<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id>0102-0536</journal-id>
<journal-title><![CDATA[Horticultura Brasileira]]></journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title><![CDATA[Hortic. Bras.]]></abbrev-journal-title>
<issn>0102-0536</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Associação Brasileira de Horticultura]]></publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id>S0102-05362003000400033</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-05362003000400033</article-id>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Efeito de espécies vegetais em bordadura em cebola sobre a densidade populacional de tripes e sirfídeos predadores]]></article-title>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of different species of border plants on the population density of thrips and syrphids predators in onion crop]]></article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Gonçalves]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Paulo Antonio de Souza]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A01"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[Sousa e Silva]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[Carlos Roberto]]></given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="A02"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="A01">
<institution><![CDATA[,Empresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária e Extensão Rural de Santa Catarina EE de Ituporanga Bolsista da Embrapa]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[Ituporanga SC]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<aff id="A02">
<institution><![CDATA[,Universidade Federal de São Carlos Depto. Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva ]]></institution>
<addr-line><![CDATA[São Carlos SP]]></addr-line>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="pub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>00</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2003</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>21</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<fpage>731</fpage>
<lpage>733</lpage>
<copyright-statement/>
<copyright-year/>
<self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&amp;pid=S0102-05362003000400033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&amp;pid=S0102-05362003000400033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_pdf&amp;pid=S0102-05362003000400033&amp;lng=en&amp;nrm=iso&amp;tlng=en"></self-uri><abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="pt"><p><![CDATA[Analisou-se a relação entre o efeito do plantio de diferentes espécies vegetais, em bordadura, na cultura da cebola, Allium cepa L, na incidência de Thrips tabaci Lind. e sirfídeos predadores, Toxomerus spp. O experimento foi conduzido na Epagri, EE de Ituporanga, de agosto a dezembro de 1998. Os tratamentos foram cebola em monocultivo; cebola + trigo mourisco (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench); cebola + nabo forrageiro (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiferus Metzg.); cebola + cenoura (Daucus carota L., cv. Nantes e cv. Brasília); cebola + milho (Zea mays L.); cebola + rúcula (Eruca sativa L.) + vegetação espontânea. O plantio de diferentes espécies vegetais em bordadura não provocou diferenças significativas na incidência de tripes e sirfídeos predadores. A produtividade comercial de bulbos de cebola foi similar em sistema de monocultivo e diversificado, sugerindo ser possível adotar tais sistemas sem perdas em rendimento.]]></p></abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="short" xml:lang="en"><p><![CDATA[The effect of planting different species of border plants on the population density of thrips (Thrips tabaci Lind), and syrphid predators (Toxomerus spp.), population density were evaluated at EPAGRI, Santa Catarina State, Brazil. The research was carried out from August to December 1998. The treatments were onion monoculture; onion intercropped with buck wheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) (Poligonaceae); onion intercropped with fodder radish (Raphanus sativus L. var. oleiferus Metzg.); onion intercropped with carrots (Daucus carota L.) Nantes and Brasília cultivars; onion intercropped with maize (Zea mays L.); onion intercropped with Eruca sativa and weed. The onion thrips and syrphid predators population density were similar in onion monoculture and policulture. The yields were similar in onion monoculture and policulture, suggesting the possibility to intercrop onion without losses.]]></p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Allium cepa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[Thrips tabaci]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[inseto]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[diversidade vegetal]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[policultivo]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="pt"><![CDATA[agroecologia]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Allium cepa]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[Thrips tabaci]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[insect]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[vegetal diversity]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[policulture]]></kwd>
<kwd lng="en"><![CDATA[agroecology]]></kwd>
</kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front><body><![CDATA[ <p align="right"><b><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">P&Aacute;GINA    DO HORTICULTOR</font></b></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="4"><b>Efeito    de esp&eacute;cies vegetais em bordadura em cebola sobre a densidade populacional    de tripes e sirf&iacute;deos predadores</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="3"><b>Effect    of different species of border plants on the population density of thrips and    syrphids predators in onion crop</b></font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Paulo    Antonio de Souza Gon&ccedil;alves<sup>I</sup>; Carlos Roberto Sousa e Silva<sup>II</sup></b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>I</sup>EPAGRI,    EE de Ituporanga, C. Postal 121, 88400-000, Ituporanga-SC; Bolsista da Embrapa.    E-mail: <a href="mailto:pasg@epagri.rct-sc.br">pasg@epagri.rct-sc.br</a>    <br>   </font><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><sup>II</sup>UFSCar,    Via Washington Luiz Km 235, Depto. Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, C. Postal    676, 13565-905, S&atilde;o Carlos-SP; E-mail: <a href="mailto:dcrs@power.ufscar.br">dcrs@power.ufscar.br</a></font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><b>RESUMO</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Analisou-se a rela&ccedil;&atilde;o entre o efeito do plantio de diferentes    esp&eacute;cies vegetais, em bordadura, na cultura da cebola, <i>Allium cepa</i>    L, na incid&ecirc;ncia de <i>Thrips tabaci</i> Lind. e sirf&iacute;deos predadores,    <i>Toxomerus</i> spp. O experimento foi conduzido na Epagri, EE de Ituporanga,    de agosto a dezembro de 1998. Os tratamentos foram cebola em monocultivo; cebola    + trigo mourisco (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i> Moench); cebola + nabo forrageiro    (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L. var. <i>oleiferus</i> Metzg.); cebola + cenoura    (<i>Daucus carota</i> L., cv. Nantes e cv. Bras&iacute;lia); cebola + milho    (<i>Zea mays</i> L.); cebola + r&uacute;cula (<i>Eruca sativa</i> L.) + vegeta&ccedil;&atilde;o    espont&acirc;nea. O plantio de diferentes esp&eacute;cies vegetais em bordadura    n&atilde;o provocou diferen&ccedil;as significativas na incid&ecirc;ncia de    tripes e sirf&iacute;deos predadores. A produtividade comercial de bulbos de    cebola foi similar em sistema de monocultivo e diversificado, sugerindo ser    poss&iacute;vel adotar tais sistemas sem perdas em rendimento.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Palavras-chave:</b> <i>Allium cepa</i>, <i>Thrips tabaci</i>, inseto, diversidade    vegetal, policultivo, agroecologia.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><b>ABSTRACT</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">The effect of planting different species of border plants on the population    density of thrips (<i>Thrips tabaci</i> Lind), and syrphid predators (<i>Toxomerus</i>    spp.), population density were evaluated at EPAGRI, Santa Catarina State, Brazil.    The research was carried out from August to December 1998. The treatments were    onion monoculture; onion intercropped with buck wheat (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i>    Moench) (Poligonaceae); onion intercropped with fodder radish (<i>Raphanus sativus</i>    L. var. <i>oleiferus</i> Metzg.); onion intercropped with carrots (<i>Daucus    carota</i> L.) Nantes and Bras&iacute;lia cultivars; onion intercropped with    maize (<i>Zea mays</i> L.); onion intercropped with <i>Eruca sativa</i> and    weed. The onion thrips and syrphid predators population density were similar    in onion monoculture and policulture. The yields were similar in onion monoculture    and policulture, suggesting the possibility to intercrop onion without losses.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2"><b>Keywords:</b>    <i>Allium cepa</i>, <i>Thrips tabaci</i>, insect, vegetal diversity, policulture,    agroecology.</font></p> <hr size="1" noshade>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Santa Catarina    &eacute; um dos principais produtores nacionais de cebola (<i>Allium cepa</i>    L). O tripes, Thrips tabaci Lind., principal praga da cultura, &eacute; manejado    pelos cebolicultores com consider&aacute;vel volume de inseticidas, com consequente    efeitos na sa&uacute;de do agricultor e ambiente (Gon&ccedil;alves,1996a).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A diversidade vegetal em agroecossistemas &eacute; sugerida para gerar estabilidade    na din&acirc;mica populacional de insetos fit&oacute;fagos (Altieri, 1991; Andow,    1991; Altieri &amp; Nicholls, 1997; Altieri &amp; Nicholls, 1999). A monocultura    &eacute; considerada uma das principais causas da quebra de estabilidade de    agroecossistemas e predisposi&ccedil;&atilde;o a ocorr&ecirc;ncia de pragas    (Altieri, 1998). Em virtude do reconhecimento do potencial da diversidade vegetal    na sustentabilidade dos agroecossistemas, o volume de pesquisa tem aumentado    recentemente, atrav&eacute;s da associa&ccedil;&atilde;o de cultivos agr&iacute;colas,    agroflorestais e manejo de plantas de coberturas em pomares (Altieri &amp; Nicholls,    1997,1999).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A ocorr&ecirc;ncia de inimigos naturais em "policultivo" geralmente &eacute;    maior devido a presas e hospedeiros espec&iacute;ficos e alternativos estarem    em maior densidade populacional e serem mais dispon&iacute;veis. Ainda, em ambientes    diversificados h&aacute; maior variedade de microhabitats que abrigar&atilde;o    mais herb&iacute;voros e seus inimigos naturais; h&aacute; maior quantidade    de alimento, tais como n&eacute;ctar e p&oacute;len, consequentemente a capacidade    reprodutiva dos inimigos naturais &eacute; maior (Andow 1983, 1991; Altieri    &amp; Nicholls, 1997, 1999).