text new page (beta)
English (pdf)
Article in xml format
Curriculum ScienTI
Automatic translation
Cited by SciELO 
Cited by Google 
Similars in
SciELO 
Similars in Google 
Permalink
INTRODUCTION
The global population is aging, and the interest in studying associations between thyroid dysfunctions and the aging process is increasing (1). Serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels have been found to be elevated in the elderly population and positively related to age (2,3). These values lie to the right of the normal distribution curve, even in healthy subjects without autoimmune markers (4,5), suggesting that TSH elevation is part of a physiological process related to aging, such as an alteration in the TSH set point or reduced TSH bioactivity, rather than occult thyroid disease (2,3,6). Furthermore, population-specific and age-stratified reference values for serum TSH levels have recently been established (7).
High serum TSH levels seem to be associated with better survival and mobility in individuals aged > 85 years comparing to those at the same age but with serum TSH in the reference range (8-10). Furthermore, recently, an association between lower levels of serum TSH, even in the normal range, and negative outcomes has been proposed, as demonstrated in population-based studies which evaluated depressive symptoms (11), cognitive impairment (12) and hip fractures (13).
As mentioned, elderly individuals with elevated TSH levels have shown better outcomes, especially regarding functionality, than have those with serum TSH levels in the “normal” range (8-10). In a study including 2,290 elderly subjects, Simonsick and cols. (9) showed that a slightly elevated TSH level was associated with a slight functional advantage and less decline over time. Other important prospective observational study of 599 subjects with a 4-year follow-up period showed that individuals aged > 85 years with “abnormally” high TSH levels did not experience adverse effects of disability in daily life, depressive symptoms, or a decline in cognitive function, and had a prolonged life span in comparison with euthyroid individuals (10).
An hypothesis is that these results may be due to the inclusion of individuals with subclinical hyperthyroidism in the group of subjects with “normal” serum TSH levels, as those with TSH levels near the lower limit of normal might have worse outcomes, what is investigated in the present study.
Subclinical hyperthyroidism is a risk for atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiovascular disease in elderly subjects (14,15). Concerning to adult population, subclinical hyperthyroidism may be associated with impaired functional and hemodynamic responses during graded cardiopulmonary exercise testing, including: premature achievement of the anaerobic threshold; elevated heart rate (HR); lower peak values of relative oxygen uptake(
O2), relative carbon dioxide production (CO2) and minute ventilation (E); chronotropic incompetence; and attenuated HR and blood pressure recovery immediately after exercise (16). Even recently, Mercuro and cols. demonstrated that individual tailoring of the TSH-suppressive L-T4 dose in a small group of seven patients, through six months, in order to elevate serum TSH from 0.003 to 0.1 mU/mL was associated with normalization of echocardiography and exercise performance (17).
Besides to impairment of physical performance to exercise, individuals with subclinical hyperthyroidism may experience symptoms impacting quality of life (QOL) (18-20). Other complaints include reduced upper-limb muscle function, muscle mass, and mid-thigh girth; and increased fatigue (20,21).
Based on these findings, the aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in the cardiopulmonary capacity and QOL between healthy elderly people (≥ 65 years) with different TSH levels within the normal range. In addition, we investigated the effects of TSH elevation on cardiopulmonary capacity and QOL, by administering an anti-thyroid drug (methimazole) to subjects with initial TSH values at the lower normal limit (0.4 to 1.0 μIU/mL) in order to elevate their serum TSH levels to the upper half of the normal TSH range.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study design
Initially, a cross-sectional study was performed to compare cardiopulmonary capacity at peak exercise and QOL between healthy seniors (age ≥ 65 years) with TSH levels < 1.0 and ≥ 1.0 μIU/mL (both within the normal range).
In the second phase of research, participants with serum TSH levels < 1.0 μIU/mL were included in a non-controlled, prospective, interventional study to investigate the effect of TSH elevation using an anti-thyroid drug (methimazole) on perceived QOL and cardiopulmonary capacity at peak exercise (CPET).
