SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 issue1Preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery: an update of systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro)

Print version ISSN 2237-9363

J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.32 no.1 Rio de Janeiro Jan./Mar. 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2237-93632012000100001 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

Efficacy of topical imiquimod in HIV-positive patients with recurrent anal condylomata acuminata

 

 

Sidney Roberto NadalI; Carmen Ruth ManzioneII; Fernanda Bellotti FormigaIII; Sérgio Henrique Couto HortaII; Victor Edmond SeidII

ITeam supervisor at the Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas - São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIProctologist at the Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas - São Paulo (SP), Brazil
IIITrainee at the Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas - São Paulo (SP), Brazil

Correspondence to

 

 


ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Imiquimod is a topical chemotherapic and immunostimulant agent with antitumoral and antiviral activities, used for anal condylomata acuminata treatment, mainly in recurrences.
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the imiquimod efficiency in chronic and recurrent anal condylomata acuminata in HIV-infected persons.
METHOD: A prospective study that analyzed 61 patients with recurrent anal condylomata treated with topic 5% imiquimod, for at least 8 weeks. These patients had already been submitted to other topical and surgical treatments for anal warts. We evaluated the efficiency of this agent, through wart remission, with clinical examination and high-resolution anoscopy, CD4+ T lymphocyte count and side effects. The patients were 55 males and 6 females, from 22 to 63 years old.
RESULTS: Remission was seen in 90%, being 46% complete remission and 44% partial remission. Other 10% did not respond to the treatment with imiquimod within the 16th week. Recurrences were observed in 11% of patients in 24-week follow-up. Statistics showed no differences in CD4+ T cell scores when groups with and without complete remission were compared. Adverse effects were reported by 45% of patients. They were mild to moderate burning (25%), intense burning (7%), ulcerative dermatitis (8%) and systemic symptoms (5%).
CONCLUSION: Imiquimod was effective in controlling recurrent anal condylomata acuminata in HIV-positive patients, regardless of CD4+ T cell count.

Keywords: papillomavirus infections; condylomata acuminata; immunotherapy.


RESUMO

INTRODUÇÃO: O imiquimode é agente tópico quimioterápico e imunoestimulante, com atividades antitumoral e antiviral, usado para tratamento dos condilomas acuminados perianais, principalmente os recidivantes.
OBJETIVO: Avaliar a eficácia do imiquimode nos condilomas acuminados perianais crônicos e multirrecidivantes dos doentes soropositivos para o vírus da imunodeficiência adquirida (HIV).
CASUÍSTICA E MÉTODO: Estudo clínico prospectivo por 12 meses em que observamos o uso tópico de imiquimode creme 5%, por no mínimo 8 semanas, em 61 portadores de condilomas acuminados perianais recidivantes e de difícil controle, e que já haviam sido submetidos a vários outros tratamentos clínicos e operatórios. Avaliamos a eficácia do produto quanto sua remissão (através de exame clínico e colposcópico), nível dos linfócitos T CD4+ e efeitos adversos. Foram 55 homens e 6 mulheres com idade entre 22 e 63 anos.
RESULTADOS: Obtivemos 90% de remissão, sendo 46% de resposta completa, 44% de resposta parcial e 10% sem qualquer resposta em até 16 semanas de tratamento com imiquimode. A taxa de recidiva atingiu 11% em 24 semanas de seguimento. Quanto ao nível de linfócitos T CD4+, não observamos diferença estatística entre o grupo que atingiu remissão completa e o grupo que manteve lesões. Efeitos adversos foram relatados por 45% dos doentes, sendo ardor leve a moderado (25%), ardor intenso (7%), dermatite ulcerativa (8%) e efeitos sistêmicos (5%).
CONCLUSÃO: O imiquimode foi efetivo no controle dos condilomas acuminados perianais recidivantes dos doentes HIV-positivo, independente da contagem sérica dos linfócitos T CD4+.

Palavras-chave: infecções pelo papilomavírus; condiloma acuminado; imunoterapia.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is today one of the sexually transmissible agents of highest prevalence worldwide1 and the most common in the perianal region2-5. More than 50% of all sexually active people are infected with HPV6; but most of them are asymptomatic, and only 10% present verrucous lesions, papilomata or dysplasias3,7-9. The anus is the extragenital site more frequently affected by HPV, and the most aggressive and recurrent disease occurs in patients that contract the disease through the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)3,8-14.

