Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Mineralization of S-metolachlor in soil as affected by moisture content, application history, and association with glyphosate

Abstract

Herbicide mineralization in the soil is affected by several factors, including the herbicide application history of the soil, soil moisture, and whether the herbicide is co-applied with another herbicide. The objective of this work was to evaluate S-metolachlor mineralization in the soil as affected by soil moisture content, history of herbicide application, and association with glyphosate. 14C-S-metolachlor mineralization increased with increasing soil moisture content. The average cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor at 63 days of incubation was 0.03, 0.80, and 1.80% in air-dried, field capacity, and saturated soil, respectively. The mineralization rate of S-metolachlor was greater under saturated conditions and affected by the association with glyphosate. Greater mineralization of S-metolachlor occurred in cornfield soil with a history of S-metolachlor application. The average cumulative mineralization was 0.24% in cornfield and 0.89% in non-cultivated area. We can conclude that the higher the soil moisture content the higher S-metolachlor mineralization and that the mixture of this herbicide with glyphosate increased its degradation compared to the application of the herbicide alone. While there is evidence suggesting enhanced degradation of S-metolachlor in soil previously subjected to corn cultivation and S-metolachlor application, drawing a definitive conclusion is challenging due to the influence of sorption observed in our dataset.

Degradation; Herbicide; Environmental Fate; Enhanced Mineralization

1.Introduction

S-metolachlor is a soil-applied herbicide used worldwide for preemergence control of annual grass and small-seeded broadleaf weeds in many crops, including corn, soybean, and cotton (Adegas et al., 2022Adegas FS, Correia NM, Silva AF, Concenço G, Gazziero DLP, Dalazen G. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40(spe):1-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022...
; Bedmar et al., 2011Bedmar F, Daniel PE, Costa JL, Giménez D. Sorption of acetochlor, S-metolachlor, and atrazine in surface and subsurface soil horizons of Argentina. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;30(9):1990-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602...
; Goldreich et al., 2011Goldreich O, Goldwasser Y, Mishael YG. Effect of soil wetting and drying cycles on metolachlor fate in soil applied as a commercial or controlled-release formulation. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):645-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g...
). S-metolachlor is slightly soluble in water (488 mg L-1) and moderately sorbed in most soils with an average Koc of 200 mL g-1. It exhibits low volatility, moderate leaching potential, and is susceptible to photodegradation in the soil surface (Munoz et al., 2011Munoz A, Koskinen WC, Cox L, Sadowsky MJ. Biodegradation and mineralization of metolachlor and alachlor by Candida xestobii. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):619-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w...
; Shaner, 2014Shaner DL. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Champaign: Weed Science Society of America; 2014.; Zemolin et al., 2014a).

Compared to other chloroacetamide herbicides such as alachlor, S-metolachlor is more persistent in soil with a half-life ranging from 2.5 to 289 days (Sanyal, Kulshrestha, 1999; Shaner, 2014Shaner DL. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Champaign: Weed Science Society of America; 2014.). The wide variability reported for chloroacetamide herbicides’ persistence has been attributed to differences in soil management, edaphic factors, and environmental conditions that affect microbial degradation, a major pathway for its dissipation in the environment (Wu et al., 2011Wu XM, Li M, Long YH, Liu RX, Yu YL, Fang H et al. Effects of adsorption on degradation and bioavailability of metolachlor in soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2011;11(3):83-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162011000300007
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-9516201100...
; Alletto et al., 2013Alletto L, Benoit P, Bolognési B, Couffignal M, Bergheaud V, Dumény V et al. Sorption and mineralisation of S-metolachlor in soils from fields cultivated with different conservation tillage systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;128:97-103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11....
; Sun et al., 2019Sun Y, Zhao L, Li X, Hao Y, Xu H, Weng L, Li Y. Stimulation of earthworms ( Eisenia fetida ) on soil microbial communities to promote metolachlor degradation. Environ Pollut. 2019;248:219-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.058
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01...
).

Moisture content plays a vital role in the microbial degradation of herbicides in soil; several results demonstrated that the influence of soil moisture on the degradation of: saflufenacil (Camargo et al., 2013Camargo ER, Senseman SA, Haney RL, Guice JB, Mccauley GN. Soil residue analysis and degradation of saflufenacil as affected by moisture content and soil characteristics. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(12):1291-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3494
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3494...
), sulfentrazone (Martinez et al., 2010Martinez CO, Silva CMMS, Fay EF, Abakerli RB, Maia AHN, Durrant LR. Microbial degradation of sulfentrazone in a Brazilian rhodic hapludox soil. Braz J Microbiol. 2010;41(1):209-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000100030
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-8382201000...
), metsulfuron-methyl (Wang et al., 2010Wang H, Xu J, Yates SR, Zhang J, Gan J, Ma J et al. Mineralization of metsulfuron-methyl in Chinese paddy soils. Chemosphere. 2010;78(3):335-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.20...
), metolachlor (Rice et al., 2002Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR. Degradation and persistence of metolachlor in soil: Effects of concentration, soil moisture, soil depth, and sterilization. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(12):2640-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216...
), imazapic (Sun et al., 2019Sun Y, Zhao L, Li X, Hao Y, Xu H, Weng L, Li Y. Stimulation of earthworms ( Eisenia fetida ) on soil microbial communities to promote metolachlor degradation. Environ Pollut. 2019;248:219-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.058
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01...
), dicamba, imazethapyr, and clodinafop-propargyl (Rao et al., 2019Rao TN, Botsa P, Naidu M. Effect of pH, humic acid and moisture content on photo catalytic degradation of herbicides in loamy sand soil. EQA. 2019;32:15-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8243
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8...
). For S-metolachlor, it has been demonstrated that degradation occurs more rapidly when soil moisture content is higher, with a half-life of 39.4 days at the low moisture content (20% water holding capacity - WHC) and 23.4 days at high moisture content (80% WHC) (Long et al., 2014Long YH, Li RY, Wu XM. Degradation of S-metolachlor in soil as affected by environmental factors. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14(1):189-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000015
https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-9516201400...
). Other research involving S-metolachlor has predominately focused on the sorption and mineralization of primary metabolites to determine their propensity to leach and contaminate groundwater (Bedmar et al., 2011Bedmar F, Daniel PE, Costa JL, Giménez D. Sorption of acetochlor, S-metolachlor, and atrazine in surface and subsurface soil horizons of Argentina. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;30(9):1990-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602
https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602...
; Goldreich et al., 2011Goldreich O, Goldwasser Y, Mishael YG. Effect of soil wetting and drying cycles on metolachlor fate in soil applied as a commercial or controlled-release formulation. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):645-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g...
; Baran, Gourcy, 2013).

