Print version ISSN 2237-9363
J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.32 no.1 Rio de Janeiro Jan./Mar. 2012
Bruna Luz Custódio CamargoI; Thaísa Consorte DominguesI; Vanessa Miguel NijiI; Gisele Alborghetti NaiII
IAcademician in Medical Sciences, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE) - Presidente Prudente (SP), Brazil
IIDoctor in Pathology; Professor of the Department of Pathology, Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE) - Presidente Prudente (SP), Brazil
Intestinal adenomas are benign neoplasms that present a risk of malignancy associated with three independent characteristics: the polyp size, the histological architecture and the severity of epithelial dysplasia (or atypia). Current evidence suggests that mast cells (CM) contribute to the tumorigenesis of colorectal carcinomas. Objective: Compare the concentration of CM in intestinal adenomas and risk criteria for malignancy in these tumors (size, histological type and degree of cellular atypia).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study with 102 anatomopathological reports of intestinal adenoma excision. We selected paraffin blocks with the central area of the tumor. The CM were stained with toluidine blue.
RESULTS: In most cases (89.2%, n=91), the mast cells concentration (MC) was less than 6 CM/10 high power field (HPF) (p=0.0001). Most adenomas, regardless of their histological type, showed 0 CM/10 HPF (p=0.083). In most adenomas, regardless of their size, MC was 0 CM/10 HPF (p=0.665). Presence or absence of atypia was associated, in most cases, with MC of 0 CM/10 HPF (p=0.524). Conclusion: This study did not show association between the MC and histological type, size or presence of atypical cells in intestinal adenomas.
Keywords: mast cell; adenoma; intestinal cancer; histology; pathology.
Adenomas intestinais são neoplasias benignas que apresentam risco de malignização relacionado a três características independentes: o tamanho do pólipo, a arquitetura histológica e a gravidade da displasia (ou atipia) epitelial. Evidências atuais sugerem que os mastócitos contribuem para a tumorigênese do carcinoma colorretal.
OBJETIVO: Analisar comparativamente a concentração de mastócitos em adenomas intestinais e os critérios de risco para malignização nesses tumores (tamanho, tipo histológico e grau de atipia celular). Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo retrospectivo, com seleção de 102 laudos anatomopatológicos de exérese de adenoma intestinal. Foram selecionados os blocos de parafina com a área central da neoplasia para a realização da coloração de azul de toluidina para evidenciar os mastócitos.
RESULTADOS: Na maioria dos casos (89,2%, n=91) a concentração de mastócitos (CM) foi menor que 6 mastócitos/10 campos de grande aumento (CGA) (p=0,0001). A maioria dos adenomas, independente do tipo histológico, mostrou 0 mastócito/10 CGA (p=0,083). A maioria dos adenomas, independentemente do tamanho, tinha CM de 0 mastócito/10 CGA (p=0,665). A presença ou a ausência de atipias esteve associada, na maioria dos casos, a CM de 0 mastócito/10 CGA (p=0,524).
CONCLUSÃO: Este estudo não mostrou associação entre a concentração de mastócitos e tipo histológico, tamanho ou presença de atipias celulares nos adenomas intestinais.
Palavras-chave: mastócito; adenoma; câncer intestinal; histologia; patologia.
In terms of incidence, colorectal cancer is the third most frequent cause of cancer in the world, in both genders, and the second cause in developed countries. Around 9.4% of all cancers are colorectal cancer, corresponding to one million new cases1. The estimated number of new cases of colorectal cancer in Brazil in 2010 was 13,310 cases in men and 14,800 in women. These values correspond to the estimated risk of 14 new cases in each 100,000 men and 15 new cases in each 100,000 women1.
The family history of colorectal cancer and the genetic predisposition to developing chronic bowel disease (such as APC) are the most important risk factor for the development of this type of neoplasm1,2.
The early detection of colorectal adenomatous polyps (precursors of colorectal cancer) and local cancers is possible through the fecal occult blood test and endoscopic methods1. The natural history of colorectal cancer enables ideal conditions for its early detection. However, even countries with abundant resources have had difficulties in performing diagnostic assessments using endoscopic exams in patients with the presence of fecal occult blood, not allowing the population screening. The purpose of this strategy is not to diagnose more polyps or more flat lesions, but reduce the incidence and mortality of this type of cancer in the target population1.
