund K, Björkman C, Uggla A, Mineo JR. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum serological status of different canine populations from Uberlândia, Minas Gerais. Arq Bras Med Vet Zootec 2004; 56(3): 414-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352004000300022
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-09352004000300022
  • Montoya JG, Liesenfeld O. Toxoplasmosis. Lancet 2004; 363(9425): 1965-1976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X PMid:15194258.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16412-X
  • Moraes CCG, Megid J, Pituco EM, Okuda LH, Del Fava C, Stefano E, et al. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum in dogs of Botucatu range Micro region, State of São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2008; 17(1): 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000100001 PMid:18554432.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612008000100001
  • Moura AB, Souza AP, Sartor AA, Bellato V, Teixeira EB, Pisetta GMP, et al. Ocorrência de anticorpos e fatores de risco para infecção por Toxoplasma gondii em cães, nas cidades de Lages e Balneário Camboriú, Santa Catarina, Brasil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2009; 18(3): 52-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009 PMid:19772776.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.4322/rbpv.01803009
  • Munoz J, Mayer DCG. Toxoplasma gondii and Giardia duodenalis infections in domestic dogs in New York City public parks. Vet J 2016; 211: 97-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.015 PMid:26988633.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.02.015
  • Murat JB, Hidalgo HF, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Pelloux H. Human toxoplasmosis: which biological diagnostic tests are best suited to which clinical situations? Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2013; 11(9): 943-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2013.825441 PMid:24053275.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/14787210.2013.825441
  • Navarro GCB. A proteção aos animais e a ampliação do enfoque das políticas públicas: o caso dos hospitais públicos veterinários. INTERthesis 2015; 12(1): 84-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p84
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1807-1384.2015v12n1p84
  • Olbera AVG, Fornazari F, Babboni SD, Rossi RS, Sevá AP, Latosinski GS, et al. Cumulative incidence and spatial distribution of dogs exposed to Toxoplasma gondii. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2020; 29(2): e000820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020025 PMid:32490893.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020025
  • Oliveira GMS, Simões JM, Schaer RE, Freire SM, Nascimento RJM, Pinheiro AMCM, et al. Frequency and factors associated with Toxoplasma gondii infection in pregnant women and their pets in Ilhéus, Bahia, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2019; 52: e20190250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0250-2019 PMid:31800920.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0250-2019
  • Oliveira JM, Matos MFC, Oshiro LM, Andreotti R. Prevalence of anti-Neospora caninum antibodies in dogs in the urban area of Campo Grande, MS. Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2004; 13(4): 155-158.
  • Oshiro LM, Motta-Castro ARC, Freitas SZ, Cunha RC, Dittrich RL, Meirelles ACF, et al. Neospora caninum and Toxoplasma gondii serodiagnosis in human immunodeficiency virus carriers. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2015; 48(5): 568-572. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015 PMid:26516966.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0151-2015
  • Paulan SC, Lins AGS, Tenório MS, Silva DT, Pena HFJ, Machado RZ, et al. Seroprevalence rates of antibodies against Leishmania infantum and other protozoan and rickettsial parasites in dogs. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2013; 22(1): 162-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013000100031 PMid:24252965.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612013000100031
  • R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing [software]. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2022 [cited 2023 Feb 19]. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
    » https://www.R-project.org/
  • Raimundo JM, Guimarães A, Moraes LMB, Santos LA, Nepomuceno LL, Barbosa SM, et al. Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in dogs from the state of Tocantins: serology and associated factors. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(4): 475-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015068 PMid:26689184.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015068
  • Schares G, Pantchev N, Barutzki D, Heydorn AO, Bauer C, Conraths FJ. Oocysts of Neospora caninum, Hammondia heydorni, Toxoplasma gondii and Hammondia hammondi in faeces collected from dogs in Germany. Int J Parasitol 2005; 35(14): 1525-1537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.008 PMid:16197949.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.008
  • Seabra NM, Pereira VF, Kuwassaki MV, Benassi JC, Oliveira TMF. Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Leishmania spp. serology and Leishmania spp. PCR in dogs from Pirassununga, SP. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2015; 24(4): 454-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015046 PMid:26689180.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612015046
  • Sevá AP, Chiebao DP, Brandão APD, Godoy SN, Jimenez-Villegas T, Pena HFJ, et al. Seroprevalence and incidence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum infection in naturally exposed domestic dogs from a rural area of São Paulo state, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2020; 29(3): e008820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020053 PMid:33027425.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1984-29612020053
  • Sicupira PML, Magalhães VCS, Galvão GS, Pereira MJS, Gondim LFP, Munhoz AD. Factors associated with infection by Neospora caninum in dogs in Brazil. Vet Parasitol 2012; 185(2-4): 305-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.029 PMid:22015062.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.029
  • Silva RC, Souza LC, Langoni H, Tanaka EM, Lima VY, Silva AV. Risk factors and presence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in dogs from the coast of São Paulo State, Brazil. Pesq Vet Bras 2010; 30(2): 161-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010000200011
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-736X2010000200011
  • Sousa ME, Porto WJN, Albuquerque PPF, Souza OL No, Pinheiro JW Jr, Mota RA. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Neospora caninum in dogs in the state of Alagoas, Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2012; 21(3): 287-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000300019 PMid:23070441.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612012000300019
  • Souza SLP, Gennari SM, Yai LEO, D’Auria SRN, Cardoso SMS, Guimarães JS Jr, et al. Occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in sera from dogs of the urban and rural areas from Brazil. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 2003; 12(1): 1-3.
  • Strital AD, Igarashi M, Muraro LS, Aguiar DM, Pacheco TA, Garcia JL, et al. Estudo epidemiológico e avaliação de fatores de risco da infecção por Toxoplasma gondii e achados clinico-patológicos da infecção aguda em cães admitidos em um Hospital Escola Veterinário. Pesq Vet Bras 2016; 36(10): 993-998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016001000012
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-736x2016001000012
  • Valadas S, Minervino AHH, Lima VMF, Soares RM, Ortolani EL, Gennari SM. Occurrence of antibodies anti-Neospora caninum, anti-Toxoplasma gondii, and anti-Leishmania chagasi in serum of dogs from Pará State, Amazon, Brazil. Parasitol Res 2010; 107(2): 453-457. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1890-2 PMid:20445991.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-010-1890-2
  • Zanette MF, Lima VMF, Laurenti MD, Rossi CN, Vides JP, Vieira RFC, et al. Serological cross-reactivity of Trypanosoma cruzi, Ehrlichia canis, Toxoplasma gondii, Neospora caninum and Babesia canis to Leishmania infantum chagasi tests in dogs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 2014; 47(1): 105-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1723-2013 PMid:24603745.
    » http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-1723-2013

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    10 Nov 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    25 May 2023
  • Accepted
    27 July 2023
Colégio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinária FCAV/UNESP - Departamento de Patologia Veterinária, Via de acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane s/n, Zona Rural, , 14884-900 Jaboticabal - SP, Brasil, Fone: (16) 3209-7100 RAMAL 7934 - Jaboticabal - SP - Brazil
E-mail: cbpv_rbpv.fcav@unesp.br