Enhanced degradation is another process that may affect the mineralization of soil-applied herbicides. Accelerated or enhanced herbicide degradation consists of faster herbicide degradation in areas where it has been previously applied due to the adaptation of the microbial population to that compound (Bundt et al., 2015Bundt AC, Avila LA, Pivetta A, Agostinetto D, Dick DP, Burauel P. Imidazolinone degradation in soil in response to application history. Planta Daninha. 2015;33(2):341-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-83582015000200020
https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-83582015000...
). After consecutive herbicide applications, enhanced atrazine degradation has been shown under laboratory and field conditions (Krutz et al., 2009Krutz LJ, Burke IC, Reddy KN, Zablotowicz RM, Price AJ. Enhanced atrazine degradation: evidence for reduced residual weed control and a method for identifying adapted soils and predicting herbicide persistence. Weed Sci. 2009;57(4):427-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1...
; Zablotowicz et al., 2006Zablotowicz RM, Weaver MA, Locke MA. Microbial adaptation for accelerated atrazine mineralization/ degradation in Mississippi Delta soils. Weed Sci. 2006;54(3):538-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1...
). The persistence of atrazine in s-triazine–adapted, independent of soil depth, was at least fourfold shorter than that of the non-adapted soil (Krutz et al., 2010Krutz LJ, Shaner DL, Zablotowicz RM. Enhanced degradation and soil depth effects on the fate of atrazine and major metabolites in colorado and mississippi soils. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(4):1369-77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0197
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0197...
). For metolachlor, conflicting results regarding the previous application of the herbicide have been found. (Sanyal, Kulshrestha, 1999) found enhanced degradation for metolachlor, with dissipation half-life in soil decreasing from 18 days after the first application to 2.5 days after the fourth consecutive metolachlor application.

In contrast, Shaner and Henry (2007)Shaner DL, Henry WB. Field history and dissipation of atrazine and metolachlor in Colorado. J Environ Qual. 2007;36(1):128-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0160
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0160...
did not find a clear relationship between metolachlor degradation and history application after an extensive study conducted in Colorado’s agricultural fields in the USA. Previous applications of alachlor or metolachlor did not affect the rate of degradation when the same herbicide was reapplied up to eight times before the experiment (Dowler et al., 1987Dowler CC, Marti LR, Kvien CS, Skipper HD, Gooden DT, Zublena JP. Accelerated degradation potential of selected herbicides in the southeastern United States. Weed Technol. 1987;1(4):350-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00029882
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X0002988...
). Therefore, additional research is required to determine whether previous application influences S-metolachlor degradation in soil.

Since S-metolachlor is degraded via cometabolism (Munoz et al., 2011Munoz A, Koskinen WC, Cox L, Sadowsky MJ. Biodegradation and mineralization of metolachlor and alachlor by Candida xestobii. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):619-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w...
), mixing this herbicide with a readily degradable herbicide such as glyphosate may accelerate its degradation. The mixture of S-metolachlor and glyphosate is a relatively common and efficient tool for weed management (Clewis et al., 2006Clewis SB, Wilcut JW, Porterfield D. Weed management with S -Metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). Weed Technol. 2006;20(1):232-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-030R.1
https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-030R.1...
; Zemolin et al., 2014b). For example, glyphosate’s addition increased the cumulative degradation rate of fluometuron relative to fluometuron alone (Lancaster et al., 2008Lancaster SH, Haney RL, Senseman SA, Kenerley CM, Hons FM. Microbial degradation of fluometuron is influenced by roundup weathermax. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(18):8588-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w...
). For S-metolachlor, a study has demonstrated that association with burndown herbicides such as glyphosate decreased soil persistence under Brazilian conditions (Nunes, Vidal, 2016). It is important to study the combination of S-metolachlor and glyphosate and to study the effect of moisture content as this herbicide is being used in areas prone to excess of water. Thus, this study evaluated the effect of moisture content, history of S-metolachlor application, and association with glyphosate on S-metolachlor mineralization in soil.