Among the several treatments for condylomata acuminata, the most frequent are ablative topical drugs (podophillin, trichloroacetic acid and podophyllotoxin), surgical procedures (with electrocautery, laser, infrared coagulation, cryotherapy and surgical excision) and immunotherapy (imiquimod and cidofovir).

Imiquimod, an imidazoquinoline (1-[2-methylpropyl)-1H-imidazole-[4,5-c]-quinoline-4-amine), is a chemotherapic and immunostimulant agent with antitumoral and antiviral activities12,15. It acts as an immunomodulator, due to the activity of toll-like receptor agonists on monocytes, macrophages and dendritic cells, activating the innate and cellular (Th1) immunity by inducing pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interferon alpha, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukins 1, 6, 8 and 12. In addition, it induces apoptosis and activates lymphocytes B, boosting the immunological response to cells altered by HPV8,16-23.

Although the literature mentions that imiquimod promotes reduced incidence of recurrence, prolonged disease-free survival and qualitative and quantitative virus reduction12,15,24-26, the studies presented some faults, as most of them are not prospective or randomized. In addition, they analyzed small samples, which were mixed in terms of the individual's immunocompetence, they omit the patient's prior treatments, they do not mention the lesion locations and involve short follow-up period. On the other hand, the cost is higher and the short-time effectiveness as the first-line treatment, is similar to that of cheaper topical drugs27.

These doubts led to the proposal of this study, which evaluated the effectiveness of imiquimod in chronic and multi-recurrent perianal condylomata acuminata of HIV-positive patients.

 

CASE AND METHOD

That was a 12-month prospective clinical study, in which imiquimod 5% cream, topical use, was prescribed to 75 patients with recurrent perianal condylomata acuminata of difficult control, who had already been submitted to several other clinical and surgical treatments.

The study excluded from the initial sample ten patients that did not return for follow-up, three patients that did not use the product as prescribed and one patient who dropped out due to perianal discomfort. Then, the study included 61 patients who received care during the year of 2008, who used imiquimod for at least eight weeks and who accepted to be submitted to the study, signed an informed consent term and rigorously came to our outpatient clinic observing the follow-up period. The patients were 55 males and 6 females, mean age 40 years old, ranging from 22 to 63 years old.

The drug was applied (after medical instruction) at home, digitally, to the entire anal canal, by the patient or accompanying people. An envelope (250 mg) was used three times a week, on alternate days, for eight weeks.

The product effectiveness was evaluated 15 days after the end of the treatment, through a complete proctological exam, including anal colposcopy (high-resolution anuscopy) and anal canal scrape cytology, in those patients that did not present macroscopic lesions. For this exam, we used the conventional colposcopy and applied 5% acetic acid and iodinated solution to identify the residual subclinical lesions. Those with persistent disease, either macroscopically or microscopically, received the drug for other eight weeks and were again submitted to clinical evaluation, colposcopy and scrape cytology 15 days after the end of the treatment.

In the product effectiveness evaluation, the study considered remission or complete response when no clinical or subclinical lesions were present, and remission or partial response when the clinical disease was reduced to half the initial involvement. Those with continued manifestations or reduced by 50% were considered as without remission or no response.

We evaluated again all patients with complete remission through proctologic exams and colposcope and acetic acid, six month after the end of the treatment. We considered as recurrence when the patient presented macroscopic or microscopic lesions after complete remission. We studied about the adverse effects of the product.

Finally, we compared the group with complete remission to the others, including partial remission and no response, regarding CD4+ T lymphocyte count.

The Student's t-test was used in the statistical analysis of the study.

 

RESULTS

After 8-week treatment, we observed 33% (20 cases) of complete remission, 51% (31 cases) of partial remission and 16% (10 cases) of patients without remission. When including the patients that used the product for 16 weeks, we have: 46% (28 cases) of complete response, 44% (27 cases) of partial response and 10% (6 cases) without response.

The recurrence rate in those patients with complete response was 11% (3 cases), 2 of them used imiquimod for 8 weeks and presented recurrence within 16 and 24 weeks, and one used it for 16 weeks and presented new lesions within 24 weeks.

Regarding the serum level of CD4+ T lymphocytes, no statistically significant difference was observed, using the Student's t-test (p=0.110), between the group with complete remission after 16-week treatment (mean level of CD4+ T lymphocytes: 398 cells/mm3) and the group that remained with lesions (324 cells/mm3).

