## Services on Demand

## Journal

## Article

## Indicators

- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics

## Related links

- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google

## Share

## Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications

##
*On-line version* ISSN 2179-1074

### J. Microw. Optoelectron. Electromagn. Appl. vol.10 no.1 São Caetano do Sul June 2011

#### http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2179-10742011000100019

**SELECT PAPERS FROM MOMAG 2010**

**Control strategies applied for reducing the vibration and torque ripple of a special Switched Reluctance Motor**

**D. A. P. Correa ^{I}; W. M. da Silva^{I}; S. I. Nabeta^{II}; I. E. Chabu^{II}**

^{I}Centro Tecnológico da Marinha em São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2468, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CTMSP2, CEP 05508-000, __dapcorrea@yahoo.com.br__, __wmarinho@usp.br __

^{II}Escola Politécnica da USP, Av.Prof. Luciano Gualberto, tr.3, 158, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, CEP05508-900,

__nabeta@pea.usp.br__,

__ichabu@pea.usp.br__

**ABSTRACT**

Despite its robustness the Switched Reluctance Motors (SRMs) present some inconvenient drawbacks as a major torque ripple, vibration and acoustic noise when compared to other types of motors. These characteristics are usually related to factors such as the salient poles in the stator and in the rotor, the switched feeding and the control strategy imposed by the electronic converter. In this paper a Special Switched Reluctance Motor for fractional horsepower and high speed hand tool was studied in order to minimize its vibration and torque ripple characteristics. This task was accomplished by the development of a simple and flexible motor drive and the combination of two different commutations strategies: the Three Level Control and the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current. The SRM prototype and its drive were constructed and submitted to several tests with the proposed commutation strategies. In the frequency domain the strategies results were considered satisfactory.

**Index Terms-** Control Strategies, Switched Reluctance Motor, Torque Ripple, Vibration.

**I.** **INTRODUCTION**

The Switched Reluctance Motors (SRMs) present a simple manufacturing characteristic associated to robustness, reliability and speed when compared to other equivalent machines. However these machines also present some inconvenient features like non negligible vibration, torque ripple and acoustic noise. These characteristics are related to factors as rotor and stator double salient poles geometry, switched drive feeding and control strategy established for the power converter.

Regarding the vibration, it can be classified into mechanical and magnetic origins [1]. The vibrations of magnetic origin are due to the fluctuations of magnetic forces inside the motor [2], [3]. These forces can be divided in two components, radial and tangential magnetic forces. The radial components are related to the attraction forces between rotor and stator poles. On the other hand the tangential components are related to the torque produced between rotor and stator salient poles. The focus of this work is minimizing the torque ripple produced by the tangential components of force and the vibrations associate with it.

There are basically two methods for reducing the torque ripple and the vibrations in the SRM: improve the motor's magnetic design and apply sophisticated control strategies in the SRM drive [4], [5]. The SRM considered in this work presents a special geometry, depicted in *Fig.1*, which was obtained through an optimization procedure based on a Multi-Objective method [6] that aimed the torque ripple, and consequently the vibration, reduction. In order to further reduce the torque ripple, this work proposes the assemblage of a dedicated hardware and software for implementing the aforementioned strategies.

For this purpose, the motor drive hardware used an AC three-phase power module [7], which brought more simplicity and flexibility to the application. The software is based on a LabView [8] serial data interface for handling the motor drive parameters like turn-on, turn-off and dwell firing angles, etc so as to find the best operation point at nominal conditions. Besides, a control software based on a C code was developed using a DSP development kit [9] aiming the control and commutation algorithms.

**II. SWITCHED RELUCTANCE MOTOR DRIVE - THE HARDWARE STRUCTURE**

In order to simplify the development of the application, the motor drive assignment was divided into three main blocks: motor, converter and controller [10].

*A. Motor*

The 4:2 poles - 2 phases Switched Reluctance Motor was proposed as a drive for a fractional horsepower and high speed hand tool [11]. The SRM has particularly designed rotor poles which ensure an appropriate unidirectional starting torque at any rotor position. The basic characteristic of the rotor poles is its geometric asymmetry that consists of one region with a small uniform air-gap and another with a variable air-gap which increases toward the quadrature axis, like showed in *Fig. 2*.

Applying the Finite Element Method (FEM) associated with a numerical approach based on Simulated Annealing (SA) and Kriging Method [12], the torque ripple was minimized.