Mast cells (CM) were described infiltrating the interface between developing tumors and healthy tissues in 1891 by Westphal, a student of Paul Erlich (apud3,4). CM are common in several human cancers, including carcinoma of Merkel cells, breast, lung, skin and Hodgkin's lymphoma5. Some studies suggest that CM can promote tumor growth in some types of cancers, but opposed results in others6,7.
Several studies have evaluated the association between CM and colorectal cancer, showing greater concentration of CM in tumors when compared to adjacent healthy tissues3, high level of metalloproteinase (MMP) of CM in normal tissue adjacent to tumor8, significant correlation between MC and microvascular density9, greater concentration of CM in poorly differentiated tumors, but no correlation with invasion depth10, longer survival in patients with lower concentration of CM and lower vascular density9,11 and better prognosis in patients with lower concentration of CM in the tumor12.
The study conducted by Gounaris et al.13 showed a MC in adenomatous polyps (lymphocyte-independent), which is required for polyp formation, the initial step for colon cancer.
Understanding the mechanisms that lead to neoplasm aggressiveness is important when trying to institute more effective therapeutic methods that mainly prevent its local infiltration and systemic dissemination. In this context, the tumor microenvironment plays an important role, and knowing possible differences in the microenvironment of cancer-precursor lesions is essential.
The literature does not have studies that compare MC to risk criteria for malign transformation into intestinal adenomas.
Based on that, the purpose of this study was to compare MC in intestinal adenomas and the risk criteria for malignancy in these tumors (size, histological type and degree of cellular atypia).
Selection of cases
A retrospective study was conducted, with the selection of 102 anatomopathological reports of intestinal adenoma excision made by the Laboratory of Pathological Anatomy at the Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE), between January 2005 and August 2009.
The cases of intestinal adenoma incision biopsy were excluded, as they are performed for the preoperative diagnosis of lesions, but do not allow to assess the lesion size.
Data related to patients' gender, adenoma size, histological type (tubular, tubulovillous and villous), presence and degree of cellular atypia (absent, mild, moderate and severe) and presence of associated lesion in another bowel area and, if present, what lesion was found, were obtained from the exam reports. Then, the adenomas were sorted according to their size into the following categories: adenomas smaller than 1.0 cm, 1.0-1.9 cm, 2.0-2.9 cm, 3.0-3.9 cm and 4 cm or larger.
The evaluation of histological parameters (histological type and atypia) was made by the same pathologist (GAN).
Determination of mast cell concentration
Paraffin blocks with the central area of the tumor were selected for CM staining with toluidine blue (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to evidence the CM, as determined by Michalany14. The CM count of each plate was made in the adenoma stroma, with 10 HPF (objective lens 40×), which corresponds to around 1 mm2, using an optical microscope. Regardless of the adenoma size, all of them presented a proportional quantity of stroma.
The MC was sorted into five categories: 0 CM in 10 HPF; 1 to 5; 6 to 15; 16 to 25; and more than 25.
The quantitative variables were primarily tested to verify the adequacy to normal distribution, through the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and, as they did not present normal distribution, non-parametrical tests were used. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the histological type and cellular atypia in the adenomas to the patients' age; the histological type to the adenoma size; the adenoma size to cellular atypia; and the MC to the histological type of adenomas and cellular atypia. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare the adenoma size to the patients' gender, the adenoma size to the presence or absence of adenoma-related lesions and the MC to the presence or absence of adenoma-related lesions. The Spearman correlation was used to verify the association between the MC and the adenoma size and the patients' age, and the association between the patients' age and the adenoma size. The Χ2 test was used to compare the histological type of adenomas to cellular atypia; and the patients' gender and the histological type to the presence or absence of associated lesions. The likelihood ratio was used to compare the histological type to cellular atypia and cellular atypia to the presence or absence of adenoma-related lesions, as in the Χ2 test, 20% or more of boxes presented expected frequencies lower than 5. All tests were made considering the significance level of 5% using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 15.0.
