SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número4Habilidade de ordenação temporal e nível de especificidade nos diferentes testes tonaisPotenciais evocados auditivos de longa latência em campo sonoro em crianças audiologicamente normais índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Audiology - Communication Research

versão On-line ISSN 2317-6431

Audiol., Commun. Res. vol.20 no.4 São Paulo out./dez. 2015

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2317-6431-2015-1602 

Original Articles

Wideband acoustic immittance measures using chirp and pure tone stimuli in infants with middle ear integrity

Priscila Pereira dos Santos1 

Eliene Silva Araújo1 

Orozimbo Alves Costa Filho2 

Marcelo de Toledo Piza3 

Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga2 

1Hospital of Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, Universidade de São Paulo – USP – Bauru (SP), Brazil

2Speech-Language, Pathology and Audiology Department, Bauru School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo – USP – Bauru (SP), Brazil

3Clínica Toledo Piza, Ribeirão Preto (SP), Brazil

ABSTRACT

Purpose:

To characterize the wideband reflectance and absorbance values in infants with middle ear integrity.

Methods:

The wideband reflectance and absorbance values for chirp and pure tone stimuli of 31 ears of infants aged 10 days to five months were analyzed. Inclusion criteria considered: 1000 Hz tympanometry. suggesting normal middle ear and the presence of transient evoked otoacoustic emission.

Results:

The reflectance values were shown to be greater for low frequencies, reducing to medium ones and increasing once again to high frequencies, while the absorbance values displayed an opposite behavior. No significant difference was verified between chirp and pure tone stimuli.

Conclusion:

A typical behavior of the measures, characterized by a higher reflectance at low frequencies and higher absorbance at medium frequencies was observed in the population studied.

Keywords: Ear, middle; Acoustic impedance tests; Hearing loss, Conductive; Otitis media; Audiology

INTRODUCTION

According to the literature. conductive hearing loss is the most frequent type of hearing loss in children. with a high prevalence in different countries(1). Conductive disorders are known to influence the results of tests routinely performed in clinical practice. For a conclusive diagnosis. therefore. these disorders must be diagnosed with methods that identify with precision middle ear abnormalities in children.

Traditionally, the most used method to evaluate the middle ear is tympanometry using a 226 Hz probe tone following the tympanometric classification proposed by Jerger (1970)(2). However, studies have been unanimous in demonstrating that tympanometry using this probe tone has low sensitivity to identify conductive disorders in neonates and infants up to six months of life(3).

Due to that. studies have analyzed the sensitivity of tympanometry using a 1000 Hz probe tone, showing lower false-negative rates(4,5). Nevertheless, abnormalities may not be identified in some cases that fall into an “undetermined” tympanometric curve(68), a circumstance in which the test fails to assist the audiologist in defining the presence or absence of conductive abnormalities.

In this context. the attention has turned back again to the analysis of acoustic reflectance. which has been studied since the decade of 1990's. With technological advances. this test began to be carried out in a more detailed manner and is currently named wideband acoustic immittance. This nomenclature was defined in a consensus among researchers in the field during the Eriksholm Workshop in 2013(9). Among the different measures analyzed with this procedure are wideband reflectance and absorbance.

Wideband power reflectance is the ratio between the reflected and incident energy presented to the external auditory meatus by a probe, therefore representing the amount of energy reflected by the tympanic membrane. Absorbance, in turn, consists in the ratio between the energy absorbed by the middle ear and the incident energy presented to the external auditory meatus. Both measures vary according to the frequency and impedance of the tympanic-ossicular system, and their values are complementary. Reflectance and absorbance consist of a real number between “zero” and “one”, in which “zero” represents all the energy transmitted to the middle ear, and “one” represents all the energy reflected to the acoustic meatus. Both may be represented in percentages(10).

Chirp and pure tone stimuli may be used to analyze these measures. with the first enabling a better frequency resolution and a faster measurement. The use of pure tone. in turn, provides a better signal-to-noise ratio and is a better option in situations of high environmental noise and/or circumstances proper to the condition of the patient(11). It is thus important to compare the clinical results associated with both stimuli. Even though there has been a growing number of studies analyzing these measures, these studies are mostly international. On a national level. there is only one published study that analyzed wideband power reflectance in neonates with 27 to 78 hours of life(12). Also, previous studies have shown a significant difference when comparing ethnic(13,14) and age groups(15).

Thus. the objective of this study was to characterize the results of wideband reflectance and absorbance with chirp and pure tone stimuli in infants with a normal middle ear.

METHODS

This was an observational, analytical, cross-sectional study developed with approval by the Ethics Committee of the Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), with the number 141.301/2012. We obtained free and informed consent from all parents/guardians of the participants.