Generally, the minimization of the torque ripple implies in the degradation of other important features, such as the starting and the average torques. To overcome this, the use of a multi-objective optimization technique resulted in the reduction of the torque ripple and the raise of the starting torque while keeping the average torque at his former value [6]. The most significant geometric parameters chosen for the rotor optimization were β0, lg1 and lg2 (*Fig. 2*) and the rotor with its new dimensions, hereafter designated as "optimized" is depicted in *Fig. 3(b)*.

*B. Converter*

The Power Electronic Converter is basically composed of a capacitive filter for the DC bus, the gate drive circuits and an inverter circuit that performs the commutation of the IGBT power switches. The DC capacitive filter must be composed of a hundred microfarad capacitor because of the high level of the SRM phase current harmonics. To implement the gate drive circuit it was used the boot strap technology associated with a pulse transformer.

As the control strategies are directly related to the power converter hardware, it was proposed a Power Electronic Converter that uses AC three-phase power modules (IRAMS10UP60B) [7] assembled in two configurations. In the first assembly (A) only one power module connected to both the SRM windings was used, as showed in *Fig. 4*. In the second assembly (B), two power modules were used, each one independently connected to one winding. This configuration is known as asymmetric half-bridge converter. The usage of this AC three-phase power module brings the following advantages: less connections, reliability and less electromagnetic interference.

*C. Controller*

The controller is based on the DSP development kit (eZdsp LF2407A) [9]. The choice of the DSP controller is justified by the requirements of high frequency bandwidth and accuracy. The DSP controller tasks include the commutation of the inverter IGBT switches, commands generation, the processing of control algorithms, the data communication and the supervising of variables. Moreover, it was necessary to implement a LabView algorithm for loading the input parameters (the angles θ* _{on}*, θ

*and θ*

_{off}*for example) and for finding the optimal operation point related to the vibration. Once the parameters were loaded in the graphic interface, they were sent to the DSP board that executed the desired commutation profile.*

_{c}

**III. THE CONTROL AND COMMUTATION STRATEGIES**

SRMs operating in high speed have a limited processing time to execute the SRM control instructions and a high *back-emf* that disable the implementation of switched control techniques in the motor phases. Thus, to overcome these limitations, this work proposes the combination of control and commutation strategies. These strategies were tested in open loop control mode in order to estimate the vibration conditions in the SRM and not to correct the error through the control. It was proposed two control techniques to minimize the vibration and torque ripple of SRM operating at nominal conditions, as presented in the sequence.

*A. Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Currents*

This strategy is based on the work developed by Schramm [13] and proposes the establishment of a phase current overlapping to minimize the current peak per phase which minimizes, consequently, the vibration and the torque ripple in the SRM. In order to implement this strategy, firstly the torque, current and phase inductance vs. rotor angular position for both rotors (reference and optimized) were obtained experimentally. Analyzing these curves, the initial value of the turn-on angle (θ* _{on}*) and the dwell angle (θ

*) were obtained. Thence, it was established a trial and error procedure to provide the best values for these angles regarding the minimal vibration.*

_{c}To carry these tests out it was considered relative values of vibration, thus the values obtained with the Single Pulse strategy were used as reference in the comparison with the values obtained with the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Currents strategy. The following values were reached: θ* _{on}* = 45° and θ

_{c}= 100° with a overlapping of 10°.

*Figs. 5, 6, 7 and 8*present the phase currents, the DSP command signals and the optical sensors signals waveforms for the SRM operating with the two strategies: the Single Pulse and the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Currents.

*Figs. 5 and 6* display the results of these strategies with the reference rotor and it is observed that the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current strategy presented a current deep reduction between two consecutive phase current pulses of 13% in relation to the Single Pulse strategy. While in the *Figs. 7 and 8* are shown the results with the optimized rotor, where the current deep reduction is 14%. In spite of the representative results obtained with this method, there are difficulties to find the best value of the angles through the try-and-error process. Moreover, to implement that strategy it is necessary a more accurate positioning sensor and a more elaborated converter with flexibility to impose the commutation strategies with overlapping phase current. The Power Electronic Converter was assembled as in the configuration (B) and the DSP command signals were implemented in negative logic due to the utilization of the IRAMS10UP60B power module.