Approval from the Research Ethics Committee
This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Universidade do Oeste Paulista (CEP/UNOESTE - Process n° 584/10).
The patients' age varied between 22 and 94 years, mean age was 63.96 years (standard deviation of 13.27 years and median value of 66 years), and 56.9% of them were males.
Regarding the histological type, 39.2% (n=40) were tubular adenomas, 42.1% (n=43) were tubulovillous adenomas and 18.7% (n=19) were villous adenomas. The adenoma size ranged from 0.20 to 4.50 cm in the greatest axis (mean of 1.29 cm, standard deviation of 0.84 cm and median of 1.00 cm), with most cases (81.3%, n=83) measuring less than 2 cm and only two cases measuring 4 cm or more. Regarding cellular atypia, 22.5% (n=22) had no atypia, 37.2% mild atypia, 29.4% (n=30) moderate atypia and 10.9% (n=11) had severe atypia.
A statistically significant difference was observed between the histological type of adenomas and the patients' gender (p=0.019), with tubular and tubulovillous types more frequent in women, and also in relation to age (p=0.025). No statistically significant difference was observed between cellular atypia and the patients' gender (p=0.495) or the patients' age (p=0.241). Regarding the adenoma size, a difference was observed in relation to the patients' gender (p=0.035), but not in relation to the patients' age (p=0.555).
Most cases did not present other associated lesions in the bowel (78.4%, n=80). Nineteen cases were associated with adenocarcinoma (18%) and three (2.9%) with hyperplastic polyp.
Most tubular adenomas measured less than 2 cm (92.5%, n=37) and presented mild atypia (45%, n=18) or no atypia (35%, n=14). Tubulovillous adenomas measured between 1.0-1.9 cm in 48.8% of the cases (n=21) and presented moderate atypia in 34% (n=15) of the cases. The two adenomas measuring 4 cm or more were tubulovillous and presented mild and moderate atypia. Only one villous adenoma measured between 3.0-3.9 cm, the others measured up to 1.9 cm and most of them presented mild (42.1%, n=8) or moderate atypia (42.1%, n=8) (Figure 1). A statistically significant difference was observed between the histological type of adenomas and the size (p=0.0001) and cellular atypia (p=0.007) of the adenomas.
When comparing the size to cellular atypia, most cases of all categories presented mild atypia (p=0.414).
Regarding the associated lesions, adenocarcinoma was associated with tubular adenomas in most cases (68.4%, n=13), adenomas smaller than 1 cm (57.9%, n=11) e absence of atypia (36.8%, n=7). One case associated with adenocarcinoma and 10 without associated lesions (12.5%) presented severe atypia. A statistically significant difference was observed between associated lesions and histological type of adenomas (p=0.019) and size (p=0.016), but no difference was observed in relation to cellular atypia (p=0.51) of adenomas.
The MC ranged from 0 to 28 CM/10 HPF (mean was 2.28, standard deviation of 4.57 and median was 1) (p=0.0001) (Figures 1 and 2). No statistically significant difference was observed between the MC and the patients' age (p=0.790) and gender (p>0.05).
The comparisons between mast cell concentration and histological type (p=0.083), size (p=0.665) and cellular atypia (p=0.524) of adenomas and the presence of associated lesions (p=0.202) are illustrated in Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6, respectively.
Intestinal polyps can be non-neoplastic (inflammatory, hamartomatous or hyperplastic) and neoplastic (adenomatous polyps or adenomas). Adenomas can be of three types, according to their histological architecture: 1) tubular adenomas, composed of tubular glands similar to the mucosa topology, are the most frequent types; 2) villous adenomas, with villous projections, corresponding to 1% of the adenomas; 3) tubulovillous adenomas, a combination of the two types described above, corresponding to 5 to 10% of the adenomas15. In this study, most cases of intestinal adenomas occurred in male patients, with median age of 66 years, as described in the literature. However, tubulovillous adenomas were predominant (42.1%), followed by tubular adenomas (39.2%). The median size was 1 cm and mild atypia predominated in the studied sample (29.4%). Such data show that the adenomas had early diagnosis, reducing the risk of malignancy of these tumors.