Adverse effects were reported by 45% of the patients. The most frequent were mild to moderate burning (25%), intense burning (7%), ulcerative dermatitis (8%) and systemic symptoms (5%). The systemic effects in our sample occurred in two patients. One reported symptoms of flu syndrome and one presented erythema nodosum on the right leg.

 

DISCUSSION

The literature shows conflicts regarding the best therapy for anal condylomata acuminata, with some authors indicating topical substances as the first-line method8,28-31 and others, the surgical ablation32-34. Our study showed better results when we started with the topical treatment (podophyllin 25% below the pectineal line and trichloroacetic acid 95% above this line), with 50% of complete remission and two-fold disease-free survival when comparing it to ablative techniques29. The recurrence rate was reduced from 76% with the ablative treatment to 51% with the topical treatment29, placing the surgery as a second-line treatment option in our service.

We indicated the topical treatment even in case of large lesions, as we observed that it promotes reduction of lesions, enabling easier surgical treatment subsequently, when required, eliminating the coexisting subclinical disease, and the postoperative pain8,9,35 and extending the disease-free survival9,29.

When comparing studies that use ablative techniques to those that use imiquimod, as the first-line treatment option, a longer disease-free survival was observed with the imiquimod; 45 to 79% recurrences with surgical procedures36,37 and 65% with infrared38,39, while only 26 to 29% was observed with the use of imiquimod15,40.

Controlled studies showed the same effectiveness of podophyllin and imiquimod when evaluating healing rates, but the latter involved higher costs41. We opted for imiquimod to patients with multi-recurrent lesions8,35 to promote better local immunity and enable recurrence control.

While some studies prescribed imiquimod to HIV-positive patients for the treatment of subclinical lesions to reduce the viral load of HPV15, others did not show statistical significance versus placebo, despite their small sample42. Our study, on the other hand, showed good effectiveness of the product, although it was only indicated to multi-recurrent condylomata acuminata in HIV-positive patients.

The permanent HPV infection is due to repeated sexual contact, virus location far from lymphatic tissues, deep or forgotten lesions, latent form of the virus, long incubation period of HPV and alteration to the local immunity8,43. There is no evidence that the condylomata acuminata treatment will eliminate the viral infection (latent form), but that it may eliminate its clinical form (macroscopic lesion) and subclinical form (microscopic lesion), reducing the patient's infectivity degree. Some studies with imiquimod showed qualitative reduction (decrease in more virulent strains) and quantitative reduction (decrease in the number of coexisting infectious types) different from the other forms of treatment12,15,44,45.

In our sample, we observed 90% of remission, with complete remission in 46% after 16-week treatment with imiquimod. Recurrences occurred in 11% of the patients, up to 6 months of follow-up. These numbers agree with the literature, which shows remission between 74 and 84%, with complete remission between 25 and 77% of the patients12,15,40,45,46.

It is interesting to point out that we obtained 33% of complete response after 8-week treatment, which occurred in 46% after 16-week treatment, determining gains over one third. All patients with complete remission after an additional 8-week treatment, except for one case, presented partial response in the initial treatment. It suggests that extending the treatment to 16 weeks benefits especially those patients with partial remission in the initial treatment.

Some studies with immunocompetent patients with HPV caused by anal and genital contact, showed 50 to 64% of complete response in the 16-week treatment with imiquimod and recurrence rate of 13%, as well as 28% of adverse effects, such as local erythema and superficial cutaneous ulcerations43-45. On the other hand, another study comparing immunocompetent to immunodepressed patients showed a remission rate of 62% in the first group and 31% in the second, with higher recurrence rate in the second46.

A prospective study with HIV-positive patients using imiquimod as first-line treatment observed 77% complete remission, with 26% recurrence in the long term (mean follow-up of 20.6 months)12,15. In this study, as the patients were typified according to their viral DNA, the authors observed 58% of new lesions in non-treated sites, which shows a high number of patients with either new or recurrent lesions at the end of the follow-up period12. We criticize such differentiation (new and recurrent lesion), as, in fact, the strains coexist and, sometimes some viral types show clinical lesion and sometimes other types do. This differentiation collaborated to a rate of complete remission in this study much above the mean value of the studies in the literature, including our finding.

In our study, the patients with recurrent lesions showed statistical significance regarding the levels of CD4+ T lymphocytes, unlike the patients who presented new lesions12,15. However, neither the lesion location (anal canal or margin), nor the dysplasia degree influenced the response12.

