Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With end Stage Renal Disease

Abstract

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). The coexistence of high thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risks, added to the lack of strong scientific evidence on the safety of anticoagulants in the setting of renal failure, makes this a clinically challenging situation.

Objectives

To describe the clinical-demographic profile and prevalence of AF in the population with ESRD undergoing dialysis. Secondary objectives include the assessment of thromboembolic (CHA₂DS₂VASC) and bleeding (HASBLED) risk scores.

Methods

Cross-sectional analytical-descriptive study, carried out between January and March 2020. Patients with ESRD were evaluated by means of a medical history questionnaire, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogram. A chi-square (χ2) association test was applied to calculate association between clinical variables and AF, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

Results

This study evaluated 295 patients, most of whom were men (170), elderly (63, IQR 53-71), current smokers (130), with associated cardio-endocrine comorbidities. The prevalence of AF was 6.7% (20). Heart failure (HF) (χ2=15.417; p<0.001), age of 65 years or older (χ2=14.584; p<0.001), and anticoagulation (χ2=5.715; p<0.01) were associated with AF. The median CHA₂DS₂VASC and HASBLED was 4 and 3, respectively. Eight patients were taking warfarin and five were receiving apixaban.

Conclusion

The prevalence of AF in this study is similar to that reported in other published articles on the subject, and patients were at high risk for cardiovascular outcomes. Non-anticoagulation strategy was commonly adopted due to controversies in the literature as well as the absence of published randomized clinical trials.

Atrial fibrillation; chronic renal insufficiency; renal dialysis

Introduction and objectives

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in clinical practice worldwide. The prevalence of AF increases with age and is associated with higher rates of morbidity and mortality, social and economic impacts for these patients.¹ Studies show that there is a bidirectional pathway between chronic kidney disease (CKD) and AF, due to complex pathophysiological mechanisms, patients with renal dysfunction are at higher risk of this arrhythmia, as AF can accelerate the decline in renal function.² , ³

Both conditions share common risk factors, which increase the risk of cardiovascular events, such as stroke, thromboembolism, bleeding, and death.⁴ , ⁵ Patients with CKD requiring dialysis have a higher prevalence and risk of developing AF, as well as worse outcomes.⁵

Data from clinical trials evaluating anticoagulation in chronic kidney failure did not provide solid evidence, and a gap can been observed in the management of these patients.⁴ The new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) and the vitamin K antagonist (warfarin) are strongly recommended for the prevention of thromboembolic phenomena;⁶ - ¹¹ however, its use in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) remains unclear.

The lack of robust evidence to treat this population remains a challenge. In addition, few studies in the literature have evaluated the prevalence of AF in patients with ESRD. Thus, the objective of this paper was to evaluate the prevalence of AF in patients with ESRD who are undergoing dialysis and, secondarily, calculate the thromboembolic (CHA₂DS₂VASC) and bleeding (HASBLED) risk scores, as well as describe the sociodemographic profile of patients and their use of oral anticoagulants.

Methods

This is an observational, cross-sectional, analytical-descriptive study carried out in the nephrology service at Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Passos (SCMP) in patients with ESRD who are undergoing dialysis. This study was approved by the local Research Ethics Committee, and informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Through hospital databases, all patients with ESRD who were undergoing dialysis were identified between January and March 2020. Patients were considered eligible for this study if they were aged 18 years or over. Exclusion criteria included: patients undergoing kidney transplantation, patients who did not participate in a follow-up analysis in the dialysis service, and those who did not agree to participate. Moreover, patients who died from any cause before data collection was completed were excluded. After having selected the study participants, 295 patients were evaluated ( Central Illustration ).

Central Illustration
: Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With end Stage Renal Disease

Data collection was performed during the weekly dialysis session, and patients answered a medical history questionnaire, and underwent physical examination and a 12-lead electrocardiogram, between January and March 2020.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive data of clinical and demographic variables were presented by the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. Absolute and relative frequencies were applied for categorical variables. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov was used with Lilliefors significance correction for continuous variables: age, time on renal replacement therapy, creatinine, CHA₂DS₂VASC and HASBLED. The normality test identified non-normal distribution for continuous variables, except for creatinine.