Intervention study protocol
Participants with serum TSH levels < 1.0 μIU/mL were invited to participate in the intervention phase. Those who agreed to methimazole administration to raise TSH levels to > 2.0 μIU/mL (in the normal range) were included in the prospective phase. The initial methimazole dosage was 5 mg/day; it was increased or decreased to obtain the desired level according to each subject’s serum TSH level at assessments performed every 2 months throughout the study. The 6-month follow-up period was considered to begin on the day that the desired TSH level was first detected, with TSH levels continuously maintained within the target range. After the 6-month period, the QOL and the cardiopulmonary capacity at peak exercise were reassessed. The study protocol has been registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01849861).
Patients
From the general population, we actively searched healthy elderly subjects (aged ≥ 65 years) of both sexes with serum TSH levels within the reference range of 0.4–5.8 μIU/mL (7). The exclusion criteria were: very physically active status (> 150 min/week regular physical activity, > 10 metabolic equivalents), previous thyroid disease (multi-nodular goiter with small areas of functional autonomy, presence of circulating anti-TSH receptor autoantibodies, or autoimmune thyroid disease), hypothalamic-pituitary disease, congestive heart failure, chronic renal disease, acute respiratory disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, cancer, cirrhosis, diseases of the aorta, pulmonary disease, peripheral vascular disease, and coronary artery disease. Subjects using corticosteroids, amiodarone, dopamine, or any drug that interferes with thyroid hormone levels and/or thyroid function, as well as those taking drugs that interfered with autonomic adjustment mechanisms (beta blockers, calcium channel blockers, and levodopa), were also excluded. Subjects who were bedridden, used a wheelchair, or had any physical limitation or dependence that could interfere with CPET were excluded.
All patients were thereafter enrolled in the study, which was conducted at the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital (HUCFF) of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The local ethics committee approved the study protocol (040/11-CEP), in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All participants provided written consent before study enrollment.
Clinical evaluation and laboratory assays
A physician obtained anamneses, performed physical examinations, measured vital signs, and reviewed subjects’ medical records. Then, a fasting blood collection for laboratory analysis of serum TSH and free thyroxine (FT4) levels was scheduled within 1 week. The WHOQOL-OLD questionnaire was applied on the same day or in the same week as the medical appointments, like the performance of CPET.
TSH and FT4 (normal range, 0.8–1.9 ng/dL) levels were measured with an immunochemiluminescence assay (Immulite; Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA) at the Laboratory of Clinical Pathology/Hormone Section of HUCFF. The normal range for TSH was defined according to recent recommendations specific for age (7).
Patients were then divided into two groups based on serum TSH levels: group 1: 0.4–0.9 μIU/mL (lower reference range,) and group 2: ≥ 1.0 μIU/mL. QOL and cardiopulmonary capacity were compared between these groups and thereafter an assessment was made after the methimazole intervention.
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing
Before the CPET, all subjects were instructed to avoid physical exercise, drinking alcohol, taking caffeine (for one day), and smoking (for at least 4 h before the exam). The CPET was executed on a treadmill (EG 700.2; Ecafix, Brazil) using an individualized ramp protocol (22-25). A 1-lead electrocardiogram (EKG; Cardio Perfect; Ecafix, Brazil) was used to monitor the patients during the test. Respiratory gas exchange was sampled from a mouthpiece connected to a medium flow meter and a gas analyzer (VO2000; Medical Graphics, USA). To avoid the escape of gas, a nose clip was used. During each breath, the expired fractions of oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) and the ventilation flow were measured. Blood pressure was determined by the auscultation method (1400-C, Narcosul, Brazil). Participants were asked about the perception of effort using the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion (6 = very easy; 20 = maximal effort) (26,27) every three minutes during exercise. All participants were informed about the test interruption criteria, according to the American College of Sports and Medicine (ACSM, 2009) (27).
The following parameters were considered in the analysis: velocity and grade (Km/h and %), total duration of effort (min:s), heart rate (HR; beats per minute [bpm]), systolic blood pressure (SBP; mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP; mmHg), Borg Scale, relative oxygen uptake ( O2; mL·kg-1·min-1), relative carbon dioxide production ( CO2; mL·kg-1·min-1), minute ventilation (E or O2/HR; L/min), gas exchange ratio (R = O2/ CO2), and O2 pulse (ml/beat). The same skilled professionals conducted all CPET, in a blinded manner with regard to the TSH range (16,22-24,26,27).