Another study that analyzed a higher number of HIV-positive patients found the same rate of complete remission as ours (46%), in a 20-week treatment with imiquimod, with higher recurrence rate (29%), but with a longer follow-up period40, suggesting that we should follow our patients for a longer period to obtain the true recurrence rate. In fact, we have followed up the patients whose lesions were eradicated, each six months, with anal colposcopy and oncotic cytology of the anal canal and, after three negative exams, once a year. However, most patients with recurrent lesions, have it within 12 months.

Although the literature shows evidence that serum levels of CD4+ below 200/mm3 are associated with higher recurrence rates36,45, our study did not show statistical difference regarding the level of CD4+ between the group with complete remission and the others. Another study conducted by our team with imiquimod observed no statistical significance between the response and the level of CD4+, nor between the side effects46. Other authors also found similar results to ours, i.e., no association with CD4+ or viral load40. This result is expected, as most of the studied sample (72%) presented CD4+ counts above 200 cells/mm3, like most studies that have been published. It occurs because today, the patients that seek services to treat anal condilomatosis have the lesion caused by HIV infection, which is controlled with antiretroviral (ARV) drugs, and without systemic opportunistic diseases. The impact of ARVs on the prevention and control of opportunistic diseases is known; but the impact is different in HPV infection47.

Regarding the adverse effects, they were reported by 45% of the patients, but most of them presented only mild to moderate burning (25%), which many times is not considered an adverse effect by the literature, as it is the expected response in these cases. Local erythema occurred in all patients submitted to the treatment12, which is not necessarily a complaint of the patient. Ulcerative dermatitis corresponded to 8% of the adverse effects and the flu syndrome to 3%. The study also observed erythema nodosum on the leg of one of our patients. Such findings confirm with the literature, which reports 50% of adverse effects - 32% of ulcerative dermatitis and 18% of flu syndrome2,15, values much higher than those found in our study.

 

CONCLUSION

Imiquimod was effective in the remission of recurrent perianal condylomata acuminata in HIV-positive patients.

 

REFERENCES

1. Magi JC, Brito SEM, Grecco ETO, Pereira SMM, Formiga GJS. Prevalência de papilomavírus humano (HPV) anal, genital e oral, em ambulatório geral de coloproctologia. Rev Bras Coloproct 2006;26(3):233-8.         [ Links ]

2. Nadal SR, Calore EE, Nadal LRM, Horta SHC, Manzione CR. Citologia anal para rastreamento de lesões pré-neoplásicas. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2007;53(2):147-51.         [ Links ]

3. Manzione CR, Nadal SR, Calore EE. Oncogenicidade do papilomavírus humano e o grau de neoplasia intra-epitelial anal em doentes HIV positivo. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2004;50(3):282-5.         [ Links ]

4. Calore EE, Manzione CR, Nadal SR, Cavalieri MJ, Calore NMP, Santos RP. Ki-67 expression in anal intraepithelial neoplasia in AIDS. São Paulo Med J 2001;119(3):119-21.         [ Links ]

5. Nadal SR, Manzione CR, Horta SHC. Comparison of perianal diseases in HIV-positive patients in periods before and after HAART use. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51(10):1491-4.         [ Links ]

6. Manhart LE, Koutsky LA. Do condoms prevent genital HPV infection, external genital warts, or cervical neoplasia? A meta-analysis. Sex Transm Dis 2002;29(11):725-35.         [ Links ]

7. Wexner SD, Smithy WB, Milson JW, Dailey TH. The surgical management of anorectal diseases in AIDS and pre-AIDS patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34:299-304.         [ Links ]

8. Nadal SR, Manzione CR, Horta SHC, Calore EE. Sistematização do atendimento dos portadores de infecção perianal pelo papilomavirus humano (HPV). Rev bras Coloproct 2004;24(4):322-8.         [ Links ]

9. Manzione CR, Nadal SR, Calore EE. Postoperative follow-up of anal condylomata acuminata in HIV-positive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46(10):1358-65.         [ Links ]

10. Abramowitz L, Benabderrahmane D, Ravaud P, Walker F, Rioux C, Jestin C, et al. Anal squamous intraepithelial lesions and condyloma in HIV-infected heterosexual men, homosexual men and women: prevalence and associated factors. AIDS 2007;21(11):1457-65.         [ Links ]