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">O manejo de agroecossistemas tem efeito direto e indireto na manuten&ccedil;&atilde;o    de inimigos naturais. Altieri &amp; Nicholls (1999), enumeraram como estrat&eacute;gias    para incremento da diversidade de inimigos naturais: "diversifica&ccedil;&atilde;o    do habitat " (uso do policultivo, de plantas de cobertura, quebra-ventos e rota&ccedil;&atilde;o    de culturas); manejo ecol&oacute;gico do solo (aduba&ccedil;&atilde;o verde,    org&acirc;nica, compostagem e evitar revolvimento por mecaniza&ccedil;&atilde;o).    Estes autores citaram como pr&aacute;ticas que prejudicam a manuten&ccedil;&atilde;o    de inimigos naturais: monocultura; fertiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o qu&iacute;mica;    revolvimento do solo por mecaniza&ccedil;&atilde;o; remo&ccedil;&atilde;o total    de plantas invasoras; uso de agrot&oacute;xicos.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A influ&ecirc;ncia da diversidade vegetal na densidade populacional de esp&eacute;cies    de tripes em plantas cultivadas tem sido relatada por alguns autores. A incid&ecirc;ncia    de <i>T</i>. <i>tabaci</i> em cebola, e a porcentagem de dano da mosca, <i>Psila    rosae</i> Fab., em cenoura, <i>Daucus carota</i>, foram reduzidas em sistema    de cons&oacute;rcio comparado ao monocultivo (Uvah &amp; Coaker, 1984). Os autores    sugeriram que os vol&aacute;teis emanados pelas culturas devem ter interferido    na ocorr&ecirc;ncia dos insetos, pois n&atilde;o houve rela&ccedil;&atilde;o    entre a presen&ccedil;a de inimigos naturais e os resultados observados. A densidade    populacional de <i>T</i>. <i>tabaci</i> foi menor em alho-porr&oacute;, <i>Allium    porrum</i> L., associado com trevo (<i>Trifolium subterraneum</i>) em cobertura    em rela&ccedil;&atilde;o ao solo n&uacute; (Theunissen &amp; Schelling, 1996).    Neste trabalho, a "qualidade da planta" (trocas fisiol&oacute;gicas no metabolismo)    em sistema de cons&oacute;rcio foi apontada como respons&aacute;vel pela menor    suscetibilidade da planta a tripes.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A presen&ccedil;a de larvas de sirf&iacute;deos como predadores de <i>T. tabaci</i>    em cebola em Ituporanga, &eacute; freq&uuml;ente (Butignol, 1994; Gon&ccedil;alves,    1996b), embora seja necess&aacute;rio desenvolver estrat&eacute;gias de diversidade    vegetal para incrementar a densidade populacional (Driutti, 1998).</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Os objetivos do trabalho foram avaliar o efeito de diferentes esp&eacute;cies    vegetais, utilizadas como bordadura com a cultura da cebola, na ocorr&ecirc;ncia    de <i>T. tabaci</i> e de sirf&iacute;deos predadores (<i>Toxomerus</i> spp.),    al&eacute;m de avaliar o impacto dos diferentes tratamentos sobre a produtividade.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="3"><b>MATERIAL E M&Eacute;TODOS</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">O experimento foi realizado de 27/08/98 (transplante) a 16/12/98 (colheita,    ciclo 111 dias). O tamanho de parcelas foi de 5,6 m x 6,0 m, com 560 plantas    de cebola/parcela, e o espa&ccedil;amento foi de 40 cm X 15 cm. Entre parcelas    havia um isolamento (com elimina&ccedil;&atilde;o de invasoras por capina) de    2 m. A &aacute;rea foi manejada previamente com aduba&ccedil;&atilde;o verde    com mucuna, <i>Stizolobium</i> sp., associada a milho (<i>Zea mays</i> L.).    Utilizou-se o sistema de plantio direto com microtrator adaptado para este fim.    A aduba&ccedil;&atilde;o da cultura foi realizada de acordo com a recomenda&ccedil;&atilde;o    da Comiss&atilde;o de Fertilidade do Solo RS/SC (1994), com esterco de su&iacute;no    11545,3 Kg/ha (composi&ccedil;&atilde;o: mat&eacute;ria seca, 27,30 %; N, 34,90    g/kg; P, 23,60 g/kg; K, 1,80 g/kg; Ca, 52,80 g/kg; Mg, 4,20 g/kg; Fe, 3822,00    ppm; Mn, 368,00 ppm; Zn, 650,00 ppm; Cu, 596,00 ppm; B, 31,00 ppm). A dosagem    utilizada supriu a necessidade exata de nitrog&ecirc;nio, uma vez que o excesso    deste nutriente &eacute; apontado como causador de desequil&iacute;brio nutricional,    al&eacute;m de concorrer para uma maior incid&ecirc;ncia de doen&ccedil;as e    pragas (Chaboussou, 1987; Primavesi, 1988; Bortolli &amp; Maia, 1994). O f&oacute;sforo    foi complementado pela adi&ccedil;&atilde;o de 59,7 kg/ha de fosfato natural    de GAFSA&reg; (composi&ccedil;&atilde;o: P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> total 28%,    e sol&uacute;vel de 9%, teor de Ca, 34%).</font></p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Os tratamentos utilizados foram: 1) cebola em monocultivo; 2) cebola + trigo    mourisco (<i>Fagopyrum esculentum</i> Moench, Poligonaceae); 3) cebola + nabo    forrageiro (<i>Raphanus sativus</i> L. var. <i>oleiferus</i> Metzg., Brassicaceae),    4) cebola + cenoura (<i>Daucus carota</i> L.), cv. Nantes e cv. Bras&iacute;lia,    respectivamente nas laterais direita e esquerda da parcela; 5) cebola + milho    (<i>Z</i>ea <i>mays</i> L.) super precoce h&iacute;brido Pioneer&reg; 3072;    6) cebola + r&uacute;cula (<i>Eruca sativa</i> L. Brassicaceae) na lateral direita    da parcela + vegeta&ccedil;&atilde;o espont&acirc;nea na lateral esquerda. O    delineamento experimental utilizado foi de blocos ao acaso com quatro repeti&ccedil;&otilde;es.    