INTRODUCTION
Temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD) is a set of clinical signs and symptoms involving the masticatory muscles, the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and associated structures1. Currently, TMD is basically divided into two groups, which are joint and muscle dysfunction2. Symptoms most frequently reported by patients are muscle fatigue, facial pain, headache, TMJ pain, and chewing muscle pain. Ear pain, mandibular movement limitation, tinnitus may be present in some cases, especially in joint dysfunction3.
It is important to know some of the factors that can contribute to the development and maintenance of TMD, such as teeth clenching, bruxism (grinding or clenching), biting foreign objects such as pens or nails, chewing gum, head posture or presenting factors related to stress, depression, and anxiety or traumatic events, malocclusions and occlusal maladjustments, such as missing teeth4-6.
Because TMD have a multifactorial etiology, they require an interdisciplinary therapeutic approach through a team of several specialties, or at least close collaboration7. The use of interocclusal splints is the most used treatment in dentistry, as they cause local muscle relaxation and relief of muscle pain. Others act presumably more centrally, including acupuncture8-10.
The use of occlusal splints comprises a treatment modality with a high success rate in reducing muscle TMD symptoms, but it is only effective when used correctly11-13. However, there are still patients who do not respond to treatment with splints, so it is necessary to institute other treatment modalities5,14,16. Occlusal splint therapy temporarily reduces muscle hyperactivity through peripheral changes arising from afferent impulse changes in the organic receptors, leading to an efferent response that reduces muscle tension in the region in question. The association of the splint with other treatments has also been widely used. It is necessary to offer the patient a treatment capable of reducing his/her limitations, relieving pain, and discomfort in order to improve his/her quality of life17. Acupuncture is considered as a holistic science and therapy that preaches mental and emotional balance through the harmony of the patient’s energy flow in the energy channels. Energy channels are webs that run through the body, the internal organs, and viscera (Zang Fu) and coincide with the topography of nerve plexuses that control the body’s functioning18.
Acupuncture, unlike the occlusal splint, acts through the central mechanism of pain inhibition, involving segmental blockage in the spinal cord. This causes the release of neuromodulators, such as endorphins and serotonin, which alter pain sensitivity through the central mechanism of analgesia19.
Acupuncture has anti-inflammatory, anxiolytic, myorelaxant, and immune function activating effects, being an alternative, integrative, and complementary therapy used to treat TMD. It is based on the principle of uniting, integrating and solidifying all dental technical and scientific knowledge with those of the Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), aiming at the best results for the patient, better quality of life, well-being and health20,21. Because it is a natural technique and addresses the patient as a whole (physically, mentally, and emotionally), it acts in a noninvasive and reversible manner, both on local and systemic factors, in which the most commonly used therapeutic modalities fail to achieve efficiently. According to TCM, human beings must be viewed and treated in a holistic, integral way, as they have an indivisible physical, mental, emotional origin and are an integral and active part of their physical, natural, and psychosocial environment22-24.
Based on the literature, this study aimed to compare the effects of acupuncture on occlusal splint in the treatment of patients with muscle TMD.
METHODS
Thirty-four individuals were screened in the TMD extension project (SERDOF) of the School of Dentistry (FAODO) of the University of Mato Grosso do Sul, who presented a clinical picture of muscle TMJ pain and dysfunction. After being evaluated by the Research Diagnostic Criteria (RDC/TMD) exam and signing the Free and Informed Consent Term (FICT), the patients participated in the random selection of the research groups.
The sample size was determined with the SPSS software version 24.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, EUA) by the t-test calculation, accepting a sample mean of pain score decrease in the visual analog scale (VAS) after treatment of TMD of 5.29±0.43, population mean of 5.0, significance level of 5% and power of 80%, resulting in a minimum sample of 17 participants for each group.
The inclusion criteria were being diagnosed with muscle TMD and being over 18 years old. The exclusion criteria were the previous treatment of TMD, have fibromyalgia, pregnant women; individuals using neuromuscular drugs; cancer patients.
The patients were randomized by simple draw into two groups: G1: n=17, who underwent massage treatment, thermotherapy, counseling, and occlusal device. The patients were instructed to use the myorelaxant splint at night (Figure 1).