*B. Three Level Control*

This strategy is based on a work initiated by Hedlund *apud* Rasmussen [10] and proposes the SRM control by the application of three different commutations states during the same pole-pitch as showed in *Fig. 9*. The commutation states are defined as a different voltage level which must be applied to a distinct angular interval. The main characteristic of this commutation strategy is that it is not switched, so it can be applied in high speed and at nominal condition of operation. According to Hedlund, this strategy reduces the vibration and the acoustic noise effects since it reduces the high current transient that occurs during the application of the reverse voltage in the SRM phases which induces high magnitude in the first vibration mode. In *Fig. 9* it is illustrated the phase current, the voltage and the ideal inductance waveforms with the SRM operating in the Three Level Control strategy. Furthermore, in the same figure it is shown the details of the three angular intervals (θ* _{1}*, θ

*θ*

_{2}e*) and the three voltage levels (+v, zero e -v) necessaries to the application. Again, for obtaining the best angular intervals (θ*

_{3}*, θ*

_{1}*θ*

_{2}e*), trial and error tests were performed and the following angular intervals were determined: θ*

_{3}*= 45°, θ*

_{on}*= 90°, θ*

_{1}*= 20° and θ*

_{2}*= 70°. Like the last case, it was considered relative values and the Single Pulse strategy was used as reference.*

_{3}

The vibration levels with both strategies and both rotors are presented in *Figs. 14 and 15* on section IV. In *Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13* it is shown the phase voltage, the phase current, the DSP Command signals and the optical sensor signals waveforms of the SRM operating in Single Pulse strategy and in the Three Level Control strategy. *Figs. 10 and 11* show the results of these strategies obtained with the reference rotor, while in the *Figs. 12 and 13* are shown the results with the optimized one.

Comparing the *Figs. 10, 11, 12 and 13* it can be noted that, for both rotor types, the Three Level Control strategy presents a minor current slope. The current slope occurs during the application of reverse voltage in the SRM phases and its reduction results in smaller vibration as shown in the section IV. Despite the good results there are disadvantages related to the hard and stressful work to find the angular intervals. Moreover, this strategy needs a more accurate rotor position sensor. As before, the DSP command signals were implemented in negative logic, thus the DSP output signals are active in zero logic level.

**IV. RESULTS**

To accomplish the experimental tests a piezoelectric accelerometer sensor was connected in the SRM stator outer case. The accelerometer sensor signal was fed into the amplifier and the conditioning module (Charge Amplifier). The output voltage signal from the Charge Amplifier was fed into the Dynamic Signal Analyzer to carry out the signal treatment in the frequency domain. The vibration experimental results were obtained in frequency domain for the reference rotor and for the optimized one. In the tests it was not considered absolute values of vibration, but relative ones.

The Single Pulse strategy was used as reference in the comparisons with the other two proposed strategies. It was noticed that at the nominal rotor speed, 100 Hz or 6000 rpm, the main component of the torque ripple frequency was 400 Hz (four times the rotor frequency) due to the number of stator poles. Considering the experimental tests carried out with the reference rotor, in *Fig. 14* it was observed the application of two different commutation strategies to minimize the torque ripple and vibration at nominal conditions: Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current and Three Level Control. Comparing these strategies one can conclude that the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current strategy presents a vibration reduction of 23% at torque ripple frequency, while the Three Level Control strategy presents a vibration reduction of approximately 24%.

In *Fig. 15* the vibration results were compared for two different strategies applied to the optimized rotor at nominal conditions (torque and speed). The Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current strategy presents a vibration reduction of 41%, while the Three Level Control strategy presents a vibration reduction of 45%.

Comparing the *Figs. 14 and 15* one can observe a drastic attenuation in the vibration magnitude due to the rotor optimization. Although the rotor optimization provided a substantial vibration reduction the proposed control strategies contributed for a further reduction.

In *Fig. 16* it is compared the vibration results for the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current and the Three Level Control and it can be seen that the last one provided a reduction in the vibration magnitude for all frequency spectrum.

*Fig. 17* depicts the comparison between the Single Pulse and the Three Level Control. Like the last case, it was noticed a reduction of vibration in all frequency spectrum. Comparing the *Figs. 16 and 17* it was observed that the Three Level Control strategy presents the best results in the vibration reduction.

In order to verify the influence of the control strategies in the efficiency of the motor drive, it was implemented some tests with the SRM driven by the three strategies (Single Pulse, Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current and Three Level Control).

The Single Pulse Control Strategy setup also was used as a reference in the efficiency tests. The Table I resume the efficiency results obtained in these tests. In spite of the representative results of vibration obtained (45% of reduction), the optimized rotor associated with the Three Level Control Strategy setup presented a minor efficiency (65.95%). This value is approximately 3% lower than that obtained with the Single Pulse Control Strategy setup (69.33%).

Similarly, the optimized rotor associated with the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current Control Strategy setup (vibration reduction of 41%) presented almost the same efficiency (66.12%).

Thus, the efficiency results revels that the control strategies used in the motor drive cause low losses of efficiency (3%) when compared to the vibration reduction levels reached.