WHOQOL-OLD evaluation
QOL was assessed by a validated Portuguese version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life for Older Persons (WHOQOL-OLD) questionnaire (28).
The WHOQOL-OLD instrument, which has a specific module for assessing QOL in elderly individuals, was self-administered by participants. The same interviewer, who was blinded to participants’ TSH levels, supervised the application of all questionnaires.
The validated Portuguese version of WHOQOL- OLD questionnaire (28) comprises 24 items, with responses recorded using a five-point Likert scale. The instrument is divided into six facets of four items each; facet scores range from 4 to 20 points (converted through syntax to a 0–100 scale) (28,29). Overall scores are composed of the six facet scores, combined with responses to the 24 items. Higher scores represent better QOL with regard to a given facet.
The six facets and their component items are:
Facet I: Sensory abilities. Items: impairments to senses affect daily life, loss of sensory abilities affecting participation in activities, problems with sensory functioning affect ability to interact, rate sensory functioning.
Facet II: Autonomy. Items: freedom to make your own decisions; feel in control of your future, people around you are respectful of your freedom, able to do things you’d like.
Facet III: Past, present and future activities. Items: satisfied with opportunities to continue achieving, received the recognition you deserve in life, satisfied with what you’ve achieved in life, happy with things to look forward to.
Facet IV: Social participation. Items: have enough to do each day, satisfied with the way you use your time, satisfied with your level of activity, satisfied with your opportunity to participate in the community.
Facet V: Death and dying. Items: concerned about the way you will die, afraid of not being able to control death, scared of dying, fear pain before death.
Facet VI: Intimacy. Items: feel a sense of companionship in life, experience love in your life, opportunities to love, opportunities to be loved (28-30).
Statistical analyses
Descriptive analyses included the calculation of means ± standard deviations (medians) for continuous variables and relative frequencies for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups with baseline TSH values of < 1 and ≥ 1 μIU/mL were made using the Mann–Whitney U-test, as the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test indicated that the variables were not normally distributed. To analyze correlations between TSH ranges and other continuous variables the Spearman’s nonparametric test was used. To analyze the impact of the methimazole intervention, the Wilcoxon test was used to compare baseline and post-intervention characteristics.
Subsequently, a sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the extent to which withdrawals could have biased the results regarding cardiopulmonary outcomes. For this purpose, all patients lost to follow up were included in sensitivity analyses that were performed to simulate scenarios in which all patients lost to follow up showed either the best or the worst results for the consumption of O2.
All analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 13.0 for Windows; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with a significance level of p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS
Cross-sectional study
Eighty-nine healthy elderly people met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated in the cross-sectional study (Figure 1A). Baseline clinical characteristics and laboratory data are shown in table 1. A total of 75 participants had TSH levels ≥ 1 μIU/mL, and 14 presented with TSH < 1 μIU/mL. The groups had similar mean FT4 values (Table 1). The two groups were comparable with respect to sex, age, weight, body mass index (BMI), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and physical activity level (Table 1).
Figure 1 Flowchart of study participants. (A) Thyroid Status at baseline/Stratification by ranges of TSH. (B) Prospective phase (group of intervention). An active search was conducted for healthy elderly (≥ 65 year old) people of both sexes. * Missed the consultant or did not agree to realize the CPTE, or did not have laboratory exams. CP = Cardio pulmonary test; WHOQOL-OLD = World Health Organization Quality of Life for Older Persons questionnaire.