2.Material and Methods

2.1 Experimental design

Mineralization and sorption studies were conducted using a completely randomized design in a factorial arrangement with four replications and repeated in time. The mineralization study included two experiments. In experiment I, using the corn-field soil, treatments were combinations between moisture contents (-100 kPa, -33 kPa, 0 kPa) and herbicides (14C-S-metolachlor, and 14C-S-metolachlor plus glyphosate). In experiment II, treatments consisted of combinations between herbicides (14C-S-metolachlor, and 14C-S-metolachlor plus glyphosate) and soil (cornfield with history of S-metolachlor application, and non-cultivated soil without a history of S-metolachlor application). Controls without herbicide treatment were included for the 14C-herbicide mineralization and sorption studies.

2.2 Soil sampling

Two soil samples were collected in 2013 from a corn-soybean farm located in western Bolivar County, Mississippi, near the Mississippi River. Topsoil (0-5 cm) was collected from a cornfield managed using conventional tillage and treated annually with atrazine and S-metolachlor since 2010. This sample was referred to as S-metolachlor “cornfield”. Another soil was collected from a non-cropped grass area immediately across the turnrow that had not been cultivated and had not been treated with S-metolachlor treatment for at least the past five years; We refer this soil as a “non-cultivated area” soil. Sample points were georeferenced with a global position system, and coordinates were 33º44’23.48” N and 90º43’59.17” W and, 33º40’28.46” N and 90º44’03.98” W for the “cornfield” and “non-cultivated” soils, respectively.

The samples were taken to the laboratory, air-dried, and passed through a 2mm-mesh sieve to remove roots and non-decomposed plant residues and stored at room temperature (23 ± 2 ºC) until the beginning of the experiment. Soils were stored for 30 days until the experiment was performed. A representative subsample was submitted to the Mississippi State University Extension Center Soil Testing laboratory in Starkville, Mississippi, to analyze the particle size distribution, organic matter content, pH, and cation exchange capacity. Based on soil survey data (United States Department of Agriculture, 1951United States Department of Agriculture – USDA. Soil survey manual. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture; 1951.), both samples were classified as Brittain silt loam, and their characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1
Soil characterization

2.3 Herbicides

The experiments were conducted with a mixture of 14C-S-metolachlor (phenyl-U-14C) supplied by Syngenta Crop Protection (Greensboro, NC, USA) and technical grades of S-metolachlor and glyphosate (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The specific radioactivity and radiochemical purity of 14C-S-metolachlor were 1,857.4 kBq mg-1 and 99.4%. The chemical purity of S-metolachlor and glyphosate technical grades was 99.1% and 97.6%, respectively. The field rate of both herbicides was applied.

2.4 Mineralization

Twenty-five grams of air-dried weight equivalent soil were placed in a 500-mL glass biometer flask and fortified with a 1.00-mL solution containing either (A) 14C-S-metolachlor + 12C-S-metolachlor or (B) 14C-S-metolachlor + 12C-S-metolachlor plus 12C-glyphosate in methanol solvent. The amount of radioactivity added per biometer flask was 14.06 kBq, equating to 0.30 µg 14C-S-metolachlor per gram of topsoil. Technical-grade S-metolachlor was added to solutions (A) and (B) to result in a final S-metolachlor concentration of 8.4 µg per g of soil which summed corresponded to the herbicide field-rate. Technical-grade glyphosate was added to the solution (B) to produce a final glyphosate concentration of 15.4 µg per g of soil, corresponding to the field-rate of the herbicide. The final herbicide concentrations assumed a labeled rate fully incorporated to a 1.3 cm depth in a silt loam soil.

After spiking, the biometers were kept open in a fume hood for 24 hours at room temperature to allow the methanol solvent to evaporate. The moisture contents were further adjusted with distilled water to air-dried (-100 kPa), field capacity (-33 kPa), and saturated (0 kPa) for experiment I (moisture content) and field capacity (-33 kPa) for experiment II (soil history). Soil water-holding capacity was estimated for each soil using the methods of Saxton et al. (1986)Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50(4):1031-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.036159...
.

The biometers flasks were equipped with glass vials filled with 10 mL of 0.5 M NaOH (sodium hydroxide) to capture evolved CO2. Above each CO2 trap, polyurethane foam plugs were installed to remove non-CO2 volatiles from entering the alkaline traps. The flasks were sealed using aluminum-foil lined stoppers and incubated in the dark at 22 ± 2°C for 63 days. The 14CO2 evolution was measured every seven days by completely removing the NaOH solution via pipet and placing 2 ml of the solution into glass scintillation vials containing 10 mL of Ultima Gold™ liquid scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). The radioactivity in each vial was measured by liquid scintillation spectroscopy (Tri-Carb 2900TR, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA). Radioactivity in each sample was measured until 10,000 counts accumulated or for 20 minutes, whichever came first.

Before use, the polyurethane foam plugs were extracted with MeOH and allowed to air-dry. At each sampling period, the plugs were removed, placed in glass test tubes equipped with Teflon-lined caps, and extracted with 30-mL MeOH for 60 minutes on a rotisserie-style shaker. Radioactivity in the MeOH traps was determined by placing one mL of the MeOH extract into glass scintillation vials containing 10-mL of Ultima Gold™ liquid scintillation cocktail (Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA) and measuring by liquid scintillation spectroscopy as described. Because the foam plugs contained insignificant amounts (i.e., less than 0.01%) of the applied radioactivity, these results are not shown here.