Participants received counseling and self-care guidance. The occlusal splints were of 2mm thick acetate from Bio.art brand, and all were reinforced with a mean 2mm thick acrylic layer to improve their strength and smoothness. No semi-adjustable articulator was used to make the splints. A single skilled and experienced RDC/TMD professional installed and adjusted the splints, carefully checking the highest number of contact points, and the protrusion and laterality of jaw movements. After the splints were installed, patients were instructed to use only at night and return for follow-up and possible adjustments every 15 days. Patients were reevaluated after six weeks and four months of treatment. G2 (n=17) underwent acupuncture sessions once a week for 30 minutes. There were six acupuncture sessions. The treatment was performed with 0.25x15mm disposable needles (acupuncture needles) of DongBang Xu li Ltda brand, at points called acupoints. The skin was previously cleansed with 70% ethyl alcohol by a specialized professional. In each session, the patients remained for 30 minutes lying down and relaxed. The selected points followed the TCM diagnostic protocol. The selected points were:
a) for local pain, stomach meridian E7 (Xianguan); a local meridian point of the stomach that improves ear and TMJ functions, relieves muscle spasm of the masseter, decreases jaw motor imbalance and decreases pain25.
b) systemic points: VG20 (Baihui) - governing vessel channel (Figure 2). A systemic point indicated to calm the mind, reduce stress, improve sleep, calm thoughts, soothe the spirit, relax muscles25. TA5 (Waiguan) - triple heater channel (Figure 3). Systemic point for the treatment of pain and irritability, treatment of otitis, tinnitus, reduces headache, treatment of neck and shoulder muscle pain25. IG4 (Hegu) - large intestine channel (Figure 4). A systemic point that strengthens the immune system, anti-inflammatory point of the upper limbs, analgesia, calms the mind, promotes labor (contraindicated in pregnant women), regulates the stomach and intestine channels, regulates the uterus, treats tinnitus and deafness, treats the flu, sinusitis, rhinitis, anxiety, and neck muscle pain25. E36 (Zusanli) - stomach channel (Figure 5). Systemic point regulates the immune system, regulates the intestines, increases energy. According to Chinese belief, this point is the point of vitality, strength, and long life, rebalances the mind, decreases fever, treats depressive disorders25. F3 (Taichong) - liver channel (Figure 6). A systemic point that regulates menstruation, treats menstrual cramps, calms the mind, treats headaches, treats irritability, treats insomnia, reduces worry, rebalances the mind25.
The points are applied bilaterally, except for the central point VG20, totaling 11 points for pain, anxiety, and stress, following the TCM criteria. Patients were reevaluated after six weeks and four months of treatment.
Both groups were evaluated and treated by the same professional, dental surgeon and acupuncture specialist by the Instituto Brasileiro de Técnicas Médicas (IBRATE) and volunteer of SERDOF-DTM (Serviço de Dor Orofacial e Disfunção Temporomandibular) at UFMS.
After the reevaluations, the results were statistically analyzed.
The visual analog scale (VAS) and the pressure algometer were used to evaluate the pain perception of the volunteers.
The VAS assists in the measurement of pain intensity in the patient to check his/her evolution during treatment and each service, in a practical way. To use the VAS, the researcher must ask the volunteer what his/her degree of pain is, zero means no pain, and 10 the maximum tolerable pain level. The study patients were instructed to mark their pain grade on the day of each evaluation.
The pressure algometer is a device designed to quantify and document sensitivity levels by measuring the pressure threshold and pain sensitivity, measuring tolerance, to check the temporal muscle pain threshold (anterior and middle bundles), and the masseter (medium and inferior fibers).
The patients’ mouth opening limitation was evaluated using the caliper before treatment, after 6 weeks of treatment and 4 months after treatment. It is a very accurate tool that measures the distance between two symmetrically opposite sides of an object. In the case of the mouth opening, the reference was the distance between the upper and lower incisors.
The research was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (CEP/UFMS) CAAE number: 89598418.6.0000.0021.
Statistical analysis
Data were tabulated in a Microsoft Excel 2010 spreadsheet (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond/Washington/Estados Unidos) and analyzed by the Statistical Package for Social Science Version 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago/Illinois/ Estados Unidos). Initially, descriptive statistics of the collected data were performed using measures of central tendency and dispersion.
In order to verify the association of quantitative variables between G1 and G2, the t-test was used for normal distribution (mouth opening) for independent samples; and for comparison between the evaluation periods (baseline of treatment, after six weeks and 4 months, two by two), the t-test for paired samples was used. For the non-normal distribution (VAS and tension threshold), the Mann-Whitney test was used in the two groups, and for the comparison between the evaluation periods (baseline of treatment, after six weeks and 4 months), the Friedman test was used at a significance level of 5%.
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the mean and standard deviation of mouth opening measurements at baseline, after 6 weeks and after 4 months of treatment in G1 and G2. G1 was treated with massage, thermotherapy, counseling, and occlusal splint, and G2 underwent acupuncture.