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of study participants overall and stratified by TSH range
| Total (n = 89) | TSH < 1.0 μIU/mL (n = 14) | TSH ≥ 1.0 μIU/mL (n = 75) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Demographic characteristics | ||||
| Sex (female), n (%) | 59 (66.30) | 7 (50.00) | 52 (69.33) | 0.162 |
| Age (years), mean ± SD (median) | 71.69 ± 5.22 (71.00) | 71.85 ± 4.52 (71.00) | 71.66 ± 5.37 (70.00) | 0.623 |
|
Biometric characteristics, mean ± SD (median) | ||||
| BMI (kg/m2) | 27.31 ± 4.42 (26.30) | 28.14 ± 4.44 (26.65) | IMC = 27.16 ± 4.43 (26.30) | 0.513 |
| Baseline HR (bpm) | 74.65 ± 13.90 (73.00) | 76.00 ± 13.62 (73.00) | 74.40 ± 14.03 (73.00) | 0.757 |
| Baseline SBP (mmHg) | 145.32 ± 23.07 (146.00) | 142.71 ± 26.40 (140.00) | 145.81 ± 22.56 (150.00) | 0.713 |
| Baseline DBP (mmHg) | 82.39 ± 12.47 (80.00) | 81.21 ± 14.16 (81.00) | 82.61 ± 12.22 (80.00) | 0.922 |
| Baseline TSH (μIU/mL) | 1.94 ± 1.18 (1.64) | 0.73 ± 0.11 (0.73) | 2.16 ± 1.15 (1.74) | 0.000 |
| Baseline FT4 (ng/dL) | 1.08 ± 0.16 (1.07) | 1.16 ± 0,19 (1.13) | 1.07 ± 0.16 (1.04) | 0.069 |
TSH, thyroid stimulating hormone; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; HR, heart rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; FT4, free thyroxine.
No difference in global WHOQOL-OLD score or transformed facet scores was observed between groups and they did not differ in terms of cardiopulmonary function at peak exercise (Tables 2 and 3). QOL and cardiopulmonary variables were not correlated with serum TSH or FT4 levels (Tables 2 and 3).
Table 2 WHOQOL-OLD – Comparisons of Total Global Score and transformed facet scores (0–100%) between groups and its correlations with baseline serum TSH and FT4
| Scores in WHOQOL-OLD according to serum TSH ranges |
Correlations with TSH |
Correlations with FT4 |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSH < 1.0 μIU / mL (n = 14) | TSH ≥ 1.0 μIU / mL (n = 75) | P* | r** | p*** | r** | p*** | ||
| Total Global score | 97.20 ± 11.92 (97.00) | 90.72 ± 11.95 (91.50) | 0.844 | 0.009 | 0.468 | -0.053 | 0.330 | |
| Facet I | Sensory abilities | 77.56 ± 18.27 (75.0) | 78.04 ± 17.89 (81.25) | 0.844 | 0.009 | 0.468 | -0.052 | 0.332 |
| Facet II | Autonomy | 70.31 ± 16.88 (71.87) | 63.35 ± 16.83 (62.50) | 0.178 | -0.009 | 0.466 | -0.014 | 0.445 |
| Facet III | Past, present and future activities | 73.95 ± 21.62 (75.00) | 70.46 ± 15.67 (68.75) | 0.242 | -0.100 | 0.181 | 0.024 | 0.421 |
| Facet IV | Social participation | 69.79 ± 18.80 (68.75) | 67.97 ± 19.73 (68.75) | 0.899 | -0.012 | 0.455 | -0.088 | 0.230 |
| Facet V | Death and dying | 77.60 ± 22.68 (84.37) | 72.04 ± 26.77 (81.25) | 0.500 | 0.015 | 0.444 | -0.017 | 0.442 |
| Facet VI | Intimacy | 74.47 ± 26.84 (81.25) | 65.83 ± 21.35 (75.00) | 0.131 | -0.088 | 0.211 | -0.007 | 0.475 |
* Mann–Whitney U-test. ** r, Spearman (correlation with TSH), *** p value of correlation with TSH. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (median). TSH, thyroid stimulating,
Non-controlled trial
Twelve of the 14 participants with serum TSH levels < 1.0 μIU/mL agreed to participate in the prospective study. Nine of these subjects completed the study, with a mean intervention duration time of 11 months (Figure 1B).
Paired analysis showed no significant difference in weight, BMI, HR, SBP, or DBP obtained before and after methimazole treatment (Table 4). Moreover, no difference was observed between pre- and post-intervention global WHOQOL-OLD scores or transformed facet scores and also CPET variables (Table 4 and Figure 2).
Table 4 Paired analysis evaluating the impact of methimazole intervention in clinical variables, WHOQOL-OLD and TCEP
Figure 2 Comparative analysis before vs. after methimazole (MMI) intervention study (n = 9). O2, oxygen; CO2, carbon dioxide; O2, relative oxygen uptake; CO2, relative carbon dioxide production; R, gas exchange ratio (R = O2/ CO2).