11. Kojic EM, Cu-Uvin S. Update: human papillomavirus infection remains highly prevalent and persistent among HIV-infected individuals. Curr Opin Oncol 2007;19(5):464-9.         [ Links ]

12. Wieland U, Brockmeyer NH, Weissenborn SJ, Hochdorfer B, Stücker M, Swoboda J, et al. Imiquimod treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-positive men. Arch Dermatol 2006;142(11):1438-44.         [ Links ]

13. Pineda CE, Berry JM, Jay N, Palefsky JM, Welton ML. High resolution anoscopy in the planned staged treatment of anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative patients. J Gastrointest Surg 2007;11(11):1410-6.         [ Links ]

14. Goldstone SE, Hundert JS, Huyeth JW. Infrared coagulation ablation of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions in HIV-negative males who have sex with males. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50(5):567-75.         [ Links ]

15. Kreuter A, Potthoff A, Brockmeyer NH, Gambichler T, Stücker M, Altemeyer P, et al. Imiquimod leads to a decrease of human papillomavirus DNA and to a sustained clearance of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in HIV-infected men. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128(8):2078-83.         [ Links ]

16. Gupta AK, Browne M, Bluhm R. Imiquimod: a review. J Cutan Med Surg 2002;6(6):554-60.         [ Links ]

17. Pehoushek J, Smith KJ. Imiquimod and 5% fluorouracil therapy for anal and perianal squamous cell carcinoma in situ in an HIV-1 positive man. Arch Dermatol 2001;137(1):14-6.         [ Links ]

18. Hengge UR, Borchard C, Esser S, Schroder M, Mirmohammadsadegh A, Goss M. Lymphocytes proliferative in blood and lymph nodes following interleukin-2 therapy in addition to highly active antiretroviral therapy. AIDS 2002;16(2):151-60.         [ Links ]

19. Hengge UR, Ruzicka T. Topical immunomodulation on in dermatology potential of toll-like receptor agonists. Dermatol Surg 2004;30(8):1101-12.         [ Links ]

20. Garland SM. Imiquimod. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2003;16(2):85-9.         [ Links ]

21. Hengge UR, Benninghoff B, Ruzicka T, Gooss M. Topical immunomodulators - progress towards treating inflammation, infection, and cancer. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1(3):189-98.         [ Links ]

22. McInturff JE, Modlin RL, Kim J. The role of toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis and treatment of dermatological disease. J Invest Dermatol 2005;125(1):1-8.         [ Links ]

23. Meyer T, Nindl I, Schmook T, Ulrich C, Sterry W, Stockfleth E. Induction of apoptosis by toll-like receptor-7 agonist in tissue cultures. Br J Dermatol 2003;149(Suppl 66):9-14.         [ Links ]

24. Sanclemente G, Herrera S, Tyring SK, Rady PL, Zuleta JJ, Correa LA, et al. Human papillomavirus (HPV) viral load and HPV type in the clinical outcome of HIV-positive patients treated with imiquimod for anogenital warts and anal intraepithelial neoplasia. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2007;21(8):1054-60.         [ Links ]

25. Kreuter A, Wieland U, Gambichler T, Altmeyer P, Pfister H, Tenner-Racz K, et al. p16ink4a expression decreases during imiquimod treatment of anal intraepithelial neoplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected men and correlates with the decline of lesional high-risk human papillomavirus DNA load. Br J Dermatol 2007;157(3):523-30.         [ Links ]

26. Kreuter A, Brockmeyer NH, Weissenborn SJ, Wafaisade A, Pfister H, Altmeyer P, et al. 5% imiquimod suppositories decrease the DNA load of intra-anal HPV types 6 and 11 in HIV-infected men after surgical ablation of condylomata acuminata. Arch Dermatol 2006;142(2):243-4.         [ Links ]

27. Goldstone SE, Kawalek AZ, Huyett JW. Infrared coagulation: a useful toll of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48(5):1042-54.         [ Links ]

28. Pincinato AL, Horta SHC, Ramacciotti Filho PR, Formiga GJS. Recidiva de lesões associadas ao HPV em pacientes HIV positivos após tratamento cirúrgico. Rev bras Coloproct 2009;29(2):169-73.         [ Links ]

29. Nadal SR, Manzione CR, Horta SHC, Galvão VM. Tratamento tópico dos condilomas acuminados perianais em doentes HIV-positivos. Rev bras Coloproct 1999;19:79-82.         [ Links ]