As linhas centrais da parcela (3,2 m) foram ocupadas com cebola, e as 6 linhas    laterais (1,2 m de cada lado) em bordadura, foram destinadas &agrave;s culturas    em cons&oacute;rcio.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Os par&acirc;metros adotados para an&aacute;lise foram n&uacute;mero de ninfas    de tripes e larvas de sirf&iacute;deos predadores. As amostragens foram efetuadas    ao acaso em 10 plantas/parcela, em todas as folhas, com aux&iacute;lio de lupa    manual Magnifier&reg;, 3 x, tendo sido realizadas aos 40; 47; 54; 61; 68; 75;    82; 89 e 96 dias ap&oacute;s o transplante da cultura.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">O n&uacute;mero    m&eacute;dio de ninfas de <i>T. tabaci</i>, e de sirf&iacute;deos, foram transformados    para log (x + 0,5) e submetidos &agrave; an&aacute;lise de vari&acirc;ncia com    esquema de parcela subdividida no tempo (tratamentos como parcelas e datas de    avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o como subparcelas). A avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o da produtividade    foi feita atrav&eacute;s da colheita de 60 bulbos ao acaso por parcela. Os bulbos    foram classificados pelo di&acirc;metro, de acordo com a aceita&ccedil;&atilde;o    no mercado (classe 1 <u>&lt;</u> 3,5 cm; classe 2 &gt;3,5 at&eacute; 5,0 cm; classe 3 &gt;5,0    at&eacute; 7,0 cm; classe 4 &gt;7,0 at&eacute; 9,0 cm, classe 5 &gt;9,0 cm).    Apenas a produtividade comercial (bulbos de classes 2 a 5) foi considerada para    avalia&ccedil;&atilde;o. Os dados de produtividade comercial e peso m&eacute;dio    de bulbos foram submetidos &agrave; an&aacute;lise de vari&acirc;ncia.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="3"><b>RESULTADOS E DISCUSS&Atilde;O</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Os tratamentos    n&atilde;o apresentaram diferen&ccedil;as significativas, tanto para o n&uacute;mero    m&eacute;dio de ninfas de tripes, bem como para o n&uacute;mero m&eacute;dio    de larvas de sirf&iacute;deos predadores, <i>Toxomerus</i> spp., verificando-se    que as esp&eacute;cies vegetais, colocadas em bordadura, n&atilde;o influenciaram    a densidade populacional dos insetos estudados (<a href="#tabela1">Tabela 1</a>).    Driutti (1998), em trabalho realizado no mesmo local, tamb&eacute;m n&atilde;o    observou redu&ccedil;&atilde;o significativa da incid&ecirc;ncia de tripes na    &aacute;rea experimental composta de v&aacute;rias esp&eacute;cies (mistura    de nabo forrageiro, trigo mourisco, girassol, milho, repolho) em bordadura,    embora tenha observado redu&ccedil;&atilde;o populacional do inseto em plantas    de cebola nas linhas mais pr&oacute;ximas ao nabo forrageiro. Estes resultados    diferem dos de Uvah &amp; Coaker (1984), que observaram menor densidade populacional    de <i>T. tabaci</i> em cons&oacute;rcio cebola e cenoura. No entanto, naquele    trabalho, o esquema de plantio adotado (uma linha de cenoura e uma linha de    cebola) propiciou efeito de densidade de plantas superior ao presente trabalho.</font></p>     <p align="center"><a name="tabela1"></a></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/hb/v21n4/19449t1.gif"></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A utiliza&ccedil;&atilde;o de sistema de plantio direto (cobertura com palhada    de mucuna, <i>Stizolobium</i> sp. e milho, <i>Z. mays</i>) pode ter favorecido    a infesta&ccedil;&atilde;o similar de <i>T. tabaci</i> entre os tratamentos<i>.</i>    Segundo Altieri <i>et al.</i> (1990), as plantas de cobertura (presen&ccedil;a    de palhada na &aacute;rea de plantio) podem influenciar na coloniza&ccedil;&atilde;o    de insetos pelo efeito visual.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A presen&ccedil;a de predadores n&atilde;o diferiu entre tratamentos, constatando-se    a presen&ccedil;a de uma densidade populacional muito baixa, provavelmente pelo    fato das larvas de sirf&iacute;deos serem pol&iacute;fagas (n&atilde;o h&aacute;    especificidade na rela&ccedil;&atilde;o entre predador e presa) e tamb&eacute;m    pela baixa capacidade estrutural da cultura da cebola no fornecimento de alimento    e abrigo para inimigos naturais. Os resultados est&atilde;o de acordo com Booij    &amp; Noorlander (1992), que observaram que as culturas de cebola e cenoura    abrigaram baixa densidade populacional de predadores. A remo&ccedil;&atilde;o    de invasoras dentro da &aacute;rea experimental (capina com enxada) tamb&eacute;m    pode ter contribu&iacute;do para a incid&ecirc;ncia n&atilde;o diferenciada    de sirf&iacute;deos entre os tratamentos. As invasoras apresentam benef&iacute;cios    no incremento de inimigos naturais pelo fornecimento de alimento e abrigo para    oviposi&ccedil;&atilde;o, acasalamento, reprodu&ccedil;&atilde;o (Altieri &amp;    Whitcomb, 1979; Altieri &amp; Letourneau, 1982; Kloen &amp; Altieri, 1990; Garcia,    1992). Por&eacute;m, segundo EPAGRI (2000), as perdas na produtividade da cultura    da cebola s&atilde;o significativas se a cultura n&atilde;o for mantida no limpo    nos 60 dias ap&oacute;s o transplante. Portanto, a manuten&ccedil;&atilde;o    de ervas invasoras em sistema de plantio de cebola, para se obter benef&iacute;cios    na atra&ccedil;&atilde;o de predadores e auxiliar no manejo de tripes, deve    ser ap&oacute;s aos 60 dias p&oacute;s-transplante para se evitar o per&iacute;odo    cr&iacute;tico de competi&ccedil;&atilde;o com a cultura.