The chi-square (χ2) test was used to analyze the association between the variables and AF. For all analyses, α = 0.05 was adopted as being statistically significant. Analysis were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (IBM® SPSS® Statistics), version 20.0.¹²

Results

A total of 295 patients with ESRD who were undergoing dialysis were included in this analysis. Of these, most were males, the median body mass index (BMI) was normal weight, and the majority of patients were from neighboring municipalities of the city of Passos, MG (two patients were unable to report their precedence). The median time on renal replacement therapy was 30 months. Current smokers corresponded to 44% (130) and former smokers to 15.9% (47). The median serum creatinine was 8.1.

Hypertension was the most prevalent comorbidity, followed by diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF). Data related to the baseline characteristics of the study participants can be found in Table 1 . The prevalence of AF after reviewing the electrocardiograms was 6.7%.

Table 1
– Clinical and demographic profile of the population

Baseline characteristics	n (%)	Median (IQR*)
Serum creatinine (mg/dl)	295(100)	8.1(5.7-10.5)
Age (years)	295(100)	63(53-71)
BMI† (kg/m2)	273(92.5)	24.65(21.59-28.30)
Time from onset of RRT‡ (months)	181(61.3)	30(12-60)
Gender female	125(42.4)
Gender male	170(57.6)
Procedence Passos	109(36.9)
Procedence non-Passos	184(62.3)
Smoking	130(44)
Most prevalent comorbities
Hypertension	267(90.5)
Diabetes	144(48.8)
HF	91(30.8)
Acute myocardial infarction	49(16.6)

• IQR*: interquartile range; BMI†: body mass index; RRT‡: renal replacement therapy; HF: heart failure. Source: Drafted by the author.

Only 1 patient had a previous diagnosis of intermittent AF in 24-hour Holter monitoring, and 1 patient presented an atrial flutter. A high thromboembolic risk was observed in the sample. All women had a CHA₂DS₂VASC score ≥ 4. As for male patients, only one patient had a CHA₂DS₂VASC = 1, whereas others had a score ≥ 2. The HASBLED score showed a high risk of hemorrhage in 70% of the patients with AF. These data are summarized in Table 2 .

Table 2
– Clinical profile of patients with AF

Baseline characteristics	n (%)	Median (IQR*)
CHA2DS2-VASC	20(100)	4(3-5)
HASBLED	20(100)	3(2-4)
Serum cratinine (mg/dl)	20(100)	7.5(5.6-10.2)
Age (years)	20(100)	72(68-79)
BMI† (kg/m2)	18(90)	24.8(22-28.8)
Time from onset of RRT‡ (months)	20(100)	36(11.2-72.7)
Anticoagulation	3(15)
Female Gender	5(25)
Male Gender	15(75)
Procedence Passos	7(35)
Procedence non-Passos	13(65)
Smoking	11(55)
CHA2DS2-VASC SCORE
0	0(0)
1	1(5)
≥2	19(95)
HASBLED SCORE
0-1	1(5)
2	5(25)
≥3	14(70)
Most prevalent comorbities
Hypertension	17(85)
HF	14(70)
Diabetes	6(30)
Acute myocardial infarction	6(30)

• ^*†‡

Anticoagulation was present in 13 patients, of whom 5 were taking apixaban and 8 were taking warfarin. Of these, 3 patients had a diagnosis of AF, two of whom on apixaban therapy and one with warfarin, due to a mechanical heart valve and an aortic prosthesis. Among the other anticoagulated patients, two had mechanical heart valves and six had previous episodes of thrombosis.

The Chi-square test showed that AF was associated with HF and age over 65 years, and anticoagulation was associated with AF ( Table 3 ).

Table 3
Variables associated with AF

	AF		Chi-square test	p
	Yes	No
HF
Yes	14	77	15.417	<0.001
No	6	198
Age
<65	3	162	14.584	<0.001
≥65	17	113
Anticoagulation
Yes	3	10	5.715	<0.01
No	17	265

• AF: atrial fibrillation; HF: heart failure. Source: Drafted by the author.

Discussion

Patient characteristics and the prevalence of AF in the setting of patients with ESRD who were undergoing dialysis was evaluated in this study. Three aspects can be revealed in this study. First, the clinical profile of the patients was described, as shown in Table 1 .

The high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus, as well as a sample consisting predominantly of men, who were elderly and smokers, are risk factors for the development of AF.¹³ In addition, despite the differences in the literature, according to a meta-analysis by Ng et al.¹⁴ hemodialysis is more associated with the development of AF when compared to peritoneal dialysis, present in 8 of the 295 patients undergoing treatment.