2.5 Mass balance determination

After the final sampling of NaOH, the soil in each flask was dried to a constant weight in a freeze dryer and pulverized using mortar and pestle. A 0.25 g sub-sample from each replication was combusted using a Packard 307 sample oxidizer (Packard Instruments, Chicago, IL, USA). The evolved 14CO2 was trapped in scintillation vials containing 10 mL of Carbo-Sorb and Permafluor (Packard Instruments, Chicago, IL, USA). Radioactivity was determined by liquid scintillation counting (Tri-Carb 2900TR, PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT, USA). The amount of 14CO2 recovered from the combusted samples was added to the cumulative 14CO2 evolved from the terminal time course sampling to determine the 14C mass balance.

2.6 Sorption

S-metolachlor sorption coefficients in the cornfield and the non-cultivated soil were determined using a batch-equilibrium method. The herbicide solutions were prepared in 0.01M CaCl2 with S-metolachlor concentrations of 1.46, 2.92, 5.84, 11.68, and 23.36 µM. 14C-S-metolachlor was added to produce solutions that contained approximately 0.125 kBq mL-1. Technical grade S-metolachlor was added to achieve the respective solution concentrations. A 5-mL aliquot of each solution was added to 1 g of air-dried soil in a glass 15-mL centrifuge tube sealed with a Teflon-lined cap. A 24-h sorption time was used with the slurry mechanically shaken at 30 rotations per minute. After 24 hours, tubes were centrifuged for 10-min at 1,800 x g, and 1-mL aliquots of supernatant removed and added to 10-mL scintillation cocktail (Ultima Gold™ Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). Radioactivity in solution was determined by liquid scintillation spectroscopy (Tri-Carb 2900TR, Perkin Elmer, Shelton, CT, USA). The amount of herbicide adsorbed by the soil was determined calculating the difference between the initial 14C-S-metolachlor concentrations in the fortification solutions and the corresponding final concentrations after equilibrium with the soil. The sorption distribution coefficient (Kd) was calculated using the equation Kd=Cs/Ce, where Cs is the amount of herbicide sorbed by the soil [µg g-1], and Ce is the herbicide concentration in the soil solution at equilibrium [µg mL-1].

The distribution coefficient was determined at each concentration and averaged across all equilibrium concentrations to obtain a single estimate of Kd for each replication.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Cumulative mineralization after 63 days of incubation, and Kd were tested for the assumptions of the ANOVA (normality by Shapiro Wilk test, homogeneity of variances using Hartley’s test, and independence of the errors checked graphically) and followed by the analysis of variance (ANOVA). All the data were normally distributed, and the errors were independent. Linear regression analysis of the percent 14C-S-metolachlor remaining in soil versus time was performed to obtain mineralization rate constant (k). Means were separated by overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The analysis was performed using SAS and the figures produced using GraphPad Prism Version 10.0.1.

3.Results and Discussion

3.1 Effect of moisture content and association with glyphosate on S-metolachlor mineralization

The average 14C recovery for mineralization experiments I and II was 75.5%. Similar results regarding lower 14C recovery of metolachlor have been reported by (Krutz et al., 2006Krutz LJ, Gentry TJ, Senseman SA, Pepper IL, Tierney DP. Mineralisation of atrazine, metolachlor and their respective metabolites in vegetated filter strip and cultivated soil. Pest Manag Sci. 2006;62(6):505-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1193
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1193...
). The mineralization kinetics of S-metolachlor and S-metolachlor plus glyphosate under three soil moisture contents are presented in Figure 1A. During the first 14 days of incubation, the percentage of 14CO2 evolved varied little among the treatments evaluated. However, after 14 days, analysis of variance indicated an interaction between soil moisture content and herbicide treatment for cumulative mineralization of 14C-S-metolachlor (p ≤ 0.001). Under saturated conditions, cumulative mineralization of 14C-S-metolachlor plus glyphosate was greater (p < 0.05) relative to 14C-S-metolachlor alone. The amount of 14CO2 evolved after 63 days was 2.27% for 14C-S-metolachlor plus glyphosate, whereas 1.42% was observed for 14C-S-metolachlor alone (Figure 2). A similar trend was observed for the mineralization rate constant (Table 2).

Figure 1
Kinetics of S-metolachlor alone and in mixture with glyphosate as affected by soil moisture content (A) and soil history (B). Cornfield area received S-metolachlor application for three consecutive years; Non-cultivated soil have been a pasture field for five years and did not receive herbicide application. Data point correspond to eight replications

Figure 2
Cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor alone and associated with glyphosate under air-dried, field capacity, and saturated conditions at 63 days after incubation. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (n = 8)

Table 2
First-order rate constant (k) and adjusted coefficient determination (R2) for S-metolachlor and S-metolachlor plus glyphosate under three moisture levels in soil with different histories of S-metolachlor application

S-metolachlor half-life is directly affected by moisture content (Figure 3A), with greater half-life under saturated and field capacity conditions. There was difference between saturated and field capacity, with half-lives of 30 and 52 days, respectively for the S-metolachlor alone. In mixture with glyphosate half-lives were 19 and 50, for saturated and field capacity conditions, respectively.