Table 1 Mean and standard deviation of mouth opening measurements at baseline, after 6 weeks and after 4 months of treatment by type of intervention
Values (mm) | G1 (n=17) | G2 (n=17) | (1) p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Painless mouth opening | |||||
Baseline | a36.6 | 7.8 | a35.5 | 6.3 | 0.651 |
After 6 weeks | b42.2 | 6.5 | b44.1 | 5.7 | 0.377 |
After 4 months | b41.4 | 7.2 | b42.9 | 6.6 | 0.539 |
p(2) | (3)0.007; (4)0.046; (5)0.623 | (3)<0.001; (4)0.001; (5)0.408 | |||
Maximum mouth opening | |||||
Baseline | a45.9 | 8.0 | a44.1 | 6.3 | 0.479 |
After 6 weeks | b50.4 | 6.6 | b51.2 | 5.3 | 0.692 |
After 4 months | b49.8 | 6.6 | b50.6 | 7.9 | 0.743 |
p(2) | (3)0.016; (4)0.048; (5)0.704 | (3)<0.001; (4)0.004; (5)0.639 |
(1)t-test for independent samples (acupuncture versus occlusal splint);
(2)t-test for paired samples. Different letters indicate statistically significant difference. Equal letters indicate statistically not significant difference;
(3)p-value of t-test for paired samples (baseline versus after 6 weeks of treatment);
(4)p-value of t-test for paired samples (baseline versus after 4 months of treatment);
(5)p-value of t-test for paired samples (6 weeks of treatment versus after 4 months of treatment).
There was no difference in mouth opening measures according to the type of treatment used. However, in both groups (acupuncture and occlusal splint), there was an increase in mouth opening measures after 6 weeks of treatment. There was no difference in mouth opening values after 6 weeks and at the end of treatment after 4 months (Table 1).
Table 2 shows the mean and standard deviation of the VAS scores at baseline, after six weeks of treatment, and at the end, after 4 months of treatment, in both groups.
Table 2 Mean and standard deviation of visual analog scale scores at baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment by type of intervention
VAS scores | G1 (n=17) | G2 (n=17) | (1)p-value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
Baseline | a6.2 | 2.6 | a5.9 | 1.7 | 0.679 |
After 6 weeks | b2.6 | 2.0 | b1.9 | 1.5 | 0.459 |
After 4 months | b1.2 | 1.1 | b1.5 | 1.3 | 0.959 |
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
(1)Mann-Whitney test for independent samples (acupuncture versus occlusal splint);
(2)Friedman test for paired samples (baseline versus after 6 weeks of treatment; baseline versus after 4 months of treatment; 6 weeks of treatment versus after 4 months of treatment); different letters indicate statistically significant difference; equal letters indicate statistically not significant difference.
There was no difference in the VAS scores according to the type of treatment used. However, in both groups (acupuncture and occlusal splint), scores decreased after six weeks of treatment. There was no difference in the VAS scores after six weeks and at the end of treatment after four months (Table 2).
Table 3 shows the mean and standard deviation of the masseter and temporal muscle tension threshold scores at baseline, after six weeks, and at the end of treatment in G1 and G2.
Table 3 Mean and standard deviation of tension threshold scores at baseline, after 6 weeks and after 4 months of treatment according to the type of intervention and muscle evaluated
VAS scores | G1 (n=17) | G2 (n=17) | (1)p-value | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||||||||
Right masseter muscle (Mc) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a1.8 | 0.9 | a2.0 | 1.3 | 0.904 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b3.2 | 0.8 | b3.1 | 1.3 | 0.630 | ||||||
After 4 months | b3.3 | 1.3 | b3.7 | 2.1 | 0.679 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||
Right masseter muscle (Md) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a1.8 | 1.1 | a2.0 | 0.9 | 0.286 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b3.3 | 1.7 | a.b2.8 | 1.2 | 0.294 | ||||||
After 4 months | b3.0 | 1.0 | b3.5 | 1.9 | 0.438 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | 0.007 | |||||||||
Left masseter muscle (Mc) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a1.8 | 0.8 | a1.8 | 0.7 | 0.836 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b3.1 | 0.9 | b3.2 | 1.5 | 0.810 | ||||||
After 4 months | b3.3 | 1.1 | b3.5 | 1.6 | 0.959 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
Left masseter muscle (Md) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a1.5 | 0.7 | a1.8 | 0.9 | 0.389 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b3.0 | 0.9 | b3.0 | 1.3 | 0.459 | ||||||
After 4 months | b3.0 | 1.1 | b3.5 | 1.7 | 0.491 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
Right temporal muscle (Ta) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a3.1 | 1.0 | a3.3 | 1.1 | 0.796 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b5.7 | 1.4 | b5.0 | 1.9 | 0.185 | ||||||