In this study, the histological type of adenomas was associated with the patients' gender and age, while the adenoma size was associated with gender only, and cellular atypia was not associated with either parameter. In addition, a statistically significant difference was observed between the histological type and size (p=0.0001) of adenomas and histological type and cellular atypia (p=0.007), but no association was observed between the adenoma size and cellular atypia (p=0.414). The absence of association observed between adenoma size and cellular atypia may be explained by the fact that most cases had adenomas measuring up to 1.9 cm, with moderate and severe cellular atypia as the most frequent types observed in adenomas larger than 2 cm15. On the other hand, most cases had tubular and tubulovillous adenomas, which tend to be smaller and with lower degree of cellular atypia15, which predominated in this study.
The risk of malignancy for an adenoma is associated with three independent characteristics: polyp size, histological architecture and epithelial dysplasia (or atypia) severity, described as follows: 1) cancer is rare in tubular adenomas with diameter of less than 1 cm; 2) the probability of cancer is high in villous adenomas with diameter of more than 4 cm, reaching up to 40%; 3) severe dysplasia, when present, is frequently found in villous areas15. This study showed a statistically significant difference between the presence of associated lesions and the histological type of adenomas (p=0.019) and adenoma size (p=0.016), partially confirming the data above, as no association was observed between these other lesions and the degree of cellular atypia of the adenomas (p=0.51). This fact may have occurred due to the small number of adenocarcinomas (18%) in the sample of associated lesions, as well as the small number of adenomas with severe atypia (10.9%), which are more associated with the progress into malign neoplasm.
The role of stroma-epithelium interaction in the initial events of carcinogenesis was proposed around 30 years ago6. An interaction between tumor cells and their microenvironment is important for their growth and survival. In this context, the involvement of inflammatory cells in the initiation, promotion and progression of cancer has indicated a new therapeutic opportunity in the treatment of cancer. The main immune cells involved in tumor-associated inflammation are macrophages, dendritic cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils and CM16.
CM are metachromatic cells from hematopoietic pluripotent stem cells of the bone marrow17, first described by Erlich, in 18783,4. The CM can be found in most tissues, but are found in greater number in the skin, airways and digestive tract4. The study conducted by McGinnis et al.18 showed that the use of a histochemical method, with toluidine blue staining, or the immunohistochemical method for CM detection, has similar results.
New roles of the CM have been identified, showing that these cells have a critical role, in innate immunity, or adaptive, normal or pathological immunity (e.g., acute or chronic bacterial or parasital infections, autoimmune diseases, pregnancy), including the immune tolerance16,19-22.
The interaction between the CM and the tumor cells occur in three forms, recently described: 1) its effect on tumor angiogenesis; 2) for mediating the tissue remodeling; 3) mast cell-dependent immune regulation via immune cell recruitment and immunosuppression4.
Tumor angiogenesis is essential for growth above 1 mm3, invasion and metastases in solid tumors4,9,16. Several evidences have shown that the CM have an important role in tumor angiogenesis9,16. The CM secrete the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin (IL)-8 and growth factors, which enable the formation of new vessels6. The infiltration of CM is well associated with tumor angiogenesis and metastases in gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, pulmonary adenocarcinoma, renal cell cancer and prostate cancer5.
It has been suggested that, in the context of developing tumors, the tissue remodeling ability of CM is subverted, leading to the rupture of adjacent extracellular matrix, thus, increasing the tumoral dissemination, mainly through greater release of MMP-94.
Immunosuppression is another basic finding in the tumor microenvironment. Although the immunological vigilance occurs in the initial stages of tumorigenesis, the tumor establishment first induces immune tolerance. An absolute suppression of the immune response is generated in the tumoral microenvironment only in late stages of the tumor23. The CM have been identified as having a critical role in the suppression of immune responses23. The histamine released by the CM can cause the tumor cells to proliferate through H1 receptors and suppress the immune response through H2 receptors6. SCF (stem cell factor)-activated CM accentuate the tumoral immunosuppression through the release of adenosine, which inhibits the production of interferon (IFN)-Γ and IL-2 by TCD4+ cells and the increase of T regulatory (Treg) cells, which release IL-10, a cytokine with immunosuppressant effect23,24.