Figure 3
14C-S-metolachlor half-life alone and in mixture with glyphosate as affected by the soil moisture content (A) and the history of use(B). Cornfield area received S-metolachlor application for three consecutive years; non-cultivated soil has been a pasture field for five years and did not receive herbicide application. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (n = 8)

These results demonstrated that the association of S-metolachlor with glyphosate increased the mineralization of S-metolachlor under saturated and field-capacity conditions. Similarly, studies have shown that combinations between glyphosate and fluometuron or glyphosate and atrazine enhanced mineralization and provided faster dissipation of the soil-applied herbicides than their application alone (Haney et al., 2000Haney RL, Senseman SA, Hons FM, Zuberer DA. Effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity and biomass. Weed Sci. 2000;48(1):89-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745 (2000)048[0089:EOGOSM]2.0.CO;2
https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745 (2000)...
; Lancaster et al., 2008Lancaster SH, Haney RL, Senseman SA, Kenerley CM, Hons FM. Microbial degradation of fluometuron is influenced by roundup weathermax. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(18):8588-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w...
). Other researchers have reported increased soil microbial biomass, respiration, and carbon and nitrogen mineralization after consecutive glyphosate applications (Haney et al., 2002Haney RL, Senseman SA, Krutz LJ, Hons FM. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by atrazine and glyphosate. Biol Fert Soils. 2002;35:35-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-001-0437-1
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-001-0437-...
; Bonfleur et al., 2015Bonfleur EJ, Tornisielo VL, Regitano JB, Lavorenti A. The effects of glyphosate and atrazine mixture on soil microbial population and subsequent impacts on their fate in a tropical soil. Water Air Soil Poll. 2015;226(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2190-8
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2190-...
; Partoazar et al., 2011Partoazar M, Hoodaji M, Tahmourespour A. The effect of glyphosate application on soil microbial activities in agricultural land. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(83):1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2440
https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2440...
). Therefore, it is plausible that greater cumulative mineralization observed for S-metolachlor plus glyphosate is related to a glyphosate-induced increase in S-metolachlor’s cometabolism. Important to notice that this experiment is in a controlled environment and may not directly transfer to the field at such a level to affect herbicide efficacy.

The cumulative mineralization and mineralization rate constant of S-metolachlor in soil were also affected by moisture content. After 63 days of incubation, cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor was less than 0.04% under air-dried soil regardless of association with glyphosate. Increased S-metolachlor mineralization was observed with the increase of moisture content. The average amount of 14CO2 evolved at field capacity was 0.8%, whereas 1.8% of the applied 14C-S-metolachlor was mineralized in saturated soil.

These results demonstrate that soil moisture content is essential in S-metolachlor mineralization. Greater cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor occurred under saturated conditions. As S-metolachlor exhibits moderate water solubility, the high moisture content in saturated soil may have enhanced herbicide solubilization, reduced adsorption to the soil particles, and increased its availability to micro-organisms.

Many other studies have reported the effect of soil moisture content on herbicide degradation. For metsulfuron-methyl, enhanced mineralization was observed with increased moisture content in paddy soil. Total 14C-metsulfuron-methyl recovered as 14CO2 ranged from 2.2 to 3.6% in soil with 20% water-holding capacity (WHC) and from 3.5 to 6.0% with 50% WHC (Wang et al., 2010Wang H, Xu J, Yates SR, Zhang J, Gan J, Ma J et al. Mineralization of metsulfuron-methyl in Chinese paddy soils. Chemosphere. 2010;78(3):335-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.023
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.20...
). In a study with sulfentrazone, the degradation rate was higher at 80% WHC than at 30% WHC (Brum et al., 2013Brum CS, Franco AA, Scorza Júnior RP. [Degradation of sulfentrazone herbicide in two soils of Mato Grosso do Sul State]. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient. 2013;17(5):558-64. Portuguese. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000500014
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-4366201300...
). This behavior was also verified in a recent study with dicamba, imazethapyr, clodinafop-propargyl, and metsulfuron-methyl, which was degraded faster with the addition of moisture content in loamy sand soil (Rao et al., 2019Rao TN, Botsa P, Naidu M. Effect of pH, humic acid and moisture content on photo catalytic degradation of herbicides in loamy sand soil. EQA. 2019;32:15-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8243
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8...
).

Although there is a lack of consistent information elucidating the processes involved in S-metolachlor mineralization under anaerobiosis, it appears to include a combination of sulfate-reducing bacteria and reductive dechlorination reactions (Stamper, Tuovinen 1998). This is supported by evidence that certain bacteria species effectively remove halogen atoms from halogenated compounds via reductive dehalogenation under anaerobic conditions (Futagami et al., 2008Futagami T, Goto M, Furukawa K. Biochemical and genetic bases of dehalorespiration. Chem Rec. 2008;8(1):1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20134
https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20134...
). This reaction plays a crucial role in the initial degradation of herbicides under anaerobiosis (Mohn, Tiedje, 1992; Middeldorp et al., 1999Middeldorp PJM, Luijten MLGC, Van De Pas BA, Van Eekert MHA, Kengen SWM, Schraa G et al. Anaerobic microbial reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes. Biorem J. 1999;3(2):151-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10889869991219280
https://doi.org/10.1080/1088986999121928...
; Smidt et al., 2000Smidt H, Akkermans ADL, Van Der Oost J, De Vos WM. Halorespiring bacteria-molecular characterization and detection. Enz Microb Technol. 2000;27(10):812-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00316-1
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00...
). Thus, greater mineralization of S-metolachlor under saturated conditions might have resulted from a combination of the aforementioned factors. However, because the redox potentials of soil samples in the present study were not measured, we can only speculate about the nature of reactions that led to these differences.

3.2 Effect of soil history and association with glyphosate on S-metolachlor mineralization

The mineralization kinetics of S-metolachlor alone and in mixture with glyphosate in soils having a history or no history of S-metolachlor application is presented in Figure 1B. According to the analysis of variance, the association with glyphosate did not affect the cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor regardless of soil history (P > 0.050). However, cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor differed among the tested soils (P ≤ 0.001). Non-cultivated soil averaged 0.24% mineralization, the cornfield averaged 0.89% (Figure 4).