The prevalence of AF in this study was 6.7%. This is similar to previous studies, with a prevalence range of 3.5-27%.⁵ , ¹⁵ , ¹⁶ Several authors have emphasized the underdiagnosis of this arrhythmia in the population of ESRD who were undergoing dialysis, which contributes to the remarkable fluctuation in the prevalence rate, a fact that is also attributable to the methodological design of the surveys.¹⁵ - ¹⁷

HF and age over 65 years were statistically associated with AF. Cardiovascular involvement requires attention due to the impact on the morbidity and mortality of the ESRD population undergoing dialysis. That is, cardiovascular disease is the most prevalent group of diseases and the leading cause of death in these patients. In addition, the relationship between AF and HF is highlighted, as AF contributes to a worsening of the cardiac function.¹⁸ Advanced age has a triple role in the scenario of renal failure by contributing as a risk factor to the development of cardiovascular diseases, an increased risk of bleeding, and thromboembolic events.¹³ , ¹⁸

The median CHA₂DS₂VASC = 4 and HASBLED = 3 points to a paradoxical high risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with ESRD and AF.¹³ The CHA₂DS₂VASC score was similar to that obtained in the control and intervention groups of the first randomized clinical trial with the ESRD population, which evaluated the safety profile of apixaban versus warfarin - RENAL-AF (NCT:02942407).¹⁹ However, differences in population size must be emphasized.

Considering only the median of CHA₂DS₂VASC = 4 in most patients with AF from this study, thromboembolic prophylaxis would be recommended. Although such scores are used in the assessment of the population with AF, the high coexistence, especially of cardiovascular comorbidities in ESRD, makes the results of the score doubtful.¹⁶ , ²⁰

Anticoagulation was statistically associated with AF. The concomitance of ESRD and AF restrict the use of these drugs, since they depend on renal clearance to purify the patient’s metabolic activity. When the renal function is reduced, the risk of bleeding increases significantly.²¹ Based on this, clinical trials that, to a great extent, investigated the profile of the new anticoagulants commonly excluded patients with a glomerular filtration rate < 30, that is, stage IV and V CVD.⁶ - ⁹

Among the other anticoagulants, warfarin stands out due to extrarenal metabolism and elimination;²¹ however, its use increases the risk of anticoagulant-related nephropathy,²² vascular calcification,²³ platelet dysfunction, increased risk of bleeding,²⁴ , ²⁵ and hemorrhagic stroke.²⁵ Thus, the warfarin regimen remains uncertain, considering the risks and the imprecision concerning the real efficacy to prevent thromboembolic events and predisposition to hemorrhagic events, as suggested by meta-analyses and other studies.²⁴ - ²⁶

Recent guidelines are divergent regarding the level of scientific evidence on the use of both warfarin and NOACS (Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants) in the ESRD setting. A 2019 publication by the American Heart Association, in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society, presents an intermediate level of evidence (B-NR) and a weak recommendation class (IIb) for both apixaban and warfarin, with an international normalized ratio (INR) between 2 and 3, considering the CHA₂DS₂VASC ≥ 2 for men and ≥ 3 for women.²⁷ In the United States of America, apixaban has already been used in patients with AF who are undergoing dialysis.²⁸

However, the 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society guidelines, together with the Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines as well as the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines, refute the use of both the NOACS and warfarin in patients with ESRD who are undergoing dialysis, given the scarcity of studies published on the subject.²⁹

Thus, due to the lack of robust scientific evidence to guide medical management, there were no anticoagulated patients due to AF. Given the worldwide prevalence of AF associated with ESRD and its clinical outcomes, randomized clinical trials have been carried out.³⁰ - ³²

Recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses³³ , ³⁴ state that the efficacy of new oral anticoagulants is not inferior to warfarin. However, other publications³⁵ - ³⁷ state that anticoagulation in patients with AF and ESRD still remains controversial in daily practice. The present study aims to understand the clinical and sociodemographic profile of patients with AF and ESRD, providing tools for a better treatment of these patients according to current scientific literature.

The limitations inherent to this study are: it is exploratory, observational, and descriptive, which restricts it to only make associations and not establish a causal effect. In addition, the electrocardiogram was performed during the hemodialysis session, while the 24-hour Holter monitoring was unavailable for all patients to screen paroxysmal AF, possibly leading to an underdiagnosis of this arrhythmia.