After 4 months | a.b4.7 | 1.6 | b5.7 | 2.1 | 0.203 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
Right temporal muscle (Tb) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a2.6 | 1.1 | a2.8 | 1.1 | 0.836 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b4.6 | 1.2 | b4.3 | 2.0 | 0.263 | ||||||
After 4 months | b3.9 | 1.6 | b4.6 | 1.8 | 0.163 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | 0.001 | |||||||||
Left temporal muscle (Ta) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a2.8 | 1.1 | a3.0 | 1.2 | 0.679 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b5.1 | 1.2 | b4.5 | 1.7 | 0.073 | ||||||
After 4 months | b4.9 | 2.0 | b5.1 | 1.7 | 0.547 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||||||
Left temporal muscle (Tb) | |||||||||||
Baseline | a2.4 | 1.1 | a2.5 | 1.2 | 0.960 | ||||||
After 6 weeks | b4.7 | 1.2 | b3.8 | 1.6 | 0.040 | ||||||
After 4 months | b4.0 | 1.8 | b4.7 | 1.7 | 0.191 | ||||||
p(2) | <0.001 | <0.001 |
(1)Mann Whitney test for independent samples (acupuncture versus occlusal splint). p-value in bold indicates statistically significant difference;
(2)Friedman test for paired samples (baseline versus after 6 weeks of treatment; baseline versus after 4 months of treatment; 6 weeks of treatment versus after 4 months of treatment); different letters indicate statistically significant difference (p value in bold); equal letters indicate statistically non-significant difference (p value without bold).
There was no difference in tension threshold scores between G1 (acupuncture) and G2 (occlusal splint), except for the left temporal muscle (Tb), in which the value obtained in G1 (4.7±1.2) was higher compared to G2 (3.8±1.6) at evaluation after six weeks of treatment. However, after four months, there was no difference in values.
In the evaluation of the studied period of G1 and G2 separately, there was an increase in tension threshold scores for the evaluated muscles, masseter, and temporal, after six weeks of treatment. However, the values were similar to those obtained after four months (Table 3).
DISCUSSION
Pain caused by TMD is musculoskeletal pain that affects deep tissue and, in chronic cases, generates a biopsychosocial process that interferes with patients’ normal daily activities26-28. Chronic pain should be diagnosed and treated correctly, as TMD pain can significantly compromise the person’s quality of life29-31.
In a randomized clinical study, 40 patients diagnosed with muscle TMD by RDC/TMD were treated. The patients were divided into two groups. One group received placebo treatment, and the other, acupuncture. Patients were evaluated by the VAS to measure pain before and after treatment. The following acupuncture points were selected: E6, E7, ID18 (local points); VB20, VG20, B10 and IG4 (distance points). Patients were treated for four weeks, with sessions lasting 30 minutes each. The patients were reevaluated after 30 days. There was a significant difference between the groups (p=0.2261), and in the acupuncture group, pain decreased from 5.3 to 1.8 on mean, according to VAS, while in the placebo group, pain remained stable or increased9.
Twenty TMD patients were evaluated before treatment, immediately after treatment and 12 months after acupuncture treatment using the VAS. At the initial consultation, an anamnesis was performed according to the TCM standards, and the patient’s pain intensity was identified. At the end of treatment of six sessions of 20 minutes each, the patients were reevaluated and after 12 months as well. The means for VAS0, VAS1, and VAS2 were respectively 5.9; 1.65; 2.45. There was a statistical difference between VAS0 and VAS1 of p<0.01 and between VAS2 (p<0.01), but there was no difference between VAS1 and VAS (p>0.05). The authors pointed out that the acupuncture treatment reduced pain after six weeks of treatment and remained for a mean of 12 months32,33. This study presented results similar to the one conducted at UFMS, as patients showed improvement in pain in the acupuncture group in the 6-week reevaluation and remained in the 4-month evaluation.
A descriptive study of 31 TMD patients used the VAS before and after treatment to evaluate pain intensity. The patients underwent three acupuncture sessions, 20 minutes each per week. They underwent anamnesis and diagnosis of the TCM, and the selected points were heart channel C7, pericardial channel PC6, small intestine channel ID3, gallbladder channel VB20, and triple heater channel TA23. The pain ceased (VAS=0) in 67.7% of the cases. There was a reduction in pain intensity with VASi of the 1st session (6.10±2.64) than VASf of the 3rd session (1.16±1.98). The authors concluded that a minimum of 3 acupuncture sessions is sufficient to reduce pain intensity, regardless of its degree34.