</font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">A produtividade    comercial e o peso m&eacute;dio de bulbos (<a href="#tabela2">Tabela 2</a>)    n&atilde;o diferiu entre os tratamentos. Portanto, foi poss&iacute;vel associar    cebola com outras esp&eacute;cies vegetais em bordadura sem redu&ccedil;&atilde;o    na produtividade, pois poderia haver competi&ccedil;&atilde;o principalmente    por luz. Os sistemas de plantio com milho, cenoura ou r&uacute;cula em bordadura,    poderiam ser utilizados pelos produtores de cebola org&acirc;nicos, principalmente    aqueles que se dedicam ao fornecimento para feiras e supermercados, pois necessitam    da diversidade de produtos para atingir tais nichos de mercado.</font></p>     <p align="center"><a name="tabela2"></a></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p align="center"><img src="/img/revistas/hb/v21n4/19449t2.gif"></p>     <p align="center">&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="3"><b>AGRADECIMENTOS</b></font></p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">&Agrave; Embrapa pela concess&atilde;o de bolsa de estudos. Aos taxonomistas    L. Marinoni (Centro de Identifica&ccedil;&atilde;o de Insetos Fit&oacute;fagos,    UFPR) e Christian Thompson (USDA-EUA) pela identifica&ccedil;&atilde;o dos sirf&iacute;deos,    <i>Toxomerus</i> spp. Aos Srs. Marcelo Pitz e Lourival Defreyn pelo apoio na    condu&ccedil;&atilde;o dos trabalhos de campo.</font></p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     ]]></body>
<body><![CDATA[<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="3"><b>LITERATURA    CITADA</b></font></p>     <!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A. How best can we use biodiversity in agroecosystems ? <i>Outlook    on Agriculture</i>, v. 20, n. 1, p. 15-23, 1991.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000054&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300001&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A. Ecological impacts of industrial agriculture and the possibilities    for truly sustainable farming. <i>Monthly Review</i>, v. 50, 60-71, 1998.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000055&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300002&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A.; GLASER, D.L.; SCHMIDT, L.L. Diversification of agroecosystems    for insect pest regulation: experiments with collards. In: GLIESSMAN, S. R.    (ed.). <i>Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture.</i>    (Ecological Studies, vol. 78). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1990. p. 70-82.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000056&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300003&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A.; LETOURNEAU, D.K. Vegetation management and biological control    in agroecosystems. <i>Crop Protection</i>, v. 1, n. 4, p. 405-430, 1982.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000057&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300004&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A.; NICHOLLS, C.I. Biological control in agroecosystems through    management of entomophagous insects. In: DHALIWAL, G.S.; HEINRICHS, E.A. (eds.).    <i>Critical issues in pest management</i>. Ludhiana, India: National Agricultural    Technology Information Center, 1997. p. 67-86.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000058&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300005&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A.; NICHOLLS, C.I. Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and insect    pest management in agricultural systems. In: COLLINS, W.W.; QUALSET, C.O. (Eds.).    <i>Biodiversity in agroecosystems.</i> Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999. p. 69-84.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000059&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300006&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ALTIERI, M.A.; WHITCOMB, W.H. The potencial use of weeds in the manipulation    of beneficial insects. <i>Hortscience</i>, v. 14, n. 1, p. 13-18, 1979.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000060&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300007&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ANDOW, D. Effect of agricultural diversity on insect populations. In: LOCKERETZ    W. (ed.). <i>Environmentally sound agriculture: selected papers</i>, <i>4<sup>th</sup>    Conference</i>, <i>International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements</i>,    <i>Cambridge</i>, <i>Mass.</i>, <i>August 18-20</i>, <i>1982.</i> New York:    Praeger, 1983. p. 91-115.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000061&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300008&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">ANDOW, D.A. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. <i>Annual    Review of Entomology</i>, v. 36, p. 561-586, 1991.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000062&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300009&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">BOOIJ, C.J.H.; NOORLANDER, J. Farming systems and insect predators. <i>Agriculture</i>,    <i>Ecosystems and Environment</i>, v. 40, p. 125-135, 1992.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000063&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300010&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">BORTOLLI, S.A.; MAIA, I.G. Influ&ecirc;ncia da aplica&ccedil;&atilde;o de fertilizantes    na ocorr&ecirc;ncia de pragas. In: S&Aacute;, M.E., BUZZETI, S. (coord.) <i>Import&acirc;ncia    da aduba&ccedil;&atilde;o na qualidade dos produtos agr&iacute;colas.