In Table I, the power input (P_{in}) is defined as the power provided by D.C. Power Supply connected to the power electronic converter input; and the (P_{out}) is defined as the mechanical power available in the motor shaft at nominal conditions of operation.

**V. CONCLUSIONS**

The SRMs present major vibration, torque ripple and acoustic noise characteristics. Moreover, when operating in high speed and nominal conditions, they have a limited processing time to execute their control instructions and a high *back-emf* that disable the implementation of switched control techniques in the motor phases. Thus, this work proposed two control and commutation strategies that produce less vibration and torque ripple in the SRM: the Three Level Control and the Single Pulse with Overlapping Phase Current both implemented in open loop control mode.

In order to implement these commutation strategies it was assembled a dedicated digital setup composed of a development kit (eZdsp LF2407A), a serial control interface developed on a LabView application and a simple Power Electronic Converter (IRAMS10UP60B).

Comparing the experimental results, it was observed that the vibration and torque ripple problem must be analyzed under two aspects: mechanical and electronic. The mechanical improvements, related to the geometrical optimization of the rotor poles, resulted in a reduction of 75% in the vibration. Additionally, the electronic implementation, the Three Level Control, provided more 45% vibration reduction in the final results.

To verify the influence of the control strategies on the efficiency, several tests were carried out in the nominal condition. The results indicate that the control strategies proposed in this work caused minor reductions in the efficiency of the motor drive when compared to the reached vibration reduction levels.

**ACKNOWLEDGMENT**

The authors acknowledge J. Sanches and F. Junqueira for technical support in the vibration tests, L. Buzo for the figures edition, A. Tosin for helping us with the technical and manuscript review and finally the support of the CTMSP.

**REFERENCES**

[1] P. Pillay, W. Cai, "An Investigation into Vibration in the Switched Reluctance Motor", *IEEE Trans. Industry Applic.*, vol.35, nº 3, pp. 589-596, May/June 1999. [ Links ]

[2] N. Sadowski, Y. Lefèvre, C. G. C. Neves, R. Carlson, "Finite Elements Coupled to Electrical Circuit Equations in the Simulation of Switched Reluctance Drives: Attention to Mechanical Behavior", *IEEE Trans. Magnetics*, vol.32, nº 3, pp. 1086-1089, May 1996. [ Links ]

[3] C. G. C. Neves, R. Carlson, N. Sadowski, J. P. A. Bastos, N. S. Soeiro, S. N. Y. Gerges, "Vibrational Behavior of Switched Reluctance Motors by Simulation and Experimental Procedures", *IEEE Trans. Magnetics*, vol. 34, nº 5, pp. 3158-3161, Sep. 1998. [ Links ]

[4] R. S. Wallace, D. G. Taylor, "A Balanced Commutator for Switched Reluctance Motors to Reduce Torque Ripple", *IEEE Trans. Power Electron.*, vol. 7, nº 4, pp. 617-626, Oct. 1992. [ Links ]

[5] I. Husain, "Minimization of Torque Ripple in SRM Drives", *IEEE Trans. Industrial Electron.*, vol. 49, nº 1, pp. 28-39, Feb. 2002. [ Links ]

[6] S. I. Nabeta, I. E. Chabu, L. Lebensztajn, D. A. P. Correa, W. M. da Silva, et al., "Mitigation of the Torque Ripple of a Switched Reluctance Motor through a Multi-Objective Optimization", *IEEE Trans. Magnetics,* v. 44, nº 4, pp. 411-414, Apr. 2008. [ Links ]

[7] Data sheet, International Rectifier, *IRAMS10UP60B*, Jul. 2005. [ Links ]

[8] LabView Software v. 7.0. [ Links ]

[9] Technical Reference, Spectrum Digital, *eZdsp LF2407A*, Dec. 2000; [ Links ]

[10] P. O. Rasmussen, "Design and Advanced Control of Switched Reluctance Motors", Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Denmark, 2002. [ Links ]

[11] I. E. Chabu, S. I. Nabeta, J. R. Cardoso, "Design Aspects Of 4:2 Pole-2 Phase Switched Reluctance Motors", *Proceedings of the IEEE-IEMDC'99*, v. 1, p. 63-65, 1999. [ Links ]

[12] L. Lebensztajn, et al., "Kriging: a useful tool to electromagnetic devices optimization", *IEEE Trans. Magnetics*, vol. 40, nº 2, pp. 1196-1199, Mar. 2004. [ Links ]

[13] D. S. Schramm, B. W. Williams, T. C. Green, "Torque ripple reduction of Switched Reluctance Motors by Phase Current Optimal Profiling", *PESC*, pp.857-860, 1992. [ Links ]