The criteria for inclusion in the study were age zero to six months, a transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions test performed with general and frequency band reproducibility values ≥ 70%, a ≥ 6 dB signal-to-noise ratio for each frequency band. and a tympanometric evaluation using a 1000 Hz probe compatible with absence of middle ear abnormality according to the classification proposed by Baldwin (2006)(7) adapted from Marchant et al. (1986)(6). We excluded infants with risk indicators for hearing loss(16).

We determined wideband acoustic immittance measurements in the participants using the system Acoustics' Middle-Ear Power Analyzer (MEPA), version 5.0 (Mimosa Acoustics) with chirp and pure tone stimuli. The chirp stimulus was presented with a sound pressure level (SPL) of 60 dB, duration of 1 second, frequencies of 210.9 Hz to 6000 Hz and intervals of 24 Hz with a total of 248 analyzed frequencies. The pure tone stimulus was presented in nine frequencies (250, 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz) with an SPL of 60 dB and duration of 0.5 seconds.

Wideband acoustic immittance analyzes different measures including reflectance and absorbance, which were determined in the present study. Both were assessed at different frequencies, and the results are presented in percentages. We examined 31 ears in 18 infants aged 10 days to five months during natural sleep. We chose the initial ear based on the child's comfort position. Wideband acoustic immittance measurements were performed on the same day in which the inclusion criteria tests were performed. i.e.. tympanometry and transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.

We used descriptive statistics and paired Student's t test to analyze the data. setting the significance level at 5%.

RESULTS

The comparative analysis of the results obtained with the chirp and pure tone stimuli, performed with paired Student's t test, showed no significant difference between the two stimuli for both measures of reflectance and absorbance (p>0.05).

As for the average values obtained with power reflectance. we observed greater reflectance at low frequencies (258 to 750 Hz), showing that the amount of energy absorbed was lower in this range. Reflectance decreased with an increase in frequency (above 750 to 3000 Hz) reaching its lowest value near 1500 Hz. For frequencies above 3000 Hz the reflectance values increased. and when the frequency was close to 6000 Hz the reflected energy values decreased again (Figure 1, Table 1).

Figure 1 Mean and standard deviation for pure tone and chirp reflectance by each frequencyNote: SD = standard deviation 

Table 1 Mean and standard deviation, in percentage, for pure tone and chirp reflectance by each frequency 

258 Hz 492 Hz 750 Hz 1008 Hz 1500 Hz 1992 Hz 3000 Hz 4008 Hz 6000 Hz
Mean pure tone (%) 67.31 61.90 54.12 43.48 34.20 39.78 51.12 51.28 38.09
Mean + SD pure tone (%) 87.14 76.80 69.74 61.87 55.96 60.25 74.11 79.79 67.82
Mean - SD pure tone (%) 47.49 47.00 38.51 25.10 12.44 19.31 28.13 22.76 8.36
Mean chirp (%) 71.13 60.16 49.88 39.16 30.54 36.02 46.58 46.54 35.50
Mean + SD chirp (%) 118.91 75.05 65.19 57.55 49.95 56.49 69.53 75.06 64.19
Mean - SD chirp (%) 23.35 40.25 34.57 22.95 11.14 16.07 23.64 18.76 6.82

Note: SD = standard deviation

With regard to the absorbance values, we observed that they were inversely proportional to the reflectance values. showing lower values at low frequencies (250 to 750 Hz) increasing above 750 Hz reaching peak values close to the frequency of 1500 Hz and then decreasing again above the frequency of 3000 Hz (Figure 2, Table 2).

Figure 2 Mean and standard deviation for pure tone and chirp absorbance by each frequencyNote: SD = standard deviation 

Table 2 Mean and standard deviation, in percentage, for pure tone and chirp absorbance by each frequency 

258 Hz 492 Hz 750 Hz 1008 Hz 1500 Hz 1992 Hz 3000 Hz 4008 Hz 6000 Hz
Mean pure tone (%) 32.69 38.10 45.88 56.52 65.80 60.22 48.88 48.72 61.91
Mean + SD pure tone (%) 52.51 53.00 61.49 74.90 87.56 80.69 71.87 77.24 91.64
Mean - SD pure tone (%) 12.86 23.20 30.26 38.13 44.04 39.75 25.89 20.21 32.18
Mean chirp (%) 28.87 39.84 50.12 60.84 69.46 63.98 53.42 53.46 64.50
Mean + SD chirp (%) 76.65 54.74 65.43 79.22 88.86 84.45 76.36 81.98 93.18
Mean - SD chirp (%) -18.91 19.94 34.81 44.62 50.05 44.02 30.47 25.68 35.81

Note: SD = standard deviation

DISCUSSION

A growing number of studies analyzing the efficacy of wideband acoustic immittance measurements in assessing the integrity of the middle ear have demonstrated that this method has high sensitivity and specificity. even in children in the first months of life(1720). This reflects the importance of characterizing normal patterns in different populations, so the test may be later applied in clinical practice to identify conductive abnormalities(9).