</i> S&atilde;o    Paulo: Icone, 1994. p. 53-63.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000064&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300011&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">BUTIGNOL, C.A. <i>Toxomerus taenia</i> (Diptera, Syrphidae) predador de trips    em alho e cebola. In: SIMP&Oacute;SIO DE CONTROLE BIOL&Oacute;GICO, 4., Gramado.    <i>Anais</i>... Pelotas: EMBRAPA/CPACT, 1994. p. 235.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000065&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300012&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">CHABOUSSOU, F. <i>Plantas doentes pelo uso de agrot&oacute;xicos: a teoria    da trofobiose.</i> 2 ed. Porto Alegre: L &amp; PM, 1987. 256 p.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000066&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300013&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">COMISS&Atilde;O DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO - RS/SC. <i>Recomenda&ccedil;&otilde;es    de aduba&ccedil;&atilde;o e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul    e de Santa Catarina.</i> 3 ed. Passo Fundo: SBCS - N&uacute;cleo Regional Sul,    1994. 224p.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000067&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300014&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">DRIUTTI,    A.A. <i>Controle Biol&oacute;gico de tripes na cultura da cebola pelo cultivo    de bordaduras ou entrelinhas.</i> Dispon&iacute;vel: http:/www.cca.ufsc.br/pgagr/1998.htm.    Consultado em 20/11/2002.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000068&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300015&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">EPAGRI. <i>Sistema de produ&ccedil;&atilde;o para cebola: Santa Catarina</i>    (3. revis&atilde;o). Florian&oacute;polis: EPAGRI, 2000. 91 p.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000069&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300016&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">GARCIA, M.A. Controle de plantas invasoras em agroecossistemas; os dois lados    da moeda. In: SIMP&Oacute;SIO DE CONTROLE BIOL&Oacute;GICO, 3., &Aacute;guas    de Lind&oacute;ia. <i>Anais.</i>.. Jaguari&uacute;na: EMBRAPA CNPDA, 1992. p.    102.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000070&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300017&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">GON&Ccedil;ALVES, P.A.S. Determina&ccedil;&atilde;o de danos de <i>Thrips tabaci</i>    Lind. em cultivares de cebola. <i>Pesquisa Agropecu&aacute;ria Brasileira</i>,    Bras&iacute;lia, v. 31, n. 3, p. 173-179, 1996a.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000071&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300018&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">GON&Ccedil;ALVES, P.A.S. Levantamento de predadores de <i>Thrips tabaci</i>    em cebola. In: SIMP&Oacute;SIO DE CONTROLE BIOL&Oacute;GICO, 5., Foz do Igua&ccedil;u.    <i>Anais</i>... Curitiba: COBRAFI/EMBRAPA/CNPSo, 1996b. p. 342.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000072&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300019&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">KLOEN, H.; ALTIERI, M.A. Effect of mustard (<i>Brassica hirta</i>) as a non-crop    plant on competition and insect pests in broccoli (<i>Brassica oleracea</i>).    <i>Crop Protection</i>, v. 9, n. 2, p. 90-96, 1990.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000073&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300020&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">PRIMAVESI, A.M. <i>Manejo ecol&oacute;gico de pragas e doen&ccedil;as.</i>    S&atilde;o Paulo: Nobel, 1988. 137 p.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000074&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300021&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">THEUNISSEN, J.; SCHELLING, G. Pest and disease management by intercropping:    suppression of thrips and rust in leek. <i>International Journal of Pest Management</i>,    v. 42, n. 4, p. 227-234, 1996.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000075&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300022&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><!-- ref --><p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">UVAH, I.I.I.;    COAKER, T.H. Effect of mixed cropping on some insect pests of carrots and onions.    <i>Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata</i>, v. 36, p. 159-167, 1984.</font>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[&#160;<a href="javascript:void(0);" onclick="javascript: window.open('/scielo.php?script=sci_nlinks&ref=000076&pid=S0102-0536200300040003300023&lng=','','width=640,height=500,resizable=yes,scrollbars=1,menubar=yes,');">Links</a>&#160;]<!-- end-ref --><p>&nbsp;</p>     <p>&nbsp;</p>     <p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica-Normal, sans-serif" size="2">Recebido    para publica&ccedil;&atilde;o em 4 de dezembro de 2002 e aceito em 12 de agosto    de 2003</font></p>      ]]></body><back>
<ref-list>