Mutations in the tumoral suppressor, the colon adenomatous polyposis (APC) gene, are required to initiate hereditary or sporadic colorectal cancers. However, angiogenesis and tissue remodeling are required for the tumoral expansion19.
The bowel, just as other mucosae exposed to the external environment, is an area where inflammation and cancer are closely linked. Bacterial infections, exposure to toxic molecules that damage the epithelial barrier, genetic predisposition and increased immune reactivity can promote chronic colitis, which induces cellular proliferation, stromal remodeling, neoangiogenesis and suppression of the adaptive antitumor immune response25.
In the bowel, the CM play an important role in different processes, including cleaning of enteric pathogens, allergy to food, visceral hypersensitivity and intestinal cancer22.
CM in the human bowel are the greatest source of tumoral necrosis factor (TNF)-α of the gastrointestinal tract26. The TNF is required for the growth of adenoma, the colorectal cancer precursor lesion. Thus, the TNF released by the CM can act in an autocrine manner. In the absence of CM, the genetically altered epithelium is not able to develop into a complete tumor13. In this study, most cases (89.2%) presented concentration of mast cells in intestinal adenomas of up to 5 CM/10 HPF, with 50% of them not presenting CM in the studied material. Then, no association of the MC was observed with the patients' age or gender, nor with the histological type, size and cellular atypia of the adenomas, nor with the presence of associated lesions. The sample evaluated in this study presented predominance of tubulovillous and tubular adenomas, of less than 2 cm and with mild cellular atypia, which would tend to have a lower concentration of CM, for presenting lower risk of developing into an adenocarcinoma. Perhaps the small number of villous adenomas, adenomas of more than 3 cm and adenomas with severe cellular atypia influenced the non association of risk criteria for malignancy of adenomas with MC.
This study did not show any association between the MC and the histological type, size of presence of cellular atypia in intestinal adenomas, nor any association with the presence of adenocarcinoma in other intestinal areas.
1 Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Estimativa 2010: Incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2009 [cited: 2011 maio 15]. Available from: http://www.inca.gov.br [ Links ]
2 Zandoná B, Carvalho LP, Schimedt J, Koppe DC, Koshimizu RT, Mallmann ACM. Prevalência de adenomas colorretais em pacientes com história familiar para câncer colorretal. Rev Bras Coloproct 2011;31(2):147-54. [ Links ]
3 Kashiwase Y, Inamura H, Morioka J, Igarashi Y, Kawai-Kowase K, Kurosawa M. Quantitative analysis of mast cells in benign and malignant colonic lesions: immunohistochemical study on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Allergol Immunopathol 2008;36(5):271-6. [ Links ]
4 Maltby S, Khazaie K, McNagny KM. Mast cells in tumor growth: angiogenesis, tissue remodeling and immune-modulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009;1796(1): 19-26. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.02.001. [ Links ]
5 Gounaris E, Blatner NR, Dennis K, Magnusson F, Gurish MF, Strom TB, et al. T-regulatory cells shift from a protective anti-inflammatory to a cancer-promoting proinflammatory phenotype in polyposis. Cancer Res 2009;69(13):5490-7. [ Links ]
6 Conti P, Castellani ML, Kempuraj D, Salini V, Vecchiet J, Tetè S, et al. Role of mast cells in tumor growth. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2007;37(4):315-21. [ Links ]
7 Nechushtan H. The complexity of the complicity of mast cells in cancer. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2010;42(5):551-4. [ Links ]
8 McKerrow JH, Bhargava V, Hansell E, Huling S, Kuwahara T, Matley M, et al. A functional proteomics screen of proteases in colorectal carcinoma. Mol Med 2000;6(5):450-60. [ Links ]