This study characterized the measures of reflectance and absorbance in infants obtained with chirp and pure tone stimuli in the frequencies of 258 to 6000 Hz (Figures 1 and 2), showing higher reflectance at low frequencies and increased absorbance in the range of 750 to 3000 Hz. Similar findings have been observed in a national study(12) that has examined wideband acoustic immittance measurements in the first days of life. The study demonstrated that reflectance is greater for frequencies of 258 to 750 Hz and 4000 Hz and lower for those from 1000 to 3000 Hz and 6000 Hz showing greater energy transmission to the middle ear in the latter frequencies.

Similar results have also been shown by international studies(14,2124), including one(25) reporting that the reflectance was greater at low frequencies (250 to 1000 Hz), decreased at medium frequencies (from 1000 Hz to 4000 Hz), and increased again above the frequency of 4000 Hz. Results obtained in a later study(26), in turn. showed that the reflectance decreased along with the frequency when up to approximately 2000 Hz (with the lowest value close to the frequency of 500 Hz) returning to increase above the frequency of 2000 Hz.

The path of the wideband reflectance and absorbance measurements observed in this study may be explained by anatomical and physiological features. Infants have a smaller body structure and. therefore. a reduced middle ear volume, which reflects with a higher resonance frequency than that observed in adults. With greater resonance frequency. greater absorbance and lower reflectance are expected within this frequency range(25,26).

We observed no significant differences in responses obtained with the chirp and pure tone stimuli (Figures 1 and 2). This result is in line with others observed in previous studies evaluating neonates(12,14) and children(27), showing that both stimuli were equivalent. and suggesting that they may be used for wideband acoustic immittance measurements.

In contrast, these stimuli are known to probably have distinct clinical applicability since the pure tone stimulus has greater sensitivity when the test is performed in noisy conditions, whereas the chirp stimulus offers better frequency resolution, since it may be performed at intervals of 24 Hz(11). Thus, further studies are still necessary to compare these stimuli in different test circumstances in individuals with middle ear abnormalities. It is also important to assess eventual differences between the stimuli for other wideband acoustic immittance measurements.

Evaluation of the parameters gender and ear (right or left) was not part of the objective of this study since previous publications have not demonstrated a significant difference in results when these parameters were included in the analysis(14,27).

CONCLUSION

We observed that wideband acoustic immittance values displayed a typical response in infants younger than six months with a normal middle ear, characterized by greater reflectance in the frequency range of 258 to 750 Hz and greater absorbance near the frequency of 1500 Hz.

This study was held at Speech-Language, Pathology and Audiology Department, Bauru School of Dentistry, Universidade de São Paulo–USP–Bauru (SP), Brazil

REFERENCES

1. Daly KA, Hoffman HJ, Kvaerner KJ, Kvestad E, Casselbrant ML, Homoe P et al. Epidemiology, natural history, and risk factors: panel report from the Ninth International Research Conference on Otitis Media. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(3):231–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.09.006 [ Links ]

2. Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol. 1970;92(4):311–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1970.04310040005002 [ Links ]

3. Hunter LL, Margolis RH. Multifrequency tympanometry: current clinical application. Am J Audiol. 1992;1(3):33–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889.0103.33 [ Links ]

4. Mazlan R, Kei J, Hickson L, Gavranich J, Linning R. Test-retest reproducibility of the 1000 Hz tympanometry test in newborn and six-week-old healthy infants. Int J Audiol. 2010;49(11):815–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2010.493182 [ Links ]

5. Carmo MP, Almeida MG, Lewis DR. Timpanometria com tons teste de 226 Hz e 1 kHz em um grupo de lactentes com indicadores de risco para deficiência auditiva. Rev Soc Bras Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(1):66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000100013 [ Links ]

6. Marchant CD, McMillan PM, Shurin PA Johnson CE, Turczyk VA, Feinstein JC et al. Objective diagnosis of otitis media in early infancy by tympanometry and ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds. J Pediatr. 1986;109(4):590–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(86)80218-9 [ Links ]

7. Baldwin M. Choice of probe tone and classification of trace patterns in tympanometry undertaken in early infancy. Int J Audiol. 2006;45(7):417–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992020600690951 [ Links ]

8. Oliveira LC, Araújo ES, Zucki F, Funayama FS, Alvarenga KF, Feniman MR et al. Curva timpanométrica com sonda de 1000 Hz: análise comparativa de dois métodos de classificação. In: Anais do 27° Encontro Internacional de Audiologia; 14–17 abr 2012; Bauru, Brasil. São Paulo: Academia Brasileira de Audiologia; 2012. p. 220. [ Links ]