Figure 4
Cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor alone and in mixture with glyphosate in soils with and without a history of herbicide application at 63 days after incubation. Cornfield area received S-metolachlor application for three consecutive years; non-cultivated soil has been a pasture field for five years and did not receive herbicide application. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (n = 8)

The first order rate constant for herbicide dissipation showed an effect of history of soil use (Table 2), and the calculated of S-metolachlor had an average of 171 days in non-cultivated soil and 49 days for the cornfield with history of herbicide application (Figure 3B). High mineralization of S-metolachlor in cornfield with a history of S-metolachlor application might have resulted from a microbial population that developed an ability to degrade the herbicide or another compound with a similar chemical structure or due to enhanced sorption as will be discussed later. The enhanced degradation process has been extensively demonstrated to atrazine in the United States’ agricultural soils (Krutz et al., 2009Krutz LJ, Burke IC, Reddy KN, Zablotowicz RM, Price AJ. Enhanced atrazine degradation: evidence for reduced residual weed control and a method for identifying adapted soils and predicting herbicide persistence. Weed Sci. 2009;57(4):427-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1...
; Shaner, Henry, 2007). According to (Zablotowicz et al., 2006Zablotowicz RM, Weaver MA, Locke MA. Microbial adaptation for accelerated atrazine mineralization/ degradation in Mississippi Delta soils. Weed Sci. 2006;54(3):538-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1
https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1...
), atrazine’s cumulative mineralization was 7-fold higher in S-triazine-adapted soil than in non-adapted soils. In Brazil, enhanced degradation was observed for atrazine with 8.6-fold faster degradation in a previously applied soil (Leal et al., 2019Leal DPB, Dick DP, Stahl AM, Köppchen S, Burauel P. Atrazine degradation patterns: the role of straw cover and herbicide application history. Sci Agric. 2019;76(1):63-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0230
https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0...
). For metolachlor, the half-life declined from 18 to 2.5 days in soils with one and four consecutive herbicide applications, respectively (Sanyal, Kulshrestha 1999). A glyphosate study showed that the dissipation rate enhanced around 58 and 66% for soil with 10 and 5 years of consecutive application, respectively, compared to the untreated soil (Guijarro et al., 2018Guijarro KH, Aparicio V, Gerónimo E, Castellote M, Figuerola EL, Costa JL, Erijman L. Soil microbial communities and glyphosate decay in soils with different herbicide application history. Sci Total Environ. 2018;634:974-82. Available from: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.393). This behavior was also demonstrated to sulfosulfuron, which shown a degradation rate enhanced by a factor of 1.35 following consecutive applications in the field (Paporisch et al., 2020Paporisch A, Laor Y, Rubin B, Eizenberg H. Effect of repeated application of sulfonylurea herbicides on sulfosulfuron dissipation rate in soil. Agronomy. 2020;10(11):1-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111724
https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111724...
).

The results obtained for the sorption distribution coefficients (Kd) was higher for the non-cultivated soil than in the cornfield. The average Kd value of S-metolachlor in cornfield soil was 0.74 mL g-1, whereas 3.22 mL g-1 was observed for the non-cultivated soil (Figure 5). Since S-metolachlor mineralization in soil has been demonstrated to be negatively correlated with sorption (Alletto et al., 2013Alletto L, Benoit P, Bolognési B, Couffignal M, Bergheaud V, Dumény V et al. Sorption and mineralisation of S-metolachlor in soils from fields cultivated with different conservation tillage systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;128:97-103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11.005
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11....
, Cabrera et al., 2012Cabrera A, Papiernik SK, Koskinen WC, Rice PJ. Sorption and dissipation of aged metolachlor residues in eroded and rehabilitated soils. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68(9):1272-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3294
https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3294...
), likely, mineralization of the herbicide from cornfield soil was confounded by differences in herbicide sorption owing to differences in soil organic matter content. Thus, further research is required to determine the extent of S-metolachlor mineralization that could be solely attributable to enhanced adaptation.

Figure 5
Sorption coefficients of S-metolachlor (Kd) for soil with and without herbicide application history. Soil with history of herbicide application had received S-metolachlor for three years; Soil with no history of herbicide application have been a pasture field for five years. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals (n = 8)

4.Conclusion

Soil moisture content and co-application with glyphosate affect S-metolachlor mineralization in the soil. The latter result is relevant as S-metolachlor is often tank-mixed with glyphosate as part of burndown treatments. There was also evidence of enhanced degradation, but these results were likely confounded by differences in sorption related to soil organic matter contents. The cumulative mineralization of S-metolachlor was greater in saturated soil than in soils at field capacity or air-dried moisture levels. Also, the association with glyphosate enhanced S-metolachlor mineralization in field capacity and saturated soil. S-metolachlor sorption was higher under non-cultivated soil.

For future research it is important to test if S-metolachlor cometabolism with glyphosate application can affect preemergent herbicide efficacy. Another important study to confirm the enhanced degradation is to start an experiment designed to apply the herbicide for multiple growing seasons in the same location and soil type and evaluate at the end of the experiment if there is enhanced degradation of this herbicide.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance with this research of Dr. W. Kingery and Dr. J. Varco.