The absence of significant variations in CPET with intervention was maintained after sensitivity analyses that were performed to simulate scenarios in which all patients lost to follow up showed either the best or the worst results in CPET variations. In these analyses, we assumed the consumption of O2 as the main outcome measure of the CPET. Considering the best result as an improvement of 61% in the O2 measurement, the paired analyses showed that the variation through time in the twelve participants did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.239). Moreover, no significant results were observed for the worst scenario, namely, a decrease in the O2 measurement of 39% (p = 0.158).
DISCUSSION
This is the first study to assess the effect of antithyroid drug use in order to increase serum TSH level to the upper normal range in elderly subjects with initial TSH levels < 1.0 μIU/mL and also, the first to make the cross-sectional analysis, considering the outcome in respiratory effort. The results did not corroborate the hypothesis that lower serum TSH levels, within the normal reference range, has negative impact on QOL or cardiopulmonary capacity during exercise in healthy elderly people. Furthermore, the intervention intending to increase serum TSH to the upper normal range did not generate significant changes in the evaluated outcomes.
Few studies have evaluated exercise performance in thyroid dysfunctions (17,21,31-36) and the minority applied ergospirometry to quantify cardiopulmonary capacity during exercise (17,21,31,32,35,36). Most of these studies have important limitations, like the restricted sectional design (17,34,35) and, even in a prospective way, the absence of a control group like the present one (33). The inclusion of subclinical and overt hypo or hyperthyroidism in the same sample is also reported by some studies (33). Concerning to subclinical hyperthyroidism, Vigário and cols. demonstrated that low levels of TSH is associated with impaired functional and hemodynamic responses during exercise and its recovery evaluating 29 women on TSH-suppressive therapy for thyroid carcinoma (16). Portella and cols. in a sectional controlled study with young and middle-aged female patients did not shown impaired exercise performance, using a treadmill cardiopulmonary test, in exogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism (34). Recently, it was demonstrated that TSH-suppressive therapy with levothyroxine (L-T4) can cause symptoms of hyperthyroidism, modifications in myocardial structure, and altered cardiopulmonary function during physical activity (17). Furthermore it was demonstrated that adjustment of the L-T4 dose to increase slightly serum TSH, might reverse some cardiovascular parameters and improve thyrotoxic symptoms in this small sample (17).
Currently, the interesting about the impact of lower levels of serum TSH, even in the normal range, in the elderly has increasing (11-13). The hypothesis is related to possible inclusion of misdiagnosed subjects with subclinical hyperthyroidism in this subgroup, however other hypothesis should be elucidated. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that serum TSH levels bellow 1.0 mUI/L, even in the reference range, may have negative outcomes in elderly subjects, concerning to depressive symptoms, cognition and hip fracture risk (11-13). By the possible correspondence with adverse effects related to subclinical hyperthyroidism, the study of TSH range next those low abnormal values seems to be justified. The cut-off applied (< 1.0 mUI/L) in the present study is in accordance with the reported adverse effects described in recent cohorts of elderly subjects with those serum TSH levels (11-13).
Since it was previously demonstrated that subclinical hyperthyroidism is associated with worse QOL and fatigue (20), our primary hypothesis was based on fact that those patients, in the lower TSH reference range, would behave as subclinical hyperthyroidism, once the curve of normality of TSH for elderly is dropped to the right. Also, the hypothesis is justified by previous demonstration of worse outcomes in elderly with serum TSH in the normal range when compared with those with minimal elevations of serum TSH (9,10).
Similarly to us, Eskelinen and cols. (37) demonstrated no association between thyroid function and self- related health, life satisfaction, or most symptoms in a thyroid disease–free elderly population.
The relationships between thyroid hormones and cognitive and health-related QOL impairment, however, remain controversial. Possible links at the molecular level between cognition and thyroid failure should be investigated further. Patients with thyroid autoimmune diseases report reduced health-related QOL, regardless of thyroid dysfunction (19).