30. Safavi A, Gottesman L, Dailey TH. Norectal surgery in the HIV+ patient: update. Dis Colon Rectum 1991;34(4):299-304.         [ Links ]

31. Morgan AR, Miles AJ, Wastell C. Anal warts and squamous carcinoma in situ of the anal canal. J R Soc Med 1994;87(1):15.         [ Links ]

32. Miles AJG, Mellor CH, Gazzard B, Allen-Mersh TG, Wastell C. Surgical management of anorectal disease in HIV-positive homosexuals. Br J Surg 1990;77(8):869-71.         [ Links ]

33. Beck DE, Jaso RG, Zajak RA. Surgical management of anal condylomata acuminata in the HIV-positive patient. Dis Colon Rectum 1990;33(3):180-3.         [ Links ]

34. Weiss EG, Wexner SD. Surgery for anal lesions in HIV-infected patients. Ann Med 1995;27(4):467-75.         [ Links ]

35. Nadal SR, Manzione CR. Doente portador de condiloma acuminado perianal recidivante: o que fazer? Rev Assoc Med Bras 2001;47(4):278-9.         [ Links ]

36. Chang GJ, Berry JM, Jay N, Palefsky JM, Welton ML. Surgical treatment of high-grade anal squamous intraepithelial lesions: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45(4):453-8.         [ Links ]

37. Pineda CE, Berry JM, Jay N, Palefsky JM, Welton ML. High-resolution anoscopy targeted surgical destruction of anal high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51(6):829-35.         [ Links ]

38. Cranston RD, Hirschowitz SL, Cortina G, Moe AA. A retrospective clinical study of the treatment of high-grade anal dysplasia by infrared coagulation in a population of HIV-positive men who have sex with men. Int J STD AIDS 2008;19(2):118-20.         [ Links ]

39. Williams P, Von Krogh G. The cost-effectiveness of patient-applied treatments for anogenital warts. Int J STD AIDS 2003;14(4):228-34.         [ Links ]

40. Pelletier F, Drobacheff-Thiebaut C, Aubin F, Venier AG, Mougin C, Laurent R. Effects of imiquimod on latent human papillomavirus anal infection in HIV-infected patients. Ann Dermatol Venereol 2004;131(11):947-51.         [ Links ]

41. De la Fuente SG, Ludwig KA, Mantyh CR. Preoperative immune status determines anal condyloma recurrence after surgical excision. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46(3):367-72.         [ Links ]

42. Nadal SR, Nadal LRM, Horta SR, Manzione CR. Efeitos da contagem sérica dos linfócitos T CD4+ na eficácia do imiquimode nos condilomas anais recidivantes de doentes HIV-positivo. Rev bras Coloproct 2006;26(Suppl):41.         [ Links ]

43. Senatori R, Dionisi B, Lippa P, Inghirami P. Topical imiquimod cream in the treatment of external anogenital warts: personal experience. Minerva Ginecol 2003;55(6):541-6.         [ Links ]

44. Arican O, Guneri F, Bilgic K, Karaoglu A. Topical imiquimod 5% cream in external anogenital warts: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J Dermatol 2004;31(8):627-31.         [ Links ]

45. Brady S, Wilson JD. Closing the feedback loop: an audit of the use of imiquimod for the treatment of genital warts. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2004;18(3):314-7.         [ Links ]

46. Cusini M, Salmaso F, Zerboni R, Carminati G, Vernaci C, Franchi C, et al. 5% imiquimod cream for external anogenital warts in HIV-infected patients under HAART therapy. Int J STD AIDS 2004;15(1):17-20.         [ Links ]

47. Palefsky JM, Holly EA, Efirdc JT, Da Costa M, Jay N, Berry JM, et al. Anal intraepithelial neoplasia in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era among HIV-positive men who have sex with men. AIDS 2005;2(19):1407-14.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence to:
Sidney Roberto Nadal
Rua Dr. Virgilio de Carvalho Pinto, 381, apto. 23, Pinheiros
CEP: 05415-030 - São Paulo (SP), Brazil
E-mail: srnadal@terra.com.br

Submitted on: 07/20/2011
Approved on: 09/06/2011
Financing source: none.
Conflict of interest: nothing to declare.

 

 

Study carried out at the Technical Team of Proctology at the Instituto de Infectologia Emílio Ribas - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.