References

  • Adegas FS, Correia NM, Silva AF, Concenço G, Gazziero DLP, Dalazen G. Glyphosate-resistant (GR) soybean and corn in Brazil: past, present, and future. Adv Weed Sci. 2022;40(spe):1-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
    » https://doi.org/10.51694/AdvWeedSci/2022;40:seventy-five004
  • Alletto L, Benoit P, Bolognési B, Couffignal M, Bergheaud V, Dumény V et al. Sorption and mineralisation of S-metolachlor in soils from fields cultivated with different conservation tillage systems. Soil Till Res. 2013;128:97-103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11.005
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.11.005
  • Baran N, Gourcy L. Sorption and mineralization of S-metolachlor and its ionic metabolites in soils and vadose zone solids: consequences on groundwater quality in an alluvial aquifer (Ain Plain, France). J Contam Hydrol. 2013;154:20-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.07.009
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2013.07.009
  • Bedmar F, Daniel PE, Costa JL, Giménez D. Sorption of acetochlor, S-metolachlor, and atrazine in surface and subsurface soil horizons of Argentina. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2011;30(9):1990-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.602
  • Bonfleur EJ, Tornisielo VL, Regitano JB, Lavorenti A. The effects of glyphosate and atrazine mixture on soil microbial population and subsequent impacts on their fate in a tropical soil. Water Air Soil Poll. 2015;226(2). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2190-8
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2190-8
  • Brum CS, Franco AA, Scorza Júnior RP. [Degradation of sulfentrazone herbicide in two soils of Mato Grosso do Sul State]. Rev Bras Eng Agric Ambient. 2013;17(5):558-64. Portuguese. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000500014
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662013000500014
  • Bundt AC, Avila LA, Pivetta A, Agostinetto D, Dick DP, Burauel P. Imidazolinone degradation in soil in response to application history. Planta Daninha. 2015;33(2):341-9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-83582015000200020
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-83582015000200020
  • Cabrera A, Papiernik SK, Koskinen WC, Rice PJ. Sorption and dissipation of aged metolachlor residues in eroded and rehabilitated soils. Pest Manag Sci. 2012;68(9):1272-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3294
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3294
  • Camargo ER, Senseman SA, Haney RL, Guice JB, Mccauley GN. Soil residue analysis and degradation of saflufenacil as affected by moisture content and soil characteristics. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(12):1291-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3494
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3494
  • Clewis SB, Wilcut JW, Porterfield D. Weed management with S -Metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton ( Gossypium hirsutum L.). Weed Technol. 2006;20(1):232-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-030R.1
    » https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-05-030R.1
  • Dowler CC, Marti LR, Kvien CS, Skipper HD, Gooden DT, Zublena JP. Accelerated degradation potential of selected herbicides in the southeastern United States. Weed Technol. 1987;1(4):350-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00029882
    » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890037X00029882
  • Futagami T, Goto M, Furukawa K. Biochemical and genetic bases of dehalorespiration. Chem Rec. 2008;8(1):1-12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20134
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/tcr.20134
  • Goldreich O, Goldwasser Y, Mishael YG. Effect of soil wetting and drying cycles on metolachlor fate in soil applied as a commercial or controlled-release formulation. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):645-53. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/jf102960g
  • Guijarro KH, Aparicio V, Gerónimo E, Castellote M, Figuerola EL, Costa JL, Erijman L. Soil microbial communities and glyphosate decay in soils with different herbicide application history. Sci Total Environ. 2018;634:974-82. Available from: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.393
  • Haney RL, Senseman SA, Hons FM, Zuberer DA. Effect of glyphosate on soil microbial activity and biomass. Weed Sci. 2000;48(1):89-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745 (2000)048[0089:EOGOSM]2.0.CO;2
    » https://doi.org/10.1614/0043-1745 (2000)048[0089:EOGOSM]2.0.CO;2
  • Haney RL, Senseman SA, Krutz LJ, Hons FM. Soil carbon and nitrogen mineralization as affected by atrazine and glyphosate. Biol Fert Soils. 2002;35:35-40. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-001-0437-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-001-0437-1
  • Krutz LJ, Burke IC, Reddy KN, Zablotowicz RM, Price AJ. Enhanced atrazine degradation: evidence for reduced residual weed control and a method for identifying adapted soils and predicting herbicide persistence. Weed Sci. 2009;57(4):427-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1
    » https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-09-010.1
  • Krutz LJ, Gentry TJ, Senseman SA, Pepper IL, Tierney DP. Mineralisation of atrazine, metolachlor and their respective metabolites in vegetated filter strip and cultivated soil. Pest Manag Sci. 2006;62(6):505-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1193
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1193
  • Krutz LJ, Shaner DL, Zablotowicz RM. Enhanced degradation and soil depth effects on the fate of atrazine and major metabolites in colorado and mississippi soils. J Environ Qual. 2010;39(4):1369-77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0197
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2009.0197
  • Lancaster SH, Haney RL, Senseman SA, Kenerley CM, Hons FM. Microbial degradation of fluometuron is influenced by roundup weathermax. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(18):8588-93. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/jf801648w
  • Leal DPB, Dick DP, Stahl AM, Köppchen S, Burauel P. Atrazine degradation patterns: the role of straw cover and herbicide application history. Sci Agric. 2019;76(1):63-71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0230
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2017-0230
  • Long YH, Li RY, Wu XM. Degradation of S-metolachlor in soil as affected by environmental factors. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2014;14(1):189-98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000015
    » https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162014005000015