<ref id="B1">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[How best can we use biodiversity in agroecosystems ?]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Outlook on Agriculture]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>20</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>15-23</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Ecological impacts of industrial agriculture and the possibilities for truly sustainable farming]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Monthly Review]]></source>
<year>1998</year>
<volume>50</volume>
<page-range>60-71</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLASER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHMIDT]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[L.L.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Diversification of agroecosystems for insect pest regulation: experiments with collards]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GLIESSMAN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S. R.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<page-range>70-82</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Springer-Verlag]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LETOURNEAU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.K.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Vegetation management and biological control in agroecosystems]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Crop Protection]]></source>
<year>1982</year>
<volume>1</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>405-430</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NICHOLLS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biological control in agroecosystems through management of entomophagous insects]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DHALIWAL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[HEINRICHS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[E.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Critical issues in pe]]></source>
<year>1997</year>
<page-range>67-86</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Ludhiana ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[National Agricultural Technology Information Center]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NICHOLLS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Biodiversity, ecosystem function, and insect pest management in agricultural systems]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COLLINS]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.W.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[QUALSET]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.O.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Biodiversity in agroecosystems]]></source>
<year>1999</year>
<page-range>69-84</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Boca Raton ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[CRC Press]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[WHITCOMB]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[The potencial use of weeds in the manipulation of beneficial insects]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Hortscience]]></source>
<year>1979</year>
<volume>14</volume>
<numero>1</numero>
<issue>1</issue>
<page-range>13-18</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANDOW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of agricultural diversity on insect populations]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[LOCKERETZ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[W.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Environmentally sound agriculture: selected papers]]></source>
<year>1983</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[4 Conference, International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements]]></conf-name>
<conf-date>August 18-20, 1982</conf-date>
<conf-loc>Cambridge </conf-loc>
<page-range>91-115</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[New York ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Praeger]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ANDOW]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[D.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Annual Review of Entomology]]></source>
<year>1991</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>561-586</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BOOIJ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.J.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[NOORLANDER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Farming systems and insect predators]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<page-range>125-135</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BORTOLLI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[MAIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Influência da aplicação de fertilizantes na ocorrência de pragas]]></article-title>
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SÁ]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.E.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUZZETI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Importância da adubação na qualidade dos produtos agrícolas]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<page-range>53-63</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Icone]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[BUTIGNOL]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[C.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Toxomerus taenia (Diptera, Syrphidae) predador de trips em alho e cebola]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anais]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[4 SIMPÓSIO DE CONTROLE BIOLÓGICO]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Gramado </conf-loc>