In the present study, we recognize that, in the first phase, the cross-sectional design does not allow conclusions about causality inference, and it can be considered an important weakness of the study. Furthermore, one important limitation, regarding the prospective phase of the study, was the absence of a control group with elderly patients in the lowest level of serum TSH, but without intervention throughout the time. It is not known if methimazole therapy might blunt a possible decline in the studied parameters throughout the time in this specific population. By this way, we may not conclude that methimazole had truly no impact on CPET and QOL of elderly with low levels of serum TSH. It would be more appropriated to compare the effect of this therapy with “no treatment” throughout the time. Despite this question, there is consensus that is very difficulty to compose a control group of elderly subjects, completely health, and with serum TSH < 1,0 μIU/mL. So, the small sample size is justified by the rigorous inclusion/exclusion criteria but might reduce the power of the study. In the other hand, the very strict criteria for inclusion in the study generate uniform groups, which also could minimize the absence of adjustment of results for any potential confounders in the small sample size.
We believed that the follow-up time of six months after target therapy (medium time of 11 months on methimazol use) would be another limitation susceptible to criticism. The short follow-up time could be not enough and might be one of the reasons for the absence of significant changes throughout the time. Specially as considering the hypothesis that methimazole therapy might have held a worsening of outcomes in the intervention group, and similarly, the observational group would have been worsen through the time. In that case, the limited time might be rather insufficient to show such differences. Despite these considerations, other interventional studies that evaluated cardiopulmonary parameters showed significant differences also in few months (21,32). Even after six months of intervention, the changes on TSH levels, impacted on heart rate, cardiopulmonary parameters, QOL (32), muscle mass or fatigue (21).
Another limitation of the present study was the number of dropouts and the small number of participants concluding the intervention phase. It is a common limitation concerning studies evaluating exercise performance (38), specially including elderly subjects. These factors are also justified by the involvement of a selected group of elderly patients who had also to repeat exercise performance and by the difficult of having so health old people with TSH in this low-normal reference range, without thyroid disease, to receive investigational intervention with methimazole, since only just less than 11% of elderly over 70 years old has TSH between 0.5 – 1.0 mIU/L (39).
It is important to emphasize that the patients who dropped out of the intervention study did not do so because of adverse events. In fact, side effects were not reported by any patient throughout the study, although it is expected that adverse events may occur in up to 13% of patients using anti-thyroid drug (40) Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis permitted us to simulate a scenario in which all patients lost to follow-up would have shown a null variation, and even in such a condition, we still detected no differences in CPET after methimazole treatment.
The absence of association between serum TSH and CPET parameters or QOL may also be justified by the particularity of enrolled subjects in the study, which were completely healthy. Those criteria were not applied by the different studies that found worse outcomes in those patients with lower levels of serum TSH, even in the normal range (9-13). Additionally to the hypothesis of inclusion of misdiagnosed subclinical hyperthyroid patients in this subgroup (9-13), we may argue if possible conditions associated with worse outcomes are more frequent in those patients with lower serum TSH and contribute to the finds. Comorbidities and drugs should be included in those conditions, since it is known that some drugs, like metformin and dopamine, may blunt the rise of serum TSH (7).
We emphasize that there is no evidence to prescribe methimazole intending to reduce potential non-specific symptoms (i.e., fatigue, sensory disabilities, loss of autonomy) in elderly people with low-normal TSH levels. This approach should be performed only for investigational purpose, intending to test a hypothesis with rational basis, and, is justified by the demonstration of associations between worse outcomes in the elderly with serum TSH bellow 1.0 mIU/L in recent studies (11-13). At this time, we may not recommend the use of methimazole for patients with lower-normal TSH value but we suggest that it should be better investigated by other studies. Furthermore, it is universally accept that endogenous subclinical hyperthyroidism in older individuals may benefit from treatment with methimazole to prevent atrial fibrillation and osteoporosis (14,15), even with serum TSH > 0.1-0.4 mIU/L. The aim of the present study was to assess whether there would be any change in outcomes, by treating similar patients, with serum TSH slightly next above this range.
Our speculation about possible harm effect on QOL or cardiopulmonary capacity associated with lower normal TSH levels in health elderly was not confirmed. We found no differences in cardiopulmonary capacity of individuals with different TSH levels within the normal range and no changes in these parameters after methimazole treatment. In the future, more studies, especially with a controlled manner, must be carried out to address this question.