In a clinical trial, ten patients with TMD, diagnosed by RDC/TDM, and using the VAS were treated. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, the first group consisting of five patients treated only with physical therapy (massage) for three weeks and the second, also consisting of five patients treated with occlusal splint alone. The study showed that patients who received treatment with physical therapy alone did not reset their pain after treatment; but there was an average decrease of 92.5% in pain. In patients who received treatment with the occlusal splint, there was a 92% improvement in the first week, and reset pain until the end of treatment. This showed that the occlusal splint is as efficient as physical therapy treatments15.
Acupuncture works to reduce the sensation of pain, and this therapy has been shown effective with conventional TMD treatment techniques35. In one study, 20 TMD patients were treated. One group underwent acupuncture associated with occlusal splint, and one group used only the occlusal splint. The acupuncture group was treated with five sessions of 50 minutes each and occlusal splint for night use. The splint group was instructed to use the device only at night. The limitation of mandibular movements before and after treatment was also evaluated. The degree of pain was verified by the VAS. After the first week of treatment, pain and mandibular movements improved in the acupuncture group. After five weeks of treatment, the patients were reevaluated, and there was a significant reduction in the TMD symptoms, but there were no statistical differences between the two groups (p>0.05). However, in the acupuncture group, pain decreased faster13,15. Just like these results, the UFMS study showed very similar results.
After a systematic literature review, it was observed that there is no standard protocol for acupuncture for the treatment of TMD, that the choice of acupoints varies according to the degree of patient involvement36. Excellent results were obtained using as local points the stomach channel, such as E8; E7, E6; triple heater channel points such as TA21, TA17 and gallbladder channel points such as VB2. These points were used to control local pain. The most frequently applied distance points for the control of anxiety, muscle relaxation, stress reduction, and sleep improvement were the large intestine meridian IG4, stomach E36, triple heater TA5, liver F3, gallbladder VB34, and governing vessel VG20. Based on the literature, Souza e Silva32 found evidence of the use of small intestine ID18, stomach E6, E7, governing vessel VG20, gallbladder VB20, bladder B10 points. Other points may also be employed, such as bladder B60 and gallbladder VB3. The authors also emphasize that acupuncture is an excellent treatment method complementary to other therapies, or as a technique of choice for patients with intolerance to occlusal splints18.
In a case report of a 32-year-old female patient diagnosed with muscular TMD and evaluated by VAS for pain, an anamnesis of the TCM showed the patient’s tongue, pulse, and skin color characteristics.
When evaluating 20 patients who underwent six 30-minute acupuncture sessions, it was observed after six weeks that the pain threshold and muscle tension evaluated by electromyography was statistically better than at baseline and that these improvements remained for 12 months. Similar results were observed in this study, which presented lower VAS index in pain, decreased muscle tension, and improvement in mouth opening at 6 weeks and 4 months after treatment in patients undergoing acupuncture with the same number of sessions and treatment time32,37,38.
This action of acupuncture was also found in a study that observed 40 patients treated with acupuncture and after 4 sessions presented decreased pain and lower muscle tension, which was also observed in this study, in which patients were evaluated at 6 weeks and 4 months. It was found that both acupuncture and occlusal splint associated with massage and thermotherapy provided muscle relaxation, improved jaw movements at mouth opening and decreased pain level of patients21. These results were similar to the study as patients presented improvement in mouth opening, reduced pain and muscle tension in both acupuncture and splint groups.
In a randomized clinical study of 40 TMD patients diagnosed by RDC/TMD, pain was evaluated by the VAS, and the chewing muscles were evaluated by electromyography before and after treatment. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. The first was treated with acupuncture, underwent anamnesis and diagnosis according to the TCM. The patients were treated with four acupuncture sessions lasting 20 minutes each. The selected points were: large intestine meridian IG4 and IG11, small intestine meridian ID19, liver meridian F2, bladder meridian B2, conception vessel meridian VC23, triple heater meridian TA23, gallbladder meridian VB21, and VB34. The splint group was treated with a myorelaxant splint, counseling, and self-care guidance. The splints were conventionally made of acrylic and installed and adjusted by a single professional. Patients were instructed to use the splint at night and to return within four weeks. The patients were reevaluated after 30 days of treatment. The electromyography of the masticatory muscles was lower in 40% in the acupuncture group and 50% in the splint group. Pain decreased in both groups, but there were no statistical differences between the two. However, in the acupuncture group, pain reduction was faster, and the absence of pain lasted longer. Half of the patients in the acupuncture group had improved mandibular limitations. The authors concluded that acupuncture was as efficient as occlusal splint21.