Conclusion

AF was present in 6.7% of the population, despite the clinical risk profile. The thromboembolic and bleeding scores have demonstrated a high risk in these patients. Considering the absence of strong scientific evidence, the non-anticoagulation approach of patients with AF has been commonly adopted in this service. Further studies on the efficacy and safety of anticoagulants are necessary to improve the management of patients with AF and ESRD.

References

• ¹
  Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics — 2019 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2019 Mar 5;139(10). doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659.
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659
• ²
  Watanabe H, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, Nagai K, Roden DM, Aizawa Y. Close bidirectional relationship between chronic kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: The Niigata preventive medicine study. Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):629–36. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.031.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.06.031
• ³
  Shang W, Li L, Huang S, Zeng R, Huang L, Ge S, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. PLoS One. 2016 May 13;11(5):e0155581. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155581.
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155581
• ⁴
  Potpara TS, Ferro CJ, Lip GYH. Use of oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation and renal dysfunction. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018 May;14(5):337–51. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2018.19.
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2018.19
• ⁵
  Winkelmayer WC, Patrick AR, Liu J, Brookhart MA, Setoguchi S. The Increasing Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation among Hemodialysis Patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Feb;22(2):349–57. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010050459.
  » https://doi.org/10.1681/ASN.2010050459
• ⁶
  Giugliano RP, Ruff CT, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Wiviott SD, Halperin JL, et al. Edoxaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2093–104. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310907.
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1310907
• ⁷
  Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJV, Lopes RD, Hylek EM, Hanna M, et al. Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 15;365(11):981–92. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107039.
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1107039
• ⁸
  Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J, Pan G, Singer DE, Hacke W, et al. Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011 Sep 8;365(10):883–91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1009638.
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1009638
• ⁹
  Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1139–51. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0905561
• ¹⁰
  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Adjusted-dose warfarin versus low-intensity, fixed-dose warfarin plus aspirin for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 1996 Sep 7;348(9028):633–38. PMID: 8782752.
• ¹¹
  Hart RG, Pearce LA, Asinger RW, Herzog CA. Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Moderate Chronic Kidney Disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Nov;6(11):2599–604. doi: 10.2215/CJN.02400311.
  » https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.02400311
• ¹²
  IBM Corp. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
• ¹³
  Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373–498. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612
• ¹⁴
  Ng CH, Ong ZH, Sran HK, Wee TB. Comparison of cardiovascular mortality in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021 Jul;53(7):1363–71. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02683-9.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02683-9
• ¹⁵
  Königsbrügge O, Ay C. Atrial fibrillation in patients with end‐stage renal disease on hemodialysis: Magnitude of the problem and new approach to oral anticoagulation. J Thromb Haemost. 2019 Aug 18;3(4):578–88. doi: 10.1002/rth2.12250.
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/rth2.12250
• ¹⁶
  Königsbrügge O, Posch F, Antlanger M, Kovarik J, Klauser-Braun R, Kletzmayr J, et al. Prevalence of Atrial Fibrillation and Antithrombotic Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients: Cross-Sectional Results of the Vienna Investigation of Atrial Fibrillation and Thromboembolism in Patients on HemodIalysis (VIVALDI). PLoS One. 2017 Jan 4;12(1):e0169400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169400.
• ¹⁷
  Chang C-H, Fan P-C, Lin Y-S, Chen S-W, Lin M-S, Wu M, et al. Atrial fibrillation and associated outcomes in patients with peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: a 14-year nationwide population-based study. J Nephrol. 2021 Fev;34(1):53–62. doi: 10.1007/s40620-020-00713-4.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-020-00713-4
• ¹⁸
  Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2012 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int. Suppl. 2013;3(1):1–150. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2012.184259
  » https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2012.184259
• ¹⁹
  ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT 02942407. Trial to Evaluate Anticoagulation Therapy in Hemodialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (RENAL‐AF). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02942407?cond=renal+af&draw=2&rank=1
  » https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02942407?cond=renal+af&draw=2&rank=1
• ²⁰
  Jong Y, Fu EL, Diepen MV, Trevisan M, Szummer K, Dekker FW, et al. Validation of risk scores for ischaemic stroke in atrial fibrillation across the spectrum of kidney function. Eur Heart J. 2021 Apr 14;42(15):1476–85. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab059
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehab059