  • Martinez CO, Silva CMMS, Fay EF, Abakerli RB, Maia AHN, Durrant LR. Microbial degradation of sulfentrazone in a Brazilian rhodic hapludox soil. Braz J Microbiol. 2010;41(1):209-17. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000100030
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-83822010000100030
  • Middeldorp PJM, Luijten MLGC, Van De Pas BA, Van Eekert MHA, Kengen SWM, Schraa G et al. Anaerobic microbial reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated ethenes. Biorem J. 1999;3(2):151-69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10889869991219280
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/10889869991219280
  • Mohn WW, Tiedje JM. Microbial reductive dehalogenation. Microbiol Rev. 1992;56(3):482-507. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.56.3.482-507
    » https://doi.org/10.1128/mr.56.3.482-507
  • Munoz A, Koskinen WC, Cox L, Sadowsky MJ. Biodegradation and mineralization of metolachlor and alachlor by Candida xestobii. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(2):619-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w
    » https://doi.org/10.1021/jf103508w
  • Nunes AL, Vidal RA. Leaching of the S-metolachlor herbicide associated with paraquat or glyphosate in a no-tillage system. Pesqui Agropecu Trop. 2016;46(3):254-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4640405
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-40632016v4640405
  • Paporisch A, Laor Y, Rubin B, Eizenberg H. Effect of repeated application of sulfonylurea herbicides on sulfosulfuron dissipation rate in soil. Agronomy. 2020;10(11):1-14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111724
    » https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111724
  • Partoazar M, Hoodaji M, Tahmourespour A. The effect of glyphosate application on soil microbial activities in agricultural land. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(83):1-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2440
    » https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.2440
  • Rao TN, Botsa P, Naidu M. Effect of pH, humic acid and moisture content on photo catalytic degradation of herbicides in loamy sand soil. EQA. 2019;32:15-27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8243
    » https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2281-4485/8243
  • Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR. Degradation and persistence of metolachlor in soil: Effects of concentration, soil moisture, soil depth, and sterilization. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002;21(12):2640-8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
    » https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620211216
  • Sanyal D, Kulshrestha G. Effects of repeated metolachlor applications on its persistence in field soil and degradation kinetics in mixed microbial cultures. Biol Fert Soils. 1999;30:124-31. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050598
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740050598
  • Saxton KE, Rawls WJ, Romberger JS, Papendick RI. Estimating generalized soil-water characteristics from texture. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1986;50(4):1031-6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
    » https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000040039x
  • Shaner DL, Henry WB. Field history and dissipation of atrazine and metolachlor in Colorado. J Environ Qual. 2007;36(1):128-34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0160
    » https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0160
  • Shaner DL. Herbicide handbook. 10th ed. Champaign: Weed Science Society of America; 2014.
  • Smidt H, Akkermans ADL, Van Der Oost J, De Vos WM. Halorespiring bacteria-molecular characterization and detection. Enz Microb Technol. 2000;27(10):812-20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00316-1
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0229(00)00316-1
  • Stamper DM, Tuovinen OH. Biodegradation of the acetanilide herbicides alachlor, metolachlor, and propachlor. Crit Rev Microbiol. 1998;24(1):1-22. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/10408419891294163
    » https://doi.org/10.1080/10408419891294163
  • Sun Y, Zhao L, Li X, Hao Y, Xu H, Weng L, Li Y. Stimulation of earthworms ( Eisenia fetida ) on soil microbial communities to promote metolachlor degradation. Environ Pollut. 2019;248:219-28. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.058
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.01.058
  • United States Department of Agriculture – USDA. Soil survey manual. Washington: United States Department of Agriculture; 1951.
  • Wang H, Xu J, Yates SR, Zhang J, Gan J, Ma J et al. Mineralization of metsulfuron-methyl in Chinese paddy soils. Chemosphere. 2010;78(3):335-41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.023
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.023
  • Wu XM, Li M, Long YH, Liu RX, Yu YL, Fang H et al. Effects of adsorption on degradation and bioavailability of metolachlor in soil. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 2011;11(3):83-97. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162011000300007
    » https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162011000300007
  • Zablotowicz RM, Weaver MA, Locke MA. Microbial adaptation for accelerated atrazine mineralization/ degradation in Mississippi Delta soils. Weed Sci. 2006;54(3):538-47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1
    » https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-04-179R3.1
  • Zemolin CR, Avila LA, Cassol GV, Massey JH, Camargo ER. Environmental fate of S-metolachlor: a review. Plantas Daninha. 2014a;32(3):1-10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000300022
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582014000300022
  • Zemolin CR, Avila LA, Agostinetto D, Cassol GV, Bastiani M, Pestana R. Red rice control and soybean tolerance to S-metolachlor in association with glyphosate. Am J Plant Sci. 2014b;5(13):2040-7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219
    » https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2014.513219
  • Funding
    This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001 (C.R.Z graduate student assistantship). The sandwich program of C.R.Z. was financed by CNPq (Grant number 242226/2012-4). Dr. Luis Avila receives a research fellowship from CNPq (Grant number: Luis Antonio de Avila/N.Proc. 310830/2019-2).

Edited by

Approved by:
Editor in Chief: Anderson Luis Nunes
Associate Editor: Guilherme Braga Pereira Braz

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    13 Oct 2023
  • Date of issue
    2023

History

  • Received
    10 July 2023
  • Accepted
    28 Aug 2023
Sociedade Brasileira da Ciência das Plantas Daninhas - SBCPD Rua Santa Catarina, 50, sala 1302 , 86010-470 - Londrina - Paraná / Brasil , +55 (51) 3308-6006 - Londrina - PR - Brazil
E-mail: sbcpd@sbcpd.org