9 Acikalin MF, Oner U, Topçu I, YaŞar B, Kiper H, Colak E. Tumour angiogenesis and mast cell density in the prognostic assessment of colorectal carcinomas. Dig Liver Dis 2005;37(3):162-9. [ Links ]
10 Taweevisit M. The association of stromal mast cell response and tumor cell differentiation in colorectal cancer. J Med Assoc Thai 2006;89(Suppl 3):S69-73. [ Links ]
11 Yodavudh S, Tangjitgamol S, Puangsa-Art S. Prognostic significance of microvessel density and mast cell density for the survival of Thai patients with primary colorectal cancer. J Med Assoc Thai 2008;91(5):723-32. [ Links ]
12 Gulubova M, Vlaykova T. Prognostic significance of mast cell number and microvascular density for the survival of patients with primary colorectal cancer. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;24(7):1265-75. [ Links ]
13 Gounaris E, Erdman SE, Restaino C, Gurish MF, Friend DS, Gounari F, et al. Mast cells are an essential hematopoietic component for polyp development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104(50):19977-82. DOI: 10.1073_pnas.0704620104. [ Links ]
14 Michalany J. Técnica histológica em anatomia patológica. Com instruções para o cirurgião, enfermeira e citotécnico. 3a ed. São Paulo: Editora Michalany Ltda.; 1998. p. 153-5. [ Links ]
15 Robbins. Basic Pathology. Kumar K, Abbas AK, Fausto N, Mitchell RN (editors). Oral cavity and gastrointestinal tract. Chapter 15. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier; 2008. p. 672-81. [ Links ]
16 Groot Kormelink T, Abudukelimu A, Redegeld FA. Mast cells as target in cancer therapy. Curr Pharm Des 2009;15(16):1868-78. [ Links ]
17 Nemolato S, Cabras T, Fanari MU, Cau F, Fraschini M, Manconi B, et al. Thymosin beta 4 expression in normal skin, colon mucosa and in tumor infiltrating mast cells. Eur J Histochem 2010;54(1):e3. [ Links ]
18 McGinnis MC, Bradley Jr. EL, Pretlow TP, Ortiz-Reyes R, Bowden CJ, Stellato TA, et al. Correlation of stromal cells by morphometric analysis with metastatic behavior of human colonic carcinoma. Cancer Res 1989;49:5989-93. [ Links ]
19 Kalesnikoff J, Galli SJ. New developments in mast cell biology. Nat Immunol 2008;9(11):1215-23. DOI:10.1038/ni.f.216. [ Links ]
20 Rao KN, Brown MA. Mast cells: multifaceted immune cells with diverse roles in health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008;1143:83-104. [ Links ]
21 Kumar V, Sharma A. Mast cells: Emerging sentinel innate immune cells with diverse role in immunity. Mol Immunol 2010;48(1-3):14-25. [ Links ]
22 Shea-Donohue T, Stiltz J, Zhao A, Notari L. Mast cells. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2010;12(5):349-57. [ Links ]
23 Huang B, Lei Z, Zhang G-M, Li D, Song C, Li B, et al. SCF-mediated mast cell infiltration and activation exacerbate the inflammation and immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment. Blood 2008;112(4):1269-79. DOI:10.1182/blood-2008-03-147033. [ Links ]
24 Blatner NR, Bonertza A, Beckhovea P, Cheonc EC, Krantzc SB, Strouchc M, et al. In colorectal cancer mast cells contribute to systemic regulatory T-cell dysfunction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107(14):6430-5. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0913683107. [ Links ]
25 Colombo MP, Piconese S. Polyps wrap mast cells and Treg within tumorigenic tentacles. Cancer Res 2009;69(14):5619-22. [ Links ]
26 Bischoff SC, Lorentz A, Schwengberg S, Weier G, Raab R, Manns MP. Mast cells are an important cellular source of tumour necrosis factor alfa in human intestinal tissue. Gut 1999;44:643-52. [ Links ]
Gisele Alborghetti Nai
Laboratório de Anatomia Patológica e Citopatologia
Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE)
Rua José Bongiovani, 700, Cidade Universitária
CEP: 19050-680 - Presidente Prudente (SP), Brazil
Submitted on: 10/17/2011
Approved on: 11/23//2011
Financing source: none.
Conflict of interest: nothing to declare.
Study carried out at the Department of Pathology of the Universidade do Oeste Paulista (UNOESTE) - Presidente Prudente (SP), Brazil.