• ²¹
  Chan KE, Giugliano RP, Patel MR, Abramson S, Jardine M, Zhao S, et al. Nonvitamin K Anticoagulant Agents in Patients With Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease or on Dialysis With AF. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jun 21;67(24):2888–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.082.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.082
• ²²
  Brodsky SV. Anticoagulants and acute kidney injury: clinical and pathology considerations. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;33(4):174–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.krcp.2014.11.001.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.krcp.2014.11.001
• ²³
  Nigwekar SU, Kroshinksy D, Nazarian RM, Goverman J, Malhotra R, Jackson VA, et al. Calciphylaxis: Risk Factors, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015 Jul;66(1):133–46. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034.
  » https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034
• ²⁴
  Hu A, Niu J, Winkelmayer WC. Oral Anticoagulation in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease on Dialysis and Atrial Fibrillation. Semin Nephrol. 2018 Nov;38(6):618–28. DOI: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.08.006.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2018.08.006
• ²⁵
  Meersch HVD, Bacquer DD, Vriese ASD. Vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2017 Feb;184:37–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.09.016.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2016.09.016
• ²⁶
  Harel Z, Chertow GM, Shah PS, Harel S, Dorian P, Yan AT, et al. Warfarin and the Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Can J Cardiol. 2017 Jun;33(6):737–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.004.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2017.02.004
• ²⁷
  January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Jr Cleveland JC, et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society in Collaboration With the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Circulation. 2019 Jul 9;140(2):e125-e151. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
• ²⁸
  Siontis KC, Zhang X, Eckard A, Bhave N, Schaubel DE, He K, et al. Outcomes Associated With Apixaban Use in Patients With End-Stage Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation in the United States. Circulation. 2018 Oct 9;138(15):1519–29. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035418.
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035418
• ²⁹
  Andrade JG, Aguilar M, Atzema C, Bell A, Cairns JA, Cheung CC, et al. The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation. Can J Cardiol. 2020 Dec;36(12):1847–1948. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.09.001
• ³⁰
  ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT02933697. Compare Apixaban and Vitamin‐K Antagonists in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and End‐Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) (AXADIA). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02933697?term=02933697&draw=2&rank=1
  » https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02933697?term=02933697&draw=2&rank=1
• ³¹
  ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT02886962. Oral Anticoagulation in Haemodialysis Patients (AVKDIAL). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02886962?term=02886962&draw=2&rank=1
  » https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02886962?term=02886962&draw=2&rank=1
• ³²
  ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Identifier NCT03987711. Strategies for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in patients Receiving Dialysis (SAFE-D). Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03987711?term=03987711&draw=2&rank=1
  » https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03987711?term=03987711&draw=2&rank=1
• ³³
  Chen C, Cao Y, Zheng Y, Dong Y, Ma J, Zhu W, et al. Effect of Rivaroxaban or Apixaban in Atrial Fibrillation Patients with Stage 4–5 Chronic Kidney Disease or on Dialysis. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2021 Ap;35(2):273–81. DOI: 10.1007/s10557-021-07144-8.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-021-07144-8
• ³⁴
  Chen H-Y, Ou S-H, Huang C-W, Lee P-T, Chou K-J, Lin P-C, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Warfarin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2021 Apr;41(4):341–51. DOI: 10.1007/s40261-021-01016-7.
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01016-7
• ³⁵
  Feldberg J, Patel P, Farrell A, Sivarajahkumar S, Cameron K, Ma J, et al. A systematic review of direct oral anticoagulant use in chronic kidney disease and dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2019 Feb 1;34(2):265–77. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfy031.
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy031
• ³⁶
  Ha JT, Neuen BL, Cheng LP, Jun M, Toyama T, Gallagher MP, et al. Benefits and Harms of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019 Aug 6;171(3):181-89. DOI: 10.7326/M19-0087.
  » https://doi.org/10.7326/M19-0087
• ³⁷
  Kumar S, Lim E, Covic A, Verhamme P, Gale CP, Camm AJ, et al. Anticoagulation in Concomitant Chronic Kidney Disease and Atrial Fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2204–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1031.
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1031

• Study Association
  This study is not associated with any thesis or dissertation work.
• Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
  This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Passos under the protocol number 3.740.556.CAAE: 26364819.5.0000.8043. All the procedures in this study were in accordance with the 1975 Helsinki Declaration, updated in 2013. Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

• Sources of Funding: There were no external funding sources for this study.

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  15 May 2023
• Date of issue
  2023

History

• Received
  19 Sept 2022
• Reviewed
  19 Jan 2023
• Accepted
  15 Feb 2023