<page-range>235</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Pelotas ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EMBRAPA/CPACT]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[CHABOUSSOU]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[F.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Plantas doentes pelo uso de agrotóxicos: a teoria da trofobiose]]></source>
<year>1987</year>
<edition>2</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Porto Alegre ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[L & PM]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>COMISSÃO DE FERTILIDADE DO SOLO</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Recomendações de adubação e de calagem para os estados do Rio Grande do Sul e de Santa Catarina]]></source>
<year>1994</year>
<edition>3</edition>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Passo Fundo^eRS^eSC RSSC]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[SBCS - Núcleo Regional Sul]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<nlm-citation citation-type="">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[DRIUTTI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Controle Biológico de tripes na cultura da cebola pelo cultivo de bordaduras ou entrelinhas]]></source>
<year></year>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<collab>EPAGRI</collab>
<source><![CDATA[Sistema de produção para cebola]]></source>
<year>2000</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[Santa CatarinaFlorianópolis ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EPAGRI]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GARCIA]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Controle de plantas invasoras em agroecossistemas; os dois lados da moeda]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anais]]></source>
<year>1992</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[3 SIMPÓSIO DE CONTROLE BIOLÓGICO]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Águas de Lindóia </conf-loc>
<page-range>102</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Jaguariúna ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[EMBRAPA CNPDA]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONÇALVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Determinação de danos de Thrips tabaci Lind. em cultivares de cebola]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>31</volume>
<numero>3</numero>
<issue>3</issue>
<page-range>173-179</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Brasília ]]></publisher-loc>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<nlm-citation citation-type="confpro">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[GONÇALVES]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[P.A.S.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="pt"><![CDATA[Levantamento de predadores de Thrips tabaci em cebola]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Anais]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<conf-name><![CDATA[5 SIMPÓSIO DE CONTROLE BIOLÓGICO]]></conf-name>
<conf-loc>Foz do Iguaçu </conf-loc>
<page-range>342</page-range><publisher-loc><![CDATA[Curitiba ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[COBRAFI/EMBRAPA/CNPSo]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[KLOEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[H.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[ALTIERI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[M.A.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of mustard (Brassica hirta) as a non-crop plant on competition and insect pests in broccoli (Brassica oleracea)]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Crop Protection]]></source>
<year>1990</year>
<volume>9</volume>
<numero>2</numero>
<issue>2</issue>
<page-range>90-96</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<nlm-citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[PRIMAVESI]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[A.M.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source><![CDATA[Manejo ecológico de pragas e doenças]]></source>
<year>1988</year>
<publisher-loc><![CDATA[São Paulo ]]></publisher-loc>
<publisher-name><![CDATA[Nobel]]></publisher-name>
</nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[THEUNISSEN]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[J.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[SCHELLING]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[G.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Pest and disease management by intercropping: suppression of thrips and rust in leek]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[International Journal of Pest Management]]></source>
<year>1996</year>
<volume>42</volume>
<numero>4</numero>
<issue>4</issue>
<page-range>227-234</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<nlm-citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[UVAH]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[I.I.I.]]></given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname><![CDATA[COAKER]]></surname>
<given-names><![CDATA[T.H.]]></given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en"><![CDATA[Effect of mixed cropping on some insect pests of carrots and onions]]></article-title>
<source><![CDATA[Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata]]></source>
<year>1984</year>
<volume>36</volume>
<page-range>159-167</page-range></nlm-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