9. Feeney MP, Hunter LL, Kei J, Lilly DJ, Margolis RH, Nakajima HH et al. Consensus statement: eriksholm workshop on wideband absorbance measures of the middle ear. Ear Hear. 2013;34 Suppl 1:78s-9s. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829c726b [ Links ]

10. Neely ST, Stenfelt S, Schairer KS. Alternative ear-canal measures related to absorbance. Ear Hear. 2013;34 Suppl 1:72s-7s. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829c7229 [ Links ]

11. Mimosa Acoustics. Middle-ear power analyzer measurement: manual for HearlD 5.0. Champaign: Mimosa Acoustics; 2011. [ Links ]

12. Silva KAL, Urosas JG, Sanches SGG, Carvallo RMM. Reflectância de banda larga em recém-nascidos com presença de emissões otoacústicas evocadas por transiente. CoDAS. 2013;25(1):29–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S2317-17822013000100006 [ Links ]

13. Beers AN, Shahnaz N, Westerberg BD, Kozak FK. Wideband reflectance in normal Caucasian and Chinese school-aged children and in children with otitis media with essusion. Ear Hear. 2010;31(2):221–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c00eae [ Links ]

14. Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C. Wideband absorbance in Australian Aboriginal and Caucasian neonates. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(5):482–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.25.5.7 [ Links ]

15. Hunter LL, Tubaugh L, Jackson A, Propes S. Wideband middle ear power measurement in infants and children. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19(4):309–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19.4.4 [ Links ]

16. Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Am J Audiol. 2000;9(1):9–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/1059-0889(2000/005) [ Links ]

17. Vander Werff KR, Prieve BA, Georgantas LM. Test-retest reliability of wideband reflectance measures in infants under screening and diagnostic test conditions. Ear Hear. 2007;28(5):669–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f71b1 [ Links ]

18. Sanford CA, Keefe DH, Liu YW, Fitzpatrick D, McCreery RW, Lewis D et al. Sound-conduction effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in newborn infants: test performance of wideband acoustic transfer functions and 1-kHz tympanometry. Ear Hear. 2009;30(6):635–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b61cdc [ Links ]

19. Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C, Khan A, Swanston A. Wideband absorbance outcomes in newborns: a comparison with high-frequency tympanometry, automated brainstem response, and transient evoked and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear. 2015;36(5):e237–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000175 [ Links ]

20. Hunter LL, Prieve BA, Kei J, Sanford CA. Pediatric applications of wideband acoustic immittance measures. Ear Hear. 2013;34 Suppl 1:36S-42S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d5158 [ Links ]

21. Sanford CA, Feeney MP. Effects of maturation on tympanometric wideband acoustic transfer functions in human infants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008;124(4):2106–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.2967864 [ Links ]

22. Keefe DH, Folsom RC, Gorga MP, Vohr BR, Bulen JC, Norton SJ. Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: ear-canal measurements of acoustic admittance and reflectance in neonates. Ear Hear. 2000;21(5):443–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200010000-00009 [ Links ]

23. Merchant GR, Horton NJ, Voss SE. Normative reflectance and transmittance measurements on healthy newborn and 1-month-old infants. Ear Hear. 2010;31(6):746–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e68e68 [ Links ]

24. Aithal S, Kei J, Driscoll C. Wideband absorbance in young infants (0–6 months): a cross-sectional study. J Am Acad Audiol. 2014;25(5):471–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.25.5.6 [ Links ]

25. Shahnaz N, Feeney MP, Schairer KS. Wideband acoustic immittance normative data: ethnicity, gender, aging, and instrumentation. Ear Hear. 2013;34 Suppl 1:27S-35S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d5328 [ Links ]

26. Shahnaz N. Wideband reflectance in neonatal intensive care units. J Am Acad Audiol. 2008;19(5):419–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.19.5.4 [ Links ]

27. Hunter LL, Feeny MP, Lapsley Miller JA, Jeng PS, Bohning S. Wideband reflectance in newborns: normative regions and relationship to hearing-screening results. Ear Hear. 2010;31(5):599–610. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e40ca7 [ Links ]

Received: July 21, 2015; Accepted: October 26, 2015

Correspondence address: Departamento de Fonoaudiologia. Kátia de Freitas Alvarenga. Al. Octávio Pinheiro Brisola, 9-75, Bauru (SP), Brazil, CEP: 17012-901. E-mail: katialv@fob.usp.br

Conflict of interests: No

Authors' contribution:PPS collected and tabulated the data, collaborated in the data analysis and preparation of the manuscript and approved its final version for publication; ESA designed the study, collected tabulated and analyzed the data, prepared the manuscript and approved its final version for publication; OACF collaborated in the data analysis, drafted and revised the article, and approved its final version for publication; MTP collaborated in the data analysis, drafted and revised the manuscript and approved its final version for publication; KFA designed the study, oversaw the collection and tabulation of the data, analyzed the data, prepared the manuscript and approved its final version for publication.

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.